The history ofliberal parties in Germany dates back to 1861, when theGerman Progress Party (DFP) was founded, being the first political party in the modern sense in Germany. From the establishment of theNational Liberal Party in 1867 until the demise of theWeimar Republic in 1933, the liberal-democratic camp was divided into anational-liberal and aleft-liberal line of tradition. After 1918, the national-liberal strain was represented by theGerman People's Party (DVP), the left-liberal one by theGerman Democratic Party (DDP, which merged into theGerman State Party in 1930). Both parties played an important role in government during the Weimar Republic era, but successively lost votes during the rise of theNazi Party beginning in the late-1920s. After theNazi seizure of power, both liberal parties agreed to theEnabling Act of 1933 and subsequently dissolved themselves. During the 12 years of Hitler's rule, some former liberals collaborated with the Nazis (e.g. economy ministerHjalmar Schacht), while others resisted actively against Nazism, with some Liberal leaning members and former members of the military joining up withHenning von Tresckow (e.g. theSolf Circle).
In September 1945, citizens inHamburg—including the anti-Nazi resistance circle Association Free Hamburg—established theParty of Free Democrats (PFD) as abourgeois left-wing party and the first liberal Party in the Western occupation zones. The German Democratic Party was revived in some states of the Western occupation zones (in the Southwestern states ofWürttemberg-Baden andWürttemberg-Hohenzollern under the name ofDemocratic People's Party).
Many former members of DDP and DVP however agreed to finally overcome the traditional split of German liberalism into a national-liberal and a left-liberal branch, aiming for the creation of a united liberal party.[9] In October 1945 a liberal coalition party was founded in the state ofBremen under the name of Bremen Democratic People's Party. In January 1946, liberal state parties of theBritish occupation zone merged into the Free Democratic Party of the British Zone (FDP). A similar state party inHesse, called the Liberal Democratic Party, was licensed by theU.S. military government in January 1946. In the state of Bavaria, a Free Democratic Party was founded in May 1946.
In the first post-war state elections in 1946, liberal parties performed well in Württemberg-Baden (16.8%), Bremen (18.3%), Hamburg (18.2%) and Greater Berlin (still undivided; 9.3%). The LDP was especially strong in the October 1946 state elections of the Soviet zone—the last free parliamentary election in East Germany—obtaining an average of 24.6% (highest in Saxony-Anhalt, 29.9%, and Thuringia, 28.5%), thwarting an absolute majority of theSocialist Unity Party of Germany (SED) that was favoured by the Soviet occupation power. This disappointment to the Communists led to a change of electoral laws in the Soviet zone, cutting the autonomy of non-socialist parties including the LDP and forcing it to join the SED-dominatedNational Front, making it a dependentbloc party.
TheDemocratic Party of Germany (DPD) was established inRothenburg ob der Tauber on 17 March 1947 as a pan-German party of liberals from all four occupation zones. Its leaders wereTheodor Heuss (representing the DVP of Württemberg-Baden in the American zone) andWilhelm Külz (representing the LDP of the Soviet zone). However, the project failed in January 1948 as a result of disputes over Külz's pro-Soviet direction.
Theodor Heuss, first chairman of the FDP and first President of West Germany
The Free Democratic Party was established on 11–12 December 1948 inHeppenheim, inHesse, as an association of all 13 liberal state parties in the three Western zones of occupation.[Note 1][10] As such, the party included former members of the pre-1933German People's Party (DVP) which represented the moreconservative andnational tradition ofGerman liberalism and members from thesocial liberalGerman Democratic Party (DDP). The proposed name, Liberal Democratic Party, was rejected by the delegates, who voted 64 to 25 in favour of the name Free Democratic Party (FDP).
The party's first chairman was Theodor Heuss, a member of the Democratic People's Party in Württemberg-Baden; his deputy wasFranz Blücher of the FDP in the British Zone. The place for the party's foundation was chosen deliberately: the "Heppenheim Assembly" was held at the HotelHalber Mond on 10 October 1847, a meeting of moderate liberals who were preparing for what would be, within a few months, theGerman revolutions of 1848–1849.
"Schlußstrich drunter!"—FDP election campaign poster reading "Draw a line under it" before the 1949 Bundestag election in Hesse calling for a halt to "denazification, disenfranchisement, disempowerment, second class citizenship" and for "equality of civil rights"
In thefirst elections to the Bundestag on 14 August 1949, the FDP won a vote share of 11.9 percent (with 12 direct mandates, particularly in Baden-Württemberg and Hesse), and thus obtained 52 of 402 seats. In September of the same year the FDP chairmanTheodor Heuss was elected the firstPresident of theFederal Republic of Germany. In his1954 re-election, he received the best election result to date of a President with 871 of 1018 votes (85.6 percent) of theFederal Assembly. Adenauer was also elected on the proposal of the new German President with an extremely narrow majority as the first Chancellor. The FDP participated with theCDU/CSU and the national-conservativeGerman Party (DP) in Adenauer's coalition cabinet; they had three ministers:Franz Blücher (Vice-Chancellor),Thomas Dehler (justice), andEberhard Wildermuth (housing).
On the most important economic, social andGerman national issues, the FDP agreed with their coalition partners, the CDU/CSU. However, the FDP offered to middle-class voters a secular party that refused thereligious schools and accused the opposition parties of clericalization. The FDP said they were known also as a consistent representative of the market economy, while the CDU was then dominated nominally from the Ahlen Programme, which allowed aThird Way betweencapitalism andsocialism.Ludwig Erhard, the father of thesocial market economy, had his followers in the early years of the Federal Republic in the CDU/CSU rather than in the FDP. The FDP won Hesse's 1950 state election with 31.8 percent, the best result in its history, through appealing to East Germans displaced by the war by including them on their ticket.
Up to the 1950s, several of the FDP's regional organizations were to the right of the CDU/CSU, particularly theHesse,Lower Saxony, andNorth Rhine-Westphalia branches whereFriedrich Middelhauve tried to foster a National Rally as a third bloc next to Social Democrats and Christian Democrats. This was criticized by the social liberals aroundTheodor Heuss who distanced himself from the "Nazi FDP" branches.[11] Under the influence of the party's right wing, the Free Democrats campaigned against West Germany'sdenazification provisions and courted even former office-holders of the Third Reich with nationalist values. At their party conference in Munich in 1951, they demanded the release of all "so-calledwar criminals" and welcomed the establishment of the "Association of German soldiers" of formerWehrmacht andSS members to advance the integration of the Nazi forces in democracy. These FDP members were seen as part of thefar-right extremist bloc, along with theGerman Party in West Germany, by US intelligence officials.[12] The 1953Naumann Circle, named afterWerner Naumann, consisted of a group of former Nazis who tried to infiltrate the party. After theBritish occupation authorities had arrested seven prominent members of the Naumann Circle, the FDP federal board installed a commission of inquiry, chaired by Thomas Dehler, which particularly sharply criticized the situation in the North Rhine-Westphalian FDP. In the following years, the right wing lost power, and the extreme right increasingly sought areas of activity outside the FDP. In the1953 federal election, the FDP received 9.5 percent of the party votes, 10.8 percent of the primary vote (with 14 direct mandates, particularly inHamburg, Lower Saxony, Hesse,Württemberg, andBavaria) and 48 of 487 seats.[citation needed]
In the second term of the Bundestag, the South German Liberal Democrats gained influence in the party controlling the party leadership between 1954 and 1960.[citation needed] Thomas Dehler, a representative of a more social-liberal course fromBavaria took over as party and parliamentary leader. The former Minister of Justice Dehler, who in 1933 suffered persecution by the Nazis, was known for his populist rhetorics and tried to emancipate the party from Adenauer's CDU/CSU. In the mid-1950s, there were some disagreements between Dehler and Adenauer over foreign policy issues, particularly the founding of theEuropean Defence Community and theSaar statute. The FDP took an emphatically nationalist stance on both issues.[13] In 1956, the infights between Dehler and Adenauer culminated in a government crisis: The FDP in North Rhine-Westphalia terminated their alliance with the Christian Democrats and formed a new state government with theSocial Democratic Party of Germany and theGerman Center Party which led to a party split. 16 members of parliament, including former party leaderFranz Blücher and the four federal ministers from the FDP left their party and founded the short-livedFree People's Party (FVP). Whilst the FVP continued the government coalition with Adenauer's CDU/CSU and merged with the right-wing German Party in 1957, the FDP took it to the opposition for the first time in its history.[13]
Only one of the smaller post-war parties, the FDP survived despite many problems. In the1957 federal elections they still reached 7.7 percent of the vote and held 41 of 497 seats in the Bundestag. However, they still remained in opposition because the Union won an absolute majority. At the federal party meeting in Berlin at the end of January 1957, Thomas Dehler was replaced as party chairman by another liberal democrat from South Germany,Reinhold Maier, who was able to stabilize his party before he made way forErich Mende from North Rhine-Westphalia in 1960. With Mende as party leader the FDP went into the1961 federal election with the promise of ending Konrad Adenauer's leadership and gained 12.8 percent nationwide, the best result until then. After the election, however, the FDP again formed a coalition with Adenauer's CDU on the condition that he would retire as chancellor after two years. These events led to the FDP being nicknamed theUmfallerpartei ("pushover party").[14] In the 1962Spiegel affair, the FDP temporarily withdrew their ministers from the federal government forcingDefence MinisterFranz-Josef Strauß to resign. In accordance with his agreement with the FDP, Adenauer resigned from his chancellorship in October 1963, making place forLudwig Erhard who appointed FDP leader Erich Mende as Vice Chancellor andMinister of All-German Affairs.
In the1965 federal elections the FDP gained 9.5 percent. The Free Democrats initially renewed their alliance with the CDU under Erhard but the coalition broke up in 1966 on the issue of tax increases. During the 1966-1969Grand coalition the party led the opposition. Under their new chairman, Walter Scheel, there were signs of a change both in foreign policy and in party strategy: For the first time, the FDP opened up to a coalition with the SPD on a federal level, embracing foreign ministerWilly Brandt'sOstpolitik.
The1969 West German federal election led to the firstsocial-liberal coalition between Social Democrats and Free Democrats in German post-war history. Even though the Christian Democrats won the election, the Free Democrats rejected a new centre-right alliance and opted for a centre-left coalition under the new ChancellorWilly Brandt. With FDP leader Walter Scheel as Vice Chancellor and Foreign Minister, the liberals initiated a new controversialOstpolitik effectively normalizing relations between capitalist-democratic West Germany and communist-led East Germany. Within the FDP, this policy was quite controversial, especially after thede facto recognition of theOder-Neisse line by the 1970Treaty of Warsaw.
In July 1970, right-wing members founded a "non-partisan" organization called the National-Liberal Action with the goal of breaking up the SPD/FDP coalition government. A little later, members of parliament Siegfried Zoglmann,Heinz Starke and former party leaderErich Mende left the party with Starke and Mende joining the CDU and Zoglmann founding a new splinter party called German Union(Deutsche Union). This led to the1972 snap elections from which the SPD/FDP government emerged even stronger. In 1974, party leader Walter Scheel was the second Liberal to be elected Federal President afterTheodor Heuss. He was succeeded by Interior MinisterHans-Dietrich Genscher as the new FDP leader and Foreign Minister who continued the centre-left coalition under new SPD ChancellorHelmut Schmidt.
The party's centre-left strategy was supported by a new party manifesto, the 1971 Freiburg Theses (Freiburger Thesen) which set the party on aprogressive andsocial liberal course.[15] Among other things, the party committed itself to "self-determination", "democratization of society", a "reform of capitalism" and a form ofecoliberalism which prioritized "environmental protection over profit and personal gains".[16] However, in 1977, the progressive liberal Freiburg Theses were supplemented and partially revised by the moreeconomically liberal Kiel Theses (Kieler Thesen), effectively setting the party back on a classical liberal course.
Even prior to the1980 West German federal election, cooperation between Social Democrats and Free Democrats seemed to come to an end but the candidacy of CSU chairmanFranz Josef Strauss for chancellor led both parties to once again renew their coalition government.
1982–1998: Kohl government, economic transition and reunification
In the fall of 1982, the FDP reneged on its coalition agreement with the SPD and instead threw its support behind the CDU/CSU. On 1 October, the FDP and CDU/CSU were able to oust Schmidt and replace him with CDU party chairman Helmut Kohl as the new Chancellor. The coalition change resulted in severe internal conflicts, and the FDP then lost about 20 percent of its 86,500 members, as reflected in the general election in 1983 by a drop from 10.6 percent to 7.0 percent. The members went mostly to the SPD, the Greens and newly formed splinter parties, such as the left-liberal partyLiberal Democrats (LD). The exiting members included the former FDP General Secretary and later EU CommissionerGünter Verheugen.
At the party convention in November 1982, theSchleswig-Holstein state chairmanUwe Ronneburger challengedHans-Dietrich Genscher as party chairman. Ronneburger received 186 of the votes—about 40 percent—and was just narrowly defeated by Genscher who went on to act as party chairman as well as Vice Chancellor and Foreign Minister in the newKohl government. In the following federal election campaigns during the 1980s and 1990s, the party sided with the CDU and CSU, the main conservative parties in Germany.
in 1980, FDP members who did not agree with the politics of the left-leaning FDP youth organizationYoung Democrats founded theYoung Liberals (JuLis). For a time JuLis and the Young Democrats operated side by side, until the JuLis became the sole official youth wing of the FDP in 1983. The Young Democrats split from the FDP and were left as a party-independent youth organization ultimately merging with a marxist youth group to form the "Young Democrats/Young Left" in 1992.
During the "Peaceful Revolution" of 1989 in theGDR, a couple of new liberal parties emerged from the opposition, like theFree Democratic Party (East Germany) or theGerman Forum Party. Prior to theMarch 1990 Volkskammer elections they joined the establishedLiberal Democratic Party, who had previously acted as a pro-communistbloc party on the side of the SED, to form theAlliance of Free Democrats (BFD). In theVolkskammer election of March 1990 the Association of Free Democrats was heavily supported by the West German FDP and polled 5.28% of the votes. Most of the seats went toLiberal Democratic Party members, whose leaderRainer Ortleb became their parliamentary leader. It then participated in the last GDR government led byLothar de Maizière. After theLiberal Democratic Party and another former bloc party, theNational Democratic Party of Germany, merged into the new partyAssociation of Free Democrats in late March, the several liberal parties all united with the West German FDP in August 1990 to form the first all-German party. The merger brought the Free Democrats a great, albeit short-lived, increase in membership and assets of DM 6.3 million in cash and property.
At the time of reunification, the FDP's objective was a special economic zone in the former East Germany, but the party could not prevail against the CDU/CSU. In thefirst all-German Bundestag elections, the centre-right Kohl coalition was confirmed, the FDP received 11.0 percent of the valid votes (79 seats) and won in Genscher's city of birthHalle (Saale) the first direct mandate since 1957. During the 1990s, the FDP won between 6.2 and 11 percent of the vote in Bundestag elections.
In the second half of the 1990s, however, the FDP had to contend with a series of electoral defeats at local and state level, which led to it falling out of twelve of the 16 state parliaments and the European Parliament between 1993 and 1995. The party was derisively referred to as the 'lady without an abdomen'. At the same time, the party was shaken by new infights between the left and right wings. In 1996, Federal Minister of JusticeSabine Leutheusser-Schnarrenberger, a prominent representative of the party'ssocial liberal wing, resigned in protest to the government's policy of expanding the state's right to interfere in citizens' private domain by means of acoustic observation(Großer Lauschangriff, literally "big eavesdropping attack"). On the other hand, formerPublic Prosecutor GeneralAlexander von Stahl tried to rebuild the party'snational liberal wing in an ultimately failed attempt to bring the FDP onto a right-wing course modelled onJörg Haider'sFPÖ inAustria.[17][18]
These infights contributed to the CDU/CSU-FDP defeat in the1998 German federal election which ended the 16-year centre-right coalition in Germany and the FDP's nearly three decade reign in government. For the first time since 1969 (apart from a brief period in 1982), the Free Democrats now found themselves in opposition and out of power on a federal level.
Following their electoral defeat, the party developed a strategy of equidistance to the CDU and SPD championed byNorth Rhine-Westfalia state party leaderJürgen Möllemann who led the party to a good result in the2000 state elections. At their 2001 party conference in Düsseldorf, outgoing party leaderWolfgang Gerhardt was replaced by a 39 year oldGuido Westerwelle who became the youngest FDP leader in history. The party conference also adopted a strategy developed by Möllemann which became known as 'Project 18'. It aimed at winning new groups of voters through new forms of communication and presentation and at profiling the party as an independent force autonomous from SPD and CDU. The name referred to the electoral goal of tripling the party's share of the vote from 6% to 18%. While Westerwelle and Möllemann generated a lot of media attention, the party was once again embroiled in controversy on Westerwelle's perceived lack of seriousness in his election campaign ("Spaßwahlkampf") and on Möllemann's alleged right-wing populism. Many critics interpreted the use of thenumber 18 as a hidden right-wing extremist symbol (a code for the letters A and H, meaning Adolf Hitler) and an attempt to attract voters on the far right. In addition, Möllemann launched a leaflet campaign with harsh criticism of theIsraeli government underAriel Sharon and the German-Jewish journalistMichel Friedman, which critics interpreted as anti-Semitism. Amid controversy over a possible right-wing populist orientation associated with this, the FDP ultimately achieved 7.4% instead of the targeted 18 per cent in the2002 German federal election.
Former logo (2001–2014)
In the2005 general election the party won 9.8 percent of the vote and 61 federal deputies, an unpredicted improvement from prior opinion polls. It is believed that this was partly due totactical voting by CDU andChristian Social Union of Bavaria (CSU) alliance supporters who hoped for stronger market-oriented economic reforms than the CDU/CSU alliance called for. However, because the CDU did worse than predicted, the FDP and the CDU/CSU alliance were unable to form a coalition government. At other times, for example after the 2002 federal election, a coalition between the FDP and CDU/CSU was impossible primarily because of the weak results of the FDP.
The CDU/CSU parties had achieved the third-worst performance in German postwar history with only 35.2 percent of the votes. Therefore, the FDP was unable to form a coalition with its preferred partners, the CDU/CSU parties. As a result, the party was considered as a potential member of two otherpolitical coalitions, following the election. One possibility was a partnership between the FDP, theSocial Democratic Party of Germany (SPD) and theAlliance 90/The Greens, known as a "traffic light coalition", named after the colors of the three parties. This coalition was ruled out, because the FDP considered the Social Democrats and the Greens insufficiently committed to market-orientedeconomic reform. The other possibility was a CDU-FDP-Green coalition, known as a "Jamaica coalition" because of the colours of the three parties. This coalition wasn't concluded either, since the Greens ruled out participation in any coalition with the CDU/CSU. Instead, the CDU formed aGrand coalition with the SPD, and the FDP entered theopposition. FDP leaderGuido Westerwelle became the unofficial leader of the opposition by virtue of the FDP's position as the largest opposition party in the Bundestag.
In the2009 European election, the FDP received 11% of the national vote (2,888,084 votes in total) and returned 12MEPs.[19]
In theSeptember 2009 federal elections, the FDP increased its share of the vote by 4.8 percentage points to 14.6%, an all-time record. This percentage was enough to offset a decline in the CDU/CSU's vote compared to 2005, to create a CDU-FDP centre-right governing coalition in the Bundestag with a 53% majority of seats. On election night, party leader Westerwelle said his party would work to ensure that civil liberties were respected and that Germany got an "equitable tax system and better education opportunities".[20]
The party also made gains in the two state elections held at the same time, acquiring sufficient seats for a CDU-FDP coalition in the northernmost state,Schleswig-Holstein,[21] and gaining enough votes in left-leaningBrandenburg to clear the 5% hurdle to enter that state's parliament.[citation needed]
However, after reaching its best ever election result in 2009, the FDP's support collapsed.[22] The party's policy pledges were put on hold by Merkel as theGreat Recession unfolded and with the onset of theEuropean debt crisis in 2010.[23] By the end of 2010, the party's support had dropped to as low as 5%. The FDP retained their seats in the state elections inNorth Rhine-Westphalia, which was held six months after the federal election, but out of the seven state elections that have been held since 2009, the FDP have lost all their seats in five of them due to failing to cross the 5% threshold.[24]
Support for the party further eroded amid infighting and an internal rebellion over euro-area bailouts during the debt crisis.[25]
Westerwelle stepped down as party leader following the 2011 state elections, in which the party was wiped out inSaxony-Anhalt andRhineland-Palatinate and lost half its seats inBaden-Württemberg. Westerwelle was replaced in May 2011 byPhilipp Rösler. Rösler was the first cabinet minister and vice-chancellor of Asian background in Germany. Rösler was the first cabinet minister and vice-chancellor of Asian background in Germany. The change in leadership failed to revive the FDP's fortunes, however, and in the next series of state elections, the party lost all its seats inBremen,Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, andBerlin.[26] In Berlin, the party lost nearly 75% of the support they had had in the previous election.[27]
In March 2012, the FDP lost all their state-level representation in the2012 Saarland state election. However, this was offset by theSchleswig-Holstein state elections, when they achieved 8% of the vote, which was a severe loss of seats but still over the 5% threshold. In the snap elections inNorth Rhine-Westphalia a week later, the FDP not only crossed the electoral threshold, but also increased its share of the votes to 2 percentage points higher than in the previous state election. This was attributed to the local leadership ofChristian Lindner.[28]
The FDP last won a directly elected seat in 1990, inHalle—the only time it has won a directly elected seat since 1957.[29] The party's inability to win directly elected seats came back to haunt it at the2013 election, in which it came up just short of the 5% threshold. With no directly elected seats, the FDP was shut out of the Bundestag for the first time since 1949. After the previous chairman Philipp Rösler then resigned, Christian Lindner took over the leadership of the party.
In the2014 European parliament elections, the FDP received 3.4% of the national vote (986,253 votes in total) and returned 3MEPs.[30] In the2014 Brandenburg state election the party experienced a 5.8% down-swing and lost all their representatives in the Brandenburg state parliament. In the2014 Saxony state election, the party experienced a 5.2% down-swing, again losing all of its seats. In the2014 Thuringian state election a similar phenomenon was repeated with the party falling below the 5% threshold following a 5.1% drop in popular vote.
The party managed to enter parliament in the2015 Bremen state election with the party receiving 6.5% of the vote and gaining 6 seats. However, it failed to get into government as a coalition between the Social Democrats and the Greens was created. In the2016 Mecklenburg-Vorpommern state election the party failed to get into parliament despite increasing its vote share by 0.3%. The party did manage to get into parliament inBaden-Württemberg, gaining 3% of the vote and a total of 12 seats. This represents a five-seat improvement over their previous results. In the2016 Berlin state election the party gained 4.9% of the vote and 12 seats but still failed to get into government. A red-red-green coalition was instead formed relegating the FDP to the opposition. In the2016 Rhineland-Palatinate state election, the party managed to enter parliament receiving 6.2% of the vote and 7 seats. It also managed to enter government under atraffic light coalition. In2016 Saxony-Anhalt state election the party narrowly missed the 5% threshold, receiving 4.9% of the vote and therefore receiving zero seats despite a 1% swing in their favour.
The2017 North Rhine-Westphalia state election was widely considered a test of the party's future as their chairman Christian Lindner was also leading the party in that state. The party experienced a 4% swing in its favour gaining 6 seats and entering into a coalition with the CDU with a bare majority. In the2017 Saarland state election the party again failed to gain any seats despite a 1% swing in their favour. The party gained 3 seats and increased its vote share by 3.2% in the2017 Schleswig-Holstein state election. This success was often credited to their state chairmanWolfgang Kubicki. They also managed to re-enter the government under aJamaica coalition.
In the2017 federal election the party scored 10.7% of votes and re-entered the Bundestag, winning 80 seats. After the election, aJamaica coalition was considered between the CDU, Greens, and FDP. However, FDP chief Christian Lindner walked out of the coalition talks due to a disagreement over European migration policy, saying "It is better not to govern than to govern badly."[31][32] As a result, the CDU/CSU formed anothergrand coalition with the SPD.
In theOctober 2019 Thuringian state election, the FDP won seats in the Landtag ofThuringia for the first time since 2009. It exceeded the 5% threshold by just 5 votes.[33] In February 2020, the FDP'sThomas Kemmerich was elected Minister-President of Thuringia by the Landtag with the likely support of the CDU andAfD, becoming the second member of the FDP to serve as head of government in a German state. This was also the first time a head of government had been elected with the support of AfD. Under intense pressure from state and federal politicians, Kemmerich resigned the following day, stating he would seek new elections.[34] The next month, he was replaced byBodo Ramelow ofThe Left; the FDP did not run a candidate in the second vote for Minister-President.[35]
In November 2024,Christian Lindner was fired asMinister of Finance.[46] The FDP leaving the coalition meant thecollapse of the traffic light government.[47] With the crisis taking place the four ministries held by the party were lost, asMarco Buschmann andBettina Stark-Watzinger resigned.[48] However,Digital and Transport ministerVolker Wissing decided to resign from the FDP instead in order to stay in cabinet.[49] On the same month controversy was sparked afterDie Zeit andSüddeutsche Zeitung reported that the crisis was in fact a deliberate strategy by the FDP, planned for weeks in advance, in a paper with heavy use of militaristic terminology, including the wordD-Day, a reference to allied invasion of Normany during WWII.[50] The reports contradicted declarations by the party leader Lindner on Scholz "calculated break" of the governing coalition.[51]
The FDP is a predominantly classical-liberal inspired party, both in the sense of supportingfree market economic policies and in the sense of policies emphasizing the minimization of government interference in individual affairs.[85] During election campaigning, the party has emphasised support fortax cuts, reductions ingovernment spending andbalanced budgets.[86] The party has also been described by various media sources asneoliberal.[91] Scholars of political science have historically identified the FDP as closer to theCDU/CSU bloc than to theSocial Democratic Party of Germany (SPD) on economic issues but closer to the SPD andthe Greens on issues such ascivil liberties, education, defense, and foreign policy.[92] The FDP has oriented itself towards a centrist position between the CDU and the SPD;[93] however, it is to the right of the CDU in itssocioeconomics perspective,[94]environmental andlabour policies.[64]
During the2017 federal election, the party called for Germany to adopt an immigration channel using a Canada-stylepoints-based immigration system; spend up to 3% of GDP on defense and international security; phase out thesolidarity surcharge tax (which was first levied in 1991 to pay for the costs of absorbingEast Germany afterGerman reunification); cut taxes by 30 billioneuro (twice the amount of the tax cut proposed by the CDU); and improve road infrastructure by spending 2 billion euro annually for each of the next two decades, to be funded by selling government stakes inDeutsche Bahn,Deutsche Telekom, andDeutsche Post.[107] The FDP also called for the improvement of Germany's digital infrastructure, the establishment of a Ministry of Digital Affairs, and greater investment in education.[82]
The party supportsreplacement migration in response to the decline and aging of Germany's population. In 2020,Christian Dürr said that Germany should accept 500,000 immigrants per year.[108] The party also supports allowingdual citizenship (in contrast to theCDU/CSU, which opposes it) but also supports requiring third-generation immigrants to select a single nationality.[82]
In 1940s and 1950s, the FDP was the only German party strongly in favour of market economy, while the CDU/CSU was still adhering to a "third way" between capitalism and socialism. Initially founded as a party uniting liberals and nationalists,[103] the early FDP wanted former Nazis to be reintegrated into society and demanded a release ofNazi war criminals.[119]
The party's membership has historically been largely male; in 1995, less than one-third of the party's members were women, and in the 1980s women made up less than one-tenth of the party's national executive committee. By the 1990s, the percentage of women on the FDP's national executive committee rose to 20%.[120]
The party tends to draw its support from professionals and self-employed Germans.[121][122] It lacks consistent support from avoting bloc, such as the trade union membership that supports the SPD or the church membership that supports the CDU/CSU,[121] and thus has historically only garnered a small group ofStammwähler (core voters) who consistently vote for the party.[123][124]
In the2021 elections, the FDP was the second-most popular party among voters under age 30; among this demographic, the Greens won 22% of the vote, the FDP 19%, the SPD 17%, the CDU/CSU 11%, Die Linke 8%, and the AfD 8%.[125][126] According toDeutsche Welle in 2021, voters for both the FDP and the Greens are similar in being younger, politically centrist professionals living in cities, unlike left working-class voters and right Christian voters.[127]
Below are charts of the results that the FDP has secured in each election to the federalBundestag. Timelines showing the number of seats and percentage of party list votes won are on the right.
Stephen Padgett (1989)."The Party System". In Gordon Smith; William E. Paterson; Peter H. Merki (eds.).Developments in West German Politics. Springer. p. 133.ISBN978-1-349-20346-8.
^Mintzel, Alf (1976). Staritz, Dietrich (ed.).Besatzungspolitik und Entwicklung der bürgerlichen Parteien in den Westzonen (1945–1949). Leske + Budrich. p. 79.
^abWeipert, Matthias (2009)."Verantwortung für das Allgemeine"? Bundespräsident Theodor Heuss und die FDP. Stuttgart: Stiftung Bundespräsident-Theodor-Heuss-Haus.ISBN978-3-9809603-7-3.
^Donald P. Green; Bradley Palmquist; Eric Schickler, eds. (2002).Partisan Hearts and Minds: Political Parties and the Social Identities of Voters. Yale University Press. p. 188.ISBN978-0-300-13200-7.In Germany, the centrist FDP has often held the balance of power in coalition governments, allying with either the SPD or the CDU/ CSU.
^"AfD takes hard-right nationalism to heart of German democracy".Financial Times. 24 September 2017. Retrieved16 February 2023.Christian Lindner, head of the centrist FDP party, said that from his experience in his home state, North Rhine-Westphalia, whenever it came to tough work of drawing up laws, "the AfD MPs were always to be found in the cafeteria".
^"German Greens, FDP cosy up as coalition dance begins".Reuters. 7 September 2020. Retrieved27 January 2023.Both the centre-left SPD and Chancellor Angela Merkel's conservative bloc, which slumped to a record low result, would need the centre-right FDP and leftist Greens as partners to get a parliamentary majority for a coalition government.
^André Krouwel (2020)."Political Parties". In Neil Robinson; Rory Costello (eds.).Comparative European Politics: Distinctive Democracies, Common Challenges. Oxford University Press. p. 50.ISBN978-0-19-881140-4.
^abImmerfall, Stefan; Sobisch, Andreas (1997). "Party System in Transition". In Zimmer, Matthias (ed.).Germany: Phoenix in trouble?. Edmonton: University of Alberta. p. 114.ISBN978-0-88864-305-6.
^abGunlicks, Arthur B. (2003).The Länder and German federalism. Manchester: Manchester University Press. p. 268.ISBN978-0-7190-6533-0.
^abM. Donald Hancock et al.,Politics in Europe (CQ Press, 2015), pp. 265–66.
^Emilie van Haute; Caroline Close, eds. (2019).Liberal parties in Europe.... the classical-liberal German FDP, which has tried to keep a centrist position between the CDU/CSU and the SPD; the social-liberal D66; and the conservative-liberal Fiannal Fail (although it has recently tended to move towards a more ... )
^Louise K. Davidson-Schmich, "Amending Germany's Life Partnership Law: Emerging Attention to Lesbians' Concerns" inGender, Intersections, and Institutions: Intersectional Groups Building Alliances and Gaining Voice in Germany (ed. Louise K. Davidson-Schmich: University of Michigan Press, 2017), p. 216.
^Eve Hepburn,Using Europe: Territorial Party Strategies in a Multi-level System (Manchester University Press, 2013).
^Sebastian U. Bukow, "It's (not only) the Economy, Stupid?: Past and Future of the German Liberal Party" inLiberal Parties in Europe (eds. Emilie van Haute & Caroline Close: Routledge, 2019), p. 157.
^Christian Schweiger, "Germany" inThe 2009 Elections to the European Parliament (ed. Julia Lodge: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010), p. 129.
^Miki Caul Kittilson,Challenging Parties, Changing Parliaments: Women and Elected Office in Contemporary Western Europe (Ohio State University Press, 2006), pp. 94–95.
^abJoseph A. Biesinger,Germany: A Reference Guide from the Renaissance to the Present (Facts on File: 2006), p. 296.
^Stuart Parkes,Understanding Contemporary Germany (Routledge, 1997), p. 62.
^Christian Søe, "Neoliberal Stirrings: The 'New' FDP and Some Old Habits" inPower Shift in Germany: The 1998 Election and the End of the Kohl Era (ed. George K. Romoser), p. 59.
^"FDP: The return of the kingmaker".Deutsche Welle. 27 September 2021. Retrieved27 January 2023.The FDP's natural voters are the same as the Green party's — younger, politically centrist professionals living in cities, unmoored both from the traditional working-class voter base of the SPD and the traditional Christian voter base of the CDU.
Kirchner, Emil; Broughton, David (1988). "The FDP in the Federal Republic of Germany". In Kirchner, Emil (ed.).Liberal Parties in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 62–93.ISBN978-0-521-32394-9.
The Left: is currently only in the state parliaments ofBerlin, Bremen,Hamburg, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern,Saxony, Saxony-Anhalt, and Thuringia.
BSW: is currently only in the state parliaments of Berlin, Brandenburg, Rhineland-Palatinate, Saxony, and Thuringia.
FW: is currently only in the state parliaments ofBavaria, Rhineland-Palatinate and Saxony; does not participate in state elections inBrandenburg, an associated partyBVB/FW participates here.
.svg)
.svg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
