Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Francisco Sanches

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Portuguese philosopher
For other people with the same name, seeFrancisco Sanchez (disambiguation).
Francisco Sanches
Francisco Sanches
Bornc. 1550
DiedNovember 16,[1] 1623
Education
EducationCollege of Guienne
Philosophical work
EraRenaissance philosophy
RegionWestern philosophy
SchoolRenaissance skepticism[a]
InstitutionsUniversity of Toulouse
Notable ideas"Nothing is known"

Francisco Sanches (/ˈsɑːnɛs/;Spanish:[ˈsantʃes];c. 1550 – November 16, 1623) was aHispano-Portugueseskeptic,philosopher andphysician ofSephardi Jewish origin, born possibly inTui, Spain or probably inBraga, Portugal (where he was baptized and grew up).[4][5][6][7]

Early life and academic career

[edit]

In the auditorium of theUniversity of Toulouse there is a portrait of Francisco Sánchez, which bears the following inscription: "Francisco Sanchez Lusitanus". His father was the Spaniard Antonio Sanches,[8] also a physician; his mother Filipa de Sousa was Portuguese.[9][10] Being of Jewish origin, even if converted, he was legally considered aNew Christian.

He studied in Braga until the age of 12, when he moved toBordeaux with his parents, fleeing the surveillance of thePortuguese Inquisition. There he resumed his studies at theCollege de Guyenne. He went on to studymedicine inRome in 1569, and, back in France, inMontpellier andToulouse. He ended up, after 1575, as aprofessor of philosophy and medicine at theUniversity of Toulouse.

Main work and thought

[edit]

His house inToulouse

In hisQuod nihil scitur (That Nothing Is Known), written in 1576 and published in 1581, he used the classical skeptical arguments to show thatscience, in theAristotelian sense of giving necessary reasons or causes for the behavior of nature, cannot be attained: the search for causes quickly descends into an infinite regress and so cannot give certitude. He also attacked demonstrations in the forms ofsyllogisms, arguing that the particular (the conclusion) is needed to have a conception of the general (the premises) and thus that syllogisms were circular and did not add to knowledge.[11]

Statue of Francisco Sanches, by Salvador Barata Feyo inBraga.

Perfect knowledge, if attainable, is the intuitive apprehension of each individual thing. But, he then argued, even his own notion of science (perfectknowledge of an individual thing) is beyond human capabilities because of the nature of objects and the nature of man. The interrelation of objects, their unlimited number, and their ever-changing character prevent their being known. The limitations and variability of man's senses restrict him to knowledge of appearances — the real substances cannot be known. In forming this last argument he drew on his experience of Medicine to show how unreliable oursense experience is.[11]

Sanches' first conclusion was the usual fideistic one of the time, that truth can be gained by faith. His second conclusion was to play an important role in later thought: just because nothing can be known in an ultimate sense, we should not abandon all attempts at knowledge but should try to gain what knowledge we can, namely, limited, imperfect knowledge of some of those things with which we become acquainted through observation, experience, and judgment. The realization thatnihil scitur ("nothing is known") thus can yield some constructive results. This early formulation of "constructive" or "mitigated" skepticism was to be developed into an important explication of the new science byMarin Mersenne,Pierre Gassendi, and the leaders of theRoyal Society.

Reproduction of Francisco Sanches' signature as found in his diploma from the University of Montpellier. It reads, inLatin,Franciscus Sanches Bracharensis, or Francisco Sanches of Braga. From the statue by Salvador Barata Feyo.

Works

[edit]
  • Carmen de Cometa, 1577.
  • Quod nihil scitur, 1581.
  • De divinatione per somnum, ad Aristotelem, 1585.
  • Opera Medica, 1636, which includes:
    • De Longitudine et Brevitate vitae, liber
    • In lib. Aristotelis Physiognomicon, Commentarius
    • De Divinatione per Somnum
    • Quod Nihil Scitur, liber
  • Tractatus Philosophici, 1649.

Translations

[edit]
  • Sanchez, Franciscus (2007),Daß nichts gewußt wird – Quod nihil scitur, Hamburg: Meiner Verlag,ISBN 978-3-7873-1815-5 – Latin-German. Introduction and Notes by Kaspar Howald. Translated by Damian Caluori and Kaspar Howald. Latin Text by Sergei Mariev. PhB 586. 2007.
  • Sanchez, Francisco; Limbrick, Elaine. Introduction, Notes, and Bibliography; Thomson, Douglas F.S. Latin text established, annotated, and translated. (1988),That Nothing is Known, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,ISBN 0-521-35077-8{{citation}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) – Critical edition ofQuod nihil scitur.
  • Sanchez, Francisco; Buccolini, C., Lojacono, E. Latin text and Italian translation, with Introduction, Notes, and Bibliography (2011),Tutte le opere filosofiche, Milano: Bompiani,ISBN 9788845267246{{citation}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link).
  • Sánchez, Francisco. 1991, Que nada se sabe. Introduction: Palacios, Fernando A. Spanish translation, Espasa Calpe, Madrid.ISBN 9788423972357

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^It is disputed whether Sanches belonged toles nouveaux pyrrhoniens of theRenaissance. Paganini argues that contrary to what has been conjectured, there is no evidence that his skepticism was the result of the then-new influence ofSextus Empiricus;[2] however, Damian Caluori argues that Sanches does belong to the Pyrrhonist tradition.[3]

Citations

[edit]
  1. ^João-Maria Nabais,A diáspora de Francisco Sanches, na busca da consciência do Eu. Assistente Hospitalar Graduado; Universidade de Lisboa, p. 359,online[dead link].
  2. ^Gianni Paganini, José R. M. Neto (ed.),Renaissance Scepticisms, Springer, 2008, p. 52.
  3. ^Caluori 2007.
  4. ^Elaine Limbrick and Douglas Thomson (ed),Quod nihil scitur, Cambridge University Press, 1988, pp. 4–5
  5. ^Henry G. Leeuwen (1963). The Problem of Certainty in English Thought 1630–1690. Springer: The Hague, vi.
  6. ^ Jacques Lezra (1997). Jacques Lezra. Stanford: Stanford University Press, p. 155
  7. ^Pérez, Rolando (2020),"Francisco Sanches", in Zalta, Edward N. (ed.),The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2020 ed.), Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, retrieved2020-05-05
  8. ^"Francisco Sánchez | Real Academia de la Historia".dbe.rah.es. Retrieved2021-05-10.
  9. ^Orden Jiménez, Rafael V. (2012).Francisco Sánchez, el Escéptico. Breve historia de un filósofo desenfocado(PDF) (in Spanish).
  10. ^Francisco Sanches (ca 1551-1623) Filósofo, matemático e médicoBiblioteca Nacional de Portugal (inPortuguese)
  11. ^abPopkin, Richard H.,The History of Scepticism, from Erasmus to Spinoza, University of California Press: Berkeley, 1979,ISBN 0-520-03876-2

References

[edit]
  • BRITO, Alberto Moreira da Rocha,Francisco Sanches, médico, professor e pedagogo. Braga: Bracara Augusta, 1952.
  • CALUORI, Damian, 'The Scepticism of Francisco Sanchez'.Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 89 (2007): 30–46[1].
  • CARVALHO, Joaquim de,Introdução a Francisco Sanches, in Francisco Sanches,Opera Philosophica, Coimbra, 1955.
  • PÉREZ, Rolando. "Francisco Sanches". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy[2]. First published March 31, 2020.
  • PINTO, Sérgio da Silva,Braga et Francisco Sanches: discours prononcé à l'Université de Toulouse, à la séance solennele des commemorations du IVème centenaire de Francisco Sanches, le 12 Juin 1951, Braga: Cruz, 1951.
  • PINTO, Sérgio da Silva,Francisco Sanches, português, Braga: Bracara Augusta, 1952.
  • PINTO, Sérgio da Silva,Francisco Sanches, vida e obra, Braga 1952.
  • SÁ, Artur Moreira de,Raízes e projecção do pensamento de Francisco Sanches, Braga: University of Braga, 1955.
  • SÁ, Artur Moreira de,Francisco Sanches, Filósofo e Matemático, Lisboa, 1947.
  • SILVA, Lúcio Craveiro da,Actualidade de Francisco Sanches,Francisco Sanches Filósofo, andFrancisco Sanches nas correntes do pensamento renascentino, inEnsaios de Filosofia e Cultura Portuguesa, Braga, 1994.
  • TAVARES, Severino, Lúcio Craveiro da SILVA, Diamantino MARTINS and Luís de PINA,Francisco Sanches, no IV centenário do seu nascimento, Braga: University of Braga, 1951.
  • VV.AA.,Sanches au tournant de la pensée de la renaissance, Sep. Colloque-L'humanisme portugais et l'Europe, Paris: Fondation Calouste Gulbenkian, Centre Culturel Portugais, 1984.

External links

[edit]
Types
Philosophers
Indian
Pre-Socratic
Atomist
Academic skeptics
Pyrrhonists
Scholasticism
Renaissance
Humean
Concepts
Skeptical scenarios
Responses
Literature
International
National
People
Other
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Francisco_Sanches&oldid=1334742255"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp