Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corp. v. Wall-Street.com

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

2019 United States Supreme Court case
Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corp. v. Wall-Street.com
Argued January 8, 2019
Decided March 4, 2019
Full case nameFourth Estate Public Benefit Corporation, Petitioner v. Wall-Street.com, LLC, et al.
Docket no.17-571
Citations586U.S. ___ (more)
139 S. Ct. 881; 203L. Ed. 2d 147; 129U.S.P.Q.2d 1453
Case history
PriorMotion to dismiss granted,No. 0:16-cv-60497 (S.D. Fla. Mar. 23, 2016); affirmed, 856F.3d1338, 122U.S.P.Q.2d 1586 (11th Cir. 2017);cert. granted, 138 S. Ct. 2707 (2018).
Holding
A registration certificate must be provided before a lawsuit can be filed.
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
Clarence Thomas ·Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Stephen Breyer ·Samuel Alito
Sonia Sotomayor ·Elena Kagan
Neil Gorsuch ·Brett Kavanaugh
Case opinion
MajorityGinsburg, joined byunanimous

Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corp. v. Wall-Street.com, 586 U.S. ___ (2019), is aSupreme Court of the United States case in which the Court unanimously ruled that acopyright infringement suit must wait until thecopyright is successfullyregistered by theUnited States Copyright Office.[1]

Background

[edit]

While theCopyright Act of 1976 grants automatic copyright privileges to an author when it is published to the public, the Act also requires "registration" of that copyright with the Copyright Office before bringing an infringement suit if the author is American.[2] There had been a Circuit split about whether this "registration" required the Copyright Office to grant or deny the certificate of registration, or whether applying for the certificate could qualify as registration. Somecircuit courts, such as theEleventh andTenth, held that is considered registered upon the copyright's approval by the Copyright Office, known as the "registration approach." Others, including theNinth andFifth Circuits, held that registration occurs upon the application for registration, with the associateddeposit and fee; this was known as the "application approach."[1][3]

Fourth Estate wrote articles and licensed them for publication by other entities. One of their clients, Wall-Street.com, cancelled their licensing arrangement, and the license required Wall-Street.com to remove the content from their site, which they refused to do. Fourth Estate sued for copyright infringement, after having submitted their application for registration but without having waited for the registration to be approved. TheUnited States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit[4] ruled that the infringement suit could not be brought because of that lack of approval.[5][6]

Supreme Court

[edit]

The case was grantedcertiorari by the Supreme Court, with oral arguments heard on January 9, 2019.[7] Fourth Estate was represented at oral arguments by Aaron M. Panner.[8] Peter K. Stris[9] represented Wall-Street and Jerrold Burden.

Fourth Estate contended that the Eleventh Circuit misread the statute, and believed that the requirement of "registration" refers to the action of the copyright holder, and not an action of the Copyright Office. Further, they contended normatively that a copyright holder's rights should not depend upon affirmative government action.[1]

The court ruled on March 4, 2019, that a registration certificate must be provided before a lawsuit can be filed.[10][11]

Comments on the decision

[edit]

It has been observed by one commentator that a decision in Fourth Estate's favor would essentially remove the Copyright Office's role in the process of moving copyright infringement cases to litigation,[1] and concerns about the practical implications of litigating prior to the Register's grant or denial of registration were a prominent theme at the oral arguments.[12]

Others have observed that the practical effect is minimal, since although the turnaround time for a registration with the Copyright Office can be months at a time, the Office offers an $800 expedited review process for cases with "compelling needs" like upcoming lawsuits,[3] and offers preregistration for categories of works more likely to be infringed.[11] Moreover, plaintiffs can recover for any losses accrued from infringement, even while waiting for the examination to be complete.[11]

The decision applies only to filing copyright litigation, and does not apply to other forms of enforcement, such as sending demand letters or issuing DMCA Section 512 takedown notices.

References

[edit]
  1. ^abcdPottinger, Nicole E. (July 20, 2018)."A (Brief) Overview of Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corporation v. Wall-Street.com, LLC".Kentucky Law Journal. RetrievedJuly 27, 2018.
  2. ^17 U.S.C. § 412
  3. ^abWharton, Jake (June 28, 2018)."Supreme Court to Resolve Copyright Registration Circuit Split".IPWatchdog.com. RetrievedJuly 27, 2018.
  4. ^Wall-Street.Com and Burden were represented by attorney David A. Geller at the Trial Court and 11th Circuit Court of Appeals.
  5. ^Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corp. v. Wall-Street.com,856 F.3d 1338 (11th Cir. 2017).
  6. ^McCall, Angélique (July 22, 2018)."US Supreme Court Tackles Copyright Registration Circuit Split".IPWatchdog.com. RetrievedJuly 24, 2018.
  7. ^Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corp. v. Wall-Street.com, 138 S. Ct. 2707 (2018).
  8. ^"US Supreme Court Grants Review for Certiorari in Fourth Estate v Wall-Street".Fourth Estate. June 28, 2018. RetrievedJuly 30, 2018.
  9. ^"U.S. Supreme Court Grants Review in Fourth Estate v. Wall-Street.com, Peter Stris to Argue".Stris & Maher LLP. June 28, 2018. RetrievedJuly 27, 2018.
  10. ^Ernesto (March 5, 2019)."Rightsholders Can't Sue Without a Copyright Certificate, Supreme Court Rules".TorrentFreak. Archived fromthe original on March 5, 2019. RetrievedMarch 5, 2019.
  11. ^abcFourth Estate Public Benefit Corp. v. Wall-Street.com, No.17-571,586U.S. ___ (2019).
  12. ^Jessica Litman,"Argument analysis: Justices wade deep into the copyright weeds",SCOTUSBlog, Jan. 9, 2019.

External links

[edit]
Presentment Clause of Section VII
Commerce Clause of Section VIII
Dormant Commerce Clause
Others
Coinage Clause of Section VIII
Legal Tender Cases
Copyright Clause of Section VIII
Copyright Act of 1790
Patent Act of 1793
Patent infringement case law
Patentability case law
Copyright Act of 1831
Copyright Act of 1870
Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890
International Copyright Act of 1891
Copyright Act of 1909
Patent misuse case law
Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914
Lanham Act
Copyright Act of 1976
Othercopyright cases
Otherpatent cases
Othertrademark cases
Legal Tender Cases
Others
Compact Clause of Section X
Statutes
Pre-1976
1970s
1980s
1990s
2000s
2010s
2020s
Precedents
and rulings
Supreme Court
Appeals courts
Lower courts
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fourth_Estate_Public_Benefit_Corp._v._Wall-Street.com&oldid=1180564698"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp