Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Foothill Extension

Route map:
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Light rail extension project in Los Angeles County, California

 Foothill Extension A Line
Overview
StatusPhase 2A: Complete
Phase 2B to Pomona: Complete
Phase 2B to Claremont: In planning
Phase 2B to Montclair: On hold
LocaleLos Angeles,Pasadena,Azusa,Pomona
Termini
Stations6 (Phase 2A)
4 (Phase 2B to Pomona)
1 (Phase 2B to Claremont)
1 (Phase 2B to Montclair)
Service
TypeLight rail
SystemLos Angeles Metro Rail
Operator(s) Los Angeles Metro
History
Planned opening2031 (2031) (Phase 2B to Claremont)
TBD (Phase 2B to Montclair)
OpenedMarch 5, 2016; 9 years ago (2016-03-05) (Phase 2A)
September 19, 2025; 2 months ago (2025-09-19) (Phase 2B to Pomona)
Technical
Line length11.5 mi (18.5 km) (Phase 2A)[1]
9.1 mi (14.6 km) (Phase 2B to Pomona)[2]
2 mi (3.2 km) (Phase 2B to Claremont)[2][3]
1.2 mi (1.9 km) (Phase 2B to Montclair)[2][3]
Track gauge4 ft 8+12 in (1,435 mm)
ElectrificationOverhead line750 V DC
Route map
Map Phase 2A highlighted in red, 2B to Pomona in purple, 2B to Claremont in green, 2B to Montclair in blue
Show interactive map
Montclair
Metrolink (California)
Up arrowPhase 2B to Montclair (TBD)
Down arrowPhase 2B to Claremont (2031)
Claremont
Metrolink (California)
Up arrowPhase 2B to Claremont (2031)
Down arrow Phase 2B to Pomona (2025)
Pomona North
Metrolink (California)
La Verne/Fairplex
San Dimas
Glendora
Up arrow Phase 2B to Pomona (2025)
Down arrow Phase 2A (2016)
APU/Citrus College
Azusa Downtown
Irwindale
Duarte/City of Hope
Monrovia
Arcadia
Sierra Madre Villa

All stations
are accessible
Handicapped/disabled access
Parking
All stations
have parking
This diagram:
Show route diagram

TheFoothill Extension (formerly theGold Line Foothill Extension) is a construction project extending thelight railA Line, a part of theLos Angeles Metro Rail system. The project begins at the former terminus of the formerGold Line atSierra Madre Villa station inPasadena and continues east through the "Foothill Cities" ofLos Angeles County. The plan's first stage, "Phase 2A", extended the then-Gold Line toAPU/Citrus College station inAzusa; it opened on March 5, 2016. The first part of "Phase 2B" extended the now A Line a further four stations toPomona North station on theMetrolinkSan Bernardino Line inPomona, thereby returning passenger rail service to the full right of way originally built out by theLos Angeles and San Gabriel Valley Railroad in 1887. It broke ground in December 2017 and opened on September 19, 2025.

The second part of Phase 2B will further extend the line east to theClaremont San Bernardino Line station. Construction is expected to break ground in 2027 and be completed in 2031.

The corridor extension is being planned, managed, and implemented by the Foothill Gold Line Construction Authority, simply known as Foothill Gold Line.[4][5] Thejoint powers authority is governed by appointees fromLos Angeles Metro, theSan Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA), the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments (SVGCOG), and the cities ofLos Angeles,South Pasadena, andPasadena. In addition to enhancing mobility in one of the most congested metropolitan areas in the United States, the 23.8-mile project (38.3 km) is seen as an economic catalyst for the region, generating 6,900 jobs during the construction phase and creating infill andtransit-oriented development opportunities.[6]

With theRegional Connector having opened on June 16, 2023,[7] the north (Pasadena–Azusa–Pomona) branch of the then-L/Gold Line was absorbed into theA Line, providing service from Long Beach via Downtown Los Angeles and Pasadena to Azusa.[8][9][10]

Route

[edit]
Map of the former L Line, with the Foothill Extension along the top. Note that Citrus Avenue station was eventually opened as part of Phase 2A asAPU/Citrus College station.

The entire 23.8-mile (38.3 km) route (Phase 2A and 2B) of the Foothill Extension follows the roadbed of the formerAtchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway'sSecond Division through the Foothill Cities. These cities are in the foothills south of theSan Gabriel Mountains, in the northernSan Gabriel andPomona valleys. Beginning at the formerGold Line terminus atSierra Madre Villa station inPasadena, the route extends roughly east, ending atMontclair Transcenter inMontclair, inSan Bernardino County. The route parallels several major roads and highways, including I-210 (Foothill Freeway),Huntington Drive, andFoothill Boulevard.[11]

Planning and Phase 2A

[edit]

The Foothill Extension was initially conceived as "Phase 2" of theGold Line, split into two parts, hence the numbering of its two phases. The route betweenLos Angeles andPasadena is considered "Phase 1". The Gold Line Construction Authority (now Foothill Gold Line), which took over the Phase 1 project from Metro in 1999, also coordinates the Phase 2 projects.

The initialdraft environmental impact report (DEIR) for the Gold Line Foothill Extension was completed in April 2006 and covered the entire corridor betweenSierra Madre Villa station in Pasadena andMontclair Transcenter inMontclair. The final environmental impact report (FEIR) study assessed two different construction options: anLRT Full Build alternative, which would complete the full extension to Montclair, and anLRT Build ToAzusa alternative, which would extend only to Azusa; this was dubbed Phase 2A. On February 28, 2007, the Construction Authority Board certified the final EIR and decided to complete the "LRT Build to Azusa" alternative.[12]

In October 2009, theLos Angeles Metro board of directors unanimously voted to include the Gold Line Foothill Extension in its long-range plan and approved funding for the construction and operation of Phase 2A. A groundbreaking ceremony for Phase 2A was held on June 26, 2010;[13] construction began the following summer and was completed in September 2015, with the extension entering service on March 5, 2016. The original project budget for Phase 2A was $690 million, including not only construction but also the purchase of vehicles, financing, administrative costs, mitigation, and other costs;[14] in March 2011, the Construction Authority requested a $45 million increase in total budget, to $735 million, to reflect updated cost estimates.[15] Phase 2A is 11.5 miles (18.5 km) long and included stations atArcadia,Monrovia,Duarte/City of Hope,Irwindale,Azusa Downtown, andAPU/Citrus College, as well as a newDivision 24 Maintenance and Storage Facility.[1]

Phase 2B

[edit]

Phase 2B is the project to extend the A Line from the Phase 2A terminus inAzusa east toMontclair. The final EIR was certified by the Foothill Gold Line Construction Authority (Foothill Gold Line) board in March 2013.[16]

Proposed station listing

[edit]
Montclair – proposed terminus of the line

Phase 2B is 12.3 miles (19.8 km) long and will take approximately 17.9 minutes to traverse.[11] The segment betweenAzusa andPomona is 9.1 miles (14.6 km) long and the segment between Pomona andMontclair is 3.2 miles (5.1 km) long.[2] The alignment will have six new Metro stations:Glendora;San Dimas;La Verne/Fairplex; andPomona North with a connection to theMetrolinkSan Bernardino Line;Claremont with a connection to the Metrolink San Bernardino Line; andMontclair with a connection to the Metrolink San Bernardino Line. Foothill Gold Line expects 17,800 riders by 2035.[17]

Status

[edit]

Planning for the Foothill Extension Phase 2B (AzusaMontclair) began in 2003, and significant work has been completed for the segment. The final EIR for the project was certified by the Foothill Gold Line board in March 2013, and advanced conceptual engineering began in 2014. On June 23, 2017, theLos Angeles Metro board of directors approved a $1.4 billion budget to extend theA Line (then theGold Line) fromAPU/Citrus College station inPasadena toClaremont station inClaremont, 11.5 miles (18.5 km) to the east.[18] However, officials inSan Bernardino County convinced planners to further continue the extension toMontclair Transcenter in Montclair, an additional 0.8 miles (1.3 km) to the east, saying the transit center made for a natural terminus for the line.[19] It is expected to cost an additional $70 million to extend the A Line fromClaremont to Montclair, across county lines.[20] Construction on Phase 2B of the Foothill Extension is split into two projects. Project 1 is the relocation of freight railroad tracks, which is complete. Project 2 is the construction of the light rail line itself theA Line utilizes.[21]

Full construction to Claremont and Montclair by 2028 depended on additional funding to be secured by October 2021.[22] However, on September 10, 2021, state funding was past due for constructing the route further east of Pomona. This pushed the opening date to Montclair back, as well as outright placing the 3.2-mile segment at risk of cancellation altogether.[23] However, Foothill Gold Line was persistent in seeking funding for the project.

On July 8, 2024,Governor of CaliforniaGavin Newsom and theCalifornia State Transportation Agency (CalSTA) announced the distribution of the first year of funding fromCalifornia State Senate Bill 125 (SB125).[24] Metro allocated $798 million of SB125 funding to complete theLos Angeles County portion of thePomona–Montclair segment. Courtesy of the state’s Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program (TIRCP), CalSTA released close to $500 million for the project, with the remainder of the $798 million to be allocated by the end of 2024. On July 11, 2024, the Foothill Gold Line board of directors unanimously voted to work withKiewit Corporation as their contractor to build the Pomona–Montclair segment. The project's construction contract award is set for spring 2025 and should take five years to complete and open in 2030.[25][26] On October 31, 2024, having received the total $798 million in funding from CalSTA, the Metro board of directors unanimously voted to transfer the funds to Foothill Gold Line. Additionally, theSan Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA) has set aside $80 million in funding to directly fund the construction of the approximately 1-mile-long (1.6 km) segment of the extension withinSan Bernardino County, matching the project's current total estimated cost of $878 million.[27] However, on March 26, 2025, Foothill Gold Line canceled their bid with Kiewit due to the final bid remaining hundreds of millions of dollars above expert estimates and available funding.[28] If a new bid is accepted by October 15, 2025, construction will begin in 2027 with an updated completion date of 2031.[29] However, at a board meeting on September 3, 2025, the SBCTA board of directors voted to divest the $37 million it had allocated to the 0.65-mile-long (1.05 km) segment of the Pomona–Montclair segment within San Bernardino County, redirecting the funds to other uses due to rising costs and limited local input.[30][31][32] The decision placed the Claremont–Montclair segment on indefinite hold, while the Pomona–Claremont segment remained unaffected and is scheduled to be constructed independently of it.[33][34]

Construction

[edit]

On December 2, 2017, officials broke ground for Phase 2B in a ceremony atCitrus College. The cost of the project was estimated at $1.5 billion.[35] Completion of Phase 2B (including Montclair Transcenter) was expected by early 2026.[21] On July 10, 2020, major construction began on Phase 2B, building four stations from Azusa to Pomona. The first part of the construction focused on reconstructing the 28 at-grade crossings and relocating utilities. Gladstone Street in San Dimas was the first one to begin.[36] Nearly all reconstructions commenced and finished in late 2022. As of June 2023, the at-grade crossing reconstructions were complete.[37]

The freight/light rail bridges over channels and washes began in 2021, relocating and building new bridges to facilitate the freight and the A Line (then known as the L Line). These bridges were the first to finish as they didn't impact vehicular traffic. The light rail bridges, crossing major streets, began briefly. As required by theCalifornia Public Utilities Commission (CPUC), the light rail crossing at Foothill Blvd, Route 66, Lone Hill Blvd, and Bonita/Cataract Ave needed to be grade-separated (light rail only) with a flyover bridge. Those bridges feature the neighborhood's citrus design and includes local artwork. All of these components were complete by June 2023.[38]

The more complex component was the freight track relocation. The freight originally existed in the middle of the corridor, leaving no room for the light rail extension. To create space, the construction authority relocated it to the north side (south side west of Lone Hill Blvd) of the alignment. It was complete by October 2022.[39] With the relocation work finished, crews began work on the light rail system by installing theoverhead line, train control systems, and the light rail track. On June 24, 2023, an event held in La Verne culminated in the installation of the 230,630th rail clip (rail clips permanently attach the steel rail to the concrete railroad ties), officially completing major construction for the new light rail tracks from Glendora to Pomona.[40]

The extension to Pomona reached substantial completion on January 3, 2025. Following this, Foothill Gold Line transferred ownership of the segment to Metro, who conducted pre-revenue testing along the segment.[41] Pre-revenue testing lasted through August 2025, with the extension opening on September 19, 2025.[42]

Proposed extension to Ontario International Airport

[edit]

There has been past interest in extending theGold Line (now theA Line) fromMontclair Transcenter inMontclair toOntario International Airport. Currently, no active proposals exist to plan or construct this extension.

City of Ontario

[edit]

In 2006, when the city ofOntario joined the Foothill Gold Line Construction Authority, city leaders pushed to further extend the line toOntario International Airport.[19]

On March 9, 2009, the city passed a resolution affirming their support for this extension. The extension would be 7.5 miles (12.1 km) in length.[43]

Studies

[edit]

In 2008, the Foothill Gold Line Construction Authority commissioned a study by KOA Corporation to determine the feasibility of such an extension, which they dubbed "Phase 2C."[44] The study found the extension would be feasible and provided several alignment alternatives. The extension would be between 7 miles (11 km) and 15 miles (24 km) and add up to four new stations, depending on the chosen alignment.[45]

In November 2014, theSan Bernardino Associated Governments (SANBAG), the precursor to theSan Bernardino County Transportation Authority (SBCTA), conducted a study focused on better servingOntario International Airport viapublic transport. Out of the six alternatives narrowed down from 32 that were more closely studied, one of these alternatives included "Alternative D-1", which proposed extending theGold Line fromMontclair Transcenter along theSan Bernardino Line until Cucamonga Creek, which the line would then follow to terminate at Ontario International Airport.[46]

In October 2018, theSouthern California Association of Governments (SCAG), in cooperation with the SBCTA and theLos Angeles Metro, conducted a transit and rail planning study for the corridor connecting the easternSan Gabriel Valley inLos Angeles County with the westernSan Bernardino Valley inSan Bernardino County.[47] This study considered two options for the "LRT Alternative", including extensions of the Gold Line to Ontario International Airport, the "Arterial Option" and the "Cucamonga Creek Option". The Arterial Option followed Indian Hill Boulevard andHolt Boulevard, while the Cucamonga Creek Option had the same routing as Alternative D-1 in the 2014 study.[48]

Legislative attempts

[edit]

In January 2020,California State AssemblymanChris Holden (D-Pasadena), representingCalifornia's 41st State Assembly district, introduced Assembly Bill AB 2011. The measure would have formed the West San Bernardino County Rail Construction Authority, which would have designed and constructed the extension from Montclair to Ontario International Airport.[49]

Holden would be aided byCalifornia State SenatorAnthony Portantino (D-La Cañada Flintridge), representingCalifornia's 25th senatorial district, who introduced his bill, SB 1390, on February 21, 2020, which went even further and would have transferred taxpayer funds and land owned by the SBCTA within the proposed railright of way to a state-created independent construction authority.

Bothstate legislators presented their bills to the SBCTA board of directors at the March 7, 2020, board meeting. The board voted to oppose both bills and passed a motion reasserting itself as the sole authority to plan, design, and build new mass transit projects inSan Bernardino County.[50] Despite this, both bills were supported by the Foothill Gold Line Construction Authority.[51]

Neither bill was able to pass the state legislature. On May 18, 2020, the SBCTA ceased negotiations on amemorandum of understanding (MoU) on the extension, following Holden committing against further action on his legislative proposal, killing these attempts at the project.[52]

Proposed alternative

[edit]
Main article:San Bernardino County Transportation Authority § Ontario Connector Project

As a cost-effective solution compared to the proposed extension, estimated at around $1–1.5 billion,[53] SBCTA andOntario International Airport are currently in the process of trying to implement a tunnel with autonomous, zero-emission vehicles on an "on-demand" basis from theMetrolinkSan Bernardino Line'sRancho Cucamonga station toOntario International Airport.[54]

Initially,The Boring Company proposed constructing a single 2.8-mile (4.5 km) tunnel similar to theLas Vegas Convention Center Loop that would cost $60 million.[53] However, the company eventually dropped out of the project because they refused to submit another refined proposal.[55]

Despite this, the SBCTA moved forward with plans on the project.[56] The new plans for the project include two 4.2-mile (6.8 km) tunnels that will cost roughly $492 million.[57] The SBCTA selectedHNTB as their new contractor to design, build, and maintain the project.[58]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ab"Pasadena to Azusa".Foothill Gold Line. RetrievedJuly 12, 2024.
  2. ^abcd"Glendora to Montclair".Foothill Gold Line. RetrievedJuly 12, 2024.
  3. ^abScauzillo, Steve (November 1, 2024)."LA Metro awards funding to extend light-rail line into San Bernardino County".Los Angeles Daily News.MediaNews Group. RetrievedNovember 2, 2024.
  4. ^"Foothill Gold Line (official project website)". Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension Construction Authority. RetrievedJanuary 12, 2022.
  5. ^"Gold Line Foothill Extension". Metro (LACMTA). RetrievedNovember 22, 2014.
  6. ^"Economic Impact Study: Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension Phase 2A"(PDF). Los Angeles Economic Development Corporation. January 11, 2010. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on November 10, 2012. RetrievedNovember 22, 2014.
  7. ^Von Quednow, Cindy (June 16, 2023)."Metro Regional Connector opens in Los Angeles, bringing more direct access to downtown".KTLA.Nexstar Media Group. Archived fromthe original on August 12, 2023. RetrievedJune 16, 2023.
  8. ^"Prepare for Our "Gold Line" to Be The "Blue Line"".ColoradoBoulevard.net. September 25, 2017. RetrievedNovember 22, 2018.
  9. ^"Regional Connector Transit Corridor".US Department of Transportation. January 20, 2015. RetrievedNovember 22, 2018.
  10. ^"The Metro Blue Line will soon be called the 'A Line' • Long Beach Post".lbpost.com. December 8, 2018. RetrievedDecember 12, 2018.
  11. ^ab"Gold Line Phase II Final Environment Impact Report: Chapter 2 - Alternatives"(PDF). Gold Line Foothill Construction Authority. February 2007. pp. 2–100. RetrievedNovember 22, 2014.
  12. ^"Board resolution to certify FEIR"(PDF). Gold Line Foothill Construction Authority. February 28, 2007. RetrievedSeptember 21, 2010.[permanent dead link]
  13. ^"Metro Gold Line Breaks Ground".KABC-TV. June 26, 2010.Archived from the original on June 29, 2011. RetrievedSeptember 21, 2010.
  14. ^"Project Overview and Status, presentation to the Design-Build Institute of America"(PDF). March 10, 2010. RetrievedSeptember 21, 2010.[permanent dead link]
  15. ^"Gold Line Foothill Extension"(PDF). Archived fromthe original(PDF) on April 7, 2012. RetrievedMarch 23, 2011.
  16. ^"Azusa to Montclair Final EIR". Gold Line Foothill Construction Authority. RetrievedSeptember 2, 2014.
  17. ^Neal Broverman (August 21, 2012)."Plans Released for Gold Line Train to San Bernardino County".Curbed Los Angeles.Vox Media Inc. RetrievedJanuary 7, 2015.
  18. ^"Metro Gold Line Extension to Claremont Montclair". Curbed L.A. June 23, 2017.
  19. ^abStockstill, Mason."Ontario courts Gold Line extension".Inland Valley Daily Bulletin.Digital First Media.San Gabriel Valley Tribune. RetrievedSeptember 11, 2010.
  20. ^"Foothill Gold Line".www.foothillgoldline.org. Archived fromthe original on August 13, 2017. RetrievedAugust 13, 2017.
  21. ^ab"Glendora to Montclair Work Plan"(PDF).Foothill Gold Line. RetrievedAugust 13, 2017.
  22. ^"Major Construction Begins on Foothill Gold Line Extension Project". NBC Los Angeles. July 10, 2020. RetrievedAugust 18, 2020.
  23. ^Scauzillo, Steve (September 10, 2021)."Hopes Dashed for Light Rail Line Extension From Pomona to Montclair".Los Angeles Daily News.MediaNews Group.Daily Bulletin. RetrievedSeptember 10, 2021.
  24. ^"Nearly $2 billion going to California public transit".Governor of California - CA.gov. July 8, 2024. RetrievedJuly 11, 2024.
  25. ^Scauzillo, Steve (July 8, 2024)."State funds Pomona-to-Montclair light rail, first LA Metro project to San Bernardino County".Los Angeles Daily News.MediaNews Group. RetrievedJuly 9, 2024.
  26. ^Scauzillo, Steve (July 11, 2024)."Board picks potential firm to build Pomona-to-Montclair light rail extension".Los Angeles Daily News.MediaNews Group.San Gabriel Valley Tribune. RetrievedJuly 12, 2024.
  27. ^Scauzillo, Steve (November 1, 2024)."LA Metro awards funding to extend light-rail line into San Bernardino County".Los Angeles Daily News.MediaNews Group. RetrievedNovember 2, 2024.
  28. ^Levy Buch, Lisa (March 26, 2025)."Construction Authority Announces New Plan to Deliver Pomona to Montclair Project"(PDF) (Press release). Foothill Gold Line. RetrievedJuly 25, 2025.
  29. ^Scauzillo, Steve (August 26, 2025)."Report: Montclair extension of A Line in San Bernardino County to add jobs, boost economy".Los Angeles Daily News.MediaNews Group. RetrievedAugust 28, 2025.
  30. ^Alonzo, Andrew (September 4, 2025)."Gold Line bombshell: Claremont to Montclair segment in limbo".Claremont Courier. RetrievedSeptember 21, 2025.
  31. ^Yarbrough, Beau (September 3, 2025)."San Bernardino County transportation agency votes down Montclair light-rail extension".Inland Valley Daily Bulletin. Ron Hasse. RetrievedSeptember 4, 2025.
  32. ^Sharp, Steven (September 9, 2025)."Foothill extension to Montclair dealt a setback".Urbanize LA. Urbanize Media. RetrievedSeptember 12, 2025.
  33. ^Levy Buch, Lisa (September 12, 2025)."Claremont and Montclair Segments to Be Built Separately"(PDF) (Press release). Foothill Gold Line. RetrievedSeptember 24, 2025.
  34. ^Scauzillo, Steve (September 17, 2025)."Why did San Bernardino County kill the A Line extension to Montclair?".Los Angeles Daily News.MediaNews Group. RetrievedSeptember 21, 2025.
  35. ^"Extension of Gold Line rail system to San Bernardino County breaks ground".Los Angeles Times. December 2017. RetrievedDecember 2, 2017.
  36. ^"Foothill Gold Line E-News Update – Major Construction Begins July 10: Full Closure of Gladstone Street at Railroad Crossing in San Dimas (July 10 - Sept. 30)".Foothill Gold Line. RetrievedJanuary 4, 2025.
  37. ^"Foothill Gold Line E-News Update – 2022 Year-End Review; What to Expect in 2023".Foothill Gold Line. RetrievedJanuary 6, 2023.
  38. ^"Project Progress - Q2 2023".YouTube. Foothill Gold Line. June 14, 2023. RetrievedJune 15, 2023.
  39. ^"Foothill Gold Line E-News Update – October 2022 Project and Community Updates".Foothill Gold Line. RetrievedJanuary 6, 2023.
  40. ^"Video, Photo & Media Recap: Completion of Major Work on New Light Rail Track System from Glendora to Pomona".I Will Ride Blog. June 27, 2023. RetrievedAugust 3, 2023.
  41. ^"Foothill Gold Line from Glendora to Pomona Reaches Substantial Completion"(PDF) (Press release). Foothill Gold Line. January 3, 2025. RetrievedJanuary 3, 2025.
  42. ^Schlepp, Travis (September 19, 2025)."LA Metro's long-awaited Pomona extension welcomes first riders".KTLA.Nexstar Media Group. RetrievedSeptember 19, 2025.
  43. ^"A Resolution Supporting The Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension Project". March 3, 2009. Archived fromthe original on July 18, 2011. RetrievedSeptember 21, 2010.
  44. ^"Foothill Authority Website, Phase 2C, Montclair to Ontario". January 4, 2011. Archived fromthe original on May 22, 2011. RetrievedJanuary 4, 2011.
  45. ^"Strategic Planning Study Report for Metro Gold Line Foothill Extension to LA/Ontario International Airport"(PDF).San Bernardino County Transportation Authority. RetrievedJuly 12, 2024.
  46. ^"Ontario Airport Rail Access Study FINAL REPORT"(PDF).San Bernardino County Transportation Authority. RetrievedJuly 12, 2024.
  47. ^"Los Angeles-San Bernardino Inter-County Transit and Rail Study".Southern California Association of Governments. October 21, 2020. RetrievedJuly 12, 2024.
  48. ^"Los Angeles and San Bernardino Inter-County Transit and Rail Connectivity Study Final Report"(PDF).Southern California Association of Governments. RetrievedJuly 12, 2024.
  49. ^Scauzillo, Steve (January 30, 2020)."Lawmaker pushes LA Metro Gold Line extension to Ontario Airport".Los Angeles Daily News.MediaNews Group.Daily Bulletin. RetrievedJuly 2, 2024.
  50. ^Scauzillo, Steve (March 7, 2020)."Tensions mount over rail access to Ontario airport".Los Angeles Daily News.MediaNews Group.Daily Bulletin. RetrievedJuly 12, 2024.
  51. ^Scauzillo, Steve (March 11, 2020)."Gold Line board warms to Ontario airport light-rail connection bill".Los Angeles Daily News.MediaNews Group.San Gabriel Valley Tribune. RetrievedJuly 12, 2024.
  52. ^"Ontario Airport Gold Line Connection - Project 'Derailed' by Transit Authority".South Pasadenan. May 18, 2020. RetrievedJuly 12, 2024.
  53. ^abScauzillo, Steve (May 27, 2020)."Elon Musk's Boring Co. proposes tunnel to Ontario airport as alternative to light-rail".Los Angeles Daily News.MediaNews Group.Daily Bulletin. RetrievedJuly 12, 2024.
  54. ^"ONT Connector Project".San Bernardino County Transportation Authority. RetrievedJuly 12, 2024.
  55. ^John, Darryn (July 20, 2022)."The Boring Company abandons plans for Ontario Airport loop in California".Drive Tesla. RetrievedOctober 4, 2022.
  56. ^"San Bernardino County moves forward with underground tunnel plan without Elon Musk".CBS News. July 28, 2022. RetrievedJuly 12, 2024.
  57. ^Lin, Summer (July 27, 2022)."Elon Musk abandoned plans for a four-mile tunnel at Ontario airport. Locals are picking it up".Los Angeles Times. RetrievedJuly 12, 2024.
  58. ^"HNTB selected by SBCTA for Ontario Airport tunnel project" (Press release).HNTB. January 27, 2021. Archived fromthe original on February 4, 2021. RetrievedJanuary 2, 2023.

External links

[edit]
Template:Attached KML/Foothill Extension
KML is not from Wikidata
A LineA Line
B LineB Line
C LineC Line
D LineD Line
E LineE Line
G LineG Line
J LineJ Line
K LineK Line
Services
Metro Rail
Light rail
Rapid transit
Metro Busway
Metro Bus
Other
Stations
Bus lanes
Capital projects
Under construction
Planned
Fleet
Other information
Rail
Bus
San Bernardino County
Riverside County
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Foothill_Extension&oldid=1321233050"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp