| Fisher Mound Group | |
|---|---|
  Location in United States Show map of the United States | |
| Location | Will County, Illinois |
| Coordinates | 41°19′17″N88°15′00″W / 41.32139°N 88.25000°W /41.32139; -88.25000 |
TheFisher Mound Group is a group ofburial mounds with an associated village site located on theDesPlaines River near its convergence with theKankakee River where they combine to form theIllinois River, inWill County, Illinois, about 60 miles southwest ofChicago. It is a multi-component stratified site representing severalPrehistoricUpper Mississippian occupations as well as minorLate Woodland and EarlyHistoric components.[1]
The site contains a total of 12 burial mounds, the main ones being the Big East Mound and the Big West Mound. Around the mounds are 50 house pits.[1]
George Langford, a mechanical engineer, located the site and excavated it for several years, eventually bringing it to the attention of the archaeological world. According to Langford, he first visited the site in 1898 and by 1906-1907 he was excavating on a small scale with the assistance of Howard Calmer.[1]
In 1922 the site began to be impacted by farming activities and Langford realized the loss of information that was taking place. This spurred him into large-scale excavations with his associate Albert Tennik, starting in 1924. In 1927 Langford issued the first site report. After Langford's work, additional excavations took place under the auspices of theUniversity of Chicago and theWPA.[1]
Excavations at the site yieldedPrehistoric andHistoricartifacts,burials, house structures, pitfeatures, animal bone and plant remains.[1]
Three distinctUpper Mississippian levels were observed in Langford's excavations, each with its own diagnostic artifacts, especially related to changes inpottery styles. There were also differences inskeletalmorphology, especially in the shape of theskull. J.W. Griffin in a 1948 paper referred to these levels as “Periods A, B and C”, with Period B having by far the most material.[2]
The surface soil formed a layer to a depth of 3 feet, which Langford called the “Upper Level”. Underneath was a one-inch layer of blackened soil which was called the “Black Seam”. Underneath the Black Seam was 1-1/2 feet of soil and gravel underlain by a 6-inch layer of white ashes, black charcoal, brown earth, bone and shell called the “Ash Layer”. Following these layers carefully, Langford was able to assign each burial to its correctstratigraphic level.[1]
The earliest phase is represented by several “long head” burials withoutgrave goods, in the gravel beneath the Upper Mississippian layers. The upper levels contain small amounts ofLate Woodland and Historic materials in disturbed contexts.[1][2] In between laid the Upper Mississippian deposits.
Period A represents the earliestUpper Mississippian phase represented at Fisher. It is located below the Ash Level close to and below the actual ground level. There are noradiocarbon dates available at the Fisher site, but comparisons with sites yielding similar artifacts with radiocarbon dates suggest a time period of approximately A.D. 1100–1300.[3]
The burials associated with Period A are extended burials with short high heads. Most of the pots have shell spoons and had a greasy texture and small fragments of bone, as if they originally contained food when they were buried.[1]
The primary diagnosticartifact of Period A is the distinctive shell-temperedcordmarked pottery with elaborate decoration originally termed “antler-point” pottery by Langford since he assumed the incised lines of decoration were applied in the wet clay by the tip of an antler prior to firing in thekiln. The predominant vessel form was globular with restricted orifice and vertical to excurved rim profile. Lips were frequently notched.[1][2][4]
The following non-pottery artifacts were recovered from the Period A deposits. Most of these weregrave goods. Significantly, bone artifacts outnumber stone artifacts in both Periods A and B:[1][2][4][5]
Period B corresponds to the deposits between the Black Seam and the Ash Layer. It dates to a time period of approximately A.D. 1200-1500 based on comparisons with sites yielding similar artifacts withradiocarbon dates.[6]
Theburials associated with Period B are extended burials with differing skull types: short high, long or round heads. Burials 115 and 116 in the Big East Mound contained a unique artifact and bone cache including 3 triangularprojectile points, 1 slender projectile point, 2tarsal bones fromturkey andheron, 2deer ankle bones, 2beaverincisors, amink jaw bone,bird bones andantler projectile points. Another skeleton was buried with 2 wildcathumeri, andotter,raccoon andminkskulls.[1]
The house structures present at Fisher are thought to be associated with Period B. They show signs of double-walled design and wall-trench construction like houses found associated with the Heally Component at theZimmerman site.[6]
The pottery from Period B was grit-tempered with predominantlycordmarked surface finish. Decoration was similar to the shell-tempered ware in Period A but less elaborate. Vessel form was similar except that lip notching was less frequent.[1]
The following non-potteryartifacts were recovered from the Period B deposits. Most of these weregrave goods:[1][2][4][5]
Period C corresponds to the deposits located above the Black Seam. This layer was not clearly demarcated from theLate Woodland andHistoric material above it; and in relation to cultural remains was not well-represented compared to the first two periods. Thepottery was grit-tempered like the previous period but undecorated. The only artifacts reported were chipped stoneprojectile points, shellbeads and boneharpoons. The time period for this phase is thought to be after approximately A.D. 1500.[1]
According to Langford, animal bone was common throughout the site.Deer bones predominated but other species were also represented such aselk,bear,dog, wildcat,otter,beaver,mink,weasel,skunk,raccoon,muskrat,rabbit,turkey,heron andgoose.[1] These remains were not modified into tools like the bone artifacts described elsewhere, and may be considered food remains or, in the case of some species, the remains of ceremonial activities or grave goods with spiritual significance. Dogsacrifice and dog meat consumption was observed to haveceremonial andreligious implications in earlyNative American tribes.[8][9] Bear ceremonialism has also been reported in Native American tribes of the American Midwest.[10] Finally, the bones of some animals were used inmedicine pouches as part of the practices of medicine societies such as theMidewiwin andFalse Face Society. The presence of species like mink, wildcat and heron, especially in burials, implies these bones may have been part of medicine bundles intended to accompany the deceased into the afterlife.[11]
Plant remains were not systematically collected in the Fisher excavations since the use offlotation techniques were not yet widely adopted. However, it was reported that large quantities ofmaize were recovered and there is little doubt that the Fisher inhabitants were anagricultural society, althoughhunting still provided for a large portion of theirsubsistence.[1]
Archaeologists often findpottery to be a very useful tool in analyzing aprehistoric culture. It is usually very plentiful at a site and the details of manufacture and decoration are very sensitive indicators of time, space and culture.[12]
Many complete or reconstructable vessels were found with the Fisher Mound burials, which greatly facilitated the artifact analysis.
In 1927 Langford described the pottery found in the threeUpper Mississippian levels, but it was not until 1948 that JW Griffin developed a detailedtypology. He called the shell-tempered pottery in Period A Fisher Ware, and the grit-tempered pottery in Periods B and C Langford Ware.[1][2]
TheUpper Mississippian Fisher Tradition is thought to have emerged after the establishment of the largeMiddle Mississippian city ofCahokia in the southern part ofIllinois in approximately A.D. 1050. The Cahokian culture probably exerted a great deal of influence on the surrounding communities, and recent evidence indicates it was Cahokia that introducedmaize agriculture to most of the eastern portion of North America.[13]
Fisher was first identified at the Fisher Mound Group but other sites have been found with similar material culture elsewhere inIllinois[11] as well as northernIndiana[3] and southwesternMichigan (where it is part of the Berrien Phase atMoccasin Bluff).[14] The presence of shell-tempered cordmarked pottery at theGriesmer andFifield sites in Indiana associated with a radiocarbon date of A.D. 1530 along with late-period artifacts implies that this tradition survived in some form almost until theProtohistoric and/or earlyHistoric Period. This could potentially mean that Fisher represents one of the historicNative American tribes encountered by the earlyEuropean explorers andfur traders.[3]
The material culture of theUpper Mississippian Langford Tradition has been identified at many sites in theKankakee,Des Plaines andIllinois River valleys inIllinois. It corresponds to the Heally Component at theZimmerman site,[7][15] and is also present at thePlum Island[5] andGentleman Farm[6] sites on the Illinois River near Zimmerman.
Radiocarbon dates of A.D. 1210-1490 have been reported for Langford, which makes it mostly contemporaneous with Fisher.[6]
The formation of Langford (like Fisher) may be related to the rise ofCahokia, and it has been noted that most Langford sites have small amounts ofMiddle Mississippian pottery in their assemblages.[6]
The Fisher site, which was first excavated over a century ago, was one of the first Upper Mississippian sites in Illinois to be investigated intensively by archaeologists. The stratified deposits present at the site aided in the development of a timeline for cultural timeline of the region. As a result, subsequent excavations at Upper Mississippian sites in the American Midwest were often analyzed through the typological framework developed at Fisher. Comparisons with other sites have helped archaeologists define the cultural identity of the Fisher and Langford Traditions and how they relate temporally and spatially with other Upper Mississippian cultures such as Huber andOneota.[14][3][4]
| Middle Mississippian |
| ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| South Appalachian Mississippian |
| ||||||||||
| Fort Walton culture | |||||||||||
| Pensacola culture | |||||||||||
| Plaquemine Mississippian | |||||||||||
| Caddoan Mississippian | |||||||||||
| Upper Mississippian cultures |
| ||||||||||
| Culture |
| ||||||||||
