Inancient Near Eastern cosmology, thefirmament was a celestial barrier that separated the heavenly waters above from the Earth below.[1] Inbiblical cosmology, the firmament (Hebrew:רָקִ֫יעַrāqīaʿ) was the vast soliddome created byGod during theGenesis creation narrative to separate theprimal sea into upper and lower portions so that the dry land could appear.[2][3]
The concept was adopted into the subsequent Classical and Medieval models ofheavenly spheres, but was dropped withadvances in astronomy in the 16th and 17th centuries. Today the word is sometimes used as a synonym for thesky or forheaven.
In English, the word "firmament" is recorded as early as 1250, in theMiddle English Story of Genesis and Exodus. It later appeared in theKing James Bible.[4] The same word is found inFrench andGerman Bible translations, all from the Latinfirmamentum (a firm object), used in theVulgate (4th century).[5] This in turn is acalque of the Greekστερέωμᾰ (steréōma), also meaning a solid or firm structure (Greekστερεός = rigid), which appears in theSeptuagint, the Greek translation made by Jewish scholars around 200 BC.
These words all translate theBiblical Hebrew wordrāqīaʿ (רָקִ֫יעַ), used for example in Genesis 1.6, where it is contrasted withshamayim (שָׁמַיִם), translated as "heaven(s)" in Genesis 1.1.Rāqīaʿ derives from the rootrqʿ (רָקַע), meaning "to beat or spread out thinly".[6][7] The Hebrew lexicographersBrown, Driver and Briggs gloss the noun with "extended surface, (solid) expanse (as ifbeaten out)" and distinguish two main uses: 1. "(flat) expanse (as if of ice), as base, support", and 2. "the vault of heaven, or 'firmament,' regarded by Hebrews as solid and supporting 'waters' above it."[8] A related noun,riqquaʿ (רִקּוּעַ), found in Numbers 16.38 (Hebrew numbering 17.3), refers to the process of hammering metal into sheets.[8]Gerhard von Rad explains:
Rāqīaʿ means that which is firmly hammered, stamped (a word of the same root in Phoenecian means "tin dish"!). The meaning of the verbrqʿ concerns the hammering of the vault of heaven into firmness (Isa. 42.5; Ps.136.6). The Vulgate translatesrāqīaʿ withfirmamentum, and that remains the best rendering.
— Gerhard von Rad[9]
A firmament is created according to theEnūma Eliš Babylonian creation myth.[10] In theHebrew Bible, it is mentioned in theGenesis creation narrative, thePsalms, and theBook of Isaiah. Between these two main sources, there is a fundamental agreement in the cosmological models pronounced: this included a flat and likely disk-shaped world with a solid firmament.[11][12]
The two prominent representations of the firmament were that it was either flat and hovering over the Earth, or that it was a dome and entirely enclosed the Earth's surface. Beyond the firmament is the upper waters, above which further still is the divine abode.[12] The gap between heaven and Earth was bridged byziggurats and these supported stairways that allowed gods to descend into the Earth from the heavenly realm. A Babylonian clay tablet from the 6th century BC illustrates a world map.[13]
Inancient Egyptian texts, and from texts across the near east generally, the firmament was described as having special doors or gateways on the eastern and western horizons to allow for the passage of heavenly bodies during their daily journeys. These were known as the windows of heaven or the gates of heaven.[14][15] In Egyptian texts particularly, these gates also served as conduits between the earthly and heavenly realms for which righteous people could ascend. The gateways could be blocked by gates to prevent entry by the deceased as well. As such, funerary texts included prayers enlisting the help of the gods to enable the safe ascent of the dead.[16] Ascent to the celestial realm could also be done by a celestial ladder made by the gods.[17]
Four different Egyptian models of the firmament and/or the heavenly realm are known. One model was that it was the shape of a bird: the firmament above represented the underside of a flying falcon, with the sun and moon representing its eyes, and its flapping causing the wind that humans experience.[18] The second was a cow, as per theBook of the Heavenly Cow. The cosmos is a giant celestial cow represented by the goddessNut orHathor. The cow consumed the sun in the evening and rebirthed it in the next morning.[19] The third is a celestial woman, also represented by Nut. The heavenly bodies would travel across her body from east to west. The midriff of Nut was supported byShu (the air god) andGeb (the earth god) lay outstretched between the arms and feet of Nut. Nut consumes the celestial bodies from the west and gives birth to them again in the following morning. The stars are inscribed across the belly of Nut and one needs to identify with one of them, or a constellation, in order to join them after death.[20] The fourth model was a flat (or slightly convex) celestial plane which, depending on the text, was thought to be supported in various ways: by pillars, staves, scepters, or mountains at the extreme ends of the Earth. The four supports give rise to the motif of the "four corners of the world".[21]
Prior to the systematic study of the cosmos by theIonian School in the city ofMiletus in the 6th century BC, the early Greek conception of cosmology was closely related to that of near eastern cosmology and envisioned a flat Earth with a solid firmament above the Earth supported by pillars. However, the work ofAnaximander,Anaximenes, andThales, followed by classical Greek theoreticians likeAristotle andPtolemy ushered in the notions of a spherical Earth and an Earth floating in the center of the cosmos as opposed to resting on a body of water. This picture wasgeocentric and represented the cosmos as a whole as spherical.[22]
One problem forChristian interpreters was in understanding the distinction between theheaven created on the first day and thefirmament created in the second day.Origen followed thecosmological dualism of the Hellenistic Jewish scholarPhilo of Alexandria, who proposed a distinction between the material and eternal creations but does not appear to have associated matter or materiality with evil.[23] Under Origen's influence the waters above became associated with the spiritual plane of Christian contemplative exercise and the waters below with the demonic and infernal.[24] The firmament is the boundary between the physical and spiritual worlds.[25]
Origen's model of two heavens was followed by later writers who kept the concept of a spiritual and immaterial heaven of the first day (caelum) and the corporeal/siderealfirmamentum.[26][27]
Various views on the materiality of the firmament emerged among theChurch Fathers, including that it had been made out of air, out of the four elements, or out of a yet-distinct fifth element.[28] In theHexaemeron of Basil of Caesarea the firmament is depicted as spherical or domed with a flat underside that formed a pocket or membrane in which the waters were held. Not all of the Church fathers followed Origen.[29][30]Manlio Simonetti notedBasil of Caesarea's "strong tone of criticism" of Origen's teaching.[31]
Appealing to a Platonic division between base matter and heavenly or spiritual matter,Augustine of Hippo would distinguish between the waters below the firmament and the waters above the firmament. This involved the spiritual interpretation of the upper waters. In this, he was followed byJohn Scotus Eriugena. InDe Genesi ad litteram (perhaps his least studied work) Augustine wrote: "only God knows how and why [the waters] are there, but we cannot deny the authority of Holy Scripture which is greater than our understanding".[32]
Ambrose struggled with understanding how the waters above the firmament could be held up given the spherical nature of the cosmos: the solution was to be sought in God's dominion over the cosmos, in the same way that God held up the Earth in the middle of the cosmos though it has no support.[33] About thisAmbrose wrote: "Wise men of the world say that water cannot be over the heavens".[34]
The debate about the waters being located above the heavens continued into theMiddle Ages. It made no sense under the explanations of the natural world proposed by Aristotle, recalling the statement from Augustine's literal commentary on Genesis: "Our business now, after all, is to inquire how God's Scriptures say he established things according to their proper natures."Scholastic theologians engaged in the pursuit of applying natural science to illuminate the sacred includedAlexander of Hales,William of Auxerre (who offered that the location of the waters as recorded by Moses could only be explained by a miracle),William of Auvergne, andPhilip the Chancellor.[35][36][28]
Whether the firmament was hard/firm or soft/fluid was also up for debate: the notion of a soft or fluid firmament was held until it was challenged in the 13th century by the introduction of the Aristotelian-Ptolemaic cosmos, a trend that would only culminate in the 16th century.[28]Bede reasoned that the waters might be held in place if they were frozen solid: thesiderum caelum (heaven of the celestial bodies) was made firm (firmatum) in the midst of the waters so should be interpreted as having the firmness of crystalline stone (cristallini Iapidis).[37]
A distinctive collection of ideas about the cosmos were drawn up and recorded in therabbinic literature, though the conception is rooted deeply in the tradition of near eastern cosmology recorded in Hebrew, Akkadian, and Sumerian sources, combined with some additional influences in the newer Greek ideas about the structure of the cosmos and the heavens in particular.[38] The rabbis viewed the heavens to be a solid object spread over the Earth, which was described with the biblical Hebrew word for the firmament,raki’a. Two images were used to describe it: either as a tent, or as a dome; the former inspired from biblical references, though the latter is without an evident precedent.[39] As for its composition, just as in cuneiform literature the rabbinic texts describe that the firmament was made out of a solid form of water, not just the conventional liquid water known on the Earth. A different tradition makes an analogy between the creation of the firmament and the curdling of milk into cheese. Another tradition is that a combination of fire and water makes up the heavens. This is somewhat similar to a view attributed to Anaximander, whereby the firmament is made of a mixture of hot and cold (or fire and moisture).[40] Yet another dispute concerned how thick the firmament was. A view attributed to R. Joshua b. R. Nehemiah was that it was extremely thin, no thicker than two or three fingers. Some rabbis compared it to a leaf. On the other hand, some rabbis viewed it as immensely thick. Estimates that it was as thick as a 50 year journey or a 500 year journey were made. Debates on the thickness of the firmament also impacted debates on the path of the sun in its journey as it passes through the firmament through passageways called the "doors" or "windows" of heaven.[41] The number of heavens or firmaments was often given as more than one: sometimes two, but much more commonly, seven. It is unclear whether the notion of the seven heavens is related to earlier near eastern cosmology or the Greek notion of the surrounding of the Earth by seven concentric spheres: one for the sun, one for the moon, and one for each of the five other (known) planets.[42] A range of additional discussions in rabbinic texts surrounding the firmament included those on the upper waters,[43] the movements of the heavenly bodies and the phenomena of precipitation,[44] and more.[45][46]
The firmament also appears in non-rabbinic Jewish literature, such as in the cosmogonic views represented in theapocrypha. A prominent example is in theBook of Enoch composed around 300 BC. In this text, the sun rises from one of six gates from the east. It crosses the sky and sets into a window through the firmament in the west. The sun then travels behind the firmament back to the other end of the Earth, from whence it could rise again.[47] In theTestament of Solomon, the heavens are conceived in a tripartite structure and demons are portrayed as being capable of flying up to and past the firmament in order to eavesdrop on the decisions of God.[48] Another example of Jewish literature describing the firmament can be found inSamaritan poetry.[49]
TheQuran describes a concrete[clarification needed] firmament above the Earth, built by God and lifted up:[50][51] the firmament is maintained not by any pillars but by God directly maintaining it, in a description resembling that of the Syriac theologianJacob of Serugh inhis Hexaemeron.[52] Another commonality between the two is in describing the firmament as being decorated by stars.[53] The heavens are analogized to a roof, structure, and edifice without crack or fissure. It is extremely broad and stretched, but it is also constantly broadening.[51] Though there has been some dispute over the exact shape of the Quranic firmament (primarily over whether it is flat or domed), the most recent study by Tabatabaʾi and Mirsadri favors a flat firmament.[54] In addition, there are seven heavens or firmaments[55][56] and they were made from smoke during the creation week, resembling the view ofBasil of Caesarea.[57]
The model established by Aristotle became the dominant model in the Classical and Medieval world-view, and even whenCopernicus placed the Sun at the center of the system he included an outer sphere that held the stars (and by having the earth rotate daily on its axis it allowed the firmament to be completely stationary).Tycho Brahe's studies of thenova of 1572 and theComet of 1577 were the first major challenges to the idea that orbs existed as solid, incorruptible, material objects,[58] and in 1584Giordano Bruno proposed a cosmology without a firmament: an infinite universe in which the stars are actually suns with their own planetary systems.[59] After Galileo began using a telescope to examine the sky it became harder to argue that the heavens were perfect, as Aristotelian philosophy suggested, and by 1630 the concept of solid orbs was no longer dominant.[58]
