The former headquarters of the Finnish Security and Intelligence Service inPunavuori, Helsinki
The Finnish Security and Intelligence Service (Supo) was established on 17 December 1948 upon ratification of the Act and the Decree on the Security Police and became operational at the start of 1949.[4] Supo was formed to replace its predecessor, theState Police (Valtiollinen poliisi, Valpo),[5] after communists suffered a defeat in theJuly 1948 parliamentary elections and the reorganization of Valpo was recommended by a governmental committee in October 1948. In essence, Valpo was abolished by theParliament of Finland due to the fact that its leadership positions had been filled bycommunists who were implicated in erroneous and illegal elements according to a separate governmental committee investigation as well as linked to a number of disappearances in the aftermath ofWorld War II.[6][7][8][9]
Old badge of Finnish Security and Intelligence ServiceRatakatu 12 in 1957
In general, Finland is described as having been in a strategic and neutral position between theCold War blocks; both sides engaged in intensive intelligence activities in the country. Mostly, Finland was an interest to the superpowers as a buffer zone and as an overflight and military transit route.[10] During the first decades, the main tasks of Supo were to monitor communists, such as theCommunist Party of Finland andhome Russians, and prevent illegal intelligence, especiallyKGB andGRU espionage. The Service had to work with discretion and caution due toFinlandization—a balance between theindependence of Finland andappeasement to the Soviet Union. At the same time, Supo had close connections with theCIA—although the Service was wary of recording it on paper.[5][7][11][12][13]
WhenUrho Kekkonen was elected thePresident of Finland in 1956, Supo started to transform more into a "presidential police" that gathered information to support the President's domestic and foreign policy decision-making. The shift was partly due to the tenseFinnish-Soviet relations at the time (see e.g. thenight frost andnote crises) as well as Kekkonen's motivation to steer the high-profile Service into alignment with his tactics in handling relations with theSoviet Union. For example, Kekkonen was kept informed of Finnish communist politicians and their internal discussions as well as was relayed information from foreign intelligence agencies, such as the BritishMI6. After Director Armas Alhava retired in 1972, Kekkonen appointed Arvo Pentti as the new Director—an ally and a fellow politician from theCentre Party. When Seppo Tiitinen was appointed the new Director in 1978, Kekkonen was still requesting information on political communist movements.[5][7][11][12][13][14]
Kekkonen kept KGB connections close, especially its local Helsinki chief, and utilized back channels to balance between Western and Soviet interests without provocation, such as during the negotiations on Finland's membership to theEuropean Free Trade Association in 1962. Similarly, he shifted Supo's counter-intelligence activities to quiet and preventive action. For example, espionage cases were sometimes not submitted to court and KGB diplomats were not declaredpersona non grata, but instead were quietly asked to leave. When KGB majorAnatoliy Golitsyn defected to the United States from Helsinki in December 1961, he divulged his knowledge and opinions on KGB networks and interaction in Finland to the CIA. For example, he described President Kekkonen as being "in Soviet service" – Kekkonen was relieved when the CIA and Western intelligence took the claim with reservations. Nevertheless, the revelations prompted Western intelligence to have a more constructive and positive attitude towards Finland and the CIA shared Golitsyn's list of KGBintelligence officers to Supo for monitoring.[5][7][13][15]
Systematic surveillance of communists was shut down in the early 1980s by PresidentMauno Koivisto.[9] The Service did not gainpowers of arrest and pre-trial investigation powers until 1 January 1989 due to its predecessors' colourful actions and history as well as Finland's sensitiveforeign policy position. Instead, theNational Bureau of Investigation carried out actual criminal investigations until that point.[5][7] In 1990,West German intelligence gave Supo theTiitinen list, which supposedly contains names of Finns who were believed to have links toStasi, the East German state security ministry. The list was classified and locked in a safe after Director Seppo Tiitinen and President Mauno Koivisto determined that it was based on vague hints instead of hard evidence.[16][17] Subsequently, in 2002 the Service suspected and questioned Finnish diplomat,Alpo Rusi, of being a Stasi spy. The investigation eventually leaked to national broadcasterYle. However, Rusi was cleared of all charges in 2007 after court proceedings and won compensation for damage to his reputation suffered when the case was leaked to the media.[18]
Former logo of the Finnish Security and Intelligence Service
The Service made a legislative initiative in 2012 to criminalize the espionage of exiles in Finland. As of April 2019, espionage of exiles was forbidden e.g. in Sweden, but not in Finland.[19] On 1 January 2016, Supo was transferred under the direct control of the Interior Ministry from the National Police Board. Reportedly, the administrative transfer was to ensure that the Service is able to more efficiently conduct its special missions as well as to reinforce its strategic and political direction and clarify its official position both domestically and internationally.[20][21] Newspapers reported in November 2016 that Supo was concerned about suspicious land and property transactions made by foreign nationals that could be utilized inhybrid operations, such as to accommodateunmarked military troops.[22][23] A new bill was in process in October 2017 to allow for security authorities to monitor purchases by entities from outside theEuropean Union (EU) buying property nearmilitary installations orbroadcast towers in Finland as well as for the State to reclaim or buy strategically important property.[24] The Service was involved in investigating theTurku stabbing of August 2017, which is considered Finland's first suspectedterrorist attack since the end of World War II.[25][26]
Etsivä keskuspoliisi(EK) Detective Central Police was the Finnish state secret police that operated between 1919 and 1938. It was an early predecessor of today's Supo. The detective central police dedicated itself especially to anti-communist activities. Number of personnel from 1922 to 1927.
The Finnish Security and Intelligence Service states that its core functions arecounter-intelligence,counter-terrorism and othernational security-related work, such as counter-proliferation activities intended to impede the proliferation ofweapons of mass destruction. It is tasked to prevent events that may cause danger to government systems,parliamentary democracy, or internal and external security of theState.[27][28][29][30] Additionally, the Service is the responsible authority for national and international cooperation in the fight against terrorism, for preparing and maintaining terrorist threat assessments, for monitoringextremist phenomena, and for performingsecurity clearances for personnel recruited into sensitive positions. Supo reports to other security authorities and theGovernment of Finland on its activities.[28][31] According to the Police Act, Supo can utilize, among others, traffic data monitoring, covert intelligence gathering, undercover activities, pseudo purchases, and controlled delivery to fulfill its missions.[32]
Supo is a national police unit subordinate to theMinistry of the Interior. It follows aNordic tradition where theintelligence agency is governed as a part of police organisations (i.e. in the form of a security police) instead of being a separate organisation.[5] The Service formerly used the English title Finnish Security Police; the word "police" was amended in 2010 to emphasize the agency's role in security intelligence.[31] In 2019, the Service had 440 employees, of whom 56% were police officers and 40% women, and a total budget of 50.9 millioneuros.[33] In addition to its headquarters inPunavuori, Helsinki, Supo hosts eight regional offices around Finland inTurku,Tampere,Vaasa,Lappeenranta,Joensuu,Kuopio,Oulu andRovaniemi.[34][28] Supo has liaison officers posted atdiplomatic missions inNairobi, Kenya andAnkara, Turkey as well as at theEuropean Union (EU) Intelligence and Situation Centre.[35] The Service is divided into seven different departments as of a 2017 reorganization:[31]
The sourceRatakatu 12: Suojelupoliisi 1949-2009 was "commissioned by Supo, but it was mainly written by professional historians".[36] The book is considered the most definite source and the official history of Supo, but it has been criticized by diplomatAlpo Rusi and reporter Jarko Tirkkonen for not discussing certain parts of the Service's history. On the other hand, politicianErkki Tuomioja praised the book of its high quality.[37] Tirronen and Tuomioja attribute two-thirds of the book to political history professor Kimmo Rentola—who worked for Supo as a historian while writing the book.[12][11] Rentola has written that caution andsource criticism are required when researching histories of security agencies due to the ambiguous and often lacking material.[14]
^Laki suojelupoliisista 17.12.1948/878 ja asetus suojelupoliisista 17.12.1948/879. [Act on the Security Police 17.12.1948/878 and Decree on the Security Police 17.12.1948/879]. (In Finnish).
^abcTuomioja, Erkki (8 September 2009)."Salaisen palvelun tutkimuksen haasteet" [Challenges in secret service research].Tuomioja.org (in Finnish).Archived from the original on 24 October 2017. Retrieved24 October 2017.
^abKimmo, Rentola (2009)."Tiedustelun historian ongelmia" [Problems of intelligence history].Tieteessä Tapahtuu (in Finnish).27 (7):3–6.Archived from the original on 23 October 2017.
de Graaff, Bob; Nyce, James M. (2016).Handbook of European Intelligence Culture. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Duyvesteyn, Isabelle; de Jong, Ben; van Reijn, Joop, eds. (2014).The Future of Intelligence: Challenges in the 21st Century. London and New York: Routledge.
Holmström, Lauri (2013). "Intelligence Culture, Economic Espionage and the Finnish Security Intelligence Service". In Davies, Philip; Gustafson, Kristian (eds.).Intelligence Elsewhere: Spies and Espionage Outside the Anglosphere. Georgetown University Press.