Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Ferdinand I, Holy Roman Emperor

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Holy Roman Emperor from 1556 to 1564
Not to be confused withFerdinand I of Austria.
"Ferdinand I, Archduke of Austria" redirects here. For the later ruler, seeFerdinand I, Emperor of Austria.

Ferdinand I
Imperator Romanorum
Holy Roman Emperor
Reign27 August 1556 –25 July 1564
Proclamation14 March 1558,Frankfurt
PredecessorCharles V
SuccessorMaximilian II
King of the Romans
King in Germany
Reign5 January 1531 –25 July 1564
PredecessorCharles V
SuccessorMaximilian II
King of Hungary,Croatia, andBohemia[a]
Reign1526 –25 July 1564
Coronation3 November 1527 (Hungary)
24 February 1527 (Bohemia)
PredecessorLouis II
SuccessorMaximilian II
Archduke of Austria[b]
Reign21 April 1521 –25 July 1564
PredecessorCharles I
SuccessorMaximilian II (Austria proper)
Charles II (Inner Austria)
Ferdinand II (Further Austria)
Born10 March 1503
Alcalá de Henares,Crown of Castile
Died25 July 1564(1564-07-25) (aged 61)
Vienna,Archduchy of Austria,Holy Roman Empire
Burial
Spouse
Issue
see detail...
HouseHabsburg
FatherPhilip the Handsome
MotherJoanna of Castile
ReligionCatholic Church
SignatureFerdinand I's signature

Ferdinand I (10 March 1503 – 25 July 1564) wasHoly Roman Emperor from 1556,King of Bohemia,Hungary, andCroatia from 1526, andArchduke of Austria from 1521 until his death in 1564.[1][2] Before his accession as emperor, he ruled theAustrian hereditary lands of theHouse of Habsburg in the name of his elder brother,Emperor Charles V, and often served as Charles' representative in developing encouraging relationships with German princes. In addition, Ferdinand also developed valuable relationships with the German banking house ofJakob Fugger and the Catalan bank, Banca Palenzuela Levi Kahana.

The key events during Ferdinand's reign were the conflict with theOttoman Empire, which in the 1520s began a great advance into Central Europe, and the ProtestantReformation, which resulted in several wars of religion. Although not a military leader, Ferdinand was a capable organizer with institutional imagination who focused on building a centralized government for Austria, Hungary, and Bohemia instead of striving for universal monarchy.[3][4] He reintroduced major innovations of his grandfatherMaximilian I such as theHofrat (court council) with a chancellery and a treasury attached to it (this time, the structure would last until the reform ofMaria Theresa) and added innovations of his own such as theRaitkammer (collections office) and theHofkriegsrat, conceived to counter the threat from the Ottoman Empire, while also successfully subduing the most radical of his rebellious Austrian subjects and turning the political class in Bohemia and Hungary into Habsburg partners.[5][6] While he was able to introduce uniform models of administration, the governments of Austria, Bohemia and Hungary remained distinct.[7][8] His approach to Imperial problems, including governance, human relations and religious matters was generally flexible, moderate and tolerant.[9][10][11] Ferdinand's motto wasFiat iustitia, et pereat mundus: "Let justice be done, though the world perish".[12]

Biography

[edit]

Ferdinand was born in 1503 inAlcalá de Henares,Castile, the second son ofPhilip I of Castile andJoanna of Castile. He shared the same name, birthday (March 10th), culture and customs with his maternal grandfather,Ferdinand II of Aragon and became the latter’s favorite grandchild, their own mothers also had the same name,Juana Enriquez and Joanna of Castile. After the death of his father in 1506, his maternal grandfather, Ferdinand II of Aragon, assumed guardianship of the prince. He was raised in the royal household and received an education in literature, the sciences, and languages. Ferdinand was a good student and grew up to be a patron of the arts and a patron of scholars at his court.[13] The prince did not learn German until he was a young adult.

Music played an important part in his childhood. When he was an infant, his maternal grandmother,Isabella I of Castile, ordered that among the 24 servants attending the newborn, there should be four musicians. In 1505, after Isabella's death, King Ferdinand established for the younger Ferdinand a household with 62 servants and his own music chapel.[14]

In the summer of 1518 Ferdinand was sent toFlanders following his brotherCharles's arrival in Castile as newly appointed King Charles I the previous autumn. Ferdinand returned in command of his brother's fleet but en route was blown off-course and spent four days inKinsale inIreland before reaching his destination. With the death of his grandfather Maximilian I and the accession of his now 19-year-old brother, Charles V, to the title of the Holy Roman Emperor in 1519, Ferdinand was entrusted with the government of the Austrian hereditary lands, roughly modern-dayAustria andSlovenia. He wasArchduke of Austria from 1521 to 1564. Though he supported his brother, Ferdinand also managed to strengthen his own realm. By adopting the German language and culture later in his life, he also grew close to the German territorial princes.

After the death of his brother-in-lawLouis II, Ferdinand ruled as king ofBohemia andHungary (1526–1564).[1][15] Ferdinand also served as his brother's deputy in the Holy Roman Empire during his brother's many absences, and in 1531was electedKing of the Romans, making him Charles's designated heir in the empire. Charles abdicated in 1556 and Ferdinand adopted the title "Emperor elect", with the ratification of theImperial diet taking place in 1558,[1][16] while the kingdoms in the Iberian peninsula, theSpanish Empire,Naples,Sicily,Milan, theNetherlands andFranche-Comté went toPhilip, son of Charles.

Hungary and the Ottomans

[edit]
See also:Little War in Hungary
Ferdinand as a young boy

According to the terms set at theFirst Congress of Vienna in 1515, Ferdinand marriedAnne Jagiellonica, daughter of KingVladislaus II of Hungary and Bohemia on 22 July 1515.[17] Both Hungary and Bohemia wereelective monarchies,[18] where the parliaments had the sovereign right to decide about the person of the king. Therefore, after the death of his brother-in-lawLouis II of Hungary and Bohemia, at theBattle of Mohács on 29 August 1526, Ferdinand immediately applied to the parliaments ofHungary andBohemia to participate as a candidate in the royal elections. On 24 October 1526 the Bohemian Diet, acting under the influence of chancellorAdam of Hradce, elected Ferdinand king of Bohemia under conditions of confirming traditional privileges of the estates and also moving the Habsburg court toPrague. The success was only partial, as the Diet refused to recognise Ferdinand as hereditary lord of the kingdom.

The throne of Hungary became the subject of a dynastic dispute between Ferdinand andJohn Zápolya,Voivode of Transylvania. They were supported by different factions of the nobility in the Hungarian kingdom. Ferdinand also had the support of his brother, the EmperorCharles V.

On 10 November 1526, John Zápolya was proclaimed king by a Diet atSzékesfehérvár, elected in the parliament by the untitled lesser nobility (gentry).

Nicolaus Olahus, secretary of Louis, attached himself to the party of Ferdinand but retained his position with his sister, Queen DowagerMary. Ferdinand was also electedKing of Hungary, Dalmatia, Croatia, Slavonia, etc. by the higher aristocracy (the magnates or barons) and the Hungarian Catholic clergy in a rump Diet inPozsony (Bratislava in Slovak) on 17 December 1526.[19] Accordingly, Ferdinand was crowned as King of Hungary in theSzékesfehérvár Basilica on 3 November 1527.

The Croatian nobles unanimously accepted the Pozsony election of Ferdinand I, receiving him as their king in the1527 election in Cetin, and confirming the succession to him and his heirs.[20] In return for the throne, King Ferdinand promised to respect the historic rights, freedoms, laws and customs of the Croats when they united with the Hungarian kingdom and to defend Croatia fromOttoman invasion.[2]

Brendan Simms notes that the reason Ferdinand was able to gain this sphere of power was Charles V's difficulties in coordinating between the Austrian, Hungarian fronts and his Mediterranean fronts in the face of the Ottoman threat, as well as in his German, Burgundian and Italian theatres of war against German Protestant princes and France. Thus the defense of central Europe was subcontracted to Ferdinand as well as many responsibilities involving the management of the empire. Charles V abdicated as archduke of Austria 1522, and nine years after that he had the German princeselect Ferdinand asKing of the Romans, who thus became his designated successor. "This had profound implications for state formation in south-eastern Europe. Ferdinand rescued Bohemia and Silesia from the Hungarian wreckage, making his north-eastern flank more secure. He told the Austrian Landtag, the assembled representatives of the nobility, atLinz in 1530 that 'the Turks cannot be resisted unless the Kingdom of Hungary was in the hands of an Archduke of Austria or another German prince'. After some hesitation,Croatia and the Hungarian rump joined the Habsburgs. In both cases, the link was essentially a contractual one, directly linked to Ferdinand's ability to provide protection against the Turks."[21]

The Austrian lands were in miserable economic and financial conditions, but Ferdinand was forced to introduce the so-called Turk Tax (Türkensteuer) to finance his campaign against the Ottoman threat. In spite of the huge Austrian sacrifices, he was not able to collect enough money to pay for the expenses of the defence costs of Austrian lands. His annual revenues only allowed him to hire 5,000 mercenaries for two months; thus Ferdinand asked for help from his brother, Emperor Charles V, and started to borrow money from rich bankers like theFugger family.[22]

Ferdinanddefeated Zápolya at theBattle of Tarcal in September 1527 and again in theBattle of Szina in March 1528. Zápolya fled the country and applied to SultanSuleiman the Magnificent for support, making Hungary an Ottoman vassal state.

This led to the most dangerous moment of Ferdinand's career, in 1529, when Suleimantook advantage of this Hungarian support for a massive but ultimately unsuccessful assault on Ferdinand's capital: theSiege of Vienna, which sent Ferdinand to refuge in Bohemia. A further Ottoman invasion was repelled in 1532 (seeSiege of Güns). In that year Ferdinandmade peace with the Ottomans, splitting Hungary into a Habsburg sector in the west (Royal Hungary), and John Zápolya's domain in the east (Eastern Hungarian Kingdom), the latter effectively a vassal state of the Ottoman Empire.

Arms of Ferdinand, Infante of Spain and Archduke of Austria, KG, at the time of his installation as a knight of the Most Noble Order of the Garter

Together with the formation of theSchmalkaldic League in 1531, this struggle with the Ottomans caused Ferdinand to grant theNuremberg Religious Peace. As long as he hoped for a favorable response from his humiliating overtures to Suleiman, Ferdinand was not inclined to grant the peace which theProtestants demanded at theDiet of Regensburg which met in April 1532. But as the army of Suleiman drew nearer he yielded and on 23 July 1532 the peace was concluded atNuremberg where the final deliberations took place. Those who had up to this time joined the Reformation obtained religious liberty until the meeting of a council and in a separate compact all proceedings in matters of religion pending before the imperial chamber court were temporarily paused.[23]

In 1538, in theTreaty of Nagyvárad, Ferdinand induced the childless Zápolya to name him as his successor. But in 1540, just before his death, Zápolya had a son,John II Sigismund, who was promptly elected king by the Diet. Ferdinand invaded Hungary, but the regent, FraterGeorge Martinuzzi,Bishop of Várad, called on the Ottomans for protection. Suleiman marched into Hungary (seeSiege of Buda (1541)) and not only drove Ferdinand out of central Hungary, he forced Ferdinand to agree to pay tribute for his lands in western Hungary.[24]

King Ferdinand I of Hungary (Nádasdy Mausoleum, 1664)

John II Sigismund was also supported by the King ofPoland and Grand Duke ofLithuaniaSigismund I of , his mother's father, but in 1543 Sigismund made a treaty with the Habsburgs and Poland became neutral. PrinceSigismund Augustus married ArchduchessElisabeth of Austria, Ferdinand's daughter.

Suleiman had allocated Transylvania and eastern Royal Hungary to John II Sigismund, which became the "Eastern Hungarian Kingdom", reigned over by his mother,Isabella Jagiellon, with Martinuzzi as the real power. But Isabella's hostile intrigues and threats from the Ottomans led Martinuzzi to switch round. In 1549, he agreed to support Ferdinand's claim, and Imperial armies marched into Transylvania. In theTreaty of Weissenburg (1551), Isabella agreed on behalf of John II Sigismund to abdicate as king of Hungary and to hand over theHoly Crown of Hungary and regalia. Thus Royal Hungary and Transylvania went to Ferdinand, who agreed to recognise John II Sigismund as vassal Prince of Transylvania and betrothed one of his daughters to him. Meanwhile, Martinuzzi attempted to keep the Ottomans happy even after they responded by sending troops. Ferdinand's general Castaldo suspected Martinuzzi of treason and with Ferdinand's approval had him killed.

Since Martinuzzi was by this time anarchbishop andCardinal, this was a shocking act, andPope Julius IIIexcommunicated Castaldo and Ferdinand. Ferdinand sent the Pope a long accusation of treason against Martinuzzi in 87 articles, supported by 116 witnesses. The Pope exonerated Ferdinand and lifted the excommunications in 1555.[25]

From 1548 to the end of the war, aHabsburg Spanish infantry tercio that had fought in theSchmalkaldic War was detached in Hungary to fight against John Zápolya's supporters on behalf of Ferdinand.[26] Holy Roman EmperorCharles V sent Spanish troops to help his brother regularly from 1527 to 1553.[27]

OttomanSiege of Eger Castle in 1552

Thewar in Hungary continued. In theOttoman campaign of 1552, two Ottoman armies took the eastern part of central Hungary. Ferdinand was unable to keep the Ottomans out of Hungary. In 1554, Ferdinand sentOgier Ghiselin de Busbecq toConstantinople to discuss a border treaty with Suleiman, but he could achieve nothing. In 1556 the Diet returned John II Sigismund to the eastern Hungarian throne, where he remained until 1570. De Busbecq returned to Constantinople in 1556, and succeeded on his second try.

The Austrian branch of Habsburg monarchs needed the economic power of Hungary for the Ottoman wars. During the Ottoman wars the territory of the formerKingdom of Hungary shrank by around seventy percent. Despite these enormous territorial and demographic losses, the smaller, heavily war-torn Royal Hungary had remained economically more important to the Habsburg rulers than Austria or Kingdom of Bohemia even at the end of the 16th century.[28] Out of all his countries, the depleted Kingdom of Hungary was, at that time, Ferdinand's largest source of revenue.[29]

Consolidation of power in Bohemia

[edit]
Main article:The Estates Revolt in 1547
Ferdinand in 1531, the year of his election asKing of the Romans

When he took control of theBohemian lands in the 1520s, their religious situation was complex. Its German population was composed of Catholics and Lutherans. Some Czechs were receptive to Lutheranism, but most of them adhered toUtraquistHussitism, while a minority of them adhered toRoman Catholicism. A significant number of Utraquists favoured an alliance with the Protestants.[30] At first, Ferdinand accepted this situation and he gave considerable freedom to the Bohemian estates. In the 1540s, the situation changed. In Germany, while most Protestant princes had hitherto favored negotiation with the emperor and while many had supported him in his wars, they became increasingly confrontational during this decade. Some of them even went to war against the emperor, and many Bohemian (German or Czech) Protestants or Utraquists sympathized with them.[30]

Ferdinand and his sonMaximilian participated in thevictorious campaign ofCharles V against the German Protestants in 1547. The same year, he also defeated aProtestant revolt in Bohemia, where the estates and a large part of the nobility had denied him support in the German campaign. This allowed him to increase his power in this realm. He centralized his administration, revoked many urban privileges and confiscated properties.[30] Ferdinand also sought to strengthen the position of the Catholic Church in the Bohemian lands, and favoured the installation of theJesuits there.

Ferdinand and the Augsburg Peace of 1555

[edit]

In the 1550s, Ferdinand managed to win some key victories on the imperial scene. Unlike his brother, he opposedAlbert Alcibiades, Margrave of Brandenburg-Kulmbach and participated in his defeat.[31] This defeat, along with his German ways, made Ferdinand more popular than the emperor among Protestant princes. This allowed him to play a critical role in the settlement of the religious issue in the empire.

After decades of religious and political unrest in the German states, Charles V ordered a generalDiet in Augsburg at which the various states would discuss the religious problem and its solution. Charles himself did not attend, and delegated authority to his brother, Ferdinand, to "act and settle" disputes of territory, religion and local power.[32] At the conference, which opened on 5 February, Ferdinand cajoled, persuaded and threatened the various representatives into agreement on three important principles promulgated on 25 September:

  1. The principle ofcuius regio, eius religio ("Whose realm, his religion") provided for internal religious unity within a state: the religion of the prince became the religion of the state and all its inhabitants. Those inhabitants who could not conform to the prince's religion were allowed to leave, an innovative idea in the sixteenth century. This principle was discussed at length by the various delegates, who finally reached agreement on the specifics of its wording after examining the problem and the proposed solution from every possible angle.
  2. The second principle, called thereservatum ecclesiasticum (ecclesiastical reservation), covered the special status of the ecclesiastical state. If the prelate of an ecclesiastic state changed his religion, the men and women living in that state did not have to do so. Instead, the prelate was expected to resign from his post, although this was not spelled out in the agreement.
  3. The third principle, known asDeclaratio Ferdinandei (Ferdinand's Declaration), exemptedknights and some of thecities from the requirement of religious uniformity, if the reformed religion had been practised there since the mid-1520s, allowing for a few mixed cities and towns where Catholics and Lutherans had lived together. It also protected the authority of the princely families, the knights and some of the cities to determine what religious uniformity meant in their territories. Ferdinand inserted this at the last minute, on his own authority.[33]

Problems with the Augsburg settlement

[edit]
Armor of Ferdinand I, Holy Roman Emperor, created when he was stillKing of the Romans in 1549

After 1555, the Peace of Augsburg became the legitimating legal document governing the co-existence of the Lutheran and Catholic faiths in the German lands of the Holy Roman Empire, and it served to ameliorate many of the tensions between followers of the "Old Faith" (Catholicism) and the followers of Luther, but it had two fundamental flaws. First, Ferdinand had rushed the article onreservatum ecclesiasticum through the debate; it had not undergone the scrutiny and discussion that attended the widespread acceptance and support ofcuius regio, eius religio. Consequently, its wording did not cover all, or even most, potential legal scenarios. TheDeclaratio Ferdinandei was not debated in plenary session at all; using his authority to "act and settle,"[32] Ferdinand had added it at the last minute, responding to lobbying by princely families and knights.[34]

While these specific failings came back to haunt the empire in subsequent decades, perhaps the greatest weakness of the Peace of Augsburg was its failure to take into account the growing diversity of religious expression emerging in the so-called evangelical and reformed traditions. Other confessions had acquired popular, if not legal, legitimacy in the intervening decades and by 1555, the reforms proposed by Luther were no longer the only possibilities of religious expression:Anabaptists, such as the FrisianMenno Simons (1492–1559) and his followers; the followers ofJohn Calvin, who were particularly strong in the southwest and the northwest; and the followers ofHuldrych Zwingli were excluded from considerations and protections under the Peace of Augsburg. According to the Augsburg agreement, their religious beliefs remained heretical.[35]

Charles V's abdication

[edit]

In 1556, amid great pomp, and leaning on the shoulder of one of his favourites (the 24-year-oldWilliam the Silent),[36] Charles gave away his lands and his offices. TheSpanish Empire, which included Spain, theHabsburg Netherlands,Kingdom of Naples,Duchy of Milan and Spain's possessions in theAmericas, went to his son,Philip. Ferdinand becamesuo jure monarch in Austria and succeeded Charles as Holy Roman Emperor.[37] This course of events had been guaranteed already on 5 January 1531 when Ferdinand had been elected theKing of the Romans and so the legitimate successor of the reigning emperor.

Coat of arms of Ferdinand I as King of the Romans, 1536, Hofburg palace, Vienna

Charles's choices were appropriate. Philip was culturally Spanish: he was born inValladolid and raised in the Spanish court, his native tongue was Spanish, and he preferred to live in Spain. Ferdinand was familiar with, and to, the other princes of the Holy Roman Empire. Although he too had been born in Spain, he had administered his brother's affairs in the empire since 1531.[35] Some historians maintain Ferdinand had also been touched by the reformed philosophies, and was probably the closest the Holy Roman Empire ever came to a Protestant emperor; he remained nominally a Catholic throughout his life, although reportedly he refused last rites on his deathbed.[38] Other historians maintain he was as Catholic as his brother, but tended to see religion as outside the political sphere.[39]

Charles' abdication had far-reaching consequences in Imperial diplomatic relations with France and the Netherlands, particularly in his allotment of the Spanish kingdom to Philip. In France, the kings and their ministers grew increasingly uneasy about Habsburg encirclement and sought allies against Habsburg hegemony from among the border German territories, and even from some of the Protestant kings. In the Netherlands, Philip's ascension in Spain raised particular problems; for the sake of harmony, order, and prosperity Charles had not blocked the Reformation, and had tolerated a high level of local autonomy. An ardent Catholic and rigidly autocratic prince, Philip pursued an aggressive political, economic and religious policy toward the Dutch, resulting in aDutch rebellion shortly after he became king. Philip's militant response meant the occupation of much of the upper provinces by troops of, or hired by,Habsburg Spain and the constant ebb and flow of Spanish men and provisions on the so-calledSpanish Road from northern Italy, through theFranche-Comté, to and from Flanders.[40]

Holy Roman Emperor (1556–1564)

[edit]
Posthumous engraving of Ferdinand byMartin Rota, 1575

Charles abdicated as emperor in August 1556 in favor of his brother Ferdinand. Given the settlement of 1521 and the election of 1531, Ferdinand became Holy Roman Emperor andsuo jure Archduke of Austria. Due to lengthy debate and bureaucratic procedure, theImperial Diet did not accept the Imperial succession until 3 May 1558. The Pope refused to recognize Ferdinand as emperor until 1559, whenpeace was reached betweenFrance and the Habsburgs. During his reign, theCouncil of Trent came to an end. Ferdinand organized anImperial election in 1562 in order to secure the succession of his son Maximilian II.Venetian ambassadors to Ferdinand recall in theirRelazioni the emperor's pragmatism and his ability to speak multiple languages. Several issues of the Council of Trent were solved after a compromise was personally reached between Emperor Ferdinand and Morone, thepapal legate.

In the Empire

[edit]

An important invention of Ferdinand was theHofkriegsrat (Aulic War Council), officially established in 1556 to coordinate military affairs in all Habsburg lands (inside and outside the Holy Roman Empire).[41] Together with theReichshofkanzlei [de] (established in 1559, merging the Imperial and Austrian Chancelleries, thus also dealing with affairs of both Imperial and Habsburg lands) and theHofkammer (the Finance Chamber, which received imperial taxes from theReichspfennig meister), it formed the core of the Habsburg government in Vienna. TheReichshofrat was revived to deal with affairs concerning imperial prerogatives. In 1556, an ordinance was issued to ensure Imperial and dynastic affairs were managed separately (by two groups of officials from the same institution) though.[42][43] In his time, the influence of the Estates in these institutions were limited. For eachLändergroup, regiments (or governments) and treasury offices were created.[44]

Unlike Maximilian I and Charles V, Ferdinand I was not a nomadic ruler. In 1533, he moved his residence toVienna and spent most of his time there. After experiencing the Turkish siege of 1529, Ferdinand worked hard to make Vienna an impregnable fortress.[45] After his 1558 accession, Vienna became the imperial capital.[46]

Administration of Royal Hungary, Bohemia and Croatia

[edit]
Ferdinand. 16th-century Czech portrait

Since 1542, Charles V and Ferdinand had been able to collect the Common Penny tax, orTürkenhilfe (Turkish aid), designed to protect the empire against the Ottomans or France. But as Hungary, unlike Bohemia, was not part of the empire, the Imperial aid for Hungary depended on political factors. The obligation was only in effect if Vienna or the empire was threatened.[46][47][48][49]

The western part of Hungary over which Ferdinand had dominion became known as Royal Hungary. As the ruler of Austria, Bohemia and Royal Hungary, Ferdinand adopted a policy of centralisation and, in common with other monarchs of the time, the construction of anabsolute monarchy. In 1527, soon after ascending the throne, he published a constitution for his hereditary domains (Hofstaatsordnung) and established Austrian-style institutions inPressburg for Hungary, inPrague for Bohemia, and inBreslau forSilesia.

Ferdinand was able to introduce more uniform governments for his realms and also strengthen his control over finance in Bohemia, which provided him with half of his revenue. The governments basically remained independent of each other though. An Austrian could make a career in Bohemian administration but usually only after naturalization, except for some royal protégés such as Florian Griespeck, while it was virtually unheard of (in contrast with the future) for a Bohemian to gain advancement in the Austrian government.[50] An elected king himself, he gradually nudged the monarchy towards becoming hereditary, which would finally succeed underFerdinand II, Holy Roman Emperor.[51]

Coat of Arms of Ferdinand I of Austria (1503–1564) as King of Hungary and Bohemia

In 1547 theBohemian Estates rebelled against Ferdinand after he had ordered the Bohemian army to move against the GermanProtestants. After suppressing the revolt, he retaliated by limiting the privileges of Bohemian cities and inserting a new bureaucracy of royal officials to control urban authorities.Ferdinand was a supporter of theCounter-Reformation and helped lead theCatholic response against what he saw as the heretical tide of Protestantism. For example, in 1551 he invited theJesuits to Vienna and in 1556 to Prague. Finally, in 1561 Ferdinand revived theArchdiocese of Prague, which had been previously liquidated due to the success of the Protestants.

After the Ottoman invasion of Hungary the traditional Hungarian coronation citySzékesfehérvár came under Ottoman occupation. Thus, in 1536 the Hungarian Diet decided that a new place for coronation of the king as well as a meeting place for the Diet itself would be set inPressburg. Ferdinand proposed that the Hungarian and Bohemian diets should convene and hold debates together with the Austrian estates, but all parties refused such an innovation.

In Hungary, the monarchy remained elective until 1627 (with Habsburgs' female inheritance rights being acknowledged in 1723), although the kings that followed Ferdinand would always be Habsburgs.[52]

A rudimentary union between Austria, Hungary and Bohemia was formed though, on the basis of common legal status. Ferdinand had an interest in keeping Bohemia separate from imperial jurisdiction and making the connection between Bohemia and the empire looser (Bohemia did not have to pay taxes to the empire). As he gained the rights of an Imperial prince-elector as king of Bohemia, he was able to give Bohemia (as well as associated territories such asUpper andLower Lusatia,Silesia andMoravia) the same privileged status as Austria, therefore affirming his superior position in the empire.[53][54]

Death and succession

[edit]
The graves of Ferdinand I,Anne of Bohemia and Hungary, Maximilian II in theSt. Vitus Cathedral atPrague Castle

In December 1562, Ferdinand had ArchdukeMaximilian, his eldest sonelectedKing of the Romans. This was followed with succession in Bohemia, and in 1563, the crown of Hungary.[55]

Ferdinand died inVienna in 1564 and is buried inSt. Vitus Cathedral in Prague. After his death, Maximilian ascended unchallenged.[56]

Legacy

[edit]
Partition of Habsburg dominions in 1556

Ferdinand's legacy ultimately proved enduring. Though lacking resources, he managed to defend his land against the Ottomans with limited support from his brother, and even secured a part of Hungary that would later provide the basis for the conquest of the whole kingdom by the Habsburgs. In his own possessions, he built a tax system that, though imperfect, would continue to be used by his successors.[57] His handling of the Protestant Reformation proved more flexible and more effective than that of his brother and he played a key part in the settlement of 1555, which started an era of peace in Germany. His statesmanship, overall, was cautious and effective. On the other hand, when he engaged in more audacious endeavours, like his offensives againstBuda andPest, it often ended in failure.

Fichtner remarks that Ferdinand was a mediocre military commander (thus the many difficulties in dealing with the Ottomans in Hungary) but an energetic and very imaginative administrator, who produced a framework for his empire that endured into the eighteenth century. The core included a court council, privy council, central treasury and a body for military affairs, with the written business conducted by a common chancery. In his time and in practice, Bohemia and Hungary resisted cooperating with the structure but the German territories widely imitated it.[58]

Ferdinand was also a patron of the arts. He embellished Vienna and Prague. TheUniversity of Vienna was reorganized. He also called Jesuits to the capital city, attracted architects and scholars from Italy and the Low Countries to create an intellectualmilieu surrounding the court. He promoted scholarly interest in Oriental languages.[59] Thehumanists he invited had a major influence on his son Maximilian. He was particularly fond of music and hunting. While not a gifted commander, he was interested in military matters and participated in several campaigns during his reign.

He was the lastKing of Germany crowned inAachen.[60]

Name in other languages

[edit]

German,Czech,Slovenian,Slovak,Serbian,Croatian:Ferdinand I.;Hungarian:I. Ferdinánd; Spanish:Fernando I;Italian:Ferdinando I;Turkish:1. Ferdinand;Polish:Ferdynand I.

Marriage and children

[edit]

On 26 May 1521 inLinz, Austria, Ferdinand marriedAnna of Bohemia and Hungary (1503–1547), daughter ofVladislaus II of Bohemia and Hungary and his wifeAnne of Foix-Candale.[17] They had fifteen children, all but two of whom reached adulthood:

NameBirthDeathNotes
Elizabeth9 July 152615 June 1545Married to the future King of Poland and Grand Duke of LithuaniaSigismund II Augustus
Maximilian II, Holy Roman Emperor31 July 152712 October 1576Married to his first cousinMaria of Spain and had issue[61]
Anna7 July 152816/17 October 1590Married toAlbert V, Duke of Bavaria[61]
Ferdinand II, Archduke of Austria[61]14 June 152924 January 1595Married toPhilippine Welser and then to his niece (daughter of Eleanor)Anne Juliana Gonzaga
Maria15 May 153111 December 1581Married toWilhelm, Duke of Jülich-Cleves-Berg[61]
Magdalena14 August 153210 September 1590A nun
Catherine15 September 153328 February 1572Married toDuke Francesco III of Mantua[62] and then to King of Poland and Grand Duke of LithuaniaSigismund II Augustus[63]
Eleanor2 November 15345 August 1594Married toWilliam I, Duke of Mantua
Margaret16 February 153612 March 1567A nun
John10 April 153820 March 1539Died in childhood
Barbara30 April 153919 September 1572Married toAlfonso II, Duke of Ferrara and Modena
Charles II, Archduke of Austria[61]3 June 154010 July 1590Father ofFerdinand II, Holy Roman Emperor
Ursula24 July 154130 April 1543Died in childhood
Helena7 January 15435 March 1574A nun
Joanna24 January 154710 April 1578Married toFrancesco I de' Medici, Grand Duke of Tuscany[61]

Heraldry

[edit]
Heraldry of Ferdinand I, Holy Roman Emperor
Coat of arms as Infante of Spain, Archduke of Austria
(1520–1526)
Coat of arms as King of Hungary & Bohemia
(1526–1564)
Coat of arms as King of the Romans
(1531–1564)
Coat of arms as Holy Roman Emperor
(1558–1564)

Ancestors

[edit]
Ancestors of Ferdinand I, Holy Roman Emperor
8.Frederick III, Holy Roman Emperor[66]
4.Maximilian I, Holy Roman Emperor[64]
9.Eleanor of Portugal[66]
2.Philip I of Castile
10.Charles I, Duke of Burgundy[67]
5.Mary, Duchess of Burgundy[64]
11.Isabella of Bourbon[67]
1.Ferdinand I, Holy Roman Emperor
12.John II of Aragon[68]
6.Ferdinand II of Aragon[65]
13.Juana Enriquez[68]
3.Joanna I of Castile
14.John II of Castile[69]
7.Isabella I of Castile[65]
15.Isabella of Portugal[69]

Male-line family tree

[edit]
House of Habsburg[n 1]
 Original line
Albert
Count of Habsburg

c. 1188–1239
Rudolf I
of Germany

c. 1218–1291
Albert I
of Germany

1255–1308
Hartmann
1263–1281
Rudolf II
Duke of Austria

1270–1290
Rudolf I
of Bohemia

1281–1307
Frederick
the Fair

c. 1289–1330
Leopold I
Duke of Austria

1290–1326
Albert II
Duke of Austria

1298–1358
Henry
the Friendly

1299–1327
Otto
Duke of Austria

1301–1339
John
Parricida

c. 1290–1312/1313
 Albertinian line Leopoldian line
Rudolf IV
Duke of Austria

1339–1365
Frederick III
1347–1362
Albert III
Duke of Austria

1349–1395
Leopold III
Duke of Austria

1351–1386
Frederick II
Duke of Austria
1327–1344
Leopold II
Duke of Austria

1328–1344
Albert IV
Duke of Austria

1377–1404
William
Duke of Austria

c. 1370–1406
Leopold IV
Duke of Austria

1371–1411
Ernest
Duke of Austria

1377–1424
Frederick IV
Duke of Austria

1382–1439
Albert II
of Germany

1397–1439
Frederick III
HRE

1415–1493
Albert VI
Archduke of Austria

1418–1463
Sigismund
Archduke of Austria

1427–1496
Ladislaus
the Posthumous

1440–1457
Maximilian I
HRE

1459–1519
Philip I
of Castile

1478–1506
 Spanish /Iberianline Austrian /HRE line
Charles V
HRE

1500–1558
Ferdinand I
HRE

1503–1564
Philip II
of Spain

1527–1598
Maximilian II
HRE

1527–1576
Ferdinand II
Archduke of Austria

1529–1595
Charles II
Archduke of Austria

1540–1590
Carlos
Prince of Asturias

1545–1568
Philip III
of Spain

1578–1621
Rudolf II
HRE

1552–1612
Ernest
of Austria

1553–1595
Matthias
HRE

1557–1619
Maximilian III
Archduke of Austria

1558–1618
Albert VII
Archduke of Austria

1559–1621
Wenceslaus
Archduke of Austria

1561–1578
Andrew
Margrave of Burgau

1558–1600
Charles
Margrave of Burgau

1560–1618
Ferdinand II
HRE

1578–1637
Maximilian Ernest
of Austria

1583–1616
Leopold V
Archduke of Austria

1586–1632
Charles
of Austria

1590–1624
Philip IV
of Spain

1605–1665
Charles
of Austria

1607–1632
Ferdinand
of Austria

1609–1641
John-Charles
of Austria
1605–1619
Ferdinand III
HRE

1608–1657
Leopold Wilhelm
of Austria

1614–1662
Ferdinand Charles
Archduke of Austria

1628–1662
Sigismund Francis
Archduke of Austria

1630–1665
Balthasar Charles
Prince of Asturias

1629–1646
Charles II
of Spain

1661–1700
Ferdinand IV
King of the Romans

1633–1654
Leopold I
HRE

1640–1705
Charles Joseph
of Austria

1649–1664
Joseph I
HRE

1678–1711
Charles VI
HRE

1685–1740
 Lorraine
Maria Theresa
HRE

1740–1780
Francis I
HRE

1745–1765
 Habsburg-Lorraine
Joseph II
HRE

1765–1790
Leopold II
HRE

1790–1792
Francis II
HRE

1792–1806
Notes:
  1. ^"Habsburg family tree".Habsburg family website. 28 October 2023. Retrieved11 September 2001.

Coinage

[edit]
The Renaissance coin

Ferdinand I has been the main motif for many collector coins and medals. The most recent one is the Austrian silver 20-euroRenaissance coin issued on 12 June 2002. A portrait of Ferdinand I is shown on the reverse of the coin, while on the obverse a view of the Swiss Gate of the Hofburg Palace can be seen.

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^Hungary & Croatia contested byJohn I (1526–40) andJohn II Sigismund (1540–51, 1556–64)
  2. ^In the name ofEmperor Charles V until 1556

References

[edit]
  1. ^abc"Ferdinand I | Holy Roman emperor".Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved10 September 2020.
  2. ^abMilan Kruhek: Cetin, grad izbornog sabora Kraljevine Hrvatske 1527, Karlovačka Županija, 1997, Karslovac
  3. ^Pánek, Jaroslav; Tůma, Oldřich (15 April 2019).A History of the Czech Lands. Charles University in Prague, Karolinum Press. p. 214.ISBN 978-80-246-2227-9. Retrieved13 December 2021.
  4. ^Fichtner, Paula Sutter (2017).The Habsburg Monarchy, 1490–1848: Attributes of Empire. Macmillan International Higher Education. p. 18.ISBN 978-1-137-10642-1. Retrieved13 December 2021.[permanent dead link]
  5. ^Berenger, Jean; Simpson, C. A. (2014).A History of the Habsburg Empire 1273–1700. Routledge. p. 263.ISBN 978-1-317-89569-5. Retrieved13 December 2021.
  6. ^Fichtner 2017, pp. 18, 19.
  7. ^Evans, R. J. W. (2006).Austria, Hungary, and the Habsburgs: Central Europe c. 1683–1867. OUP Oxford. p. 82.ISBN 978-0-19-928144-2. Retrieved13 December 2021.
  8. ^Fichtner 2017, p. 19.
  9. ^Thomas, Alfred (2007).A Blessed Shore: England and Bohemia from Chaucer to Shakespeare. Cornell University Press. p. 171.ISBN 978-0-8014-4568-2. Retrieved13 December 2021.
  10. ^Fichtner, Paula S. (1982).Ferdinand I of Austria: The Politics of Dynasticism in the Age of the Reformation. East European Monographs. p. 4.ISBN 978-0-914710-95-0. Retrieved13 December 2021.
  11. ^Ingrao, Charles W. (1994).State and Society in Early Modern Austria. Purdue University Press. p. 31.ISBN 978-1-55753-047-9. Retrieved13 December 2021.
  12. ^Stone, Jon R. (2005).The Routledge Dictionary of Latin Quotations: The Illiterati's Guide to Latin Maxims, Mottoes, Proverbs and Sayings (in Latin). Psychology Press.ISBN 978-0415969093.
  13. ^Potter 2014, p. 331.
  14. ^Ros-Fábregas, E. (2008). “Melodies for Private Devotion at the Court of Queen Isabel”. In B. Weissberger (Ed.),Queen Isabel I of Castile: Power, Patronage, Persona (p. 95). Boydell & Brewer.
  15. ^Ferdinand I, Holy Roman emperor. The Columbia Encyclopedia, Sixth Edition. 2001.
  16. ^"Rapport établi par M. Alet Valero"(PDF). Centre National de Documentation Pédagogique. 2006. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 7 January 2007. Retrieved2 May 2008.
  17. ^abRasmussen 2018, p. 65.
  18. ^Martyn Rady (2014).The Emperor Charles V.Routledge. p. 47.ISBN 978-1317880820.
  19. ^Robert A. Kann (1980).A History of the Habsburg Empire, 1526–1918.University of California Press. p. 611.ISBN 978-0520042063.
  20. ^R. W. Seton-Watson (1911).The southern Slav question and the Habsburg Monarchy. p. 18.
  21. ^Simms, Brendan (30 April 2013).Europe: The Struggle for Supremacy, from 1453 to the Present. Basic Books. p. 1737.ISBN 978-0-465-06595-0. Retrieved30 August 2022.
  22. ^Berenger, Jean; Simpson, C.A. (2014).A History of the Habsburg Empire 1273–1700.Routledge. p. 160.ISBN 978-1317895701.
  23. ^article on the Nuremberg Religious Peace, p. 351 of the 1899 Lutheran Cyclopedia
  24. ^Imber, Colin (2002).The Ottoman Empire, 1300–1650: The Structure of Power. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. p. 53.ISBN 978-0333613863.
  25. ^George Martinuzzi entry in theCatholic Encyclopedia
  26. ^Korpás, Zoltán: La correspondencia de un soldado español de las guerras de Hungría a mediados del siglo XVI. Comentarios al diario de Bernardo de Aldana (1548–1552). In:Hispania, Vol. 60, no 206, 2000, pp. 881–910
  27. ^Dixon, C. Scott; Fuchs, Martina:The histories of Emperor Charles V: nationale Perspektiven von Persönlichkeit und Herrschaft. Münster: Aschendorff, 2005.ISBN 3402065746, p. 235
  28. ^Evans, Robert & Wilson, Peter (2012).The Holy Roman Empire, 1495–1806: A European Perspective Volume 1 van Brill's Companions to European History. Brill. p. 263.ISBN 978-9004206830.
  29. ^Dr. István Kenyeres: The Financial Administrative Reforms and Revenues of Ferdinand I in Hungary, English summary at p- 92 Link1:[1] Link2:[2]
  30. ^abcBetween Lipany and White Mountain, Palmitessa
  31. ^Germany and the Holy Roman Empire, Whaley
  32. ^abHolborn, p. 241.
  33. ^For a general discussion of the impact of the Reformation on the Holy Roman Empire, see Holborn, chapters 6–9 (pp. 123–248).
  34. ^Holborn, pp. 244–245.
  35. ^abHolborn, pp. 243–246.
  36. ^Lisa Jardine,The Awful End of William the Silent: The First Assassination of a Head of State with A Handgun, London, HarperCollins, 2005,ISBN 0007192576, Chapter 1; Richard Bruce Wernham,The New Cambridge Modern History: The Counter Reformation and Price Revolution 1559–1610, (vol. 3), 1979, pp. 338–345.
  37. ^Holborn, pp. 249–250; Wernham, pp. 338–345.
  38. ^See ParkerEmperor: A new life of Charles V, 2019, pp. 20–50.
  39. ^Holborn, pp. 250–251.
  40. ^Parker, p. 35.
  41. ^Mugnai, Bruno; Flaherty, Chris (2016).Der lange Türkenkrieg, the long turkish war (1593–1606), vol. 2. Soldiershop Publishing. p. 36.ISBN 978-88-9327-162-2. Retrieved21 September 2022.
  42. ^Munck, Bert De; Romano, Antonella (2019).Knowledge and the Early Modern City: A History of Entanglements. Routledge. p. 361.ISBN 978-0-429-80843-2. Retrieved21 September 2022.
  43. ^Wilson, Peter H. (2016).The Holy Roman Empire: A Thousand Years of Europe's History. Penguin Books Limited. p. 214.ISBN 978-0-14-195691-6. Retrieved21 September 2022.
  44. ^Cassese, Sabino; Bogdandy, Armin von; Huber, Peter (2017).The Max Planck Handbooks in European Public Law: Volume I: The Administrative State. Oxford University Press. p. 128.ISBN 978-0-19-103982-9. Retrieved21 September 2022.
  45. ^Duindam, Jeroen; Duindam, Jeroen Frans Jozef; Duindam, Professor Jeroen; Roper, Lecturer in History Royal Holloway and Bedford New College Lyndal (2003).Vienna and Versailles: The Courts of Europe's Dynastic Rivals, 1550–1780. Cambridge University Press. p. 145.ISBN 978-0-521-82262-6. Retrieved17 January 2022.
  46. ^abÁgoston, Gábor (2021).The Last Muslim Conquest: The Ottoman Empire and Its Wars in Europe. Princeton University Press. p. 312.ISBN 978-0-691-20538-0. Retrieved17 January 2022.
  47. ^Zmora, Hillay (2002).Monarchy, Aristocracy and State in Europe 1300–1800. Routledge. p. 50.ISBN 978-1-134-74798-6. Retrieved17 January 2022.
  48. ^Ninness, Richard J. (2020).German Imperial Knights: Noble Misfits between Princely Authority and the Crown, 1479–1648. Routledge. p. 106.ISBN 978-1-000-28502-4. Retrieved17 January 2022.
  49. ^Tracy, James D. (2016).Balkan Wars: Habsburg Croatia, Ottoman Bosnia, and Venetian Dalmatia, 1499–1617. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 163.ISBN 978-1-4422-1360-9. Retrieved17 January 2022.
  50. ^Evans 2006, p. 82.
  51. ^Fichtner, Paula Sutter (2009).Historical Dictionary of Austria. Scarecrow Press. p. 98.ISBN 978-0-8108-6310-1. Retrieved30 August 2022.
  52. ^Szente, Zoltán (2021).Constitutional Law in Hungary. Kluwer Law International B.V. p. 20.ISBN 978-94-035-3304-9. Retrieved30 August 2022.
  53. ^Whaley, Joachim (2011).Germany and the Holy Roman Empire: Volume I: Maximilian I to the Peace of Westphalia, 1493–1648. OUP Oxford. p. 370.ISBN 978-0-19-154752-2. Retrieved30 August 2022.
  54. ^Evans, Robert; Wilson, Peter (2012).The Holy Roman Empire, 1495–1806: A European Perspective. Brill. p. 126.ISBN 978-90-04-20683-0. Retrieved30 August 2022.
  55. ^Potter, Philip J. (10 January 2014).Monarchs of the Renaissance: The Lives and Reigns of 42 European Kings and Queens. McFarland.ISBN 978-0-7864-9103-2. Retrieved30 August 2022.
  56. ^Potter 2014, p. 340.
  57. ^History of the Habsburg empire, Jean Bérenger
  58. ^Fichtner 2009, p. 98.
  59. ^Munck & Romano 2019, p. 361.
  60. ^Pavlac, Brian A.; Lott, Elizabeth S. (1 June 2019).The Holy Roman Empire: A Historical Encyclopedia [2 volumes]. ABC-CLIO. p. 232.ISBN 978-1-4408-4856-8. Retrieved30 August 2022.
  61. ^abcdefWard, Prothero & Leathes 1934, p. table 32.
  62. ^Hickson 2016, p. 101.
  63. ^Davies 1982, p. 137.
  64. ^abWurzbach, Constantin von, ed. (1861)."Habsburg, Philipp I. der Schöne von Oesterreich" .Biographisches Lexikon des Kaiserthums Oesterreich [Biographical Encyclopedia of the Austrian Empire] (in German). Vol. 7. p. 112 – viaWikisource.
  65. ^abChisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911)."Joanna" .Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 15 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press.
  66. ^abHolland, Arthur William (1911)."Maximilian I. (emperor)" . InChisholm, Hugh (ed.).Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 17 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press.
  67. ^abPoupardin, René (1911)."Charles, called The Bold, duke of Burgundy" . InChisholm, Hugh (ed.).Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 5 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press.
  68. ^abChisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911)."Ferdinand V. of Castile and Leon and II. of Aragon" .Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 10 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press.
  69. ^abChisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911)."Isabella of Castile" .Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 14 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Sources

[edit]
  • Davies, Norman (1982).God's Playground: A History of Poland. Columbia University Press.
  • Hickson, Sally Anne (2016).Women, Art and Architectural Patronage in Renaissance Mantua: Matrons, Mystics, and Monasteries. Routledge.
  • Rasmussen, Mikael Bogh (2018). "Vienna, a Habsburg capital redocorated in classical style: the entry of Maximilian II as King of the Romans in 1563". In Mulryne, J.R.; De Jonge, Krista; Martens, Pieter; Morris, R.L.M. (eds.).Architectures of Festival in Early Modern Europe: Fashioning and Re-fashioning Urban and Courtly Space. Routledge.
  • Ward, A.W.; Prothero, G.W.; Leathes, Stanley, eds. (1934).The Cambridge Modern History. Vol. XIII. Cambridge at the University Press.

Further reading

[edit]
  • Fichtner, Paula S.Ferdinand I of Austria: The Politics of Dynasticism in the Age of the Reformation. Boulder, CO: East European Monographs, 1982,ISBN 0914710958,OCLC 8476035.

External links

[edit]
Wikimedia Commons has media related toFerdinand I, Holy Roman Emperor.
EnglishWikisource has original text related to this article:
Ferdinand I, Holy Roman Emperor
Born: 10 March 1503 Died: 25 July 1564
Regnal titles
Preceded byArchduke of Austria
1521–1564
Succeeded byas Archduke of Austria proper
Succeeded byas Archduke of Inner Austria
Succeeded byas Archduke of Further Austria
King in Germany
1531–1564
Succeeded by
Holy Roman Emperor
1558–1564
Preceded byKing of Hungary andCroatia
1526–1564
With:John I andJohn II Sigismund as contenders
King of Bohemia
1526–1564
Přemyslid
Legendary
c. 870–1198 (Dukes)
1198–1306 (Kings)
Coat of arms of the Kingdom of Bohemia
Non-dynastic
1306–1310
Luxembourg
1310–1437
Habsburg
1437–1457
Non-dynastic
1457–1471
Jagiellonian
1471–1526
Habsburg
1526–1780
Habsburg-Lorraine
1780–1918
East Francia during the
Carolingian dynasty (843–911)
East Francia (911–919)
Kingdom of Germany (919–962)
Kingdom of Germany within the
Holy Roman Empire (962–1806)
Confederation of the Rhine (1806–1813)
German Confederation (1815–1848)
German Empire (1848/1849)
German Confederation (1850–1866)
North German Confederation (1867–1871)
German Empire (1871–1918)
House of Árpád
Grand Princes
Kings
Coat of arms of Hungary
House of Přemysl
House of Wittelsbach
Capetian House of Anjou
House of Luxembourg
House of Habsburg
House of Jagiellon
House of Hunyadi
House of Jagiellon
House of Zápolya
House of Habsburg
House of Habsburg-Lorraine
Debatable or disputed rulers are initalics.
House of Babenberg
Interregnum
House of Habsburg
Austria
House of Habsburg
Styria, Carinthia, Carniola
House of Habsburg
Tyrol
Generations are numbered by male-line descent from the first archdukes. Later generations are included although Austrian titles of nobility were abolished in 1919.
1st generation
2nd generation
3rd generation
4th generation
5th generation
6th generation
7th generation
8th generation
9th generation
11th generation
12th generation
13th generation
14th generation
15th generation
16th generation
Habsburg
Tuscany
Palatines
of Hungary
17th generation
Descent of
Charles I
Tuscany
Palatines
18th generation
Charles
19th generation
Charles
  • S:also an infante of Spain
  • P:also an infante of Portugal
  • T:also a prince of Tuscany
  • M:also a prince of Modena
  • B:also a prince of Belgium
1st generation
2nd generation
4th generation
5th generation
6th generation
7th generation
8th generation
9th generation
10th generation
11th generation
12th generation
13th generation
14th generation
15th generation
16th generation
17th generation
  • 1also a prince of Majorca
  • 2also a prince of Sicily
International
National
Academics
Artists
People
Other
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ferdinand_I,_Holy_Roman_Emperor&oldid=1318626276"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp