This articlerelies largely or entirely on asingle source. Relevant discussion may be found on thetalk page. Please helpimprove this article byintroducing citations to additional sources. Find sources: "Fallacies of illicit transference" – news ·newspapers ·books ·scholar ·JSTOR(May 2023)

Afallacy of illicit transference is aninformal fallacy occurring when an argument assumes there is no difference between a term in thedistributive (referring to every member of a class) andcollective (referring to the class itself as a whole) sense.^[1]

There are two variations of this fallacy:^[1]

• Fallacy of composition – assumes what is true of the parts is true of the whole. This fallacy is also known as "arguing from the specific to the general."

Since Judy is so diligent in the workplace, this entire company must have an amazing work ethic.

• Fallacy of division – assumes what is true of the whole is true of its parts (or some subset of parts). In statistics, forms of it are usually referred to as theecological fallacy.

Because this company is so corrupt, so must every employee within it be corrupt.

While fallacious, arguments that make these assumptions may be persuasive because of therepresentativeness heuristic.

• Affirming the consequent
• Existential fallacy
• Fallacy of the undistributed middle
• Ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny

Thislogic-related article is astub. You can help Wikipedia byexpanding it.

• v
• t
• e

• Informal fallacies
• Logic stubs

• Articles with short description
• Short description is different from Wikidata
• Articles needing additional references from May 2023
• All articles needing additional references
• All stub articles