The rocket consists of a center core on which twoFalcon 9 boosters are attached, and a second stage on top of the center core.[6] Falcon Heavy has the second highest payload capacity of any currently operational launch vehicle behindNASA'sSpace Launch System (SLS), and the fourth-highest capacity of any rocket to reach orbit, trailing behind theSLS,Energia and theSaturn V.
SpaceX conductedFalcon Heavy's maiden launch on February 6, 2018, at 20:45UTC.[7] As adummy payload, the rocket carrieda Tesla Roadster belonging to SpaceX founderElon Musk, with a mannequin dubbed "Starman" in the driver's seat.[8] The second Falcon Heavy launch occurred on April 11, 2019, and all three booster rockets successfully returned toEarth.[9] The third Falcon Heavy launch successfully occurred on June 25, 2019. Since then, Falcon Heavy has been certified for theNational Security Space Launch (NSSL) program.[10]
Falcon Heavy was designed to be able to carry humans into space beyondlow Earth orbit (LEO), although as of February 2018[update], SpaceX does not intend to transport people on Falcon Heavy, nor pursue thehuman-rating certification process to transport NASAastronauts.[11] Both Falcon Heavy and Falcon 9 are expected to eventually be superseded by theStarship super-heavy lift launch vehicle, currently being developed.[12]
Concepts for a Falcon Heavy launch vehicle using threeFalcon 1 core boosters, with an approximate payload-to-LEO capacity of two tons,[13] were initially discussed as early as 2003.[14] The concept for three core booster stages of the company's then as-yet-unflownFalcon 9 was referred to in 2005 as theFalcon 9 Heavy.[15]
SpaceX unveiled the plan for the Falcon Heavy to the public at aWashington, D.C., news conference in April 2011, with an initial test flight expected in 2013.[16]
A number of factors delayed the planned maiden flight to 2018, including two anomalies with Falcon 9 launch vehicles, which required all engineering resources to be dedicated to failure analysis, halting flight operations for many months. The integration and structural challenges of combining three Falcon 9 cores were more difficult than expected.[17]
In July 2017, Elon Musk said, "It actually ended up being way harder to do Falcon Heavy than we thought. ... We were pretty naive about that".[18]
The initial test flight for the first Falcon Heavy lifted off on February 6, 2018, at 20:45 UTC, carrying its dummy payload,Elon Musk's personal Tesla Roadster, beyond Mars orbit.[7]
Musk first mentioned Falcon Heavy in a September 2005 news update, referring to a customer request from 18 months prior.[19] Various solutions using the plannedFalcon 5 (which was never flown) had been explored, but the only cost-effective, reliable iteration was one that used a 9-engine first stage—the Falcon 9. The Falcon Heavy was developed usingprivatecapital with Musk stating that the cost was more than US$500 million. No government financing was provided for its development.[20]
The Falcon Heavy design is based onFalcon 9's fuselage and engines. By 2008, SpaceX had been aiming for the first launch of Falcon 9 in 2009, while "Falcon 9 Heavy would be in a couple of years". Speaking at the 2008Mars Society Conference, Musk also indicated that he expected a hydrogen-fueled upper stage would follow two to three years later (which would have been around 2013).[21]
By April 2011, the capabilities and performance of the Falcon 9 vehicle were better understood, SpaceX having completed two successful demonstration missions tolow Earth orbit (LEO), one of which includedreignition of the second-stage engine. At a press conference at theNational Press Club in Washington, D.C., on April 5, 2011, Musk stated that Falcon Heavy would "carry more payload to orbit orescape velocity than any vehicle in history, apart from theSaturn V Moon rocket ... and SovietEnergia rocket".[22] In the same year, with the expected increase in demand for both variants, SpaceX announced plans to expand manufacturing capacity "as we build towards the capability of producing a Falcon 9 first stage or Falcon Heavy side booster every week and an upper stage every two weeks".[22]
In 2015, SpaceX announced a number of changes to the Falcon Heavy rocket, worked in parallel to theupgrade of the Falcon 9 v1.1 launch vehicle.[23] In December 2016, SpaceX released a photo showing the Falcon Heavy interstage at the company headquarters inHawthorne, California.[24]
By May 2013, a new, partly underground test stand was being built at theSpaceX Rocket Development and Test Facility inMcGregor, Texas, specifically to test the triple cores and twenty-seven rocket engines of the Falcon Heavy.[25] By May 2017, SpaceX conducted the first static fire test of flight-design Falcon Heavy center core at the McGregor facility.[26][27]
In July 2017, Musk discussed publicly the challenges of testing a complex launch vehicle like the three-core Falcon Heavy, indicating that a large extent of the new design "is really impossible to test on the ground" and could not be effectively tested independent of actualflight tests.[18]
By September 2017, all three first stage cores had completed their static fire tests on the ground test stand.[28] The first Falcon Heavy static fire test was conducted on January 24, 2018.[29]
Due partly to the failure ofSpaceX CRS-7 in June 2015, SpaceX rescheduled the maiden Falcon Heavy flight in September 2015 to occur no earlier than April 2016.[32] The flight was to be launched from the refurbishedKennedy Space Center Launch Complex 39A.[33][34] The flight was postponed again to late 2016, early 2017,[35] summer 2017,[36] late 2017[37] and finally to February 2018.[38]
At a July 2017 meeting of the International Space Station Research and Development meeting inWashington, D.C., Musk downplayed expectations for the success of the maiden flight:
There's a real good chance the vehicle won't make it to orbit ... I hope it makes it far enough away from the pad that it does not cause pad damage. I would consider even that a win, to be honest.[18]
In December 2017, Musk tweeted that the dummy payload on the maiden Falcon Heavy launch would behis personal Tesla Roadster playingDavid Bowie's "Space Oddity" (though the song actually used for the launch was "Life on Mars"), and that it would be launched into anorbit around the Sun that will reach the orbit ofMars.[39][40] He released pictures in the following days.[41] The car had three cameras attached to provide "epic views".[8]
On December 28, 2017, the Falcon Heavy was moved to the launch pad in preparation of a static fire test of all 27 engines, which was expected on January 19, 2018.[42] However, due to theU.S. government partial shutdown that began on January 20, 2018, the testing and launch were further delayed.[43] The static fire test was conducted on January 24, 2018.[29][44] Musk confirmed viaTwitter that the test "was good" and later announced the rocket would be launched on February 6, 2018.[45]
On February 6, 2018, after a delay of over two hours due to high winds,[46] Falcon Heavy lifted off at 20:45 UTC.[7] Its side boosters landed safely onLanding Zones 1 and 2 a few minutes later.[47] However, only one of the three engines on the center booster that were intended to restart ignited during descent, causing the booster to be destroyed upon impacting the ocean at a speed of over 480 km/h (300 mph).[48][49]
Initially, Elon Musk tweeted that the Roadster had overshot its plannedheliocentric orbit, and would reach theasteroid belt. Later, observations by telescopes showed that the Roadster would only slightly exceed the orbit of Mars ataphelion.[50]
Falcon Heavy built toFalcon 9 Block 5 specifications on the launch pad in June 2019
A year after the successful demo flight, SpaceX had signed five commercial contracts worth US$500–750 million, meaning that it had managed to cover the development cost of the rocket.[51] The second flight, and first commercial one, occurred on April 11, 2019,[52] launchingArabsat-6A, with all three boosters landing successfully for the first time.
The third flight occurred on June 25, 2019, launching theSTP-2 (U.S. Department of Defense Space Test Program) payload.[52] The payload was composed of 25 small spacecraft.[53] OperationalGeostationary transfer orbit (GTO) missions forIntelsat andInmarsat, which were planned for late 2017, were moved to theFalcon 9 Full Thrust rocket version as it had become powerful enough to lift those heavy payloads in its expendable configuration.[54][55] In June 2022, theU.S. Space Force certified Falcon Heavy for launching its top secret satellites, with the first such launch being USSF-44 which happened at November 1, 2022;[56] and the second of which being USSF-67,[57] which was launched 11 weeks after USSF-44.ViaSat selected the Falcon Heavy in late 2018 for the launch of itsViaSat-3 satellite which was scheduled to launch in the 2020–2022 timeframe;[58] however it would not launch until May 1, 2023.[59] On October 13, 2023, Falcon Heavy embarked on its 8th flight carrying NASA'sPsyche probe to the asteroid16 Psyche. This mission only had the side boosters return to Earth with the center core expended, a decision made to create more tolerable margins for the mission.
Following the announcement of NASA'sArtemis program of returning humans to the Moon, the Falcon Heavy rocket has been mentioned several times as an alternative to the expensiveSpace Launch System (SLS) program, but NASA decided to exclusively use SLS to launch theOrion capsule.[60][61] However, Falcon Heavy will support commercial missions for the Artemis program,[62] since it will be used to transport theDragon XL spacecraft to theLunar Gateway. It was also selected to launch the first two elements of the Lunar Gateway, thePower and Propulsion Element (PPE), and theHabitation and Logistics Outpost (HALO), on a single launch no earlier than 2025,[63] and to launchAstrobotic Technology's Griffin lander as part of the Artemis Program'sCommercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) initiative. On October 14, 2024, Falcon Heavy transported NASA'sEuropa Clipper into space to explore Jupiter's moonEuropa.[64]
Falcon Heavy consists of a structurally strengthened Falcon 9 as the "core" component, with two additionalFalcon 9 first stages with aerodynamic nose-cones mounted outboard serving asstrap-on boosters,[6] conceptually similar to theDelta IV Heavy launcher and proposals for theAtlas V Heavy and RussianAngara A5V. This triple first stage carries a standard Falcon 9 second stage, which in turn carries the payload in a fairing. Falcon Heavy has the second highest lift capability of any operational rocket, with a payload of 63,800 kg (140,700 lb) to low Earth orbit, 26,700 kg (58,900 lb) toGeostationary Transfer Orbit, and 16,800 kg (37,000 lb) totrans-Mars injection.[65] The rocket was designed to meet or exceed all current requirements of human rating. The structural safety margins are 40% above flight loads, higher than the 25% margins of other rockets.[66] Falcon Heavy was designed from the outset to carry humans into space and it would restore the possibility of flying crewed missions to the Moon or Mars.[3]
The Merlin 1D engine
The first stage is powered by three Falcon 9 derived cores, each equipped with nineMerlin 1D engines. The Falcon Heavy has a total sea-level thrust at liftoff of 22.82 MN (5,130,000 lbf), from the 27 Merlin 1D engines, while thrust rises to 24.68 MN (5,550,000 lbf) as the craft climbs out of the atmosphere.[3] The upper stage is powered by a single Merlin 1D engine modified for vacuum operation, with a thrust of 934 kN (210,000 lbf), an expansion ratio of 117:1 and a nominal burn time of 397 seconds. At launch, the center core throttles to full power for a few seconds for additional thrust, then throttles down. This allows a longer burn time. After the side boosters separate, the center core throttles back up to maximum thrust. For added reliability of restart, the engine has dual redundantpyrophoric igniters (Triethylaluminium-Triethylborane) (TEA-TEB).[6] The interstage, which connects the upper and lower stage for Falcon 9, is a carbon fiberaluminum core composite structure. Stage separation occurs via reusable separationcollets and a pneumatic pusher system. The Falcon 9 tank walls and domes are made fromAluminum–lithium alloy. SpaceX uses an all-friction stir welded tank. The second stage tank of Falcon 9 is simply a shorter version of the first stage tank and uses most of the same tooling, material, and manufacturing techniques. This approach reduces manufacturing costs during vehicle production.[6]
All three cores of the Falcon Heavy arrange the engines in a structural form SpaceX callsOctaweb, aimed at streamlining the manufacturing process,[67] and each core includes four extensible landing legs.[68] To control the descent of the boosters and center core through the atmosphere, SpaceX uses four retractablegrid fins at the top of each of the three Falcon 9 boosters, which extend after separation.[69] Immediately after the side boosters separate, three engines in each continue to burn for a few seconds in order to control the booster's trajectory safely away from the rocket.[68][70] The grid fins then deploy as the boosters turn back toEarth, followed by the extending of the landing legs. The side boosters land softly on the ground in fully/partially reusable launch configuration. The center core continues to fire until stage separation. In fully reusable launches, its grid fins and legs deploy and the center core touches down on a drone ship. If boosters are to be expended, then the landing legs and grid fins are omitted from the vehicle. The landing legs are made of carbon fiber with an aluminumhoneycomb structure. The four legs stow along the sides of each core during liftoff and extend outward and down just before landing.[71]
The Falcon Heavy uses a 4.5 m (15 ft)interstage attached to the first stage core.[72] It is acomposite structure consisting of analuminumhoneycomb core surrounded bycarbon fiber face sheet plies. Unlike for Falcon 9, the black thermal protection layer on the interstage of Block 5 center core boosters is later painted white, as seen in the Falcon Heavy flights so far, probably due to aesthetics of the Falcon Heavy Logo, providing it a greyish color.[73] The overall length of the vehicle at launch is 70 m (230 ft), and the total fueled mass is 1,420 t (3,130,000 lb). Without recovery of any stage, the Falcon Heavy can theoretically inject a 63.8 t (141,000 lb) payload into a low Earth orbit, or 16.8 t (37,000 lb) toVenus orMars.[72] However, because of the structural limitations, the maximum weight Falcon Heavy can lift is reduced.[74]
The Falcon Heavy includes first-stagerecovery systems, to allow SpaceX toreturn the first stage boosters to the launch site as well as recover the first stage core following landing at anAutonomous Spaceport Drone Ship barge after completion of primary mission requirements. These systems include four deployablelanding legs, which are locked against each first-stage tank core during ascent and deploy just prior to touchdown. Excess propellant reserved for Falcon Heavy first-stage recovery operations will be diverted for use on the primary mission objective, if required, ensuring sufficient performance margins for successful missions. The nominal payload capacity to ageostationary transfer orbit (GTO) is 8 t (18,000 lb) with recovery of all three first-stage cores (the price per launch is US$97 million), versus 26.7 t (59,000 lb) in fully expendable mode. The Falcon Heavy can also inject a 16 t (35,000 lb) payload into GTO if only the two side boosters are recovered.[72]
Twenty-seven Merlin engines firing during launch ofArabsat-6A in 2019
The partially reusable Falcon Heavy falls into theheavy-lift range of launch systems, capable of lifting 20–50 t (44,000–110,000 lb) into low Earth orbit (LEO), under the classification system used by a NASA human spaceflight review panel.[75] A fully expendable Falcon Heavy is in thesuper heavy-lift category with a maximum payload of 64 t (141,000 lb) to LEO.
The initial concept (Falcon 9-S9 2005) envisioned payloads of 24.75 t (54,600 lb) to LEO, but by April 2011 this was projected to be up to 53 t (117,000 lb)[76] withgeostationary transfer orbit (GTO) payloads up to 12 t (26,000 lb).[77] Later reports in 2011 projected higher payloads beyond LEO, including 19 t (42,000 lb) to GTO,[78] 16 t (35,000 lb) totranslunar trajectory, and 14 t (31,000 lb) on a trans-Martian orbit toMars.[79][80]
By late 2013, SpaceX raised the projected GTO payload for Falcon Heavy to 21.2 t (47,000 lb).[81]
Long exposure of a night launch, June 25, 2019
In April 2017, the projected LEO payload for Falcon Heavy was raised from 54.4 to 63.8 t (120,000 to 141,000 lb). The maximum payload is achieved when the rocket flies a fullyexpendable launch profile, not recovering any of the three first-stage boosters.[1] With just the core booster expended, and two side-boosters recovered, Musk estimates the payload penalty to be around 10%, which would still yield over 57 t (126,000 lb) of lift capability to LEO.[82] Returning all three boosters to the launch site rather than landing them on drone ships would yield about 30 t of payload to LEO.[83]
From 2013 to 2016, SpaceX conducted parallel development of a reusable rocket architecture forFalcon 9, that applies to parts of Falcon Heavy as well. Early on, SpaceX had expressed hopes that all rocket stages would eventually bereusable.[84] SpaceX has since demonstrated routine land and sea recovery of theFalcon 9 first stage, and have successfully recovered multiplepayload fairings.[85][86] In the case of Falcon Heavy, the two outer cores separate from the rocket earlier in the flight, and are thus moving at a lower velocity than in a Falcon 9 launch profile.[71] For the first flight of Falcon Heavy, SpaceX had considered attempting to recover the second stage,[87] but did not execute this plan.
Falcon Heavy payload performance togeosynchronous transfer orbit (GTO) is reduced by the reusable technology, but at a much lower price. When recovering all three booster cores, GTO payload is 8 t (18,000 lb).[1] If only the two outside cores are recovered while the center core is expended, GTO payload would be approximately 16 t (35,000 lb).[72] As a comparison, the next-heaviest contemporary rocket until April 2024, the fully expendable Delta IV Heavy, could deliver 14.2 t (31,000 lb) to GTO.[88]
Falcon Heavy was originally designed with a "propellant crossfeed" capability, whereby the center core engines would be supplied with fuel and oxidizer from the two side cores until theirseparation.[89] This approach had previously been proposed byVladimir Chelomei for theUR-700 launch system. Operating all engines at full thrust from launch, with fuel supplied mainly from the side boosters, would deplete the side boosters sooner, allowing their earlier separation to reduce the mass being accelerated. This would leave most of the center core propellant available after booster separation.[90]
Musk stated in 2016 that crossfeed would not be implemented.[91] Instead, the center booster throttles down shortly after liftoff to conserve fuel, and resumes full thrust after the side boosters have separated.[3]
At an appearance in May 2004 before theUnited States Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, Musk testified, "Long term plans call for development of a heavy lift product and even a super-heavy, if there is customer demand. We expect that each size increase would result in a meaningful decrease in cost per pound to orbit. ... Ultimately, I believe US$500 per pound or less is very achievable".[92] This $1,100/kg ($500/lb) goal stated by Musk in 2011 is 35% of the cost of the lowest-cost-per-poundLEO-capable launch system in a 2001 study: theZenit, a medium-lift launch vehicle that could carry 14 t (31,000 lb) into LEO for US$35–50 million.[93] In 2011, SpaceX stated that the cost of reachinglow Earth orbit could be as low as $2,200/kg ($1,000/lb) if an annual rate of four launches can be sustained, and as of 2011 planned to eventually launch as many as 10 Falcon Heavies and 10 Falcon 9s annually.[79]
The published prices for Falcon Heavy launches have changed as development progressed, with announced prices for the various versions of Falcon Heavy priced at US$80–125 million in 2011,[76] US$83–128 million in 2012,[77] US$77–135 million in 2013,[94] US$85 million for up to 6.4 t (14,000 lb) toGTO in 2014, US$90 million for up to 8 t (18,000 lb) to GTO in 2016.[95]
From 2017 to early 2022, the price has been stated at US$150 million for 63.8 t (141,000 lb) to LEO or 26.7 t (59,000 lb) to GTO (fully expendable).[96] This equates to a price of US$2,350 per kg to LEO and US$5,620 per kg to GTO. In 2022, the published price for a reusable launch was $97 million.[97] In 2022 NASA contracted with SpaceX to launch theNancy Grace Roman Space Telescope on a Falcon Heavy for approximately $255 million, including launch service and other mission related costs.[98]
The nearest competing U.S. rocket wasUnited Launch Alliance'sDelta IV Heavy with a LEO payload capacity of 28.4 t (63,000 lb) costs US$12,340 per kg to LEO and US$24,630 per kg to GTO.[99] The Delta IV Heavy was retired in 2024.
Due to improvements to the performance ofFalcon 9, some of the heavier satellites flown to GTO, such asIntelsat 35e[100] andInmarsat-5 F4,[101] were launched before the debut of Falcon Heavy. SpaceX anticipated the first commercial Falcon Heavy launch would be three to six months after a successful maiden flight,[102][103] but due to delays, the first commercial payload,Arabsat-6A was successfully launched on April 11, 2019, a year and two months after the first flight. SpaceX hoped to have 10 launches every year from 2021 on,[104] but there were no launches in 2020 or 2021.
First demonstration flight launched a Tesla Roadster to atrans-Mars injection heliocentric orbit.[107][108] Both side boosters returned to the launch site and made simultaneous landings; the center core failed to fully relight on landing and crashed into the water adjacent to the droneship, resulting in damage to the vessel's thrusters.[49]
Heavy communications satellite purchased by the Arab League.[113] All three boosters landed successfully[114] but the center core subsequently fell over and was lost during transport due to heavy seas.[115] The two side-boosters were reused on theSTP-2 launch.[116][117]
First classified flight of Falcon Heavy. The contract was awarded to SpaceX for a price of under 30% of that of a typical Delta IV Heavy launch (US$440 million). Payload included two separate satellites and at least three additional rideshare payloads (includingTETRA-1)[134] and weighed roughly 3.7 t (8,200 lb) at launch.[135] They were launched in a direct geosynchronous orbit, necessitating for the first time a planned partially expendable launch, that is, to deliberately expend the center core which was configured without grid fins and landing gear needed for a landing,[136] while the two side-boosterslanded at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station.[137] It was originally scheduled for Q1 2022, but it was delayed due to payload issues to November 1, 2022.[138] Second stage featured a mission extension kit with a gray band painted on theRP-1 kerosene fuel tank, which absorbs sunlight and keeps the propellant from freezing.[139]
Second classified flight of Falcon Heavy, using a new center core in an expendable configuration (no grid fins or landing gear), while the two boosters were reused[142] side-boosters thatlanded at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station. The second stage had a gray band for thermal purposes as the mission requirements were similar to the USSF-44 mission.[143]
Falcon Heavy was originally slated to launch the Viasat-2 satellite, but due to delays anAriane 5launch vehicle was used.[149] Viasat maintained the launch option and delivered its nextKa-band satellite aboard the Falcon Heavy – this one intended to provide service to theAmericas region. Astranis' microGEO satellite Arcturus was manifested in late September 2021. Following a series of MVac engine burns and long periods of coasting, the upper stage of Falcon Heavy deployed the satellite into a near-geosynchronous orbit at approximately T+4:32:27.[150][151] The upper stage went on to successfully deploy the additional payloads, G-Space 1 and Arcturus. Featured a thermal gray band second stage, due to performance requirements for a direct GEO injection, both the center core and side boosters were expended (thus configured without landing legs or grid fins). This was also the first fully expendable mission for Falcon Heavy since its introduction with the fairings being recovered with heavy burn marks.
Heaviest commercial geostationary satellite weighing 9,200 kg (20,300 lb) at launch. The second stage had a gray band for the same reason as on the USSF-44 flight, but this time it was configured for medium coast phase.[153] Core expended, two boosters recovered to land. Payload fairing recovery attempted.
Falcon Heavy launched the 2.6 t (5,700 lb) Psyche orbiter mission into a heliocentric orbit. From there, thePsyche spacecraft will visit thePsycheasteroid in themain asteroid belt.[155] Core expended, two boosters recovered to land. No gray band on second stage as the flight plan did not include long coast phases.
Third classified flight of Falcon Heavy, awarded in June 2018. This mission was the fourth flight of the secondX-37B vehicle and the seventh overall flight in theX-37B program, as well as the first X-37B flight to ahighly ellipticalhigh Earth orbit.[160][161][162] It was intended to include NASA'sSeeds-2 experiment investigating the effects of space-based radiation on plant seeds during a long-duration spaceflight. The center core expended and the two boosters were recovered to land.[163]
In September 2021, NASA awarded SpaceX a launch services contract for the geostationaryGOES-19 weather satellite (known as GOES-U during launch).[165] All three Falcon 9 boosters were new. Both side boosters landed atCape Canaveral Landing Zones and the center core was expended. The second stage had a gray band for thermal purposes due to the mission requirements of a long coast phase between second stage ignitions.
Europa Clipper is to conduct a detailed survey ofEuropa and use a sophisticated suite of science instruments to investigate whether the icy moon has conditions suitable for life. Key mission objectives are to produce high-resolution images of Europa's surface, determine its composition, look for signs of recent or ongoing geological activity, measure the thickness of the moon's icy shell, search for subsurface lakes, and determine the depth and salinity of Europa's ocean. The mission makes flybys of Mars and Earth before arriving at Jupiter in April 2030. The Falcon Heavy for this mission was fully expendable as both the side boosters and core were expended (and configured without landing legs and grid fins). This was the second fully expendable Falcon Heavy mission after Viasat-3 in May 2023.[168][169]
Astrobotic's Griffin Mission One is a lunar lander contracted by NASA as part of the Commercial Lunar Payloads Services program. The lander, the company's second afterPeregrine Mission One, is expected to land in a region of interest in the Moon's south polar region with scientific payloads attached.
In March 2020, NASA announced its first contract for theGateway Logistics Services that guarantees at least two launches on a newDragon XL resupply spacecraft on top of a Falcon Heavy. The spacecraft will carry cargo to Lunar orbit on a six- to twelve-month-long mission.[184][185][186][187][188] Four launches are to ressuplyArtemis IV,Artemis V, Artemis VI, and Artemis VII missions respectively.
This was the first commercial agreement of a Falcon Heavy, and was signed in May 2012.[189] In 2018, the contract option was still maintained but no definitive payload had been chosen.[190]
In May 2012, SpaceX announced thatIntelsat had signed the first commercial contract for a Falcon Heavy flight. It was not confirmed at the time when the first Intelsat launch would occur, but the agreement had SpaceX delivering satellites togeosynchronous transfer orbit (GTO).[191][192] In August 2016, it emerged that this Intelsat contract had been reassigned to aFalcon 9 Full Thrust mission to deliverIntelsat 35e into orbit in the third quarter of 2017.[54] Performance improvements of theFalcon 9 vehicle family since the 2012 announcement, advertising 8.3 t (18,000 lb) to GTO for its expendable flight profile,[193] enabled the launch of this 6 t satellite without upgrading to a Falcon Heavy variant.
In 2014,Inmarsat booked three launches with Falcon Heavy,[194] but due to delays, switched a payload toAriane 5 for 2017.[195] Similarly to theIntelsat 35e case, another satellite from this contract,Inmarsat 5-F4, was switched to a Falcon 9 Full Thrust due to the increased liftoff capacity.[55] The remaining contract covered the launch ofInmarsat-6 F1 in 2020 on aFalcon 9.[196]
In April 2015, SpaceX sent the U.S. Air Force an updated letter of intent outlining a certification process for its Falcon Heavy rocket to launch national security satellites. The process included three successful flights of the Falcon Heavy including two consecutive successful flights, and the letter stated that Falcon Heavy can be ready to fly national security payloads by 2017.[200] But in July 2017, SpaceX announced that the first test flight would take place in December 2017, pushing the second launch (Space Test Program 2) to June 2018.[53] In May 2018, on the occasion of the first launch of the Falcon 9Block 5 variant, a further delay to October 2018 was announced, and the launch was eventually pushed to June 25, 2019.[52] The STP-2 mission used three Block 5 cores.[201]
SpaceX was awarded 40% of the launches in Phase 2 of theNational Security Space Launch (NSSL) contracts, which includes several launches, a vertical integration facility, and development of a larger fairing, from 2024 to 2027.[202]
The payload for theSTP-2 mission of the Department of Defense included 25 small spacecraft from the U.S. military, NASA, and research institutions:[53]
Another secondary payload is the miniaturizedDeep Space Atomic Clock that is expected to facilitate autonomous navigation.[204] The U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory's Demonstration and Science Experiments (DSX) has a mass of 500 kg (1,100 lb) and will measure the effects of very low frequency radio waves on space radiation.[53] The British 'Orbital Test Bed' payload is hosting several commercial and military experiments.
The Block 5-second stage allowed multiple reignitions to place its many payloads in multiple orbits. The launch was planned to include a 5 t (11,000 lb) ballast mass,[205] but the ballast mass was later omitted from the 3.7 t (8,200 lb) total mass for the payload stack.[206]
In 2011, NASAAmes Research Center proposed aMars mission calledRed Dragon that would use a Falcon Heavy as the launch vehicle and trans-Martian injection vehicle, and a variant of theDragon capsule toenter theMartian atmosphere. The proposed science objectives were to detectbiosignatures and to drill approximately 1 m (3.3 ft) underground, in an effort to sample reservoirs ofwater ice known to exist under the surface. The mission cost as of 2011[update] was projected to be less than US$425 million, not including the launch cost.[207] SpaceX 2015 estimation was 2,000–4,000 kg (4,400–8,800 lb) to the surface of Mars, with a softretropropulsive landing following a limited atmospheric deceleration using a parachute andheat shield.[208] Beyond theRed Dragon concept, SpaceX was seeing potential for Falcon Heavy and Dragon 2 to carry science payloads across much of theSolar System, particularly toJupiter's moonEuropa.[208] However, SpaceX announced in 2017 that propulsive landing for Dragon 2 would not be developed further, and that the capsule would not receive landing legs. Consequently, theRed Dragon missions to Mars were canceled in favor ofStarship, a larger vehicle using a different landing technology.[209]
Falcon Heavy is the launch vehicle for the initial modules of theLunar Gateway:Power and Propulsion Element (PPE) andHabitation and Logistics Outpost (HALO).[210] To decrease complexity,[211] NASA announced in February 2021 that it will launch the first two elements on a single Falcon Heavy launch vehicle, targeting a launch date no earlier than 2025.[63][182] Before switching to a merged launch, NASA listed in April 2020 Falcon Heavy as the launch vehicle for PPE lone launch.[212]
In March 2020, Falcon Heavy won the first award to a resupply mission to the Lunar Gateway, placing a newDragon XL spacecraft on a translunar injection orbit.[185]
NASA chose Falcon Heavy as the launch vehicle for itsPsyche mission to a metallic asteroid; it launched on October 13, 2023.[213] The contract was worth US$117 million.[214][215][216]
Europa Clipper was initially targeted to be launched on an SLS rocket. However, due to extensive delays, in 2021 NASA awarded the launch contract to SpaceX for a fully expendable Falcon Heavy.[217] It launched on October 14, 2024.[218]
Dragonfly, a rotorcraft mission to Saturn's moonTitan, is scheduled to launch on a Falcon Heavy in July 2028.[219]
^abcMusk, Elon (July 19, 2017).Elon Musk, ISS R&D Conference (video). ISS R&D Conference, Washington D.C., U.S. Event occurs at 36:00–39:50.Archived from the original on November 13, 2021. RetrievedFebruary 5, 2018 – via YouTube.There is a lot of risk associated with the Falcon Heavy. There is a real good chance that the vehicle does not make it to orbit ... I hope it makes far enough away from the pad that it does not cause pad damage. I would consider even that a win, to be honest. ... I think Falcon Heavy is going to be a great vehicle. There is just so much that is really impossible to test on the ground. We'll do our best. ... It actually ended up being way harder to do Falcon Heavy than we thought. At first it sounds real easy; you just stick two first stages on as strap-on boosters. How hard can that be? But then everything changes. [the loads change, aerodynamics totally change, tripled vibration and acoustics, you break the qualification levels on all the hardware, redesign the center core airframe, separation systems] ... Really way, way more difficult than we originally thought. We were pretty naive about that. ... but optimized, its 2 1/2 times the payload capability of Falcon 9.
^ One or more of the preceding sentences incorporates text from this source, which is in thepublic domain:Nield, George C. (April 2014).Draft Environmental Impact Statement: SpaceX Texas Launch Site(PDF) (Report). Vol. 1. Federal Aviation Administration, Office of Commercial Space Transportation. pp. 2–3. Archived fromthe original on December 7, 2013.
^abcdefghij"Fiche Technique: Falcon Heavy" [Technical data sheet: Falcon Heavy].Espace & Exploration (in French). No. 51. June 2019. pp. 62–63.Archived from the original on June 16, 2019. RetrievedJune 16, 2019.
^Musk, Elon (September 29, 2017).Becoming a Multiplanet Species (video). Adelaide Australia: SpaceX.Archived from the original on November 13, 2021. RetrievedDecember 17, 2018 – via YouTube.
^Strickland, John K. Jr. (September 2011)."The SpaceX Falcon Heavy Booster". National Space Society.Archived from the original on January 17, 2013. RetrievedNovember 24, 2012.
^ One or more of the preceding sentences incorporates text from this source, which is in thepublic domain:"Tesla Roadster (AKA: Starman, 2018-017A)".ssd.jpl.nasa.gov. NASA. March 1, 2018.Archived from the original on December 22, 2018. RetrievedMarch 15, 2018.
^Clark, Stephen."After a three-year wait, SpaceX's Falcon Heavy could launch again later this month".Spaceflight Now.Archived from the original on October 5, 2022. RetrievedOctober 5, 2022.The core stage was expended on the USSF-44, while the rocket's two side boosters returned to near-simultaneous landings in SpaceX's recovery zone at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station. A military spokesperson said in 2021 that the Falcon Heavy's two side boosters on the USSF-44 mission would target landing on two SpaceX drone ships floating downrange in the Atlantic Ocean.
^Clark, Stephen (May 23, 2022)."Launch of NASA's Psyche asteroid mission delayed to late September".Spaceflight Now.Archived from the original on July 2, 2022. RetrievedSeptember 3, 2022.One of those missions, USSF 44, had been tentatively scheduled for late June, but has been postponed indefinitely.... All of the delays to the upcoming Falcon Heavy missions have been caused by payload issues.
^Clark, Stephen."Falcon Heavy rocket on the launch pad for one of SpaceX's most complex missions – Spaceflight Now".Archived from the original on January 1, 2023. RetrievedNovember 1, 2022.The next military mission to fly on a Falcon Heavy rocket, named USSF-67, will launch the LDPE 3 spacecraft and a Space Force communications satellite in tandem. That launch is scheduled for January, and will use the same Falcon Heavy side boosters flown on the USSF-44 mission, assuming a successful recovery on the landing zones at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station, the Space Force said.
^"Contracts For Aug. 20, 2021".defense.gov. August 20, 2021.Archived from the original on July 20, 2022. RetrievedJuly 20, 2022.Space Exploration Technologies Corp., Hawthorne, California, has been awarded a $19,226,072 bilateral modification (P00009) to previously awarded Space Force 52 contract FA8811-18-C-0003... ...the total cumulative face value of the contract is $149,226,072.
^ One or more of the preceding sentences incorporates text from this source, which is in thepublic domain:"Deep Space Atomic Clock".Jet Propulsion Laboratory. NASA. April 27, 2015.Archived from the original on December 10, 2015. RetrievedOctober 28, 2015.
^ One or more of the preceding sentences incorporates text from this source, which is in thepublic domain:"Assessments of Major Projects"(PDF).gao.gov. GAO. 2020.Archived(PDF) from the original on May 1, 2020. RetrievedOctober 24, 2020.
This template lists historical, current, and future space rockets that at least once attempted (but not necessarily succeeded in) an orbital launch or that are planned to attempt such a launch in the future
Symbol† indicates past or current rockets that attempted orbital launches but never succeeded (never did or has yet to perform a successful orbital launch)
_(cropped).jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
