Provinces of the Ottoman Empire in Europe, Asia, and Africa in 1692, divided into beylerbeyliks, protectorates and tributary states. By Guillaume Sanson (1633–1703).
From1453 to the beginning of the nineteenth century the Ottoman local government was loosely structured.[2] The empire was at first divided into states called eyalets, presided over by abeylerbey (title equivalent toduke inTurkish andAmir al Umara inArabic) of three tails (feathers borne on a state officer's ceremonial staff).[2] Thegrand vizier was responsible for nominating all the high officers of state, both in the capital and the states.[2] Between 1861 and 1866, these eyalets were abolished, and the territory was divided for administrative purposes intovilayets (provinces).[2]
The eyalets were subdivided into districts calledlivas or sanjaks,[3] each of which was under the charge of a pasha of one tail, with the title of mira-lira, orsanjak-bey.[4] These provinces were usually called pashaliks by Europeans.[4] The pasha was invested with powers of absolute government within his province, being the chief of both the military and financial departments, as well as police and criminal justice.[4]
The 1803Cedid Atlas, showing the Middle Eastern eyalets
At official functions, the order of precedence wasEgypt,Baghdad,Abyssinia,Buda,Anatolia, "Mera'ish", and theKapudan Pasha in Asia and Buda, Egypt, Abyssinia, Baghdad, andRumelia in Europe, with the remainder arranged according to the chronological order of their conquest.[5]
Two European maps of the Ottoman Empire. The first map describes the provinces as "beylerbeyliks", whereas the second describes them as "pashaliks"
The termeyalet is sometimes translatedprovince orgovernorate. Depending on the rank of the governor, they were also sometimes known aspashaliks (governed by apasha),beylerbeyliks (governed by abey orbeylerbey), andkapudanliks (governed by akapudan).
Pashaluk orPashalik (Turkish:paşalık) is the abstract word derived frompasha, denoting the quality, office or jurisdiction of apasha or the territory administered by him. In European sources, the word "pashalic" generally referred to the eyalets.[4]
The term 'eyalet' began to be applied to the largest administrative unit of the Ottoman Empire instead of beglerbegilik from the 1590s onward, and it continued to be used until 1867.[6]
Murad I instituted the great division of the sultanate into two beylerbeyiliks ofRumelia andAnatolia, in circa 1365.[7] With the eastward expansion of Bayezid's realms in the 1390s, a third eyalet,Rûm Eyalet, came into existence, withAmasya its chief town. This became the seat of government of Bayezid's youngest son,Mehmed I, and was to remain a residence of princely governors until the 16th century.[8]
In 1395, Bayezid I executed the lastShishmanid Tsar ofBulgaria, and annexed his realm toRumelia Eyalet. In 1461, Mehmed II expelled the last of theIsfendyarid dynasty fromSinop, awarding him lands thus taxation authority nearBursa in exchange for his hereditary territory. The Isfendyarid principality became a district ofAnatolia Eyalet.[8] In 1468,Karaman Eyalet was established, following the annexation of the formerly independentprincipality of Karaman;Mehmed II appointed his sonMustafa as governor of the new eyalet, with his seat atKonya.[8]
The 16th century saw the greatest increase in the number of eyalets, largely through the conquests ofSelim I andSüleyman I, which created the need to incorporate the new territory into the structure of the Empire, and partly through the reorganisation of existing territory.[8] A list dated 1527 shows eight eyalets, withEgypt,Damascus,Diyarbekir andKurdistan added to the original four. The last eyalet, however, did not survive as an administrative entity. Süleyman's conquests in eastern Turkey, Iraq and Hungary also resulted in the creation of new eyalets.[8]
In 1580, Bosnia, previously a district of Rumelia, became an eyalet in its own right, presumably in view of its strategically important position on the border with the Habsburgs. Similar considerations led to the creation of theKanije Eyalet from the districts adjoining this border fortress, which had fallen to the Ottomans in 1600. In the same period, the annexation of the Rumelian districts on the lower Danube and the Black Sea coast, and their addition to territories between the Danube and theDniepr along the Black Sea, created theSilistra Eyalet. At the same time, on the south-eastern shore of the Black Sea,Trebizond Eyalet came into being. The purpose of this reorganisation, and especially the creation of the eyalet of Özi was presumably to improve the defences of the Black Sea ports against the Cossacks.[8]
Eyalets in 1609
By 1609, according to the list ofAyn Ali, there were 32 eyalets. Some of these, such as Tripoli, Cyprus or Tunis, were the spoils of conquest. Others, however, were the products of administrative division.[8]
The beylerbeyliks where thetimar system was not applied, such asAbyssinia, Algiers, Egypt, Baghdad, Basra andLahsa, were more autonomous than the others. Instead of collecting provincial revenues throughsipahis, the beylerbey transferred fixed annual sums to Constantinople, known as thesalyane.[6]
By 1500, the four central eyalets of the Empire, Rumelia, Anatolia, Rum and Karaman, were under direct rule.Wallachia,Moldavia and theKhanate of the Crimea, territories which Mehmed II had brought under his suzerainty, remained in the control of native dynasties tributary to the Sultan. So, too, did the Kingdom of Hungary after thebattle of Mohács in 1526.[8]
also called Sukhum [Sohumkale] or Georgia [Gürcistan] and includedMingrelia andImeretia as well as modern Abkhazia – nominally annexed but never fully conquered
Conquests ofSelim I andSuleyman I in the 16th century required an increase in administrative units. By the end of the latter half of the century there were as many as 42eyalets, as the beylerbeyliks came to be known. The chart below shows the administrative situation as of 1609.
Also calledMeskheti, later possibly coextensive with Akhaltsikhe (Ahıska) Province. Most of eyalet passed to Russia in 1829. Remained parts of eyalet bounded to Erzurum in 1845.
Turkish Language Association defines the wordeyalet as "an administrative division having some kind of administrative independence" and in modern Turkish, the wordeyalet is used widely in the context offederalism, corresponding to the English wordstate. While the wordeyalet is out of use in Turkishpublic administration, replaced long ago byils under a unitary structure, top-level administrative subdivisions of numerousfederal states are called"eyalet" in Turkish, such as the states ofAustralia,Austria,Brazil,Germany,India,Malaysia,Mexico andthe United States, sometimes along with the provinces ofArgentina,Canada andPakistan, deferent to the modern definition of the word. AlbeitChina andIran are legally unitary states, these countries' provinces may also occasionally be referred to aseyalet in Turkish.