
Inmathematics, theextended real number system[a] is obtained from thereal number system by adding two elements denoted and[b] that are respectively greater and lower than every real number. This allows for treating thepotential infinities of infinitely increasing sequences and infinitely decreasing series asactual infinities. For example, theinfinite sequence of thenatural numbers increasesinfinitively and has noupper bound in the real number system (a potential infinity); in the extended real number line, the sequence has as itsleast upper bound and as itslimit (an actual infinity). Incalculus andmathematical analysis, the use of and as actual limits extends significantly the possible computations.[1] It is theDedekind–MacNeille completion of the real numbers.
The extended real number system is denoted,, or.[2] When the meaning is clear from context, the symbol is often written simply as.[2]
There is also a distinctprojectively extended real line where and are not distinguished, i.e., there is a single actual infinity for both infinitely increasing sequences and infinitely decreasing sequences that is denoted as just or as.
The extended number line is often useful to describe the behavior of afunction when either theargument or the function value gets "infinitely large" in some sense. For example, consider the function defined by
Thegraph of this function has a horizontalasymptote at. Geometrically, when moving increasingly farther to the right along the-axis, the value ofapproaches 0. This limiting behavior is similar to thelimit of a function in which thereal number approaches except that there is no real number that approaches when increases infinitely. Adjoining the elements and to enables a definition of "limits at infinity" which is very similar to the usual definition of limits, except that is replaced by (for) or (for). This allows proving and writing
This sectionmay beconfusing or unclear to readers. In particular, darn the original message I can understand this page just fine. Please helpclarify the section. There might be a discussion about this onthe talk page.(July 2025) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
Inmeasure theory, it is often useful to allow sets that have infinitemeasure and integrals whose value may be infinite.
Such measures arise naturally out of calculus. For example, in assigning a measure to that agrees with the usual length ofintervals, this measure must be larger than any finite real number. Also, when consideringimproper integrals, such as
the value "infinity" arises. Finally, it is often useful to consider the limit of a sequence of functions, such as
Without allowing functions to take on infinite values, such essential results as themonotone convergence theorem and thedominated convergence theorem would not make sense.
The extended real number system, defined as or, can be turned into atotally ordered set by defining for all. With thisorder topology, has the desirable property ofcompactness: Everysubset of has asupremum and aninfimum[2] (the infimum of theempty set is, and its supremum is). Moreover, with thistopology, ishomeomorphic to theunit interval. Thus the topology ismetrizable, corresponding (for a given homeomorphism) to the ordinarymetric on this interval. There is no metric, however, that is an extension of the ordinary metric on.
In this topology, a set is aneighborhood of if and only if it contains a set for some real number. The notion of the neighborhood of can be defined similarly. Using this characterization of extended-real neighborhoods,limits with tending to or, and limits "equal" to and, reduce to the general topological definition of limits—instead of having a special definition in the real number system.
The arithmetic operations of can be partially extended to as follows:[3]
For exponentiation, seeExponentiation § Limits of powers. Here, means both and, while means both and.
The expressions,, and (calledindeterminate forms) are usually leftundefined. These rules are modeled on the laws forinfinite limits. However, in the context ofprobability or measure theory, is often defined as 0.[4]
When dealing with both positive and negative extended real numbers, the expression is usually left undefined, because, although it is true that for every real nonzero sequence thatconverges to 0, thereciprocal sequence is eventually contained in every neighborhood of, it isnot true that the sequence must itself converge to either or Said another way, if acontinuous function achieves a zero at a certain value then it need not be the case that tends to either or in the limit as tends to. This is the case for the limits of theidentity function when tends to 0, and of (for the latter function, neither nor is a limit of, even if only positive values of are considered).
However, in contexts where only non-negative values are considered, it is often convenient to define. For example, when working withpower series, theradius of convergence of a power series withcoefficients is often defined as the reciprocal of thelimit-supremum of the sequence. Thus, if one allows to take the value, then one can use this formula regardless of whether the limit-supremum is 0 or not.
With the arithmetic operations defined above, is not even asemigroup, let alone agroup, aring or afield as in the case of. However, it has several convenient properties:
In general, all laws of arithmetic are valid in as long as all occurring expressions are defined.
Several functions can becontinuouslyextended to by taking limits. For instance, one may define the extremal points of the following functions as:
Somesingularities may additionally be removed. For example, the function can be continuously extended to (undersome definitions of continuity), by setting the value to for, and 0 for and. On the other hand, the function cannot be continuously extended, because the function approaches as approaches 0from below, and as approaches 0 from above, i.e., the function not converging to the same value as its independent variable approaching to the same domain element from both the positive and negative value sides.
A similar but different real-line system, theprojectively extended real line, does not distinguish between and (i.e. infinity is unsigned).[4] As a result, a function may have limit on the projectively extended real line, while in the extended real number system only theabsolute value of the function has a limit, e.g. in the case of the function at. On the other hand, on the projectively extended real line, and correspond to only a limit from the right and one from the left, respectively, with the full limit only existing when the two are equal. Thus, the functions and cannot be made continuous at on the projectively extended real line.