Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Evolution of mammalian auditory ossicles

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Middle ear bones evolved from jaw bones
Part of a series on
Paleontology

Theevolution of mammalian auditory ossicles was anevolutionary process that resulted in the formation of themammalianmiddle ear, where the three middle ear bones orossicles, namely theincus,malleus andstapes (a.k.a. "the anvil, hammer, and stirrup"), are a defining characteristic of mammals. The event is well-documented[1] and important[2][3] academically as a demonstration oftransitional forms andexaptation, the re-purposing of existing structures during evolution.[4]

The ossicles evolved from skull bones present in mosttetrapods, includingamphibians,sauropsids (which includeextantreptiles andbirds) and earlysynapsids (which include ancestors of mammals). The reptilianquadrate,articular andcolumella bones arehomologs of the mammalian incus, malleus and stapes, respectively. In reptiles (and early synapsids by association), theeardrum is connected to theinner ear via a single bone, the columella, while the upper and lower jaws contain several bones not found in modern mammals. Over the course ofmammalian evolution, one bone from the upper jaw (the quadrate) and one from the lower jaw (the articular) lost their function in the jaw articulation and migrated to form the middle ear. The shortened columella connected to these bones to form akinematic chain of three ossicles, which serve toamplify air-sourced fine vibrations transmitted from the eardrum and facilitate more acutehearing in terrestrial environments.

History

[edit]

Following on the ideas ofÉtienne Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire (1818), and studies byJohann Friedrich Meckel the Younger (1820),Carl Gustav Carus (1818),Martin Rathke (1825), andKarl Ernst von Baer (1828),[5] the relationship between the reptilian jaw bones and mammalian middle-ear bones was first established on the basis ofembryology andcomparative anatomy byKarl Bogislaus Reichert in 1837.[6] These ideas were advanced byErnst Gaupp,[7] and are now known as theReichert–Gaupp theory.[8][9] Reichert mainly studied the embryological development of the secondpharyngeal arch (as inReichert's cartilage).[5] Despite publishing decades before the publication ofOn the Origin of Species in 1859, Reichert theorized that part of the reptilian jaw bones and two of the mammalian ossicles are homologous in some sense.[10]: 160 

The discovery of the link inhomology between the reptilian jaw joint and mammalian malleus and incus is considered an important milestone in the history of comparative anatomy.[11] Work on extincttheromorphs byOwen (1845), and continued bySeeley,Broom, and Watson, was pivotal in discovering the intermediate steps to this change.[12] The transition between the "reptilian" jaw and the "mammalian" middle ear was not bridged in thefossil record until the 1950s[13] with the elaboration of such fossils as the now-famousMorganucodon.[14]

During embryonic development, the incus and malleus arise from the samefirst pharyngeal arch as themandible andmaxilla, and are served by mandibular and maxillary division of thetrigeminal nerve.[15] Recent genetic studies are able to relate the development of the ossicles from the embryonic arch[16] to hypothesized evolutionary history.[17]Bapx1, also known asNkx3.2 (a member of the NK2 class ofhomeobox genes),[18] is implicated in the change from the jaw bones of non-mammals to the ossicles of mammals.[19][20] Other implicated genes include theDlx genes,Prx genes, andWnt genes.[21]

A typical mammalian middle ear: sound makes the tympanum (eardrum) vibrate; 3 small bones, the malleus, incus and stapes, transmit the vibrations to the labyrinth (inner ear), which transforms the vibrations into nerve signals.

Defining characteristic of mammals

[edit]

Living mammal species can be identified by the presence in females ofmammary glands which produce milk. Other features are required when classifyingfossils, since mammary glands and other soft-tissue features are not visible in fossils.Paleontologists therefore use the ossicles as distinguishing bony features shared by all living mammals (includingmonotremes), but not present in any of the earlyTriassictherapsids ("mammal-like reptiles").

Upper and lower portions of a python skull, displaying multiple bony components of the upper and lower jaws. Courtesy of the Peabody Museum of Natural History; Division of Vertebrate Zoology; Yale University.

Early amniotes had a jaw joint composed of thearticular (a small bone at the back of the lower jaw) and thequadrate (a small bone at the back of the upper jaw). All non-mammalian amniotes use this system includinglizards,crocodilians,dinosaurs (and their descendants thebirds) andtherapsids; so the onlyossicle in theirmiddle ears is thestapes. The mammalian jaw joint is composed of different skull bones, including thedentary (the lower jaw bone which carries the teeth) and thesquamosal (another small skull bone). In mammals, the quadrate and articular bones have evolved into theincus andmalleus bones in the middle ear.[22][23]

The mammalianmiddle ear contains three tiny bones known as theossicles:malleus,incus, andstapes. The ossicles are a complex system oflevers whose functions include: reducing theamplitude of the vibrations; increasing the mechanicalforce of vibrations; and thus improving the efficient transmission of sound energy from the eardrum to theinner ear structures. The ossicles act as the mechanical analog of an electricaltransformer, matching themechanical impedance of vibrations in air to vibrations in the liquid of thecochlea. The net effect of thisimpedance matching is to greatly increase the overall sensitivity and upper frequency limits of mammalian hearing, as compared to reptilian hearing. The details of these structures and their effects vary noticeably between different mammal species, even when the species are as closely related as humans andchimpanzees.[24]

Phylogeny

[edit]

The following simplifiedcladogram displays relationships betweentetrapods:

Tetrapods

The first fully terrestrialvertebrates wereamniotes, which developed in eggs with internal membranes which allowed the developingembryo to breathe but kept water in. The first amniotes arose in the lateCarboniferous from the ancestralreptiliomorphs (a group of amphibians whose only living descendants are amniotes). Within a few million years two important amniote lineages became distinct: thesynapsid ancestors of mammals, and thesauropsids ancestors oflizards,snakes,crocodilians,dinosaurs andbirds.[25]

The evolution of mammalian jaw joints and ears did not occur simultaneously with the evolution of other mammalian features. In other words, jaw joints and ears do not define any except the most recent groups of mammals.

Mammalian and non-mammalian jaws. In the mammal configuration, thequadrate andarticular bones are much smaller and form part of the middle ear. Note that in mammals the lower jaw consists of only thedentary bone.[26]

Early tetrapod and amniote ears

[edit]

In modern amniotes (including mammals), the middle ear collects airborne sounds through aneardrum and transmits vibrations to the inner ear via thin cartilaginous and ossified structures. These structures usually include thestapes (astirrup-shaped auditory ossicle).

Earlytetrapods likely did not possess eardrums. Eardrums appear to have evolved independently three to six times.[27][28] In basal members of the 3 majorclades of amniotes (synapsids,eureptiles, andparareptiles) thestapes bones are relatively massive props that support thebraincase, and this function prevents them from being used as part of the hearing system. However, there is increasing evidence that synapsids, eureptiles and parareptiles developed eardrums connected to the inner ear by stapes during thePermian.[29]

Early therapsid jaws and ears

[edit]

The jaws of early synapsids, including the ancestors of mammals, were similar to those of othertetrapods of the time, with a lower jaw consisting of atooth-bearing dentary bone and several smaller posterior bones. The jaw joint consisted of thearticular bone in the lower jaw and thequadrate in the upper jaw. The earlypelycosaurs (late Carboniferous andearly Permian) likely did not havetympanic membranes (external eardrums). Additionally, their massive stapes bones supported the braincase, with the lower ends resting on the quadrates. Their descendants, thetherapsids (including mammalian ancestors), probably had tympanic membranes in contact with the quadrate bones. The stapes remained in contact with the quadrate bone, but functioned as auditory ossicles rather than supports for the brain case. As a result, the quadrate bones of therapsids likely had a dual function in both the jaw joint and auditory system.[30][31]

Twin-jointed jaws

[edit]
Morganucodontidae and other transitional forms had both types of jaw joint:dentary-squamosal (front) andarticular-quadrate (rear).

During thePermian and earlyTriassic the dentary of therapsids, including the ancestors of mammals, continually enlarged while other jaw bones were reduced.[32]

Eventually, the dentary bone evolved to make contact with thesquamosal, a bone in the upper jaw locatedanterior to the quadrate, allowing two simultaneous jaw joints:[33] an anterior "mammalian" joint between the dentary and squamosal and aposterior "reptilian" joint between the quadrate and articular. This "twin-jointed jaw" can be seen in latecynodonts and earlymammaliforms.[34]Morganucodon is one of the first discovered and most thoroughly studied of the mammaliforms, since an unusually large number of morganucodont fossils have been found. It is an example of a nearly perfect evolutionary intermediate between the mammal-like reptiles and extant mammals.[35]

Early mammals

[edit]

The earliest mammals were generally small animals, and were likelynocturnalinsectivores. This suggests a plausible source of evolutionary pressure: with these small bones in the middle ear, a mammal has extended its range of hearing for higher-pitched sounds which would improve the detection of insects in the dark.[36]

The evidence that the malleus and incus arehomologous to the reptilian articular and quadrate was originally embryological, and since this discovery an abundance oftransitional fossils has both supported the conclusion and given a detailed history of the transition.[37] The evolution of thestapes (from thecolumella) was an earlier and distinct event.[38][39]

The evolution of the mammalian middle ear appears to have occurred in two steps. A partial middle ear formed by the departure of postdentary bones from the dentary, and happened independently in the ancestors of monotremes andtherians. The second step was the transition to a definite mammalian middle ear, and evolved independently at least three times in the ancestors of today's monotremes, marsupials and placentals.[40]

Fossil evidence for mammal-like jaws and ears

[edit]

As the dentary bone of the lower jaw continued to enlarge during the Triassic, the older quadrate-articular joint fell out of use. Some of the bones were lost, but thequadrate, thearticular, and theangular bones became free-floating and associated with thestapes. This occurred at least twice in themammaliformes. Themultituberculates had jaw joints that consisted of only the dentary and squamosal bones, and the quadrate and articular bones were part of the middle ear. Other features of their teeth, jaws and skulls are significantly different from those of mammals.[23][41]

Hadrocodium

[edit]

In the lineage most closely related to mammals, the jaws ofHadrocodium (about 195M years ago in the very early Jurassic) suggest that it may have been the first to have a nearly fully mammalian middle ear: it lacks the trough at the rear of the lower jaw, over which the eardrum stretched in therapsids and earlier mammaliformes. The absence of this trough suggests thatHadrocodium's ear was part of the cranium, as it is in mammals, and that the former articular and quadrate had migrated to the middle ear and become the malleus and incus.Hadrocodium's dentary has a "bay" at the rear which mammals lack, a hint that the dentary bone retained the same shape as if the articular and quadrate had remained part of the jaw joint.[42] However, several studies have cast doubt on whetherHadrocodium did indeed possess a definitive mammalian middle ear;Hadrocodium likely had an ossified connection between the middle ear and the jaw, which is not visible in the fossil evidence due to limited preservation.[43][44] Researchers now hypothesize that the definitive mammalian middle ear did not emerge any earlier than the late Jurassic (~163M years ago).[44]

Teinolophos

[edit]

It has been suggested that a relatively large trough in the jaw bone of the early CretaceousmonotremeTeinolophos provides evidence of a pre-mammalian jaw joint, because therapsids and many mammaliforms had such troughs in which the articular and angular bones "docked". Thus,Teinolophos had a pre-mammalian middle ear, indicating that the mammalian middle ear ossicles evolved independently in monotremes and in other mammals.[45] A more recent analysis ofTeinolophos concluded that the trough was a channel for the large vibration and electrical sensory nerves terminating in the bill (a defining feature of the modern platypus). Thus, the trough is not evidence thatTeinolophos had a pre-mammalian jaw joint and a pre-mammalian middle ear.[46]

Yanoconodon

[edit]

A recently discovered intermediate form is the primitive mammalYanoconodon, which lived approximately 125 million years ago in theMesozoic era. InYanoconodon the ossicles have separated from the jaw and serve the hearing function in the middle ear, yet maintain a slender connection to the jaw via the ossifiedMeckel's cartilage.[47][44] Maintaining a connection via the ossified Meckel's cartilage may have been evolutionary advantageous since the auditory ossicles were not connected to the cranium inYanoconodon (as they are inextant mammals), and required structural support via Meckel's cartilage.[48]

Effects on hearing

[edit]

Thefrequency range and sensitivity of theear is dependent on the shape and arrangement of the middle-ear bones. In the reptilian lineage, hearing depends on the conduction of low-frequency vibrations through the ground or bony structures (such as thecolumella). By modifying the articular bone, quadrate bone, and columella into small ossicles, mammals were able to hear a wider range of high-frequency airborne vibrations.[49] Hearing within mammals is further aided by atympanum in the outer ear and an elongated lagena (cochlea) in the inner ear.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^Allin EF (December 1975). "Evolution of the mammalian middle ear".Journal of Morphology.147 (4):403–437.doi:10.1002/jmor.1051470404.PMID 1202224.S2CID 25886311.
  2. ^Meier & Ruf (2016), page 270, Introduction, "The study of the mammalian middle ear has been one of the central themes of vertebrate morphological research of the last 200 years."
  3. ^Cuffey CA (2001)."The Fossil Record: Evolution or "Scientific Creation": Mammal-Like Reptiles". GCSSEPM Foundation. Archived fromthe original on May 1, 2009. Retrieved2009-06-17.
  4. ^"Jaws to ears in the ancestors of mammals". UC Berkeley. Retrieved20 January 2018.
  5. ^abMaier W, Ruf I (February 2016)."Evolution of the mammalian middle ear: a historical review".Journal of Anatomy.228 (2):270–83.doi:10.1111/joa.12379.PMC 4718169.PMID 26397963.
  6. ^Reichert, Karl (1837). "Ueber die Visceralbogen der Wirbelthiere im Allgemeinen und deren Metamorphosen bei den Vögeln und Säugethieren" [On the visceral arches of vertebrates in general and their metamorphoses in birds and mammals].Archiv für Anatomie, Physiologie und wissenschaftliche Medicin (in German):120–222.
  7. ^Gaupp E. "Zur Entwickelungsgeschichte und vergleichen Morphologie des Schädels von Echidna aculeata var. ehenden typical" [On the developmental history and comparative morphology of the skull ofEchidna aculeata var. typical].Richard Semon Fortschungsreisen (in German).3:539–788.
  8. ^Takechi M, Kuratani S (2010). "History of Studies on Mammalian Middle Ear Evolution: A Comparative Morphological and Developmental Biology Perspective".Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution.314B (6):417–433.doi:10.1002/jez.b.21347.PMID 20700887.
  9. ^Appel TA (1987).The Cuvier–Geoffroy Debate: French Biology in the Decades before Darwin. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 206–207.ISBN 0-19-504138-0.
  10. ^Shubin, Neil (2009).Your inner fish: a journey into the 3.5-billion-year histor of the human body (1 ed.). New York: Vintage Books.ISBN 978-0-307-27745-9.
  11. ^Novacek MJ (1993). Hall BK, Hanken J (eds.).The Skull. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. pp. 438–545.ISBN 0-226-31568-1. Novacek references these early works:Meckel JF (1820).Handbuch der Menschlichen Anatomie [Handbook of Human Anatomy] (in German). Halle: In den Buchhandlungen des Hallischen Waisenhauses.Reichert KB (1837). "Ueber die Visceralbogen der Wirbelthiere im Allegemeinen und deren Metamorphosen bei den Vögln und Säugethieren" [On the visceral arches of the vertebrates in general and their metamorphoses among the birds and mammals].Archiv für Anatomie, Physiologie, und wissenschaftliche Medizin (in German). Leipzig:120–122.Gaupp E (1913). "Die Reichertsche Theorie (Hammer-, Amboss- und Kieferfrage)" [The Reichert theory (question of the hammer, anvil and stirrup)].Archiv für Anatomie und Entwicklungsgeschichte (in German):1–416.
  12. ^Goodrich ES (1958) [1934].Studies on the Structure and Development of Vertebrates. Dover. p. 474.
  13. ^Crompton AW, Jenkins FA (1973). "Mammals from Reptiles: A Review of Mammalian Origins".Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences.1:131–155.Bibcode:1973AREPS...1..131C.doi:10.1146/annurev.ea.01.050173.001023.
  14. ^Kühne WG (1958). "Rhaetische Triconodonten aus Glamorgan, ihre Stellung zwischen den Klassen Reptilia und Mammalia und ihre Bedeutung für die REICHART'sche Theorie" [Rhaetic triconodonts from Glamorgen, their place between the Reptilia and Mammalia classes and their meaning for the Reichart theory].Paläontologische Zeitschrift (in German).32 (3/4):197–235.doi:10.1007/BF02989032.S2CID 128828761.
  15. ^Gilbert SF (2003).Developmental biology (7th ed.). Sunderland, Mass: Sinauer Associates. p. 435.ISBN 0-87893-258-5.
  16. ^Mallo M (March 2001)."Formation of the middle ear: recent progress on the developmental and molecular mechanisms".Developmental Biology.231 (2):410–419.doi:10.1006/dbio.2001.0154.PMID 11237469.
  17. ^Raff RA (December 2007). "Written in stone: fossils, genes and evo-devo".Nature Reviews Genetics.8 (12):911–920.doi:10.1038/nrg2225.PMID 18007648.S2CID 7730039.
  18. ^Wilson J, Tucker AS (February 2004)."Fgf and Bmp signals repress the expression of Bapx1 in the mandibular mesenchyme and control the position of the developing jaw joint".Developmental Biology.266 (1):138–150.doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2003.10.012.PMID 14729484.
  19. ^Tucker AS, Watson RP, Lettice LA, Yamada G, Hill RE (March 2004)."Bapx1 regulates patterning in the middle ear: altered regulatory role in the transition from the proximal jaw during vertebrate evolution".Development.131 (6):1235–1245.doi:10.1242/dev.01017.PMID 14973294.
  20. ^A survey of the genes involved in the development of the vertebrate middle ear is given inChapman SC (January 2011)."Can you hear me now? Understanding vertebrate middle ear development".Frontiers in Bioscience.16 (2):1675–92.doi:10.2741/3813.PMC 3065862.PMID 21196256.
  21. ^Sienknecht UJ (July 2013). "Developmental origin and fate of middle ear structures".Hearing Research.301:19–26.doi:10.1016/j.heares.2013.01.019.PMID 23396272.S2CID 24282035.
  22. ^White T."Unit 430: Mammalia: Overview".PALAEOS: The Trace of Life on Earth. palaeos.com. Archived fromthe original on June 15, 2008. Retrieved2008-07-21.
  23. ^abCowen R (2000).History of life. Oxford: Blackwell Science. p. 432.ISBN 0-632-04444-6.
  24. ^Masali M (October 1992). "The ear ossicles and the evolution of the primate ear: A biomechanical approach".Human Evolution.7 (4). Springer Netherlands:1–5.doi:10.1007/BF02436407.S2CID 59361142.
  25. ^White T."Amniota".PALAEOS: The Trace of Life on Earth. palaeos.com. Archived fromthe original on 30 August 2008. Retrieved2008-07-21.
  26. ^Theobald D (2004)."29+ Evidences for Macroevolution: Part 1, Example 2: reptile-mammals". TalkOrigins. Retrieved2009-06-17.
  27. ^Laurin M (January–March 1998). "The importance of global parsimony and historical bias in understanding tetrapod evolution. Part I. Systematics, middle ear evolution and jaw suspension".Annales des Sciences Naturelles - Zoologie et Biologie Animale.19 (1):1–42.doi:10.1016/S0003-4339(98)80132-9.
  28. ^Laurin M."Hearing in Stegocephalians".Tree of Life. Tree of Life Project. Retrieved2008-07-21.
  29. ^Müller J, Tsuji LA (2007)."Impedance-matching hearing in Paleozoic reptiles: evidence of advanced sensory perception at an early stage of amniote evolution".PLoS ONE.2 (9) e889.Bibcode:2007PLoSO...2..889M.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000889.PMC 1964539.PMID 17849018.
  30. ^Fay RR, Manley GA, Popper AN (2004).Evolution of the vertebrate auditory system. Berlin: Springer.ISBN 0-387-21089-X.
  31. ^Luo ZX (December 2007)."Transformation and diversification in early mammal evolution"(PDF).Nature.450 (7172):1011–1019.Bibcode:2007Natur.450.1011L.doi:10.1038/nature06277.PMID 18075580.S2CID 4317817. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on November 27, 2012.
  32. ^Sidor CA (July 2001). "Simplification as a trend in synapsid cranial evolution".Evolution.55 (7):1419–42.doi:10.1554/0014-3820(2001)055[1419:saatis]2.0.co;2.PMID 11525465.
  33. ^Benton MJ (1990).Vertebrate palaeontology: biology and evolution. Unwin Hyman. p. 229.ISBN 0-04-566001-8.
  34. ^Colbert E (1991).Evolution of the vertebrates: a history of the backboned animals through time. New York: Wiley-Liss. p. 228.ISBN 0-471-85074-8.
  35. ^Kermack KA, Mussett F, Rigney HW (January 1981). "The skull of Morganucodon".Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society.71 (1).Linnean Society of London:1–158.doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.1981.tb01127.x.
  36. ^Biello D (2007-03-14)."From Jaw to Ear: Transition Fossil Reveals Ear Evolution in Action". Scientific American. Retrieved2009-06-17.Now hear this: early mammal fossil shows how sensitive ear bones evolved
  37. ^Bowler PJ (1996). "Chapter 6: The Origin of Birds and Mammals".Life's splendid drama: evolutionary biology and the reconstruction of life's ancestry, 1860-1940. University of Chicago Press.ISBN 0-226-06921-4.
  38. ^Janvier P (2002).Early vertebrates. Oxford Monographs on Geology and Geophysics, 33. Clarendon Press. p. 56.ISBN 978-0-19-852646-9.
  39. ^Zimmer C (15 October 2008)."The Shoulder Bone's Connected to the Ear Bone…". Discover. Archived fromthe original on 17 October 2008. Retrieved16 October 2008.
  40. ^Resolving the evolution of the mammalian middle ear using Bayesian inference
  41. ^White T."Mammaliformes".PALAEOS: The Trace of Life on Earth. palaeos.com. Archived fromthe original on June 4, 2008. Retrieved2008-07-21.
  42. ^White T."Symmetrodonta".PALAEOS: The Trace of Life on Earth. palaeos.com. Archived fromthe original on July 3, 2008. Retrieved2008-07-21.
  43. ^Wang, Y; Hu, Y; Meng, J; Li, C (2001). "An Ossified Meckel's Cartilage in Two Cretaceous Mammals and Origin of the Mammalian Middle Ear".Science.294 (5541):357–361.Bibcode:2001Sci...294..357W.doi:10.1126/science.1063830.ISSN 0036-8075.PMID 11598297.S2CID 42819140.
  44. ^abcRamírez-Chaves HE, Weisbecker V, Wroe S, Phillips MJ (2016)."Resolving the evolution of the mammalian middle ear using Bayesian inference".Frontiers in Zoology.13 (1): 39.doi:10.1186/s12983-016-0171-z.PMC 4997658.PMID 27563341.
  45. ^Rich TH, Hopson JA, Musser AM, Flannery TF, Vickers-Rich P (February 2005). "Independent origins of middle ear bones in monotremes and therians".Science.307 (5711):910–914.Bibcode:2005Sci...307..910R.doi:10.1126/science.1105717.PMID 15705848.S2CID 3048437.
  46. ^Rowe T, Rich TH, Vickers-Rich P, Springer M, Woodburne MO (January 2008)."The oldest platypus and its bearing on divergence timing of the platypus and echidna clades".Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.105 (4):1238–1242.Bibcode:2008PNAS..105.1238R.doi:10.1073/pnas.0706385105.PMC 2234122.PMID 18216270.
  47. ^Myers PZ (March 16, 2007)."Yanoconodon, a transitional fossil".Pharyngula: Evolution, development, and random biological ejaculations from a godless liberal.
  48. ^Meng, J; Wang, Y; Li, C (April 2011). "Transitional mammalian middle ear from a new Cretaceous jehol eutriconodont".Nature.472 (7342):181–185.Bibcode:2011Natur.472..181M.doi:10.1038/nature09921.PMID 21490668.S2CID 4428972.
  49. ^Köppl C (11 August 2009)."Evolution of sound localization in land vertebrates".Current Biology.19 (15):R635 –R639.doi:10.1016/j.cub.2009.05.035.PMID 19674542.

Further reading

[edit]

External links

[edit]
Evolution
Population
genetics
Development
Oftaxa
Oforgans
Ofprocesses
Tempo and modes
Speciation
History
Philosophy
Related
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Evolution_of_mammalian_auditory_ossicles&oldid=1314051181"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp