|  | This article has multiple issues. Please helpimprove it or discuss these issues on thetalk page.(Learn how and when to remove these messages)(Learn how and when to remove this message) 
 
 | 
|  | |
|  European Union |  NATO | 
|---|---|


TheEuropean Union (EU) and theNorth Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) are two main treaty-basedWestern organisations for cooperation between member states, both headquartered inBrussels, Belgium. Their natures are different and they operate in different spheres: NATO is a purely intergovernmental organisation functioning as a military alliance, which serves to implement article 5 of theNorth Atlantic Treaty on collective territorial defence.[1] The EU on the other hand is a partly supranational and partly intergovernmentalsui generis entity akin to aconfederation[2][3] that entails wider economic and politicalintegration. Unlike NATO, the EU pursues aforeign policy in its own right—based on consensus, and member states have equipped it with tools in the field of defence and crisis management; theCommon Security and Defence Policy (CSDP)structure.
The memberships of the EU and NATO are distinct, and some EU member states are traditionally neutral on defence issues. The EU and NATO have respectively27 and32 member states, of which 23 are members of both. Another four NATO members are EU applicants—Albania, Montenegro, North Macedonia, and Turkey—and another one, the United Kingdom, is aformer EU member. Iceland and Norway have opted to remain outside of the EU, but do participate in theEuropean Single Market as part of theirEuropean Economic Area (EEA) membership. Four non-NATO states are members of the EU: Austria, Cyprus, Ireland, and Malta. Several EU and NATO member states were formerly members of theWarsaw Pact.[4]
The EU has its own mutual defence clause in Articles 42(7) and 222 of theTreaty on European Union (TEU) and theTreaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), respectively. TheCSDP command and control structure is however much smaller than theNATO Command Structure (NCS), and the extent to which the CSDP should evolve to form a full defence arm for the EU that is able to implement the EU mutual defence clause in its own right is a point of contention. TheUnited Kingdom (UK) had objected to this, when it was still an EU member state. At the UK's insistence in the negotiations leading to theTreaty of Lisbon, Article 42.2 of TEU specified thatNATO shall be the main forum for the implementation of collective self-defence for EU member states that are also NATO members.
The 2002Berlin Plus agreement and 2018 Joint Declaration[5] provide for cooperation between the EU and NATO, including that NCS resources may be used for the conduct of the EU's CSDP missions.[6]
TheWestern Union, established to implement the 1948Treaty of Brussels signed by Belgium, France, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, and the United Kingdom, represents a precursor to both NATO and the EU's defence arm, theCommon Security and Defence Policy (CSDP).WUDO's organisational chart as of November 1948, in which solid and dashed lines indicate control and liaison lines, respectively:[7]
| Consultative Council (foreign or prime ministers) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Permanent Commission (4 ambassadors in London plus Foreign Office representative) | Defence Committee (defence ministers) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Military Supply Board | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Chiefs of Staff Committee (WUCOS) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Finance Committee | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| UN General Assembly Special Committee | Security Committee | Military Committee and Combined Staff of WUCOS | Commanders-in-Chief Committee and its Chairman | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| C-in-C Western Europe Land Forces | C-in-C Western Europe (Tactical) Air Force | Flag Officer Western Europe | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Since theend of World War II, mostsovereignEuropean countries have entered into treaties and thereby co-operated and harmonised policies (orpooled sovereignty) in an increasing number of areas, in theEuropean integration project or theconstruction of Europe (French:la construction européenne). The following timeline outlines the legal inception of theEuropean Union (EU)—the principal framework for this unification. The EU inherited many of its presentorganizations,institutions, and responsibilities from theEuropean Communities (EC), which were founded in the 1950s in the spirit of theSchuman Declaration.
| Legend: S: signing F: entry into force T: termination E: expiry de facto supersession Rel. w/ EC/EU framework: de facto inside outside |  European Union(EU) | [Cont.] | ||||||||||||||||
|  European Communities(EC) | (Pillar I) | |||||||||||||||||
| European Atomic Energy Community (EAEC or EURATOM) | [Cont.] | |||||||||||||||||
|  /  /  /  European Coal and Steel Community(ECSC) | ||||||||||||||||||
| European Economic Community(EEC) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Schengen Rules | European Community (EC) | |||||||||||||||||
| TREVI | Justice and Home Affairs(JHA,pillar III) | |||||||||||||||||
|  /  North Atlantic Treaty Organisation(NATO) | [Cont.] | Police and Judicial Co-operation in Criminal Matters(PJCC,pillar III) | ||||||||||||||||
|   Anglo-French alliance | [Defence armhanded toNATO] | European Political Co-operation (EPC) | Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP,pillar II) | |||||||||||||||
|  Western Union (WU) |  /  Western European Union (WEU) | [Tasks defined following the WEU's 1984reactivationhanded to theEU] | ||||||||||||||||
| [Social, cultural taskshanded toCoE] | [Cont.] | |||||||||||||||||
|  Council of Europe(CoE) | ||||||||||||||||||
| Entente Cordiale S: 8 April 1904 | Davignon report S: 27 October 1970 | European Council conclusions S: 2 December 1975 | ||||||||||||||||
Had its founding treaty not failed to acquire ratification in the French Parliament in 1954, the European Defence Community would have entailed a pan-European military, divided into national components, and had a common budget, common arms, centralized military procurement, and institutions. The EDC would have had an integral link to NATO, forming an autonomous European pillar in the Atlantic alliance.

Following the establishment of the ESDI and the St. Malo declaration,US Secretary of StateMadeleine Albright were among others who voiced concern that an independent European security pillar could undermine NATO, as she put forth the three famous D's:
Our [...] task is working together to develop [the ESDI] within [NATO], which the United States has strongly endorsed. We enthusiastically support any such measures that enhance European capabilities. The United States welcomes a more capable European partner, with modern, flexible military forces capable of putting out fires in Europe's own back yard and working with us through [NATO] to defend our common interests. The key to a successful initiative is to focus on practical military capabilities. Any initiative must avoid preempting [NATO] decision-making byde-linking ESDI from NATO, avoidduplicating existing efforts, and avoiddiscriminating against non-EU members. [...]
— US Secretary of StateAlbright,North Atlantic Council (8 December 1998)[8]

TheBerlin Plus agreement enablesEU operations to be planned and conducted at the military strategic and operational level with recourse to assets and capabilities in theNATO Command Structure (NCS). In such an event, an Operational Headquarters (OHQ) would be set up within NATO'sSupreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe (SHAPE) in Mons, Belgium. SHAPE is the main headquarters ofAllied Command Operations (ACO).
When the NCS provides the OHQ, theDeputy Supreme Allied Commander Europe (DSACEUR) acts as Operation Commander (OpCdr).
The Berlin Plus agreement requires that the use of NATO assets by the EU is subject to a "right of first refusal", i.e. NATO must first decline to intervene in a given crisis,[9][10] and contingent on unanimous approval among NATO states, including those outside of the EU. For example, Turkish reservations aboutOperation Concordia using NATO assets delayed its deployment by more than five months.[11]
TheEuropean External Action Service's (EEAS)Military Staff (EUMS), situated in theKortenberg building in Brussels, has a permanent NATO liaison team and runs a permanent EU cell at NATO'sSupreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe (SHAPE) inMons.
The CSDP entailscollective self-defence amongst member states. This responsibility is based on Article 42.7 of TEU, which states that this responsibility does not prejudice the specific character of the security and defence policy of certain member states, referring to policies of neutrality. SeeNeutral country§European Union for discussion on this subject. According to theArticle 42.7 "If a Member State is the victim of armed aggression on its territory, the other Member States shall have towards it an obligation of aid and assistance by all the means in their power, in accordance with Article 51 of the United Nations Charter. This shall not prejudice the specific character of the security and defence policy of certain Member States." Article 42.2 furthermore specifies thatNATO shall be the main forum for the implementation of collective self-defence for EU member states that are also NATO members.
The EU does not have a permanent military command structure. However it has been agreed thatNorth Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) military structures may be used for the conduct of the EU's CSDP missions under theBerlin Plus agreement. TheMilitary Planning and Conduct Capability (MPCC), established in 2017 and to be strengthened in 2020, does however represent the EU's first step in developing a permanent military OHQ. In parallel, the newly establishedEuropean Defence Fund (EDF) marks the first time theEU budget is used to finance multinational defence projects.
TheEU command and control (C2) structure is directed by political bodies composed ofmember states' representatives, and generally requires unanimous decisions. As of April 2019:[12]
| Political strategic level:[5] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ISS | EUCO Pres. (EUCO) | Chain of command | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Coordination/support | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| SatCen | CIVCOM | HR/VP (FAC) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| INTCEN | HR/VP (PMG) | HR/VP (PSC)[6] |       CEUMC (EUMC) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CMPD |     DGEUMS[3] (EUMS) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Military/civilian strategic level: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|     Dir MPCC[3] (MPCC) | JSCC | Civ OpCdrCPCC[1] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Operational level: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| MFCdr[4] (MFHQ) | HoM[1] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tactical level: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CC[2] Land | CC[2] Air | CC[2] Mar | Other CCs[2] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Forces | Forces | Forces | Forces | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NATO's command structure, under theNorth Atlantic Council and theNATO Military Committee, is split intoAllied Command Operations, responsible for all military operations, andAllied Command Transformation responsible for capability development.


The memberships of the EU and NATO are distinct. The EU and NATO have respectively27 and32 member states, of which 23 states are members of both.
The four EU member states which are not members of NATO (Austria,Cyprus,Ireland andMalta) held positions ofneutrality during the Cold War, which they have since maintained. However, all but Cyprus are members of NATO'sPartnership for Peace. Cyprus is the only EU member state that is neither a full member of NATO nor participates in the Partnership for Peace. Any treaty concerning Cyprus' participation in NATO would likely be blocked byTurkey because of theCyprus dispute.[13] The2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine reignited debate surrounding NATO membership in several countries, with Finland and Sweden both joining NATO after decades of neutrality.
Of the 32 NATO member states, 30 are European states. The 7 European states which are NATO members, but not EU members, include four states that have applied for EU membership (Albania, Montenegro, North Macedonia, and Turkey), as well as the United Kingdom which is aformer EU member. The two others — Iceland and Norway — have opted to remain outside of the EU, however participate in theEU's single market.
Several EU member states were formerly members of the NATO rivalWarsaw Pact.
|  European Union (in respect of its defence arm, theCommon Security and Defence Policy) |  NATO | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Mutual defence clause | Article 42.7 of theconsolidated version of the Treaty on European Union: "If a Member State is the victim of armed aggression on its territory, the other Member States shall have towards it an obligation of aid and assistance by all the means in their power, in accordance with Article 51 of the United Nations Charter. This shall not prejudice the specific character of the security and defence policy of certain Member States. [...]" | Article 5 of theNorth Atlantic Treaty: "The Parties agree that an armed attack against one or more of them [on their territory] shall be considered an attack against them all and consequently they agree that, if such an armed attack occurs, each of them, in exercise of the right of individual or collective self-defence recognised by Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations, will assist the Party or Parties so attacked by taking forthwith, individually and in concert with the other Parties, such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area. [...]" | |
| Political strategic organisation | |||
| Highest office | High Representative (HR/VP) | Secretary General | |
| Principal decision-making body | Foreign Affairs Council | North Atlantic Council | |
| Liaison body | European External Action Service | International Staff | |
| Seat | Kortenberg building (Brussels, Belgium) |  NATO headquarters (Brussels, Belgium) | |
| Military strategic organisation | |||
| Supreme commander |     Director of the Military Planning and Conduct Capability |      Supreme Allied Commander Europe | |
| Headquarters |  Military Planning and Conduct Capability (Brussels, Belgium) |  Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe (Mons, Belgium) | |
| Chair ofchiefs of defence assembly |      Chairman of the European Union Military Committee |      Chair of the NATO Military Committee | |
| Chiefs of defence assembly |  European Union Military Committee |  NATO Military Committee | |
| Advisory body |  European Union Military Staff |  International Military Staff | |
| EU Membership | Permanent Structured Cooperation | NATO Membership | |
| Member states of both the EU and NATO | |||
|  Belgium | Founder | Founder | Founder | 
|  Bulgaria | 2007 | Founder | 2004 | 
|  Croatia | 2013 | Founder | 2009 | 
|  Czech Republic | 2004 | Founder | 1999 | 
|  Denmark | 1973 | 2023 | Founder | 
|  Estonia | 2004 | Founder | 2004 | 
|  Finland | 1995 | Founder | 2023 | 
|  France | Founder | Founder | Founder | 
|  Germany | Founder | Founder | 1955 | 
|  Greece | 1981 | Founder | 1952 | 
|  Hungary | 2004 | Founder | 1999 | 
|  Italy | Founder | Founder | Founder | 
|  Latvia | 2004 | Founder | 2004 | 
|  Lithuania | 2004 | Founder | 2004 | 
|  Luxembourg | Founder | Founder | Founder | 
|  Netherlands | Founder | Founder | Founder | 
|  Poland | 2004 | Founder | 1999 | 
|  Portugal | 1986 | Founder | Founder | 
|  Romania | 2007 | Founder | 2004 | 
|  Slovakia | 2004 | Founder | 2004 | 
|  Slovenia | 2004 | Founder | 2004 | 
|  Spain | 1986 | Founder | 1982 | 
|  Sweden | 1995 | Founder | 2024 | 
| Non-NATO EU member states | |||
|  Austria | 1995 | Founder | Partnership for Peace | 
|  Cyprus | 2004 | Founder | No | 
|  Ireland | 1973 | Founder | Partnership for Peace | 
|  Malta | 2004 | No | Partnership for Peace | 
| Non-EU NATO member states | |||
|  Albania | Candidate | — | 2009 | 
|  Iceland | No | — | Founder | 
|  Montenegro | Candidate | — | 2017 | 
|  North Macedonia | Candidate | — | 2020 | 
|  Norway | Defence Agency agreement | — | Founder | 
|  Turkey | Candidate | — | 1952 | 
|  United Kingdom | No | — | Founder | 
| European countries outside both the EU and NATO | |||
|  Andorra | No | — | No | 
|  Armenia | No | — | Individual Partnership Action Plan | 
|  Azerbaijan | No | — | Individual Partnership Action Plan | 
|  Belarus | No | — | Partnership for Peace | 
|  Bosnia and Herzegovina | Candidate | — | Membership Action Plan | 
|  Georgia | Candidate | — | Intensified Dialogue | 
|  Kazakhstan | No | — | Individual Partnership Action Plan | 
|  Kosovo | Applicant / Potential candidate | — | No | 
|  Liechtenstein | No | — | No | 
|  Moldova | Candidate | — | Individual Partnership Action Plan | 
|  Monaco | No | — | No | 
|  Russia | No | — | Partnership for Peace | 
|  San Marino | No | — | No | 
|  Serbia | Candidate | — | Individual Partnership Action Plan | 
|  Switzerland | Defence Agency agreement | — | Partnership for Peace | 
|  Ukraine | Candidate | — | Intensified Dialogue | 
|  Vatican City | No | — | No | 
| NATO member states located in North America, which are therefore ineligible for EU membership | |||
|  Canada | — | — | Founder | 
|  United States | — | — | Founder | 
| Members of NATO'sPartnership for Peace located outside Europe, which are therefore neither eligible for EU nor NATO membership | |||
|  Kyrgyzstan | — | — | Partnership for Peace | 
|  Tajikistan | — | — | Partnership for Peace | 
|  Turkmenistan | — | — | Partnership for Peace | 
|  Uzbekistan | — | — | Partnership for Peace |