The term "Euarchonta"[2] (meaning "true rulers") appeared in 1999, when molecular evidence suggested that themorphology-basedArchonta should be trimmed down to excludeChiroptera.[3] Further DNA sequence analyses[4][5][6] supported the Euarchonta hypothesis. Despite multiple papers pointing out that some mitochondrial sequences showed unusual properties (particularly murid rodents and hedgehogs) and were likely distorting the overall tree,[7][8] and despite earlier studies[6] showing near total congruence of mtDNA-based and nuclear-based trees when such sequences were excluded, some authors continued to produce misleading trees.[9] A study investigatingretrotransposonpresence/absence data has claimed strong support for Euarchonta.[10] Some interpretations of the molecular data linkPrimates andDermoptera in aclade (mirorder) known asPrimatomorpha, which is the sister ofScandentia. In some, the Dermoptera are a member of the primates rather than a sister group. Other interpretations link the Dermoptera and Scandentia together in a group calledSundatheria as the sister group of the primates.
The current hypothesis, based on molecular clock evidence, suggests that the Euarchonta arose in thelate Cretaceous period, about 88 million years ago, and diverged 86.2 million years ago into the groups of tree shrews and Primatomorpha. The latter diverged prior to 79.6 million years into the orders of Primates and colugos.[11] The earliest fossil species often ascribed to Euarchonta (Purgatorius coracis) dates to the earlyPaleocene, 65 million years ago,[1] but one study claims it to be a non-placental eutherian.[12] Although it is known that Scandentia is one of the most basal clades of Euarchontoglires, the exact phylogenetic position is not yet considered resolved, and it may be a sister of Glires, Primatomorpha or Dermoptera or to all other Euarchontoglires.[13][14][15][16]
^Madsen, O.; Scally, M.; Douady, C.J.; Kao, D.J.; DeBry, R.W.; Adkins, R.; Amrine, H.M.; Stanhope, M.J.; de Jong, W.W.; Springer, M.S. (2001). "Parallel adaptive radiations in two major clades of placental mammals".Nature.409 (6820):610–614.Bibcode:2001Natur.409..610M.doi:10.1038/35054544.PMID11214318.S2CID4398233.
^abWaddell, P.J.; Kishino, H.; Ota, R. (2001). "A phylogenetic foundation for comparative mammalian genomics".Genome Informatics Series.12:141–154.PMID11791233.
^Zhou, Xuming; Sun, Fengming; Xu, Shixia; Yang, Guang; Li, Ming (2015-03-01). "The position of tree shrews in the mammalian tree: Comparing multi-gene analyses with phylogenomic results leaves monophyly of Euarchonta doubtful".Integrative Zoology.10 (2):186–198.doi:10.1111/1749-4877.12116.ISSN1749-4877.PMID25311886.
^Meredith, Robert W.; Janečka, Jan E.; Gatesy, John; Ryder, Oliver A.; Fisher, Colleen A.; Teeling, Emma C.; Goodbla, Alisha; Eizirik, Eduardo; Simão, Taiz L. L. (2011-10-28). "Impacts of the Cretaceous Terrestrial Revolution and KPg Extinction on Mammal Diversification".Science.334 (6055):521–524.Bibcode:2011Sci...334..521M.doi:10.1126/science.1211028.ISSN0036-8075.PMID21940861.S2CID38120449.
.jpg)
