An Act to make provision to require Ministers of the Crown and others when making strategic decisions about the exercise of their functions to have regard to the desirability of reducingsocio-economic inequalities; to reform and harmonise equality law and restate the greater part of the enactments relating to discrimination and harassment related to certain personal characteristics; to enable certain employers to be required to publish information about the differences in pay between male and female employees; to prohibit victimisation in certain circumstances; to require the exercise of certain functions to be with regard to the need to eliminate discrimination and other prohibited conduct; to enable duties to be imposed in relation to the exercise of public procurement functions; to increaseequality of opportunity; to amend the law relating to rights and responsibilities in family relationships; and for connected purposes.
The act has broadly the same goals as the four major EUEqual Treatment Directives, whose provisions it mirrors and implements.[3] However, the Act also offers protection beyond the EU directives, protecting against discrimination based on a person's nationality and citizenship[4][5] and also extending individuals' rights in areas of life beyond the workplace in religion or belief, disability, age, sex,sexual orientation andgender reassignment.[6][7]
The Act includes provisions for single-sex services where the restrictions are "a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim".[8] In the case of disability, employers and service providers are under a duty to makereasonable adjustments to their workplaces to overcome barriers experienced by disabled people. In this regard, the Equality Act 2010 did not change the law. Under s.217, withlimited exceptions the Act does not apply toNorthern Ireland.[9]
Polly Toynbee wrote that the bill, which was drafted under the guidance ofHarriet Harman, was "Labour's biggest idea for 11 years. A public-sector duty to close the gap between rich and poor will tackle the class divide in a way that no other policy has... This new duty to narrow the gap would permeate every aspect of government policy. Its possible ramifications are mind-bogglingly immense." One cabinet member described it as "socialism in one clause".[12] This part of the legislation was never brought into force, except for Scottish devolved authorities.[13][14]Sections 104–105 of the Act extend until 2030 the exemption from sex discrimination law, which allows political parties to createall-women shortlists.[15] The exemption was previously permitted by theSex Discrimination (Election Candidates) Act 2002.
The parliamentary process was completed, following a debate, shortly after 11 pm on 6 April 2010, when amendments by the House of Lords were accepted in full.[16]
In April 2008,Solicitor GeneralVera Baird announced that as part of the Single Equality Bill, legislation would be introduced to repeal parts of theAct of Settlement 1701 that preventRoman Catholics or those who marry Roman Catholics from ascending to the throne, and to change the inheritance of the monarchy fromcognatic primogeniture toabsolute primogeniture, so that the first-born heir would inherit the throne regardless of gender or religion.[17]
However, later in 2008, the Attorney GeneralBaroness Scotland of Asthal decided not to sponsor a change in the law of succession, saying, "To bring about changes to the law on succession would be a complex undertaking involving amendment or repeal of a number of items of related legislation, as well as requiring the consent of legislatures of member nations of the Commonwealth".[18] The published draft bill did not contain any provisions to change the succession laws. Male-preference primogeniture for the British monarchy was instead abolished separately three years after the Equality Act came into force, with the enactment of theSuccession to the Crown Act 2013.
Although the act was never going to change the law with regard to churches from its existing position, nor change the binding European Union law which covers many more Roman Catholics than those living in the United Kingdom, and although the position had been spelled out in the High Court inR (Amicus) v Secretary of State for Trade and Industry,[19] a small number ofRoman Catholic bishops in England and Wales made claims that they might in future be prosecuted under the Equality Act 2010 for refusing to allow women, married men, transgender people, and gay people into the priesthood.[20][21] This claim was rejected by the government. A spokesman said an exemption in the law "covers ministers of religion such as Catholic priests"[20] and a document released by the Government Equalities Office states that "the Equality Bill will not change the existing legal position regarding churches and employment".[22] The legislation was also criticised by Anglican clergy.[23]
Actors and models in the film, television and fashion industries (aBritish Chinese actress for a specific role, for instance).
Special employment training programmes aimed atethnic minorities, ex-offenders,young adults, the long-term unemployed, or people with physical or learning disabilities.
Employment where there are cultural sensitivities (such as a documentary where male victims of domestic violence need to be interviewed by a male researcher, or a gay men's domestic violence helpline).
Where safety or operational efficiency could be jeopardised.
Political parties who use 'protected characteristics' (age, race, religion, sex, sexual orientation)[24] as candidate selection criteria; however, these "Selection arrangements do not include short-listing only such persons as have a particular protected characteristic",[25] other than sex,[26] which may still be used to prejudice selection in some circumstances (e.g.All-women shortlists).
Local support staff who work in embassies and high commissions, by virtue ofdiplomatic immunity.
The UK government has indicated its intention not to bring Part 1 into force with respect to UK public authorities.[27]
However, the Scottish government has brought this section into force with respect to devolved Scottish authorities. It came into force for these authorities on 1 April 2018,[28][29] with the legal requirements placed on these authorities by this part of the Act being referred to by the Scottish government as theFairer Scotland Duty.[14]
The Welsh government also has the power to bring this section into force with respect to devolved Welsh authorities, but has not yet done so.
The duty set out in section 149 requires those public authorities which are subject to it to have due regard to three aims:
to eliminate unlawful discrimination, harassment, victimisation and any other conduct prohibited under the Act,
to advanceequality of opportunity between people who share a protected characteristic and those who do not, and
to foster good relations between those who share a protected characteristic and those who do not.[1]: Section 149
TheCabinet Office'sInformation Note 1/13, "Public Procurement and the Public Sector Equality Duty", noted that public authorities needed to have due regard to this duty when planning and undertakingprocurement activities, stating in particular that whencontracting out public functions, it would be usual to include contract conditions which specified how equality obligations and objectives were to be complied with.[38]
The Equality Act 2010 (Specific Duties) Regulations 2011 (SI 2011–2260), made on 9 September 2011,[39] required public authorities to publish information to demonstrate their compliance with the public sector equality duty and to identify one or more objectives which they thought they should work to achieve.[40]
In 2020, certain groups attempted to legally challenge the EHRC's Code of Practice on "Services, Public Functions and Associations", which attempts to provide practical guidance on implementing the Equality Act, concerning the advice that service providers should in general treat trans people as their acquired gender. The challenge failed to get a hearing before theHigh Court of Justice, because the justice did not consider the case to be arguable.[41]
On 16 April 2025, theSupreme Court of the United Kingdom ruled in the caseFor Women Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers that the act's definition of "woman" "man" and "sex" refers only to "biologicalsex", and that "woman" does not include trans women (even if they have agender recognition certificate). The judges said: "Read fairly and in context, the provisions relating to single-sex services can only be interpreted by reference to biological sex."[42][43][44] However, the judges said they were not ruling more broadly on the definition of "sex" or whether trans women are women in other contexts, saying "it was not the role of the court to adjudicate on the meaning of gender or sex".[45][46]Lord Hodge also re-affirmed that the ruling does not affect the Equality Act 2010's protections from discrimination by the protected characteristic of gender reassignment, acknowledging that trans people were a vulnerable population that "struggle against discrimination and prejudice as they seek to live their lives with dignity". He warned that the judgment should not be seen as "a triumph of one or more groups in our society at the expense of another."[47][48][49] The judges also insisted that despite their decision, trans people can still bring sex discrimination cases "not only against discrimination through the protected characteristic of gender reassignment, but also against direct discrimination, indirect discrimination and harassment in substance in their acquired gender".[50] The judgement also does not change or invalidate theGender Recognition Act 2004 or the process for obtaining a Gender Recognition Certificate.[45][51][52]
In the first legal case to use the "FWS" judgement, Harriet Haynes, who had a gender recognition certificate and an updated birth certificate giving the sex of female, was excluded from the English Blackball Pool Federation's women's competition on the base of legal sex (under FWS, male), and was not discriminated against on the basis of gender reassignment, (someone transitioning from female to male could be eligible.)[53]
^"Myth-Busting: the Equality Bill and Religion"(PDF). Government Equalities Office. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 13 October 2010. Retrieved10 January 2010.In the case of Ministers of Religion and other jobs which exist to promote and represent religion, the Bill recognises that a church may need to impose requirements regarding sexual orientation, sex, marriage and civil partnership or gender reassignment if it is necessary to comply with its teachings or the strongly held beliefs of followers. However, it would not be right to permit such requirements across all jobs within organised religions, such as administrators and accountants, and the Equality Bill makes this clear.
^age, disability, gender reassignment, marriage or civil partnership, pregnancy and maternity, race, religion or belief, sex, and sexual orientation
^s 13 direct discrimination, s 14 discrimination arising from disability, s 15 gender reassignment discrimination: cases of absence from work, s 16 pregnancy and maternity discrimination: non-work cases, s 17 pregnancy and maternity discrimination: work cases, s 18 indirect discrimination; Adjustments for disabled persons: s 19 duty to make adjustments, s 20 failure to comply with duty, s 21 regulations, s 22 comparison by reference to circumstances, s 23 references to particular strands of discrimination, s 24harassment, s 25victimisation
^Employees: s 36 Employees and applicants, s 37 Employees and applicants: harassment, s 38 contract workers; Police officers: s 39 identity of employer, s 40 interpretation; Partners: s 41, partnerships, s 42limited liability partnerships, s 43 interpretation; The Bar: s 44 barristers, s 45 advocates; Office holders: s 46 personal offices, s 47 public offices: appointments, etc, s 48 public offices: recommendations for appointments, etc., s 49 interpretation and exceptions; Qualifications: s 50 qualification bodies, s 51 interpretation; Employment services: s 52 employment service providers, s 53 interpretation; Trade organisations: s 54 trade organisations; Local authority members: s 55 official business of members, s 56 interpretation
^s 57 Non-discrimination rule, s 58 Communications
^Sex equality: s 59 Relevant types of work, s 60 Equal work, s 61 Sex equality clause, s 62 Sex equality rule, s 63 Sex equality rule: consequential alteration of schemes, s 64 Defence of material factor, s 65 Exclusion of sex discrimination provisions, s 66 Sex discrimination in relation to contractual pay;Pregnancy andmaternity equality: s 67 Relevant types of work, s 68 Maternity equality clause, s 69 Maternity equality clause: pay, s 70 Maternity equality rule, s 71 Exclusion of pregnancy and maternity discrimination provisions; Disclosure of information: s 72 Discussions with colleagues, s 73Gender pay gap information; Supplementary: s 74 Colleagues, s 75 Interpretation and exceptions
^s 76 Ships and hovercraft, s 77 Offshore work, s 78 Interpretation and exceptions
^s 182, reasonable adjustments; s 183 improvements to let dwelling houses
^statutory provisions, national security, charities, sport, general, age
![[icon]](/mt/?noimg=&dark=on&url=https%3a%2f%2fen.wikipedia.org%2fwiki%2fFile%3aWiki_letter_w_cropped.svg)
