Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Praefectus urbi

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected fromEparch of the City (Constantinople))
Magistrate of Rome

Periods
Constitution
Political institutions
Assemblies
Ordinary magistrates
Extraordinary magistrates
Public law
Senatus consultum ultimum
Titles and honours

Thepraefectus urbanus, also calledpraefectus urbi orurban prefect in English, wasprefect of the city of Rome, and later also ofConstantinople. The office originated under theRoman kings, continued during the Republic and Empire, and held high importance inlate Antiquity. The office survived thecollapse of the Western Roman Empire, and the last urban prefect of Rome, named Iohannes, is attested in 599.[1] In the East, in Constantinople, the office survived until the 13th century.

Regal period

[edit]

According to Roman tradition, in 753 BC whenRomulusfounded the city of Rome and instituted themonarchy, he also created the office ofcustos urbis (guardian of the city) to serve as the king's chief lieutenant. Appointed by the king to serve for life, thecustos urbis served concurrently as theprinceps Senatus. As the second highest office of state, thecustos urbis was the king's personal representative. In the absence of the king from the city, thecustos urbis exercised all of his powers, which included the powers of convoking theSenate, thepopular assemblies and the exercise of force in the event of an emergency. However, theimperium he possessed was only valid within the walls of Rome.

Under the kings, only three men held the position. The first king Romulus appointed Denter Romulius to serve as the firstcustos urbis, the third kingTullus Hostilius appointedNuma Marcius, and the seventh kingTarquinius Superbus appointedSpurius Lucretius.

Republican period

[edit]

After the expulsion ofTarquinius Superbus in 510 BC and the formation of theRepublic in 509 BC, the office ofcustos urbis remained unaltered: having power only within the actual city of Rome and a life term appointed by theconsuls. Thecustos urbis exercised within the city all the powers of the consuls if they were absent from Rome. These powers included: convoking the Senate andComitia Curiata, and, in times of war, levying and commandinglegions.

The first major change to the office occurred in 487 BC, when the office became an electivemagistracy, elected by theComitia Curiata. The office was only open to former consuls. Around 450 BC, with the coming of thedecemvirs, the office of thecustos urbis was renamed thepraefectus urbi (Prefect of the City of Rome), and was stripped of most of its powers and responsibilities, becoming a merely ceremonial post. Most of the office's powers and responsibilities had been transferred to the urban praetor (praetor urbanus). Thepraefectus urbi was appointed each year for the sole purpose of allowing the consuls to celebrate theLatin Festival, which required them to leave Rome. Thepraefectus urbi no longer held the power to convoke the Senate, or the right of speaking in it, and was appointed by the Consuls instead of being elected.

Imperial period

[edit]

Rome

[edit]
See also:List of urban prefects of Rome

When the firstRoman Emperor,Augustus (r. 27 BC – AD 14), transformed theRoman Republic into theRoman Empire in 27 BC, he reformed the office of Prefect at the suggestion of his minister and friendMaecenas. Again elevated into amagistracy, Augustus granted thepraefectus urbi all the powers needed to maintain order within the city. The office's powers also extended beyond Rome itself to the ports ofOstia and thePortus, as well as a zone of one hundredRoman miles (c. 140 km) around the city.[1] The Prefect's office was called thesecretarium tellurense (secretariat ofTellus). The find-spots of inscriptions honouring Prefects suggest that it was located on theOppian Hill, near theBaths of Trajan.[2] Acting as a quasi-mayor of Rome, the Prefect was the superintendent of all guilds and corporations (collegia), held the responsibility (via thepraefectus annonae) of the city'sprovision with grain from overseas, the oversight of the officials responsible for the drainage of theTiber and the maintenance of the city'ssewers and water supply system, as well as its monuments.[3][4] The provisioning of the city's large population with the grain dole was especially important; when the Prefect failed to secure adequate supplies, riots often broke out.[5]

To enable the Prefect to exercise his authority, thecohortes urbanae, Rome'spolice force, and the nightwatchmen (vigiles) under their prefect (praefectus vigilum), were placed under his command.[6] The Prefect also had the duty of publishing the laws promulgated by the Emperor, and as such acquired a legal jurisdiction.[6] This extended to legal cases between slaves and their masters, patrons and theirfreedmen, and over sons who had violated thepietas towards their parents. Gradually, the judicial powers of the Prefect expanded, as the Prefect's office began to re-assume its old powers from thepraetor urbanus. Eventually there was no appeal from the Prefect's sentencing, except to that of theRoman Emperor, unlike the sentencing of other officials. Even thegovernors of theRoman provinces were subject to the Prefect's jurisdiction. The Prefect also possessed judicial powers over criminal matters. Originally these powers were exercised in conjunction with those of thequaestors, but by the 3rd century, they were exercised alone.

In late Antiquity, the office gained in effective power, as the imperial court was removed from the city, meaning that the prefects were no longer under the emperor's direct supervision. The office was usually held by leading members of Italy's senatorial aristocracy, who remained largelypagan even after EmperorConstantine the Great's conversion to Christianity. Over the following thirty years, Christian holders were few.[7] In such a capacity,Quintus Aurelius Symmachus played a prominent role in the controversy over theAltar of Victory in the late 4th century.

The urban prefecture survived thefall of the Western Roman Empire, and remained active under theOstrogothic Kingdom and well after theByzantine reconquest. The last mention of the Roman urban prefect occurs as late as 879.[7]

Constantinople

[edit]
See also:List of urban prefects of Constantinople

When the EmperorConstantine the Great (r. 306–337) namedConstantinople the capital of the Roman Empire, he also established aproconsul to oversee the city.[8] In the late 350s,Constantius II (r. 337–361) expanded the city'sSenate and set it as equal to that of Rome. Correspondingly, on 11 September or 11 December 359, Constantinople was also granted an urban prefect, commonly called in English theEparch from his Greek title (ὁ ἔπαρχος τῆς πόλεως,ho eparchos tēs poleōs).[8] The prefect was one of the emperor's chief lieutenants: like his Roman counterpart, the Constantinopolitan prefect was a member of the highest senatorial class, theillustres, and came immediately after thepraetorian prefects in the imperial hierarchy.[9] As such, the office possessed great prestige and extensive authority, and was one of the few high state offices which could not be occupied by aeunuch.[10] The prefect was also the formal head of the Senate, presiding over its meetings.[11] Hence, the prefect's nomination had to be formally ratified by the Senate, and unlike the other senior administrative positions of the state (praetorian prefects anddiocesan vicars) with their military connotations, the office's ancient and purely civilian origins were emphasized by the prefect's wearing of thetoga as a ceremonial garb.[4][12]

The prefect was solely responsible for the administration of the city of Constantinople and its immediate area. His tasks were manifold, ranging from the maintenance of order to the regulation and supervision of all guilds, corporations and public institutions. The city police, theταξιῶται (taxiōtai), came under the prefect's authority,[10] and the city jail was located at the basement of his official residence, thepraetorium, located before theForum of Constantine.[13] As with the Prefect of Rome, the night watch came under a subordinate prefect, theνυκτέπαρχος (nykteparchos, "night prefect").[4] In the 530s, however, some authority for the policing and regulation of the city passed to two new offices, created byJustinian I (r. 527–565). In 535 thepraitōr of thedemoi (πραίτωρ τῶν δήμων;praetor plebis in Latin), who commanded 20 soldiers and 30 firemen, was put in charge of policing and firefighting, while in 539, the office of thequaesitor (κοιαισίτωρ) was established and tasked with limiting the uncontrolled immigration to the city from the provinces, with supervising public mores, and with prosecuting sexual offenders and heretics.[10][14]

In the middle Byzantine period (7th–12th centuries), the prefect was regarded as the supreme judge in the capital, after the emperor himself.[15] His role in the economical life of the city was also of principal importance. The 10th-centuryBook of the Prefect stipulates the various rules for the various guilds that fell under the prefect's authority. The prefect was also responsible for the appointment of the teachers to theUniversity of Constantinople, and for the distribution of the grain dole to the city.[16] According to the late 9th-centuryKlētorologion, his two principal aides were thesymponos and thelogothetēs tou praitōriou. In addition, there were the heads (γειτονιάρχαι,geitoniarchai, the oldcuratores regionum) and judges (kritai) of the city's districts (Latinregiones, in Greekρεγεῶναι,regeōnai), theparathalassitēs (παραθαλασσίτης), an official responsible for the capital's seashore and ports, as well as their tolls, and several inspectors (epoptai), the heads of the guilds (exarchoi) and theboullōtai, whose function was to check and append the seal of the eparch on weights and scales as well as merchandise.[15][17]

The office continued until the early 13th century with its functions and authority relatively intact,[15] and may possibly have survived into theLatin Empire following the capture of the city in theFourth Crusade in 1204, being equated in Latin with thecastellanus of the city.[18] After the reconquest of the city by the Byzantines, however, the office of the Eparch was replaced throughout thePalaiologan period (1261–1453) by severalkephalatikeuontes (sing.kephalatikeuōn, κεφαλατικεύων, "headsman"), who each oversaw a district in the now much less populous capital.[15]

References

[edit]
  1. ^abLançon (2000), p. 45
  2. ^Marchese, M. E. (2007). "La Prefettura Urbana a Roma. un tentativo di localizzazione attraverso le iscrizioni".Mélanges de l'École française de Rome: Antiquité.119:613–634.doi:10.3406/mefr.2007.10407.
  3. ^Lançon (2000), pp. 21, 46
  4. ^abcBury (1923),Book I, Ch. 2, pp. 28–29
  5. ^Lançon (2000), pp. 46–47
  6. ^abLançon (2000), p. 46
  7. ^abKazhdan (1991), p. 2144
  8. ^abHeather & Moncur (2001), p. 45
  9. ^Notitia Dignitatum,Pars Orientalis, I.
  10. ^abcEvans (1996), p. 43
  11. ^Heather & Moncur (2001), pp. 225, 285, 292
  12. ^Heather & Moncur (2001), pp. 294–295
  13. ^Evans (1996), p. 25
  14. ^Bury (1911), p. 70
  15. ^abcdKazhdan (1991), p. 705
  16. ^Evans (1996), pp. 27, 32
  17. ^Bury (1911), pp. 70–73
  18. ^Van Tricht (2011), pp. 114–115

Bibliography

[edit]
‹ ThetemplateByzantine Empire topics is beingconsidered for merging. ›
Preceding
Early(330–717)
Middle(717–1204)
Late(1204–1453)
By modern region
or territory
Governance
Central
Early
Middle
Late
Provincial
Early
Middle
Late
Foreign relations
Military
Army
Early
Middle
Late
Navy
Conflicts
Religion and law
Religion
Law
Culture and society
Architecture
Constantinople
Thessalonica
Ravenna
Other locations
Art
Economy
Literature
Everyday life
Impact
Authority control databasesEdit this at Wikidata
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Praefectus_urbi&oldid=1293783374#Constantinople"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp