AfterRichard Cromwell,Lord Protector from 1658 to 1659, ceded power to theRump Parliament,Charles Fleetwood andJohn Lambert then dominated government for a year. On 20 October 1659,George Monck, the governor of Scotland under the Cromwells, marched south with his army from Scotland to oppose Fleetwood and Lambert. Lambert's army began to leave him, and he returned to London almost alone whilst Monck marched to London unopposed. The Presbyterian members, excluded inPride's Purge of 1648, were recalled, and on 24 December the army restored theLong Parliament.[1]
Fleetwood was deprived of his command and ordered to appear before Parliament to answer for his conduct. On 3 March 1660, Lambert was sent to theTower of London, from which he escaped a month later. He tried to rekindle the civil war in favour of theCommonwealth by issuing a proclamation calling on all supporters of the "Good Old Cause" to rally on the battlefield of Edgehill, but he was recaptured by ColonelRichard Ingoldsby, a participant in theregicide of Charles I who hoped to win a pardon by handing Lambert over to the new regime.[1] Lambert was incarcerated and died in custody in 1684; Ingoldsby was pardoned.[2]
The departure of Charles II from Scheveningen (1660)
On 4 April 1660,Charles II issued theDeclaration of Breda, in which he made several promises in relation to the reclamation of the crown of England. While he did this, Monck organised theConvention Parliament, which met for the first time on 25 April. On 8 May, it proclaimed that King Charles II had been the lawful monarch since theexecution of Charles I on 30 January 1649.[3] HistorianTimothy J. G. Harris would later argue that "Constitutionally, it was as if the last nineteen years had never happened."[4]
Charles returned from exile, leavingThe Hague on 23 May and landing atDover on 25 May.[5] He entered London on 29 May 1660, his 30th birthday. To celebrate his return to his Parliament, 29 May was made a public holiday, popularly known asOak Apple Day.[6] He was crowned at Westminster Abbey on 23 April 1661.[5]
Some contemporaries described the Restoration as "a divinely ordained miracle". The sudden and unexpected deliverance from political chaos was interpreted as a restoration of the natural and divine order.[7] TheCavalier Parliament convened for the first time on 8 May 1661, and it would endure for over 17 years, finally being dissolved on 24 January 1679. Like its predecessor, it was overwhelminglyRoyalist. It is also known as the Pensionary Parliament for the many pensions it granted to adherents of the King.[8]
The leading political figure at the beginning of the Restoration wasEdward Hyde, 1st Earl of Clarendon. It was the "skill and wisdom of Clarendon" which had "made the Restoration unconditional".[9]
Thomas Harrison, the first person found guilty of regicide during the Restoration
TheIndemnity and Oblivion Act, which became law on 29 August 1660, pardoned all past treason against the crown, but specifically excludedthose involved in the trial and execution of Charles I. Thirty-one of the59 commissioners (judges) who had signed the death warrant in 1649 were living. The regicides were hunted down; some escaped but most were found and put on trial. Three escaped to the American colonies.New Haven, Connecticut, secretly harboured Edward Whalley, William Goffe and John Dixwell, and after American independence named streets after them to honour them as forefathers of the American Revolution.[11]
In the ensuing trials, twelve were condemned to death. TheFifth MonarchistThomas Harrison, the first person found guilty of regicide, who had been the seventeenth of the 59 commissioners to sign the death warrant, was the first regicide to behanged, drawn and quartered because he was considered by the new government still to represent a real threat to the re-established order. In October 1660, atCharing Cross orTyburn, London, ten were publicly hanged, drawn and quartered: Thomas Harrison,John Jones,Adrian Scrope,John Carew,Thomas Scot, andGregory Clement, who had signed the king's death warrant; the preacherHugh Peters;Francis Hacker andDaniel Axtell, who commanded the guards at the king's trial and execution; andJohn Cooke, the solicitor who directed the prosecution. The 10 judges who were on the panel but did not sign the death warrant were also convicted.[12]
Oliver Cromwell,Henry Ireton, JudgeThomas Pride, and JudgeJohn Bradshaw were posthumouslyattainted for high treason. Because Parliament was (at the time) a court, abill of attainder is a legislative act declaring a person guilty of treason or felony, in contrast to the regular judicial process of trial and conviction. In January 1661, the corpses of Cromwell, Ireton and Bradshaw were exhumed and hanged in chains atTyburn.[13]
In 1661John Okey, one of the regicides who signed the death warrant of Charles I, was brought back from Holland along withMiles Corbet, friend and lawyer to Cromwell, andJohn Barkstead, former constable of theTower of London. They were all imprisoned in the Tower. From there they were taken to Tyburn and hanged, drawn and quartered on 19 April 1662. A further 19 regicides were imprisoned for life.
John Lambert was not in London for the trial of Charles I. At the Restoration, he was found guilty of high treason and remained in custody inGuernsey for the rest of his life.Henry Vane the Younger served on theCouncil of State during theInterregnum even though he refused to take the oath which expressed approbation (approval) of the King's execution. At the Restoration, after much debate in Parliament, he was exempted from the Indemnity and Oblivion Act. In 1662 he was tried for high treason, found guilty and beheaded onTower Hill on 14 June 1662.
Though regicide was widely condemned and many Regicides were executed or imprisoned after 1660, the revolutionary idea of conditional monarchy endured.[14] In political writings and the debates of the period, the notion that a king should rule in accordance with the will of the people or law became increasingly widespread.[15] Even Edward Hyde, Earl of Clarendon and Charles II’s chief advisor, acknowledged the need for a balanced constitutional arrangement in his efforts to secure a lasting postwar settlement.[15]
Of the eleven Protectoratebaronetcies, two had been previously granted by Charles I during the Civil War, but underCommonwealth legislation they were not recognised under the Protectorate (hence the Lord Protector's regranting of them). When that legislation passed into oblivion these two baronets were entitled to use the baronetcies granted by Charles I, and Charles II regranted four more. Only one now continues:Richard Thomas Willy, 14th baronet, is the direct successor of Griffith Williams. Of the remaining Protectorate baronets one,William Ellis, was granted a knighthood by Charles II.
Edmund Dunch was createdBaron Burnell of East Wittenham in April 1658, but this barony was not regranted. The male line failed in 1719 with the death of his grandson, alsoEdmund Dunch, so no one can lay claim to the title.
The one hereditaryviscountcy Cromwell created for certain,[a] (makingCharles Howard Viscount Howard of Morpeth and Baron Gilsland) continues to this day. In April 1661, Howard was createdEarl of Carlisle, Viscount Howard of Morpeth, and Baron Dacre of Gillesland. The present Earl is a direct descendant of this Cromwellian creation and Restoration recreation.
On 6 January 1661, about 50Fifth Monarchists, headed by a wine-cooper namedThomas Venner, tried to gain possession of London in the name of "King Jesus". Most were either killed or taken prisoner; on 19 and 21 January 1661, Venner and 10 others were hanged, drawn and quartered for hightreason.
"The commonwealth parliamentary union was, after 1660, treated as null and void".[17] As in England the republic was deemed constitutionally never to have occurred. The Convention Parliament was dissolved by Charles II in January 1661, and he summoned his first parliament in Ireland in May 1661. In 1662,29 May was made a public holiday known to this day as Oak Apple Day.[citation needed]
Charles was proclaimed King again on 14 May 1660. He was not crowned, having been previously crowned atScone in 1651. The Restoration "presented an occasion of universal celebration and rejoicing throughout Scotland".[18]
Charles II summoned his parliament on 1 January 1661, which began to undo all that been forced on his fatherCharles I of Scotland. TheRescissory Act 1661 made all legislation back to 1633 'void and null'.[19]
Barbados, as a haven for refugees fleeing theEnglish republic, had held for Charles II underLord Willoughby until defeated byGeorge Ayscue. When news reached Barbados of the King's restoration,Thomas Modyford declared Barbados for the King in July 1660.[20] The planters, however, were not eager for the return of the former governor Lord Willoughby, fearing disputes over titles, but the King ordered he be restored.[21]
Jamaica had been a conquest ofOliver Cromwell's and Charles II's claim to the island was therefore questionable. However, Charles II chose not to restore Jamaica toSpain and in 1661 it became a British colony and the planters would claim that they held rights as Englishmen by the King's assumption of the dominion of Jamaica.[22] The first governor wasLord Windsor. He was replaced in 1664 byThomas Modyford who had been ousted from Barbados.[23]
Maryland had resisted the republic until finally occupied by New England Puritans/Parliamentary forces after theBattle of the Severn in 1655. In 1660 the GovernorJosias Fendall tried to turn Maryland into a Commonwealth of its own in what is known asFendall's Rebellion but with the fall of the republic in England he was left without support and was replaced byPhilip Calvert upon the Restoration.[27]
In 1663 theProvince of Carolina was formed as a reward given tosome supporters of the Restoration. The province was named after the King's father,Charles I.[citation needed] The town ofCharleston was established in 1669 by a party of settlers from Bermuda (some being Bermudians aboard Bermudian vessels, others having passed through Bermuda from as far as England) under the same William Sayle who had led the Eleutheran Adventurers to the Bahamas. In 1670, Sayle became the first Colonial Governor of theProvince of Carolina.
The Somers Isles, aliasBermuda (originally namedVirgineola), was originally part of Virginia, and was administered by theSomers Isles Company, a spin-off of theVirginia Company, until 1684. The already existing contest between the mostly Parliamentarian Adventurers (shareholders) of the company in England and the Bermudians, who had their ownHouse of Assembly (and many of whom were becoming landowners as they were sold the land they had previously farmed as tenants as the profitability of the tobacco farmed exclusively for the company fell), placed the Bermudians on the side of the Crown despite the large number of Puritans in the colony.
Bermudians were attempting to shift their economy from tobacco to a maritime one and were being thwarted by the company, which relied on revenue from tobacco cultivation. Bermuda was the first colony to recognise Charles II as King in 1649. It controlled its own "army" (of militia) and deposed the Company appointed Governor, electing a replacement. Its Independent Puritans were forced to emigrate, settling the Bahamas under prominent Bermudian settler, sometime Governor of Bermuda, and Parliamentary loyalistWilliam Sayle as theEleutheran Adventurers. Although eventually reaching a compromise with the Commonwealth, the Bermudians dispute with the company continued and was finally taken before the restored Crown, which was keen for an opportunity to re-assert its authority over the wealthy businessmen who controlled the Somers Isles Company.
The islanders' protest to the Crown initially concerned the mis-treatment of Perient Trott and his heirs (includingNicholas Trott), but expanded to include the company's wider mismanagement of the colony. This led to a lengthy court case in which the Crown championed Bermudians against the company, and resulted in the company's Royal Charter being revoked in 1684. From that point onwards the Crown assumed responsibility for appointing the Colony's governors (it first re-appointed the last company governor). Freed of the company's restraints, the emerging local merchant class came to dominate and shape Bermuda's progress, as Bermudians abandoned agriculture en masse and turned to seafaring.
The Restoration and Charles' coronation mark a reversal of the stringent Puritan morality, "as though the pendulum [of England's morality] swung from repression to licence more or less overnight".[29] Theatres reopened after having been closed during the protectorship, Puritanism lost its momentum, and bawdy comedy became a recognisable genre. In addition, women were allowed to perform on the commercial stage as professional actresses for the first time. In Scotland, the bishops returned as theEpiscopacy was reinstated.
To celebrate the occasion and cement their diplomatic relations, the Dutch Republic presented Charles with theDutch Gift, a fine collection of old master paintings, classical sculptures, furniture, and a yacht.
The return of the king and his court from exile led to the replacement of the Puritan severity of the Cromwellian style with a taste for magnificence and opulence and to the introduction of Dutch and French artistic influences. These are evident in furniture in the use of floralmarquetry,walnut instead of oak, twisted turned supports and legs, exoticveneers, cane seats and backs on chairs, sumptuoustapestry andvelvetupholstery and ornate carved and gilded scrolling bases for cabinets.[31] Similar shifts appear in prose style.[32]
Comedy, especially bawdy comedy, flourished, and a favourite setting was the bed-chamber.[33] Indeed, sexually explicit language was encouraged by the king personally and by the rakish style of his court. HistorianGeorge Norman Clark argues:
The best-known fact about the Restoration drama is that it is immoral. The dramatists did not criticize the accepted morality about gambling, drink, love, and pleasure generally, or try, like the dramatists of our own time, to work out their own view of character and conduct. What they did was, according to their respective inclinations, to mock at all restraints. Some were gross, others delicately improper....The dramatists did not merely say anything they liked: they also intended to glory in it and to shock those who did not like it.[34]
The socially diverse audiences included both aristocrats, their servants and hangers-on, and a substantial middle-class segment.[35] These playgoers were attracted to the comedies by up-to-the-minute topical writing, by crowded and bustling plots, by the introduction of the first professional actresses, and by the rise of the first celebrity actors. This period saw the first professional female playwright,Aphra Behn.[36]
TheRestoration spectacular, or elaborately stagedmachine play, hit the London public stage in the late 17th-century Restoration period, enthralling audiences with action, music, dance, moveable scenery,baroque illusionistic painting, gorgeous costumes, and special effects such as trapdoor tricks, "flying" actors, and fireworks. These shows have always had a bad reputation as a vulgar and commercial threat to the witty, "legitimate" Restoration drama; however, they drew Londoners in unprecedented numbers and left them dazzled and delighted.[37]
Basically home-grown and with roots in the early 17th-century courtmasque, though never ashamed of borrowing ideas and stage technology fromFrench opera, the spectaculars are sometimes called "English opera". However, the variety of them is so untidy that most theatre historians despair of defining them as a genre at all.[38] Only a handful of works of this period are usually accorded the term "opera", as the musical dimension of most of them is subordinate to the visual. It was spectacle and scenery that drew in the crowds, as shown by many comments in the diary of the theatre-loverSamuel Pepys.[39]
The expense of mounting ever more elaborate scenic productions drove the two competing theatre companies into a dangerous spiral of huge expenditure and correspondingly huge losses or profits. A fiasco such asJohn Dryden'sAlbion and Albanius would leave a company in serious debt, while blockbusters likeThomas Shadwell'sPsyche or Dryden'sKing Arthur would put it comfortably in the black for a long time.[40]
The Restoration was ended by the Glorious Revolution, which overthrew King James II of England, propelled by a union of English Parliamentarians with the Dutch stadtholderWilliam III of Orange-Nassau (William of Orange). William's successful invasion of England with a Dutch fleet and army led to his accession to the English throne as William III of England jointly with his wife Mary II of England, James's daughter.[41]
In April 1688, James reissued theDeclaration of Indulgence and ordered all Anglican clergymen to read it to their congregations. When seven bishops, including the Archbishop of Canterbury, submitted a petition requesting the reconsideration of the King's religious policies, they were arrested and tried for seditious libel. On 30 June 1688, a group of seven Protestant nobles invited thePrince of Orange to come to England with an army. By September it became clear that William would invade England.[42]
When William arrived on 5 November 1688, James lost his nerve, declined to attack the invading Dutch and tried to flee to France. He was captured in Kent. Later, he was released and placed under Dutch protective guard. Having no desire to make James a martyr, William, Prince of Orange, let him escape on 23 December. James was received in France by his cousin and ally,Louis XIV, who offered him a palace and a pension.[42]
William convened aConvention Parliament to decide how to handle the situation. While the Parliament refused to depose James, they declared that James, having fled to France had effectively abdicated the throne, and that the throne was vacant. To fill this vacancy, James's daughter Mary was declared Queen; she was to rule jointly with her husband William, Prince of Orange, who would be king. The English Parliament passed theBill of Rights 1689 that denounced James for abusing his power.[43]
The abuses charged to James included the suspension of theTest Acts after having sworn as king to uphold the supremacy of the Church of England,[44] the prosecution of theSeven Bishops for merely petitioning the crown, the establishment of astanding army, and the imposition of cruel punishments. The bill also declared that henceforth no Roman Catholic was permitted to ascend the English throne, nor could any English monarch marry a Roman Catholic.[43]
^Sutherland, James Runcieman (1969).Restoration Literature, 1660–1700: Dryden, Bunyan, and Pepys. Clarendon Press.
^Arakelin, Paul G. (1979). "The Myth of a Restoration Style Shift".The Eighteenth Century.20 (3):227–245.JSTOR41467197.
^Egan, James (1999). "'For mine own private satisfaction': Marvell's aesthetic signatures in the rehearsal Transpros'd".Prose Studies.22 (3):17–40.doi:10.1080/01440359908586683.
^Webster, Jeremy W. (2012). "In and Out of the Bed-chamber: Staging Libertine Desire in Restoration Comedy".Journal for Early Modern Cultural Studie.12 (2):77–96.doi:10.1353/jem.2012.0016.
^Clark, George (1956).The Later Stuarts, 1660–1714. p. 369.
^Love, Harold (1986). "Who Were the Restoration Audience?".The Yearbook of English Studies.10:21–40.doi:10.2307/3506932.JSTOR3506932.
^Bakewell, Lyndsey (2016).Changing scenes and flying machines: re-examination of spectacle and the spectacular in Restoration theatre, 1660–1714 (PhD. Diss. Loughborough University thesis).S2CID193368353.
^Hume, Robert D. (1976).The Development of English Drama in the Late Seventeenth Century. p. 205.
Middleton, Richard (2002).Colonial America: a history, 1565-1776 (3rd ed.). Blackwell. pp. 111–112.
Monteith, Kathleen; Richards, Glen, eds. (2001).Jamaica in Slavery and Freedom: History, Heritage and Culture. University of the West Indies Press. pp. 36–39.
CEE staff (2007)."Restoration".The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia (6th ed.). Columbia University Press. Archived fromthe original on 25 September 2012. Retrieved15 April 2012.
Hutton, Ronald (2000).The British Republic 1649–1660 (2nd ed.). Macmillan. p. 121.
Keeble, N. H. (2002).The Restoration: England in the 1660s. History of Early Modern England Series. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.ISBN978-0-631-23617-7.
Lockyer, Roger (2004).Tudor and Stuart Britain: 1485–1714 (3rd ed.). Pearson/Longman.ISBN978-0582771888.