New Crowns for Old: Disraeli and Victoria in a cartoon mimicking a scene inAladdin where lamps are exchanged. She made himEarl of Beaconsfield at this time.[4]
The idea of having Queen Victoria proclaimed Empress of India was not particularly new, asLord Ellenborough had already suggested it in 1843 upon becoming thegovernor-general of India. By 1874,Major-GeneralSir Henry Ponsonby, the Queen's private secretary, had ordered English charters to be scrutinised for imperial titles, withEdgar andStephen mentioned as sound precedents. The Queen, possibly irritated by the sallies of the republicans, the tendency to democracy, and the realisation that her influence was manifestly on the decline, was urging the move.[6] Another factor may have been that the Queen's first child,Victoria, was married toFrederick, the heir apparent to theGerman Empire. Upon becoming empress, she would outrank her mother.[7] By January 1876, the Queen's insistence was so great that Benjamin Disraeli felt that he could procrastinate no longer.[6] Initially, Victoria had considered the style "Empress of Great Britain, Ireland, and India", but Disraeli had persuaded the Queen to limit the title to India in order to avoid controversy.[8] Hence, the titleKaisar-i-Hind was coined in 1876 by the orientalistG.W. Leitner as the official imperial title for the British monarch in India.[9] The termKaisar-i-Hind means emperor of India in the vernacular of the Hindi and Urdu languages. The wordkaisar, meaning 'emperor', is a derivative of the Roman imperial titlecaesar (viaPersian andOttoman Turkish – seeKaiser-i-Rum), and is cognate with the German titleKaiser, which was borrowed from the Latin at an earlier date.[10]
Many in the United Kingdom, however, regarded the assumption of the title as an obvious development from theGovernment of India Act 1858, which resulted in the founding of British India, ruled directly bythe Crown. The public were of the opinion that the title of "queen" was no longer adequate for the ceremonial ruler of what was often referred to informally as the "Indian Empire". The new styling underlined the fact that the native states were no longer a mere agglomeration but a collective entity.[11]
George V's signature with the initialsR I (Rex Imperator)A Canadian 1-cent coin with the inscriptionInd. Imp. (Indiae Imperator)'
WhenEdward VII ascended to the throne on 22 January 1901, he continued the imperial tradition laid down by his mother, Queen Victoria, by adopting the title Emperor of India. Three subsequent British monarchs followed in his footsteps, and the title continued to be used after India and Pakistan had become independent on 15 August 1947. It was not until 22 June 1948 that the style was officially abolished.[2]
The first emperor to visit India wasGeorge V. For his imperial coronation ceremony at theDelhi Durbar, theImperial Crown of India was created. The Crown weighs 920 g (2.03 lb) and is set with 6,170 diamonds, 9 emeralds, 4 rubies, and 4 sapphires. At the front is a very fine emerald weighing 32 carats (6.4 g).[12] The King wrote in his diary that it was heavy and uncomfortable to wear: "Rather tired after wearing my crown for3+1⁄2 hours; it hurt my head, as it is pretty heavy."[13]
The title "Emperor of India" did not disappear when British India became theUnion of India (1947–1950) andDominion of Pakistan (1947–1952) after independence in 1947. George VI retained the title until 22 June 1948, the date of a Royal Proclamation[14] made in accordance with Section 7 (2) of theIndian Independence Act 1947, reading: "The assent of the Parliament of the United Kingdom is hereby given to the omission from the Royal Style and Titles of the wordsIndiae Imperator and the words "Emperor of India" and to the issue by His Majesty for that purpose of His Royal Proclamation under the Great Seal of the Realm."[15] Thereafter, George VI remained monarch of Pakistan until his death in 1952, and of India until it became theRepublic of India on 26 January 1950.
British coins, as well as those of theEmpire and theCommonwealth, had routinely included the abbreviated titleInd. Imp. Coins in India, on the other hand, had the wordempress, and laterking-emperor in English. The title appeared on coinage in the United Kingdom throughout 1948, with a further Royal Proclamation made on 22 December under theCoinage Act 1870 to omit the abbreviated title.[16]
^"No. 38330".The London Gazette. 22 June 1948. p. 3647. Royal Proclamation of 22 June 1948, made in accordance with theIndian Independence Act 1947, 10 & 11 GEO. 6. CH. 30. ('Section 7: ...(2)The assent of the Parliament of the United Kingdom is hereby given to the omission from the Royal Style and Titles of the words " Indiae Imperator " and the words " Emperor of India " and to the issue by His Majesty for that purpose of His Royal Proclamation under the Great Seal of the Realm.'). According to this Royal Proclamation, the King retained thestyle and titles 'George VI by the Grace of God, of Great Britain, Ireland and the British Dominions beyond the Seas King, Defender of the Faith'