Elizabeth premiered at the55th Venice International Film Festival on 8 September 1998 and was theatrically released byPolyGram Filmed Entertainment in the United Kingdom on 23 October. The film became a critical and commercial success. Reviewers praised Kapur's direction, costume design, production values and most notably Blanchett's titular performance, bringing her to international recognition, while the film grossed $82 million against its $30 million budget.
As briefed by her adviser,Sir William Cecil, Elizabeth inherits a distressed England besieged by debts, crumbling infrastructure, hostile neighbours, and treasonous nobles within her administration, chief among them,Thomas Howard, 4th Duke of Norfolk. Cecil tells Elizabeth that she must marry, produce anheir, and secure her rule. Unimpressed with hersuitors, Elizabeth delays her decision and continues her affair withLord Robert Dudley, her childhood friend. Cecil appointsFrancis Walsingham, aProtestantexile returned from France, to act as Elizabeth's bodyguard and adviser.
Mary of Guise, acting asregent for her young daughter,Mary, Queen of Scots, brings an additional 4,000 French troops to neighbouringScotland. Unfamiliar with military strategy and browbeaten by Norfolk at the war council, Elizabeth orders a military response, which proves disastrous when the professional French soldiers defeat the inexperienced, ill-trained English forces. Walsingham tells Elizabeth that Catholic lords and priests intentionally deprived Elizabeth's army of proper soldiers and used their defeat to argue for Elizabeth's removal. Realising the depth of the conspiracy against her and her dwindling options, Elizabeth accepts Mary of Guise's conditions to consider marrying her nephewHenry, Duke of Anjou.
To stabilise her rule and heal England's religious divisions, Elizabeth proposes theAct of Uniformity, which unites English Christians under theChurch of England and severs their connection to theVatican. In response to the Act's passage, the Vatican sends apriest to England to aid Norfolk and his cohorts in their growing plot to overthrow Elizabeth. Unaware of the plot, Elizabeth meets Henry of France but ignores his advances in favour of Lord Robert. William Cecil confronts Elizabeth over her indecisiveness about marrying and reveals that Lord Dudley is married. Elizabeth rejects Henry's marriage proposal when she discovers he is across-dresser and confronts Lord Dudley about his secret, fracturing their affair and banishing him from her private rooms.
Elizabeth survives an assassination attempt, evidence implicating Mary of Guise. Elizabeth sends Walsingham to meet with Mary secretly in Scotland, under the pretence of once again planning to marry Henry. Instead, Walsingham assassinates Guise, inciting French enmity against Elizabeth. When William Cecil asks her to solidify relations with the Spanish, Elizabeth dismisses him from her service, choosing instead to follow her own counsel.
Walsingham warns of another plot to kill Elizabeth spearheaded by the Catholic priest carrying letters of conspiracy. Under Elizabeth's orders, he apprehends the priest, who divulges the names of the conspirators and a Vatican agreement to elevate Norfolk to the English crown if he weds Mary, Queen of Scots. Walsingham arrests Norfolk and executes him and every conspirator except Lord Robert. Elizabeth grants Lord Robert his life as a reminder to herself how close she came to danger.
Drawing inspiration from the divine, Elizabeth models her appearance after theVirgin Mary. Proclaiming herself to be married to England, she ascends the throne as the "Virgin Queen."
Principal photography began on 2 September 1997 and completed on 2 December 1997[3]
Kapur's original choice for the role wasEmily Watson, but she turned it down.[4] Cate Blanchett was chosen to play Elizabeth after Kapur saw a trailer ofOscar and Lucinda.[5]According to the director's commentary, Kapur mentioned that the role of the Pope (played by Sir John Gielgud) was originally offered to, and accepted by,Marlon Brando. However, plans changed when Kapur noted that many on set would probably be concerned that Brando would be sharing the set with them for two days.
A large proportion of the indoor filming, representing the royal palace, was conducted in various corners ofDurham Cathedral; its unique lozenge-carved nave pillars are clearly identifiable.[6][7]
Elizabeth premiered in September 1998 at theVenice Film Festival; it was also shown at theToronto International Film Festival.[8] It premiered in London on 2 October 1998 and it premiered in the United States on 13 October 1998.[8] It opened in the United Kingdom on 23 October 1998[8] and opened inlimited release in the United States in nine cinemas on 6 November 1998, grossing $275,131.[9] Its widest release in the United States and Canada was in 624 cinemas,[9] and its largest weekend gross throughout its run in cinemas in the US and Canada was $3.8 million in 516 cinemas,[9] ranking No.9 at the box office.[10]Elizabeth went on to gross $30 million in the United States and Canada, and a total of $82 million worldwide.[11]
The film was well received by critics. It holds an approval rating of 84% on thereview aggregator websiteRotten Tomatoes based on 67 reviews, with anaverage score of 7.40/10. The site's consensus reads: "No mere historical drama,Elizabeth is a rich, suspenseful journey into the heart of British Royal politics, and features a typically outstanding performance from Cate Blanchett."[12]Metacritic reports a score of 75 out of 100 based on 30 critics, indicating "generally favorable reviews".[13]
Elizabeth received some criticism for factual liberties it takes and for its distortion of the historical timeline to present events that occurred in the middle to later part of Elizabeth's reign as occurring at the beginning.[14][15] In his entry for Elizabeth I in theOxford Dictionary of National Biography,Patrick Collinson described the film "as if the known facts of the reign, plus many hitherto unknown, were shaken up like pieces of a jigsaw and scattered on the table at random."[15][16] Carole Levin, reviewing the film in 1999 forPerspectives on History, criticised the movie for portraying Elizabeth as "a very weak and flighty character who often showed terrible judgment", in contrast to historical descriptions of her as a strong, decisive, and intelligent ruler. In particular, Levin described the movie's portrayal of Elizabeth as dependent on Walsingham, in addition to the completely inaccurate portrayal of her relationship with Robert Dudley; such instances in the film make her character appear weak and overpowered by the men around her.[14]
TheCatholic League for Religious and Civil Rights accused the film ofanti-Catholicism, stating that the film gives the "impression that the religious strife was all the doing of the Catholic Church", noting that the review inThe New York Times considered it "resolutely anti-Catholic" complete with a "scheming pope" and repeating the charge made in theBuffalo News that "every single Catholic in the film is dark, cruel and devious."[17]
^abEric Josef Carlson (2007). "Teaching and Technology: Teaching Elizabeth Tudor with Movies: Film, Historical Thinking, and the Classroom".The Sixteenth Century Journal.38 (2):419–428.doi:10.2307/20478367.JSTOR20478367.
^Patrick Collinson. "Elizabeth I (1553–1603)". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. p. 76.