Possible Mesopotamia–Egypt trade routes from the 4th millennium BCE.[1][2]
Egypt–Mesopotamia relations were the relations between the civilizations ofancient Egypt andMesopotamia, in theMiddle East. They seem to have developed from the 4th millennium BCE, starting in theUruk period for Mesopotamia (circa 4000–3100 BCE) and the half a millennium youngerGerzean culture ofPrehistoric Egypt (circa 3500–3200 BCE), and constituted a largely one way body of influences from Mesopotamia into Egypt.[3][4]
Prior to a specific Mesopotamian influence there had already been a longstanding influence fromWest Asia into Egypt,North Africa and even into some parts of theHorn of Africa and theSahel in the form of theNeolithic Revolution which from circa 9000 BCE diffused advanced agricultural practices and technology, gene-flow, certain domesticated animals and crops and the likely spread ofProto-Afroasiatic language into the region, withSemitic languages that had evolved in West Asia circa 4000 BCE being introduced via the Arabian Peninsula and Levant into the Horn of Africa and North Africa respectively after 1000 BCE.
Mesopotamian influences can be seen in the visual arts of Egypt, in architecture, in technology, weaponry, in imported products, religious imagery, economic practices, in agriculture and livestock, in genetic input, and also in the likely transfer ofwriting from Mesopotamia to Egypt[4] and generated "deep-seated" parallels in the early stages of both cultures. A similar Mesopotamian influence during this period is seen inElam inAncient Iran, theLevant,Anatolia and northern parts of theArabian Peninsula.[2]
Influences on Egyptian trade and art (3500–3200 BCE)
Mesopotamian king asMaster of Animals on the top of the handle. This work of art both shows the influence of Mesopotamia onEgypt at an early date, in an example of ancient Egypt–Mesopotamia relations, and the state of Mesopotamian royal iconography during theUruk period.[5][6][7]
Similar portrait of an Uruk King-Priest with a brimmed round hat and large beard, bare-chested with a straight skirt. Uruk, 3300-3000 BC.[8][9]
There was generally a high-level of trade betweenAncient Egypt and theNear East throughout thePre-dynastic period of Egypt, during theNaqada II (3600–3350 BCE) andNaqada III (3350–2950 BCE) phases.[7] These were contemporary with theLate Uruk (3600–3100 BCE) andJemdet Nasr (3100–2900 BCE) periods inMesopotamia.[7] The main period of cultural influence, particularly consisting in the transfer of Mesopotamian imagery, symbols and technology to Egypt, is considered to have lasted about 250 years, during theNaqada II toDynasty I periods.[10]
Distinctly foreign objects and art forms entered Egypt during this period, indicating contacts with several parts ofWestern Asia. The designs that were emulated by Egyptian artists are numerous: theUruk "Priest-King" with his tunic and brimmed hat in the posture of theMaster of animals, theserpopards, wingedgriffins, snakes around rosettes, boats with high prows, all characteristic of long established Mesopotamian art of theLate Uruk (Uruk IV, c. 3350–3200 BCE) period.[11][12] The same "Priest-King" is visible in several older Mesopotamian works of art of the end of the Uruk period, such as theBlau Monuments, cylinder seals and statues.[13] Objects such as theGebel el-Arak knife handle, which has patently Mesopotamian relief carvings on it, have been found in Egypt,[3] and the silver which appears in this period can only have been obtained fromAsia Minor.[14]
Evolution of Egyptian prehistoric pottery styles, from Naqada I to Naqada II and Naqada III, with Mesopotamian-style Naqada II straight-spouted jars circa 3500 BCE.[15]
Red-slipped spouted pottery items dating to around 3500 BCE (Naqada II C/D), which were probably used for pouring water, beer or wine, suggest that Egypt was in contact with and being influenced by Mesopotamia around that time.[15] This type of pottery was manufactured in Egypt, with Egyptian clay, but its shape, particularly the spout, is certainly Mesopotamian in origin.[15] Such vessels were new and rare in pre-Dynastic Egypt, but had been commonly manufactured in the Mesopotamian cities ofNippur andUruk for centuries.[15] This indicated that Egyptians were familiar with Mesopotamian types of pottery.[15]The discovery of these vessels initially encouraged the development of thedynastic race theory, according to which Mesopotamians would have established the first Pharaonic line, but is now considered by many scholars to be simply indicative of cultural influence and borrowings circa 3500 BCE, although there is an established gene flow from Mesopotamia and West Asia into Egypt .[15]
Spouted jars of Mesopotamian design start to appear in Egypt in theNaqada II period.[7] Various Uruk pottery vases and containers have been found in Egypt in Naqada contexts, confirming that Mesopotamian finished goods were imported into Egypt, although the past contents of the jars have not been determined yet.[16] Scientific analysis of ancient wine jars in Abydos has shown there was some high-volume wine trade with theLevant and Mesopotamia during this period.[17]
Egyptians used traditional disk-shapedmaceheads during the early phase ofNaqada culture, circa 4000–3400 BCE. At the end of the period, the disk-shaped macehead was replaced by the militarily superior Mesopotamian-style pear-shaped macehead as seen on theNarmer Palette.[18] The Mesopotamian macehead was much heavier with a wider impact surface, and was capable of giving much more damaging blows than the original Egyptian disk-shaped macehead.[18]
Egyptian cylinder seal First or Second Dynasty, 3100–2686 BCE
It is generally thought thatcylinder seals were introduced from Mesopotamia to Egypt during theNaqada II period.[19][20] Cylinder seals, some coming from Mesopotamia and alsoElam inAncient Iran, and some made locally in Egypt copying earlier Mesopotamian and Elamite designs in a stylized manner, have been discovered in the tombs ofUpper Egypt dating to Naqada II and III, particularly inHierakonpolis.[7][10] Mesopotamian cylinder seals have been found in theGerzean context of Naqada II, inNaqada andHiw, attesting to the expansion of the MesopotamianJemdet Nasr culture as far as Egypt at the end of the 4th millennium BCE.[21][19]
In Egypt, cylinder seals suddenly appear without any local antecedents from around Naqada II c-d (3500–3300 BCE).[22] The designs are similar to and clearly inspired by those of Mesopotamia, where they were invented during the early 4th millennium BCE, during theUruk period, as an evolutionary step from variousaccounting systems and seals going back as early as the early 7th millennium BCE in Mesopotamia.[22] The earliest Egyptian cylinder seals are clearly similar to earlier and contemporaryUruk seals down to Naqada II-d (circa 3300 BCE), and may even have been manufactured by Mesopotamian craftsmen and subsequently sold to the Egyptians, but they start to diverge from circa 3300 BCE to become more Egyptian in character.[22]
Lapis lazuli was imported in great quantity by Egypt, and already used in many tombs of theNaqada II period. Lapis lazuli probably originated in what is today northernAfghanistan, as no other sources are known, and had to be transported across theIranian plateau toMesopotamia as part of the established Mesopotamian trade network with South and Central Asia, and from there sold on to Egypt by the Mesopotamians.[23][16]
In addition, Egyptian objects were created which clearly mimic Mesopotamian forms, although not slavishly.[24] Cylinder seals appear in Egypt, as well as recessed paneling architecture, the Egyptian reliefs on cosmetic palettes are clearly made in the same style as the earlier and contemporary MesopotamianUruk culture, and the ceremonial mace heads which turn up from the lateGerzean and earlySemainean are crafted in the Mesopotamian "pear-shaped" style, instead of the Egyptian native style.[25] The first man/animal composite creatures in Egypt were directly copied from earlier Mesopotamian designs.[26] It is also considered as certain that the Egyptians adopted from Mesopotamia the practice of marking the sealing of jars with engraved cylinder seals for informational purposes.[27]
Recessed niches in particular, which are characteristic of Mesopotamian temple architecture, were adopted for the design offalse doors in thetombs of theFirst Dynasty andSecond Dynasty, from the time of theNaqada III period (circa 3000 BCE).[29][30] It is unknown if the transfer of this design was the result of Mesopotamian builders and architects in Egypt, or if temple designs on imported Mesopotamian seals may have been a sufficient source of inspiration for Egyptian architects to manage themselves.[29]
The design of theziggurat, which appeared in Mesopotamia in the late 5th millennium BCE, was clearly a precursor to and an influence on theEgyptian pyramids, especially the stepped designs of the oldest pyramids (step pyramid), the earliest of which (Pyramid of Zoser atSaqqara) dates to circa 2600 BCE, well over two thousand years younger than Mesopotamian ziggurats/step pyramids.[31] This again strongly suggests early cultural and technological influence on Egypt by Mesopotamia.[31]
Ziggurats and Egyptian pyramids
The original Mesopotamian Anuziggurat dates to around 4000 BCE
ThePyramid of Djoser, the first Egyptian pyramid, dates circa 2670–2650 BCE
The original pyramidal structure, the Mesopotamian "AnuZiggurat" dates to around 4000 BCE, and the White Temple was built on top of it circa 3500 BCE.[32] The design of the ziggurat was probably a precursor to that of theEgyptian pyramids, the earliest of which dates to circa 2600 BCE.[31]
The route of this trade is difficult to determine, but direct Egyptian contact withCanaan in the Levant does not predate the early dynastic era, so it is usually assumed to have been by sea trade.[1] During the time when thedynastic race theory was still popular, it was proposed that Mesopotamian sailors circumnavigatedArabia, but aMediterranean route, probably by middlemen through the Canaanite port ofByblos, is also likely, as evidenced by the presence of CanaaniteByblian objects in Egypt.[1]Glyptic art also seems to have played a key role, through the circulation of decorated cylinder seals across theLevant, a commonhinterland of both empires, particularly Mesopotamia.[33]
The intensity of the exchanges suggest however that the contacts between Egypt and Mesopotamia were often direct, rather than merely through middlemen or through trade.[2] Uruk had known colonial outposts of as far asHabuba Kabira, in modernSyria, insuring their presence in the Levant.[34] Numerous Uruk cylinder seals have also been uncovered there.[34] There have been suggestions that Uruk may have had a colonial outpost and a form ofcolonial presence in northern Egypt.[34] The site ofButo in particular was suggested, but it has been rejected as a possible candidate.[29]
The fact that so many Gerzean sites are at the mouths ofwadis which lead to theRed Sea may indicate some amount of trade via the Red Sea (thoughByblian trade potentially could have crossed the Sinai and then be taken to the Red Sea).[35] Also, it is considered unlikely that something as complicated as recessed panel architecture could have worked its way into Egypt by proxy, and a possibly significant contingent of Mesopotamian migrants or settlers is often suspected.[1]
These early contacts probably acted as a sort of catalyst for the development of Egyptian culture, particularly in respect to the inception of writing, the codification of royal and vernacular imagery and architectural innovations.[2]
These imports from Mesopotamia appear to have been quite intensive during the lateGerzean period (lateNaqada II), and correspond to the Protoliterate b and c cultures of Mesopotamia.[36] "Naqada" literally means "Golden City", and the city was at the center of the developing trade of gold from the eastern desert of Egypt.[37] This may have stimulated the direct involvement of Mesopotamian traders, who, accompanied by artists and various skilled personnel, may have introduced Mesopotamian styles and practices.[37] The exploitation of gold may also have stimulated the development of the first organized proto-state structures in Egypt.[37]
Egyptian palettes, such as theNarmer Palette (3200–3000 BCE), borrow elements of Mesopotamian iconography, in particular thesauropod design ofUruk.[38]
Beads of lapis lazuli and travertine, circa 3650–3100 BCE. Naqada II–Naqada III.
Egyptian necklace and pendant, using lapis lazuli imported from Afghanistan, possibly by Mesopotamian traders,Naqada II circa 3500 BCE, British Museum EA57765 EA57586.[39][40][41]
While there is clear evidence theNaqada II culture borrowed abundantly from Mesopotamia, there is also a commonly held view that many of the achievements of the laterFirst Dynasty were also the result of a long period of indigenous cultural and political development.[43] Such developments are much older than the Naqada II period,[44] the Naqada II period had a large degree of continuity with the Naqada I period,[45] and the changes which did happen during the Naqada periods happened over significant amounts of time.[46]
Although there are many examples of Mesopotamian influence in Egypt in the 4th millennium BCE, the reverse is not true, and there are no traces of Egyptian influence in Mesopotamia at any time, clearly indicating a one way flow of ideas.[47] Only very few EgyptianNaqada period object have been found beyond Egypt, and generally in its vicinity, such as a rareNaqada III Egyptiancosmetic palette in the shape of a fish, of the end of 4th millennium BCE, found inAshkelon orGaza.[48]
Early Egyptologists such asFlinders Petrie were proponents of theDynastic race theory which hypothesised that the first Egyptian chieftains and rulers were themselves of Mesopotamian origin,[49] but this view has been abandoned among modern scholars.[50][51]
The current position of modern scholarship is that the Egyptian civilization was an indigenous Nile Valley development and that the archaeological evidence "strongly supports anAfrican origin"[52] of the ancient Egyptians.[50][53][54][55]
It is generally thought thatEgyptian hieroglyphs "came into existence a century or so afterSumerian script, and were probably invented under the influence of the latter",[59] and that it is "probable that the general idea of expressing words of a language in writing was brought to Egypt from SumerianMesopotamia".[60][61] The two writing systems are in fact quite similar in their initial stages, relying heavily on pictographic forms and then evolving a parallel system for the expression of phonetic sounds.[2]
Standard reconstructions of thedevelopment of writing generally place the development of the Sumerianproto-cuneiform script before the development of Egyptian hieroglyphs, with the strong suggestion the former influenced the latter.[56]
There is however a lack of direct evidence that Mesopotamian writing influenced Egyptian form, and "no definitive determination has been made as to the origin of hieroglyphics in ancient Egypt".[62] Some scholars point out that "a very credible argument can also be made for the independent development of writing in Egypt..."[63] Since the 1990s, the discovery of glyphs on clay tags atAbydos, dated to between 3400 and 3200 BCE, may challenge the classical notion according to which the Mesopotamian symbol system predates the Egyptian one,[64][65][66] although perhaps tellingly, Egyptian writing does make a 'sudden' appearance at that time with no antecedents or precursors, while on the contrary Mesopotamia already had a long evolutionary history of sign usage in tokens dating back to circa 8000 BCE, followed by Proto-Cuneiform.[67][17] Pittman proposes that the Abydos clay tags are almost identical to contemporary clay tags fromUruk,Mesopotamia.[68]
Egyptian scholar Gamal Mokhtar argued that the inventory of hieroglyphic symbols derived from "fauna and flora used in the signs [which] are essentially African" and in "regards to writing, we have seen that a purely Nilotic, hence African origin not only is not excluded, but probably reflects the reality" although he acknowledged the geographical location of Egypt made it a receptacle for many influences.[69] According toFrank Yurco, "Egyptian writing arose in NaqadanUpper Egypt andA-Group Nubia, and not in the Delta cultures, where the directWestern Asian contact was made, further vitiates the Mesopotamian-influence argument".[70]
Tablet with Mesopotamianproto-cuneiform pictographic characters (end of 4th millennium BCE),Uruk III.
Mesopotamian pierced label, with symbol "EN" meaning "Master", the reverse of the plaque has the symbol for GoddessInanna. Uruk circa 3000 BCE. Louvre Museum AO 7702
Designs on some of the labels or token fromAbydos,Egypt, carbon-dated to circa 3400–3200 BCE.[17][67] They are virtually identical with contemporary clay tags fromUruk,Mesopotamia.[71]
Labels with some of the earliestEgyptian hieroglyphs from the tomb of Egyptian kingMenes (3200–3000 BCE)
Narmer Palette (circa 3000 BCE). The Egyptian symbol of the king smiting his enemies with a mace was adopted centuries later by the dynasts of Mesopotamia.[72]
After this early period of exchange, and the direct introduction of Mesopotamian components into Egyptian culture, Egypt soon started to assert its own style from theEarly Dynastic Period (3150–2686 BCE), theNarmer palette being seen as a turning point.[73]
Egypt seems to have provided some artistic feedback to Mesopotamia at the time of theEarly Dynastic Period of Mesopotamia (2900–2334 BCE).[72] This is especially the case with royal iconography: the figure of the king smiting his enemies with a mace, and the depiction of dead enemies being eaten by birds of prey appeared in Egypt from the time of theNarmer palette, and were then adopted centuries later (possibly from Egypt) by Mesopotamian rulersEannatum andSargon of Akkad.[72] This depiction appears to be part of an artistic system to promote "hegemonistic kingship".[72] Another example is the usage of decorated mace heads as a symbol of kingship.[72]
There is also a possibility that the depictions of the Mesopotamian king with a muscular, naked, upper body fighting his enemies in a quadrangular posture, as seen in theStele of Naram-Sin or statues ofGudea (all circa 2000 BCE) were derived from Egyptian sculpture, which by that time had already been through its Golden Age during theOld Kingdom.[74]
Facial reconstruction and depiction created from the Nuwayrat individual skull.[75]
For the first time in 2025, a study was able to give insights into the genetic background of Early Dynastic Egyptians, by sequencing the whole genome of anOld Kingdom adult male Egyptian of relatively high-status, radiocarbon-dated to 2855–2570 BCE, with funerary practices archeologically attributed to theThird andFourth Dynasty, which was excavated in Nuwayrat (Nuerat, نويرات), in a cliff 265 km south of Cairo.[76][77] Before this study, whole-genome sequencing of ancient Egyptians from the early periods of Egyptian Dynastic history had not yet been accomplished, mainly because of the problematic DNA preservation conditions in Egypt.[76]
Ancestry model of Egyptian genome from Nuwayrat.[76]
The corpse had been placed intact in a large circular clay pot without embalming, and then installed inside a cliff tomb, which accounts for the comparatively good level of conservation of the skeleton and its DNA.[76]
Most of his genome derives from Neolithic North African ancestry, itself rooted in a Levantine expansion into northeast Africa ~8,000 years ago. The diffusion of this ancestry, later admixed with local components as seen in both Skhirat-Rouazi individuals and eastern African pastoralist groups, correlates closely with the introduction of southwest Asian domesticates such as sheep, goats, and cattle, coinciding with the rise of Saharan cattle pastoralism and the appearance of Ashakar Ware pottery in the Maghreb, and may have contributed to the early dispersal of Afro-Asiatic languages across North Africa.[78]
The remaining ~20% of his genetic ancestry derives from populations of the easternFertile Crescent, includingMesopotamia.[76] The resulting genetic profile is most closely represented by a two-source model, in which 77.6% ± 3.8% of the ancestry corresponded to genomes from the Middle Neolithic Moroccan site of Skhirat-Rouazi (dated to 4780–4230 BCE), which itself consists of predominantly (76.4 ± 4.0%) Levant Neolithic ancestry and (23.6 ± 4.0%) minorIberomaurusian ancestry, while the remainder (22.4% ± 3.8%) was most closely related to known genomes from NeolithicMesopotamia (dated to 9000-8000 BCE).[76][79]
In a three-source model, an additional stream of Neolithic/Chalcolithic Levant ancestry appears as a third, smaller component.[76] A 2022 DNA study had already shown evidence of gene flow from the Mesopotamian and Zagros regions into surrounding areas, including Anatolia, during the Neolithic, but not as far as Egypt yet.[79]
Cultural and migration flows from Mesopotamia to Egypt with genetic contribution (6th-4th millennium BCE).[80]
In terms of chronology, Egypt was one of the first areas to adopt the Neolithic package emerging from West Asia as early as the 6th millennium BCE.[76] Population genetics in the Nile Valley observed a marked change around this period, as shown by odontometric and dental tissue changes.[76] Cultural exchange and trade between the two regions then continued through the 4th millennium BCE, as shown by the transfer of MesopotamianLate Uruk period features to the Nile Valley of the laterPredynastic Period.[76] Migrations flows from Mesopotamia accompanied such cultural exchanges, possibly through the sea routes of the Mediterranean and the Red Sea or through yet un-sampled intermediaries in the Levant, which could explain the relative smallness of genetic influence from known Chalcolithic/Bronze Age Levantines populations.[76]
The authors acknowledged some limitations of the study such as the results deriving from one single Egyptian genome and that DNA analysis whilst indicative of population origin does not provide any evidence in relation to skin colour or facial hair.[81]
Overall, the 2025 study "provides direct evidence of genetic ancestry related to the eastern Fertile Crescent in ancient Egypt".[76] This genetic connection suggests that there had been ancient migration flows from the eastern Fertile Crescent to Egypt, in addition to the exchanges of objects and imagery (domesticated animals and plants, writing systems...) already observed.[76] This suggests a pattern of wide cultural and demographic expansion from the Mesopotamian region, which affected both Anatolia and Egypt during this period.[76]
Egypt records various exchanges with Semitic West Asian foreigners from around 1900 BCE, as in the paintings of the tomb ofKhnumhotep II atBeni Hassan.
In the last phase of historic exchanges during theNeo-Assyrian Empire (935 BC-605 BCE), theAssyrian conquest of Egypt occurred, and Assyrian rule and influence lasted till 655 BCE.[91][92] after Assyria had invaded and conquered Egypt with remarkable speed, defeating and driving out theNubianKushite Empire, the 25th Dynasty of Egypt, which had provoked Assyria by repeatedly but unsuccessfully attempting to gain an influence in the Southern Levant and Northern Arabian Peninsula by instigating and supporting rebellions by Israelites, Judeans, Moabites, Edomites, Phoenicians and Arabs against Assyrian rule during the reigns ofShalmaneser IV,Sargon II andSennacherib.
The Egyptian26th Dynasty had been installed in 663 BCE as native puppet rulers by the Assyrians after the destruction and deportation of the foreign Nubians of the 25th Dynasty by kingEsarhaddon and then came under the dominion of his successorsAshurbanipal. However, during the fall of the Neo Assyrian Empire between 612 and 599 BCE, Egypt attempted to aid its former masters probably due to the fear that without a strong Assyrian buffer they too would be overrun, having already been raided by maraudingScythians. As a result, Egypt came into conflict with Assyria's fellow Mesopotamian state ofBabylonia, which along with theMedes,Persians,Chaldeans,Cimmerians andScythians, amongst others, were fighting to throw off Assyrian rule, and PharaohNecho II fought alongside the last Assyrian emperorAshur-uballit II (612-c.605 BCE) againstNabopolassar,Cyaxares and their allies for a time. After the Assyrian Empire fell, Egypt engaged in a number of conflicts with Babylonia during the late 7th and early 6th century BCE in the Levant, before being driven from the region byNebuchadnezzar II of Babylonia.
TheAchaemenid Empire, though Iranic and not Mesopotamian, was heavily influenced by Mesopotamia in its art, architecture, written script and civil administration, the Persians having previously been subjects of Assyria for centuries,invaded Egypt and established satrapies, founding the AchaemenidTwenty-seventh Dynasty of Egypt (525–404 BCE) andThirty-first Dynasty of Egypt (343–332 BCE).
^Redford, Donald B.,Egypt, Israel, and Canaan in Ancient Times (Princeton: University Press, 1992), p. 13.
^Gardiner, Alan.Egypt of the Pharaohs (Oxford: University Press, 1961), p. 392.
^Shaw, Ian. and Nicholson, Paul,The Dictionary of Ancient Egypt (London: British Museum Press, 1995), p. 228.
^"Because the reverse is not true, namely there is no trace of an Egyptian presence in Mesopotamia at that time, all seems to point to a flow of ideas from Mesopotamia to Egypt.""Earliest Egyptian Glyphs – Archaeology Magazine Archive".archive.archaeology.org.
^abWilkinson, Toby (1999).Early dynastic Egypt. London: Routledge. p. 15.ISBN0-415-18633-1.
^*Pg84-85 "major burial sites of those founding locales of ancient Egypt in the fourth millennium BCE, notably El-Badari as well as Naqada, show no demographic indebtedness to the Levant. They reveal instead a population with cranial and dental features with closest parallels to those of other longtime populations of the surrounding areas of northeastern Africa, such as Nubia and the northern Horn of Africa".Ehret, Christopher (20 June 2023).Ancient Africa: A Global History, to 300 CE. Princeton: Princeton University Press. pp. 83–86,167–169.ISBN978-0-691-24409-9.
^Smith, Stuart Tyson (2001). Redford, Donald (ed.).The Oxford encyclopedia of ancient Egypt. Vol. 3.Oxford University Press. pp. 27–28.
^Yurco, Frank (1996). "An Egyptological Review". (1996).Black Athena revisited. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press. pp. 62–100.ISBN0-8078-4555-8.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
^Zakrzewski, Sonia R. (2003).Population continuity or population change: Formation of the ancient Egyptian state. Highfield, Southampton: Department of Archaeology, University of Southampton.
^Shomarka Keita and A.J. Boyce "The Geographic and Origins and Population Relationships of Early Ancient Egyptians". Celenko Theodore (ed). (1996).Egypt in Africa. Indianapolis, Ind.: Indianapolis Museum of Art. pp. 20–33.ISBN0-936260-64-5.
^Simson Najovits,Egypt, Trunk of the Tree: A Modern Survey of an Ancient Land, Algora Publishing, 2004, pp. 55–56.
^"And recent finds at Abydos that have pushed back the date of writing in Egypt, making it contemporaneous with the Mesopotamian invention, further undermine the old assumption that writing arose in Egypt under Sumerian influence."Woods, Christopher (2010).Visible Language: Inventions of Writing in the Ancient Middle East and Beyond. Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago. p. 16.
^""The world's earliest known writing systems emerged at more or less the same time, around 3300 bc, in Egypt and Mesopotamia (today's Iraq).""Teeter, Emily (2011).Before the Pyramids: The Origins of Egyptian Civilization. Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago. p. 99.
^ab"The seal impressions, from various tombs, date even further back, to 3400 B.C. These dates challenge the commonly held belief that early logographs, pictographic symbols representing a specific place, object, or quantity, first evolved into more complex phonetic symbols in Mesopotamia."Mitchell, Larkin."Earliest Egyptian Glyphs".Archaeology. Archaeological Institute of America. Retrieved29 February 2012.
^Ancient Civilizations of Africa Vol 2 (Unesco General History of Africa (abridged)) (Abridged ed.). London [England]: J. Currey. 1990. pp. 11–12.ISBN0-85255-092-8.
^Frank J.Yurco (1996)."The Origin and Development of Ancient Nile Valley Writing," in Egypt in Africa, Theodore Celenko (ed). Indianapolis, Ind.: Indianapolis Museum of Art. pp. 34–35.ISBN0-936260-64-5.
^Grajetzki, Wolfram (2014). "Tomb 197 at Abydos, Further Evidence for Long Distance Trade in the Middle Kingdom".Ägypten und Levante / Egypt and the Levant.24:159–170.doi:10.1553/s159.JSTOR43553796.
^Kamrin, Janice (2009). "The Aamu of Shu in the Tomb of Khnumhotep II at Beni Hassan".Journal of Ancient Egyptian Interconnections.1 (3).S2CID199601200.