Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Edwardsport Power Station

Coordinates:38°47′56″N87°15′0″W / 38.79889°N 87.25000°W /38.79889; -87.25000
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected fromEdwardsport IGCC)
Coal-fired power station in the United States

Edwardsport Power Station
Map
CountryUnited States
LocationVigo Township,Knox County, nearEdwardsport,Indiana
Coordinates38°47′56″N87°15′0″W / 38.79889°N 87.25000°W /38.79889; -87.25000
StatusOperational
Construction began1918
Commission date(old site)
Unit 1: 1918
Unit 2: 1944
Unit 3: 1949
Unit 4: 1951
(new site)
Unit 1: June, 2013
Decommission date(old site)
Unit 1: n.a.
Unit 2: 2010
Unit 3: 2010
Unit 4: 2010
Construction costUS$3.4 billion
OwnerDuke Energy
OperatorDuke Energy
Employees120
Thermal power station
Primary fuelBituminous coal
Secondary fuelCoal-derived Syngas
Tertiary fuelNatural gas
Turbine technologyIntegrated gasification combined cycle
Cooling sourceWhite River
Combined cycle?Yes
Power generation
Units operational1
Units decommissioned4
Nameplate capacity618MW
Capacity factor73%
Annual net output4000GW·h

Edwardsport Power Station is a 618 MWIntegrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) coal based power plant inVigo Township,Knox County, near the town ofEdwardsport, Indiana. The integratedgasificationcombined cycle power plant (Edwardsport IGCC) construction started in June 2008 byDuke Energy near the site of an older 160 MWcoal-firedelectrical power plant, which was decommissioned in 2010.

Edwardsport IGCC began commercial operations in June 2013.[1]

Older units

[edit]

First development was in 1918, followed by Units 2, 3 and 4, rated at 42.5, 42.5 and 75 MW respectively, were placed into service in 1944, 1949 and 1951.[2] The smaller, older units were retired when the new 618-MW plant came online.The old Edwardsport plant was officially taken offline in late 2011, and deconstruction began in mid-2010. The old Edwardsport plant was demolished in late October 2012.

IGCC units

[edit]

In 2007, Duke Energy Indiana began construction of a 618 megawatt (MW) integrated gasification combined cycle power plant (IGCC). This plant was to be the first of its kind of its size. Thegasification process makes coal react with pure oxygen and steam to produce synthetic gas, or syngas. Syngas burns cleaner than burning directly the coal and stripping the pollutants out of the exhaust gas. And syngas may be used to fire a combustion turbine. The combustion turbine exhaust gases are then routed through a largeheat recovery steam generator that is used in conjunction with asteam turbine to further increase the plant's efficiency. The new plant is slated to be a base-load station.The construction of the plant has reserved the necessary space required forcarbon capture and storage if Duke Energy decides to add this component to the plant at a later date.[3] However, when the plant was originally planned, it was thought the site was ready for carbon injection. After conducting further research, it was determined that the site is actually not geologically suitable for underground storage of carbon. Instead, Duke Energy Indiana would need to seek approval to construct a pipeline to transport carbon to a more suitable site.

Edwardsport's pollution per unit of energy produced will be greatly reduced, asparticulate matter andmercury will be removed from thesyngas. The coal-derived synthetic gas is much cleaner than conventional coal combustion to begin with, and it is easier to clean to greater extent. Coal gasification allowscarbon capture to occur before the fuel is combusted — a much easier and economically feasible operation than carbon capture of exhaust gases.

Technology

[edit]

The power plant has two trains ofGeneral Electric radiant quench gasification equipment. Each train fuels a General Electric 7FB 236 MW combustion turbine.Following each GE turbine is aDoosan two pressureHeat recovery steam generator (HRSG). Both HRSG recovered steam powers a single General Electric G13 326 MW four flow, reheat steam turbine. The plant is so defined as a 2 x 1 Combined Cycle. Gross power is 800 MW, but the syngas process consumes much energy, leaving only 618 MW net power to the grid. To save water, cooling is helped by a 20 cell mechanical draft cooling tower.

Cost overruns and controversy

[edit]

The construction of the Edwardsport IGCC has been clouded in controversy and legal troubles for both Duke Energy Indiana and the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission. Thus far, the legal issues have resulted in the resignation of the second highest ranked executive for Duke Energy, the dismissal of the Chairman of the IURC, David Lott Hardy, and Hardy's subsequent indictment for three felony counts of official misconduct in cases concerning Duke Energy,[4] although the charges were dismissed on 12 August 2013.[5][6]

Production

[edit]
Generation (MW·h) of Edwardsport Power Station[7]
YearJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
201354,406119,268272,509138,340195,973124,650147,0711,052,217
201481,31621,697148,195164,869302,967256,362308,374283,70166,419122,085315,521107,3022,178,808
2015305,460287,843350,54385,979116,476307,236368,309278,768361,116242,37261,803341,5663,107,471
2016342,873376,695351,127230,299152,651361,110347,328385,398276,943-6,81919,815255,1273,092,547
2017310,090365,765402,040297,422247,705372,725359,305366,476268,135228,520393,360357,7493,969,292
2018363,080340,008395,881197,941266,860323,412399,371397,584269,421272,865330,772404,8233,962,018
Total (2013–2018)17,362,353

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^"Edwardsport Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle Station Project Overview". Duke Energy.Archived from the original on 2017-07-16. Retrieved2017-07-16.
  2. ^"Existing Electric Generating Units in the United States, 2006"(Excel).Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy. 2006. Retrieved2008-07-14.
  3. ^"Duke Energy Reports Costs of Edwardsport IGCC". Compass Coal Services LLC. Retrieved2012-07-01.
  4. ^"Ex-IURC chairman indicted in Duke ethics scandal". IndyStar. Retrieved2012-07-01.
  5. ^"Customers may have to pay for problems at new power plant". IndyStar.Archived from the original on 2017-06-26. Retrieved2017-07-16.
  6. ^"Duke's Edwardsport Boondoggle: Overpaying and Underperforming".www.citact.org.Archived from the original on 2017-07-16. Retrieved2017-07-16.
  7. ^"Edwardsport, Monthly".Electricity Data Browser.Energy Information Administration. RetrievedOctober 15, 2019.

External links

[edit]
Operating coal-fired
generating stations
Decommissioned coal-fired
generating stations
Oil-fired peaking stations
Gas-fired peaking stations
Hydroelectric dams
Wind farms
Solar farms
Biomass to energy plants
Attempted nuclear plants
Utility companies
Coal-fired stations
Peaking stations
Dams
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Edwardsport_Power_Station&oldid=1309578969"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp