Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Dynamic range

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Ratio between the largest and smallest values that a certain quantity can assume
For other uses, seeDynamic range (disambiguation).

Dynamic range (abbreviatedDR,DNR,[1] orDYR[2]) is theratio between the largest and smallest measurable values of a specific quantity. It is often used in the context ofsignals, likesound andlight. It is measured either as a ratio or as abase-10 (decibel) orbase-2 (doublings,bits orstops)logarithmic value of the ratio between the largest and smallest signal values.[3]

Electronically reproduced audio and video is often processed to fit the original material with a wide dynamic range into a narrower recorded dynamic range for easier storage and reproduction. This process is calleddynamic range compression.

Human perception

[edit]
Power ratios and their equivalent decibels and stops (integer values in bold)
Factor (power)Decibels
(10×log10 power)
Stops
(log2 power)
100
23.011
3.1651.66
46.022
56.992.32
89.033
10103.32
1612.04
2013.04.32
31.6154.98
3215.15
5017.05.64
100206.64
1,000309.97
1,02430.110
10,0004013.3
100,0005016.6
1,000,0006019.9
1,048,57660.220
100,000,0008026.6
1,073,741,82490.330
10,000,000,00010033.2

The human senses ofsight andhearing have a relatively high dynamic range. However, a human cannot perform these feats of perception at both extremes of the scale at the same time. The human eye takes time to adjust to different light levels, and its dynamic range in a given scene is actually quite limited due to opticalglare. The instantaneous dynamic range of human audio perception is similarly subject tomasking so that, for example, a whisper cannot be heard in loud surroundings.

A human is capable of hearing (and usefully discerning) anything from a quiet murmur in asoundproofed room to the loudest heavy metal concert. Such a difference can exceed 100 dB which represents a factor of 100,000 inamplitude and a factor of 10,000,000,000 inpower.[4][5] The dynamic range of human hearing is roughly 140 dB,[6][7] varying with frequency,[8] from thethreshold of hearing (around −9 dB SPL[8][9][10] at 3 kHz) to thethreshold of pain (from 120 to 140 dB SPL[11][12][13]). This wide dynamic range cannot be perceived all at once, however; thetensor tympani,stapedius muscle, andouter hair cells all act as mechanicaldynamic range compressors to adjust the sensitivity of the ear to different ambient levels.[14]

A human can see objects instarlight[a] or in brightsunlight, even though on a moonless night objects receive one billionth (10−9) of the illumination they would on a bright sunny day; a dynamic range of 90 dB. Change of sensitivity is achieved in part through adjustments of the iris and slow chemical changes, which take some time.

In practice, it is difficult for humans to achieve the full dynamic experience using electronic equipment. For example, a good qualityliquid-crystal display (LCD) has a dynamic range limited to around 1000:1,[b] and some of the latestCMOS image sensors now[when?] have measured dynamic ranges of about 23,000:1.[15][c] Paper reflectance can produce a dynamic range of about 100:1.[16] Aprofessional video camera such as the Sony Digital Betacam achieves a dynamic range of greater than 90 dB in audio recording.[17]

Audio

[edit]

Audio engineers usedynamic range to describe the ratio of the amplitude of the loudest possibleundistorted signal to thenoise floor, say of amicrophone orloudspeaker.[18] Dynamic range is therefore thesignal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for the case where the signal is the loudest possible for the system. For example, if the ceiling of a device is 5 V (rms) and the noise floor is 10 μV (rms) then the dynamic range is 500000:1, or 114 dB:

20×log10(5V10μV)=20×log10(500000)=20×5.7=114dB{\displaystyle 20\times \log _{10}\left({\frac {\rm {5\,V}}{10\,\mu \mathrm {V} }}\right)=20\times \log _{10}(500000)=20\times 5.7=114\,\mathrm {dB} }

In digital audio theory the dynamic range is limited byquantization error. The maximum achievable dynamic range for a digital audio system withQ-bit uniform quantization is calculated as the ratio of the largest sine-wave rms to rms noise is:[19]

DRADC=20×log10(2Q1)=(6.02Q) dB{\displaystyle \mathrm {DR_{ADC}} =20\times \log _{10}\left({\frac {2^{Q}}{1}}\right)=\left(6.02\cdot Q\right)\ \mathrm {dB} \,\!}

However, the usable dynamic range may be greater, as a properlydithered recording device can record signals well below the noise floor.

The 16-bitcompact disc has a theoretical undithered dynamic range of about 96 dB;[20][d] however, theperceived dynamic range of 16-bit audio can be 120 dB or more withnoise-shapeddither, taking advantage ofthe frequency response of the human ear.[21][22]

Digital audio with undithered 20-bit quantization is theoretically capable of 120 dB dynamic range, while 24-bit digital audio affords 144 dB dynamic range.[6] MostDigital audio workstations process audio with 32-bitfloating-point representation which affords even higher dynamic range and so loss of dynamic range is no longer a concern in terms ofdigital audio processing. Dynamic range limitations typically result from impropergain staging, recording technique includingambient noise and intentional application ofdynamic range compression.

Dynamic range in analog audio is the difference between low-level thermal noise in the electronic circuitry and high-level signal saturation resulting in increased distortion and, if pushed higher,clipping.[23] Multiple noise processes determine the noise floor of a system. Noise can be picked up from microphone self-noise, preamp noise, wiring and interconnection noise, media noise, etc.

Early 78 rpm phonograph discs had a dynamic range of up to 40 dB,[24] soon reduced to 30 dB and worse due to wear from repeated play. Vinyl microgroove phonograph records typically yield 55-65 dB, though the first play of the higher-fidelity outer rings can achieve a dynamic range of 70 dB.[25]

German magnetic tape in 1941 was reported to have had a dynamic range of 60 dB,[26] though modern-day restoration experts of such tapes note 45-50 dB as the observed dynamic range.[27]Ampex tape recorders in the 1950s achieved 60 dB in practical usage,[26] In the 1960s, improvements in tape formulation processes resulted in 7 dB greater range,[28]: 158  and Ray Dolby developed theDolby A-Type noise reduction system that increased low- and mid-frequency dynamic range on magnetic tape by 10 dB, and high-frequency by 15 dB, usingcompanding (compression and expansion) of four frequency bands.[28]: 169  The peak of professional analog magnetic recording tape technology reached 90 dB dynamic range in the midband frequencies at 3% distortion, or about 80 dB in practical broadband applications.[28]: 158  TheDolby SR noise reduction system gave a 20 dB further increased range resulting in 110 dB in the midband frequencies at 3% distortion.[28]: 172 

Compact Cassette tape performance ranges from 50 to 56 dB depending on tape formulation, withtype IV tape tapes giving the greatest dynamic range, and systems such asXDR,dbx andDolby noise reduction system increasing it further. Specialized bias and record head improvements by Nakamichi and Tandberg combined with Dolby C noise reduction yielded 72 dB dynamic range for the cassette.[citation needed]

Adynamic microphone is able to withstand high sound intensity and can have a dynamic range of up to 140 dB. Condenser microphones are also rugged but their dynamic range may be limited by the overloading of their associated electronic circuitry.[29] Practical considerations of acceptable distortion levels in microphones combined with typical practices in a recording studio result in a useful dynamic range of 125 dB.[28]: 75 

In 1981, researchers at Ampex determined that a dynamic range of 118 dB on a dithered digital audio stream was necessary for subjective noise-free playback of music in quiet listening environments.[30]

Since the early 1990s, it has been recommended by several authorities, including theAudio Engineering Society, that measurements of dynamic range be made with an audio signal present, which is then filtered out in the noise floor measurement used in determining dynamic range.[31] This avoids questionable measurements based on the use of blank media, or muting circuits.

The termdynamic range may be confusing in audio production because it has two conflicting definitions, particularly in the understanding of theloudness war phenomenon.[32][33]Dynamic range may refer to micro-dynamics,[34][35][36] related tocrest factor,[37][38] whereas theEuropean Broadcasting Union, in EBU3342 Loudness Range, definesdynamic range as the difference between the quietest and loudest volume, a matter of macro-dynamics.[32][33][39][40][41][42]

Electronics

[edit]

Inelectronics dynamic range is used in the following contexts:

  • Specifies the ratio of a maximum level of aparameter, such aspower,current,voltage[43] orfrequency, to the minimum detectable value of that parameter. (SeeAudio system measurements.)
  • In atransmission system, the ratio of the overload level (the maximumsignal power that the system can tolerate withoutdistortion of the signal) to thenoise level of the system.
  • Indigital systems or devices, the ratio of maximum and minimum signal levels required to maintain a specifiedbit error ratio.
  • Optimization of bit width of digital data path (according to the dynamic ranges of signal) can reduce the area, cost, and power consumption of digital circuits and systems while improving their performance. Optimal bit width for a digital data path is the smallest bit width that can satisfy the required signal-to-noise ratio and also avoid overflow.[44][45][46][47][48][verification needed]

In audio and electronics applications, the ratio involved is often large enough that it is converted to alogarithm and specified indecibels.[43]

Metrology

[edit]
icon
This sectionneeds additional citations forverification. Please helpimprove this article byadding citations to reliable sources in this section. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.(June 2009) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Inmetrology, such as when performed in support of science, engineering or manufacturing objectives, dynamic range refers to the range of values that can be measured by a sensor or metrology instrument. Often this dynamic range of measurement is limited at one end of the range by saturation of a sensing signal sensor or by physical limits that exist on the motion or other response capability of a mechanical indicator. The other end of the dynamic range of measurement is often limited by one or more sources of randomnoise or uncertainty in signal levels that may be described as defining thesensitivity of the sensor or metrology device. When digital sensors or sensor signal converters are a component of the sensor or metrology device, the dynamic range of measurement will be also related to the number of binary digits (bits) used in a digital numeric representation in which the measured value is linearly related to the digital number.[43] For example, a 12-bit digital sensor or converter can provide a dynamic range in which the ratio of the maximum measured value to the minimum measured value is up to 212 = 4096.

Metrology systems and devices may use several basic methods to increase their basic dynamic range. These methods include averaging and other forms of filtering, correction of receivers characteristics,[43] repetition of measurements, nonlinear transformations to avoid saturation, etc. In more advance forms of metrology, such as multiwavelengthdigital holography,interferometry measurements made at different scales (different wavelengths) can be combined to retain the same low-end resolution while extending the upper end of the dynamic range of measurement by orders of magnitude.

Music

[edit]

Inmusic, dynamic range describes the difference between the quietest and loudest volume of aninstrument,part or piece of music.[49] In modern recording, this range is often limited throughdynamic range compression, which allows for louder volume, but can make the recording sound less exciting or live.[50]

The dynamic range of music as normally perceived in a concert hall does not exceed 80 dB, and human speech is normally perceived over a range of about 40 dB.[28]: 4 

Photography

[edit]
A scene demanding high dynamic range, taken with theNikon D7000 digital camera, capable of 13.9 stops of dynamic range perDxOMark.[51] The unedited version of the digital photo is to the left, while the shadows have beenpushed heavily inPhotoshop to produce the final image on the right. The better the dynamic range of the camera, the more an exposure can be pushed without significantly increasingnoise.

Photographers usedynamic range to describe theluminance range of a scene being photographed, or the limits of luminance range that a givendigital camera orfilm can capture,[52] or theopacity range of developed film images, or thereflectance range of images on photographic papers.

The dynamic range ofdigital photography is comparable to the capabilities ofphotographic film[53] and both are comparable to the capabilities of the human eye.[54]

There are photographic techniques that support even higher dynamic range.

  • Graduated neutral density filters are used to decrease the dynamic range of scene luminance that can be captured onphotographic film (or on theimage sensor of adigital camera): The filter is positioned in front of the lens at the time the exposure is made; the top half is dark and the bottom half is clear. The dark area is placed over a scene's high-intensity region, such as the sky. The result is more even exposure in the focal plane, with increased detail in the shadows and low-light areas. Though this does not increase the fixed dynamic range available at the film or sensor, it stretches usable dynamic range in practice.[55]
  • High-dynamic-range imaging overcomes the limited dynamic range of the sensor by selectively combining multiple exposures of the same scene in order to retain detail in light and dark areas.Tone mapping maps the image differently in shadow and highlights in order to better distribute the lighting range across the image. The same approach has been used in chemical photography to capture an extremely wide dynamic range: A three-layer film with each underlying layer at one hundredth (10−2) the sensitivity of the next higher one has, for example, been used to record nuclear-weapons tests.[56]

Consumer-gradeimage file formats sometimes restrict dynamic range.[57] The most severe dynamic-range limitation in photography may not involve encoding, but rather reproduction to, say, a paper print or computer screen. In that case, not only local tone mapping but alsodynamic range adjustment can be effective in revealing detail throughout light and dark areas: The principle is the same as that ofdodging and burning (using different lengths of exposures in different areas when making a photographic print) in the chemical darkroom. The principle is also similar to gain riding or automatic level control in audio work, which serves to keep a signal audible in a noisy listening environment and to avoid peak levels that overload the reproducing equipment, or which are unnaturally or uncomfortably loud.

If a camera sensor is incapable of recording the full dynamic range of a scene,high-dynamic-range (HDR) techniques may be used in postprocessing, which generally involve combining multiple exposures using software.

Dynamic ranges of common devices
DeviceStopsContrast ratioOptical density
Glossy photograph paper7 (7–7+23)[58]128:12.1
LCD9.5 (9–11)[59]720:1 (510:1 – 2000:1)2.9 (2.7 – 3.3)
Typical cellphone camera~10[60][failed verification]varies[e]
Negative film (Kodak VISION3)13[62]8200:13.9
Human eye10–14[54]1000:1 – 16000:13 – 4.2
OLED orquantum dot13.2 – 20.9[63]9400:1 – 1960000:14 – 6.3
High-end DSLR camera (Nikon D850)14.8[64]28500:14.5
Digital cinema camera (Red Weapon 8k)> 16.5[65]>92700:1>5

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^Colour differentiation is reduced at low light levels.
  2. ^Commercially the dynamic range is often called thecontrast ratio meaning the full-on to full-offluminance ratio.
  3. ^Reported as 14.5stops, or doublings, equivalent tobinary digits.
  4. ^The 96 dB figure is for atriangle orsine wave. Dynamic range is 98 dB forsine wave[19] (seeQuantization noise model).
  5. ^Starting from the mid-2010s, including the GoogleNexus 6, smartphones have adoptedcomputational photography to combine multiple exposures to increase dynamic range in a processed image compared to a single image natively captured from the sensor. For example, videos taken with the iPhone 15 Pro (2023) were tested to have approximately 12 stops of dynamic range.[61]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ISSCC Glossaryhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?arnumber=4242527
  2. ^"Archived copy"(PDF).Archived(PDF) from the original on 2015-04-11. Retrieved2016-08-11.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link),"Archived copy"(PDF).Archived(PDF) from the original on 2016-08-22. Retrieved2016-08-11.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link),"The data aquisition [sic] method of the Sussex MK4 EIM system"(PDF). 24 April 2014.Archived(PDF) from the original on 2016-08-27. Retrieved2016-08-11.
  3. ^"Dynamic range",Electropedia, IEC,archived from the original on 2015-04-26
  4. ^D. R. Campbell."Aspects of Human Hearing"(PDF). Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 2011-08-21. Retrieved2011-04-21.The dynamic range of human hearing is [approximately] 120 dB
  5. ^"Sensitivity of Human Ear".Archived from the original on 2011-06-04. Retrieved2011-04-21.The practical dynamic range could be said to be from the threshold of hearing to the threshold of pain [130 dB]
  6. ^abHuber, David Miles; Runstein, Robert E. (2009).Modern Recording Techniques (7 ed.). Focal Press. p. 513.ISBN 978-0-240-81069-0.Archived from the original on 2017-11-20.the overall dynamic range of human hearing roughly encompasses a full 140 dB
  7. ^"Occupational Noise Exposure, CDC DHHS (NIOSH) Publication Number 98-126". 1998.doi:10.26616/NIOSHPUB98126.Archived from the original on 2017-07-13.{{cite journal}}:Cite journal requires|journal= (help)
  8. ^abMontgomery, Christopher."24/192 Music Downloads ...and why they make no sense".xiph.org. Archived fromthe original on 2020-04-26. Retrieved2022-05-10.The very quietest perceptible sound is about -8dbSPL
  9. ^Jones, Pete R (November 20, 2014)."What's the quietest sound a human can hear?"(PDF). University College London.Archived(PDF) from the original on March 24, 2016. Retrieved2016-03-16.On the other hand, you can also see in Figure 1 that our hearing is slightly more sensitive to frequencies just above 1 kHz, where thresholds can be as low as −9 dB SPL!
  10. ^Feilding, Charles."Lecture 007 Hearing II".College of Santa Fe Auditory Theory. Archived fromthe original on 2016-05-07. Retrieved2016-03-17.The peak sensitivities shown in this figure are equivalent to a sound pressure amplitude in the sound wave of 10 μPa or: about -6 dB (SPL). Note that this is for monaural listening to a sound presented at the front of the listener. For sounds presented on the listening side of the head there is a rise in peak sensitivity of about 6 dB [−12 dB SPL] due to the increase in pressure caused by reflection from the head.
  11. ^Newman, Edwin B. (1972-01-01). "Speech and Hearing".American Institute of Physics handbook. New York: McGraw-Hill. pp. 3–155.ISBN 978-0070014855.OCLC 484327.The upper limit for a tolerable intensity of sound rises substantially with increasing habituation. Moreover, a variety of subjective effects are reported, such as discomfort, tickle, pressure, and pain, each at a slightly different level. As a simple engineering estimate it can be said that naive listeners reach a limit at about 125 dB SPL and experienced listeners at 135 to 140 dB.
  12. ^Nave, Carl R. (2006)."Threshold of Pain".HyperPhysics. SciLinks.Archived from the original on 2009-07-06. Retrieved2009-06-16.A nominal figure for the threshold of pain is 130 decibels ... Some sources quote 120 dB as the pain threshold
  13. ^Franks, John R.; Stephenson, Mark R.; Merry, Carol J., eds. (June 1996).Preventing Occupational Hearing Loss - A Practical Guide(PDF).National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. p. 88.Archived(PDF) from the original on 2009-04-23. Retrieved2009-07-15.the threshold for pain is between 120 and 140 dB SPL.
  14. ^"How The Ear Works".www.soundonsound.com.Archived from the original on 2015-06-06. Retrieved2016-03-18.
  15. ^"DXOmark Sensor Ranking". Archived fromthe original on 2010-05-05. Retrieved2015-06-12.
  16. ^"Dynamic Range in Digital Photography".Archived from the original on 2011-07-17. Retrieved2011-07-11.
  17. ^"Sony Product Detail Page MSWM2100/1". Sony Pro. Archived fromthe original on 2012-02-29. Retrieved2011-12-30.
  18. ^Ballou Glen M.,Handbook for Sound Engineers, 3rd edition, Focal Press 2002, pp. 1107-1108
  19. ^abBernd Seeber (1998).Handbook of applied superconductivity. CRC Press. pp. 1861–1862.ISBN 978-0-7503-0377-4.Archived from the original on 2017-11-20.
  20. ^Fries, Bruce; Marty Fries (2005).Digital Audio Essentials. O'Reilly Media. p. 147.ISBN 978-0-596-00856-7.Archived from the original on 2017-01-09.Digital audio at 16-bit resolution has a theoretical dynamic range of 96 dB, but the actual dynamic range is usually lower because of overhead from filters that are built into most audio systems." ... "Audio CDs achieve about a 90-dB signal-to-noise ratio.
  21. ^Montgomery, Chris (March 25, 2012)."24/192 Music Downloads ...and why they make no sense".xiph.org. Archived fromthe original on 7 July 2013. Retrieved26 May 2013.With use of shaped dither, which moves quantization noise energy into frequencies where it's harder to hear, the effective dynamic range of 16 bit audio reaches 120dB in practice, more than fifteen times deeper than the 96dB claim. 120dB is greater than the difference between a mosquito somewhere in the same room and a jackhammer a foot away.... or the difference between a deserted 'soundproof' room and a sound loud enough to cause hearing damage in seconds. 16 bits is enough to store all we can hear, and will be enough forever.
  22. ^Stuart, J. Robert (1997)."Coding High Quality Digital Audio"(PDF). Meridian Audio Ltd. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 2016-04-07. Retrieved2016-02-25.One of the great discoveries in PCM was that, by adding a small random noise (that we call dither) the truncation effect can disappear. Even more important was the realisation that there is aright sort of random noise to add, and that when the right dither is used, the resolution of the digital system becomesinfinite.
  23. ^Huber, Runstein 2009,pp. 416, 487Archived 2017-11-20 at theWayback Machine
  24. ^Audio Engineering Society. E-Library. Jerry B. Minter. April 1956.Recent Developments in Precision Master Recording LathesArchived 2008-12-11 at theWayback Machine
  25. ^Day, Timothy (2002).A Century of Recorded Music: Listening to Musical History. Yale University Press. p. 23.ISBN 978-0-300-09401-5.Archived from the original on 2017-11-20.
  26. ^abDaniel, Eric D.; C. Denis Mee; Mark H. Clark (1998).Magnetic Recording: The First 100 Years. Wiley-IEEE Press. p. 64.ISBN 978-0-7803-4709-0.
  27. ^Richard L. Hess (July–August 2001),The Jack Mullin/Bill Palmer tape restoration project(PDF), Audio Engineering Society, archived fromthe original(PDF) on 2008-12-01
  28. ^abcdefJohn Eargle (2005).Handbook of Recording Engineering. Springer Science & Business Media.ISBN 9780387284705.
  29. ^Huber; Runstein (2010).Modern Recording Techniques. Taylor & Francis. p. 127.ISBN 9780240810690.Archived from the original on 2017-11-20.
  30. ^Audio Engineering Society. E-Library. Louis D. Fielder. May 1981.Dynamic Range Requirement for Subjective Noise Free Reproduction of MusicArchived 2008-12-11 at theWayback Machine
  31. ^AES-6id-2000
  32. ^abDeruty, Emmanuel (September 2011)."'Dynamic Range' & The Loudness War".Sound on Sound.Archived from the original on 2013-11-08. Retrieved2013-10-24.
  33. ^abEmmanuel Deruty; Damien Tardieu (January 2014). "About Dynamic Processing in Mainstream Music".Journal of the Audio Engineering Society.62 (1/2):42–55.doi:10.17743/jaes.2014.0001.
  34. ^Katz, Robert (2002). "9".Mastering Audio. Amsterdam: Boston. p. 109.ISBN 978-0-240-80545-0.
  35. ^Ian Shepherd (2011-08-18)."Why the Loudness War hasn't reduced 'Loudness Range'". Archived fromthe original on 2014-02-09. Retrieved2014-02-06.
  36. ^Jason Victor Serinus."Winning the Loudness Wars".Stereophile. Archived fromthe original on 2014-02-09. Retrieved2014-02-06.
  37. ^Earl Vickers (November 4, 2010)."The Loudness War: Background, Speculation and Recommendations"(PDF).AES 2010: Paper Sessions: Loudness and Dynamics. San Francisco:Audio Engineering Society.Archived(PDF) from the original on 2022-10-09. RetrievedJuly 14, 2011.
  38. ^"Dynamic Range Meter". Archived fromthe original on 2014-10-27. Retrieved2018-11-27.
  39. ^Tech 3342 - Loudness Range: a Measure to Supplement EBU R 128 Loudness Normalization(PDF),European Broadcasting Union,archived(PDF) from the original on 2016-06-08, retrieved2016-07-30
  40. ^Serrà, J; Corral, A; Boguñá, M; Haro, M; Arcos, JL (26 July 2012)."Measuring the Evolution of Contemporary Western Popular Music".Scientific Reports.2 521.arXiv:1205.5651.Bibcode:2012NatSR...2..521S.doi:10.1038/srep00521.PMC 3405292.PMID 22837813.
  41. ^Hjortkjær, Jens; Walther-Hansen, Mads (2014). "Perceptual Effects of Dynamic Range Compression in Popular Music Recordings".Journal of the Audio Engineering Society.62:37–41.doi:10.17743/jaes.2014.0003.
  42. ^Esben Skovenborg (April 2012)."Loudness Range (LRA) – Design and Evaluation". AES 132nd Convention.Archived from the original on 2014-10-25. Retrieved2014-10-25.
  43. ^abcdSlyusar, Vadim I. (2004)."A method of investigation of the linear dynamic range of reception channels in a digital antenna array"(PDF).Radioelectronics and Communications Systems (Military Radioelectronic Technologies special issue).47 (9):20–25.doi:10.3103/S0735272704090043 (inactive 1 July 2025).Archived(PDF) from the original on 2016-02-05. Retrieved2022-05-01.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of July 2025 (link)
  44. ^Bin Wu; Jianwen Zhu; Najm, F.N. (2006). "Dynamic-range estimation".IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems.25 (9):1618–1636.arXiv:0802.3458.Bibcode:2006ITCAD..25.1618W.doi:10.1109/tcad.2005.859507.S2CID 11725031.
  45. ^Wu, Bin; Zhu, Jianwen; Najm, Farid N. (2004). "An analytical approach for dynamic range estimation".Proceedings of the 41st annual conference on Design automation - DAC '04. p. 472.doi:10.1145/996566.996699.ISBN 1581138288.S2CID 8509478.
  46. ^Bin Wu; Jianwen Zhu; Najm, F.N. (2004). "Dynamic range estimation for nonlinear systems".IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer Aided Design, 2004. ICCAD-2004. pp. 660–667.doi:10.1109/iccad.2004.1382658.ISBN 0-7803-8702-3.S2CID 12949210.
  47. ^Bin Wu; Jianwen Zhu; Najm, F.N. (2005). "A non-parametric approach for dynamic range estimation of nonlinear systems".Proceedings. 42nd Design Automation Conference, 2005. pp. 841–844.doi:10.1109/dac.2005.193932.ISBN 1-59593-058-2.
  48. ^Wu, Bin (2012). "Dynamic range estimation for systems with control-flow structures".Thirteenth International Symposium on Quality Electronic Design (ISQED). pp. 370–377.doi:10.1109/isqed.2012.6187520.ISBN 978-1-4673-1036-9.S2CID 1045127.
  49. ^Schmidt, J.C.; Rutledge, J.C. (1996). "Multichannel dynamic range compression for music signals".1996 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing Conference Proceedings. Vol. 2. IEEE. pp. 1013–1016.doi:10.1109/ICASSP.1996.543295.ISBN 978-0-7803-3192-1.S2CID 5688882.
  50. ^"The Death Of Dynamic Range". CD Mastering Services. Archived fromthe original on 2008-06-22. Retrieved2008-07-17.
  51. ^"Nikon D7000 : Tests and Reviews".DxO Labs. RetrievedDecember 30, 2017.
  52. ^Karol Myszkowski; Rafal Mantiuk; Grzegorz Krawczyk (2008).High Dynamic Range Video. Morgan & Claypool Publishers.ISBN 978-1-59829-214-5.Archived from the original on 2014-01-08.
  53. ^Michael Archambault (2015-05-26)."Film vs. Digital: A Comparison of the Advantages and Disadvantages". Archived fromthe original on 2016-06-17. Retrieved2016-07-14.
  54. ^ab"Dynamic Range in Digital Photography". PetaPixel.Archived from the original on 2016-07-08. Retrieved2016-07-14.
  55. ^Rob Sheppard (2006).The Magic of Digital Nature Photography. Sterling Publishing Company.ISBN 978-1-57990-773-0.
  56. ^The Militarily Critical Technologies ListArchived 2010-06-15 at theWayback Machine (1998), pages II-5-100 and II-5-107.
  57. ^"RAW vs. JPEG Overview". SLR Lounge. Archived fromthe original on 2016-08-17. Retrieved2016-07-14.
  58. ^"Paper grades". RetrievedNovember 9, 2019.
  59. ^Terry Relph-Knight (July 16, 2018)."High Dynamic Range: The quest for greater image realism". ZD Net. Retrieved2022-12-25.
  60. ^"Of Phones, Pixels and Photons – why a 100 mp cell phone is not a GFX 100 - Luminous Landscape". 2021-04-27.
  61. ^Machu, Gunther (November 29, 2023)."iPhone 15 Pro Lab Test: Rolling Shutter, Dynamic Range and Exposure Latitude".CineD. Retrieved16 July 2025.
  62. ^"Dynamic Range".[permanent dead link]
  63. ^Brian Wagner (July 2, 2020)."HDR Nits are a Lie: It's Time to Embrace the Stop". Retrieved2022-12-25.[self-published source?]
  64. ^"Nikon D850 : Tests and Reviews".DxO Labs. RetrievedDecember 30, 2017.
  65. ^"Red Weapon 8k Rating by DxOMark". 2017-01-10.Archived from the original on 2017-06-19.

External list

[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dynamic_range&oldid=1314172616"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp