Pronoun having no referent, only used to fulfill grammatical rules; e.g. "it" as in "it rains"
Adummy pronoun, also known as anexpletive pronoun, is apronoun that does notrefer to anything, and exists only to satisfy asyntactic requirement.[1] For example, in the sentence "It rained" theEnglish pronoun "it" is generally analyzed as a dummy pronoun, inserted to fill the subject position, but not referring to anything.
The term 'dummy pronoun' refers to the function of a word in a particular sentence, not a property of individual words. For example, 'it' in the example from the previous paragraph is a dummy pronoun, but 'it' in the sentence "I bought asandwich and ateit" is a referential pronoun (referring to the sandwich).
Unlike a regular pronoun, dummy pronouns cannot be replaced by anynoun phrase.[2]
One of the most common uses of dummy pronouns is with weather verbs, such as in the phrases "it is snowing" or "it is hot."[11] In these sentences, the verb (to snow, to rain, etc.) is usually consideredsemanticallyimpersonal even though it appears syntacticallyintransitive; in this view, the requiredit in "it is snowing" is a dummy word that does not refer. In English literature, there is also marginal use of the feminineshe, such as in the phrase "She's going to rain."[12]
Although the weatherit is frequently considered a dummy pronoun,[13] there have been a few objections to this interpretation.Noam Chomsky has argued that theit employed as thesubject of Englishweather verbs can control the subject of anadjunct clause, just like a "normal" subject.[14] For example, compare:
She brushes her teeth before having a bath.
→She brushes her teeth before she has a bath.
It sometimes rains after snowing.
→It sometimes rains after it snows.
If this analysis is accepted, then the "weatherit" is to be considered a "quasi-(verb)argument" and not a dummy word.
Somelinguists such asD. L. Bolinger go further, claiming that the "weatherit" simply refers to a general state of affairs in the context of the utterance.[15] In this case, it would not be a dummy word at all. Possible evidence for this claim includes exchanges such as:
Another common use of dummy pronouns in English is the use ofthere inexistential clauses, such as in the phrase "there are polar bears in Norway."[16][17] This is also occasionally referred to as the anticipatorythere.[18]
This should be distinguished from the locativethere, as in "I saw a polar bear overthere." This use ofthere acts as alocative adverb rather than a subject.[19]
While the existential use ofthere has generally been analyzed as a subject,[20] it has been proposed that elements like expletivethere inexistential sentences andpro-forms ininverse copular sentences play the role of dummy predicate rather than dummy subject, so that the postverbalnoun phrase would rather be the embedded subject of thesentence.[21]
In English, dummyobject pronouns tend to serve anad hoc function, applying with less regularity than dummy subjects, though use of the dummy object can be traced at least as far back as the early sixteenth century.[24]
^Hyman, Larry M.; Comrie, Bernard (1981). "Logophoric Reference in Gokana".Journal of African Languages and Linguistics.3 (1).doi:10.1515/jall.1981.3.1.19.
^Indrambarya, Kitima (1996).On Impersonal Verbs in Thai. Fourth International Symposium on Language and Linguistics. Vol. 1. Department of Foreign Languages Kasetsart University. pp. 505–521.
^Eriksen, Pål Kristian; Kittilä, Seppo; Kolehmainen, Leena (1 January 2010). "The linguistics of weather: Cross-linguistic patterns of meteorological expressions".Studies in Language.34 (3):565–601.doi:10.1075/sl.34.3.03eri.hdl:10138/250879.
^Wang, Yong (2025).A typological study of the existential clause: a functional linguistics perspective. Abingdon, Oxon; New York, NY: Routledge.ISBN9781032794730.
^Moro, Andrea (1997).The raising of predicates: predicative noun phrases and the theory of clause structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.ISBN9780511519956.
^Radford, Andrew (1997).Syntactic Theory and the Structure of English (1st ed.). West Nyack: Cambridge University Press.ISBN9781139166706.
^abKaltenböck, Gunther (14 June 2005). "It-extraposition in English: A functional view".International Journal of Corpus Linguistics.10 (2):119–159.doi:10.1075/ijcl.10.2.02kal.
^Mondorf, Britta (1 January 2016). ""Snake legs it to freedom": Dummy it as pseudo-object"".Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory.12 (1).doi:10.1515/cllt-2015-0071.
Everaert, M. - van Riemsdijk, H - Goedemans, R. (eds) 2006 The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Volumes I-V, Blackwell, London: see "existential sentences and expletive there" in Volume II.
Graffi, G. 2001 200 Years of Syntax. A critical survey, John Benjamins, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.