This article needs editing tocomply with Wikipedia'sManual of Style. In particular, it has problems withMOS:FORMULA - avoid mixing <math>...</math> and{{math}} in the same expression. Please helpimprove the content.(July 2025) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
Inmathematics, anyvector space has a correspondingdual vector space (or justdual space for short) consisting of alllinear forms on together with the vector space structure ofpointwise addition andscalar multiplication by constants.
The dual space as defined above is defined for all vector spaces, and to avoid ambiguity may also be called thealgebraic dual space.When defined for atopological vector space, there is a subspace of the dual space, corresponding tocontinuous linear functionals, called thecontinuous dual space.
Dual vector spaces find application in many branches of mathematics that use vector spaces, such as intensor analysis withfinite-dimensional vector spaces.When applied to vector spaces of functions (which are typically infinite-dimensional), dual spaces are used to describemeasures,distributions, andHilbert spaces. Consequently, the dual space is an important concept infunctional analysis.
Early terms fordual includepolarer Raum [Hahn 1927],espace conjugué,adjoint space [Alaoglu 1940], andtransponierter Raum [Schauder 1930] and [Banach 1932]. The termdual is due toBourbaki 1938.[1]
Given anyvector space over afield, the(algebraic) dual space[2] (alternatively denoted by[3] or[4][5])[nb 1] is defined as the set of alllinear maps (linear functionals). Since linear maps are vector spacehomomorphisms, the dual space may be denoted.[3]The dual space itself becomes a vector space over when equipped with an addition and scalar multiplication satisfying:
for all,, and.
Elements of the algebraic dual space are sometimes calledcovectors,one-forms, orlinear forms.
The pairing of a functional in the dual space and an element of is sometimes denoted by a bracket:[6]or.[7] This pairing defines a nondegeneratebilinear mapping[nb 2] called thenatural pairing.
If is finite-dimensional, then has the same dimension as. Given abasis in, it is possible to construct a specific basis in, called thedual basis. This dual basis is a set of linear functionals on, defined by the relation
for any choice of coefficients. In particular, letting in turn each one of those coefficients be equal to one and the other coefficients zero, gives the system of equations
where is theKronecker delta symbol. This property is referred to as thebi-orthogonality property.
Proof |
|---|
Consider the basis of V. Let be defined as the following: . These are a basis of because:
and generates. Hence, it is a basis of. |
For example, if is, let its basis be chosen as. The basis vectors are not orthogonal to each other. Then, and areone-forms (functions that map a vector to a scalar) such that,,, and. (Note: The superscript here is the index, not an exponent.) This system of equations can be expressed using matrix notation as
Solving for the unknown values in the first matrix shows the dual basis to be. Because and are functionals, they can be rewritten as and.
In general, when is, if is a matrix whose columns are the basis vectors and is a matrix whose columns are the dual basis vectors, then
where is theidentity matrix of order. The biorthogonality property of these two basis sets allows any point to be represented as
even when the basis vectors are not orthogonal to each other. Strictly speaking, the above statement only makes sense once the inner product and the corresponding duality pairing are introduced, as described below in§ Bilinear products and dual spaces.
In particular, can be interpreted as the space of columns ofreal numbers, its dual space is typically written as the space ofrows of real numbers. Such a row acts on as a linear functional by ordinarymatrix multiplication. This is because a functional maps every-vector into a real number. Then, seeing this functional as a matrix, and as an matrix, and a matrix (trivially, a real number) respectively, if then, by dimension reasons, must be a matrix; that is, must be a row vector.
If consists of the space of geometricalvectors in the plane, then thelevel curves of an element of form a family of parallel lines in, because the range is 1-dimensional, so that every point in the range is a multiple of any one nonzero element.So an element of can be intuitively thought of as a particular family of parallel lines covering the plane. To compute the value of a functional on a given vector, it suffices to determine which of the lines the vector lies on. Informally, this "counts" how many lines the vector crosses.More generally, if is a vector space of any dimension, then thelevel sets of a linear functional in are parallel hyperplanes in, and the action of a linear functional on a vector can be visualized in terms of these hyperplanes.[8]
If is not finite-dimensional but has abasis[nb 3] indexed by an infinite set, then the same construction as in the finite-dimensional case yieldslinearly independent elements () of the dual space, but they will not form a basis.
For instance, consider the space, whose elements are thosesequences of real numbers that contain only finitely many non-zero entries, which has a basis indexed by the natural numbers. For, is the sequence consisting of all zeroes except in the-th position, which is 1.The dual space of is (isomorphic to), the space ofall sequences of real numbers: each real sequence defines a function where the element of is sent to the number
which is a finite sum because there are only finitely many nonzero. Thedimension of iscountably infinite, whereas does not have a countable basis.
This observation generalizes to any[nb 3] infinite-dimensional vector space over any field: a choice of basis identifies with the space of functions such that is nonzero for only finitely many, where such a function is identified with the vector
in (the sum is finite by the assumption on, and any may be written uniquely in this way by the definition of the basis).
The dual space of may then be identified with the space ofall functions from to: a linear functional on is uniquely determined by the values it takes on the basis of, and any function (with) defines a linear functional on by
Again, the sum is finite because is nonzero for only finitely many.
The set may be identified (essentially by definition) with thedirect sum of infinitely many copies of (viewed as a 1-dimensional vector space over itself) indexed by, i.e. there are linear isomorphisms
On the other hand, is (again by definition), thedirect product of infinitely many copies of indexed by, and so the identification
is a special case of ageneral result relating direct sums (ofmodules) to direct products.
If a vector space is not finite-dimensional, then its (algebraic) dual space isalways of larger dimension (as acardinal number) than the original vector space. This is in contrast to the case of the continuous dual space, discussed below, which may beisomorphic to the original vector space even if the latter is infinite-dimensional.
The proof of this inequality between dimensions results from the following.
If is an infinite-dimensional-vector space, the arithmetical properties ofcardinal numbers implies that
where cardinalities are denoted asabsolute values. For proving that it suffices to prove that which can be done with an argument similar toCantor's diagonal argument.[9] The exact dimension of the dual is given by theErdős–Kaplansky theorem.
IfV is finite-dimensional, thenV is isomorphic toV∗. But there is in general nonatural isomorphism between these two spaces.[10] Anybilinear form on gives a mapping of into its dual space via
where the right hand side is defined as the functional onV taking each to. In other words, the bilinear form determines a linear mapping
defined by
If the bilinear form isnondegenerate, then this is an isomorphism onto a subspace ofV∗.IfV is finite-dimensional, then this is an isomorphism onto all ofV∗. Conversely, any isomorphism fromV to a subspace ofV∗ (resp., all ofV∗ ifV is finite dimensional) defines a unique nondegenerate bilinear form onV by
Thus there is a one-to-one correspondence between isomorphisms ofV to a subspace of (resp., all of)V∗ and nondegenerate bilinear forms onV.
If the vector spaceV is over thecomplex field, then sometimes it is more natural to considersesquilinear forms instead of bilinear forms.In that case, a given sesquilinear form⟨·,·⟩ determines an isomorphism ofV with thecomplex conjugate of the dual space
The conjugate of the dual space can be identified with the set of all additive complex-valued functionalsf :V →C such that
There is anaturalhomomorphism from into the double dual, defined by for all. In other words, if is the evaluation map defined by, then is defined as the map. This map is alwaysinjective;[nb 3] and it is always anisomorphism if is finite-dimensional.[11]Indeed, the isomorphism of a finite-dimensional vector space with its double dual is an archetypal example of anatural isomorphism.Infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces are not isomorphic to their algebraic double duals, but instead to their continuous double duals.
Iff :V →W is alinear map, then thetranspose (ordual)f∗ :W∗ →V∗ is defined by
for every. The resulting functional in is called thepullback of along.
The following identity holds for all and:
where the bracket [·,·] on the left is the natural pairing ofV with its dual space, and that on the right is the natural pairing ofW with its dual. This identity characterizes the transpose,[12] and is formally similar to the definition of theadjoint.
The assignmentf ↦f∗ produces aninjective linear map between the space of linear operators fromV toW and the space of linear operators fromW∗ toV∗; this homomorphism is anisomorphism if and only ifW is finite-dimensional.IfV =W then the space of linear maps is actually analgebra undercomposition of maps, and the assignment is then anantihomomorphism of algebras, meaning that(fg)∗ =g∗f∗.In the language ofcategory theory, taking the dual of vector spaces and the transpose of linear maps is therefore acontravariant functor from the category of vector spaces overF to itself.It is possible to identify (f∗)∗ withf using the natural injection into the double dual.
If the linear mapf is represented by thematrixA with respect to two bases ofV andW, thenf∗ is represented by thetranspose matrixAT with respect to the dual bases ofW∗ andV∗, hence the name.Alternatively, asf is represented byA acting on the left on column vectors,f∗ is represented by the same matrix acting on the right on row vectors.These points of view are related by the canonical inner product onRn, which identifies the space of column vectors with the dual space of row vectors.
Let be a subset of.Theannihilator of in, denoted here, is the collection of linear functionals such that for all.That is, consists of all linear functionals such that the restriction to vanishes:.Within finite dimensional vector spaces, the annihilator is dual to (isomorphic to) theorthogonal complement.
The annihilator of a subset is itself a vector space.The annihilator of the zero vector is the whole dual space:, and the annihilator of the whole space is just the zero covector:.Furthermore, the assignment of an annihilator to a subset of reverses inclusions, so that if, then
If and are two subsets of then
If is any family of subsets of indexed by belonging to some index set, then
In particular if and are subspaces of then
and[nb 3]
If is finite-dimensional and is avector subspace, then
after identifying with its image in the second dual space under the double duality isomorphism. In particular, forming the annihilator is aGalois connection on the lattice of subsets of a finite-dimensional vector space.
If is a subspace of then thequotient space is a vector space in its own right, and so has a dual. By thefirst isomorphism theorem, a functional factors through if and only if is in thekernel of. There is thus an isomorphism
As a particular consequence, if is adirect sum of two subspaces and, then is a direct sum of and.
The dual space is analogous to a "negative"-dimensional space. Most simply, since a vector can be paired with a covector by the natural pairing to obtain a scalar, a covector can "cancel" the dimension of a vector, similar toreducing a fraction. Thus while the direct sum is a-dimensional space (if is-dimensional), behaves as an-dimensional space, in the sense that its dimensions can be canceled against the dimensions of. This is formalized bytensor contraction.
This arises in physics viadimensional analysis, where the dual space has inverse units.[13] Under the natural pairing, these units cancel, and the resulting scalar value isdimensionless, as expected. For example, in (continuous)Fourier analysis, or more broadlytime–frequency analysis:[nb 4] given a one-dimensional vector space with aunit of time, the dual space has units offrequency: occurrencesper unit of time (units of). For example, if time is measured inseconds, the corresponding dual unit is theinverse second: over the course of 3 seconds, an event that occurs 2 times per second occurs a total of 6 times, corresponding to. Similarly, if the primal space measures length, the dual space measuresinverse length.
When dealing withtopological vector spaces, thecontinuous linear functionals from the space into the base field (or) are particularly important.This gives rise to the notion of the "continuous dual space" or "topological dual" which is a linear subspace of the algebraic dual space, denoted by.For anyfinite-dimensional normed vector space or topological vector space, such asEuclideann-space, the continuous dual and the algebraic dual coincide.This is however false for any infinite-dimensional normed space, as shown by the example ofdiscontinuous linear maps.Nevertheless, in the theory oftopological vector spaces the terms "continuous dual space" and "topological dual space" are often replaced by "dual space".
For atopological vector space itscontinuous dual space,[14] ortopological dual space,[15] or justdual space[14][15][16][17] (in the sense of the theory of topological vector spaces) is defined as the space of all continuous linear functionals.
Important examples for continuous dual spaces are the space of compactly supportedtest functions and its dual the space of arbitrarydistributions (generalized functions); the space of arbitrary test functions and its dual the space of compactly supported distributions; and the space of rapidly decreasing test functions theSchwartz space, and its dual the space oftempered distributions (slowly growing distributions) in the theory ofgeneralized functions.
IfX is aHausdorfftopological vector space (TVS), then the continuous dual space ofX is identical to the continuous dual space of thecompletion ofX.[1]
There is a standard construction for introducing a topology on the continuous dual of a topological vector space. Fix a collection ofbounded subsets of.This gives the topology on ofuniform convergence on sets from or what is the same thing, the topology generated byseminorms of the form
where is a continuous linear functional on, and runs over the class
This means that a net of functionals tends to a functional in if and only if
Usually (but not necessarily) the class is supposed to satisfy the following conditions:
If these requirements are fulfilled then the corresponding topology on is Hausdorff and the sets
form its local base.
Here are the three most important special cases.
If is anormed vector space (for example, aBanach space or aHilbert space) then the strong topology on is normed (in fact a Banach space if the field of scalars is complete), with the norm
Each of these three choices of topology on leads to a variant ofreflexivity property for topological vector spaces:
Let 1 <p < ∞ be a real number and consider the Banach spaceℓ p of allsequencesa = (an) for which
Define the numberq by1/p + 1/q = 1. Then the continuous dual ofℓ p is naturally identified withℓ q: given an element, the corresponding element ofℓ q is the sequence where denotes the sequence whosen-th term is 1 and all others are zero. Conversely, given an elementa = (an) ∈ℓ q, the corresponding continuous linear functional onℓ p is defined by
for allb = (bn) ∈ℓ p (seeHölder's inequality).
In a similar manner, the continuous dual ofℓ 1 is naturally identified withℓ ∞ (the space of bounded sequences).Furthermore, the continuous duals of the Banach spacesc (consisting of allconvergent sequences, with thesupremum norm) andc0 (the sequences converging to zero) are both naturally identified withℓ 1.
By theRiesz representation theorem, the continuous dual of a Hilbert space is again a Hilbert space which isanti-isomorphic to the original space.This gives rise to thebra–ket notation used by physicists in the mathematical formulation ofquantum mechanics.
By theRiesz–Markov–Kakutani representation theorem, the continuous dual of certain spaces of continuous functions can be described using measures.
IfT :V → W is a continuous linear map between two topological vector spaces, then the (continuous) transposeT′ :W′ → V′ is defined by the same formula as before:
The resulting functionalT′(φ) is inV′. The assignmentT → T′ produces a linear map between the space of continuous linear maps fromV toW and the space of linear maps fromW′ toV′.WhenT andU are composable continuous linear maps, then
WhenV andW are normed spaces, the norm of the transpose inL(W′,V′) is equal to that ofT inL(V,W).Several properties of transposition depend upon theHahn–Banach theorem.For example, the bounded linear mapT has dense rangeif and only if the transposeT′ is injective.
WhenT is acompact linear map between two Banach spacesV andW, then the transposeT′ is compact.This can be proved using theArzelà–Ascoli theorem.
WhenV is a Hilbert space, there is an antilinear isomorphismiV fromV onto its continuous dualV′.For every bounded linear mapT onV, the transpose and theadjoint operators are linked by
WhenT is a continuous linear map between two topological vector spacesV andW, then the transposeT′ is continuous whenW′ andV′ are equipped with "compatible" topologies: for example, when forX =V andX =W, both dualsX′ have thestrong topologyβ(X′,X) of uniform convergence on bounded sets ofX, or both have the weak-∗ topologyσ(X′,X) of pointwise convergence on X.The transposeT′ is continuous fromβ(W′,W) toβ(V′,V), or fromσ(W′,W) toσ(V′,V).
Assume thatW is a closed linear subspace of a normed space V, and consider the annihilator ofW inV′,
Then, the dual of the quotientV / W can be identified withW⊥, and the dual ofW can be identified with the quotientV′ / W⊥.[21]Indeed, letP denote the canonicalsurjection fromV onto the quotientV / W ; then, the transposeP′ is an isometric isomorphism from(V / W )′ intoV′, with range equal toW⊥.Ifj denotes the injection map fromW intoV, then the kernel of the transposej′ is the annihilator ofW:
and it follows from theHahn–Banach theorem thatj′ induces an isometric isomorphismV′ / W⊥ →W′.
If the dual of a normed spaceV isseparable, then so is the spaceV itself.The converse is not true: for example, the spaceℓ 1 is separable, but its dualℓ ∞ is not.

In analogy with the case of the algebraic double dual, there is always a naturally defined continuous linear operatorΨ :V →V′′ from a normed spaceV into its continuous double dualV′′, defined by
As a consequence of theHahn–Banach theorem, this map is in fact anisometry, meaning‖ Ψ(x) ‖ = ‖x ‖ for allx ∈V.Normed spaces for which the map Ψ is abijection are calledreflexive.
WhenV is atopological vector space then Ψ(x) can still be defined by the same formula, for everyx ∈V, however several difficulties arise.First, whenV is notlocally convex, the continuous dual may be equal to { 0 } and the map Ψ trivial.However, ifV isHausdorff and locally convex, the map Ψ is injective fromV to the algebraic dualV′∗ of the continuous dual, again as a consequence of the Hahn–Banach theorem.[nb 5]
Second, even in the locally convex setting, several natural vector space topologies can be defined on the continuous dualV′, so that the continuous double dualV′′ is not uniquely defined as a set. Saying that Ψ maps fromV toV′′, or in other words, that Ψ(x) is continuous onV′ for everyx ∈V, is a reasonable minimal requirement on the topology ofV′, namely that the evaluation mappings
be continuous for the chosen topology onV′. Further, there is still a choice of a topology onV′′, and continuity of Ψ depends upon this choice.As a consequence, definingreflexivity in this framework is more involved than in the normed case.
Similarly, one can define as the dual space to ...