The borough consisted of three parishes and parts of two others in the town ofDroitwich, a market town which for many centuries depended on the salt trade for its prosperity. When Droitwich's right to return MPs (which had been allowed to lapse) was restored in 1554, there was only one salt pit in the borough, and this became the basis of Droitwich's unique franchise: the right to vote was vested solely in those burgesses (members of the corporation) who owned shares in the pit giving them the right to draw brine. This was finally established by a resolution of the House of Commons in 1690; yet within a few years of this date that salt pit had dried up completely; by 1747 it was accepted that ownership of this property had no function except conferring the vote, and had to be proved by possession of the title deeds since there could be no evidence of an otherwise meaningless right which could not be exercised in practice.
Although these details of the franchise were unique to Droitwich, in practice it in many ways resembled aburgage borough, and like most of those came under the influence of a local magnate. TheFoley family, Worcestershire industrialists, controlled Droitwich from the middle of the 17th century, although they seem to have allowed the townspeople to choose one of the two members at some periods. There was no contested election between 1747 and 1832, and by the time of the Reform Act it was estimated that only 28 men had the right to vote.
In 1831, the population of the borough was 2,487, and contained 533 houses. However, the boundaries were revised by the provisions of theGreat Reform Act, taking in the rest of the town and some adjoining villages, so that the new constituency adjoined the borough ofWorcester to the south. This increased the population to 5,992, which was enough for Droitwich to retain one of its two MPs, and there were 243 voters on the register for the first election under the reformed franchise, in 1832.
There was a further slight enlargement of the boundaries to the east in 1868. However, the constituency was not big enough to keep its MP under theThird Reform Act, which came into effect at thegeneral election of 1885. The borough was abolished, but the town's name was applied to the newcounty division in which it was placed, formally calledThe Mid or Droitwich Division of Worcestershire. This was a constituency with a considerable industrial vote, including the heavy industrial town ofStourbridge and the carpet-weaving town ofStourport-on-Severn, but also contained a substantial middle-class residential population, boosted by the votes of theKidderminster freeholders (who were entitled to a vote in the county division even if they lived within theKidderminster borough boundaries), as well as agricultural interests. With a popular sittingLiberal MP turningLiberal Unionist in 1886, this was enough to keep Droitwich a relatively safe Unionist seat except in the Liberal landslide of1906.
The constituency was abolished in 1918, being divided between the redrawnKidderminster andEvesham constituencies.
Another General Election was required to take place before the end of 1915. The political parties had been making preparations for an election to take place and by July 1914, the following candidates had been selected;
^ab1557–1640, 1659, 1681:Treadway Russell Nash,History and Antiquities of the County of Worcester I (1782), introduction, xxxii.
^Winnington changed his name to Jeffreys during the Parliament of 1708–10
^Winnington was re-elected at the election of 1741 but had also been elected forWorcester, which he chose to represent, and did not sit again for Droitwich
^At the election of 1747 the returning officer made a double return, naming Thomas Foley, Francis Winnington andSamuel Masham as elected; after the consideration the Commons committee declared Winnington and Edwin Sandys (who had petitioned against the result) as the duly elected members
^Thomas Foley elected to sit for Herefordshire, replaced by Edward Foley
^Robert Harley died 15 March 1774 and replaced by Andrew Foley
