 | Review waiting, please be patient. This may take 8 weeks or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 2,845 pending submissionswaiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browseWikipedia:Featured articles andWikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevantWikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add theBiography,Astronomy, andWomen scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
| Submission declined on 29 September 2025 byTrainsandotherthings (talk). Your draft shows signs of having been generated by alarge language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browseWikipedia:Featured articles andWikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevantWikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add theBiography,Astronomy, andWomen scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |  |
Comment: We don't accept AI-generated content that simply copies existing works. The draft must be rewritten in your own words before it can be accepted. There are numerous instances of unacceptableclose paraphrasing that must be addressed.Trainsandotherthings (talk) 21:27, 29 September 2025 (UTC)TheLuxembourg Rail Protocol (formally known as theLuxembourg Protocol to the Convention on International Interests in Mobile Equipment on MattersSpecific to Railway Rolling Stock[1]) is an internationaltreaty adopted in Luxembourg on 23 February 2007. It forms part of theCape Town Treaty on International Interests in Mobile Equipment.
The Protocol extends theCape Town Treaty rules to all forms of railwayrolling stock, includinglocomotives, passenger coaches,freight wagons,metros and,trams. Its main objectives are to create legal certainty for cross-border financing, to make private financing of rail vehicles more accessible, and to reduce the risks for lenders and lessors. To achieve this, the Protocol establishes an International Registry where interests in railway rolling stock can be registered and searched online, ensures priority rules for creditors, and defines remedies in cases of debtor default or insolvency[2].
The Luxembourg Rail Protocol was developed as part of the broader Cape Town Convention system, which was designed to harmonise international secured transactions law across asset classes[3]. The Convention, adopted in 2001, created a common legal framework for the constitution and enforcement of international interests in mobile equipment, but it required industry-specific protocols to adapt its provisions to particular industries[4]. Following the adoption of theAircraft Protocol in 2001, the railway sector was identified as the next candidate for extension of the Convention’s benefits. However, as Rosen, Fleetwood and von Bodungen note[5], the Luxembourg Rail Protocol diverges significantly from the aviation model. Railway rolling stock is more diverse in type and ownership, circulates within complex national infrastructures, and lacks the unified identification and regulatory framework that characterises aircraft finance.
Negotiations on the Luxembourg Rail Protocol were conducted by theInternational Institute for the Unification of Private Law (UNIDROIT) and theIntergovernmental Organisation for International Carriage by Rail (OTIF). Technical support was provided by the Rail Working Group (RWG), a non-profit group established at UNIDROIT's request to represent the rail industry’s perspective on its adoption and implementation. The final text of the Protocol was adopted in Luxembourg in February 2007 by 42 States and 11 international organizations[6].
The entry into force followed the completion of the twelfth and final session of the Preparatory Commission. During this session, the Commission adopted the instruments that define the institutional and operational framework of the Protocol. These include procedures governing the Supervisory Authority and the International Registry[7]. The two bodies are respectively responsible for overseeing the international registration system[8] and the electronic recording and public notice of interests in railway rolling stock. Acting as Supervisory Authority, OTIF subsequently issued the certificate required under Article XII, confirming that the mechanisms provided under it were fully operational[9].
The Luxembourg Rail Protocol establishes a harmonised legal framework for asset-based financing in the rail sector.It applies to all types of railway vehicles operating on, above, or below the track, including their essential components and related data[10]. It sets out rules governing the recognition, enforcement, and prioritisation of security interests, leases, and title-reservation agreements relating to railway equipment across national borders.
The Convention and its protocols are based on five guiding principles: practicality, party autonomy, predictability, transparency, and sensitivity to national legal systems[11].These principles shape the operation of the entire regime, ensuring that it remains functional in commercial practice, adaptable to local law, and reliable for both creditors and debtors.
By creating a uniform set of creditor rights and a central electronic registry, the Protocol aims to facilitate cross-border lending, enhances the legal certainty of secured transactions, and promotes investment in railway infrastructure without requiring state guarantees[12][13].
The Protocol establishes an International Registry for railway rolling stock, based in Luxembourg and supervised byOTIF[14]. The Registry records international interests, ownership notices, and leasing rights, determining their priority according to the order of registration and providing global transparency through an online, 24-hour searchable system[15][16]. The facility is strictly limited to functions related to the Protocol and the Convention, and all users must comply with the Registry’s procedural rules[17].
The Luxembourg Rail Protocol establishes the Unique Rail Vehicle Identification System (URVIS), which assigns a permanent global identifier to each item of rolling stock. The main aims are to provide public evidence of ownership, enables lifetime tracking across borders, and helps prevent fraud by confirming the authenticity of registered assets. The URVIS number is a 16-digit code composed of 15 random digits and one check digit[18]. It is issued by the International Registry on demand, upon payment of a standard fee, and remains permanently linked to the specific vehicle. The number does not encode technical data or operational information and cannot be reassigned or modified[19]. The marking may also be accompanied by other identifiers such as the manufacturers or national serial number.
The Protocol sets out the remedies available to creditors when a debtor defaults. These include the right to repossess or sell the rolling stock, subject to any declarations by contracting states and applicable public policy. By harmonising these rules, the Protocol reduces uncertainty and helps to align the treatment of creditors across jurisdictions.
It also provides specific rules for the treatment of international interests in insolvency. Contracting states may choose among alternative regimes that determine how secured creditors are treated during insolvency proceedings[20]. Article IX of the Protocol outlines three alternatives:
-Alternative A: Requires the return of the asset to the creditor within a specified waiting period. This option is considered the most economically beneficial for the sector, as it ensures either the recovery of the asset or the debtor’s cure of defaults within a fixed timeframe.
-Alternative B: Makes repossession conditional upon a court order.
-Alternative C: Introduces a hybrid mechanism allowing a temporary judicial suspension of repossession provided that payments continue under the original financing terms.
These provisions collectively aim to overcome uncertainty regarding ownership and security interests in cases of default or insolvency. This helps ensure legal uniformity and predictability in international railway finance[21].
The Protocol was opened for signature in Luxembourg in February 2007 and entered into force on 8 March 2024[22]. Since then, several states and the European Union have signed it, and some have ratified it. As of 1 July 2025[23], the Protocol is in force for Gabon, Luxembourg, Paraguay, Spain, South Africa, Sweden and the European Union.
The European Union signed the Luxembourg Rail Protocol following aCouncil Decision on 30 November 2009, with formal endorsement on 10 December 2009[24]. It ratified the Protocol in December 2014 as a Regional Economic Integration Organization, using the same procedure.
| State | Signature | Ratification | Entry into force | Declarations or Reservations |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| European Union | 10.12.2009 | 18.12.2014 | 08.03.2024 | XXII (2) |
| France | 03.03.2017 | Not yet ratified | Awaiting entry | Not applicable |
| Gabon | 23.02.2007 | 04.04.2017 | 08.03.2024 | None |
| Germany | 21.11.2012 | Not yet ratified | Awaiting entry | Not applicable |
| Italy | 23.02.2007 | Not yet ratified | Awaiting entry | Not applicable |
| Luxembourg | 23.02.2007 | 31.01.2012 | 08.03.2024 | None |
| Mozambique | 15.11.2016 | Not yet ratified | Awaiting entry | Not applicable |
| Paraguay | 27.11.2024 | 01.03.2025 | Awaiting entry | Not applicable |
| South Africa | 22.03.2022 | 27.01.2025 | 01.05.2025 | None |
| Spain | 10.11.2012 | 20.01.2023 | 08.03.2024 | XIII, XIV (2)-(3), XXIV, XXV and XXVI, XXVII(1) |
| Sweden | 27.06.2017 | 02.07.2018 | 08.03.2024 | None |
| Switzerland | 23.02.2007 | Not yet ratified | Awaiting entry | Not applicable |
| United Kingdom | 26.02.2016 | Not yet ratified | Awaiting entry | Not applicable |
Each State that ratifies the Protocol is required to ensure that its domestic legal system gives effect to the rules of the Cape Town Convention and the Protocol. In some jurisdictions, this has required changes to property law and insolvency law to align national rules with the international framework.[26]
By reducing legal risks for lenders, the Protocol is expected to lower the cost of financing railway rolling stock[27][13][28][29]. This may particularly benefit operators in emerging markets, where access to affordable finance has traditionally been limited[12]. The creation of the International Registry and the URVIS identification system also supports more transparent asset management and the devolopment of secondary markets for rolling stock.
The impact of the Protocol depends on the pace and breadth ofratifications[30]. As of 2025, only a limited number of states have ratified, meaning that its effects are still geographically restricted. Concerns about compatibility with national insolvency laws have been raised, which may delay adoption in some jurisdictions.