Searching for a way to addressoverpopulation andglobal warming,Norwegian scientist Dr. Jørgen Asbjørnsen develops "downsizing", an irreversible process that shrinks organic material. He becomes part of the first group of human test subjects and is encouraged that the process reduces people to a height of approximately 5 inches (13 cm), drastically decreasing their consumption and waste. When the findings are revealed at a conference five years later, there is a global sensation.
Ten years later, Paul and Audrey Safranek, a financially struggling married couple inOmaha, see Dave and Carol Johnson, who have downsized, at Paul's high school reunion. Rather than the touted environmental benefits, Dave argues the real reason to downsize is that one's money goes much further when one is small. Paul and Audrey decide to undergo the procedure and move to Leisureland,New Mexico, one of the fancier communities for small individuals. In a Leisureland recovery room after the procedure, Paul receives a call from Audrey, who says she backed out at the last minute and, because they are now different sizes, is leaving him.
Because of his reduced size Paul has no choice but to take up solitary occupancy of a sprawling and luxurious mansion, previously selected by the couple using their greatly enhanced capital. Leisureland is presented as an attractive but bland consumerist enclave for the newly rich and downsized, protected by high walls and a dome.
A year later, Paul signs hisdivorce papers. Unable to afford the mansion Audrey chose, he relocates to an apartment and takes a job as a customer service representative atLands' End. He had let hisoccupational therapy license lapse, not anticipating the need to work after being shrunk. He has started dating someone, but they break up, and Paul finds himself at a wild party thrown by his shady yet charming neighbor, Dusan.
The next morning, Paul recognizes one of Dusan's house cleaners asNgoc Lan Tran, aVietnamese political activist who was jailed and downsized against her will, escaped in a television box, barely survived being shipped to the United States, and was brought to Leisureland a year ago to have her leg amputated. Wanting to assist Ngoc Lan with her prosthetic leg, Paul goes to her apartment in theslums just outside the walls of Leisureland where theservice workers of the community live. Paul had not thought about this part of the small economy, and is shocked by conditions in the slum.
At her apartment, Ngoc Lan has Paul try to help her dying friend. When she finally lets him work on her prosthetic leg, he breaks it, so, until she can get a new one, he agrees to work for her cleaning service and also help her gather food from around the city to distribute throughout the slums. Dusan, upon learning what Paul is doing, attempts to release Paul from his obligation by taking him to deliver supplies to the original colony for small people, but Ngoc Lan unexpectedly decides to tag along, as she has a standing invitation to visit Dr. Asbjørnsen, who had heard about her ordeal.
In a Norwegianfjord, Dr. Asbjørnsen and his wife board the boat piloted by Dusan's friend Joris Konrad. Dr. Asbjørnsen announces it has just been determined conclusively that, due to thepositive feedback of Antarctic methane emissions,[a] the human race will soon become extinct. Paul asks if downsizing can save humanity, but Dr. Asbjørnsen says the procedure came too late, as only three percent of the world has so far chosen to downsize. That night, Paul and Ngoc Lan have sex.
At the colony, the travelers discover that, the next day, Dr. Asbjørnsen is enacting a contingency plan: he and the other colonists are going to enter a large underground vault, and their descendants will emerge when the surface environment stabilizes in about eight thousand years. Dusan and Joris are skeptical of the cult-like plan and say the extinction will not happen for hundreds of years, while Paul is excited to enter the vault and help with this effort to ensure the future of mankind. He asks Ngoc Lan to join him, but she refuses, saying the people in need of help will be those left above ground. As the door of the vault is closing, Paul changes his mind and steps outside.
Back in Leisureland, Paul continues to work with Ngoc Lan to serve the people of the slums, deriving contentment from things like bringing dinner to an old man.
During the seven-year hiatus between the releases of their collaborationsSideways (2004) andThe Descendants (2011),Alexander Payne andJim Taylor spent two and a half years working on the script forDownsizing, which was going to be Payne's next film afterSideways until it was superseded byThe Descendants and thenNebraska (2013).[8][9] On November 5, 2014, it was officially announced thatDownsizing would be Payne's follow-up toNebraska.[10]
Payne, Taylor, andMark Johnson produced the film, whose script was co-written by Payne and Taylor.[11] On January 8, 2015, it was announced thatAnnapurna Pictures would finance and produce the film;[12] Ad Hominem Enterprises, Payne and Taylor's production company, was also involved with the production.[10]20th Century Fox was originally going to distribute the film, but it was revealed on October 2, 2015, thatParamount Pictures had acquired distribution rights.[13]
Reese Witherspoon was attached to the project in 2009, at which pointPaul Giamatti andSacha Baron Cohen were also set to star.[14] On November 5, 2014,Matt Damon was officially cast in the film, taking over Giamatti's role.[15] On January 7, 2015, it was confirmed that Witherspoon was still participating in the project, which would have been her first collaboration with Payne sinceElection (1999).[16][17] The next day, it was announced thatAlec Baldwin,Neil Patrick Harris, andJason Sudeikis had joined the cast, though Baldwin later dropped out.[18] On March 10, 2016,Christoph Waltz andHong Chau joined the film,[11] and on March 29, it was revealed thatKristen Wiig had replaced Witherspoon as Damon's character's wife.[19] In August 2016, it was announced thatMargo Martindale had been cast in a minor role.[20]
In the United States and Canada,Downsizing was released alongsideFather Figures andPitch Perfect 3, as well as the wide expansions ofThe Shape of Water andDarkest Hour, and was projected to gross $10–12 million from 2,668 theaters over its four-day opening weekend.[26] It made $2.1 million on its first day (including $425,000 from Thursday night previews) and grossed $4.95 million over its three-day opening weekend, finishing 7th at the box office. This marked the third recent domesticfinancial failure forParamount Pictures, followingMother! andSuburbicon, the latter of which also starred Matt Damon.[27] The following weekend, the film dropped 5% to $4.7 million, finishing 9th.[28]
The film grossed $24.4 million in the United States and Canada, and $30.6 million in other territories, for a total of $55 million, against a production budget of around $68 million.[2]
Onreview aggregator websiteRotten Tomatoes, the film has an approval rating of 47% based on 301 reviews, with anaverage rating of 5.70/10; the website's critical consensus reads: "Downsizing assembles a talented cast in pursuit of some truly interesting ideas – which may be enough for some audiences to forgive the final product's frustrating shortcomings."[29] OnMetacritic, the film has a weighted average score of 63 out of 100, based on 48 critics, indicating "generally favorable" reviews.[30] Audiences polled byCinemaScore gave the film an average grade of "C" on an A+ to F scale.[27]
Todd McCarthy ofThe Hollywood Reporter, who eventually named the film his best of 2017, praised it as "big and beautiful", highlighting the direction and the lead performances, and saying "this is a deeply humane film that, like the best Hollywood classics, feels both entirely of its moment and timeless. It was a risky roll of the dice, but one that hits the creative jackpot."[31] Xan Brooks ofThe Guardian gaveDownsizing five out of five stars, calling the film "Alexander Payne's miniature masterpiece".[32] Writing forRolling Stone,Peter Travers gave the film 3.5 out of 4 stars, saying that "with startling performances and special effects, director Alexander Payne's dystopian sci-fi satire brims over with the pleasures of the unexpected."[33]
Conversely, David Sims ofThe Atlantic gave the film a negative review, writing: "If Payne had landed the mix of genres,Downsizing could have been a masterpiece. Spoiler (small print not required): He does not."[34] Keith Uhlich ofSlant Magazine gave the film 1.5 out of 4 stars and said: "Payne [...] appears to think he's making some kind of grand statement. So you just sit back and marvel at how his reach continually exceeds his grasp."[35]Richard Brody ofThe New Yorker describedDownsizing as "three movies in one – a passable one, a terrific one, and a terrible one. They're unified in the realization of the movie's big idea, but the movie's straining after a big idea is its overarching weakness."[36]
^"Venezia 74, i premi collaterali".la Repubblica Venice. GEDI Gruppo Editoriale. September 8, 2017.Archived from the original on April 23, 2023. RetrievedApril 23, 2023.
