Change ofwavelength caused by motion of the sourceAn animation illustrating how the Doppler effect causes a car engine or siren to sound higher in pitch when it is approaching than when it is receding. The red circles represent sound waves.
TheDoppler effect (alsoDoppler shift) is the change in thefrequency or, equivalently, theperiod of awave in relation to an observer who is moving relative to the source of the wave.[1][2][3] It is named after the physicistChristian Doppler, who described the phenomenon in 1842. A common example of Doppler shift is the change ofpitch heard when avehicle approaches and recedes from an observer. Compared to the emitted sound, the received sound has a higher pitch during the approach, identical at the instant of passing by, and lower pitch during the recession.[4]
When the source of the sound wave is moving towards the observer, each successive cycle of the wave is emitted from a position closer to the observer than the previous cycle.[4][5] Hence, from the observer's perspective, the period or time between cycles is reduced, meaning the frequency is increased. Conversely, if the source of the sound wave is moving away from the observer, each cycle of the wave is emitted from a position farther from the observer than the previous cycle, so the period or time between successive cycles is increased, thus reducing the frequency.
For waves propagating invacuum, as is possible forelectromagnetic waves orgravitational waves, only therelative velocity between the observer and the source needs to be considered. For waves that propagate in amedium, such assound waves, thevelocity of the observer and of the source are relative to the medium in which the waves are transmitted.[3] The total Doppler effect in such cases may therefore result from motion of the source, motion of the observer, motion of the medium, or any combination thereof.
Experiment by Buys Ballot (1845) depicted on a wall inUtrecht (2019)
Doppler first proposed this effect in 1842 in his treatise "Über das farbige Licht der Doppelsterne und einiger anderer Gestirne des Himmels" (On the coloured light of thebinary stars and some other stars of the heavens).[6] The hypothesis was tested for sound waves byBuys Ballot in 1845.[p 1] He confirmed that the sound'spitch was higher than the emitted frequency when the sound source approached him, and lower than the emitted frequency when the sound source receded from him.Hippolyte Fizeau independently discovered the same phenomenon onelectromagnetic waves in 1848. In France, the effect is sometimes called "effet Doppler-Fizeau" but that name was not adopted by the rest of the world as Fizeau's discovery was six years after Doppler's proposal.[p 2][7] In Britain,John Scott Russell made an experimental study of the Doppler effect (1848).[p 3]
For relative speeds much less than the speed of light, the effects ofspecial relativity can be neglected.Then the relationship between observed frequency and emitting frequency of a wave propagating through a medium is given by:[8]where
is the propagation speed of the wave in the medium;
is the speed of the wave receiver relative to the medium. In the formula, is added to if the receiver is moving towards the source, subtracted if the receiver is moving away from the source;
is the speed of the wave source relative to the medium. is subtracted from if the source is moving towards the receiver, added if the source is moving away from the receiver.
,, and here are not vectors asvelocities, but their magnitudes asspeeds. This relationship predicts that the observed frequency by the receiver will decrease if the distance between the source and receiver is increasing. Note that the speed of the wave is determined by the medium, not by the speed of the source.
If the source approaches the observer at an angle (but still with a constant speed), the observed frequency that is first heard is higher than the object's emitted frequency. Thereafter, there is amonotonic decrease in the observed frequency as it gets closer to the observer, through equality when it is coming from a direction perpendicular to the relative motion (and was emitted at the point of closest approach; but when the wave is received, the source and observer will no longer be at their closest), and a continued monotonic decrease as it recedes from the observer. When the observer is very close to the path of the object, the transition from high to low frequency is very abrupt. When the observer is far from the path of the object, the transition from high to low frequency is gradual.
Stationary sound source produces sound waves at a constant frequencyf, and the wave-fronts propagate symmetrically away from the source at a constant speed c. The distance between wave-fronts is the wavelength. All observers will hear the same frequency, which will be equal to the actual frequency of the source wheref =f0.
The same sound source isradiating sound waves at a constant frequency in the same medium. However, now the sound source is moving with a speedυs = 0.7c. Since the source is moving, the center of each newwavefront is now slightly displaced to the right. As a result, the wave-fronts begin to bunch up on the right side (in front of) and spread further apart on the left side (behind) of the source. An observer in front of the source will hear a higher frequencyf =c + 0/c – 0.7cf0 = 3.33f0 and an observer behind the source will hear a lower frequencyf =c − 0/c + 0.7cf0 = 0.59f0.
Now the source is moving at the speed of sound in the medium (υs =c). The wave fronts in front of the source are now all bunched up at the same point. As a result, an observer in front of the source will detect nothing until the source arrives and an observer behind the source will hear a lower frequencyf =c – 0/c +cf0 = 0.5f0.
The sound source has now surpassed the speed of sound in the medium, and is traveling at 1.4c. Since the source is moving faster than the sound waves it creates, it actually leads the advancing wavefront. The sound source will pass by a stationary observer before the observer hears the sound. As a result, an observer in front of the source will detect nothing and an observer behind the source will hear a lower frequencyf =c – 0/c + 1.4cf0 = 0.42f0.
Assuming a stationary observer and a wave source moving towards the observer at (or exceeding) the speed of the wave, the Doppler equation predicts an infinite (or negative) frequency as from the observer's perspective. Thus, the Doppler equation is inapplicable for such cases. If the wave is a sound wave and the sound source is moving faster than the speed of sound, the resultingshock wave creates asonic boom.
Lord Rayleigh predicted the following effect in his classic book on sound: if the observer were moving from the (stationary) source at twice the speed of sound, a musical piecepreviously emitted by that source would be heard in correct tempo and pitch, but as if playedbackwards.[9]
Asiren on a passingemergency vehicle will start out higher than its stationary pitch, slide down as it passes, and continue lower than its stationary pitch as it recedes from the observer. AstronomerJohn Dobson explained the effect thus:
The reason the siren slides is because it doesn't hit you.
In other words, if the siren approached the observer directly, the pitch would remain constant, at a higher than stationary pitch, until the vehicle hit him, and then immediately jump to a new lower pitch. Because the vehicle passes by the observer, the radial speed does not remain constant, but instead varies as a function of the angle between his line of sight and the siren's velocity:where is the angle between the object's forward velocity and the line of sight from the object to the observer.
TheDoppler effect for electromagnetic waves such as light is of widespread use inastronomy to measure the speed at whichstars andgalaxies are approaching or receding from us, resulting in so calledblueshift orredshift, respectively. This may be used to detect if an apparently single star is, in reality, a closebinary, to measure the rotational speed of stars and galaxies, or todetect exoplanets. This effect typically happens on a very small scale; there would not be a noticeable difference in visible light to the unaided eye.[10]The use of the Doppler effect in astronomy depends on knowledge of precise frequencies ofdiscrete lines in thespectra of stars.
Among thenearby stars, the largestradial velocities with respect to theSun are +308 km/s (BD-15°4041, also known as LHS 52, 81.7 light-years away) and −260 km/s (Woolley 9722, also known as Wolf 1106 and LHS 64, 78.2 light-years away). Positive radial speed means the star is receding from the Sun, negative that it is approaching.
The relationship between theexpansion of the universe and the Doppler effect is not simply caused by the source moving away from the observer.[11][12] In cosmology, theredshift of expansion is considered separate from redshifts due to gravity or Doppler motion.[13]
Distant galaxies also exhibitpeculiar motion distinct from their cosmological recession speeds. If redshifts are used to determine distances in accordance withHubble's law, then these peculiar motions give rise toredshift-space distortions.[14]
U.S. Military Police using aradar gun, an application of Doppler radar, to catch speeding violators
The Doppler effect is used in some types ofradar to measure the velocity of detected objects. A radar beam is fired at a moving target – e.g. a motor car, as police use radar to detect speeding motorists – as it approaches to or recedes from the radar source. In the case of a car moving away from the source, each successive radar wave has to travel farther to reach the car, before being reflected and re-detected near the source. As each wave has to move farther, the gaps between the wave crests increase, increasing the wavelength of the radiation returning to the radar. In the opposite case, when the radar beam is fired at the moving car as it approaches, each successive wave travels a lesser distance, decreasing the wavelength. In either situation, calculations from the Doppler effect accurately determine the car's speed. Moreover, theproximity fuze, developed duringWorld War II, relies upon Doppler radar to detonate explosives at the correct time, height, distance, etc.[citation needed]
Bats useecholocation in a similar way to locatemoths. The Doppler shift affects the frequency of the wave incident upon the target (moth). When the wave is reflected back from the moth to the bat, the moth acts as the wave emitter and the bat as the wave receiver. The frequency of the reflected wave is again Doppler-shifted. A bat, emitting a wave at the frequency and flying at towards a moth flying at will detect a final reflected wave with a frequency:[8]: 502
Colour flow ultrasonography (Doppler) of acarotid artery – scanner and screen
Anechocardiogram can, within certain limits, produce an accurate assessment of the direction of blood flow and the velocity of blood and cardiac tissue at any arbitrary point using the Doppler effect. One of the limitations is that theultrasound beam should be as parallel to the blood flow as possible. Velocity measurements allow assessment of cardiac valve areas and function, abnormal communications between the left and right side of the heart, leaking of blood through the valves (valvular regurgitation), and calculation of thecardiac output.Contrast-enhanced ultrasound using gas-filled microbubble contrast media can be used to improve velocity or other flow-related medical measurements.[15][16]
Although "Doppler" has become synonymous with "velocity measurement" in medical imaging, in many cases it is not the frequency shift (Doppler shift) of the received signal that is measured, but the phase shift (when the received signal arrives).[p 4]
Velocity measurements of blood flow are also used in other fields ofmedical ultrasonography, such asobstetric ultrasonography andneurology. Velocity measurement of blood flow in arteries and veins based on Doppler effect is an effective tool for diagnosis of vascular problems likestenosis.[17]
Instruments such as thelaser Doppler velocimeter (LDV),Acoustic Doppler current profiler (ADCP), andacoustic Doppler velocimeter (ADV) have been developed to measure velocities in a fluid flow. The LDV emits alight beam, and the ADCP and ADV emits an ultrasonic acoustic burst, and measure the Doppler shift in wavelengths of reflections from particles moving with the flow. The actual flow is computed as a function of the water velocity and phase. This technique allows non-intrusive flow measurements, at high precision and high frequency.
Developed originally for velocity measurements in medical applications (blood flow), Ultrasonic Doppler Velocimetry (UDV) can measure in real time complete velocity profile in almost any liquids containing particles in suspension such as dust, gas bubbles, emulsions. Flows can be pulsating, oscillating, laminar or turbulent, stationary or transient. This technique is fully non-invasive.
Possible Doppler shifts in dependence of the elevation angle (LEO: orbit altitude = 750 km). Fixed ground station.[18]
Geometry for Doppler effects. Variables: is the velocity of the mobile station, is the velocity of the satellite, is the relative velocity of the satellite, is the elevation angle of the satellite and is the driving direction with respect to the satellite.
Doppler effect on the mobile channel. Variables: is the carrier frequency, is the maximum Doppler shift due to the mobile station moving (seeDoppler Spread) and is the additional Doppler shift due to the satellite moving.
Doppler also needs to be compensated insatellite communication.Fast moving satellites can have a Doppler shift of dozens of kilohertz relative to a ground station. The speed, thus magnitude of Doppler effect, changes due to earth curvature. Dynamic Doppler compensation, where the frequency of a signal is changed progressively during transmission, is used so the satellite receives a constant frequency signal.[19] After realizing that the Doppler shift had not been considered before launch of theHuygens probe of the 2005Cassini–Huygens mission, the probe trajectory was altered to approachTitan in such a way that its transmissions traveled perpendicular to its direction of motion relative to Cassini, greatly reducing the Doppler shift.[20]
Doppler shift of the direct path can be estimated by the following formula:[21]where is the speed of the mobile station, is the wavelength of the carrier, is the elevation angle of the satellite and is the driving direction with respect to the satellite.
The additional Doppler shift due to the satellite moving can be described as:where is the relative speed of the satellite.
TheLeslie speaker, most commonly associated with and predominantly used with the famousHammond organ, takes advantage of the Doppler effect by using an electric motor to rotate an acoustic horn around a loudspeaker, sending its sound in a circle. This results at the listener's ear in rapidly fluctuating frequencies of a keyboard note.
Alaser Doppler vibrometer (LDV) is a non-contact instrument for measuring vibration. The laser beam from the LDV is directed at the surface of interest, and the vibration amplitude and frequency are extracted from the Doppler shift of the laser beam frequency due to the motion of the surface.
Dynamic real-time path planning in robotics to aid the movement of robots in a sophisticated environment with moving obstacles often take help of Doppler effect.[22] Such applications are specially used for competitive robotics where the environment is constantly changing, such as robosoccer.
Since 1968 scientists such asVictor Veselago have speculated about the possibility of an inverse Doppler effect. The size of the Doppler shift depends on therefractive index of the medium a wave is traveling through. Some materials are capable ofnegative refraction, which should lead to a Doppler shift that works in a direction opposite that of a conventional Doppler shift.[23] The first experiment that detected this effect was conducted by Nigel Seddon and Trevor Bearpark inBristol,United Kingdom in 2003.[24] Later, the inverse Doppler effect was observed in some inhomogeneous materials, and predicted inside aVavilov–Cherenkov cone.[25]
^Fizeau: "Acoustique et optique".Lecture,Société Philomathique de Paris, 29 December 1848. According to Becker(pg. 109), this was never published, but recounted by M. Moigno(1850): "Répertoire d'optique moderne" (in French), vol 3. pp 1165–1203 and later in full by Fizeau, "Des effets du mouvement sur le ton des vibrations sonores et sur la longeur d'onde des rayons de lumière"; [Paris, 1870].Annales de Chimie et de Physique, 19, 211–221.
^Alec EdenThe search for Christian Doppler, Springer-Verlag, Wien 1992. Contains a facsimile edition with anEnglish translation.
^Becker (2011). Barbara J. Becker,Unravelling Starlight: William and Margaret Huggins and the Rise of the New Astronomy, illustrated Edition,Cambridge University Press, 2011;ISBN110700229X, 9781107002296.
^Davies, MJ; Newton, JD (2 July 2017). "Non-invasive imaging in cardiology for the generalist".British Journal of Hospital Medicine.78 (7):392–398.doi:10.12968/hmed.2017.78.7.392.PMID28692375.
^Evans, D. H.; McDicken, W. N. (2000).Doppler Ultrasound (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley and Sons.ISBN978-0-471-97001-9.[page needed]
^Otilia Popescuy, Jason S. Harrisz and Dimitrie C. Popescuz, "Designing the Communication Sub-System for Nanosatellite CubeSat Missions: Operational and Implementation Perspectives", 2016, IEEE
^Arndt, D. (2015). On Channel Modelling for Land Mobile Satellite Reception (Doctoral dissertation).
^Agarwal, Saurabh; Gaurav, Ashish Kumar; Nirala, Mehul Kumar; Sinha, Sayan (2018). "Potential and Sampling Based RRT Star for Real-Time Dynamic Motion Planning Accounting for Momentum in Cost Function".Neural Information Processing. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Vol. 11307. pp. 209–221.doi:10.1007/978-3-030-04239-4_19.ISBN978-3-030-04238-7.
Doppler, C. (1842).Über das farbige Licht der Doppelsterne und einiger anderer Gestirne des Himmels (About the coloured light of the binary stars and some other stars of the heavens). Publisher: Abhandlungen der Königl. Böhm. Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften (V. Folge, Bd. 2, S. 465–482) [Proceedings of the Royal Bohemian Society of Sciences (Part V, Vol 2)]; Prague: 1842 (Reissued 1903). Some sources mention 1843 as year of publication because in that year the article was published in the Proceedings of the Bohemian Society of Sciences. Doppler himself referred to the publication as "Prag 1842 bei Borrosch und André", because in 1842 he had a preliminary edition printed that he distributed independently.
"Doppler and the Doppler effect", E. N. da C. Andrade,Endeavour Vol. XVIII No. 69, January 1959 (published by ICI London). Historical account of Doppler's original paper and subsequent developments.
David Nolte (2020). "The fall and rise of the Doppler effect.Physics Today, v. 73, pp. 31–35.DOI: 10.1063/PT.3.4429
