Adogma of the Catholic Church is defined as "a truth revealed byGod, which themagisterium of the Church declared as binding".[1] TheCatechism of the Catholic Church states:
The Church's Magisterium asserts that it exercises the authority it holds fromChrist to the fullest extent when it defines dogmas, that is, when it proposes, in a form obliging Catholics to an irrevocable adherence of faith, truths contained in divineRevelation or also when it proposes, in a definitive way, truths having a necessary connection with these.[2]
The faithful are only required to accept a teaching as dogma if the Catholic Church clearly and specifically identifies them as dogmas.[1]
The concept of dogma has two elements: 1) thepublic revelation of God, which isdivine revelation as contained insacred scripture (the written word) andsacred tradition, and 2) a proposition of the Catholic Church, which not only announces the dogma but also declares it binding for the faith. This may occur through anex cathedra decision by aPope, or by a definitive statement made by anEcumenical Council.[3] Truths formally and explicitly revealed by God are dogmas in the strict sense when they are proposed or defined by the church, such as the articles of theNicene Creed which are drawn from the early church councils.[4] Catholicism holds that the understanding of scripture continues to deepen and mature over time through the action of theHoly Spirit in the history of the church and in the understanding of that faith by Christians, all the while staying identical in essence and substance.[5]Dei verbum states: "both sacred tradition and Sacred Scripture are to be accepted and venerated with the same sense of loyalty and reverence".[5]
 |
| Part ofa series on the |
| Catholic Church |
|---|
 St. Peter's Basilica, Vatican City |
| Overview |
Miscellaneous |
Links and resources |
 Catholic Church portal |
A dogma implies a twofold relation: todivine revelation and to the authoritative teaching of the Catholic Church.[4]
A dogma's "strict signification is the object of bothDivine Faith (Fides Divina) and Catholic Faith (Fides Catholica); it is the object of the Divine Faith (Fides Divina) by reason of its Divine Revelation; it is the object of Catholic Faith (Fides Catholica) on account of its infallible doctrinal definition by the Church. If abaptised person deliberately denies or doubts a dogma properly so-called, he is guilty of thesin ofheresy [...], andautomatically becomes subject to thepunishment ofexcommunication".[6]
At the turn of the 20th century, a group of theologians calledmodernists stated that dogmas did not come from God but are historical manifestations at a given time. In the encyclicalPascendi dominici gregis,Pope Pius X condemned this teaching in 1907. The Catholic position is that the content of a dogma has a divine origin, that is that said content is considered to be an expression of anobjective truth that does not change.[7]
However, truths of the faith have been declared dogmatically throughout the ages. The instance of a Pope doing this outside an Ecumenical Council is rare, though there were two instances in recent times: theImmaculate Conception of Mary in 1854 and theAssumption of Mary into heaven in 1950. BothPope Pius IX andPope Pius XII consulted the bishops worldwide before proclaiming these dogmas. A movement to declare a fifthMarian dogma for "Mediatrix" and "Co-Redemptrix" was underway in the 1990s,[8] but had been opposed by thebishops atVatican II and has faced strong opposition since.[9][10]
The termDogma Catholicum was first used byVincent of Lérins (450), referring to "what all, everywhere and always believed".[11] In the year 565,Emperor Justinian declared the decisions of the first ecumenical councils as law "because they are true dogmata" ofGod.[11]
Ecumenical Councils issue dogmas. Many dogmas – especially from theearly Church (Ephesus,Chalcedon) to theCouncil of Trent – were formulated against specificheresies. Later dogmas (Immaculate Conception andAssumption of Mary) express the greatness of God in binding language. At the specific request ofPope John XXIII, the Second Vatican Council did not proclaim any dogmas. Instead it presented the basic elements of the Catholic faith in a more understandable, pastoral language.[12] The last two dogmas were pronounced by Popes,Pope Pius IX in 1854 andPope Pius XII in 1950, on the Immaculate Conception and the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary respectively.
It is Catholic teaching that, with Christ and the Apostles, revelation was complete. Dogmas issued after the death of his apostles are not new, but explications of existing faith. Implicit truths are specified as explicit, as was done in the teachings on theTrinity by the ecumenical councils.Karl Rahner tries to explain this with the allegorical sentence of a husband to his wife, "I love you"; this surely implies, I am faithful to you.[13] In the 5th centuryVincent of Lérins wrote, inCommonitory, that there should be progress within the church,
on condition that it be real progress, not alteration of the faith. For progress requires that the subject be enlarged in itself, alteration, that it be transformed into something else. The intelligence, then, the knowledge, the wisdom, [...] of individuals [...] as well of [...] the whole Church, ought, in the course of ages and centuries, to increase and make much and vigorous progress; but yet only in its own kind; that is to say, in the same doctrine, in the same sense, and in the same meaning.[14]
Vincent commented on theFirst Epistle to Timothy (6:20) that Timothy, for Vincent, represented "either generally the Universal Church, or in particular, the whole body of The Prelacy", whose obligation is "to possess or to communicate to others a complete knowledge of religion" called the deposit of faith. According to Vincent, the deposit of faith was entrusted and not "devised: a matter not of wit, but of learning; not of private adoption, but of public tradition." Vincent expounded that you "received gold, give gold in turn," and not a substitute or a counterfeit. Vincent explained that those who are qualified by a "divine gift" should "by wit, by skill, by learning" expound and clarify "that which formerly was believed, though imperfectly apprehended" – to understand "what antiquity venerated without understanding" and teach "the same truths" in a new way.[15] The church uses this text in its interpretation of dogmatic development. In 1870, theFirst Vatican Council quoted fromCommonitory and stated, in the dogmatic constitutionDei Filius, that "meaning of the sacred dogmas is perpetually to be retained" once they have been declared by the Catholic Church and "there must never be a deviation from that meaning on the specious ground and title of a more profound understanding."[16][17] In 1964, the Second Vatican Council further developed this inLumen Gentium.[18][a]
According to Catholic theologianLudwig Ott:[19]
Dogmas are classified:
a)According to their content as: General Dogmas (dogmata generalia) and Special Dogmas (dogmata specialia). To the former belong the fundamental truths of Christianity, to the latter the individual truths contained therein.
b)According to their relation with Reason as: Pure Dogmas (dogmata pura) and Mixed Dogmas (dogmata mixta). The former we know solely throughDivine Revelation, e.g., TheTrinity (mysteries), the latter byNatural Reason also, e.g., TheExistence of God.
c)According to the mode by which the Church proposes them, as: Formal Dogmas (dogmata formalia) and Material Dogmas (dogmata materialia). The former are proposed for belief by the Teaching Authority of the Church as truths ofRevelation; the latter are not so proposed, for which reason they are not Dogmas in the strict sense.
d)According to their relation withsalvation as: Necessary Dogmas (dogmata necessaria) and Non-necessary Dogmas (dogmata non-necessaria). The former must be explicitly believed by all in order to achieve eternal salvation; for the latter implicit faith (fides implicita) suffices (cf.Hebr. II, 6).
The magisterium of the church is directed to guard, preserve and teach divine truths which God has revealed withinfallibility (de fide). A rejection of church magisterial teachings is ade facto rejection of the divine revelation. It is considered themortal sin ofheresy if the heretical opinion is held with full knowledge of the church's opposing dogmas. The infallibility of the magisterium extends also to teachings which are deduced from such truths (fides ecclesiastica). These church teachings or "Catholic truths" (veritates catholicae) are not a part of the divine revelation, yet are intimately related to it. The rejection of these "secondary" teachings is heretical, and entails loss of full communion with the Catholic Church.[20] More degrees of theological certainty exist. Those different degrees are calledtheological notes.[21]
TheCouncil of Trent made a number of dogmatic definitions about the sacraments and other beliefs and practices of the church, such as the following:
Pope Pius XII stated inHumani generis that papal encyclicals, even when they are notex cathedra, can nonetheless be sufficiently authoritative to end theological debate on a particular question:
Nor must it be thought that what is expounded in Encyclical Letters does not of itself demand consent, since in writing such Letters the Popes do not exercise the supreme power of their Teaching Authority. For these matters are taught with the ordinary teaching authority, of which it is true to say: "He who heareth you, heareth me" (Luke 10:16); and generally what is expounded and inculcated in Encyclical Letters already for other reasons appertains to Catholic doctrine. But if the Supreme Pontiffs in their official documents purposely pass judgment on a matter up to that time under dispute, it is obvious that that matter, according to the mind and will of the Pontiffs, cannot be any longer considered a question open to discussion among theologians.[34]
The end of the theological debate is not identical, however, with dogmatization. Throughout the history of the church, its representatives have discussed whether a given papal teaching is the final word or not.
In 1773,Lorenzo Ricci, hearing rumours thatPope Clement XIV might dissolve theJesuit Order, wrote "it is most incredible that the Deputy of Christ would state the opposite, what his predecessorPope Clement XIII stated in the papal bullApostolicum, in which he defended and protected us." When, a few days later, he was asked if he would accept the papal brief reverting Clement XIII and dissolving the Jesuit Order, Ricci replied that whatever the Pope decides must be sacred to everybody.[35]
In 1995, questions arose as to whether theapostolic letterOrdinatio sacerdotalis, which upheld the Catholic teaching that only men may receive ordination, is to be understood as belonging to the deposit of faith.Pope John Paul II wrote, "Wherefore, in order that all doubt may be removed regarding a matter of great importance, a matter which pertains to the Church's divine constitution itself, in virtue of Our ministry of confirming the brethren (cf. Lk 22:32) We declare that the Church has no authority whatsoever to confer priestly ordination on women and that this judgment is to be definitively held by all the Church's faithful." Dulles[which?], in a lecture to U.S. bishops, stated that 'Ordinatio sacerdotalis is infallible, not because of the apostolic letter or the clarification by CardinalJoseph Ratzinger alone but because it is based on a wide range of sources, scriptures, the constant tradition of the church, and the ordinary and universal magisterium of the church: Pope John Paul II identified a truth infallibly taught over two thousand years by the church.[36]
Critics ofOrdinatio Sacerdotalis point out, though, that it was not promulgated under theextraordinary papal magisterium as anex cathedra statement, and therefore is not consideredinfallible in itself.[36]
Private revelations have taken place within the Catholic Church since the very beginning. For example, the account ofOur Lady of the Pillar appearing toJames the Greater. However, apparitions are not a part of sacred tradition, since that would implydivine revelation is incomplete, which in turn would imply God can perfect himself.[b]
The Catholic Church distinguishes between the apparitions within divine revelation – such as the risen Jesus' apparitions to the Apostles and the sign of the woman in theBook of Revelation – and apparitions without divine revelation – such asOur Lady of Lourdes andOur Lady of Fatima – because the age of divine revelation was closed with the completion of the New Testament when the last of the Apostles died.[c]
WhileOur Lady of the Pillar appeared during theApostolic Age, the apparition is not a dogma since it is not part of theCatholic faith, in theBible or in sacred tradition. It is a local tradition, which is distinct from sacred tradition.[d]
Protestant theology since the reformation was largely negative on the termdogma. This changed in the 20th century, whenKarl Barth in his bookKirchliche Dogmatik stated the need for systematic and binding articles of faith.[40]
TheCreed is the most comprehensive – but not complete[e] – summary of important Catholic dogmas (it was originally used during baptism ceremonies). The Creed is a part ofSunday liturgy. Because many Protestant Churches have retained the older versions of the Creed, ecumenical working groups are meeting to discuss the Creed as the basis for better understandings of dogma.[41]
This article incorporates text from this source, which is in thepublic domain.
This article incorporates text from a publication now in thepublic domain: Herbermann, Charles, ed. (1913). "Dogma".Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company. One or more of the preceding sentences incorporates text from this source, which is in thepublic domain:Vincent of Lérins; Charles A. Heurtley, trans. (1955) [1894 by various publishers]. "TheCommonitory of Vincent of Lérins, for the antiquity and universality of the catholic faith against the profane novelties of all heresies". InSchaff, Philip;Wace, Henry (eds.).Sulpitius Severus, Vincent of Lerins, John Cassian. A select library of the Nicene and post-Nicene fathers of the Christian Church. Second series. Vol. 11 (Reprint ed.). Grand Rapids: B. Eerdmans.OCLC 16266414 – viaChristian Classics Ethereal Library.
