| Doel Nuclear Power Station | |
|---|---|
 Doel nuclear power station, viewed from the north | |
 | |
| Official name | Kerncentrale Doel (KCD) |
| Country | Belgium |
| Location | Doel,East Flanders |
| Coordinates | 51°19′29″N04°15′31″E / 51.32472°N 4.25861°E /51.32472; 4.25861 |
| Status | Operational |
| Construction began | July 1969 (1969-07) (Doel 1) |
| Commission date | 15 February 1975 (1975-02-15) (Doel 1) |
| Owners | Electrabel,EDF Luminus |
| Operator | Electrabel |
| Nuclear power station | |
| Reactor type | PWR |
| Reactor supplier | ACECOWEN FRAMACEC |
| Cooling towers | 2 |
| Cooling source | Scheldt river |
| Thermal capacity | 2 ×1312 MWt 1 ×3064 MWt 1 ×3000 MWt |
| Power generation | |
| Units operational | 1 x 466 MW (gross) 1 x 1090 MW (gross) |
| Units cancelled | 1 |
| Units decommissioned | 1 x 1056 MW (gross) 1 x 466 MW (gross) |
| Nameplate capacity | 1,484MW |
| Capacity factor | 91.8% (2021) |
| Annual net output | 44.12 (2021) |
| External links | |
| Website | Doel Nuclear Power Station |
| Commons | Related media on Commons |
TheDoel Nuclear Power Station is one of twonuclear power plants inBelgium. The plant includes four reactors. The site is located on the bank of theScheldt river, near the village ofDoel in theFlemishprovince ofEast Flanders, on the outskirts of the city ofAntwerp. The station is operated and majority-owned byvertically-integrated French energy corporationEngie SA through its 100%-owned Belgian subsidiaryElectrabel.EDF Luminus has a 10.2% stake in the two newest units. The Doel plant employs 963 workers and covers an area of 80 hectares (200 acres). The plant represents about 15% ofBelgium's total electricity production capacity[1] and 30% of the total electricity generation.[2] Nuclear energy typically provides half of Belgium's domestically-generated electricity and is the country's lowest-cost source of power.[3]
The station is located in the mostdensely populated area for any nuclear power station inEurope as of 2011, with 9 million inhabitants within a radius of 75 kilometres (47 mi).[4][5][6]
The power station was built by public utility EBES (Sociétés Réunies d'Energie du Bassin de l'Escaut), which in 1990 merged withIntercom andUnerg to become Electrabel. The plant was designed by the Belgian engineering firm Tractebel. Doel 1 and 2 are twin units that entered commercial operation in 1975. Doel 3 entered commercial operation in 1982 and Doel 4 in 1985. Doel 1, 2 and 4 were constructed by the ACECOWEN (ACEC-Cockerill-Westinghouse)consortium. While Doel 3 was constructed by FRAMACEC (Framatome-ACEC-Cockerill).[7]
Earthworks for Doel 5, a 1400 MW reactor also known as N8 (8th nuclear reactor in Belgium), were stopped in 1988. Participation in the French twin plant inChooz continued. French industry was compensated for already ordered components.[8]
The plant consists of four second-generationpressurized water reactors with a total net capacity of 2,925 MWe, smaller than Belgium's other nuclear power plant atTihange.[9] Its four units are rated as follows:[3]
| Reactor [9][10] | Loops | Supplier | Thermal power | Gross power | Net power | Start of construction | First criticality | Grid connection | Commercial operation | Licensed until |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Doel 1 | 2 | ACECOWEN | 1312 MW | 466 MW | 445 MW | 1 July 1969 | 18 July 1974 | 28 August 1974 | 15 February 1975 | 14 February 2025[11] |
| Doel 2 | 2 | ACECOWEN | 1312 MW | 466 MW | 445 MW | 1 September 1971 | 4 August 1975 | 21 August 1975 | 1 December 1975 | 2025 |
| Doel 3 | 3 | FRAMACEC | 3064 MW | 1056 MW | 1006 MW | 1 January 1975 | 14 June 1982 | 23 June 1982 | 1 October 1982 | 2022 |
| Doel 4 | 3 | ACECOWEN | 3000 MW | 1090 MW | 1039 MW | 1 December 1978 | 31 March 1985 | 8 April 1985 | 1 July 1985 | 2035[12] |
The design of the plant is reviewed completely every ten years through a TJH (tienjaarlijkse herziening), a legal obligation imposed by the Belgian state and the operation licence of the plant. The purpose of the review is to update the plant to the most recent international safety standards.[13]
Various weather conditions have been analysed includingrain,seiches,tsunamis,floods,earthquakes,wind,tornados,lightning,snow,hail, extreme temperatures,cyclones,sandstorms andwaterspouts.[14]
Since the design of Doel 3 and 4 and the first TJH of Doel 1 and 2[14]: 50 the reactors were designed to be subject to earthquakes such as theRichter scale 5.6 Zulzeke-Nukerke quake in 1938. At a distance of 75 km to theepicentre, this is the most significant historical earthquake for Doel. The earthquake resulted in horizontal ground accelerations of up to 0.058g[14]: 51 and formed the design base for Doel 1 and 2. Doel 3 and 4 were designed for peak ground accelerations of 0.1g.[14]: 50 After theFukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster probabilistic safety studies performed by theRoyal Observatory of Belgium predicted an earthquake with peak ground acceleration of up to 0.081g every 10,000 years.[14]: 52 The design was subsequently analysed for earthquakes up to 0.17g,[14]: 70 which is equivalent to a 1 in 100,000 year earthquake.[14]: 48
The Doel plant was originally designed for a 10,000 year flood of 9.13 m TAW (Tweede Algemene Waterpassing).[14]: 90 The highest measured level was 8.10 m TAW during theNorth Sea flood of 1953.[14]: 78 The site was filled to 8.86 m TAW during construction and fitted with aseadyke of 12.08 m TAW. The other dykes around the site have a height of 11 m TAW.[14]: 20 Probabilistic studies performed after Fukushima showed the height of a 10,000 year flood had slightly increased to 9.35 m TAW, 22 cm higher than the studies performed in the 1960s.[14]: 91 The highest possibletsunami is lower than 0.5 m.[14]: 77 During post-Fukushima stress tests a dyke failure with a water level of 10.2 m was simulated. Due to the presence of bulkheads and pedestals in the buildings no safety functions were endangered.[14]: 98–108
Besides regular primary level safety systems, in common with most nuclear power plants in the world, Doel has secondary level safety systems that can autonomously keep the power plant safe during large external accidents such as the crash of an aircraft, external explosions or loss of the primary level.[14]: 30 [14]: 14 The primary level systems have a redundancy of three or four times.: 26–29 The secondary level systems are 2x100% or 3x50%.[14]: 30–33 and have their own heatsink separate from the primary heatsink, theScheldt river. Doel 1 and 2 have aircoolers[14]: 32 while Doel 3 and 4 have three separate artificial cooling ponds.[14]: 33
Nuclear plants are designed with multiple physical barriers to prevent fission products escaping into the environment. In the case of apressurized water reactor there are three barriers: the fuel cladding which surround the fuel pellets, the primary circuit which houses the fuel rods and finally thecontainment building in which the primary circuit is built. In Belgium it was decided to add an extra double containment barrier.[15] The primary containment, a steel sphere in Doel 1 and 2 and a pre-stressed concrete cylinder with steel liner in Doel 3 and 4, is surrounded by a secondary containment made of 1.2 to 1.3 m thick reinforced concrete. The space between both containments is kept at sub-atmospheric pressure and filters are used to filter potential leaks of the primary containment.[14]: 14
In answer to a question ofdie Grünen in theBundestag, the German parliament, the German government replied that the Belgian nuclear power plants do not havefiltered containment venting systems installed. In German nuclear reactors these were already built in after theChernobyl disaster in 1986. Other countries followed this example, latest after theFukushima nuclear disaster. This kind of system allows for the containment pressure to be relieved in the event of a severe accident. The non-condensible gases that cause pressure within containment to rise are released through a stack (or chimney) via a filtration system that removes large quantities of fission products from the effluent.[16][17]
As part of the stress tests following the Fukushima incident, this issue had already been identified to be included in the stress-test action plan (BEST). Construction of containment filter venting systems at Doel 3 and 4 was completed in 2017, with Doel 1 and 2 scheduled to be operational in 2020.[18][19]
Every reactor has at least one steam drivenfeedwater pump which can supply the steam generators with water to cool down the reactor. These turbine driven pumps can cool down the plant even when no electrical power is available to power the motor driven feedwater pumps during a station blackout like theFukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster.[14]: 147 In aboiling water reactor, like those in Fukushima, the heat removal capacity of the pumps is limited as the steam that drives the turbines is radioactive and thus has to be stored.[20] This is not the case with a PWR due to the use of steam generators. Steam can simply be removed via achimney. Water supplies on site are sufficient to keep the plant safe for dozens of days.[14]: 147
While Unit 1 and 2 have no cooling towers, Unit 3 has one 169.48 metres tall and Unit 4 has one 172.61 metres tall. The latter is the tallest cooling tower in Belgium.
Light and intermediate level waste, which represents 99% of the volume of waste,[21] is treated on site in the WAB (Water and Waste Treatment Building).[22] Category A waste with half lives of less than 30 years is transported to Belgoprocess inDessel for surface disposal.[23]
High level waste was originally recycled toMOX fuel, and re-used in the Doel 3 reactor. In 1993, the Belgian federal government placed amoratorium on thereprocessing activities in order to research other options.[24] Pending further decisions regarding the moratorium, spent fuel was stored on site indry cask storage.Final disposal of the waste is being researched at the HADES underground laboratory 225m deep in the Boom Clay.[25]Nuclear transmutation of the waste is also being researched with theMYRRHA project.
In October 2013,NIRAS suspended Electrabel's licence to treat two types of waste, concentrate andresins, after foam was discovered on previously treated waste due to analkali–silica reaction. Electrabel has started a licensing procedure to use the process used in Tihange to process future waste. This process can take up to two years and in the meantime the waste in question is stored on site.[26]
There has been oneINES-2 incident on theInternational Nuclear Event Scale. After the replacement of an auxiliary feedwater turbopump, during the 2009 outage, one of the threefeedwater pumps of the first level was adjusted to a lower level of rotational speed, delivering insufficient flow rates during certain circumstances.[27][28] The two other first level feedwater pumps and three second level feedwater pumps were still available. The incident was rated 2 on the scale rather than 1 because the "Federal Agency for Nuclear Control felt that Electrabel waited a little too long to report the incident".[29]
In June 2012 Doel 3 was shut down for its third scheduled 10-year in-service inspection.Ultrasound inspections revealed a number of cracks in the lowest forged ring of the reactor pressure vessel. The cracks were determined to be an original manufacturing defect, not related totension, and theoretically of no risk.[30][31][32][33]
The reactor remained offline for further inspections and assessment for a year. Eventually the nuclear regulator judged short-term safety concerns initially raised had been solved in a satisfactory manner and that the reactor could operate safely, and it was restarted in June 2013.[34][35]
In August 2014, there was a major incident in the non-nuclear part of the plant. The main turbine overheated while operating without oil. A valve had been deliberately opened, which rapidly evacuated 65,000 litres of oil to an underground storage tank. The procedure was normally used in case of fire. The valve was normally secured by a padlock.[36] Authorities and the plant operator suspected an act of deliberate sabotage. The unit was eventually back on grid by 19 December 2014. Combined with the outage of Doel 3 and Tihange 2, blackouts were not ruled out for the winter period of 2014–2015.[37]
In December 2016, Electrabel requested that the justice department in Brussels prolong the search for the perpetrator of the turbine sabotage. Repairs cost more than 100 million euros.[38]
The power plant has twoelectrical substations. Two transmission lines run toZandvliet andKallo from the 150 kV station. The 380 kV station has three lines toAvelgem, Mercator inKruibeke and Zandvliet.Elia is thetransmission system operator.[39]
The line to Zandvliet crosses the Scheldt River using one of the highesttransmission towers in Europe. The tower is 170 metres (560 ft) high and built on acaisson in the middle of the river. The line is part of the interconnection between the Dutch and Belgian grids.
With a height of 169 metres(554 feet),[40] the twocooling towers are the most visible structures in thePort of Antwerp. Due to their proximity to theDutch-Belgian border, the towers and the accompanying wet steam can be seen over large areas of theDutch provinces ofZeeland and westernNorth Brabant. Since early 1996, one of the cooling towers has hosted a nest ofperegrine falcons.[41]
On 15 March 2016, thefederal government of Belgium decided 140 soldiers would guard the nuclear sites and that Electrabel should cover the costs.[42] In late 2015 it had already been decided that a specially trained department of thefederal police would guard the nuclear sites.[43]After the2016 Brussels bombings, on 22 March the nuclear powerplants of Doel andTihange were preventively evacuated, the standard procedure when the threat level in Belgium reaches Level 4. The powerplants continued running with minimal staff.[44]
Belgian municipalityBeveren | |
|---|---|
| Deelgemeentes | |
| Other settlements | |
| Buildings | |
