Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

The dismal science

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected fromDismal Science)
Derogatory name for economics
Thomas Carlyle (1854)
Part ofa series on
Critique of political economy

"The dismal science" is a derogatory name for the science ofeconomics, coined by Scottish essayistThomas Carlyle in 1849.[1] It contrasts with "the gay science", a then-current name for poetry.

Origin

[edit]

The phrase first appeared in "Occasional Discourse on the Negro Question" (1849), in which Carlyle claimed thatemancipation had wrecked the economy of theWest Indies by putting blacks in a position to demand unaffordable wages, thus depriving plantation owners of their labour supply. He argued for a return to some kind of forced labour system, albeit one more just than slavery. Economists of the time, following the principle ofsupply and demand, claimed that the labour problem could be resolved by opening the West Indies to African immigration, but Carlyle viewed this proposal with scorn, believing that it would lead to the development of "black Irelands" (i.e. impoverished, overpopulated islands liable to suffer terrible famines whenever crops failed). His contempt both for economists and the "Exeter Hall philanthropists" who had spearheaded emancipation moved him to write:

Truly, my philanthropic friends, Exeter Hall Philanthropy is wonderful; and theSocial Science—not a "gay science", but a rueful—which finds the secret of this universe in "supply-and-demand", and reduces the duty of human governors to that ofletting men alone, is also wonderful. Not a "gay science", I should say, like some we have heard of; no, a dreary, desolate and, indeed, quite abject and distressing one; what we might call, by way of eminence, thedismal science.[2]

Carlyle had expressed similar sentiments regarding the theories ofMalthus inChartism (1840):

The controversies on Malthus and the "Population Principle", "Preventive check" and so forth, with which the public ear has been deafened for a long while, are indeed sufficiently mournful. Dreary, stolid, dismal, without hope for this world or the next, is all that of the preventive check and the denial of the preventive check.[3]

Amongst those who were influenced by Carlyle's assessment wasJohn Ruskin, who wrote that Carlyle had "led the way" for his own critique of political economy inUnto This Last (1860).[4]

Beyond Carlyle

[edit]

Many at the time and afterward have understood the phrase in relation to the grim predictions drawn from the principles of 19th-centurypolitical economy.[5] According to Humphry House:[6]

Carlyle's phrase, "the dismal science", has been so often quoted, that there is a risk of thinking that the opinion behind it was confined to him and his followers; but the opinion was widespread, and thought to be a justifiable inference from the works of the economists: "No one", saidJ. E. Cairnes, "can have studied political economy in the works of its earlier cultivators without being struck with the dreariness of the outlook which, in the main, it discloses for the human race. It seems to have beenRicardo's deliberate opinion that a substantial improvement in the condition of the mass of mankind was impossible." It is not merely that the Malthusian principle of population and the doctrine that wages must normally and necessarily fall to the minimum point were gladly accepted by wicked exploiters as the justification of their profits; but thousands whose immediate interests were not touched by these beliefs found it difficult to avoid them. [...] Malthus hung over England like a cloud. It is difficult now to realize what it meant to thousands of good and sensible men that they believed his principle of population to be exactly true—believed that as poverty was relieved and the standard of life raised, so surely there would be bred a new race hovering on the misery-line, on the edge of starvation. However they might wish it false, they feared it true[.]

In modern discourse, the term can refer to the fact that economics invariably involves the study ofscarcity, conflict, and trade-offs, leading to conclusions and policy recommendations that may highlight limitations and negative aspects of human behavior and societal organization.[7]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^"dismal".5.a..Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press.doi:10.1093/OED/2671239493. Retrieved12 August 2025. (Subscription orparticipating institution membership required.)
  2. ^Carlyle, Thomas (1849)."Occasional Discourse on the Negro Question",Fraser's Magazine for Town and Country, Vol. XL., p. 670-679.
  3. ^Carlyle, Thomas (1840).Chartism. London: James Fraser. p. 109.
  4. ^Ruskin, John (1905).Cook, E. T.; Wedderburn, Alexander (eds.).Unto this Last, Munera Pulveris and Time and Tide with other writings on Political Economy (1860-1873)(PDF). The Complete Works of John Ruskin. Vol. XVII. London: George Allen. pp. xxxiv.
  5. ^Thompson, Derek (2013-12-17)."Why Economics Is Really Called 'the Dismal Science'".The Atlantic. Retrieved2022-07-17.
  6. ^The Dickens World, Second Edition, Oxford Paperbacks, Oxford University Press, 1960 (1942), pp. 70-71, 75.
  7. ^The Economist,Intelligent design, published 18 October 2007, accessed 15 July 2024: "...mechanism design is a hugely important area of economics, and underpins much of what dismal scientists do today. It goes to the heart of one of the biggest challenges in economics: how to arrange our economic interactions so that, when everyone behaves in a self-interested manner, the result is something we all like."
  8. ^Machlup, Fritz (1976)."The Dismal Science and the Illth of Nations".Eastern Economic Journal.3 (2): 62.ISSN 0094-5056.JSTOR 40324699.

External links

[edit]
People
Places
Works
Ideas
Related
18th–19th-century
20th–21st-century
Concepts
Written works
Related
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_dismal_science&oldid=1322317506"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp