| Woodcreepers | |
|---|---|
| Cocoa woodcreeper | |
| Scientific classification | |
| Kingdom: | Animalia |
| Phylum: | Chordata |
| Class: | Aves |
| Order: | Passeriformes |
| Family: | Furnariidae |
| Subfamily: | Dendrocolaptinae |
| Genera | |
16, see article text | |
Thewoodcreepers (Dendrocolaptinae) comprise asubfamily ofsuboscinepasserinebirdsendemic to theNeotropics. They have traditionally been considered a distinctfamilyDendrocolaptidae, but most authorities now place them as a subfamily of theovenbirds (Furnariidae). They superficially resemble theOld Worldtreecreepers, but they are only distantly related and the similarities are due toconvergent evolution. The subfamily contains 60 species in 16genera.[1]
Woodcreepers range from 14 to 35 cm in length.[2][3] Generally brownish birds, the true woodcreepers maintain an upright vertical posture, supported by their specialized stiff tails.[4]
They feed mainly on insects taken from tree trunks. Some woodcreepers often form part of the core group at the centre of flocks attendingarmy ant swarms. Woodcreepers are arboreal cavity-nesting birds; two or three white eggs are laid and incubated for about 15 to 21 days.[2]
These birds can be difficult to identify in that they tend to have similar brown upperparts, and the more distinctive underparts are hard to see on a bird pressed against a trunk in deep forest shade. The bill shape, extend/shape of spots/streaks, and call are useful aids to determining species.

The woodcreepers are generally fairly uniform in appearance. They range in size from thewedge-billed woodcreeper (13 cm (5.1 in)) to thestrong-billed woodcreeper (35 cm (14 in)). Males tend to be slightly larger than females on average, but considerable overlap in size occurs in most species. Pronouncedsexual dimorphism in size andplumage is rare. Bill size and shape accounts for much of the variation between the species. Bills can be straight or highly decurved, and can account for as much as a quarter of the length of the bird (as happens in thelong-billed woodcreeper). The plumage is usually subdued and often brown, or sometimesrufous or other dark colours. Many species have patterns such as checking, spotting, or barring on their plumage. Thefeathers of the tail are rigid and are used for supporting the body when climbing tree trunks;[5][4] the tail can support most of the body weight and birds that lose their tail find climbing difficult. Woodcreepers climb by flexing their legs and hopping up the trunk. The feet of the woodcreepers are also modified for climbing. The front toes are strongly clawed and toe IV is as long as toe III to increase the ability of the bird to grasp around branches.[4] The legs are short but strong.[3] Woodcreepers are also characterized by a belly feather growth pattern not found in any other birds.

The woodcreepers are generally forest birds of Central and South America. Most species occur in rainforests, with the centre of diversity of the subfamily being theAmazon Basin. As many as 19 species of woodcreeper may co-occur in some areas of the Amazon, although in other rainforests, such as those in Costa Rica, the numbers are much lower. Other habitats used by the woodcreepers include pine-oak woodland, montanecloud forest, and pine forests. A few species, like thescimitar-billed woodcreeper, inhabit savannah or other partly open environments. Woodcreepers are absent from the temperate forests of southern South America.[3]
The woodcreepers are insectivores that are mostly arboreal in nature. Insects form the majority of the diet, with some spiders, centipedes, millipedes and even lizards being taken as well. A few specimens collected by scientists had fruit or seeds in their stomachs, but plant material is not thought to be regularly taken by any species. A few species forage on the ground, but most forage on the trunks of trees, on and on the underside of branches. They are generally solitary or occur in pairs, but frequently joinmixed-species feeding flocks. The flocks they join are usually the lower level ones rather than canopy flocks, and are usually those insectivorous ones rather than frugivorous ones. Prey is almost always obtained by moving up the trunk or branch, and there are two main foraging techniques, probing and sallying. Probers investigate rough bark, mosses, masses of trapped dead leaves,bromeliads, and other areas where prey may be hiding, whereas those thatsally launch into the air briefly to snatch prey that has been flushed by their movement. Several species regularlyattend swarms of army ants to catch prey flushed by the ants.[6]
The former family has been merged into the ovenbird family,Furnariidae, by most authorities because analyses ofmitochondrial andnuclearsequence data showed that theclade formed bySclerurus leaftossers andGeositta miners isbasal to the Furnariidaeand the woodcreepers.[7] An alternative option was recommended by Moyleet al. (2009),[8] in which the woodcreepers maintain their status as a family, while the ovenbirds (as traditionally defined) are split into two families: Scleruridae and Furnariidae.
The genusXenops, which have usually been considered ovenbirds, represent an early divergence. Although some analyses suggested that they are more closely related to the woodcreepers than to true furnariids,[9] other studies have not found the same results.[8][10] Others suggested placingXenops in its own family Xenopidae.[11]
Evolutionary relationships among woodcreeper species are now fairly well known thanks to the use ofDNA sequence data.[12][8][10] Some previous results based onmorphology[13] were not supported by molecular data, mostly due to instances ofconvergent evolution in beak morphology.[12] Plumage patterns, on the other hand, are more in agreement with the molecular data.
DNA studies revealed thatDeconychura species belong into separate genera[14] and that theGreater scythebill is not closely related to other scythebills in the genusCampylorhamphus but toDrymornis.[15] MovingLepidocolaptes fuscus toXiphorhynchus restoresmonophyly ofLepidocolaptes.
Additionally, the species-level taxonomy of several groups requires further study. Examples of "species" where vocal andmorphological variations suggests that more than one species-leveltaxon could be involved are thecurve-billed scythebill and thewhite-chinned,olivaceous,strong-billed andstraight-billed woodcreepers. The genusXiphorhynchus also requires much more research in this regard.[16][17]Hylexetastes may contain anything from one to four species.
A cladogram of the 16 woodcreeper genera based on the results of a 2020molecular phylogenetic study of thesuboscines by Michael Harvey and collaborators is shown below.[18]
| Dendrocolaptinae |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tribe | Image | Genus | Species |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sittasomini – "intermediate" woodcreepers[8] | CerthiasomusDerryberry et al., 2010 |
| |
| DeconychuraCherrie, 1891 |
| ||
| SittasomusSwainson, 1827 |
| ||
| DendrocinclaG.R. Gray, 1840 |
| ||
| Dendrocolaptini – "strong-billed" woodcreepers[8] | |||
| GlyphorynchusWied-Neuwied, 1831 |
| ||
| NasicaLesson, 1830 |
| ||
| DendrexetastesEyton, 1851 |
| ||
| DendrocolaptesHermann, 1804 |
| ||
| HylexetastesP.L. Sclater, 1889 |
| ||
| XiphocolaptesLesson, 1840 |
| ||
| DendroplexSwainson, 1827 |
| ||
| XiphorhynchusSwainson, 1827 (possiblypolyphyletic) |
| ||
| CampylorhamphusW. Bertoni, 1901 |
| ||
| DrymotoxeresClaramunt, Derryberry, Chesser, RT, Aleixo & Brumfield, 2010 |
| ||
| DrymornisEyton, 1852 |
| ||
| LepidocolaptesReichenbach, 1853 |
|