| Demographics ofBrazil | |
|---|---|
 Population pyramid ofBrazil in 2022 | |
| Population |  213,421,037 (2025 est.)[1] 203,080,756 (2022 census)[2] |
| Density | 25/km2 (65/sq mi) (2024 est.) |
| Growth rate |  0.61% (2024 est.) |
| Birth rate | 10.04 births/1,000 population (2024 est.) |
| Death rate |  7 deaths/1,000 population (2024 est.) |
| Life expectancy | 78.37 years (2024 est.) |
| • male | 75.3 years |
| • female | 82.2 years |
| Fertility rate | 1.47 children born/woman (2025 est.) |
| Infant mortality rate | 10.01 deaths/1,000 live births (2024 est.) |
| Net migration rate | −0.2 migrant(s)/1,000 population (2024 est.) |
| Age structure | |
| 0–14 years | 19.0% |
| 15–64 years | 69.5% |
| 65 and over |  11.4% (2024 est.) |
| Sex ratio | |
| Total | 0.97 male(s)/female (2024 est.) |
| At birth | 1.04 male(s)/female |
| Under 15 | 1.04 male(s)/female |
| 15–64 years | 0.98 male(s)/female |
| 65 and over | 0.75 male(s)/female |
| Nationality | |
| Nationality | Brazilian |
| Major ethnic | |
| Minor ethnic | |
| Language | |
| Official | Portuguese |
| Spoken | Languages of Brazil |
Brazil had an official resident population of 203 million in 2022, according to theBrazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE).[4] Brazil is theseventh most populous country in the world and the second most populous in theAmericas andWestern Hemisphere.
Brazilians are mainly concentrated in the eastern part of the country, which comprises the Southeast, South, and Northeast. But it also has a significant presence in large cities in the Center-West and North.[5] According to the2022 census, Brazil had 88,252,121 White people, 92,083,286 Mixed people, 20,656,458 Black people, 850,132 Asian people, and 1,227,640 Indigenous people.[2]
| Year | Pop. | ±% p.a. |
|---|---|---|
| 1890 | 14,333,915 | — |
| 1900 | 17,438,434 | +1.98% |
| 1920 | 30,635,605 | +2.86% |
| 1940 | 41,236,315 | +1.50% |
| 1950 | 51,944,397 | +2.34% |
| 1960 | 70,992,343 | +3.17% |
| 1970 | 94,508,583 | +2.90% |
| 1980 | 121,150,573 | +2.51% |
| 1991 | 146,917,459 | +1.77% |
| 2000 | 169,872,856 | +1.63% |
| 2010 | 190,755,799 | +1.17% |
| 2022 | 203,080,756 | +0.52% |
| Source:[6][7] | ||
According to the 2008 PNAD (National Household Sample Survey), conducted by theIBGE, the Brazilian Statistics bureau, there were about 189,953,000 inhabitants in 2008.[8] As of the latest (2022) census, theBrazilian government estimates its population at 203 million.
The population of Brazil is estimated based on various sources from 1550 to 1850. The first official census took place in 1872. From that year, every 10 years (with some exceptions) the population is counted.[9]
Brazil is the seventh most populated country in the world.
Population distribution in Brazil is very uneven. The majority of Brazilians live within 300 km (190 mi) of the coast, while the interior in the Amazon Basin is highly remote. Therefore, the densely populated areas are on the coast and the sparsely populated areas are in the interior.
According to the 2022 revision of theWorld Population Prospects[11][12] the population was 214,326,223 in 2021, compared to only 53,975,000 in 1950. The proportion of children below the age of 15 in 2015 was 20.7%, 69.8% was between 15 and 61 years of age, while 9.5% was 65 years or older.[13]
| Year | Total population ( × 1000) | Population percentage in age bracket | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| aged <15 | aged 15–64 | aged 65+ | ||
| 1950 | 53 975 | 41.6% | 55.5% | 3.0% |
| 1955 | 62 656 | 42.0% | 55.0% | 3.0% |
| 1960 | 72 494 | 43.1% | 53.7% | 3.1% |
| 1965 | 84 130 | 43.6% | 53.0% | 3.4% |
| 1970 | 95 982 | 42.3% | 54.2% | 3.5% |
| 1975 | 108 431 | 40.2% | 56.0% | 3.8% |
| 1980 | 122 200 | 38.4% | 57.6% | 4.0% |
| 1985 | 136 836 | 36.9% | 59.0% | 4.1% |
| 1990 | 150 393 | 35.4% | 60.1% | 4.5% |
| 1995 | 162 755 | 32.4% | 62.6% | 5.0% |
| 2000 | 175 786 | 29.7% | 64.7% | 5.6% |
| 2005 | 188 479 | 27.5% | 66.2% | 6.3% |
| 2010 | 198 614 | 24.9% | 68.4% | 6.7% |
| 2015 | 207 848 | 22.5% | 69.5% | 9.0% |
| 2020 | 215 963 | 19.7% | 69.8% | 10.5% |
| Age Group | Male | Female | Total | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 93 406 990 | 97 348 809 | 190 755 799 | 100 |
| 0–4 | 7 016 987 | 6 779 171 | 13 796 158 | 7.23 |
| 5–9 | 7 624 144 | 7 345 231 | 14 969 375 | 7.85 |
| 10–14 | 8 725 413 | 8 441 348 | 17 166 761 | 9.00 |
| 15–19 | 8 558 868 | 8 432 004 | 16 990 872 | 8.91 |
| 20–24 | 8 630 229 | 8 614 963 | 17 245 192 | 9.04 |
| 25–29 | 8 460 995 | 8 643 419 | 17 104 414 | 8.97 |
| 30–34 | 7 717 658 | 8 026 854 | 15 744 512 | 8.25 |
| 35–39 | 6 766 664 | 7 121 915 | 13 888 579 | 7.28 |
| 40–44 | 6 320 568 | 6 688 796 | 13 009 364 | 6.82 |
| 45–49 | 5 692 014 | 6 141 338 | 11 833 352 | 6.20 |
| 50–54 | 4 834 995 | 5 305 407 | 10 140 402 | 5.32 |
| 55–59 | 3 902 344 | 4 373 877 | 8 276 221 | 4.34 |
| 60–64 | 3 041 035 | 3 468 085 | 6 509 120 | 3.41 |
| 65-69 | 2 224 065 | 2 616 745 | 4 840 810 | 2.54 |
| 70-74 | 1 667 372 | 2 074 264 | 3 741 636 | 1.96 |
| 75-79 | 1 090 517 | 1 472 930 | 2 563 447 | 1.34 |
| 80-84 | 668 623 | 998 349 | 1 666 972 | 0.87 |
| 85-89 | 310 759 | 508 724 | 819 483 | 0.43 |
| 90-94 | 114 964 | 211 594 | 326 558 | 0.17 |
| 95-99 | 31 529 | 66 806 | 98 335 | 0.05 |
| 100+ | 7 247 | 16 989 | 24 236 | 0.01 |
| Age group | Male | Female | Total | Percent |
| 0–14 | 23 366 544 | 22 565 750 | 45 932 294 | 24.08 |
| 15–64 | 63 925 370 | 66 816 658 | 130 742 028 | 68.54 |
| 65+ | 6 115 076 | 7 966 401 | 14 081 477 | 7.38 |
| Age Group | Male | Female | Total | % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 98 532 431 | 104 548 325 | 203 080 756 | 100 |
| 0–4 | 6 461 689 | 6 243 171 | 12 704 860 | 6.26 |
| 5–9 | 7 011 282 | 6 738 158 | 13 749 440 | 6.77 |
| 10–14 | 6 992 746 | 6 682 215 | 13 674 961 | 6.73 |
| 15–19 | 7 317 515 | 7 058 427 | 14 375 942 | 7.08 |
| 20–24 | 7 767 306 | 7 699 157 | 15 466 463 | 7.62 |
| 25–29 | 7 627 458 | 7 842 265 | 15 469 723 | 7.62 |
| 30–34 | 7 537 285 | 7 935 832 | 15 473 117 | 7.62 |
| 35–39 | 7 827 333 | 8 345 458 | 16 172 791 | 7.96 |
| 40–44 | 7 781 059 | 8 291 111 | 16 072 170 | 7.91 |
| 45–49 | 6 549 109 | 7 091 003 | 13 640 112 | 6.72 |
| 50–54 | 6 014 391 | 6 584 190 | 12 598 581 | 6.20 |
| 55–59 | 5 419 505 | 6 149 601 | 11 569 106 | 5.70 |
| 60–64 | 4 605 834 | 5 338 555 | 9 944 389 | 4.90 |
| 65-69 | 3 588 052 | 4 288 180 | 7 876 232 | 3.88 |
| 70-74 | 2 615 350 | 3 243 186 | 5 858 536 | 2.88 |
| 75-79 | 1 657 786 | 2 189 593 | 3 847 379 | 1.89 |
| 80-84 | 1 009 852 | 1 465 178 | 2 475 030 | 1.22 |
| 85-89 | 493 649 | 835 554 | 1 329 203 | 0.65 |
| 90-94 | 194 341 | 385 388 | 579 729 | 0.29 |
| 95-99 | 50 319 | 114 859 | 165 178 | 0.08 |
| 100+ | 10 570 | 27 244 | 37 814 | 0.02 |
| Age group | Male | Female | Total | Percent |
| 0–14 | 20 465 717 | 19 663 544 | 40 129 261 | 19.76 |
| 15–64 | 68 446 795 | 72 335 599 | 140 782 394 | 69.32 |
| 65+ | 9 619 919 | 12 549 182 | 22 169 101 | 10.92 |
| Brazil 100% | European 47.73% | African 7.61% | Asian 1.09% | Pardo (Multiracial) 43.13% | Native Indigenous 0.43% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Population 0–14 | 45,932,294 | 20,460,482 | 2,698,639 | 420,952 | 22,055,573 | 295,862 |
| Percent group 0–14 in race | 24.08% | 22.47% | 18.59% | 20.02% | 26.81% | 36.17% |
| Population 0–14 compared to racial groups | 100% | 44.54% | 5.88% | 0.92% | 48.02% | 0.64% |
| Population 15–49 | 105,816,285 | 49,381,206 | 8,693,350 | 1,178,391 | 46,156,227 | 402,079 |
| Proportions 0–14 to 15–49 | 0,43407 | 0,41434 | 0,31043 | 0,35723 | 0,47785 | 0,73583 |
| Age group | Brazil 100% (percent of the population) | European 47.73% (percent in the race/percent in the age group) | African 7.61% (percent in the race/percent in the age group) | Asian 1.09% (percent in the race/percent in the age group) | Pardo (Multiracial) 43.13% (percent in the race/percent in the age group) | Native Indigenous 0.43% (percent in the race/percent in the age group) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Population | 190,755,799 | 91,051,646 | 14,517,961 | 2,084,288 | 82,277,333 | 817,963 | 6,608 |
| 0–4 | 13,796,158 (7.23%) | 6,701,186 (7.36%/48.57%) | 655,958 (4.52%/4.75%) | 119,956 (5.76%/0.87%) | 6,217,638 (7.56%/45.07%) | 101,195 (12.37%/0.73%) | 225 |
| 5–9 | 14,969,375 (7.85%) | 6,562,558 (7.21%/43.84%) | 887,209 (6.11%/5.93%) | 139,543 (6.69%/0.93%) | 7,279,983 (8.85%/48.63%) | 99,841 (12.21%/0.67%) | 241 |
| 10–14 | 17,166,761 (9.00%) | 7,196,738 (7.90%/41.92%) | 1,155,472 (7.96%/6.73%) | 161,453 (7.75%/0.94%) | 8,557,952 (10.40%/49.85%) | 94,826 (11.59%/0.55%) | 320 |
| 15–19 | 16,990,872 (8.91%) | 7,311,734 (8.03%/43.03%) | 1,264,183 (8.71%/7.44%) | 177,008 (8.49%/1.04%) | 8,155,126 (9.91%/48.00%) | 82,500 (10.86%/0.49%) | 321 |
| 20–24 | 17,245,192 (9.04%) | 7,774,488 (8.54%/45.08%) | 1,381,677 (9.52%/8.01%) | 200,060 (9.60%/1.16%) | 7,814,487 (9.50%/45.31%) | 73,387 (8.97%/0.43%) | 1 093 |
| 25–29 | 17,104,414 (8.97%) | 7,936,115 (8.72%/46.40%) | 1,443,820 (9.95%/8.44%) | 202,733 (9.73%/1.19%) | 7,455,402 (9.06%/43.59%) | 65,104 (7.96%/0.38%) | 1 240 |
| 30–34 | 15,744,512 (8.25%) | 7,344,600 (8.07%/46.65%) | 1,360,298 (9.37%/8.64%) | 182,150 (8.74%/1.16%) | 6,800,175 (8.26%/43.19%) | 56,326 (6.89%/0.36%) | 963 |
| 35–39 | 13,888,579 (7.28%) | 6,596,137 (7.24%/47.49%) | 1,175,333 (8.10%/8.46%) | 152,546 (7.32%/1,10%) | 5,915,773 (7.18%/42.59%) | 48,167 (5.89%/0.35%) | 623 |
| 40–44 | 13,009,364 (6.82%) | 6,365,363 (6.99%/48.93%) | 1,095,301 (7.54%/8.42%) | 139,230 (6.68%/1.07%) | 5,368,059 (6.52%/41.26%) | 40,950 (5.01%/0.31%) | 461 |
| 45–49 | 11,833,352 (6.20%) | 6,052,769 (6.65%/51.15%) | 972,738 (6.70%/8.22%) | 124,664 (5.98%/1.05%) | 4,647,205 (5.65%/39.27%) | 35,645 (4.36%/0.30%) | 331 |
| 50–54 | 10,140,402 (5.32%) | 5,286,559 (5.81%/52.13%) | 848,098 (5.84%/8.36%) | 106,539 (5.11%/1.05%) | 3,869,792 (4.70%/38.16%) | 29,156 (3.56%/0.29%) | 258 |
| 55–59 | 8,276,221 (4.34%) | 4,404,057 (4.84%/53.21%) | 675,404 (4.65%/8.16%) | 95,149 (4.57%/1.15%) | 3,076,630 (3.74%/37.17%) | 24,800 (3.03%/0.30%) | 181 |
| 60–69 | 11,349,930 (5.95%) | 6,158,001 (6.76%/54.26%) | 906,487 (6.24%/7.99%) | 152,099 (7.30%/1.34%) | 4,097,068 (4.98%/36.10%) | 36,062 (4.41%/0.32%) | 213 |
| 70+ | 9,240,667 (4.84%) | 5,361,341 (5.89%/58.02%) | 695,983 (4.79%/7.53%) | 131,158 (6.29%/1.42%) | 3,022,043 (3.67%/32.70%) | 30,004 (3.67%/0.32%) | 138 |
In Brazil, most important cities are on the coast or close to it. State capitals are also, commonly, the largest city of their states. Notable exceptions to this areVitória, the capital ofEspírito Santo, andFlorianópolis, the capital ofSanta Catarina.
There are also non-capital metropolitan areas, for example, inSão Paulo state (Campinas,Santos,Paraíba Valley,Sorocaba,Ribeirão Preto andFranca),Minas Gerais (Steel Valley),Rio Grande do Sul (Sinos Valley), and Santa Catarina (Itajaí Valley), amongst others.
São Paulo andRio de Janeiro are far larger than any other Brazilian cities. São Paulo's influence in most economic aspects can be noted in a national (and even international) scale; Rio de Janeiro – partially due to its former status as the national capital – still host various largecorporations' headquarters, besides being Brazil's cultural center with respect tofilm production and other such televised media.Brasília, the capital of Brazil, is its 3rd biggest city.
| Year | Population | Live births | Deaths | Natural increase | Crude birth rate (per 1,000) | Crude death rate (per 1,000) | Natural change (per 1,000) | Total fertility rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1976 | 113,235,227 | 3,600,000 | 760,000 | 2,840,000 | 31.78 | 6.71 | 25.07 | |
| 1977 | 115,557,619 | 3,610,000 | 770,000 | 2,840,000 | 31.25 | 6.66 | 24.59 | |
| 1978 | 117,849,865 | 3,620,000 | 785,000 | 2,835,000 | 30.73 | 6.66 | 24.07 | |
| 1979 | 120,113,508 | 3,650,000 | 800,000 | 2,850,000 | 30.37 | 6.66 | 23.71 | |
| 1980 | 121,150,573 | 3,640,000 | 820,000 | 2,820,000 | 30.05 | 6.77 | 23.28 | |
| 1981 | 121,978,244 | 3,486,000 | 781,000 | 2,705,000 | 28.58 | 6.40 | 22.18 | |
| 1982 | 124,165,855 | 3,545,000 | 806,000 | 2,739,000 | 28.55 | 6.49 | 22.06 | |
| 1983 | 126,322,167 | 3,524,000 | 831,000 | 2,693,000 | 27.90 | 6.58 | 21.32 | |
| 1984 | 128,441,111 | 3,482,000 | 855,000 | 2,627,000 | 27.11 | 6.66 | 20.45 | |
| 1985 | 130,514,405 | 3,523,000 | 877,000 | 2,646,000 | 26.99 | 6.72 | 20.27 | |
| 1986 | 132,536,250 | 3,578,000 | 900,000 | 2,678,000 | 27.00 | 6.79 | 20.21 | |
| 1987 | 134,509,334 | 3,620,000 | 919,000 | 2,701,000 | 26.91 | 6.83 | 20.08 | |
| 1988 | 136,438,714 | 3,641,000 | 930,000 | 2,711,000 | 26.69 | 6.82 | 19.87 | |
| 1989 | 138,330,173 | 3,457,291 | 843,256 | 2,614,035 | 24.99 | 6.10 | 18.90 | |
| 1990 | 140,190,598 | 3,507,335 | 859,522 | 2,647,813 | 25.02 | 6.13 | 18.89 | |
| 1991 | 146,917,459 | 3,452,487 | 876,397 | 2,576,090 | 23.49 | 5.97 | 17.53 | |
| 1992 | 148,661,804 | 3,370,548 | 888,480 | 2,482,068 | 22.66 | 5.98 | 16.70 | |
| 1993 | 150,468,717 | 3,281,193 | 913,618 | 2,367,575 | 21.80 | 6.07 | 15.73 | |
| 1994 | 152,357,254 | 3,157,241 | 920,348 | 2,236,893 | 20.73 | 6.04 | 14.68 | |
| 1995 | 154,255,819 | 3,062,431 | 936,068 | 2,126,363 | 19.86 | 6.07 | 13.79 | |
| 1996 | 156,009,399 | 3,019,769 | 950,328 | 2,069,441 | 19.36 | 6.09 | 13.26 | |
| 1997 | 157,784,093 | 3,035,898 | 980,515 | 2,055,383 | 19.24 | 6.21 | 13.03 | |
| 1998 | 159,553,507 | 3,035,197 | 1,011,218 | 2,023,979 | 19.02 | 6.34 | 12.69 | |
| 1999 | 161,296,715 | 3,020,616 | 1,024,073 | 1,996,543 | 18.73 | 6.35 | 12.38 | |
| 2000 | 169,590,693 | 3,206,761 | 946,686 | 2,260,075 | 18.8 | 5.6 | 13.2 | |
| 2001 | 176,208,646 | 3,115,474 | 961,492 | 2,153,982 | 17.7 | 5.5 | 12.2 | |
| 2002 | 178,499,255 | 3,059,402 | 982,807 | 2,076,595 | 17.1 | 5.5 | 11.6 | |
| 2003 | 180,708,344 | 3,038,251 | 1,005,882 | 2,420,845 | 19.0 | 5.6 | 13.4 | |
| 2004 | 182,865,043 | 3,026,548 | 1,025,981 | 2,303,139 | 18.2 | 5.6 | 12.6 | |
| 2005 | 184,991,143 | 3,035,096 | 1,010,052 | 2,319,379 | 18.0 | 5.5 | 12.5 | |
| 2006 | 187,061,610 | 2,944,828 | 1,037,504 | 2,134,496 | 17.0 | 5.5 | 11.5 | |
| 2007 | 189,038,268 | 2,891,328 | 1,050,408 | 2,029,858 | 16.3 | 5.6 | 10.7 | |
| 2008 | 191,010,274 | 2,934,828 | 1,074,889 | 2,033,038 | 16.3 | 5.6 | 10.7 | |
| 2009 | 192,980,905 | 2,881,581 | 1,098,384 | 1,947,312 | 15.8 | 5.7 | 10.1 | 1.906 |
| 2010 | 195,497,797 | 2,861,868 | 1,132,701 | 1,852,705 | 15.3 | 5.8 | 9.5 | 1.869 |
| 2011 | 197,397,018 | 2,913,160 | 1,163,740 | 1,880,854 | 15.4 | 5.9 | 9.5 | 1.833 |
| 2012 | 199,242,462 | 2,905,789 | 1,172,443 | 1,857,921 | 15.2 | 5.9 | 9.3 | 1.801 |
| 2013 | 201,032,714 | 2,904,027 | 1,195,913 | 1,794,068 | 14.9 | 5.9 | 8.9 | 1.770 |
| 2014 | 202,768,562 | 2,979,259 | 1,208,587 | 1,832,981 | 15.0 | 6.0 | 9.0 | 1.742 |
| 2015 | 204,450,649 | 3,017,668 | 1,244,558 | 1,814,225 | 15.0 | 6.1 | 8.9 | 1.716 |
| 2016 | 206,081,432 | 2,857,800 | 1,288,856 | 1,615,077 | 14.1 | 6.3 | 7.8 | 1.692 |
| 2017 | 207,660,929 | 2,923,535 | 1,292,297 | 1,670,518 | 14.3 | 6.2 | 8.0 | 1.63 |
| 2018 | 208,494,900 | 2,944,932 | 1,298,579 | 1,684,988 | 14.3 | 6.2 | 8.1 | 1.61 |
| 2019 | 210,147,125 | 2,849,146 | 1,332,466 | 1,555,752 | 13.7 | 6.3 | 7.4 | 1.59 |
| 2020 | 211,242,542 | 2,730,145 | 1,524,949 | 1,203,324 | 12.9 | 7.2 | 5.7 | 1.57 |
| 2021 | 213,317,639 | 2,677,101 | 1,802,487 | 906,397 | 12.7 | 8.5 | 4.2 | 1.53 |
| 2022 | 203,080,756 | 2,561,922 | 1,524,731 | 1,096,284 | 12.9 | 7.5 | 5.4 | 1.6(e) |
| 2023 | 204,153,622 | 2,537,576 | 1,450,421 | 1,147,868 | 12.7 | 7.1 | 5.6 | 1.57(e) |
| 2024 | 212,583,750 | 2,384,438 | 1,527,366 | 857,072 | 11.6 | 7.5 | 4.1 | 1.47(e) |
| 2025 | 213,421,037 |
| Period | Live births | Deaths | Natural increase |
|---|---|---|---|
| January – July 2024 | 1,441,006 | 906,128 | +534,878 |
| January – July 2025 | 1,444,333 | 880,838 | +563,945 |
| Difference | +3,327 (+0.23%) | –25,290 (-2.79%) | +28,617 |
| Source:[22][23] | |||
| region | TFR |
|---|---|
| North Region | 1.81 |
| Central-West Region | 1.67 |
| Northeast Region | 1.54 |
| South Region | 1.53 |
| Southeast Region | 1.45 |
| states | TFR |
|---|---|
 Roraima | 2.02 |
 Mato Grosso | 1.90 |
 Amazonas | 1.89 |
 Amapá | 1.86 |
 Acre | 1.87 |
 Tocantins | 1.81 |
 Mato Grosso do Sul | 1.80 |
 Alagoas | 1.72 |
 Pará | 1.70 |
 Rondônia | 1.67 |
 Espírito Santo | 1.64 |
 Maranhão | 1.61 |
 Goiás | 1.60 |
 Paraíba | 1.60 |
 Piauí | 1.58 |
 Paraná | 1.55 |
 Santa Catarina | 1.53 |
 Sergipe | 1.52 |
 Pernambuco | 1.51 |
 Ceará | 1.49 |
 Rio Grande do Sul | 1.49 |
 Minas Gerais | 1.46 |
 Rio Grande do Norte | 1.46 |
 São Paulo | 1.45 |
 Distrito Federal | 1.42 |
 Bahia | 1.40 |
 Rio de Janeiro | 1.32 |
In some states in the North and Northeast, the fertility rate was higher than the national average in 2021. The highest rate was inAcre, with 1.98 children per woman. Other regions with high fertility includeAmapá, with 1.87 children per woman,Amazonas, 1.85 inRoraima, 1.84, inMaranhão, 1.82, andPará, 1.79.
On the other hand,São Paulo is the state with the lowest rate, 1.26 children per woman. Other states with low fertility includeSanta Catarina, with 1.28,Rio Grande do Sul, 1.3, inRio de Janeiro, 1.32 inParaná andMinas Gerais, 1.33.
Regarding race of mothers, between 2015 and 2021, the fertility rate of all racial groups fell below replacement rate. Black fertility fell from 2.01 to 1.76, Pardo/Mixed fertility fell from 1.95 to 1.73 and white fertility fell from 1.60 to 1.55. There was no information regarding Asian fertility rates. Indigenous fertility was calculated at 3.87 children per women in 2010.[25]
According to the 2022 census, the total fertility by race was:[26]
Thetotal fertility rate is the number of children born per woman. It is based on fairly good data for the entire period. Sources:Our World In Data andGapminder Foundation.[27]
| Years | 1940 | 1941 | 1942 | 1943 | 1944 | 1945 | 1946 | 1947 | 1948 | 1949 | 1950[27] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total fertility rate in Brazil | 5.9 | 5.92 | 5.95 | 5.98 | 6.01 | 6.04 | 6.07 | 6.09 | 6.12 | 6.15 | 6.14 |
| Years | 1951 | 1952 | 1953 | 1954 | 1955 | 1956 | 1957 | 1958 | 1959 | 1960[27] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total fertility rate in Brazil | 6.13 | 6.1 | 6.09 | 6.08 | 6.07 | 6.07 | 6.07 | 6.08 | 6.08 | 6.07 |
| Years | 1961 | 1962 | 1963 | 1964 | 1965 | 1966 | 1967 | 1968 | 1969 | 1970[27] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total fertility rate in Brazil | 6.05 | 6 | 5.94 | 5.85 | 5.73 | 5.6 | 5.45 | 5.3 | 5.15 | 5.01 |
| Years | 1971 | 1972 | 1973 | 1974 | 1975 | 1976 | 1977 | 1978 | 1979 | 1980[27] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total fertility rate in Brazil | 4.88 | 4.76 | 4.65 | 4.55 | 4.46 | 4.39 | 4.31 | 4.24 | 4.16 | 4.07 |
| Years | 1981 | 1982 | 1983 | 1984 | 1985 | 1986 | 1987 | 1988 | 1989 | 1990[27] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total fertility rate in Brazil | 3.97 | 3.86 | 3.74 | 3.62 | 3.49 | 3.36 | 3.23 | 3.11 | 3.01 | 2.91 |
| Years | 1991 | 1992 | 1993 | 1994 | 1995 | 1996 | 1997 | 1998 | 1999 | 2000[27] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total fertility rate in Brazil | 2.83 | 2.76 | 2.69 | 2.64 | 2.59 | 2.54 | 2.48 | 2.43 | 2.37 | 2.3 |
| Years | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010[27] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total fertility rate in Brazil | 2.23 | 2.16 | 2.1 | 2.03 | 1.98 | 1.93 | 1.91 | 1.89 | 1.87 | 1.85 |
| Years | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2018[27][28] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total fertility rate in Brazil | 1.84 | 1.80 | 1.78 | 1.77 | 1.71 |
Registration of vital events inBrazil has considerably improved during the past decades but is still not considered complete, especially in the northern part of the country. The Population Division of the United Nations prepared the following estimates and forecasts.[13]
| Period | Live births per year | Deaths per year | Natural change per year | CBR* | CDR* | NC* | TFR* | IMR* | Life expectancy | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Males | Females | |||||||||
| 1950–1955 | 2 578 000 | 908,000 | 1 670 000 | 44.2 | 15.6 | 28.6 | 6.15 | 135 | 50.9 | 49.2 | 52.6 |
| 1955–1960 | 2 923 000 | 956,000 | 1 967 000 | 43.3 | 14.1 | 29.1 | 6.15 | 122 | 53.3 | 51.5 | 55.2 |
| 1960–1965 | 3 315 000 | 988,000 | 2 327 000 | 42.3 | 12.6 | 29.7 | 6.15 | 109 | 55.7 | 53.8 | 57.6 |
| 1965–1970 | 3 345 000 | 975,000 | 2 370 000 | 37.2 | 10.8 | 26.4 | 5.38 | 100 | 57.6 | 55.7 | 59.6 |
| 1970–1975 | 3 462 000 | 973,000 | 2 489 000 | 33.9 | 9.5 | 24.4 | 4.72 | 91 | 59.5 | 57.3 | 61.8 |
| 1975–1980 | 3 788 000 | 1 035 000 | 2 753 000 | 32.9 | 9.0 | 23.9 | 4.31 | 79 | 61.5 | 59.2 | 63.9 |
| 1980–1985 | 4 006 000 | 1 078 000 | 2 928 000 | 28.9 | 8.3 | 22.6 | 3.30 | 63 | 63.4 | 60.4 | 66.8 |
| 1985–1990 | 3 790 000 | 1 079 000 | 2 711 000 | 24.4 | 7.5 | 18.9 | 2.95 | 52 | 65.3 | 61.9 | 69.1 |
| 1990–1995 | 3 547 000 | 1 074 000 | 2 473 000 | 22.0 | 6.9 | 15.8 | 2.40 | 43 | 67.3 | 63.6 | 71.2 |
| 1995–2000 | 3 658 000 | 1 052 000 | 2 606 000 | 20.6 | 6.2 | 15.4 | 2.21 | 34 | 70.3 | 66.5 | 74.3 |
| 2000–2005 | 3 370 000 | 1 102 000 | 2 268 000 | 17.8 | 5.9 | 13.9 | 2.05 | 27 | 71.9 | 68.2 | 75.8 |
| 2005–2010 | 3 066 000 | 1 149 000 | 1 917 000 | 15.4 | 5.9 | 10.5 | 1.81 | 24 | 73.2 | 69.7 | 76.9 |
| 2010–2015 | 2 975 000 | 1 227 000 | 1 748 000 | 13.0 | 5.9 | 9.1 | 1.76 | 19 | 74.8 | 71.2 | 78.5 |
| 2015–2020 | 2 934 000 | 1 338 000 | 1 596 000 | 11.8 | 6.3 | 7.5 | 1.63 | 16 | 76.5 | 73.0 | 80.1 |
| 2020–2025 | 2 763 000 | 1 477 000 | 1 286 000 | 10.7 | 6.7 | 6.0 | |||||
| 2025–2030 | 2 585 000 | 1 625 000 | 960 000 | 11.7 | 7.1 | 4.6 | |||||
| 2030–2035 | 2 445 000 | 1 781 000 | 664 000 | 10.9 | 7.7 | 3.2 | |||||
| 2035–2040 | 2 318 000 | 1 945 000 | 373 000 | 10.3 | 8.3 | 2.0 | |||||
CBR = crude birth rate (per 1000); CDR = crude death rate (per 1000); NC = natural change (per 1000); IMR = infant mortality rate per 1000 births; TFR = total fertility rate (number of children per woman)
The color or race of the woman and the level of education has also shown to influence the fact of not having children. In 2013, among white women aged 15 to 55 years, 41.5% had no children, while among black and brown women, the percentage was 35.8%.
The proportional difference is even greater among white women compared to black and brown 25–29 years. While the proportion among white women childless was 48.1% among black and brown women was 33.8%.
Regarding education, among women 15–49 years of age with more than eight years of schooling, 50% had no children in 2013, while among those with up to seven years of study this figure was 5%.
Schooling among women 25–29 years has shown an even greater disparity. Among the less educated, 16.3% had no children, while among the more educated 54.5% had no children. The proportion of women aged 45 to 49 without children was 8.2% in 2013 among those with less education and 15.1% among those with more years of schooling.
| Total 100% | European 43.46% | African 10.17% | Asian 0.42% | Pardo (Multiracial) 45.34% | Native Indigenous 0.60% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Population 0–14 | 40 129 261 | 16 928 202 | 2 931 938 | 96 204 | 19 768 271 | 403 008 |
| Percent group 0–14 by race | 19.76% | 19.18% | 14.19% | 11.32% | 21.47% | 32.83% |
| Population 0–14 compared to racial groups [clarification needed] | 100% | 42.18% | 7.31% | 0.24% | 49.26% | 1.00% |
| Population 15–49 | 106 670 318 | 43 655 766 | 11 919 890 | 394 574 | 50 071 944 | 621 087 |
| Ratio 0–14 to 15–49 | 0.3762 | 0.3878 | 0.2460 | 0.2438 | 0.3948 | 0.6489 |
| Age group | Brazil 100% (percent of the population) | European 43.46% | African 10.17% | Asian 0.42% | Pardo (Multiracial) 45.34% | Native Indigenous 0.60% | [Definition missing] |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (percent in the race/percent in the age group) | |||||||
| Total | 203 080 756 | 88 252 121 | 20 656 458 | 850 130 | 92 083 286 | 1 227 642 | 11 119 |
| 0–4 | 12 704 860 (6.26%) | 5 784 444 (6.55%/45.53%) | 801 774 (3.88%/6.31%) | 27 148 (3.19%/0.21%) | 5 951 556 (6.46%/46.84%) | 139 379 (11.35%/1.10%) | 559 |
| 5–9 | 13 749 440 (6.77%) | 5 734 804 (6.50%/41.71%) | 1 020 633 (4.94%/7.42%) | 33 191 (3.90%/0.24%) | 6 824 824 (7.41%/49.64%) | 135 440 (11.03%/0.99%) | 548 |
| 10–14 | 13 674 961 (6.73%) | 5 408 954 (6.13%/39.55%) | 1 109 531 (5.37%/8.11%) | 35 865 (4.22%/0.26%) | 6 991 891 (7.59%/51.13%) | 128 189 (10.44%/0.94%) | 531 |
| 15–19 | 14 375 942 (7.08%) | 5 610 575 (6.36%/39.03%) | 1 403 059 (6.79%/9.76%) | 42 066 (4.95%/0.29%) | 7 196 383 (7.82%/50.06%) | 123 236 (10.04%/0.86%) | 623 |
| 20–24 | 15 466 463 (7.62%) | 6 076 604 (6.89%/39.29%) | 1 725 800 (8.35%/11.16%) | 49 540 (5.83%/0.32%) | 7 500 613 (8.15%/48.50%) | 112 621 (9.17%/0.73%) | 1 285 |
| 25–29 | 15 469 723 (7.62%) | 6 182 951 (7.01%/39.97%) | 1 782 294 (8.63%/11.52%) | 51 685 (6.08%/0.33%) | 7 355 701 (7.99%/47.55%) | 95 762 (7.8%/0.62%) | 1 330 |
| 30–34 | 15 473 117 (7.62%) | 6 375 027 (7.22%/41.20%) | 1 747 944 (8.46%/11.30%) | 56 875 (6.69%/0.37%) | 7 208 525 (7.83%/46.59%) | 83 594 (6.81%/0.54%) | 1 152 |
| 35–39 | 16 172 791 (7.96%) | 6 725 099 (7.62%/41.58%) | 1 850 687 (8.96%/11.44%) | 65 073 (7.65%/0.40%) | 7 452 696 (8.09%/46.08%) | 78 225 (6.37%/0.48%) | 1 011 |
| 40–44 | 16 072 170 (7.91%) | 6 827 463 (7.74%/42.48%) | 1 851 159 (8.96%/11.52%) | 69 575 (8.18%/0.43%) | 7 253 228 (7.88%/45.13%) | 69 796 (5.69%/0.43%) | 949 |
| 45–49 | 13 640 112 (6.72%) | 5 858 047 (6.64%/42.95%) | 1 558 947 (7.55%/11.43%) | 59 760 (7.03%/0.44%) | 6 104 798 (6.63%/44.76%) | 57 853 (4.71%/0.42%) | 707 |
| 50–54 | 12 598 581 (6.20%) | 5 628 210 (6.38%/44.67%) | 1 403 801 (6.80%/11.14%) | 56 819 (6.68%/0.45%) | 5 460 379 (5.93%/43.34%) | 48 764 (3.97%/0.39%) | 608 |
| 55–59 | 11 569 106 (5.70%) | 5 442 507 (6.17%/47.04%) | 1 225 630 (5.93%/10.59%) | 55 775 (6.56%/0.48%) | 4 802 770 (5.22%/41.51%) | 41 912 (3.41%/0.36%) | 512 |
| 60–64 | 9 944 389 (4.90%) | 4 851 865 (5.50%/48.79%) | 1 038 306 (5.03%/10.44%) | 53 220 (6.26%/0.54%) | 3 965 766 (4.31%/39.88%) | 34 801 (2.83%/0.35%) | 431 |
| 65-69 | 7 876 232 (3.88%) | 3 979 726 (4.51%/50.53%) | 795 018 (3.85%/10.09%) | 52 667 (6.20%/0.67%) | 3 021 587 (3.28%/38.36%) | 26 946 (2.19%/0.34%) | 288 |
| 70-74 | 5 858 536 (2.88%) | 3 072 479 (3.48%/52.44%) | 571 071 (2.76%/9.75%) | 50 568 (5.95%/0.86%) | 2 144 482 (2.33%/36.60%) | 19 686 (1.60%/0.34%) | 250 |
| 75-79 | 3 847 379 (1.89%) | 2 091 008 (2.37%/54.35%) | 357 500 (1.73%/9.29%) | 39 386 (4.63%/1.02%) | 1 345 830 (1.46%/34.98%) | 13 528 (1.10%/0.35%) | 127 |
| 80-84 | 2 475 030 (1.22%) | 1 380 516 (1.56%/55.78%) | 225 159 (1.09%/9.10%) | 27 271 (3.21%/1.10%) | 832 790 (0.90%/33.65%) | 9 171 (0.75%/0.37%) | 123 |
| 85-89 | 1 329 203 (0.65%) | 771 547 (0.87%/58.05%) | 116 147 (0.56%/8.74%) | 14 890 (1.75%/1.12%) | 421 745 (0.46%/31.73%) | 4 823 (0.39%/0.36%) | 51 |
| 90-94 | 579 729 (0.29%) | 341 266 (0.39%/58.87%) | 50 582 (0.24%/8.73%) | 6 520 (0.77%/1.12%) | 179 016 (0.19%/30.88%) | 2 319 (0.19%/0.40%) | 26 |
| 95-99 | 165 178 (0.08%) | 92 544 (0.10%/56.03%) | 15 990 (0.08%/9.68%) | 1 924 (0.23%/1.16%) | 53 733 (0.06%/32.53%) | 983 (0.08%/0.60%) | 4 |
| 100+ | 37 814 (0.02%) | 16 485 (0.02%/43.59%) | 5 426 (0.03%/14.35%) | 312 (0.04%/0.83%) | 14 973 (0.02%/39.60%) | 614 (0.05%/1.62%) | 4 |
| 0-14 | 40 129 261 (19.76%) | 16 928 202 (19.18%/42.18%) | 2 931 938 (14.19%/7.31%) | 96 204 (11.32%/0.24%) | 19 768 271 (21.47%/49.26%) | 403 008 (32.83%/1.00%) | 1 638 |
| 15-64 | 140 782 394 (69.32%) | 59 578 348 (67.51%/42.32%) | 15 587 627 (75.46%/11.07%) | 560 388 (65.92%/0.40%) | 64 300 859 (69.83%/45.67%) | 746 564 (60.81%/0.53%) | 8 608 |
| 65+ | 22 169 101 (10.92%) | 11 745 571 (13.31%/52.98%) | 2 136 893 (10.34%/9.64%) | 193 538 (22.77%/0.87%) | 8 014 156 (8.70%/36.15%) | 78 070 (6.36%/0.35%) | 873 |
TheUnited Nations reported in the International Migration Stock that 64 countries had significant emigration or immigration with Brazil in 2020.[30][31] TheMigration Policy Institute defines significant migration if 1,000+ people are in the emigration or/and migration group.[32]Venezuela,Haiti,Portugal,Bolivia, andUruguay have the most positive net migration, while theUnited States,Japan,Spain,Italy, andFrance have the most negative net migration.
| Country | Immigrants | Emigrants | Net migration | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rank | People | Rank | People | Rank | People | |
 Venezuela | 1 | 248,105 | 30 | 5,680 | 1 | +242,425 |
 Portugal | 2 | 175,251 | 3 | 154,017 | 3 | +21,234 |
 Japan | 3 | 62,296 | 2 | 204,814 | 63 | -142,518 |
 Paraguay | 4 | 49,842 | 6 | 79,897 | 54 | -30,055 |
 Bolivia | 5 | 49,289 | 15 | 28,612 | 4 | +20,677 |
 Italy | 6 | 47,193 | 4 | 133,398 | 61 | -86,205 |
 Spain | 7 | 39,028 | 5 | 133,244 | 62 | -94,216 |
 Argentina | 8 | 36,910 | 10 | 49,267 | 49 | -12,357 |
 Haiti | 9 | 32,796 | 86 | 0 | 2 | +32,796 |
 Uruguay | 10 | 30,537 | 21 | 14,762 | 5 | +15,775 |
 China | 11 | 24,632 | 9 | 57,602 | 55 | -32,970 |
 United States | 12 | 22,410 | 1 | 517,519 | 64 | -495,109 |
 Germany | 13 | 20,625 | 7 | 70,888 | 59 | -50,263 |
 Chile | 14 | 19,596 | 18 | 18,976 | 28 | +620 |
 Peru | 15 | 19,074 | 19 | 16,458 | 17 | +2,616 |
 Lebanon | 16 | 15,664 | 86 | 0 | 6 | +15,664 |
 Cuba | 17 | 14,798 | 86 | 0 | 7 | +14,798 |
 France | 18 | 12,138 | 8 | 65,761 | 60 | -53,623 |
 South Korea | 19 | 10,981 | 86 | 0 | 8 | +10,981 |
 Colombia | 20 | 8,700 | 32 | 4,685 | 14 | +4,015 |
 Angola | 21 | 8,184 | 86 | 0 | 9 | +8,184 |
 Syria | 22 | 8,003 | 86 | 0 | 10 | +8,003 |
 United Kingdom | 23 | 6,281 | 11 | 44,175 | 56 | -37,894 |
 Senegal | 24 | 6,267 | 46 | 670 | 11 | +5,597 |
 Bangladesh | 25 | 5,384 | 22 | 14,628 | 47 | -9,244 |
 Poland | 26 | 4,421 | 51 | 340 | 13 | +4,081 |
 DR Congo | 27 | 4,375 | 86 | 0 | 12 | +4,375 |
 Netherlands | 28 | 4,219 | 17 | 22,974 | 51 | -18,755 |
 Egypt | 29 | 3,957 | 67 | 130 | 15 | +3,827 |
 Switzerland | 30 | 3,789 | 13 | 42,715 | 57 | -38,926 |
 Nigeria | 31 | 3,505 | 86 | 0 | 16 | +3,505 |
 Mexico | 32 | 3,400 | 27 | 6,964 | 39 | -3,564 |
 Austria | 33 | 2,968 | 29 | 6,173 | 38 | -3,205 |
 Israel | 34 | 2,554 | 25 | 8,673 | 44 | -6,119 |
 Ghana | 35 | 2,459 | 83 | 13 | 18 | +2,446 |
 Guyana | 36 | 2,407 | 42 | 1,260 | 26 | +1,147 |
 Ecuador | 37 | 2,195 | 37 | 2,774 | 32 | -579 |
 Romania | 38 | 2,164 | 44 | 690 | 21 | +1,474 |
 Belgium | 39 | 2,151 | 20 | 16,345 | 50 | -14,194 |
 Pakistan | 40 | 2,094 | 86 | 0 | 19 | +2,094 |
 Canada | 41 | 2,014 | 14 | 31,568 | 53 | -29,554 |
 South Africa | 42 | 2,014 | 35 | 3,535 | 35 | -1,521 |
 Greece | 43 | 1,956 | 39 | 2,258 | 31 | -302 |
 Hungary | 44 | 1,936 | 41 | 1,321 | 29 | +615 |
 Mozambique | 45 | 1,809 | 86 | 0 | 20 | +1,809 |
 Russia | 46 | 1,761 | 50 | 431 | 22 | +1,330 |
 Cabo Verde | 47 | 1,516 | 52 | 301 | 24 | +1,215 |
 Jordan | 48 | 1,338 | 70 | 105 | 23 | +1,233 |
 Dominican Republic | 50 | 1,274 | 45 | 671 | 30 | +603 |
 Guinea-Bissau | 51 | 1,199 | 86 | 0 | 25 | +1,199 |
 India | 52 | 1,118 | 86 | 0 | 27 | +1,118 |
| French Guiana | 54 | 896 | 16 | 25,729 | 52 | -24,833 |
 Sweden | 55 | 804 | 24 | 9,533 | 46 | -8,729 |
 Norway | 58 | 728 | 28 | 6,256 | 43 | -5,528 |
 Australia | 57 | 747 | 12 | 43,321 | 58 | -42,574 |
 Panama | 61 | 660 | 38 | 2,406 | 36 | -1,746 |
 Finland | 62 | 655 | 40 | 1,889 | 34 | -1,234 |
 Denmark | 65 | 626 | 33 | 4,605 | 41 | -3,979 |
 Czechia | 68 | 566 | 43 | 1,150 | 33 | -584 |
 New Zealand | 77 | 346 | 26 | 8,319 | 45 | -7,973 |
 Suriname | 78 | 346 | 31 | 5,566 | 42 | -5,220 |
 Ireland | 86 | 217 | 23 | 11,800 | 48 | -11,583 |
 North Korea | 88 | 182 | 36 | 2,841 | 37 | -2,659 |
 Luxembourg | 111 | 68 | 34 | 3,722 | 40 | -3,654 |
| Origin | 1830–1855 | 1856–1883 | 1884–1893 | 1894–1903 | 1904–1913 | 1914–1923 | 1924–1933 | 1934–2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Portuguese | 16,737 | 116,000 | 170,621 | 155,542 | 384,672 | 201,252 | 233,650 | 400,000 |
| Italians | — | 100,000 | 510,533 | 537,784 | 196,521 | 86,320 | 70,177 | |
| Spaniards | — | — | 113,116 | 102,142 | 224,672 | 94,779 | 52,400 | |
| Germans | 2,008 | 30,000 | 22,778 | 6,698 | 33,859 | 29,339 | 61,723 | |
| Japanese | — | — | — | — | 11,868 | 20,398 | 110,191 | |
| Lebanese | — | — | 96 | 7,124 | 45,803 | 20,400 | 20,400 | |
| Others | — | — | 66,524 | 42,820 | 109,222 | 51,493 | 164,586 |
Immigration has been a very important demographic factor in the formation, structure and history of the population in Brazil, influencing culture, economy, education, racial issues, etc. Brazil has received the third largest number of immigrants in theWestern Hemisphere.
Brazil's structure, legislation and settlement policies for arriving immigrants were much less organized than in Canada and the United States at the time. Nevertheless, anImmigrant Inn (Hospedaria dos Imigrantes) was built in 1886 in São Paulo, and quick admittance and recording routines for the throngs of immigrants arriving by ship at the seaports ofVitória,Rio de Janeiro,Santos,Paranaguá,Florianópolis andPorto Alegre were established. The São Paulo State alone processed more than 2.5 million immigrants in its almost 100 years of continuous operation. People of more than 70 different nationalities were recorded.
Following the trend of several other countries in the Americas, which encouraged immigration from many countries, Brazil quickly became amelting pot of races and nationalities, but being peculiar in the sense of having the highest degree of intermarriage in the world. Immigrants found a strong social and cultural tolerance towardinter-racial marriage, including large numbers ofMulattoes (European and African),Caboclos (Indian and European) and mixed European, African and Indian people, though it was not accompanied by an entire lack of racism. Correspondingly, the same mentality reflected in low psychological and social barriers regarding intermarriage between Europeans,Middle Easterners and Asians of several origins, as well as between people of different religions.
It is postulated that the Americas were settled by three migratory waves from Northern Asia. The Native Brazilians are thought to descend from the first wave of migrants, who arrived in the region around 9000 BC. The main Native Brazilian groups are theTupi-Guarani, theJê, theArawaks and the Caraibas (Kalina or Caribs). TheTupi-Guarani nation, originally from theParaná River basin and also one of the largest of the Native-Paraguayan nations, had spread all along the Brazilian coastline from South to North and came to be known by the Portuguese as "Os Índios da Língua Geral" ("The Indians of the General Language"); theJê nation occupied most of the interior of the country fromMaranhão toSanta Catarina. The Arawaks and the Caribs, the last ones to get in contact with the Portuguese, lived in the North and Northwest of Brazil.
The Europeanimmigration to Brazil started in the 16th century, with the vast majority of them coming fromPortugal. In the first two centuries of colonization, 100,000 Portuguese arrived in Brazil (around 500 colonists per year). In the 18th century, 600,000 Portuguese arrived (6,000 per year).[33] The first region to be settled by the Portuguese wasNortheastern Brazil, followed by theSoutheast region. The original Amerindian population of Brazil (between two and five million) largely died from disease or violence or was assimilated into the Portuguese population.[34] TheMamelucos (orCaboclos, a mixed race between Europeans and Amerindians) have always been present in many parts of Brazil.
Another important ethnic group, Africans, first arrived asslaves. Many came fromGuinea-Bissau, or from West African countries – by the end of the eighteenth century many had been taken from theKingdom of Kongo and modern-dayAngola,Congo, Mozambique,Benin andNigeria. By the time of the end of theslave trade in 1850, around six million slaves had been brought to Brazil–50% of all slave traffic between Africa and the Americas. Nowadays, there are still small immigration waves coming from the African continent. The largest influx of European immigrants to Brazil occurred in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. According to theMemorial do Imigrante statistics data, Brazil attracted nearly 5 million immigrants between 1870 and 1953.[35][36]
These immigrants were divided in two groups: a part of them was sent toSouthern Brazil to work as small farmers. However, the biggest part of the immigrants was sent toSoutheast Brazil to work in the coffee plantations. The immigrants sent to Southern Brazil were mainlyGermans (starting in 1824, mainly fromRhineland-Palatinate,Pomerania, Hamburg,Westphalia, etc.) Italians (starting in 1875, mainly from theVeneto andLombardia),Austrians,Poles,Ukrainians andRussians. In the South, the immigrants established rural communities that retain a cultural connection with their ancestral homelands. In Southeast Brazil, most of the immigrants were Italians (mainly from theVeneto,Campania,Calabria andLombardia), Portuguese (mainly fromBeira Alta,Minho andAlto Trás-os-Montes) andSpaniards (mainly fromGalicia andAndalusia).
Notably, the first half of the 20th century saw a large inflow of Japanese (mainly fromHonshū,Hokkaidō andOkinawa) and Levantine Christians fromLebanon (and few fromSyria). These Christian Levantine immigrants were wrongly called "Turks" by many Brazilians because their original countries were still under Ottoman rule back in the period when their immigration to Brazil began. The number of actual Turks who immigrated to Brazil was in fact very small. Chinese, Taiwanese and Koreans influx became common after the 1950s.
On the other hand, in 1998, theIBGE, within its preparation for the 2000 census, experimentally introduced a question about "origem" (origin/ancestry) in its "Pesquisa Mensal de Emprego" (Monthly Employment Research), to test the viability of introducing that variable in the census[37]: 3 (the IBGE ended by deciding against the inclusion of questions about it in the census). This research interviewed about 90,000 people in six metropolitan regions (São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Porto Alegre, Belo Horizonte, Salvador, and Recife).[37]: note 3, p. 3 To this day, it remains the only actual published survey about the immigrant origin of Brazilians.
Here are its results:[37]: table 6, p. 10
| Ancestry | % |
|---|---|
 Brazilian | 86.09% |
| Portuguese | 10.46% |
| Italian | 10.41% |
| Indigenous | 6.64% |
| Black | 5.09% |
| Spanish | 4.40% |
| German | 3.54% |
| African | 2.06% |
| Japanese | 1.34% |
| Lebanese/Syrian | 0.48% |
| Jewish | 0.20% |
| Others | 2.81% |
| Total‡ | 133.52% |
‡This is higher than 100% because of multiple answers. Many Brazilians are unaware of their ancestry, especially those whose ancestors migrated to Brazil long ago; hence the high number who declared themselves only as Brazilians.
In the second half of the 1980s, Brazilians from various socioeconomic backgrounds started to emigrate to other countries in search of better economic opportunities.
By the 1990s, nearly 1.9 million Brazilians were living outside the country, mainly in the United States, Paraguay and Japan,[38] but also in Italy, Portugal, the United Kingdom, France, Canada, Australia, Switzerland, Germany, Belgium, Spain and Israel. Despite the surge in the phenomenon, there were no specific policies implemented by the government to encourage or discourage this emigration process.[39] Thanks to the favourable outlook of the Brazilian economy and due to the crisis that hit countries such as Japan, Portugal or the United States, emigration of Brazilian citizens stagnated – with many returning to their home country – until 2011, when 1,898,762 Brazilians were living abroad.
The 2000 Brazilian census provides some information about the high number of migrants returning to Brazil. For instance, of those who reported residing in another country less than 10 years before the 2000 census, 66.9 percent were Brazilians. If only the returning migrants (former Brazilian immigrants) are considered, 26.8 percent of Brazilians came from Paraguay, 17 percent came from Japan, and 15.8 percent came from the United States.[39]
As political unrest, increasing violence, inflation, soaring unemployment rates and an economic crisis hit Brazil, millions of citizens moved abroad starting in 2011, generating the largest emigration process ever witnessed in Brazilian history, since Brazil has historically been a land of immigrants. In 2021 more than 4.4 million Brazilians live abroad,[40] this is an increase of around 132% compared to the previous 10 years.
The largest Brazilian community abroad, comprising almost half of the diaspora, is the one in the US, where around 2,000,000Brazilians live; they are present especially in Florida. Almost 300,000 Brazilians, hence 6.8% of all Brazilians living abroad, lived in otherPortuguese-speaking countries (94% in Portugal). In the same year around 680,000 Brazilians, hence 15.5% of the Brazilian diaspora, lived inSpanish-speaking countries, with the majority found in neighbouring countries such asParaguay andUruguay.
Other major communities are found in countries such as theUK (220,000Brazilians in 2021),Canada (122,500Brazilians in 2021)Ireland (70,000Brazilians in 2021) andAustralia (60,000Brazilians in 2021).
There are also noticeable Brazilian communities in countries once source of immigrants such asJapan (210,000Brazilians in 2021),Italy (162,000 Brazilians in 2021),Germany (140,000Brazilians in 2021),the Netherlands (65,000 Brazilians in 2021) andLebanon (21,000 Brazilians in 2021). Many of the Brazilians found in these countries are descendants of the earlyimmigrants who came to Brazil in the early 1900s.
There is also a sizeable Brazilian community in France (172,000Brazilians in 2021), almost equally split betweenMetropolitan France andFrench Guyana.
Brazilians are one of the most diverse populations in the world, as a result of the crosses between peoples from three continents: the European colonizers, represented mainly by the Portuguese; Africans; and the autochthonous Amerindians.[41] By 1500, around 2.5 million indigenous people were living in the area of what is now Brazil. It is estimated that about 500,000 Portuguese arrived in Brazil, between 1500 and 1808. The Portuguese-Amerindian admixture started soon after the arrival of the first Portuguese, in 1500. The native groups underwent a demographic decline due to conflicts with colonizers and diseases.[41] Portugal remained as the only significant source of European immigrants to Brazil until 1808, when Brazilian ports were legally opened to all friendly nations.[42] From then, Brazil received increasing numbers of immigrants, mostly from Portugal, followed by Italy, Spain, and Germany. In the 20th century, Asian immigrants also starting arriving, mainly from Japan, but also from Lebanon and Syria.[41]
TheBrazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE), which has conducted censuses in Brazil since 1940, racially classifies the Brazilian population in five categories: Branco (White), "Pardo" (brown), Preto (Black), Amarelo (Yellow - for people of East-Asian descent, such as Japanese, Chinese, Korean), and Indígena (Indigenous). Brazilians tend to classify themselves racially based on physical appearance, such as skin pigmentation, hair type, nose shape, and lip shape. There appears to be no racial descent rule operational in Brazil and it is even possible for two full siblings differing in color to belong to completely diverse racial categories. A 2016 survey found out that approximately 17–19% of Brazilian families have full siblings who are identified as different races. More than 80% of families with different-race siblings had one sibling identified as White and another identified as Pardo (brown). About 40% of families with one White and one non-White parent have different-race siblings.[43][44][45]
According to the 2022 census, there were 88,2 million white Brazilians, comprising 43.5% of Brazil's population.[3] Descendants of Europeans are found in the entire territory of Brazil, although they are most concentrated in the south and southeastern parts of the country.[46][47]A survey conducted in 1998 by the Minas Gerais sociologist Simon Schwartzman interviewed about 34 million Brazilians, of whom nearly 20 million declared themselves white. Asked the ethnic origin of the participants of white race, a plurality pointed only Brazilian origin (53%).More than half, however, managed to point to a foreign origin: 17.2% indicated Portuguese ancestry, 16.50% Italian, 9.42% Spanish, 6.51% German and 12.32% other origins, which include Polish, Ukrainian, Russian, Lithuanian, Dutch, Austrian, Swiss, French, Hungarian, Norwegian, partial distant African, indigenous, British, American Confederate, Jewish (mostly Ashkenazi, but also Sephardi including Jews from Morocco and Egypt) and Arab.[48][49]Many Whites in Brazil have some Amerindian and/or African ancestry (similarly found inEuropean-Americans[50] andEuropean-Argentines).[51]
Nowadays, European-Brazilians come from a very diverse background, which includes:
Brazil does not have a category for multiracial people, but aPardo (brown) one, which may includecaboclos, mulatos, cafuzos (local ethnonyms for people of noticeable mixed European and Amerindian, African and European, and Amerindian and African descent, i.e.,mestizos,mulattoes andzambos, respectively), the multiracial result of their intermixing (despite most of White and Black Brazilians possessing some degree of race-mixing, since brownness in Brazil is a matter of phenotype) and assimilated,westernized indigenous people.[61][62]
The Pardos make up 45.3% or 92.1 million people of Brazil's population.[63] They live in the entire territory of Brazil. Although, according to DNA resources, most Brazilians possess some degree of mixed-race ancestry, less than 45% of the country's population classified themselves as being part of this group due to phenotype.[64]
According to the 2022 census, there are 20.7 million self-declared Black Brazilians, about 10.2% of the population.[63][64]
According to the 2022 census, self-declared Yellow Brazilians number 850,130, or 0.42% of Brazil's population. Yellow is the term used for people ofEast Asian (Japanese, Korean, Chinese).[65] In 2022, Japan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs stated that there were 2 million Japanese descendants in Brazil.[66] Brazil has the largest population of Japanese descent outside Japan.[67]Japanese immigration to Brazil started on 18 June 1908, when the Japanese ship Kasato-Maru arrived in thePort of Santos, south ofSão Paulo, carrying the first 781 people to take advantage of a bilateral agreement promoting immigration.
There are also smaller communities of Korean people and Chinese origin.[68]
TheAmerindians make up 0.8% of Brazil's population, or about 1.6 million people. Over half of them (867,000 ou 51,2%) live in the regions of theAmazon rainforest ("Amazônia Legal").[69] Millions of Brazilians possess at least one Native South American ancestor, according to a mitochondrial DNA study, but only 0.8% self-identify as indigenous, due to race-mixing.[41]
Genetic studies have shown the Brazilian population as a whole to have European, African and Native American components.A 2015 autosomal DNA genetic study, which also analysed data of 25 studies of 38 different Brazilian populations concluded that: European ancestry accounts for 62% of the heritage of the population, followed by the African (21%) and the Native American (17%). The European contribution is highest in Southern Brazil (77%), the African highest in Northeast Brazil (27%) and the Native American is the highest in Northern Brazil (32%).[70]
| Region[70] | European | African | Native American |
|---|---|---|---|
| North Region | 51% | 16% | 32% |
| Northeast Region | 69% | 16% | 15% |
| Central-West Region | 72% | 15% | 12% |
| Southeast Region | 75% | 15% | 10% |
| South Region | 90% | 5% | 5% |
An autosomalDNA study (2011), with nearly 1000 samples from every major race group ("whites", "pardos" and "blacks", according to their respective proportions) all over the country found out a major European contribution, followed by a high African contribution and an important Native American component.[71]
"In all regions studied, the European ancestry was predominant, with proportions ranging from 60.6% in the Northeast to 77.7% in the South". The 2011 autosomal study samples came from blood donors (the lowest classes constitute the great majority of blood donors in Brazil[72]), and also public health institutions personnel and health students.
| Region[71] | European | African | Native American |
|---|---|---|---|
| Northern Brazil | 68.80% | 10.50% | 18.50% |
| Northeast Brazil | 71.10% | 16.30% | 12.40% |
| Southeast Brazil | 74.20% | 17.30% | 7.30% |
| Southern Brazil | 79.50% | 10.30% | 9.40% |
An autosomal study from 2013, with nearly 1300 samples from all of the Brazilian regions, found a predominant degree of European ancestry combined with African and Native American contributions, in varying degrees. 'Following an increasing North to South gradient, European ancestry was the most prevalent in all urban populations (with values up to 74%). The populations in the North consisted of a significant proportion of Native American ancestry that was about two times higher than the African contribution. Conversely, in the Northeast, Center-West and Southeast, African ancestry was the second most prevalent. At an intrapopulation level, all urbanpopulations were highly admixed, and most of the variation in ancestry proportions was observed between individuals within each population rather than among population'.[73]
| Region'[74] | European | African | Native American |
|---|---|---|---|
| North Region | 51% | 17% | 32% |
| Northeast Region | 73% | 16% | 11% |
| Central-West Region | 75% | 15% | 10% |
| Southeast Region | 73% | 17% | 10% |
| South Region | 92% | 3% | 5% |
An autosomal DNA study from 2009 found a similar profile: "all the Brazilian samples (regions) lie more closely to the European group than to the African populations or to the Mestizos from Mexico".[75]
| Region[76] | European | African | Native American |
|---|---|---|---|
| North Region | 60.6% | 21.3% | 18.1% |
| Northeast Region | 77.3% | 16.1% | 6.6% |
| Central-West Region | 70.3% | 19.7% | 10.0% |
| Southeast Region | 67.7% | 25.0% | 7.3% |
| South Region | 91.5% | 4.3% | 4.2% |
A 2015 autosomal genetic study, which also analysed data of 25 studies of 38 different Brazilian populations concluded that: European ancestry accounts for 62% of the heritage of the population, followed by the African (21%) and the Native American (17%). The European contribution is highest in Southern Brazil (77%), the African highest in Northeast Brazil (27%) and the Native American is the highest in Northern Brazil (32%).[70]
| Region[70] | European | African | Native American |
|---|---|---|---|
| North Region | 51% | 16% | 32% |
| Northeast Region | 77% | 16% | 7% |
| Central-West Region | 78% | 14% | 8% |
| Southeast Region | 72% | 19% | 9% |
| South Region | 91% | 5% | 4% |
Pairwise estimates of F(st) among the five Brazilian geopolitical regions suggested little genetic differentiation only between the South and the remaining regions. Estimates of ancestry results are consistent with the heterogeneous genetic profile of Brazilian population, with a major contribution of European ancestry (0.771) followed by African (0.143) and Amerindian contributions (0.085). The described multiplexed SNP panels can be useful tool for bioanthropological studies but it can be mainly valuable to control for spurious results in genetic association studies in admixed populations".[77]
According to another autosomal DNA study from 2008, by the University of Brasília (UnB), European ancestry dominates in the whole of Brazil (in all regions), accounting for 65.90% of heritage of the population, followed by the African contribution (24.80%) and the Native American (9.3%).[78]
São Paulo state, the most populous state in Brazil, with about 40 million people, showed the following composition, according to an autosomal study from 2006: European genes account for 79% of the heritage of the people of São Paulo, 14% are of African origin, and 7% Native American.[79] A study from 2013 found the following composition in São Paulo state: 70% European, 20% African, 6% Asian and 4% Native American.[80] Another study focused on highly admixed populations yielded similar results.[81]
According to the 2022 census, in the South Whites make up 72.6% of the population, Pardo (brown) 21.7%, Blacks 5%, 0.4% Yellow (Asian descent) and 0.3% Indigenous[83]
The South of Brazil is the region with the largest percentage of Whites. According to the 2005 census, people of Whites account for 87% of the population.[67] In colonial times, this region had a very small population.
The region what is nowSouthern Brazil was originally settled byAmerindian peoples, mostlyGuarani andKaingangs.[84] Only a few settlers fromSão Paulo were living there. This situation made the region vulnerable to attacks from neighboring countries. This fact forced the King ofPortugal to decide to populate the region. For this, settlers from the PortugueseAzores islands were sent to the coast in 1617.[85]
To stimulate the immigration to Brazil, the king offered several benefits for the Azorean couples. Between 1748 and 1756, six thousandPortuguese from the Azores moved to the coast ofSanta Catarina. They were mainly newly married who were seeking a better life. At that time, the Azores were one of the poorest regions of Portugal.
They established themselves mainly in theSanta Catarina Island, nowadays the region of Florianópolis. Later, some couples moved toRio Grande do Sul, where they establishedPorto Alegre, the capital. The Azoreans lived on fishing and agriculture, especially flour. They composed over half of Rio Grande do Sul and Santa Catarina's population in the late 18th century.[86] The state ofParaná was settled by colonists from São Paulo due to their proximity (Paraná was part of São Paulo until the mid-19th century).
With the development of cattle in the interior of Rio Grande do Sul, African slaves began arriving in large numbers. By 1822, Africans were 50% of Rio Grande do Sul's population. This number decreased to 25% in 1858 and to only 2.2% in 2015. Most of them came fromAngola.[87]
After independence from Portugal (1822) the Brazilian government started to stimulate the arrival of a new wave of immigrants to settle the South. In 1824 they establishedSão Leopoldo, a German community. Major Schaeffer, a German who was living in Brazil, was sent to Germany in order to bring immigrants. FromRhineland-Palatinate, the Major brought the immigrants and soldiers. Settlers from Germany were brought to work as small farmers, because there were many land holdings without workers.[88]
To attract the immigrants, the Brazilian government had promised large tracts of land, where they could settle with their families and colonize the region. The first years were not easy. Many Germans died of tropical disease, while others left the colonies to find better living conditions. The German colony of São Leopoldo was a disaster. Nevertheless, in the following years, a further 4,830 Germans arrived at São Leopoldo, and then the colony started to develop, with the immigrants establishing the town ofNovo Hamburgo (New Hamburg).[89]
From São Leopoldo and Novo Hamburgo, the German immigrants spread into others areas ofRio Grande do Sul, mainly close to sources of rivers. The whole region ofVale dos Sinos was populated by Germans. During the 1830s and part of the 1840s German immigration to Brazil was interrupted due to conflicts in the country (Ragamuffin War). The immigration restarted after 1845 with the creation of new colonies. The most important ones wereBlumenau, in 1850, andJoinville in 1851, both inSanta Catarina state; these attracted thousands of German immigrants to the region. In the next five decades, other 28 thousand Germans were brought to Rio Grande do Sul to work as small farmers in the countryside.[90] By 1914, it is estimated that 50 thousand Germans settled in this state.
Another immigration boom to this region started in 1875. Communities with Italian immigrants were also created in southern Brazil. The first colonies to be populated by Italians were created in the highlands of Rio Grande do Sul (Serra Gaúcha). These wereGaribaldi andBento Gonçalves. These immigrants were predominantly fromVeneto, in northern Italy. After five years, in 1880, the great numbers of Italian immigrants arriving caused the Brazilian government to create another Italian colony,Caxias do Sul. After initially settling in the government-promoted colonies, many of the Italian immigrants spread themselves into other areas of Rio Grande do Sul seeking further opportunities.[91]
They created many other Italian colonies on their own, mainly in highlands, because the lowlands were already populated by Germans and nativegaúchos. The Italian established many vineyards in the region. Nowadays, the wine produced in these areas of Italian colonization in southern Brazil is much appreciated within the country, though little is available for export. In 1875, the first Italian colonies were established inSanta Catarina, which lies immediately to the north of Rio Grande do Sul. The colonies gave rise to towns such asCriciúma, and later also spread further north, toParaná.
A significant number ofPoles have settled in Southern Brazil. The first immigrants arrived in 1869 and until 1959, it is estimated that over 100,000 Poles migrated to Brazil,[92] 95% of whom were peasants. The State of Paraná received the majority of Polish immigrants, who settled mainly in the region ofCuritiba, in the towns of Mallet, Cruz Machado, São Matheus do Sul, Irati, and União da Vitória.[93]
According to the 2022 census, in the Southeast Whites make up 49.9% of the population, Pardo (brown) 38.7%, Blacks 10.6%, Yellow (Asian descent) 0.7% and Indigenous 0.1%.[83] TheSoutheastern region of Brazil is the most ethnically diverse and most populated part of the country.
Southeast Brazil is home to the oldest Portuguese village in the Americas,São Vicente, São Paulo, established in 1532.[94] The region, since the beginning of its colonization, is amelting pot of Africans, Natives, and Europeans. The Indigenous peoples of the region were enslaved by the Portuguese.
The race mixing between the indigenous females and their European masters produced theBandeirante, the colonial inhabitant ofSão Paulo, who formed expeditions that crossed the interior of Brazil and greatly increased the Portuguese colonial territory. The main language spoken by these people of mixed Indian/Portuguese heritage wasLíngua geral, a language that mixedTupi andPortuguese words.
In the late 17th century the Bandeirantes found gold in the area that nowadays isMinas Gerais. Agold rush took place in Brazil and thousands of Portuguese colonists arrived during this period. The confrontation between the Bandeirantes and the Portuguese for obtaining possession of the mines led to theEmboabas' War.
The Portuguese won the war. The Amerindian culture declined, giving space to a stronger Portuguese cultural domination. In order to control the wealth, the Portuguese Crown moved the capital of Brazil fromSalvador, Bahia toRio de Janeiro. Thousands of African slaves were brought to work in the gold mines.
They were landed in Rio de Janeiro and sent to other regions. By the late 18th century, Rio de Janeiro was an "African city": most of its inhabitants were slaves. No other place in the world had as many slaves since the end of theRoman Empire.[95] In 1808 the Portuguese royal family, fleeing fromNapoleon, took charge in Rio de Janeiro. Some 23,000 Portuguese nobles moved to Brazil. The change in region was significant, becoming more European.
After independence and principally after 1850, Southeast Brazil was "inundated" by European immigrants, who were attracted by the government to replace the African slaves in the coffee plantations. Most immigrants landed in thePort of Santos and have been forwarded to the coffee farms within São Paulo.
The vast majority of the immigrants came from Italy. Brazil attracted nearly 5 million immigrants between 1870 and 1953. The large number of Italians are visible in many parts of Southeast Brazil. Their descendants are nowadays predominant in many areas. For example, Northeast São Paulo is 45% Italian.[96]
The arrival of immigrants from several parts of Europe, theMiddle-East and Asia produced an ethnically diverse population. The city ofBastos, in São Paulo, is 11.4%Japanese. The city of São Paulo is home to the largest Japanese population outside Japan itself.[97]
According to the 2022 census, people reported as "Pardo" (brown) make up 59.6% of the population, Whites 26.7% and Blacks 13.0%.[83]
The ethnic composition of the population starts in the 16th century. The Portuguese settlers brought few women, which led to relationships with the Indian women. Later, interracial relationships occurred between Portuguese males and African females. The coast, in the past the place where millions of African slaves arrived (mostly from modern-dayAngola,Ghana, Nigeria andBenin) to work in sugarcane plantations, is where nowadays there is a predominance ofMulattoes, those of African and European ancestry. In the interior, there is a predominance of Indian and European mixture.[98]
According to the 2022 census, in the North Pardo (brown) make up 67.2% of the population, Whites 20.7%, Blacks 8.8%, Indigenous 3.1% and Yellow (Asian descent) 0.2% .[83]Northern Brazil, largely covered by theAmazon rainforest, is the Brazilian region with the largestAmerindian influences, both in culture and ethnicity. Inhabited by diverse indigenous tribes, this part of Brazil was reached by Portuguese and Spanish colonists in the 17th century, but it started to be populated by non-Indians only in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. The exploitation ofrubber used in the growing industries of automobiles, has emerged a huge migration to the region.
Many people from the poor Northeast Brazil, mostlyCeará, moved to the Amazon area. The contact between the Indians and the northeastern rubbers created the base of the ethnic composition of the region, with its mixed-race majority.
According to the 2022 census, in the Central-West Pardo (brown) make up 52.4% of the population, Whites 37%, Blacks 9.1%, Indigenous 1.2% and Yellow (East-Asian descent) 0.4%.[99]TheCentral-West region of Brazil was inhabited by diverse Indians when the Portuguese arrived in the early 18th century. The Portuguese came to explore the precious stones that were found there. Contact between the Portuguese and the Indians created a mixed-race population. Until the mid-20th century, Central-West Brazil had a very small population. The situation changed with the construction ofBrasília, the new capital of Brazil, in 1960. Many workers were attracted to the region, mostly from northeastern Brazil.
A new wave of settlers started arriving from the 1970s. With the mechanization of agriculture in the South of Brazil, many rural workers of German and Italian origin migrated to Central-West Brazil. In some areas, they are already the majority of the population.
Portuguese is the only official language of Brazil.[100] It is spoken by nearly the entire population and is virtually the only language used in schools, newspapers, radio, TV and for all business and administrative purposes. Moreover, Brazil is the only Portuguese-speaking nation inthe Americas, making the language an important part of Brazilian national identity.
Many Amerindian languages are spoken daily in indigenous communities, primarily in Northern Brazil. Although many of these communities have significant contact with Portuguese,[101] there are incentives stimulating preservation and the teaching of native languages. According toSIL International, 133 Native American languages are currently endangered. Some of the largest indigenous language groups include Arawak, Carib, Macro-Gê and Tupi.[102] In 2006, the municipality ofSão Gabriel da Cachoeira in the region of Cabeça do Cachorro (Northwestern region of the State ofAmazonas), has adopted some indigenous languages as some of its other official languages along with Portuguese.
Other languages are spoken by descendants of immigrants, who are usually bilingual, in small rural communities in Southern Brazil. The most important are theBrazilian German dialects, such asRiograndenser Hunsrückisch and theEast Pomeranian dialect, and also theTalian, based on the ItalianVenetian language. There are also bilingual speakers ofPolish,Ukrainian andRussian in Southern Brazil, especiallyParaná. In the city ofSão Paulo,Levantine,Japanese,Chinese andKorean can be heard in the immigrant neighborhoods, such asLiberdade.Yiddish andHebrew are used by Jewish communities mainly in São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Porto Alegre, Curitiba, Brasília, Belo Horizonte and Recife as well as theVlax Romani dialect byRomani communities all across the nation.
According to theIBGE census 2010[103] 64.6% are Roman Catholics; 24% are Protestants and other Christians, 8% are agnostics,atheists or have no religion, 2% are followers ofSpiritism, and 1% are members of other religions. Some of these religions areJehovah's Witnesses (1,100,000),Latter-day Saints (200,000),Buddhism (215,000),Judaism (86,000), andIslam (27,000).[104] In 2020, it was estimated that 48% were Roman Catholic; 33% Protestant; 14% irreligious; 2% Spiritist; 2% other Christian; 1% Afro-Brazilian religious; and 0.5% other.[105] In another 2020 study by theAssociation of Religion Data Archives, Christians made up 90.77% of the population; among Christians, 70.57% were Roman Catholic; 15.12% Protestant; 12.23% Independents, 0.12% Orthodox, and 0.09% unaffiliated Christian.[106] Kardecist spiritism was the second-largest religion practiced in Brazil as ARDA's 2020 study, with 4.83% of the population. Of its 3.03% irreligious population, 2.59% were agnostic and 0.44% atheist.[106]
Brazil has the largestRoman Catholic population in the world.[107]
Followers of Protestantism are rising in number. Until 1970, the majority of Brazilian Protestants were adherents of "traditional churches", mostlyLutherans,Presbyterians andBaptists. There are 120,000 Episcopalians in 9 dioceses (Anglican Episcopal Church of Brazil). Since then, numbers ofPentecostal and Neopentecostal adherents have increased significantly.
Islam in Brazil was first practiced by African slaves.[108] The Muslim population in Brazil is made up mostly ofArab immigrants.[109]
The largest population of Buddhists in Latin America lives in Brazil, due greatly to Brazil's large Japanese population.
This article incorporates text from this source, which is in thepublic domain.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link) This article incorporatespublic domain material fromThe World Factbook (2025 ed.).CIA. (Archived 2006 edition.)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Related topics | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
