.jpg)
Deliverance is the twenty-third collection by British fashion designerAlexander McQueen, released for the Spring/Summer 2004 season of hiseponymous fashion house. The collection was inspired by the 1969 filmThey Shoot Horses, Don't They?, which portrays desperate participants in adance marathon during theGreat Depression. The collection and accompanying show use the dance marathon concept to express McQueen's exhaustion with fame and the fashion industry.
The collection comprised three distinct phases inspired by the film and theclothing of the Depression: eveningwear recalled the glamour ofOld Hollywood before the crash, colourful sportswear, and faded daywear in utilitarian fabrics evoking exhaustion and hopelessness. McQueen's signature tailoring featured throughout, and he returned to several concepts from previous collections; he also presented new developments such asbias-cut dresses. Menswear drew from 1930s Americanworkwear.
The runway show was staged on 10 October 2003 at theSalle Wagram auditorium in Paris, with production by McQueen's usual creative team. Unlike a traditional fashion show,Deliverance was presented as a faux dance marathon in three phases, with professional dancers accompanying the models and choreography by ballet dancerMichael Clark. Over eighty looks were presented.[a] The show ended with a model feigning collapse in the centre of the stage before being carried offstage.
Critical reception was positive, especially to the runway show, although there was some backlash to the idea of using the Great Depression as inspiration for high-end fashion. Academic analysis has considered the dance marathon theme as a symbol of death and decay, and items fromDeliverance have appeared in exhibitions.
British fashion designerAlexander McQueen was known for his imaginative, sometimes controversial designs, and dramaticfashion shows.[1][2] During his nearly twenty-year career, he explored a broad range of ideas and themes, includinghistoricism,romanticism, femininity, sexuality, and death.[1][2][3] McQueen began his career as an apprentice onSavile Row, which earned him a reputation as an expert tailor.[4][5][6] From 1996 to October 2001, McQueen was – in addition to his responsibilities for his own label – head designer at French fashion houseGivenchy.[7][8][9]
McQueen's personal fixations and interests were a throughline in his career, and he returned to certain ideas and visual motifs repeatedly.[10][11] His collections werehistoricist, in that he adapted historical designs and narratives, and self-referential, in that he revisited and reworked ideas between collections.[12] As acinemaphile, he drew on his favourite films to inspire his collections.[13] McQueen was fascinated with death andmemento mori.[14]
McQueen had a difficult relationship with thefashion industry, which he sometimes described as toxic and suffocating. He was often ambivalent about continuing his work as a designer.[15][16][17] By the mid to late 2000s, he had reached a point of exhaustion with his career, at one point saying, "I go in, I do my business, do the parties, and leave."[18] He told Vassi Chamberlain ofTatler that he felt he was "in a glass box".[19]
Several of McQueen's collections were intended as commentary and critique on the industry.[20]It's a Jungle Out There (Autumn/Winter 1997) used the short lifespan of theThomson's gazelle as ametaphor for the "fragility of a designer's time in the press."[21][22]Voss (Spring/Summer 2001) andWhat A Merry-Go-Round (Autumn/Winter 2001) used imagery associated withinsane asylums andcircuses to portray fashion as chaotic and deranged.[23][24] At the end of his career, McQueen lashed out again withThe Horn of Plenty (Autumn/Winter 2009), which satirised the concept of a runway show and the wastefulness of the fashion cycle.[25][26]
Deliverance (Spring/Summer 2004) is the twenty-third collection McQueen designed for hiseponymous fashion house. The collection was inspired by one of McQueen's favourite films, the 1969 tragedyThey Shoot Horses, Don't They?, which portrays a lengthydance marathon during theGreat Depression. Hoping to win prize money, the desperate participants risk their well-being by dancing for weeks on end, urged on by the well-heeled paying audience and the cold-hearted emcee who runs the show.[27][28][14] The collection and accompanying show use the dance marathon concept to express McQueen's exhaustion with the never-ending need for designers to produce new collections to drive sales.[29] He may also have been speaking about his difficulties with success and fame; Susannah Frankel felt he was thinking of "man's futile quest for capital at the expense of dignity, and of the flawed and ultimately alienating belief that fame, money, or class leads to a better life."[30][28] In a subsequent interview, McQueen described the show as a statement about his feelings aboutAmerica at the time, saying "it's in a scary place".[31]
With this inspiration in mind, the clothing in the collection is a romantic interpretation ofDepression-era fashion across three phases.[32] The first recalled the glamour ofOld Hollywood before thestock market crash that precipitated the Depression.[27][14] The second portion drew onsportswear.[27][33] The final phase returned to silhouettes from the first, but rendered in faded colours and utilitarian fabrics, indicating the exhaustion and despair of the Depression.[27] McQueen's customarily sharp tailoring was relaxed somewhat for the collection in order to allow the models in the runway show to move freely.[14] Because they were meant to be in a dance competition, the men had competitor numbers pinned to their backs.[34]
The first phase mainly comprised glamorouseveningwear as well as shorter cocktail and day dresses.[28][33] Long evening gowns were shown insatin andlamé; in a new development for McQueen, many werecut on the bias to allow the fabric to flow and drape.[33][35] Some had a "mermaid" silhouette: fitted to the body and flared at the bottom, resembling amermaid tail.[33][36] Other dresses had full skirts intulle and feathers.[37] One orange dress was cut so low in the back that it exposed theintergluteal cleft like McQueen's early bumster trousers.[33] There were also 1930s-styleskirt suits and ensembles with satin pants or crystal-studded stockings.[28][38][35]Swarovski crystals, sequins, beads, embroidery, and feathers were all used for embellishments.[27][28][39][35] In this phase, the competitor numbers were rendered in crystal.[34] Some ensembles were accessorised withfeather boas.[40]
The sportswear phase featured bright colours and loud patterns, all with minimal tailoring to encourage movement.[14][27][33][37] Models wore tightbodysuits, sequinnedhotpants, and relaxed casual dresses. For footwear they hadkitten heels ortrainers.[27][28] Some items were inspired bysports jerseys, with patterns ofjersey numbers as a visual motif.[14] Other aesthetic flourishes here included cut-outs,flounces, floral patterns, andracing stripes.[27][28][35]
The daywear in the final phase was intended to suggest exhaustion and hopelessness through a transition todistressed garments inpatchworks of faded colours and patterns.[27][14] Utilitarian fabrics likedenim,jersey, and cottonmadras recalled the 1930sworkwear that was adopted into the clothing style referred to asAmericana.[27][14][40][41] Unusually, these fabrics were used for tightly tailored, sensual designs rather than plain workwear.[37] Some items had inlays of flesh-toned see-through fabric that made the designs look as though they were falling apart.[41] Plain day dresses were given roundedClaudine collars.[35] Floral patterns reappeared on dresses, muted to the point of resemblingwatercolours.[27][32]
The menswear in the collection was taken from workwear and Americana. McQueen drew inspiration from the sailor characters inQuerelle, a 1982 erotic art film, and the pimps and criminals described in the 1948 novelOur Lady of the Flowers.[14][42] The men in the first phase wore muscle shirts and baggy pleated trousers, while in the second, they wore tank tops, shorts, and trainers, in accordance with its more athletic theme.[28]
As was common for McQueen, several items were revisions of concepts from recent seasons. FromThe Dance of the Twisted Bull (Spring/Summer 2002), he returned to lace-uphipster pants and a ruffled, bias-cut dress made of diamond-shaped pieces of fabric sewn together.[43] A chiffon top in the style ofMarie Antoinette returned fromSupercalifragilistic-expialidocious (Autumn/Winter 2002), and moss-green breeches and a black chiffonall-in-one were taken fromScanners (Autumn/Winter 2003).[43]
The runway show forDeliverance was staged on 10 October 2003 at theSalle Wagram auditorium in Paris, which had hosted boxing and dance events in the 19th century.[28][44] The venue had red velvet curtains, crystal chandeliers, wood panelling, and Greek-stylefrescoes on the walls; McQueen added adisco ball for the show.[27][45] The invitation was a cardboard medication packet.[27] Gainsbury & Whiting oversaw production while Katy England managed styling.[44] Joseph Bennett, who had designed all of McQueen's runways sinceNo. 13 (Spring/Summer 1999), returned to handleset design.[46] TheGuido Palau styled hair, whileVal Garland was responsible for make-up.[44]Philip Treacy, McQueen's usual miliner, provided hats.[33]
The show was conceived as a faux dance marathon in three phases, choreographed by ballet dancerMichael Clark with assistance from Les Child.[45][47] McQueen toldParis Mode that he had always wanted to incorporate dance into his productions, and had been inspired by watching a film of Clark's choreography that reminded him of the emotional content in his own shows.[14] The incorporation of choreography was a departure from fashion show norms, and required the casting of professional dancers to be paired with the models, most of whom had minimal dance experience.[45][48]
Clark and Child cast twenty male dancers, most trained incontemporary dance with a fewballet dancers; they were paired in the show with twenty female models.[49][50][34] Casting director Jess Hallett described McQueen as wanting a very specific look for the models, even selecting one woman himself off the street because she had what he thought was "a very 1930s face".[25] McQueen also castKaren Elson, with whom he had worked before, when developing the concept for the show.[51] The training and rehearsal process for the show was two weeks long; Child recalled it as gruelling, especially for the models, most of whom lacked experience with dance.[32][52] Elson sat out the rest of the season's shows in order to complete the training; Child recalled her as being "very keen" and described her performance as "brilliant".[53][52]
For the show, make-up was kept fairly minimal. Models were sprayed with water rather than powdered, and additional cream was added for later phases to make them appear to be shining with sweat. Eye make-up was a variety of bright pastel tones.[54] Men were styled withBrilliantined hair, as was common in the 1930s.[55][56]
The soundtrack comprised a mix ofbig band anddisco songs.[27][28][38] Portions were borrowed from thesoundtracks ofThe Cotton Club (1984) andThe Color Purple (1985).[41] The music was overlaid with occasional sirens and excerpts of the emcee's dialogue fromThey Shoot Horses, Don't They?, such as his exhortation to participants that "they must keep moving, they must keep dancing at all times".[57][34]
At least eighty looks were presented in the runway show, counting womenswear and menswear.[a][37] It was unusually long, with a running time of over twenty minutes.[59] The first phase showcased at least twenty-one pairs of looks. In a subversion of the usual order for fashion shows, there was a focus on eveningwear, which is usually presented last.[38] The show commenced with several couples performing traditionalballroom dancing styles likefoxtrot,rhumba, andtango.[27][28][38] Expressive movements demonstrated the hopeful, energetic attitude of the early stages of a dance marathon, although each couple danced a different style and tempo, creating an underlying discordant effect.[14][60] As the show proceeded, couples walked offstage at intervals and were replaced with others in new ensembles.[61] Karen Elson appeared in a silver sequined dress.[27] The music used in this phase included the 1941Duke Ellington version of thejazz standard "Take the "A" Train" and "Dance, Dance, Dance" (1977) byChic.[28][27][41] This portion concluded with the final couple walking offstage hand in hand.[62]
The stage lights went down for the transition to phase two. Overhead lighting created the shape of an ovalrunning track on the wooden floor.[63] Six couples lined up at the starting line. At the sound of astarting gun, they raced around the track arm in arm, referencing an elimination derby seen in the film.[63][28][33][64] The soundtrack here included a remixed version of "Smells Like Teen Spirit" (1991) byNirvana.[27] At the end of several laps, the couples crowded together, then began to collapse to the floor and the lights went down again.[27][33]
The final phase represented the end of the dance marathon, with performers appearing exhausted, covered in sweat and their hair in disarray.[28][65] The soundtrack here featured a distorted remix of "God Bless the Child" (1939) byBillie Holiday, followed by "Strangers" (1994) byPortishead.[27][65] Karen Elson opened this phase in a floral dress, falling to the ground from the backstage curtains. She was pursued by her partner, who supported her as she lurched around deliriously before dragging her offstage.[66][67] Other pairs followed in the same mode: the women struggling to keep dancing, slumping into their partners' arms, and being dragged offstage one by one.[28][65] Toward the end of this phase, Elson walked onto the stage alone, wearing a distressed version of the silver sequinned column dress from the opening.[30][27][68] She collapsed to the floor where she remained, writhing, as the other dancers staggered offstage.[68] With a final jerk, she stopped moving and the lights went out.[28][65][14]
After a pause, the lights came back up, including the running track; Elson remained on the floor in its centre. Holding hands, the models circled the track for their final walk. McQueen and Clark came out to take their bows, then carried Elson offstage.[52][65]
In the Stanley Kubrick movie "The Shining", [...] the young writer Jack Torrance [...] realises that he is trapped in a fantastical temporal loop and will never leave the Overlook [hotel]. I like to imagine something analogous, if less sinister, about theDeliverance show: I imagine the dancers and models will forever be performing in that theatre, on that night, somehow. It was unforgettable... because it was timeless McQueen.
Contemporary reception toDeliverance was generally positive.[65][69] McQueen received astanding ovation at the runway show, a rarity in fashion.[52][65][70]Andrew Wilson described the audience's reaction as "rapturous".[69]Time called it "the best show of the season" and put it at number 8 on their top 10 fashion moments of 2003.[71] Karen Elson recalled it as an unusually feminine show for McQueen.[72]
The showmanship was a highlight for critics. Writing inVogue, Sarah Mower thought McQueen had returned "the lifeblood" to fashion shows.[37] She called the designs "exquisitely glamorous".[37] InThe Daily Telegraph,Hilary Alexander wrote that McQueen had "cemented his reputation as the king of spectacle" with the show, calling his designs "ingenious".[73]Daphne Merkin atElle felt thatDeliverance was part of a trend for designers to "return to the exuberant idea of fashion as costume".[74] She wrote that it was "characterized by equal parts nostalgia and ironic commentary on the uses of nostalgia".[75]
The collection is well-remembered in retrospect.Dana Thomas wrote that the show "still stands today as his masterpiece".[28] Chloe Fox called it a "brilliant subversion of and tribute to red carpet glamour".[70] Judith Watt thought the "vampish glamour" of the first phase reminded her ofJohn Galliano, another British designer with a theatrical style similar to McQueen.[35] For Hal Rubenstein "what made the performance so memorable was McQueen’s unexpected, wickedly infectious, almost gleeful take on the frenzy."[55]Robert Fairer, who photographed the show, recalled it as "fifteen glorious minutes" in which the audience was fully immersed in the show, to the point of trying to encourage the exhausted models to "recover and continue the dance", despite knowing it was a performance.[34] Knox felt that McQueen had "unearthed the beauty buried at the heart of human adversity".[32] WhenVogue asked various designers about their favourite shows by others, in 2024,Francesco Risso namedDeliverance, saying "It did get into my blood and it will stay with me forever."[76]
Not all reception was positive:Iain Webb wrote that the show "provoked censorious reviews, questioning the designer's motives".[64]Colin McDowell was critical of the use of the Great Depression theme "as a vehicle for selling extremely expensive clothes", sardonically suggesting that the next step for fashion would be usingthe Holocaust "as a marvellous opportunity to sell stripes".[b][57]Claire Wilcox noted the irony of the collection being a commercial success, given the implications of it being a critique of the industry.[40]
.jpg)
McQueen described how he had expressed his thoughts about fashion and celebrity with Elson's pair of silver sequined dresses. He felt the first version exemplified a kind of "untouchable Hollywood glamour" that he found "alienating", whereas he found the second dress "beautiful in a different and more authentic way" because the damage made it more relatable and approachable for most people.[30] Chloe Fox felt that in saying this, McQueen was "deliberately choosing to ignore the irony" of his own success: his skull scarf had become a trendy best-seller, and celebrities were regularly photographed wearing his designs. She quotes McQueen as being dismissive of the collection's inspiration: "Someone else's idea. [They Shoot Horses director]Sydney Pollack done that; I didn't do that. I just filled it up with clothes." Fox thought McQueen's "stubborn otherness" was a rejection of "the fruits of his own labour" that contributed to his later negativity about the industry.[70]
Several commentators identified an underlying theme of the macabre inDeliverance.[14][78][59] Hal Rubenstein cited it as an example of how McQueen found beauty in unlikely and macabre places.[78] Henrique Grimaldi Figueredo felt the collection showed how McQueen connected "beauty rituals and death". For him, the notion that the performance was a dance to exhaustion and collapse indicated themes of sadism and fetishisation of death, but also "Dionysian ecstasy in the face of an imminent disappearance".[79] He compared the collection to a "danse macabre", an allegorical motif of skeletons dancing, reminding the viewer that death comes to all equally in the end.[80][79] Textile curators Clarissa M. Esguerra and Michaela Hansen analysed several elements asmemento mori. A capelet made from black feathers may have been a reference toravens as a symbol of death, which they thought added an "ominous element" to the otherwise glamourous first phase.[14] Some sandal straps were made to look like they were made fromwristwatches; the use of timepieces "acknowledged the passage of time" toward death.[14] Finally, they referred to Elson's collapse as a "danse macabre" providing a "provocative critique of the fashion industry".[14]
McQueen worked with photographerNick Knight to create an editorial photoshoot using looks from the collection called "Blade of Light" forNuméro.[81][82] It reminded fashion theorist Alastair O'Neill of work by eighteenth-century Japanese artistHokusai.[41] O'Neill felt the editorial echoed the "circularity of the race", the film, and the fashion show, representing fashion as equally "decorative as it is destructive."[41]
Esguerra and Hansen identified the patchwork construction of the day suits and chiffon dresses as examples of McQueen's significant technical skills. They felt that McQueen had tailored these item to the body "with both technical and visual finesse".[83]
Several looks fromDeliverance have appeared in editorial photoshoots. ForVogue, Tesh photographed the silver sequined dress, whileCorinne Day photographed one of the floral bias-cut designs.[84]Paolo Roversi photographed Look 8, a black minidress with lace back, and Look 48, the beaded finale dress, for the December 2005 issue, in a shoot McQueen styled himself.[85]Regan Cameron photographedCate Blanchett in the red ball gown from Look 39.
PhotographerNick Knight interviewedKaren Elson, who wore the silver sequined gown, in 2015. She described her experience as a "profoundly beautiful" one, recalling that she had become completely immersed in her character as an "exhausted and delirious" dancer.[66] Her breasts fell out of her dress on the runway during her first dance in the final phase, which she said was not intentional, but felt it was part of the power of the moment.[86] It was, she said, her "favourite ever fashion show experience".[87] It was the second professional showLily Cole walked in, and her first with McQueen; she recalled working with him as an unusual opportunity for performance rather than simply wearing clothes.[88][89]
Although theAlexander McQueen: Savage Beauty exhibition was intended to cover McQueen's entire career, no items from the collection appeared in the original staging.[90] The exhibitionLee Alexander McQueen: Mind, Mythos, Muse, originally staged in 2022, featured several items fromDeliverance owned by theLos Angeles County Museum of Art: a floral dress with ruffled skirt, a patchwork day suit, a black feathered capelet, a pair of black pants, three dresses from the sportswear phase, and four pairs of footwear.[91] TheFashion Institute of Design & Merchandising Museum in Los Angeles owns a copy of Look 58, a day suit.[92]
{{cite magazine}}:Wikipedia Library link in|url=