Degenerate art (German:Entartete Kunst) was a term adopted in the 1920s by theNazi Party in Germany to describemodern art. During the dictatorship ofAdolf Hitler,German modernist art, including many works of internationally renowned artists, was removed from state-owned museums and banned inNazi Germany on the grounds that such art was an "insult to German feeling", un-German,Freemasonic,Jewish, orCommunist in nature. Those identified as degenerate artists were subjected to sanctions that includeddismissal from teaching positions, being forbidden to exhibit or to sell their art, and in some cases being forbidden to produce art.
Degenerate Art also was the title of a1937 exhibition held by the Nazis inMunich, consisting of 650modernist artworks that the Nazis had taken from museums, that were poorly hung alongside graffiti and text labels mocking the art and the artists.[1] Designed to inflame public opinion against modernism, the exhibition subsequently traveled to several other cities in Germany andAustria.
While modern styles of art were prohibited, the Nazis promoted paintings and sculptures that were traditional in manner and that exalted the "blood and soil" values ofracial purity,militarism, andobedience. Similar restrictions were placed upon music, which was expected to betonal and free of anyjazz influences; disapproved music was termeddegenerate music. Films and plays were alsocensored.[2]
Das Magdeburger Ehrenmal (the Magdeburg cenotaph), byErnst Barlach, was declared to be degenerate art due to the "deformity" and emaciation of the figures—corresponding toNordau's theorized connection between "mental and physical degeneration".
The termEntartung (or "degeneracy") had gained currency in Germany by the late 19th century when the critic and authorMax Nordau devised thetheory presented in his 1892 bookDegeneration.[3] Nordau drew upon the writings of thecriminologistCesare Lombroso, whoseThe Criminal Man, published in 1876, attempted to prove that there were "born criminals" whoseatavistic personality traits could be detected by scientifically measuring abnormal physical characteristics. Nordau developed from this premise a critique ofmodern art, explained as the work of those so corrupted and enfeebled by modern life that they have lost the self-control needed to produce coherent works. He attackedAestheticism inEnglish literature and described themysticism of the German composerRichard Wagner and theSymbolist movement inFrench literature as a product of mental pathology. Explaining thepainterliness ofImpressionism as the sign of a diseased visual cortex, he decried modern degeneracy while praising traditional German culture. Despite the fact that Nordau was Jewish and a key figure in theZionist movement (Lombroso was also Jewish), his theory of artistic degeneracy would be seized upon by GermanNazis during theWeimar Republic as a rallying point for their antisemitic and racist demand forAryan purity in art.
Belief in a Germanic spirit—defined as mystical, rural, moral, bearing ancient wisdom, and noble in the face of a tragic destiny—existed long before the rise of the Nazis; Richard Wagner explored such ideas in his writings.[4][5] Beginning before World War I, the well-known German architect and painterPaul Schultze-Naumburg's influential writings, which invoked racial theories in condemning modern art andarchitecture, supplied much of the basis for Adolf Hitler's belief that classicalGreece and theMiddle Ages were the true sources of Aryan art.[6] Schultze-Naumburg subsequently wrote such books asDie Kunst der Deutschen. Ihr Wesen und ihre Werke (The art of the Germans. Its nature and its works) andKunst und Rasse (Art and Race), the latter published in 1928, in which he argued that only racially pure artists could produce a healthy art which upheld timelessideals ofclassical beauty, while racially mixed modern artists produced disordered artworks and monstrous depictions of the human form. By reproducing examples of modern art next to photographs of people with deformities and diseases, he graphically reinforced the idea of modernism as a sickness.[7]Alfred Rosenberg developed this theory inDer Mythos des 20. Jahrhunderts (Myth of the Twentieth Century), published in 1933, which became a best-seller in Germany and made Rosenberg the Party's leading ideological spokesman.[8]
The early 20th century was a period of wrenching changes in the arts. The development ofmodern art at the beginning of the 20th century, albeit with roots going back to the 1860s, denoted a revolutionary divergence from traditional artistic values to ones based on the personal perceptions and feelings of the artists. Under theWeimar government of the 1920s, Germany emerged as a leading center of theavant-garde. It was the birthplace ofExpressionism in painting and sculpture, of theatonal musical compositions ofArnold Schoenberg, and the jazz-influenced work ofPaul Hindemith andKurt Weill. Films such asRobert Wiene'sThe Cabinet of Dr. Caligari (1920) andF. W. Murnau'sNosferatu (1922) brought Expressionism to cinema.
Wilhelm II, who took an active interest in regulating art in Germany, criticizedImpressionism as "gutter painting" (Gossenmalerei)[11] and forbadeKäthe Kollwitz from being awarded a medal for her print seriesA Weavers' Revolt when it was displayed in the Berlin Grand Exhibition of the Arts in 1898.[12] In 1913, the Prussian house of representatives passed a resolution "against degeneracy in art".[11]
The Nazis viewed the culture of theWeimar period with disgust. Their response stemmed partly from a conservativeaesthetic taste and partly from their determination to use culture as a propaganda tool.[13] On both counts, a painting such asOtto Dix'sWar Cripples (1920) was anathema to them. It unsparingly depicts four badly disfigured veterans of theFirst World War, then a familiar sight onBerlin's streets, rendered incaricatured style. (In 1937, it would be displayed in the Degenerate Art exhibition next to a label accusing Dix—himself a volunteer in World War I[14]—of "an insult to the German heroes of the Great War".[15])
Art historian Henry Grosshans says that Hitler "saw Greek and Roman art as uncontaminated by Jewish influences. Modern art was [seen as] an act of aesthetic violence by the Jews against the German spirit. Such was true to Hitler even though onlyLiebermann,Meidner,Freundlich, andMarc Chagall, among those who made significant contributions to the German modernist movement, were Jewish. But Hitler ... took upon himself the responsibility of deciding who, in matters of culture, thought and acted like a Jew."[16] The supposedly "Jewish" nature of all art that was indecipherable, distorted, or that represented "depraved" subject matter was explained through the concept of degeneracy, which held that distorted and corrupted art was a symptom of an inferior race. By propagating the theory of degeneracy, the Nazis combined theirantisemitism with their drive to control the culture, thus consolidating public support for both campaigns.[17]
Once in control of the government, the Nazis moved to suppress modern art styles and to promote art with national and racial themes.[18] Various Weimar-era art personalities, including Renner, Huelsenbeck, and the Bauhaus designers, were marginalized.
In 1930Wilhelm Frick, a Nazi, became Minister for Culture and Education in the state of Thuringia.[19] By his order, 70 mostly Expressionist paintings were removed from the permanent exhibition of the WeimarSchlossmuseum in 1930, and the director of the König Albert Museum in Zwickau,Hildebrand Gurlitt, was dismissed for displaying modern art.[11]
Hitler's rise to power on 30 January 1933, was quickly followed by the censorship of modern art:book burnings were organized, artists and musicians were dismissed from teaching positions, and curators who had shown a partiality for modern art were replaced by Party members.[24] On April 1, 1933, Reich Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels publicly attacked in Volksparole the most important dealer of modern art, Alfred Flechtheim, who, like many dealers and collectors of "degenerate art", was Jewish.[25] In September 1933, theReichskulturkammer (Reich Culture Chamber) was established, withJoseph Goebbels, Hitler'sReichsminister für Volksaufklärung und Propaganda (Reich Minister for Public Enlightenment and Propaganda) in charge. Sub-chambers within the Culture Chamber, representing the individual arts (music, film, literature, architecture, and the visual arts) were created; these were membership groups consisting of "racially pure" artists supportive of the Party, or willing to be compliant. Goebbels made it clear: "In future only those who are members of a chamber are allowed to be productive in our cultural life. Membership is open only to those who fulfill the entrance condition. In this way all unwanted and damaging elements have been excluded."[26] By 1935 the Reich Culture Chamber had 100,000 members.[26]
As dictator, Hitler gave his personal taste in art the force of law to a degree never before seen. Only inStalin'sSoviet Union, whereSocialist Realism was the mandatory style, had a modern state shown such concern with regulation of the arts.[27] In the case of Germany, the model was to beclassical Greek andRoman art, regarded by Hitler as an art whose exterior form embodied an inner racial ideal.[28]
Nonetheless, during 1933–1934 there was some confusion within the Party on the question ofExpressionism. Goebbels and some others believed that the forceful works of such artists asEmil Nolde,Ernst Barlach andErich Heckel exemplified the Nordic spirit; as Goebbels explained, "We National Socialists are not unmodern; we are the carrier of a new modernity, not only in politics and in social matters, but also in art and intellectual matters."[29] However, a faction led byAlfred Rosenberg despised the Expressionists, and the result was a bitter ideological dispute, which was settled only in September 1934, when Hitler declared that there would be no place for modernist experimentation in the Reich.[30] This edict left many artists initially uncertain as to their status. The work of the Expressionist painter Emil Nolde, a committed member of the Nazi party, continued to be debated even after he was ordered to cease artistic activity in 1936.[31] For many modernist artists, such asMax Beckmann,Ernst Ludwig Kirchner, andOskar Schlemmer, it was not until June 1937 that they surrendered any hope that their work would be tolerated by the authorities.[32]
Although books byFranz Kafka could no longer be bought by 1939, works by ideologically suspect authors such asHermann Hesse andHans Fallada were widely read.[33] Mass culture was less stringently regulated than high culture, possibly because the authorities feared the consequences of too heavy-handed interference in popular entertainment.[34] Thus, until the outbreak of the war, mostHollywood films could be screened, includingIt Happened One Night,San Francisco, andGone with the Wind. While performance ofatonal music was banned, the prohibition of jazz was less strictly enforced.Benny Goodman andDjango Reinhardt were popular, and leading British and American jazz bands continued to perform in major cities until the war; thereafter, dance bands officially played "swing" rather than the banned jazz.[35]
Entartete Kunst poster, Berlin, 1938Letter toEmil Nolde in 1941 fromAdolf Ziegler, who declares that Nolde's art is degenerate art, and forbids him to paint
By 1937, the concept of degeneracy was firmly entrenched in Nazi policy. On 30 June of that year Goebbels putAdolf Ziegler, the head ofReichskammer der Bildenden Künste (Reich Chamber of Visual Art), in charge of a six-man commission authorized to confiscate from museums and art collections throughout the Reich, any remaining art deemed modern, degenerate, or subversive. These works were then to be presented to the public in an exhibit intended to incite further revulsion against the "perverse Jewish spirit" penetrating German culture.[36][37]
The exhibit was held on the second floor of a building formerly occupied by the Institute ofArchaeology. Viewers had to reach the exhibit by means of a narrow staircase. The first sculpture was an oversized, theatrical portrait of Jesus, which purposely intimidated viewers as they literally bumped into it in order to enter. The rooms were made of temporary partitions and deliberately chaotic and overfilled. Pictures were crowded together, sometimes unframed, usually hung by cord.
The first three rooms were grouped thematically. The first room contained works considered demeaning of religion; the second featured works by Jewish artists in particular; the third contained works deemed insulting to the women, soldiers and farmers of Germany. The rest of the exhibit had no particular theme.
There were slogans painted on the walls. For example:
Insolent mockery of the Divine under Centrist rule
Revelation of the Jewish racial soul
An insult to German womanhood
The ideal—cretin and whore
Deliberate sabotage of national defense
German farmers—a Yiddish view
The Jewish longing for the wilderness reveals itself—in Germany theNegro becomes the racial ideal of a degenerate art
Madness becomes method
Nature as seen by sick minds
Even museum bigwigs called this the "art of the German people"[39]
Speeches of Nazi party leaders contrasted with artistmanifestos from various art movements, such asDada andSurrealism. Next to many paintings were labels indicating how much money a museum spent to acquire the artwork. In the case of paintings acquired during the post-warWeimarhyperinflation of the early 1920s, when the cost of a kilogram loaf of bread reached 233 billionGerman marks,[40] the prices of the paintings were of course greatly exaggerated. The exhibit was designed to promote the idea that modernism was aconspiracy by people who hated German decency, frequently identified as Jewish-Bolshevist, although only 6 of the 112 artists included in the exhibition were in fact Jewish.[41]
The exhibition program contained photographs of modern artworks accompanied by defamatory text.[42] The cover featured the exhibition title—with the word"Kunst", meaning art, inscare quotes—superimposed on an image ofOtto Freundlich's sculptureDer Neue Mensch.
A few weeks after the opening of the exhibition, Goebbels ordered a second and more thorough scouring of German art collections; inventory lists indicate that the artworks seized in this second round, combined with those gathered prior to the exhibition, amounted to 16,558 works.[43][44]
Coinciding with theEntartete Kunst exhibition, theGroße Deutsche Kunstausstellung (Great German art exhibition) made its premiere amid much pageantry. This exhibition, held at the palatialHaus der deutschen Kunst (House of German Art), displayed the work of officially approved artists such asArno Breker andAdolf Wissel. At the end of four monthsEntartete Kunst had attracted over two million visitors, nearly three and a half times the number that visited the nearbyGroße Deutsche Kunstausstellung.[45]
Avant-garde German artists were branded both enemies of the state and a threat to German culture. Many went into exile.Max Beckmann fled toAmsterdam on the opening day of theEntartete Kunst exhibit.[46]Max Ernst emigrated to America with the assistance ofPeggy Guggenheim.Ernst Ludwig Kirchner committed suicide in Switzerland in 1938.Paul Klee spent his years in exile in Switzerland, yet was unable to obtain Swiss citizenship because of his status as a degenerate artist. A leading German dealer,Alfred Flechtheim, died penniless in exile in London in 1937.
Other artists remained in internal exile.Otto Dix was dismissed from his professorship in Dresden in 1933.[47] He then retreated to the countryside to paint unpeopled landscapes in a meticulous style that would not provoke the authorities.[48] TheReichskulturkammer forbade artists such asEdgar Ende andEmil Nolde from purchasing painting materials. Those who remained in Germany were forbidden to work at universities and were subject to surprise raids by theGestapo in order to ensure that they were not violating the ban on producing artwork; Nolde secretly carried on painting, but using onlywatercolors (so as not to be betrayed by the telltale odor ofoil paint).[49] Although officially no artists were put to death because of their work, those of Jewish descent who did not escape from Germany in time were sent to concentration camps.[50] Others were murdered in theAction T4 (see, for example,Elfriede Lohse-Wächtler).
After the exhibit, only the most valuable paintings were sorted out to be included in the auction held by GalerieTheodor Fischer (auctioneer) in Luzern, Switzerland, on 30 June 1939 at the Grand Hotel National. The sale consisted of artworks seized from German public museums; some pieces from the sale were acquired by museums, others by private collectors such asMaurice Wertheim who acquired the 1888 self-portrait by Vincent van Gogh that was seized from the Neue Staatsgalerie inMunich belonging to today'sBavarian State Painting Collections.[2] Nazi officials took many for their private use: for example,Hermann Göring took 14 valuable pieces, including aVan Gogh and aCézanne. In March 1939, the Berlin Fire Brigade burned about 4,000 paintings, drawings and prints that had apparently little value on the international market. This was an act of unprecedented vandalism, although the Nazis were well used tobook burnings on a large scale.[51][52]
A large amount of "degenerate art" byPicasso,Dalí, Ernst, Klee,Léger andMiró was destroyed in a bonfire on the night of 27 July 1942, in the gardens of theGalerie nationale du Jeu de Paume in Paris.[53] Whereas it was forbidden to export "degenerate art" to Germany, it was still possible to buy and sell artworks of "degenerate artists" in occupied France. TheNazis considered indeed that they should not be concerned by Frenchmen's mental health.[54] As a consequence, many works made by these artists were sold at the main French auction house during the occupation.[55]
The couple Sophie and Emanuel Fohn, who exchanged the works for harmless works of art from their own possession and kept them in safe custody throughout the National Socialist era, saved about 250 works by ostracized artists. The collection survived inSouth Tyrol from 1943 and was handed over to theBavarian State Painting Collections in 1964.[56]
After the collapse of Nazi Germany and the invasion ofBerlin by theRed Army, some artwork from the exhibit was found buried underground. It is unclear how many of these then reappeared in theHermitage Museum inSaint Petersburg, where they still remain.
In 2010, as work began to extend anunderground line fromAlexanderplatz through the historic city centre to theBrandenburg Gate, a number of sculptures from the degenerate art exhibition were unearthed in the cellar of a private house close to the "Rote Rathaus". These included, for example, thebronzecubist-style statue of a female dancer by the artistMarg Moll, and are on display at theNeues Museum.[57][58][59]
TheReichsministerium für Volksaufklärung und Propaganda (Reich Ministry of Public Enlightenment and Propaganda) compiled a 479-page, two-volume typewritten listing of the works confiscated as "degenerate" from Germany's public institutions in 1937–38. In 1996 theVictoria and Albert Museum in London acquired the only known surviving copy of the complete listing. The document was donated to the V&A'sNational Art Library by Elfriede Fischer, the widow of the art dealer Heinrich Robert ("Harry") Fischer. Copies were made available to other libraries and research organisations at the time, and much of the information was subsequently incorporated into a database maintained by the Freie Universität Berlin.[60][61]
A digital reproduction of the entire inventory was published on the Victoria and Albert Museum's website in January 2014. The V&A's publication consists of twoPDFs, one for each of the original volumes. Both PDFs also include an introduction in English and German.[62] An online version of the inventory was made available on the V&A's website in November 2019, with additional features. The new edition usesIIIF page-turning software and incorporates an interactive index arranged by city and museum. The earlier PDF edition remains available too.[63]
The V&A's copy of the full inventory is thought to have been compiled in 1941 or 1942, after the sales and disposals were completed.[64] Two copies of an earlier version of Volume 1 (A–G) also survive in the German Federal Archives in Berlin, and one of these is annotated to show the fate of individual artworks. Until the V&A obtained the complete inventory in 1996, all versions of Volume 2 (G–Z) were thought to have been destroyed.[65] The listings are arranged alphabetically by city, museum and artist. Details include artist surname, inventory number, title and medium, followed by a code indicating the fate of the artwork, then the surname of the buyer or art dealer (if any) and any price paid.[65] The entries also include abbreviations to indicate whether the work was included in any of the variousEntartete Kunst exhibitions (seeDegenerate Art Exhibition) orDer ewige Jude (seeThe Eternal Jew (art exhibition)).[66]
The main dealers mentioned are Bernhard A. Böhmer (or Boehmer),Karl Buchholz,Hildebrand Gurlitt, andFerdinand Möller. The manuscript also contains entries for many artworks acquired by the artist Emanuel Fohn, in exchange for other works.[67]
Neil Levi, writing inThe Chronicle of Higher Education, suggested that the branding of art as "degenerate" was only partly an aesthetic aim of the Nazis. Another was the confiscation of valuable artwork, a deliberate means to enrich the regime.[68]
A Picasso, a play byJeffrey Hatcher based loosely on actual events, is set in Paris 1941 and seesPicasso being asked to authenticate three works for inclusion in an upcoming exhibition of degenerate art.[69][70]
In the 1964 filmThe Train, a German Army colonel attempts to steal hundreds of "degenerate" paintings from Paris before it is liberated during World War II.[71]
^abcKühnel, Anita (2003). "Entartete Kunst".Grove Art Online.
^Goldstein, Robert Justin, and Andrew Nedd (2015).Political Censorship of the Visual Arts in Nineteenth-Century Europe: Arresting Images. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. p. 159.ISBN9780230248700.
^Zalampas, Sherree Owens, 1937– (1990).Adolf Hitler : a psychological interpretation of his views on architecture, art, and music. Bowling Green, Ohio: Bowling Green University Popular Press.ISBN0879724870.OCLC22438356.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link), p. 54
^Boa, Elizabeth, and Rachel Palfreyman (2000).Heimat: a German Dream: Regional Loyalties and National Identity in German Culture, 1890–1990. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 158.ISBN0198159226.
^Kimmelman, Michael (19 June 2014). "The Art Hitler Hated".The New York Review of Books61 (11): 25–26.
Barron, Stephanie, ed. (1991).'Degenerate Art': The Fate of the Avant-Garde in Nazi Germany. New York: Harry N. Abrams, Inc.ISBN0-8109-3653-4
Bradley, W. S. (1986).Emil Nolde and German Expressionism: A Prophet in his Own Land. Ann Arbor, Mich: UMI Research Press.ISBN0-8357-1700-3
Burt, Richard. (1994). "'Degenerate "Art"': Public Aesthetics and the Simulation of Censorship in Postliberal Los Angeles and Berlin" in The Administration of Aesthetics: Censorship, Political Criticism and the Public Sphere. Ed. Richard Burt (Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1994), pp. 216–59.ISBN0-8166-2367-8
Karcher, Eva (1988).Otto Dix 1891–1969: His Life and Works. Cologne: Benedikt Taschen.OCLC21265198
Kraus, Carl; Obermair, Hannes (2019).Mythen der Diktaturen. Kunst in Faschismus und Nationalsozialismus – Miti delle dittature. Arte nel fascismo e nazionalsocialismo. Landesmuseum für Kultur- und Landesgeschichte Schloss Tirol.ISBN978-88-95523-16-3.
Laqueur, Walter (1996).Fascism: Past, Present, Future. New York: Oxford University Press.ISBN0-19-509245-7
Rose, Carol Washton Long (1995).Documents from the End of the Wilhemine Empire to the Rise of National Socialism. San Francisco: University of California Press.ISBN0-520-20264-3
Schulz-Hoffmann, Carla; Weiss, Judith C. (1984).Max Beckmann: Retrospective. Munich: Prestel.ISBN0-393-01937-3
Suslav, Vitaly (1994).The State Hermitage: Masterpieces from the Museum's Collections. vol. 2Western European Art. New York: Harry N. Abrams, Inc.ISBN1-873968-03-5