Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Defeat in detail

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
icon
This articleneeds additional citations forverification. Please helpimprove this article byadding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "Defeat in detail" – news ·newspapers ·books ·scholar ·JSTOR
(October 2011) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
Part of a series on
War
(outline)
Military tactic

Defeat in detail, ordivide and conquer, is amilitary tactic of bringing a large portion of one's own force to bear on small enemy units in sequence, rather than engaging the bulk of the enemy force all at once. This exposes one's own units to many small risks but allows for the eventual destruction of an entire enemy force.[1]

Use

[edit]

In military strategy and tactics, a recurring theme is that units are strengthened by proximity to supporting units. Nearby units can fire on an attacker's flank, lend indirect fire support such asartillery, or maneuver tocounterattack.Defeat in detail is the tactic of exploiting failures of an enemy force to coordinate and support the various smaller units that make up the force. An overwhelming attack on one defending subunit minimizes casualties on the attacking side and can be repeated a number of times against the defending subunits until all are eliminated.

An attacker can successfully conduct the tactic of defeat in detail by exploiting the absolute weaknesses orcomparative disadvantages in the deployment or structure of defending troops, as well as advantages such as maneuvering speed that the defender cannot match. In anasymmetric support structure, A can support B, but unit B cannot support unit A. For example, duringWorld War I, whenhorse cavalry was still in use to some extent, aircraft could support cavalry, but cavalry had little or no ability to support aircraft.

Thus, if a unit is equally suited for use against cavalry and aircraft, using it to eliminate enemy aircraft would have benefits that would last well into future engagements against enemy cavalry units weakened by their lack of support. However, using it against enemy cavalry, while leaving the enemy aircraft intact for subsequent engagements, would bring benefits only during that specific engagement.

Weaknesses of defenders

[edit]
  • Dug-in units that are spread out over so wide a distance that the maximum effective range of their weapons is significantly shorter than the distance between units, which prevents those units from supporting the flanks of neighboring units.
  • Defending units on opposite sides of physical barriers such as hills, forests or rivers (but see the "reverse slope defence" for a historically attested deliberate tactic, now rendered obsolete by crewed and uncrewed aircraft).
  • Defending units whose artillery support is too far to the rear and so cannot effectively engage attackers.
  • Defending units that have no effective communications with their command structure and so cannot request assistance.

Enabling methods

[edit]

The following methods can enable the attacker to defeat the enemy in detail:

  • Attacking one unit faster than other defending units can move to counter-attack.
  • Attacking faster than the defending intelligence, communications, command or control systems can respond (exploiting theOODA loop).
  • Disabling or disrupting systems required for one defending unit to support another (as by attacking communications, command, or control systems with air strikes, artillery attacks, orradio jamming).

Examples

[edit]

Strategic campaigns

[edit]

Tactical examples

[edit]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^Erickson, Edward J (2003).Defeat in Detail: The Ottoman Army in the Balkans, 1912–1913. Praeger Publishers.ISBN 0-275-97888-5.
  2. ^Green, Jeremy (April 1997)."General Napoleon Bonaparte's Italian Campaign". Military History.
  3. ^Webb, Jonathan (2009)."Six Days' Campaign, 1814". theartofbattle.com.; andShosenberg, James W. (30 April 2014)."Napoléon's Six Days". Historynet.com.
  4. ^Edward J. Erickson (2003).Defeat in Detail: The Ottoman Army in the Balkans, 1912-1913. Greenwood Publishing Group. pp. 12–.ISBN 978-0-275-97888-4.
  5. ^John Keegan (31 August 2011).The First World War. Random House. pp. 155–.ISBN 978-1-4070-6412-3.
  6. ^Eric L. Haney; Brian M. Thomsen (6 March 2007).Beyond Shock and Awe: Warfare in the 21st Century. Penguin Publishing Group. pp. 28–.ISBN 978-1-4406-2879-5.
  7. ^Tuunainen, Pasi (2013)."Motti tactics in Finnish military historiography since World War II".International Bibliography of Military History.33 (2). Brill:121–147.doi:10.1163/22115757-03302003. RetrievedMay 13, 2020.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Defeat_in_detail&oldid=1292116879"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp