Deep diving isunderwater diving to a depth beyond the normal range accepted by the associated community. In some cases this is a prescribed limit established by an authority, while in others it is associated with a level of certification or training, and it may vary depending on whether the diving isrecreational,technical orcommercial.Nitrogen narcosis becomes a hazard below 30 metres (98 ft) andhypoxic breathing gas is required below 60 metres (200 ft) to lessen the risk ofoxygen toxicity.

For some recreational diving agencies, "Deep diving", or "Deep diver" may be a certification awarded to divers that have been trained to dive to a specified depth range, generally deeper than 30 metres (98 ft). However, theProfessional Association of Diving Instructors (PADI) defines anything from 18 to 30 metres (59 to 98 ft) as a "deep dive" in the context of recreational diving (other diving organisations vary), and considersdeep diving a form oftechnical diving.^{[1][page needed]} Intechnical diving, a depth below about 60 metres (200 ft) where hypoxicbreathing gas becomes necessary to avoidoxygen toxicity may be considered a deep dive. Inprofessional diving, a depth that requires special equipment, procedures, or advanced training may be considered a deep dive.

Deep diving can mean something else in the commercial diving field. For instance early experiments carried out byCOMEX usingheliox andtrimix attained far greater depths than any recreational technical diving. One example being its "Janus 4" open-sea dive to 501 metres (1,640 ft) in 1977.^[2][3]

The open-sea diving depth record was achieved in 1988 by a team of COMEX and French Navy divers who performed pipeline connection exercises at a depth of 534 metres (1,750 ft) in the Mediterranean Sea as part of the "Hydra 8" programme employingheliox andhydrox. The latter avoids thehigh-pressure nervous syndrome (HPNS) caused by helium and eases breathing due to its lower density.^[2][4][5] These divers needed to breathe special gas mixtures because they were exposed to very high ambient pressure (more than 54 times atmospheric pressure).

Anatmospheric diving suit (ADS) allows very deep dives of up to 700 metres (2,300 ft).^[6] These suits are capable of withstanding the pressure at great depth permitting the diver to remain at normal atmospheric pressure. This eliminates the problems associated with breathing pressurised gases. In 2006 Chief Navy Diver Daniel Jackson set a record of 610 metres (2,000 ft) in an ADS.^[7][8]

On 20 November 1992 COMEX's "Hydra 10" experiment simulated a dive in an onshorehyperbaric chamber withhydreliox.Théo Mavrostomos spent two hours at a simulated depth of 701 metres (2,300 ft).^{[2][9][10][11][12]}

Assumed is the surface of the waterbody to be at or near sea level and underlies atmospheric pressure.

Not included are the differing ranges offreediving – without breathing during a dive.

Deep diving has more hazards and greater risk than basicopen-water diving.^[26]Nitrogen narcosis, the "narks" or "rapture of the deep", starts with feelings of euphoria and over-confidence but then leads to numbness and memory impairment similar toalcohol intoxication.^{[1][page needed]}Decompression sickness, or the "bends", can happen if a diver ascends too rapidly, when excessinert gas leaves solution in the blood and tissues and forms bubbles. These bubbles produce mechanical and biochemical effects that lead to the condition. The onset of symptoms depends on the severity of the tissue gas loading and may develop during ascent in severe cases, but is frequently delayed until after reaching the surface.^{[1][page needed]} Bone degeneration (dysbaric osteonecrosis) is caused by the bubbles forming inside the bones; most commonly the upper arm and the thighs. Deep diving involves a much greater danger of all of these, and presents the additional risk ofoxygen toxicity, which may lead to convulsions underwater. Very deep diving using a helium-oxygen mixture (heliox) or a hydrogen-helium-oxygen mixture (hydreliox) carries the risk ofhigh-pressure nervous syndrome andhydrogen narcosis. Coping with the physical and physiological stresses of deep diving requires goodphysical conditioning.^[27]

Usingopen-circuit scuba equipment, consumption ofbreathing gas is proportional toambient pressure – so at 50 metres (164 ft), where the pressure is 6 bars (87 psi), a diver breathes six times as much as on the surface (1 bar, 14.5 psi). Heavy physical exertion makes the diver breathe even more gas, and gas becomesdenser requiring increased effort to breathe with depth, leading to increased risk ofhypercapnia – an excess ofcarbon dioxide in the blood. The need to dodecompression stops increases with depth. A diver at 6 metres (20 ft) may be able to dive for many hours without needing to do decompression stops. At depths greater than 40 metres (131 ft), a diver may have only a few minutes at the deepest part of the dive before decompression stops are needed. In the event of an emergency, the diver cannot make an immediate ascent to the surface without riskingdecompression sickness. All of these considerations result in the amount of breathing gas required for deep diving being much greater than for shallow open water diving. The diver needs a disciplined approach to planning and conducting dives to minimise these additional risks.

Many of these problems are avoided by the use of surface supplied breathing gas, closeddiving bells, andsaturation diving, at the cost of logistical complexity, reduced maneuverability of the diver, and greater expense.

In ambient pressure diving thework of breathing is a major limitation. Carbon dioxide elimination is limited by the capacity of the diver to cycle breathing gas through the lungs, and when this reaches the maximum, carbon dioxide will build up in the tissues and the diver will succumb to acutehypercapnia. Work of breathing is affected by breathing gas density, which is a function of the gas mixture and the pressure due to depth.^[28][29]

In atmospheric pressure diving the limitations include the ability of the diver to bend the joints of the suit under pressure, and for the joints to remain watertight while bending.

This sectionneeds expansion. You can help byadding to it.(March 2025)

This sectiondoes notcite anysources. Please helpimprove this section byadding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged andremoved.(January 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Both equipment and procedures can be adapted to deal with the problems of greater depth. Usually the two are combined, as the procedures must be adapted to suit the equipment, and in some cases the equipment is needed to facilitate the procedures.

The equipment used for deep diving depends on both the depth and the type of diving.Scuba is limited to equipment that can be carried by the diver or is easily deployed by thedive team, whilesurface-supplied diving equipment can be more extensive, and much of it stays above the water where it is operated by thediving support team.^{[citation needed]}

• Scuba divers carry larger volumes ofbreathing gas to compensate for the increased gas consumption and decompression stops.
• Rebreathers, though more complex, manage gas much more efficiently thanopen-circuit scuba.
• Use ofhelium-based breathing gases such astrimix reducesnitrogen narcosis and reduces thetoxic effects of oxygen at depth.
• Adiving shot, adecompression trapeze, or adecompression buoy can help divers control their ascent and return to the surface at a position that can be monitored by their surface support team at the end of a dive.
• Decompression can beaccelerated by using specially blended breathing gas mixtures containing lower proportions of inert gas.
• Surface supply of breathing gases reduces the risk of running out of gas.
• In-water decompression can be minimized by usingdry bells anddecompression chambers.
• Hot-water suits can preventhypothermia due to the high heat loss when using helium-based breathing gases.
• Diving bells andlockoutsubmersibles expose the diver to the direct underwater environment for less time, and provide a relatively safe shelter that does not require decompression, with a dry environment where the diver can rest, take refreshment, and if necessary, receive first aid in an emergency.
• Breathing gasreclaim systems reduce the cost of using helium-based breathing gases, by recovering and recycling exhaled surface supplied gas, analogous to rebreathers for scuba diving.
• The most radical equipment adaptation for deep diving is to isolate the diver from the direct pressure of the environment, using armouredatmospheric diving suits that allow diving to depths beyond those currently possible at ambient pressure. These rigid, articulated exoskeleton suits are sealed against water and withstand external pressure while providing life support to the diver for several hours at an internal pressure of approximately normal surfaceatmospheric pressure. This avoids the problems ofinert gas narcosis,decompression sickness,barotrauma,oxygen toxicity, highwork of breathing,compression arthralgia,high-pressure nervous syndrome andhypothermia, but at the cost of reduced mobility and dexterity, logistical problems due to the bulk and mass of the suits, and high equipment costs.

Procedural adaptations for deep diving can be classified as those procedures for operating specialized equipment, and those that apply directly to the problems caused by exposure to high ambient pressures.

• The most important procedure for dealing with physiological problems of breathing at high ambient pressures associated with deep diving isdecompression. This is necessary to prevent inert gas bubble formation in the body tissues of the diver, which can cause severe injury.Decompression procedures have been derived for a large range of pressure exposures, using a large range of gas mixtures. These basically entail a slow and controlled reduction in pressure during ascent by using a restricted ascent rate anddecompression stops, so that the inert gases dissolved in the tissues of the diver can be eliminated harmlessly during normal respiration.
• Gas management procedures are necessary to ensure that the diver has access to suitable and sufficient breathing gas at all times during the dive, both for the planned dive profile and for any reasonably foreseeable contingency. Scuba gas management is logistically more complex than surface supply, as the diver must either carry all the gas, must follow a route where previously arranged gas supply depots have been set up (stage cylinders). or must rely on a team of support divers who will provide additional gas at pre-arranged signals or points on the planned dive. On very deep scuba dives or on occasions where long decompression times are planned, it is a common practice for support divers to meet the primary team at decompression stops to check if they need assistance, and these support divers will often carry extra gas supplies in case of need.

• Rebreather diving can reduce the bulk of the gas supplies for long and deep scuba dives, at the cost of more complex equipment with more potential failure modes, requiring more demanding procedures and higher procedural task loading.
• Surface supplied diving distributes the task loading between the divers and the support team, who remain in the relative safety and comfort of the surface control position. Gas supplies are limited only by what is available at the control position, and the diver only needs to carry sufficient bailout capacity to reach the nearest place of safety, which may be adiving bell or lockout submersible.
• Saturation diving is a procedure used to reduce the high-risk decompression a diver is exposed to during a long series of deep underwater exposures. By keeping the diver under high pressure for the whole job, and only decompressing at the end of several days to weeks of underwater work, a single decompression can be done at a slower rate without adding much overall time to the job. During the saturation period, the diver lives in a pressurized environment at the surface, and is transported under pressure to the underwater work site in a closed diving bell.

Amongsttechnical divers, there are divers who participate in ultra-deep diving on scuba below 200 metres (656 ft). This practice requires high levels of training, experience, discipline, fitness and surface support. Only twenty-six people are known to have ever dived to at least 240 metres (790 ft) on self-contained breathing apparatus recreationally.^{[20][30][nb 4][nb 5]} The "Holy Grail" of deep scuba diving was the 300 metres (980 ft) mark, first achieved byJohn Bennett in 2001, and has only been achieved five times since.^{[citation needed]} Due to the short bottom times and long decompression, scuba dives to these depths are generally only done for deep cave exploration or as record attempts.

The difficulties involved in ultra-deep diving are numerous. Although commercial and military divers^{[citation needed]} often operate at those depths, or even deeper, they are surface supplied. All of the complexities of ultra-deep diving are magnified by the requirement of the diver to carry (or provide for) their own gas underwater. These lead to rapid descents and "bounce dives". This has led to extremely high mortality rates amongst those who practice ultra-deep diving.^{[citation needed]} Notable ultra-deep diving fatalities includeSheck Exley,John Bennett,Dave Shaw andGuy Garman.Mark Ellyatt, Don Shirley andPascal Bernabé were involved in serious incidents and were fortunate to survive their dives. Despite the extremely high mortality rate, theGuinness World Records continues to maintain a record for scuba diving^[25] (although the record for deep diving with compressed air has not been updated since 1999, given the high accident rate). Amongst those who do survive significant health issues are reported.Mark Ellyatt is reported to have suffered permanent lung damage;Pascal Bernabé (who was injured on his dive when a light on his mask imploded^[31]) andNuno Gomes reported short to medium term hearing loss.^{[32][unreliable source?]}

Serious issues that confront divers engaging in ultra-deep diving on self-contained breathing apparatus include:

Compression arthralgia

Deep aching pain in the knees, shoulders, fingers, back, hips, neck, and ribs caused by exposure to high ambient pressure at a relatively high rate of descent (i.e., in "bounce dives").

High-pressure nervous syndrome (HPNS)

HPNS, brought on by breathing helium under extreme pressure causestremors,myoclonic jerking,somnolence,EEG changes,^[33]visual disturbance,nausea,dizziness, and decreasedmental performance. Symptoms of HPNS are exacerbated by rapid compression, a feature common to ultra-deep "bounce" dives.

Isobaric counterdiffusion (ICD)

ICD is the diffusion of one inert gas into body tissues while another inert gas is diffusing out. It is a complication that can occur during decompression, and that can result in the formation or growth of bubbles without changes in the environmental pressure.

Decompression algorithm

There are no reliable decompression algorithms tested for such depths on the assumption of an immediate surfacing. Almost all decompression methodology for such depths is based upon saturation, and calculates ascent times in days rather than hours. Accordingly, ultra-deep dives are almost always a partly experimental basis.^{[citation needed]}

In addition, "ordinary" risks like size of gas reserves, hypothermia, dehydration and oxygen toxicity are compounded by extreme depth and exposure and long in-water decompression times. Some technical diving equipment is simply not designed for the greater pressures at these depths, and reports of key equipment (including submersible pressure gauges) imploding are not uncommon.^{[citation needed]}

A severe risk in ultra-deep air diving is deep water blackout, or depth blackout, a loss of consciousness at depths below 50 metres (160 ft) with no clear primary cause, associated withnitrogen narcosis, a neurological impairment with anaesthetic effects caused by high partial pressure of nitrogen dissolved in nerve tissue, and possibly acuteoxygen toxicity.^[72] The term is not in widespread use at present, as where the actual cause of blackout is known, a more specific term is preferred. The depth at which deep water blackout occurs is extremely variable and unpredictable.^[73] Before the popular availability oftrimix, attempts were made to set world record depths using air. The extreme risk of both narcosis and oxygen toxicity in the divers contributed to a high fatality rate in those attempting records. In his book,Deep Diving,Bret Gilliam chronicles the various fatal attempts to set records as well as the smaller number of successes.^[74] From the comparatively few who survived extremely deep air dives:

In deference to the high accident rate, theGuinness World Records have ceased to publish records for deep air dives, after Manion's dive.^[30]

The risk of death in scuba depth record attempts is much greater than for surface-supplied diving to similar depths, where saturation divers do productive work at depths greater than scuba depth records The reasons arephysiological and logistical. Deepsurface-supplied diving is done usingsaturation mode, where the diver is compressed over a long period and can avoid or minimiseinert gas narcosis,high-pressure nervous syndrome (HPNS), andcompression arthralgia, and is decompressed from suturation in the relative comfort and safety of a diving chamber. The saturation diver is provided with an adequate and secure breathing gas supply, wears adiving helmet which protects the airways and is supported by abellman.^{[citation needed]} There is a range of opinions about the value of extreme exposure records, attempted intentionally, and the question may be asked whether the activity has any value beyond merely setting a new record.^[80][81]

A high work of breathing means that the diver has correspondingly less reserve capacity to deal with an incident in which high exertion is necessary to rectify a problem, even for a short time. For example, a sudden loss of buoyancy may require the diver to fin upwards until the problem can be more efficiently managed. If this burst of exertion overwhelms the capacity to eliminate the carbon dioxide that it generates, the diver may be unable to avoid being overwhelmed by hypercapnia.^[82][29]Breathing gas can be optimised for low work of breathing by using higher helium fraction and minimum nitrogen, a small amount of which is needed to limit HPNS in the fast descents used by scuba divers to makegas logistics practicable, and keep the in-water decompression requirements manageable.^[83] Use ofrebreathers can help with gas supply logistics, but inherently increases work of breathing as the gas is circulated through the scrubber by the breathing of the diver. Use of hydrogen in the mixture is experimental, and while it does improve work of breathing, and appears to reduce HPNS, it can only be used at considerable depth due to explosion risks, so the gas logistics are further complicated. Even less data is available on decompressing from exposures to mixtures containing hydroge than trimix and heliox exposures.^[82][84]

Decompression schedules forbounce dive profiles to record depths are experimental and untested, and the decompression risk is basically unknown, and can only be estimated by extrapolation when using current decompression theory. Profiles and schedules used by record holders who survives the dive may be of some use, as they at least worked once,^[82] but no allowance is made for environmental and personal variables, the effects of which are in any case not quantifiable by any currently available decompression algorithm.^[85]

The choice of gas mix for extreme depth on scuba is a compromise between density considerations, which call for minimising nitrogen, narcosis issues, which call for minimising nitrogen, and HPNS considerations, which require some nitrogen and limiting the rate of compression. If hydrogen is considered as an alternative, a possible explosion risk is balanced against less narcosis than nitrogen, lower density, possible reduction of HPNS, and an unknown effect on decompression.^[84][86]

IEDCS is known to occur during ascent after some deep dives, but the causes are uncertain. Inner ear decompression sickness is known to result from isobaric counterdiffusion, but the known triggering conditions do not occur with closed-ircuit rebreathers. Nevertheless the symptoms of intense vertigo and nausea have occurred on both CCR and open circuit dives during ascent, which increase the risk of choking on aspired vomit, and drowning, and are likely to compromise decompression.^[87]

This sectionneeds expansion. You can help byadding to it.(March 2025)

A scuba diver must carry enough breathing gas to manage any single reasonably foreseeable incident and the expected consequences of that incident. There is a choice between the mechanical simplicity and reliability but large mass and volume, and the need for multiple gas switches of open circuit equipment, and the complexity and larger number of possible failure modes, and generally higher work of breathing of CCR, with its smaller mass and volume, and integral gas mixture control.

• Risk denial
• Target fixation
• Dunning–Kruger effect
• Sunk cost

This sectionneeds expansion. You can help byadding to it.(March 2025)

• Number of successful depth record attempts:
• Number of non-fatal failed depth record attempts:
• Number of fatal depth record attempts:

This sectionneeds expansion with: Statistics of fatalities and serious injury during record attempts.. You can help byadding to it.(March 2025)

Diving activities are inherently risky, due to the underwater environment, and the diver manages risk by the appropriate use of equipment, using skills developed by learning, training and practice, along with suitable support by the members of a skilled and prepared team. Scuba diving forgoes some of the most relevant safety equipment and procedures to gain mobility and range, and it is inherently riskier than surface supplied diving for a number of reasons, most notably, the limit on gas supply that the diver can carry.

Attempts to break depth records push the physiological limits, and this reduces the margin for error to the extent the diver may not be able to recover from an incident that could be managed at shallower depths, and the psychological situation may induce a diver to ignore a developing problem until it is too late. Consequently, depth record attempts have a poor safety record, with a high fatality rate.

• Maurice Fargues, a member of the GRS (Groupement de Recherches Sous-marines, Underwater Research Group headed byJacques Cousteau), died in 1947 after losing consciousness at depth in an experiment to see how deep a scuba diver could go. He reached 120 m (394 ft) before failing to return line signals. He became the first diver to die while using anAqua-Lung.^[88][89][90]
• Hope Root died on 3 December 1953 off the coast ofMiami Beach trying set a deep diving record of 125 m (410 ft) with anAqua-Lung; he passed 152 m (500 ft) and was not seen again.^[91]
• Archie Forfar and Ann Gunderson died on 11 December 1971 off the coast ofAndros Island, while attempting to dive to 146 m (479 ft), which would have been the world record at the time. Their third team member, Jim Lockwood, only survived due to his use of a safety weight that dropped when he lost consciousness at 122 m (400 ft), causing him to start an uncontrolled ascent before being intercepted by a safety diver at a depth of around 91 m (300 ft).Sheck Exley, who was acting as another safety diver at 300 feet, inadvertently managed to set the depth record when he descended towards Forfar and Gunderson, who were both still alive at the 480-foot level, although completely incapacitated by narcosis. Exley was forced to give up his attempt at around 142 m (465 ft) when the narcosis very nearly overcame him as well. The bodies of Forfar and Gunderson were never recovered.^[30]
• Sheck Exley died in 1994 at 268 m (879 ft) in an attempt to reach the bottom ofZacatón in a dive that would have extended his own world record (at the time) for deep diving.^[46]
• Dave Shaw died in 2005 in an attempt at the deepest ever body recovery and deepest ever dive on arebreather at 270 m (886 ft).The incident was triggered by difficulties managing the body, which led to overexertion and irreversible hypercapnia due to high work of breathing, possibly aggravated by negative pressure breathing.^[92][93]
• Brigitte Lenoir, planning to attempt the deepest dive ever made by a woman with arebreather to 230 m (750 ft), died on 14 May 2010 inDahab while ascending from a training dive at 147 m (482 ft).^[94]
• Guy Garman died on 15 August 2015 in an unsuccessful attempt to dive to 370 m (1,200 ft).^[95][96] The Virgin Island Police Department confirmed that Guy Garman's body was recovered on 18 August 2015.^[97]
• Theodora Balabanova died at Toroneos Bay, Greece, in September 2017 attempting to break the women's deep dive record with 231 m (758 ft). She did not complete the decompression stops and surfaced too early.^[98]
• Wacław Lejko attempting 275 m (902 ft) inLake Garda, died in September 2017. His body was recovered with anROV at 230 m (750 ft).^[98]
• Adam Krzysztof Pawlik, attempting to break the deep-diving world record of 316 m (1,037 ft) by Jarek Macedoński in Lake Garda, died on 13 October 2018. His body was located at 284 m (932 ft).^[99]
• Sebastian Marczewski was attempting to break the deep-diving world record going below 333 m (1,093 ft) in Lake Garda. He died on 6 July 2019 at 150 m (490 ft).^[100]
• Han Ting, having renewed his own 234 m (768 ft) deepest Asian cave dive record to 277 m (909 ft) in April 2023 in Tianchuang, planned to set a world record for deepest cave dive there, aiming at 300 m (980 ft) on 12 October 2023.^[101] He failed to return from a preparatory dive on 7 October.^[101][102] His body was recovered by anROV on 25 October 2023.^[102]

• Gilliam, Bret (1995).Deep Diving: An Advanced Guide to Physiology, Procedures & Systems (2nd ed.). Watersports Books.ISBN 0-922769-31-1.

• "Dave Not Coming Back directed by Johan Malak" onYouTube

• Underwater diving procedures
• Underwater diving environment
• Technical diving

• CS1: unfit URL
• CS1 French-language sources (fr)
• CS1 German-language sources (de)
• CS1 Italian-language sources (it)
• CS1 Polish-language sources (pl)
• CS1 Brazilian Portuguese-language sources (pt-br)
• CS1 Spanish-language sources (es)
• CS1 Croatian-language sources (hr)
• Wikipedia articles needing clarification from August 2024
• All articles with unsourced statements
• Articles with unsourced statements from April 2009
• Articles with short description
• Short description matches Wikidata
• Wikipedia articles needing page number citations from January 2024
• Articles with unsourced statements from September 2015
• Articles to be expanded from March 2025
• All articles to be expanded
• Articles needing additional references from January 2024
• All articles needing additional references
• Pages with broken anchors
• Pages containing broken anchor template with unsupported parameters
• Articles with unsourced statements from January 2023
• Articles with unsourced statements from January 2024
• Articles with unsourced statements from August 2024
• All articles lacking reliable references
• Articles lacking reliable references from June 2023
• Articles with unsourced statements from December 2016
• Articles with unsourced statements from June 2023
• Articles with unsourced statements from March 2025
• Articles containing French-language text