Bordwell lecturing on the economics of the film industry; his whiteboard diagram shows the oligopoly that existed in the US film industry during theGolden Age of Hollywood.
David Jay Bordwell (/ˈbɔːrdwəl/; July 23, 1947 – February 29, 2024) was an Americanfilm theorist andfilm historian.[1] After receiving his PhD from theUniversity of Iowa in 1973, he wrote more than fifteen volumes on the subject of cinema includingNarration in the Fiction Film (1985),Ozu and the Poetics of Cinema (1988),Making Meaning (1989), andOn the History of Film Style (1997).[2]
With his wifeKristin Thompson, Bordwell wrote the textbooksFilm Art (1979) andFilm History (1994).Film Art, in its 12th edition as of 2019, is still used as a text in introductory film courses. Withaesthetics philosopherNoël Carroll, Bordwell edited the anthologyPost-Theory: Reconstructing Film Studies (1996), a polemic on the state of contemporary film theory. His largest work wasThe Classical Hollywood Cinema: Film Style and Mode of Production to 1960 (1985), written in collaboration with Thompson andJanet Staiger. Several of his more influential articles on theory, narrative, and style were collected inPoetics of Cinema (2007), named in homage to the famous anthology of Russianformalist film theoryPoetika Kino, edited byBoris Eikhenbaum in 1927.
Bordwell spent nearly the entirety of his career as a professor of film at theUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison, retiring in 2004[1] and becoming the Ledoux Professor of Film Studies,Emeritus in the Department of Communication Arts. Film theorists who wrote their dissertations under his advisement include Edward Branigan, Murray Smith, and Carl Plantinga. He and Thompson maintained the blog"Observations on film art" for their ruminations on cinema.
Drawing inspiration from film theorists such as Noel Burch as well as from art historianErnst Gombrich, Bordwell contributed books and articles on classical film theory, the history of art cinema, classical and contemporary Hollywood cinema, and East Asian film style. However, his more influential and controversial works dealt with cognitive film theory (Narration in the Fiction Film being one of the first volumes on this subject),historical poetics of film style, and critiques of contemporary film theory and analysis (Making Meaning andPost-Theory were his two major contributions to this subject).
Bordwell was also associated with a methodological approach known asneoformalism, although this approach has been more extensively written about by his wife,Kristin Thompson.[5] Neoformalism is an approach to film analysis based on observations first made by the literary theorists known as theRussian formalists: that there is a distinction between a film's perceptual and semiotic properties (and that film theorists have generally overstated the role of textual codes in one's comprehension of such basic elements asdiegesis and closure). One scholar has commented that thecognitivist perspective is the central reason why neoformalism earns its prefix (neo) and is not "traditional" formalism.[6] Much of Bordwell's work considers the film-goer's cognitive processes that take place when perceiving the film's nontextual, aesthetic forms. This analysis includes how films guide our attention to salient narrative information, and how films partake in "defamiliarization", a formalist term for how art shows us familiar and formulaic objects and concepts in a manner that encourages us to experience them as if they were new entities.
Neoformalists reject many assumptions and methodologies made by other schools of film study, particularlyhermeneutic (interpretive) approaches, among which he countsLacanianpsychoanalysis and certain variations ofpoststructuralism. InPost-Theory: Reconstructing Film Studies, Bordwell and co-editorNoël Carroll argue against these types of approaches, which they claim act as "Grand Theories" that use films to confirm predetermined theoretical frameworks, rather than attempting mid-level research meant to illuminate how films work. Bordwell and Carroll coined the term "S.L.A.B. theory" to refer to theories that use the ideas ofSaussure,Lacan,Althusser, and/orBarthes.
Bordwell's considerable influence within film studies reached such a point that many of his concepts are reported to "have become part of a theoreticalcanon in film criticism and film academia."[6]
"Textual Analysis, Etc."Enclitic 5:2 / 6:1 (Fall 1981 / Spring 1982); see also "Textual Analysis Revisited"Enclitic 7:1 (Spring 1983) written in response to Lawrence Crawford
"Lowering the Stakes: Prospects for a Historical Poetics of Cinema"Iris 1:1 (1983)
"Mizoguchi and the Evolution of Film Language" inCinema and Language, eds. Stephen Heath and Patricia Mellencamp (AFI 1983)
"A Salt and Battery" (with Kristin Thompson)Film Quarterly, 40:2 (Winter 1986-87; from a polemic between Bordwell/Thompson and Barry Salt regardingThe Classical Hollywood Cinema and Salt's own work on classical Hollywood style and technology
"Adventures in the Highlands of Theory"Screen 29:1 (Winter 1988); from a polemic between Bordwell/Staiger/Thompson and Barry King regarding King's two-part review ofThe Classical Hollywood Cinema
"A Cinema of Flourishes: Japanese Decorative Classicism of the Prewar Era" inDirections in Japanese Cinema, eds.David Desser and Arthur Noletti (Indiana 1992); reprinted inPoetics of Cinema
"Aesthetics in Action: Kung Fu, Gunplay, and Cinematic Expressivity" inFifty Years of Electric Shadows, ed. Law Kar (Urban Council / Hong Kong International Film Festival 1997); reprinted inPoetics of Cinema
"Richness through Imperfection: King Hu and the Glimpse" inTranscending the Times: King Hu and Eileen Chan, ed. Law Kar (Urban Council / Hong Kong International Film Festival 1998); revised forPoetics of Cinema
"Transcultural Spaces: Toward a Poetics of Chinese Film"Post Script 20:2 (2001)
"Film Futures"Substance 97 (2002); reprinted inPoetics of Cinema
"Intensified Continuity: Visual Style in Contemporary American Film"Film Quarterly 55:3 (Spring 2002); revised forThe Way Hollywood Tells It
"Who Blinked First? How Film Style Streamlines Nonverbal Interaction"Style and Story: Essays in Honor of Torben Grodal, eds. Lennard Hojbjerg and Peter Schepelern (Museum Tusulanum Press 2003); reprinted inPoetics of Cinema
"CinemaScope: The Modern Miracle You See without Glasses!" inPoetics of Cinema; an expanded revision of "Schema and Revision: Staging and Composition in Early CinemaScope" inLe CinemaScope Entre art et industrie, ed. Jean-Jacques Meusy (AFRHC 2004)
"Rudolf Arnheim: Clarity, Simplicity, Balance" inArnheim for Film and Media Studies, ed. Scott Higgins (Routledge 2010); an expanded revision ofSimplicity, clarity, balance: A tribute to Rudolf Arnheim fromdavidbordwell.net (June 15, 2007)
Iris 9 (Spring 1989) "Cinema and Cognitive Psychology"; issue edited by Dudley Andrew, featuring essays by Bordwell ("A Case for Cognitivism"), Julian Hochberg, Virginia Brooks, Dirk Eitzen, and Michel Colin; inIris 11 Bordwell responds to Andrew's characterization of cognitive film theory ("A Case for Cognitivism: Further Reflections"), followed by Andrew's reply
Journal of Dramatic Theory and Criticism 6:2 (Spring 1992) "Cognitive Science and Cinema"; supplement edited by Edward S. Small, featuring essays by Bordwell ("Cognition and Comprehension: Viewing and Forgetting inMildred Pierce"), Joseph Anderson, and Calvin Pryluck, as well as Noël Carroll's response to Warren Buckland's review ofMystifying Movies: Fads and Fallacies in Contemporary Film Theory (fromScreen 30:4), a response which the editors ofScreen supposedly refused to print
Film Criticism 17:2-3 (Winter/Spring 1993), "'Film Interpretation, Inc.': Issues in Contemporary Film Studies", issue dedicated toMaking Meaning, featuring essays from Edward Branigan, RIck Altman, David A. Cook, Thomas Elsaesser, Robert B. Ray, and Robin Wood; Bordwell responds in length at the end ("Film Interpretation Revisited")
Style 32:3 (Fall 1998), "Style in Cinema", issue edited by Bordwell, complementingOn the History of Film Style and featuring essays by Noël Carroll, Lea Jacobs, Charles O'Brien, and Scott Higgins