| hag-Gibborim הַגִּבֹּרִ֛ים | |
|---|---|
| Founded | 1010 BCE |
| Disbanded | 970 BCE |
| Country | United Monarchy |
| Allegiance | David |
| Type | Special operations force,shock troops |
| Role | Special operations, Infantry |
| Size | 37 |
| Nickname | David’s Mighty Warriors |
| Commanders | |
| Founder & Commander | David |
David's Mighty Warriors (also known asDavid's Mighty Men or theGibborim;Hebrew:הַגִּבֹּרִ֛ים,romanized: hagGībōrīm,lit. 'the Mighty') are a group of 37 men in theHebrew Bible who fought withKing David and are identified in2 Samuel 23:8–38, part of the "supplementary information" added to theSecond Book of Samuel in its final four chapters. TheInternational Standard Version calls them "David's special forces".[1]
A similar list is given in1 Chronicles 11:10–47 but with several variations and sixteen more names.
The text divides them into "the Three", of which there are three, and "the Thirty", of which there are more than thirty. The text explicitly states that there are 37 individuals in all,[2] but it is unclear whether this refers to The Thirty, which may or may not contain The Three, or the combined total of both groups. The text refers to The Three and The Thirty as though they were both important entities, and not just an arbitrary list of three or 30-plus significant men.
| 2 Samuel 23:8–39 | 1 Chronicles11:10–47 |
|---|---|
| Josheb-basshebeth[a] the Tahkemonite | Jashobeam the Hakmonite |
| Eleazar ben Dodai[b] theAhohite | Eleazar ben Dodo[c] the Ahohite |
| Shammah ben Agee the Hararite | – |
| Abishai ahiJoab benZeruiah | Abshai ahi Joab |
| Benaiah ben Jehoiada | Benaiah ben Jehoiada |
| Asahel ahi Joab | Asahel ahi Joab |
| Elhanan ben Dodo ofBethlehem | Elhanan ben Dodo of Bethlehem |
| Shammah theHarodite[d] | Shammoth theHarorite |
| Elika the Harodite | — |
| Helez the Paltite | Helez the Pelonite |
| Ira ben Ikkesh ofTekoa | Ira ben Ikkesh of Tekoa |
| Abiezer ofAnathoth | Abiezer of Anathoth |
| Mebunnai[e] the Hushathite | Sibbekai the Hushathite |
| Zalmon the Ahohite | Ilai the Ahohite |
| Maharai theNetophathite | Maharai the Netophathite |
| Heleb[f] ben Baanah theNetophathite | Heled ben Baanah the Netophathite |
| Ittai ben Ribai ofGibeah of Benjamin | Ithai ben Ribai of Gibeah of Benjamin |
| Benaiah, aPirathonite[g] | Benaiah the Pirathonite |
| Hiddai[h] of theRavines of Gaash | Hurai of the Ravines of Gaash |
| Abi-Albon theArbathite | Abiel the Arbathite |
| Azmaveth theBarhumite | Azmaveth theBaharumite |
| Eliahba theShaalbonite | Eliahba the Shaalbonite |
| Jonathan, of the sons of Jashen | – |
| – | the sons of Hashem theGizonite |
| Shammah the Hararite[i] | Jonathan ben Shagee[j] the Hararite |
| Ahiam ben Sharar[k] the Ararite | Ahiam ben Sakar the Hararite |
| Eliphelet ben Ahasbai son of theMaakathite | Eliphal ben Ur |
| Eliam benAhithophel theGilonite | — |
| — | Hepher the Mekerathite |
| — | Ahijah the Pelonite |
| Hezrai[l] theCarmelite | Hezro the Carmelite |
| Paarai the Arbite | Naarai ben Ezbai |
| Igal ben Nathan ofZobah | Joel ahi Nathan |
| Bani theGadite[m] | Mibhar ben Hagri |
| Zelek theAmmonite | Zelek the Ammonite |
| Naharai theBeerothite | Naharai theBerothite |
| Ira theIthrite | Ira the Ithrite |
| Gareb theIthrite | Gareb the Ithrite |
| Uriah theHittite | Uriah the Hittite |
| — | Zabad ben Ahlai |
| — | Adina ben Shiza theReubenite |
| — | Hanan ben Maacah |
| — | Joshaphat the Mithnite |
| — | Uzzia theAshterathite |
| — | Shama (ben Hotham theAroerite) |
| — | Jeiel[n] ben Hotham theAroerite |
| — | Jediael ben Shimri |
| — | Joha (ben Shimri) the Tizite |
| — | Eliel (ben Elnaam) the Mahavite |
| — | Jeribai (ben Elnaam) |
| — | Joshaviah ben Elnaam |
| — | Ithmah theMoabite |
| — | Eliel[o] |
| — | Obed |
| — | Jaasiel the Mezobaite |
The Three are Ishbaal the Tahkemonite,Eleazar son of Dodo the Ahohite, andShammah son of Agee the Hararite.[4]
TheBook of Chronicles also mentions the Three. According to one reading, the first of these three is named asJashobeam instead. However, theSeptuagint version of the same passage presents a name that scholars regard as clearly being atransliteration fromIsbosheth— the euphemism employed in some parts of the Bible for the nameIshbaal. Hence, the first member of The Three was possibly Ishbaal,Saul's son and heir; the text had become corrupted either deliberately (e.g. due to an editor who sought to downplay Ishbaal's heroism) or accidentally.[5] According to other translations following the Masoretic text more closely, Jashobeam is the head of "thirty" or "chief officers" but not even part of the Three.
.png)
Ishbaal is described as being the leader and is said to have killed 800 men in a single encounter. Ishbaal is also described as a Tahkemonite, which is probably a corruption ofHacmonite, the latter being how he is described by the Book of Chronicles.
Eleazar is described as standing his ground against thePhilistines atPas Dammim when the rest of theHebrews ran away and as successfully defeated them. Similarly, Shammah is described as having stood his ground when the Philistines attacked a "field of ripe lentils" despite the rest of his associates dispersing and as having defeated the attackers.
The Thirty are not heavily described by the text, merely listed. There are several differences between the ancient manuscripts of the list, whether they are of theMasoretic Text or theSeptuagint. Textual scholars generally consider the Septuagint more reliable than the Masoretic Text regarding this list, particularly since the Masoretic Text of Chronicles matches the Septuagint version of the Books of Samuel more closely than the Masoretic version.[6] In addition, there are a few places where it is uncertain whether one person is referred to or if it is two people. The individuals that are clearly identified are:
In addition to these, there are a few cases where an individual is named, and is then followed by a description that is unclear as to whether it refers to them, or whether it refers to an additional unnamed person:
For the remaining names of the list, there are some significant textual issues, the most minor of which being that the Books of Samuel listsPaarai theArbite but the Book of Chronicles listsNaarai son of Exbai instead. The list in Samuel is generally presented in pairs, where each member of a pair comes from a similar location to the other member, but this pattern is broken by Shammah (from Arad), Elika (from Arad), and Helez (from Beth-Palet), who make a trio; in Chronicles, however, Elika isn't even listed.
The final name(s) on the list itself is/are given by the Masoretic Text asJonathan son of Shammah from Arad, but the septuagint hasJonathan, [and] Shammah from Arad; the septuagint implies that the passage was understood to refer to a Jonathan significant enough to need no further qualification, thus probably referring to the Jonathan that elsewhere is described as a son of Saul—which Jonathan being a son of Shammah would contradict.
According to textual scholars Jonathan is distinctly associated by other parts of the Books of Samuel with theHebrews, while Saul is distinctly associated with theIsraelites (who the text consistently treats as a distinct group from the Hebrews), and his being Saul's son is considered by some textual scholars as moreethnological than necessarily literal.[9][page needed][failed verification]
It is more likely that this wasJonathan the son of Shemea, David’s brother mentioned in1 Chronicles 20:7 as having defeated a Philistine giant.
As the list is proceeded with...David put him in command of his bodyguard. Asahel, brother of Joab. Among the thirty were....., anAsahel the brother ofJoab is sometimes considered to be part of the list, having become misplaced rather than the start of a lost passage.[10]
The text also contains a narrative passage about "three of The Thirty". It is unclear from the text whether this refers to The Three, hence implying that The Three were a special group within The Thirty, or whether it refers to another group of three individuals. The narrative, which recounts a single exploit, ends with "such were the exploits of the three mighty men", and textual scholars believe that the narrative may be an extract from a larger group of tales concerning these three. The flowing narrative differs in style from the more abrupt introductions to individual members of The Three and The Thirty that surround it, and textual scholars believe that it may originally have been from a different document.[11][page needed][failed verification]
In the narrative, three of the thirty visit David when he is located at thecave of Adullam. While there, David expresses a heartfelt desire for water from a well nearBethlehem, which the narrative states was occupied by Philistines. The three of the thirty therefore forcefully break past the Philistines, and draw water from the well, which they take back to David. David refuses to drink the water, instead pouring it out "beforeYahweh", arguing that it was theblood of the men who had risked their lives.[12] Biblical scholars argue that the description of David pouring out the water is a reference to David offering the water to Yahweh as alibation.[6]
An additional account, continuing on from the description of The Three, which was interrupted by the narrative concerning David's thirst, describesAbishai, the brother ofJoab. According to the text, he killed 300 men with a spear, and so became famous among The Thirty, though not as famous and respected as The Three. The text states that despite the fame and respect he was not included among The Three, suggesting that being a part of The Three is not just a group of famous people, but something which an individual could in some way gain membership, with criteria that involved more than fame and honour.
According to most manuscripts of the masoretic text, Abishai became the commander of The Three, but according to theSyriac Peshitta, and a few masoretic text manuscripts, Abishai instead became the commander of The Thirty. The text explicitly states that Abishai became the commander of The Three despite not being among them, but it is unclear whether this is directly because he was their commander (as with the masoretic text), or whether he was commander of The Thirty (as with the Septuagint) and The Three were a subgroup of The Thirty (as possibly implied by the narrative about "three of The Thirty").
Benaiah is singled out by the text for being a particularly great warrior, as famous as The Three, and significantly more respected than any of The Thirty, for which reason he was put in charge of the royalbodyguard. As with Abishai, the text emphasizes that despite these qualities, Benaiah was not a member of The Three. The text gives a list of Benaiah's "great exploits", suggesting that these are what brought him fame and honor; compared with the feats ascribed by the text to Abishai, and to the members of The Three, Benaiah's feats are somewhat minor: