Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

DWI court

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Courts for defendants who plead guilty to driving while intoxicated

DWI courts (sometimes called DUI courts) are a form of court that exists in some United States legal jurisdictions, that use substance-abuse interventions and treatment with defendants who plead guilty ofdriving while intoxicated or impaired. DUI courts may focus on repeat offenders and drivers with very high levels ofblood alcohol at the time of the offense.[1] As of May 2020, there were approximately 269 designated DUI courts in the United States, and approximately 186 hybrid DUI/drug courts that also accept both drug and DUI offenders.[2]

Terminology

[edit]

The term DWI stands fordriving while intoxicated, while the term DUI stands for driving under the influence. Both charges relate to operating a motor vehicle while impaired as the result of the consumption ofalcohol or another intoxicant. The name given to a DWI court may vary depending upon the terminology used in the state for its impaired driving offenses.

Goals

[edit]

DWI courts tend to focus on the most serious cases and repeat offenders, and thus apply strict standards to the cases and defendants that come before them.[2] Drunk and impaired driving offenses involves a substantial risk of harm and death to the driver and to others, as a foreseeable consequence of such conduct.[3] In 1996, DWI cases accounted for 32 percent of motor vehicle traffic fatalities in the United States[4] In 2014, alcohol was involved in 9,967 motor vehicle accident deaths, accounting for 31 percent of all traffic fatalities.[5]

It is estimated that 6.2 percent of adults aged eighteen and older have an alcohol use disorder, characterized by an impaired ability to stop or control alcohol use.[5] DWI courts focus on defendants who are deemed at high risk of re-offending if given a less intensive disposition.[6] DWI courts seek to reduce impaired driving by treatingalcoholism, while requiring offenders to take responsibility for their actions.[2][7]

Studies suggest that DWI courts reduce both DWI recidivism and general criminal recidivism by an average of more than twelve percent, with the most successful DWI courts reducing recidivism by as much as fifty to sixty percent as compared to other forms of sentencing.[8]

Participation

[edit]

Defendants who want DWI court treatment are required to abstain from drinking alcohol.[6] Participants may also be subject to various requirements[9] such as:

  • Random visits from probation or law enforcement officers
  • Attending treatment
  • Participation in recovery support meetings, such asAlcoholics Anonymous
  • Community service
  • Frequent urine analysis or blood alcohol tests[10]
  • Transdermal alcohol detection devices such asSCRAM bracelets[11]
  • Installation of an ignition interlock devices.[12]

Related issues

[edit]

When defining DWI offenses, states and courts must consider whether or not the charge or a specific drunk driving offense should be classified as acrime of violence. If a court rules the incident as acrime of violence, which would result in the charge being treated as an "aggravated" felony for purposes if immigration law.[13][14]

DWI Checkpoints may be used in conjunction with DWI courts to identify and prosecute impaired drivers.[15]

In many jurisdictions, the court in which a DWI case is heard depends on the law enforcement agency that cited the individual and the location of the alleged violation. Cases often begin in a lower court, such as a justice or municipal court. Cases that involves more serious charges or appeals may be moved to a higher trial court.[16][17]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^Sloan, Frank A.; Gifford, Elizabeth J.; Eldred, Lindsey M.; McCutchan, Sabrina A. (December 2016)."Does the probability of DWI arrest fall following participation in DWI and hybrid drug treatment court programs?".Accident Analysis & Prevention.97:197–205.doi:10.1016/j.aap.2016.08.029.PMC 5154895.
  2. ^abc"DWI Courts".NHTSA. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Retrieved11 April 2025.
  3. ^Schuman, Gary (2008). "Dying Under The Influence".Tort Trial & Insurance Practice Law Journal.43:1–62.
  4. ^"National Drunk Driving Crackdown — August 15–September 1, 2008".Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report.57 (31): 854. 8 August 2008.JSTOR 23318693. Retrieved1 March 2018.
  5. ^ab"Alcohol Facts and Statistics".National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. Archived fromthe original on July 9, 2015. Retrieved1 March 2018.
  6. ^abVlavianos, Richard; Floerke, Shaun; Carey, Shannon."DWI Court Research and Best Practices"(PDF).National Association of Drug Court Professionals. Retrieved1 March 2018.[permanent dead link]
  7. ^Hess, Kären M.; Christine Hess Orthmann (2008)."Courts".Introduction to Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice (9 ed.). Cengage Learning. p. 582.ISBN 978-0-495-39090-9.
  8. ^Harron, Ashley (January 2015)."The Bottom Line"(PDF).National Center for DWI Courts. Retrieved1 March 2018.
  9. ^See, e.g.,"Adult DUI/DWI Treatment Court Programs"(PDF).Maryland Drug Courts. Office of Problem- Solving Courts. Retrieved1 March 2018.
  10. ^Olson, Rochelle (30 December 2007)."DWI court succeeds by keeping keen eye on offenders".Star Tribune. Archived fromthe original on 2008-10-10. Retrieved2009-09-25.
  11. ^Nichols, Tison, J.; Casanova-Powell, T.; Chaudhary, N.K. (April 2015)."Comparative study and evaluation of SCRAM use, recidivism rates, and characteristics. (Report No. DOT HS 812 143)"(PDF).National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Retrieved1 March 2018.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  12. ^Kierkus, Christopher A.; Johnson, Brian R. (2015)."Michigan DUI/Sobriety Ignition Interlock Evaluation"(PDF).Foundation for Advancing Alcohol Responsibility. Michigan Association of Drug Court Professionals. Retrieved16 February 2019.
  13. ^Hicks, Eric (April 2011). "Comments on Sentencing Procedures".Federal Sentencing Reporter.23 (4): 265.doi:10.1525/fsr.2011.23.4.265.JSTOR 10.1525/fsr.2011.23.4.265.
  14. ^Davenport, Maria-Teresa (Spring 2006). "Deportation and Driving: Felony Dui and Reckless Driving as Crimes of Violence Following Leocal v. Ashcroft".The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology.96 (3):849–875.JSTOR 40042799.
  15. ^Davis, Robert (May 2012). "Selected International Best Practices in Police Performance Measurement".Center on Quality Policing:37–39.ISBN 9780833069801.JSTOR 10.7249/j.ctt1q60z7.
  16. ^Ahlin, Eileen; Douds, Ann, eds. (2021). "DWI Courts".Taking problem-solving courts to scale: diverse applications of the specialty court model. Lanham Boulder New York London: Lexington Books. p. 53.ISBN 9781793608420.
  17. ^Block, Alan W. (6 June 2016)."Survey of DWI Courts".rosa P. National Highway Traffic Safety Association. Retrieved14 October 2024.

External links

[edit]
Alcohol use and control
Alcohol
use
Alcohol-related
crimes
Alcoholism
Chemistry
Effects
Adverse effects
Health issues
Social issues
History
General
Alcohol
control
Alcohol law
Alcohol prohibition
Sobriety
Alcohol limitation
Addiction medicine
Religion and alcohol
History
Related
Types of courts
By structure
By party
By offense
or dispute
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=DWI_court&oldid=1300570866"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2026 Movatter.jp