Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

DNA

Featured article
Page semi-protected
Listen to this article
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Molecule that carries genetic information
For a non-technical introduction to the topic, seeIntroduction to genetics. For other uses, seeDNA (disambiguation).

The image above contains clickable links
A chromosome and itspackaged long strand of DNA unraveled. The DNA'sbase pairs encode genes, which provide functions. A human DNA can have up to 500 million base pairs with thousands of genes.
The structure of the DNAdouble helix (typeB-DNA). Theatoms in the structure are colour-coded byelement and the detailed structures of twobase pairs are shown in the bottom right.
Simplified diagram
Part of a series on
Genetics
Personalized medicine

Deoxyribonucleic acid (pronunciation;[1]DNA) is apolymer composed of twopolynucleotide chains that coil around each other to form adouble helix. The polymer carriesgenetic instructions for the development, functioning, growth andreproduction of all knownorganisms and manyviruses. DNA andribonucleic acid (RNA) arenucleic acids. Alongsideproteins,lipids and complex carbohydrates (polysaccharides), nucleic acids are one of the four major types ofmacromolecules that are essential for all known forms oflife.

The two DNA strands are known as polynucleotides as they are composed of simplermonomeric units callednucleotides.[2][3] Each nucleotide is composed of one of fournitrogen-containingnucleobases (cytosine [C],guanine [G],adenine [A] orthymine [T]), asugar calleddeoxyribose, and aphosphate group. The nucleotides are joined to one another in a chain bycovalent bonds (known as thephosphodiester linkage) between the sugar of one nucleotide and the phosphate of the next, resulting in an alternatingsugar-phosphate backbone. The nitrogenous bases of the two separate polynucleotide strands are bound together, according tobase pairing rules (A with T and C with G), withhydrogen bonds to make double-stranded DNA. The complementary nitrogenous bases are divided into two groups, the single-ringedpyrimidines and the double-ringedpurines. In DNA, the pyrimidines are thymine and cytosine; the purines are adenine and guanine.

Both strands of double-stranded DNA store the samebiological information. This information isreplicated when the two strands separate. A large part of DNA (more than 98% for humans) isnon-coding, meaning that these sections do not serve as patterns forprotein sequences. The two strands of DNA run in opposite directions to each other and are thusantiparallel. Attached to each sugar is one of four types of nucleobases (orbases). It is thesequence of these four nucleobases along the backbone that encodes genetic information. RNA strands are created using DNA strands as a template in a process calledtranscription, where DNA bases are exchanged for their corresponding bases except in the case of thymine (T), for which RNA substitutesuracil (U).[4] Under thegenetic code, these RNA strands specify the sequence ofamino acids within proteins in a process calledtranslation.

Within eukaryotic cells, DNA is organized into long structures calledchromosomes. Before typicalcell division, these chromosomes are duplicated in the process of DNA replication, providing a complete set of chromosomes for each daughter cell.Eukaryotic organisms (animals,plants,fungi andprotists) store most of their DNA inside thecell nucleus asnuclear DNA, and some in themitochondria asmitochondrial DNA or inchloroplasts aschloroplast DNA.[5] In contrast,prokaryotes (bacteria andarchaea) store their DNA only in thecytoplasm, incircular chromosomes. Within eukaryotic chromosomes,chromatin proteins, such ashistones, compact and organize DNA. These compacting structures guide the interactions between DNA and other proteins, helping control which parts of the DNA are transcribed.

Properties

Chemical structure of DNA;hydrogen bonds shown as dotted lines. Each end of the double helix has an exposed5' phosphate on one strand and an exposed3′ hydroxyl group (—OH) on the other.

DNA is a longpolymer made from repeating units callednucleotides.[6][7] The structure of DNA is dynamic along its length, being capable of coiling into tight loops and other shapes.[8] In all species it is composed of two helical chains, bound to each other byhydrogen bonds. Both chains are coiled around the same axis, and have the samepitch of 34ångströms (3.4 nm). The pair of chains have a radius of 10 Å (1.0 nm).[9] According to another study, when measured in a different solution, the DNA chain measured 22–26 Å (2.2–2.6 nm) wide, and one nucleotide unit measured 3.3 Å (0.33 nm) long.[10] The buoyant density of most DNA is 1.7g/cm3.[11]

DNA does not usually exist as a single strand, but instead as a pair of strands that are held tightly together.[9][12] These two long strands coil around each other, in the shape of adouble helix. The nucleotide contains both a segment of thebackbone of the molecule (which holds the chain together) and anucleobase (which interacts with the other DNA strand in the helix). A nucleobase linked to a sugar is called anucleoside, and a base linked to a sugar and to one or more phosphate groups is called anucleotide. Abiopolymer comprising multiple linked nucleotides (as in DNA) is called apolynucleotide.[13]

The backbone of the DNA strand is made from alternatingphosphate andsugar groups.[14] The sugar in DNA is2-deoxyribose, which is apentose (five-carbon) sugar. The sugars are joined by phosphate groups that formphosphodiester bonds between the third and fifth carbonatoms of adjacent sugar rings. These are known as the3′-end (three prime end), and5′-end (five prime end) carbons, the prime symbol being used to distinguish these carbon atoms from those of the base to which the deoxyribose forms aglycosidic bond.[12]

Therefore, any DNA strand normally has one end at which there is a phosphate group attached to the 5′ carbon of a ribose (the 5′ phosphoryl) and another end at which there is a free hydroxyl group attached to the 3′ carbon of a ribose (the 3′ hydroxyl). The orientation of the 3′ and 5′ carbons along the sugar-phosphate backbone confersdirectionality (sometimes called polarity) to each DNA strand. In anucleic acid double helix, the direction of the nucleotides in one strand is opposite to their direction in the other strand: the strands areantiparallel. The asymmetric ends of DNA strands are said to have a directionality of five prime end (5′ ), and three prime end (3′), with the 5′ end having a terminal phosphate group and the 3′ end a terminal hydroxyl group. One major difference between DNA andRNA is the sugar, with the 2-deoxyribose in DNA being replaced by the related pentose sugarribose in RNA.[12]

A section of DNA. The bases lie horizontally between the two spiraling strands[15] (animated version).

The DNA double helix is stabilized primarily by two forces:hydrogen bonds between nucleotides andbase-stacking interactions amongaromatic nucleobases.[16] The four bases found in DNA areadenine (A),cytosine (C),guanine (G) andthymine (T). These four bases are attached to the sugar-phosphate to form the complete nucleotide, as shown foradenosine monophosphate. Adenine pairs with thymine and guanine pairs with cytosine, formingA-T andG-Cbase pairs.[17][18]

Nucleobase classification

The nucleobases are classified into two types: thepurines,A andG, which are fused five- and six-memberedheterocyclic compounds, and thepyrimidines, the six-membered ringsC andT.[12] A fifth pyrimidine nucleobase,uracil (U), usually takes the place of thymine in RNA and differs from thymine by lacking amethyl group on its ring. In addition to RNA and DNA, many artificialnucleic acid analogues have been created to study the properties of nucleic acids, or for use in biotechnology.[19]

Non-canonical bases

Modified bases occur in DNA. The first of these recognized was5-methylcytosine, which was found in thegenome ofMycobacterium tuberculosis in 1925.[20] The reason for the presence of these noncanonical bases in bacterial viruses (bacteriophages) is to avoid therestriction enzymes present in bacteria. This enzyme system acts at least in part as a molecular immune system protecting bacteria from infection by viruses.[21] Modifications of the bases cytosine and adenine, the more common and modified DNA bases, play vital roles in theepigenetic control of gene expression in plants and animals.[22]

A number of noncanonical bases are known to occur in DNA.[23] Most of these are modifications of the canonical bases plus uracil.

  • ModifiedAdenine
    • N6-carbamoyl-methyladenine
    • N6-methyadenine
  • ModifiedGuanine
    • 7-Deazaguanine
    • 7-Methylguanine
  • ModifiedCytosine
    • N4-Methylcytosine
    • 5-Carboxylcytosine
    • 5-Formylcytosine
    • 5-Glycosylhydroxymethylcytosine
    • 5-Hydroxycytosine
    • 5-Methylcytosine
  • ModifiedThymidine
    • α-Glutamythymidine
    • α-Putrescinylthymine
  • Uracil and modifications
    • Base J
    • Uracil
    • 5-Dihydroxypentauracil
    • 5-Hydroxymethyldeoxyuracil
  • Others
    • Deoxyarchaeosine
    • 2,6-Diaminopurine (2-Aminoadenine)

Grooves

DNA major and minor grooves. The latter is a binding site for theHoechst stain dye 33258.

Twin helical strands form the DNA backbone. Another double helix may be found tracing the spaces, or grooves, between the strands. These voids are adjacent to the base pairs and may provide abinding site. As the strands are not symmetrically located with respect to each other, the grooves are unequally sized. The major groove is 22 ångströms (2.2 nm) wide, while the minor groove is 12 Å (1.2 nm) in width.[24] Due to the larger width of the major groove, the edges of the bases are more accessible in the major groove than in the minor groove. As a result, proteins such astranscription factors that can bind to specific sequences in double-stranded DNA usually make contact with the sides of the bases exposed in the major groove.[25] This situation varies in unusual conformations of DNA within the cell(see below), but the major and minor grooves are always named to reflect the differences in width that would be seen if the DNA was twisted back into the ordinaryB form.

Base pairing

Further information:Base pair
Top, aGC base pair with threehydrogen bonds. Bottom, anAT base pair with two hydrogen bonds. Non-covalent hydrogen bonds between the pairs are shown as dashed lines.

In a DNA double helix, each type of nucleobase on one strand bonds with just one type of nucleobase on the other strand. This is calledcomplementarybase pairing. Purines formhydrogen bonds to pyrimidines, with adenine bonding only to thymine in two hydrogen bonds, and cytosine bonding only to guanine in three hydrogen bonds. This arrangement of two nucleotides binding together across the double helix (from six-carbon ring to six-carbon ring) is called a Watson-Crick base pair. DNA with highGC-content is more stable than DNA with lowGC-content. AHoogsteen base pair (hydrogen bonding the 6-carbon ring to the 5-carbon ring) is a rare variation of base-pairing.[26] As hydrogen bonds are notcovalent, they can be broken and rejoined relatively easily. The two strands of DNA in a double helix can thus be pulled apart like a zipper, either by a mechanical force or hightemperature.[27] As a result of this base pair complementarity, all the information in the double-stranded sequence of a DNA helix is duplicated on each strand, which is vital in DNA replication. This reversible and specific interaction between complementary base pairs is critical for all the functions of DNA in organisms.[7]

ssDNA vs. dsDNA

Most DNA molecules are actually two polymer strands, bound together in a helical fashion by noncovalent bonds; this double-stranded (dsDNA) structure is maintained largely by the intrastrand base stacking interactions, which are strongest forG,C stacks. The two strands can come apart—a process known as melting—to form two single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) molecules. Melting occurs at high temperatures, low salt and highpH (low pH also melts DNA, but since DNA is unstable due to acid depurination, low pH is rarely used).

The stability of the dsDNA form depends not only on theGC-content (%G,C basepairs) but also on sequence (since stacking is sequence specific) and also length (longer molecules are more stable). The stability can be measured in various ways; a common way is themelting temperature (also calledTm value), which is the temperature at which 50% of the double-strand molecules are converted to single-strand molecules; melting temperature is dependent on ionic strength and the concentration of DNA. As a result, it is both the percentage ofGC base pairs and the overall length of a DNA double helix that determines the strength of the association between the two strands of DNA. Long DNA helices with a highGC-content have more strongly interacting strands, while short helices with highAT content have more weakly interacting strands.[28] In biology, parts of the DNA double helix that need to separate easily, such as theTATAATPribnow box in somepromoters, tend to have a highAT content, making the strands easier to pull apart.[29]

In the laboratory, the strength of this interaction can be measured by finding the melting temperatureTm necessary to break half of the hydrogen bonds. When all the base pairs in a DNA double helix melt, the strands separate and exist in solution as two entirely independent molecules. These single-stranded DNA molecules have no single common shape, but some conformations are more stable than others.[30]

Amount

Schematickaryogram of a human. It shows 22homologous chromosomes, both the female (XX) and male (XY) versions of thesex chromosome (bottom right), as well as themitochondrial genome (to scale at bottom left). The blue scale to the left of each chromosome pair (and the mitochondrial genome) shows its length in terms of millions of DNAbase pairs.
Further information:Karyotype

In humans, the total femalediploidnuclear genome per cell extends for 6.37 Gigabase pairs (Gbp), is 208.23 cm long and weighs 6.51 picograms (pg).[31] Male values are 6.27 Gbp, 205.00 cm, 6.41 pg.[31] Each DNA polymer can contain hundreds of millions of nucleotides, such as inchromosome 1. Chromosome 1 is the largest humanchromosome with approximately 220 millionbase pairs, and would be85 mm long if straightened.[32]

Ineukaryotes, in addition tonuclear DNA, there is alsomitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) which encodes certain proteins used by the mitochondria. The mtDNA is usually relatively small in comparison to the nuclear DNA. For example, thehuman mitochondrial DNA forms closed circular molecules, each of which contains 16,569[33][34] DNA base pairs,[35] with each such molecule normally containing a full set of the mitochondrial genes. Each human mitochondrion contains, on average, approximately 5 such mtDNA molecules.[35] Each humancell contains approximately 100 mitochondria, giving a total number of mtDNA molecules per human cell of approximately 500.[35] However, the amount of mitochondria per cell also varies by cell type, and anegg cell can contain 100,000 mitochondria, corresponding to up to 1,500,000 copies of the mitochondrial genome (constituting up to 90% of the DNA of the cell).[36]

Sense and antisense

Further information:Sense (molecular biology)
"Sense and antisense" redirects here. For the TV episode, seeSense and Antisense (Millennium).

ADNA sequence is called a "sense" sequence if it is the same as that of amessenger RNA copy that is translated into protein.[37] The sequence on the opposite strand is called the "antisense" sequence. Both sense and antisense sequences can exist on different parts of the same strand of DNA (i.e. both strands can contain both sense and antisense sequences). In both prokaryotes and eukaryotes, antisense RNA sequences are produced, but the functions of these RNAs are not entirely clear.[38] One proposal is that antisense RNAs are involved in regulatinggene expression through RNA-RNA base pairing.[39]

A few DNA sequences in prokaryotes and eukaryotes, and more inplasmids andviruses, blur the distinction between sense and antisense strands by havingoverlapping genes.[40] In these cases, some DNA sequences do double duty, encoding one protein when read along one strand, and a second protein when read in the opposite direction along the other strand. Inbacteria, this overlap may be involved in the regulation of gene transcription,[41] while in viruses, overlapping genes increase the amount of information that can be encoded within the small viral genome.[42]

Supercoiling

Further information:DNA supercoil

DNA can be twisted like a rope in a process calledDNA supercoiling. With DNA in its "relaxed" state, a strand usually circles the axis of the double helix once every 10.4 base pairs, but if the DNA is twisted the strands become more tightly or more loosely wound.[43] If the DNA is twisted in the direction of the helix, this is positive supercoiling, and the bases are held more tightly together. If they are twisted in the opposite direction, this is negative supercoiling, and the bases come apart more easily. In nature, most DNA has slight negative supercoiling that is introduced byenzymes calledtopoisomerases.[44] These enzymes are also needed to relieve the twisting stresses introduced into DNA strands during processes such astranscription andDNA replication.[45]

Alternative DNA structures

Further information:Molecular Structure of Nucleic Acids: A Structure for Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid,Molecular models of DNA, andDNA structure
From left to right, the structures ofA,B andZ-DNA

DNA exists in many possibleconformations that includeA-DNA,B-DNA, andZ-DNA forms, although only B-DNA and Z-DNA have been directly observed in functional organisms.[14] The conformation that DNA adopts depends on the hydration level, DNA sequence, the amount and direction of supercoiling, chemical modifications of the bases, the type and concentration of metalions, and the presence ofpolyamines in solution.[46]

The first published reports of A-DNAX-ray diffraction patterns—and also B-DNA—used analyses based onPatterson functions that provided only a limited amount of structural information for oriented fibers of DNA.[47][48] An alternative analysis was proposed by Wilkinset al. in 1953 for thein vivo B-DNA X-ray diffraction-scattering patterns of highly hydrated DNA fibers in terms of squares ofBessel functions.[49] In the same journal,James Watson andFrancis Crick presented theirmolecular modeling analysis of the DNA X-ray diffraction patterns to suggest that the structure was a double helix.[9]

Although theB-DNA form is most common under the conditions found in cells,[50] it is not a well-defined conformation but a family of related DNA conformations[51] that occur at the high hydration levels present in cells. Their corresponding X-ray diffraction and scattering patterns are characteristic of molecularparacrystals with a significant degree of disorder.[52][53]

Compared to B-DNA, the A-DNA form is a widerright-handed spiral, with a shallow, wide minor groove and a narrower, deeper major groove. The A form occurs under non-physiological conditions in partly dehydrated samples of DNA, while in the cell it may be produced in hybrid pairings of DNA and RNA strands, and in enzyme-DNA complexes.[54][55] Segments of DNA where the bases have been chemically modified bymethylation may undergo a larger change in conformation and adopt theZ form. Here, the strands turn about the helical axis in a left-handed spiral, the opposite of the more common B form.[56] These unusual structures can be recognized by specific Z-DNA binding proteins and may be involved in the regulation of transcription.[57]

Alternative DNA chemistry

Further information:hypothetical types of biochemistry

For many years,exobiologists have proposed the existence of ashadow biosphere, a postulated microbialbiosphere of Earth that uses radically different biochemical and molecular processes than currently known life. One of the proposals was the existence of lifeforms that usearsenic instead of phosphorus in DNA. A report in 2010 of the possibility in thebacteriumGFAJ-1 was announced,[58][59] though the research was disputed,[59][60] and evidence suggests the bacterium actively prevents the incorporation of arsenic into the DNA backbone and other biomolecules.[61]

Quadruplex structures

Further information:G-quadruplex
DNA quadruplex formed bytelomere repeats. The looped conformation of the DNA backbone is very different from the typical DNA helix. The green spheres in the center represent potassium ions.[62]

At the ends of the linear chromosomes are specialized regions of DNA calledtelomeres. The main function of these regions is to allow the cell to replicate chromosome ends using the enzymetelomerase, as the enzymes that normally replicate DNA cannot copy the extreme 3′ ends of chromosomes.[63] These specialized chromosome caps also help protect the DNA ends, and stop theDNA repair systems in the cell from treating them as damage to be corrected.[64] Inhuman cells, telomeres are usually lengths of single-stranded DNA containing several thousand repeats of a simple TTAGGG sequence.[65]

These guanine-rich sequences may stabilize chromosome ends by forming structures of stacked sets of four-base units, rather than the usual base pairs found in other DNA molecules. Here, four guanine bases, known as aguanine tetrad, form a flat plate. These flat four-base units then stack on top of each other to form a stableG-quadruplex structure.[66] These structures are stabilized by hydrogen bonding between the edges of the bases andchelation of a metal ion in the centre of each four-base unit.[67] Other structures can also be formed, with the central set of four bases coming from either a single strand folded around the bases, or several different parallel strands, each contributing one base to the central structure.

In addition to these stacked structures, telomeres also form large loop structures called telomere loops, or T-loops. Here, the single-stranded DNA curls around in a long circle stabilized by telomere-binding proteins.[68] At the very end of the T-loop, the single-stranded telomere DNA is held onto a region of double-stranded DNA by the telomere strand disrupting the double-helical DNA and base pairing to one of the two strands. Thistriple-stranded structure is called a displacement loop orD-loop.[66]

Branched DNA

Further information:Branched DNA andDNA nanotechnology
Single branchMultiple branches
Branched DNA can form networks containing multiple branches.

In DNA,fraying occurs when non-complementary regions exist at the end of an otherwise complementary double-strand of DNA. However, branched DNA can occur if a third strand of DNA is introduced and contains adjoining regions able to hybridize with the frayed regions of the pre-existing double-strand. Although the simplest example of branched DNA involves only three strands of DNA, complexes involving additional strands and multiple branches are also possible.[69] Branched DNA can be used innanotechnology to construct geometric shapes, see the section onuses in technology below.

Artificial bases

Main article:Nucleic acid analogue

Several artificial nucleobases have been synthesized, and successfully incorporated in the eight-base DNA analogue namedHachimoji DNA. Dubbed S, B, P, and Z, these artificial bases are capable of bonding with each other in a predictable way (S–B and P–Z), maintain the double helix structure of DNA, and be transcribed to RNA. Their existence could be seen as an indication that there is nothing special about the four natural nucleobases that evolved on Earth.[70][71] On the other hand, DNA is tightly related toRNA which does not only act as a transcript of DNA but also performs as molecular machines many tasks in cells. For this purpose it has to fold into a structure. It has been shown that to allow to create all possible structures at least four bases are required for the correspondingRNA,[72] while a higher number is also possible but this would be against the naturalprinciple of least effort.

Acidity

The phosphate groups of DNA give it similaracidic properties tophosphoric acid and it can be considered as astrong acid. It will be fully ionized at a normal cellular pH, releasingprotons which leave behind negative charges on the phosphate groups. These negative charges protect DNA from breakdown byhydrolysis by repellingnucleophiles which could hydrolyze it.[73]

Macroscopic appearance

Impure DNA extracted from an orange

Pure DNA extracted from cells forms white, stringy clumps.[74]

Chemical modifications and altered DNA packaging

Base modifications and DNA packaging

Further information:DNA methylation andChromatin remodeling
cytosine5-methylcytosinethymine
Structure of cytosine with and without the 5-methyl group.Deamination converts 5-methylcytosine into thymine.

The expression of genes is influenced by how the DNA is packaged in chromosomes, in a structure calledchromatin. Base modifications can be involved in packaging, with regions that have low or no gene expression usually containing high levels ofmethylation ofcytosine bases. DNA packaging and its influence on gene expression can also occur by covalent modifications of thehistone protein core around which DNA is wrapped in the chromatin structure or else by remodeling carried out by chromatin remodeling complexes (seeChromatin remodeling). There is, further,crosstalk between DNA methylation and histone modification, so they can coordinately affect chromatin and gene expression.[75]

For one example, cytosine methylation produces5-methylcytosine, which is important forX-inactivation of chromosomes.[76] The average level of methylation varies between organisms—the wormCaenorhabditis elegans lacks cytosine methylation, whilevertebrates have higher levels, with up to 1% of their DNA containing 5-methylcytosine.[77] Despite the importance of 5-methylcytosine, it candeaminate to leave a thymine base, so methylated cytosines are particularly prone tomutations.[78] Other base modifications include adenine methylation in bacteria, the presence of5-hydroxymethylcytosine in thebrain,[79] and theglycosylation of uracil to produce the "J-base" inkinetoplastids.[80][81]

Damage

Further information:DNA damage (naturally occurring),Mutation, andDNA damage theory of aging
Acovalentadduct between ametabolically activated form ofbenzo[a]pyrene, the majormutagen intobacco smoke, and DNA[82]

DNA can be damaged by many sorts ofmutagens, which change theDNA sequence. Mutagens includeoxidizing agents,alkylating agents and also high-energyelectromagnetic radiation such asultraviolet light andX-rays. The type of DNA damage produced depends on the type of mutagen. For example, UV light can damage DNA by producingthymine dimers, which are cross-links between pyrimidine bases.[83] On the other hand, oxidants such asfree radicals orhydrogen peroxide produce multiple forms of damage, including base modifications, particularly of guanosine, and double-strand breaks.[84] A typical human cell contains about 150,000 bases that have suffered oxidative damage.[85] Of these oxidative lesions, the most dangerous are double-strand breaks, as these are difficult to repair and can producepoint mutations,insertions,deletions from the DNA sequence, andchromosomal translocations.[86] These mutations can causecancer. Because of inherent limits in the DNA repair mechanisms, if humans lived long enough, they would all eventually develop cancer.[87][88] DNA damages that arenaturally occurring, due to normal cellular processes that produce reactive oxygen species, the hydrolytic activities of cellular water, etc., also occur frequently. Although most of these damages are repaired, in any cell some DNA damage may remain despite the action of repair processes. These remaining DNA damages accumulate with age in mammalian postmitotic tissues. This accumulation appears to be an important underlying cause of aging.[89][90][91]

Many mutagens fit into the space between two adjacent base pairs, this is calledintercalation. Most intercalators arearomatic and planar molecules; examples includeethidium bromide,acridines,daunomycin, anddoxorubicin. For an intercalator to fit between base pairs, the bases must separate, distorting the DNA strands by unwinding of the double helix. This inhibits both transcription and DNA replication, causing toxicity and mutations.[92] As a result, DNA intercalators may becarcinogens, and in the case of thalidomide, ateratogen.[93] Others such asbenzo[a]pyrene diol epoxide andaflatoxin form DNA adducts that induce errors in replication.[94] Nevertheless, due to their ability to inhibit DNA transcription and replication, other similar toxins are also used inchemotherapy to inhibit rapidly growingcancer cells.[95]

Biological functions

Location of eukaryotenuclear DNA within the chromosomes

DNA usually occurs as linearchromosomes ineukaryotes, andcircular chromosomes inprokaryotes. The set of chromosomes in a cell makes up itsgenome; thehuman genome has approximately 3 billion base pairs of DNA arranged into 46 chromosomes.[96] The information carried by DNA is held in thesequence of pieces of DNA calledgenes.Transmission of genetic information in genes is achieved via complementary base pairing. For example, in transcription, when a cell uses the information in a gene, the DNA sequence is copied into a complementary RNA sequence through the attraction between the DNA and the correct RNA nucleotides. Usually, this RNA copy is then used to make a matchingprotein sequence in a process calledtranslation, which depends on the same interaction between RNA nucleotides. In an alternative fashion, a cell may copy its genetic information in a process calledDNA replication. The details of these functions are covered in other articles; here the focus is on the interactions between DNA and other molecules that mediate the function of the genome.

Genes and genomes

Further information:Cell nucleus,Chromatin,Chromosome,Gene, andNoncoding DNA

Genomic DNA is tightly and orderly packed in the process calledDNA condensation, to fit the small available volumes of the cell. In eukaryotes, DNA is located in thecell nucleus, with small amounts inmitochondria andchloroplasts. In prokaryotes, the DNA is held within an irregularly shaped body in the cytoplasm called thenucleoid.[97] The genetic information in a genome is held within genes, and the complete set of this information in an organism is called itsgenotype. A gene is a unit ofheredity and is a region of DNA that influences a particular characteristic in an organism. Genes contain anopen reading frame that can be transcribed, andregulatory sequences such aspromoters andenhancers, which control transcription of the open reading frame.

In manyspecies, only a small fraction of the total sequence of thegenome encodes protein. For example, only about 1.5% of the human genome consists of protein-codingexons, with over 50% of human DNA consisting of non-codingrepetitive sequences.[98] The reasons for the presence of so muchnoncoding DNA in eukaryotic genomes and the extraordinary differences ingenome size, orC-value, among species, represent a long-standing puzzle known as the "C-value enigma".[99] However, some DNA sequences that do not code protein may still encode functionalnon-coding RNA molecules, which are involved in theregulation of gene expression.[100]

T7 RNA polymerase (blue) producing anmRNA (green) from a DNA template (orange)[101]

Some noncoding DNA sequences play structural roles in chromosomes.Telomeres andcentromeres typically contain few genes but are important for the function and stability of chromosomes.[64][102] An abundant form of noncoding DNA in humans arepseudogenes, which are copies of genes that have been disabled by mutation.[103] These sequences are usually just molecularfossils, although they can occasionally serve as rawgenetic material for the creation of new genes through the process ofgene duplication anddivergence.[104]

Transcription and translation

Further information:Genetic code,Transcription (genetics), andProtein biosynthesis

A gene is a sequence of DNA that contains genetic information and can influence thephenotype of an organism. Within a gene, the sequence of bases along a DNA strand defines amessenger RNA sequence, which then defines one or more protein sequences. The relationship between the nucleotide sequences of genes and theamino-acid sequences of proteins is determined by the rules oftranslation, known collectively as thegenetic code. The genetic code consists of three-letter 'words' calledcodons formed from a sequence of three nucleotides (e.g., ACT, CAG, TTT).

In transcription, the codons of a gene are copied into messenger RNA byRNA polymerase. This RNA copy is then decoded by aribosome that reads the RNA sequence by base-pairing the messenger RNA totransfer RNA, which carries amino acids. Since there are 4 bases in 3-letter combinations, there are 64 possible codons (43 combinations). These encode the twentystandard amino acids, giving most amino acids more than one possible codon. There are also three 'stop' or 'nonsense' codons signifying the end of the coding region; these are the TAG, TAA, and TGA codons, (UAG, UAA, and UGA on the mRNA).

Replication

Further information:DNA replication
DNA replication: The double helix is unwound by ahelicase andtopo­iso­merase. Next, oneDNA polymerase produces theleading strand copy. Another DNA polymerase binds to thelagging strand. This enzyme makes discontinuous segments (calledOkazaki fragments) beforeDNA ligase joins them together.

Cell division is essential for an organism to grow, but, when a cell divides, it must replicate the DNA in its genome so that the two daughter cells have the same genetic information as their parent. The double-stranded structure of DNA provides a simple mechanism forDNA replication. Here, the two strands are separated and then each strand'scomplementary DNA sequence is recreated by anenzyme calledDNA polymerase. This enzyme makes the complementary strand by finding the correct base through complementary base pairing and bonding it onto the original strand. As DNA polymerases can only extend a DNA strand in a 5′ to 3′ direction, different mechanisms are used to copy the antiparallel strands of the double helix.[105] In this way, the base on the old strand dictates which base appears on the new strand, and the cell ends up with a perfect copy of its DNA.

Extracellular nucleic acids

Naked extracellular DNA (eDNA), most of it released by cell death, is nearly ubiquitous in the environment. Its concentration in soil may be as high as 2 μg/L, and its concentration in natural aquatic environments may be as high at 88 μg/L.[106] Various possible functions have been proposed for eDNA: it may be involved inhorizontal gene transfer;[107] it may provide nutrients;[108] and it may act as a buffer to recruit or titrate ions or antibiotics.[109] Extracellular DNA acts as a functional extracellular matrix component in thebiofilms of several bacterial species. It may act as a recognition factor to regulate the attachment and dispersal of specific cell types in the biofilm;[110] it may contribute to biofilm formation;[111] and it may contribute to the biofilm's physical strength and resistance to biological stress.[112]

Cell-free fetal DNA is found in the blood of the mother, and can be sequenced to determine a great deal of information about the developing fetus.[113]

Under the name ofenvironmental DNA eDNA has seen increased use in the natural sciences as a survey tool forecology, monitoring the movements and presence of species in water, air, or on land, and assessing an area's biodiversity.[114][115]

Neutrophil extracellular traps

Main article:Neutrophil extracellular traps

Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) are networks of extracellular fibers, primarily composed of DNA, which allowneutrophils, a type of white blood cell, to kill extracellular pathogens while minimizing damage to the host cells.[116] The process of releasing NETs (NETosis) is a form ofprogrammed cell death that only occurs in neutrophils.[117] Dysregulation of NETosis is associated with both exquisite susceptibility to infection (e.g. extracellular bacteria) as well as autoinflammation.[118]

Interactions with proteins

All the functions of DNA depend on interactions with proteins. Theseprotein interactions can be non-specific, or the protein can bind specifically to a single DNA sequence. Enzymes can also bind to DNA and of these, the polymerases that copy the DNA base sequence in transcription and DNA replication are particularly important.

DNA-binding proteins

Further information:DNA-binding protein
Interaction of DNA (in orange) withhistones (in blue). These proteins' basic amino acids bind to the acidic phosphate groups on DNA.

Structural proteins that bind DNA are well-understood examples of non-specific DNA-protein interactions. Within chromosomes, DNA is held in complexes with structural proteins. These proteins organize the DNA into a compact structure calledchromatin. In eukaryotes, this structure involves DNA binding to a complex of small basic proteins calledhistones, while in prokaryotes multiple types of proteins are involved.[119][120] The histones form a disk-shaped complex called anucleosome, which contains two complete turns of double-stranded DNA wrapped around its surface. These non-specific interactions are formed through basic residues in the histones, makingionic bonds to the acidic sugar-phosphate backbone of the DNA, and are thus largely independent of the base sequence.[121] Chemical modifications of these basic amino acid residues includemethylation,phosphorylation, andacetylation.[122] These chemical changes alter the strength of the interaction between the DNA and the histones, making the DNA more or less accessible totranscription factors and changing the rate of transcription.[123] Other non-specific DNA-binding proteins in chromatin include the high-mobility group proteins, which bind to bent or distorted DNA.[124] These proteins are important in bending arrays of nucleosomes and arranging them into the larger structures that make up chromosomes.[125]

A distinct group of DNA-binding proteins is the DNA-binding proteins that specifically bind single-stranded DNA. In humans, replicationprotein A is the best-understood member of this family and is used in processes where the double helix is separated, including DNA replication, recombination, and DNA repair.[126] These binding proteins seem to stabilize single-stranded DNA and protect it from formingstem-loops or being degraded bynucleases.

The lambda repressorhelix-turn-helix transcription factor bound to its DNA target[127]

In contrast, other proteins have evolved to bind to particular DNA sequences. The most intensively studied of these are the varioustranscription factors, which are proteins that regulate transcription. Each transcription factor binds to one particular set of DNA sequences and activates or inhibits the transcription of genes that have these sequences close to their promoters. The transcription factors do this in two ways. Firstly, they can bind the RNA polymerase responsible for transcription, either directly or through other mediator proteins; this locates the polymerase at the promoter and allows it to begin transcription.[128] Alternatively, transcription factors can bindenzymes that modify the histones at the promoter. This changes the accessibility of the DNA template to the polymerase.[129]

As these DNA targets can occur throughout an organism's genome, changes in the activity of one type of transcription factor can affect thousands of genes.[130] Consequently, these proteins are often the targets of thesignal transduction processes that control responses to environmental changes orcellular differentiation and development. The specificity of these transcription factors' interactions with DNA come from the proteins making multiple contacts to the edges of the DNA bases, allowing them to "read" the DNA sequence. Most of these base-interactions are made in the major groove, where the bases are most accessible.[25]

DNA-modifying enzymes

Nucleases and ligases

Therestriction enzymeEcoRV (green) in a complex with its substrate DNA[131]

Nucleases areenzymes that cut DNA strands by catalyzing thehydrolysis of thephosphodiester bonds. Nucleases that hydrolyse nucleotides from the ends of DNA strands are calledexonucleases, whileendonucleases cut within strands. The most frequently used nucleases inmolecular biology are therestriction endonucleases, which cut DNA at specific sequences. For instance, the EcoRV enzyme shown to the left recognizes the 6-base sequence 5′-GATATC-3′ and makes a cut at the horizontal line. In nature, these enzymes protectbacteria againstphage infection by digesting the phage DNA when it enters the bacterial cell, acting as part of therestriction modification system.[132] In technology, these sequence-specific nucleases are used inmolecular cloning andDNA fingerprinting.

Enzymes calledDNA ligases can rejoin cut or broken DNA strands.[133] Ligases are particularly important inlagging strand DNA replication, as they join the short segments of DNA produced at thereplication fork into a complete copy of the DNA template. They are also used inDNA repair andgenetic recombination.[133]

Topoisomerases and helicases

Topoisomerases are enzymes with both nuclease and ligase activity. These proteins change the amount ofsupercoiling in DNA. Some of these enzymes work by cutting the DNA helix and allowing one section to rotate, thereby reducing its level of supercoiling; the enzyme then seals the DNA break.[44] Other types of these enzymes are capable of cutting one DNA helix and then passing a second strand of DNA through this break, before rejoining the helix.[134] Topoisomerases are required for many processes involving DNA, such as DNA replication and transcription.[45]

Helicases are proteins that are a type ofmolecular motor. They use the chemical energy innucleoside triphosphates, predominantlyadenosine triphosphate (ATP), to break hydrogen bonds between bases and unwind the DNA double helix into single strands.[135] These enzymes are essential for most processes where enzymes need to access the DNA bases.

Polymerases

Polymerases areenzymes that synthesize polynucleotide chains fromnucleoside triphosphates. The sequence of their products is created based on existing polynucleotide chains—which are calledtemplates. These enzymes function by repeatedly adding a nucleotide to the 3′hydroxyl group at the end of the growing polynucleotide chain. As a consequence, all polymerases work in a 5′ to 3′ direction.[136] In theactive site of these enzymes, the incoming nucleoside triphosphate base-pairs to the template: this allows polymerases to accurately synthesize the complementary strand of their template. Polymerases are classified according to the type of template that they use.

In DNA replication, DNA-dependentDNA polymerases make copies of DNA polynucleotide chains. To preserve biological information, it is essential that the sequence of bases in each copy are precisely complementary to the sequence of bases in the template strand. Many DNA polymerases have aproofreading activity. Here, the polymerase recognizes the occasional mistakes in the synthesis reaction by the lack of base pairing between the mismatched nucleotides. If a mismatch is detected, a 3′ to 5′exonuclease activity is activated and the incorrect base removed.[137] In most organisms, DNA polymerases function in a large complex called thereplisome that contains multiple accessory subunits, such as theDNA clamp orhelicases.[138]

RNA-dependent DNA polymerases are a specialized class of polymerases that copy the sequence of an RNA strand into DNA. They includereverse transcriptase, which is aviral enzyme involved in the infection of cells byretroviruses, andtelomerase, which is required for the replication of telomeres.[63][139] For example, HIV reverse transcriptase is an enzyme for AIDS virus replication.[139] Telomerase is an unusual polymerase because it contains its own RNA template as part of its structure. It synthesizestelomeres at the ends of chromosomes. Telomeres prevent fusion of the ends of neighboring chromosomes and protect chromosome ends from damage.[64]

Transcription is carried out by a DNA-dependentRNA polymerase that copies the sequence of a DNA strand into RNA. To begin transcribing a gene, the RNA polymerase binds to a sequence of DNA called a promoter and separates the DNA strands. It then copies the gene sequence into amessenger RNA transcript until it reaches a region of DNA called theterminator, where it halts and detaches from the DNA. As with human DNA-dependent DNA polymerases,RNA polymerase II, the enzyme that transcribes most of the genes in the human genome, operates as part of a largeprotein complex with multiple regulatory and accessory subunits.[140]

Genetic recombination

Further information:Genetic recombination
Structure of theHolliday junction intermediate ingenetic recombination. The four separate DNA strands are coloured red, blue, green and yellow.[141]
A current model of meiotic recombination, initiated by a double-strand break or gap, followed by pairing with an homologous chromosome and strand invasion to initiate the recombinational repair process. Repair of the gap can lead to crossover (CO) or non-crossover (NCO) of the flanking regions. CO recombination is thought to occur by the Double Holliday Junction (DHJ) model, illustrated on the right, above. NCO recombinants are thought to occur primarily by the Synthesis Dependent Strand Annealing (SDSA) model, illustrated on the left, above. Most recombination events appear to be the SDSA type.

A DNA helix usually does not interact with other segments of DNA, and in human cells, the different chromosomes even occupy separate areas in the nucleus called "chromosome territories".[142] This physical separation of different chromosomes is important for the ability of DNA to function as a stable repository for information, as one of the few times chromosomes interact is inchromosomal crossover which occurs duringsexual reproduction, whengenetic recombination occurs. Chromosomal crossover is when two DNA helices break, swap a section and then rejoin.

Recombination allows chromosomes to exchange genetic information and produces new combinations of genes, which increases the efficiency ofnatural selection and can be important in the rapid evolution of new proteins.[143] Genetic recombination can also be involved in DNA repair, particularly in the cell's response to double-strand breaks.[144]

The most common form of chromosomal crossover ishomologous recombination, where the two chromosomes involved share very similar sequences.Non-homologous recombination can be damaging to cells, as it can producechromosomal translocations and genetic abnormalities. The recombination reaction is catalyzed by enzymes known asrecombinases, such asRAD51.[145] The first step in recombination is a double-stranded break caused by either anendonuclease or damage to the DNA.[146] A series of steps catalyzed in part by the recombinase then leads to joining of the two helices by at least oneHolliday junction, in which a segment of a single strand in each helix is annealed to the complementary strand in the other helix. The Holliday junction is a tetrahedral junction structure that can be moved along the pair of chromosomes, swapping one strand for another. The recombination reaction is then halted by cleavage of the junction and re-ligation of the released DNA.[147] Only strands of like polarity exchange DNA during recombination. There are two types of cleavage: east-west cleavage and north–south cleavage. The north–south cleavage nicks both strands of DNA, while the east–west cleavage has one strand of DNA intact. The formation of a Holliday junction during recombination makes it possible for genetic diversity, genes to exchange on chromosomes, and expression of wild-type viral genomes.

Evolution

Further information:RNA world hypothesis

DNA contains the genetic information that allows all forms of life to function, grow and reproduce. However, it is unclear how long in the 4-billion-yearhistory of life DNA has performed this function, as it has been proposed that the earliest forms of life may have used RNA as their genetic material.[148][149] RNA may have acted as the central part of earlycell metabolism as it can both transmit genetic information and carry outcatalysis as part ofribozymes.[150] This ancientRNA world where nucleic acid would have been used for both catalysis and genetics may have influenced theevolution of the current genetic code based on four nucleotide bases. This would occur, since the number of different bases in such an organism is a trade-off between a small number of bases increasing replication accuracy and a large number of bases increasing the catalytic efficiency of ribozymes.[151] However, there is no direct evidence of ancient genetic systems, as recovery of DNA from most fossils is impossible because DNA survives in the environment for less than one million years, and slowly degrades into short fragments in solution.[152] Claims for older DNA have been made, most notably a report of the isolation of a viable bacterium from a salt crystal 250 million years old,[153] but these claims are controversial.[154][155]

Building blocks of DNA (adenine,guanine, and relatedorganic molecules) may have been formed extraterrestrially inouter space.[156][157][158] Complex DNA andRNAorganic compounds oflife, includinguracil,cytosine, andthymine, have also been formed in the laboratory under conditions mimicking those found inouter space, using starting chemicals, such aspyrimidine, found inmeteorites. Pyrimidine, likepolycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), the most carbon-rich chemical found in theuniverse, may have been formed inred giants or in interstellarcosmic dust and gas clouds.[159]

Ancient DNA has been recovered from ancient organisms at a timescale where genome evolution can be directly observed, including from extinct organisms up to millions of years old, such as thewoolly mammoth.[160][161]

Uses in technology

Genetic engineering

Further information:Molecular biology,Nucleic acid methods, andGenetic engineering

Methods have been developed to purify DNA from organisms, such asphenol-chloroform extraction, and to manipulate it in the laboratory, such asrestriction digests and thepolymerase chain reaction. Modernbiology andbiochemistry make intensive use of these techniques in recombinant DNA technology.Recombinant DNA is a man-made DNA sequence that has been assembled from other DNA sequences. They can betransformed into organisms in the form ofplasmids or in the appropriate format, by using aviral vector.[162] Thegenetically modified organisms produced can be used to produce products such as recombinantproteins, used inmedical research,[163] or be grown inagriculture.[164][165]

DNA profiling

Further information:DNA profiling

Forensic scientists can use DNA inblood,semen,skin,saliva orhair found at acrime scene to identify a matching DNA of an individual, such as a perpetrator.[166] This process is formally termedDNA profiling, also calledDNA fingerprinting. In DNA profiling, the lengths of variable sections of repetitive DNA, such asshort tandem repeats andminisatellites, are compared between people. This method is usually an extremely reliable technique for identifying a matching DNA.[167] However, identification can be complicated if the scene is contaminated with DNA from several people.[168] DNA profiling was developed in 1984 by British geneticist SirAlec Jeffreys,[169] and first used in forensic science to convict Colin Pitchfork in the 1988Enderby murders case.[170]

The development of forensic science and the ability to now obtain genetic matching on minute samples of blood, skin, saliva, or hair has led to re-examining many cases. Evidence can now be uncovered that was scientifically impossible at the time of the original examination. Combined with the removal of thedouble jeopardy law in some places, this can allow cases to be reopened where prior trials have failed to produce sufficient evidence to convince a jury. People charged with serious crimes may be required to provide a sample of DNA for matching purposes. The most obvious defense to DNA matches obtained forensically is to claim that cross-contamination of evidence has occurred. This has resulted in meticulous strict handling procedures with new cases of serious crime.

DNA profiling is also used successfully to positively identify victims of mass casualty incidents,[171] bodies or body parts in serious accidents, and individual victims in mass war graves, via matching to family members.

DNA profiling is also used inDNA paternity testing to determine if someone is the biological parent or grandparent of a child with the probability of parentage is typically 99.99% when the alleged parent is biologically related to the child. UsuallyDNA sequencing are carried out after birth, but there are new methods to test paternity while a mother is still pregnant.[172]

DNA enzymes or catalytic DNA

Further information:Deoxyribozyme

Deoxyribozymes, also called DNAzymes or catalytic DNA, were first discovered in 1994.[173] They are mostly single stranded DNA sequences isolated from a large pool of random DNA sequences through a combinatorial approach calledin vitro selection orsystematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment (SELEX). DNAzymes catalyze variety of chemical reactions including RNA-DNA cleavage, RNA-DNA ligation, amino acids phosphorylation-dephosphorylation, carbon-carbon bond formation, etc. DNAzymes can enhance catalytic rate of chemical reactions up to 100,000,000,000-fold over the uncatalyzed reaction.[174] The most extensively studied class of DNAzymes is RNA-cleaving types which have been used to detect different metal ions and designing therapeutic agents. Several metal-specific DNAzymes have been reported including the GR-5 DNAzyme (lead-specific),[173] the CA1-3 DNAzymes (copper-specific),[175] the 39E DNAzyme (uranyl-specific) and the NaA43 DNAzyme (sodium-specific).[176] The NaA43 DNAzyme, which is reported to be more than 10,000-fold selective for sodium over other metal ions, was used to make a real-time sodium sensor in cells.

Bioinformatics

Further information:Bioinformatics

Bioinformatics involves the development of techniques to store,data mine, search and manipulate biological data, including DNAnucleic acid sequence data. These have led to widely applied advances incomputer science, especiallystring searching algorithms,machine learning, anddatabase theory.[177] String searching or matching algorithms, which find an occurrence of a sequence of letters inside a larger sequence of letters, were developed to search for specific sequences of nucleotides.[178] The DNA sequence may bealigned with other DNA sequences to identifyhomologous sequences and locate the specificmutations that make them distinct. These techniques, especiallymultiple sequence alignment, are used in studyingphylogenetic relationships and protein function.[179] Data sets representing entire genomes' worth of DNA sequences, such as those produced by theHuman Genome Project, are difficult to use without the annotations that identify the locations of genes and regulatory elements on each chromosome. Regions of DNA sequence that have the characteristic patterns associated with protein- or RNA-coding genes can be identified bygene finding algorithms, which allow researchers to predict the presence of particulargene products and their possible functions in an organism even before they have been isolated experimentally.[180] Entire genomes may also be compared, which can shed light on the evolutionary history of particular organism and permit the examination of complex evolutionary events.

DNA nanotechnology

Further information:DNA nanotechnology
The DNA structure at left (schematic shown) will self-assemble into the structure visualized byatomic force microscopy at right.DNA nanotechnology is the field that seeks to design nanoscale structures using themolecular recognition properties of DNA molecules.[181]

DNA nanotechnology uses the uniquemolecular recognition properties of DNA and other nucleic acids to create self-assembling branched DNA complexes with useful properties.[182] DNA is thus used as a structural material rather than as a carrier of biological information. This has led to the creation of two-dimensional periodic lattices (both tile-based and using theDNA origami method) and three-dimensional structures in the shapes ofpolyhedra.[183]Nanomechanical devices andalgorithmic self-assembly have also been demonstrated,[184] and these DNA structures have been used to template the arrangement of other molecules such asgold nanoparticles andstreptavidin proteins.[185] DNA and other nucleic acids are the basis ofaptamers, synthetic oligonucleotide ligands for specific target molecules used in a range of biotechnology and biomedical applications.[186]

History and anthropology

Further information:Phylogenetics andGenetic genealogy

Because DNA collects mutations over time, which are then inherited, it contains historical information, and, by comparing DNA sequences, geneticists can infer the evolutionary history of organisms, theirphylogeny.[187] This field of phylogenetics is a powerful tool inevolutionary biology. If DNA sequences within a species are compared,population geneticists can learn the history of particular populations. This can be used in studies ranging fromecological genetics toanthropology.

Information storage

Main article:DNA digital data storage

DNA as astorage device for information has enormous potential since it has much higherstorage density compared to electronic devices. However, high costs, slow read and write times (memory latency), and insufficientreliability has prevented its practical use.[188][189]

History

Further information:History of molecular biology
Maclyn McCarty (left) shakes hands withFrancis Crick andJames Watson, co-originators of the double-helix model based on the X-ray diffraction data and insights ofRosalind Franklin andRaymond Gosling.

DNA was first isolated by the Swiss physicianFriedrich Miescher who, in 1869, discovered a microscopic substance in thepus of discarded surgical bandages. As it resided in the nuclei of cells, he called it "nuclein".[190][191] In 1878,Albrecht Kossel isolated the non-protein component of "nuclein", nucleic acid, and later isolated its five primarynucleobases.[192][193]

In 1909,Phoebus Levene identified the base, sugar, and phosphate nucleotide unit of RNA (then named "yeast nucleic acid").[194][195][196] In 1929, Levene identified deoxyribose sugar in "thymus nucleic acid" (DNA).[197] Levene suggested that DNA consisted of a string of four nucleotide units linked together through the phosphate groups ("tetranucleotide hypothesis"). Levene thought the chain was short and the bases repeated in a fixed order. In 1927,Nikolai Koltsov proposed that inherited traits would be inherited via a "giant hereditary molecule" made up of "two mirror strands that would replicate in a semi-conservative fashion using each strand as a template".[198][199] In 1928,Frederick Griffith in hisexperiment discovered thattraits of the "smooth" form ofPneumococcus could be transferred to the "rough" form of the same bacteria by mixing killed "smooth" bacteria with the live "rough" form.[200][201] This system provided the first clear suggestion that DNA carries genetic information.

In 1933, while studying virginsea urchin eggs,Jean Brachet suggested that DNA is found in thecell nucleus and thatRNA is present exclusively in thecytoplasm. At the time, "yeast nucleic acid" (RNA) was thought to occur only in plants, while "thymus nucleic acid" (DNA) only in animals. The latter was thought to be a tetramer, with the function of buffering cellular pH.[202][203] In 1937,William Astbury produced the first X-ray diffraction patterns that showed that DNA had a regular structure.[204]

In 1943,Oswald Avery, along with co-workersColin MacLeod andMaclyn McCarty, identified DNA as thetransforming principle, supporting Griffith's suggestion (Avery–MacLeod–McCarty experiment).[205]Erwin Chargaff developed and published observations now known asChargaff's rules, stating that in DNA from any species of any organism, the amount ofguanine should be equal tocytosine and the amount ofadenine should be equal tothymine.[206][207]

Ablue plaque outsideThe Eaglepub in Cambridge, England commemorating Crick and Watson

By 1951,Alec Todd and collaborators at theUniversity of Cambridge had determined by biochemical methods how the backbone of DNA is structured via the successive linking of carbon atoms 3 and 5 of the sugar to phosphates. This would help to corroborate Watson and Crick's later X-ray structural work.[208] Todd would later be awarded the 1957Nobel Prize in Chemistry for this and other discoveries related to DNA.[209]

Late in 1951,Francis Crick started working withJames Watson at theCavendish Laboratory within the University of Cambridge. DNA's role inheredity was confirmed in 1952 whenAlfred Hershey andMartha Chase in theHershey–Chase experiment showed that DNA is thegenetic material of theenterobacteria phage T2.[210]

Photo 51, showing X-ray diffraction pattern of DNA

In May 1952,Raymond Gosling, a graduate student working under the supervision ofRosalind Franklin, took anX-ray diffraction image, labeled as "Photo 51",[211] at high hydration levels of DNA. This photo was given to Watson and Crick byMaurice Wilkins and was critical to their obtaining the correct structure of DNA. Franklin told Crick and Watson that the backbones had to be on the outside. Before then, Linus Pauling, and Watson and Crick, had erroneous models with the chains inside and the bases pointing outwards. Franklin's identification of thespace group for DNA crystals proved her correct.[212] In February 1953,Linus Pauling andRobert Corey proposed a model for nucleic acids containing three intertwined chains, with the phosphates near the axis, and the bases on the outside.[213] Watson and Crick completed their model, which is now accepted as the first correct model of the double helix ofDNA. On 28 February 1953 Crick interrupted patrons' lunchtime atThe Eaglepub in Cambridge, England to announce that he and Watson had "discovered the secret of life".[214]

Pencil sketch of the DNA double helix by Francis Crick in 1953

The 25 April 1953 issue of the journalNature published a series of five articles giving the Watson and Crick double-helix structure DNA and evidence supporting it.[215] The structure was reported in a letter titled "MOLECULAR STRUCTURE OF NUCLEIC ACIDS A Structure for Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid", in which they said, "It has not escaped our notice that the specific pairing we have postulated immediately suggests a possible copying mechanism for the genetic material."[9] This letter was followed by a letter from Franklin and Gosling, which was the first publication of their own X-ray diffraction data and of their original analysis method.[48][216] Then followed a letter by Wilkins and two of his colleagues, which contained an analysis ofin vivo B-DNA X-ray patterns, and which supported the presencein vivo of the Watson and Crick structure.[49]

In April 2023, scientists, based on new evidence, concluded that Rosalind Franklin was a contributor and "equal player" in the discovery process of DNA, rather than otherwise, as may have been presented subsequently after the time of the discovery.[217][218][219] In 1962, after Franklin's death, Watson, Crick, and Wilkins jointly received theNobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine.[220] Nobel Prizes are awarded only to living recipients. A debate continues about who should receive credit for the discovery.[221]

In an influential presentation in 1957, Crick laid out thecentral dogma of molecular biology, which foretold the relationship between DNA, RNA, and proteins, and articulated the "adaptor hypothesis".[222] Final confirmation of the replication mechanism that was implied by the double-helical structure followed in 1958 through theMeselson–Stahl experiment.[223] Further work by Crick and co-workers showed that the genetic code was based on non-overlapping triplets of bases, calledcodons, allowingHar Gobind Khorana,Robert W. Holley, andMarshall Warren Nirenberg to decipher the genetic code.[224] These findings represent the birth ofmolecular biology.[225]

In 1986, DNA analysis was first used in a criminal investigation when police in the UK requestedAlec Jeffreys of the University of Leicester to prove or disprove the involvement in a particular case of a suspect who claimed innocence in the matter. Although the suspect had already confessed to committing a recent rape-murder, he was denying any involvement in a similar crime committed three years earlier. Yet the details of the two cases were so alike that the police concluded both crimes had been committed by the same person. However, all charges against the suspect were dropped when Jeffreys' DNA testing exonerated the suspect — from both the earlier murder and the one to which he'd confessed. Further such DNA profiling led to positive identification of another suspect (Colin Pitchfork) who, in 1988, was found guilty of both rape-murders.[226][227]

See also

References

  1. ^"deoxyribonucleic acid".Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary. Merriam-Webster.:/dˈɒksɪˌrbnjˌklɪk,-ˌkl-/
  2. ^Alberts B, Johnson A, Lewis J, Raff M, Roberts K, Walter P (2014).Molecular Biology of the Cell (6th ed.). Garland. p. Chapter 4: DNA, Chromosomes and Genomes.ISBN 978-0-8153-4432-2.Archived from the original on 14 July 2014.
  3. ^Purcell A."DNA".Basic Biology.Archived from the original on 5 January 2017.
  4. ^"Uracil".Genome.gov. Retrieved21 November 2019.
  5. ^Russell P (2001).iGenetics. New York: Benjamin Cummings.ISBN 0-8053-4553-1.
  6. ^Saenger W (1984).Principles of Nucleic Acid Structure. New York: Springer-Verlag.ISBN 0-387-90762-9.
  7. ^abAlberts B, Johnson A, Lewis J, Raff M, Roberts K, Peter W (2002).Molecular Biology of the Cell (Fourth ed.). New York and London: Garland Science.ISBN 0-8153-3218-1.OCLC 145080076.Archived from the original on 1 November 2016.
  8. ^Irobalieva RN, Fogg JM, Catanese DJ, Catanese DJ, Sutthibutpong T, Chen M, et al. (October 2015)."Structural diversity of supercoiled DNA".Nature Communications.6 (1) 8440.Bibcode:2015NatCo...6.8440I.doi:10.1038/ncomms9440.ISSN 2041-1723.PMC 4608029.PMID 26455586.
  9. ^abcdWatson JD, Crick FH (April 1953)."Molecular structure of nucleic acids; a structure for deoxyribose nucleic acid"(PDF).Nature.171 (4356):737–38.Bibcode:1953Natur.171..737W.doi:10.1038/171737a0.ISSN 0028-0836.PMID 13054692.S2CID 4253007.Archived(PDF) from the original on 4 February 2007.
  10. ^Mandelkern M, Elias JG, Eden D, Crothers DM (October 1981). "The dimensions of DNA in solution".Journal of Molecular Biology.152 (1):153–61.doi:10.1016/0022-2836(81)90099-1.ISSN 0022-2836.PMID 7338906.
  11. ^Arrighi FE, Mandel M, Bergendahl J, Hsu TC (June 1970). "Buoyant densities of DNA of mammals".Biochemical Genetics.4 (3):367–376.doi:10.1007/BF00485753.ISSN 0006-2928.PMID 4991030.S2CID 27950750.
  12. ^abcdBerg J, Tymoczko J, Stryer L (2002).Biochemistry. W.H. Freeman and Company.ISBN 0-7167-4955-6.
  13. ^IUPAC-IUB Commission on Biochemical Nomenclature (CBN) (December 1970)."Abbreviations and Symbols for Nucleic Acids, Polynucleotides and their Constituents. Recommendations 1970".The Biochemical Journal.120 (3):449–54.doi:10.1042/bj1200449.ISSN 0306-3283.PMC 1179624.PMID 5499957. Archived fromthe original on 5 February 2007.
  14. ^abGhosh A, Bansal M (April 2003). "A glossary of DNA structures from A to Z".Acta Crystallographica Section D.59 (Pt 4):620–26.Bibcode:2003AcCrD..59..620G.doi:10.1107/S0907444903003251.ISSN 0907-4449.PMID 12657780.
  15. ^Edwards KJ, Brown DG, Spink N, Skelly JV, Neidle S."RCSB PDB – 1D65: Molecular structure of the B-DNA dodecamer d(CGCAAATTTGCG)2. An examination of propeller twist and minor-groove water structure at 2.2 A resolution".www.rcsb.org. Retrieved27 March 2023.
  16. ^Yakovchuk P, Protozanova E, Frank-Kamenetskii MD (2006)."Base-stacking and base-pairing contributions into thermal stability of the DNA double helix".Nucleic Acids Research.34 (2):564–74.doi:10.1093/nar/gkj454.ISSN 0305-1048.PMC 1360284.PMID 16449200.
  17. ^Tropp BE (2012).Molecular Biology (4th ed.). Sudbury, Mass.: Jones and Barlett Learning.ISBN 978-0-7637-8663-2.
  18. ^Carr S (1953)."Watson-Crick Structure of DNA". Memorial University of Newfoundland.Archived from the original on 19 July 2016. Retrieved13 July 2016.
  19. ^Verma S, Eckstein F (1998)."Modified oligonucleotides: synthesis and strategy for users".Annual Review of Biochemistry.67:99–134.doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.67.1.99.ISSN 0066-4154.PMID 9759484.
  20. ^Johnson TB, Coghill RD (1925). "Pyrimidines. CIII. The discovery of 5-methylcytosine in tuberculinic acid, the nucleic acid of the tubercle bacillus".Journal of the American Chemical Society.47:2838–44.doi:10.1021/ja01688a030.ISSN 0002-7863.
  21. ^Weigele P, Raleigh EA (October 2016)."Biosynthesis and Function of Modified Bases in Bacteria and Their Viruses".Chemical Reviews.116 (20):12655–12687.doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00114.ISSN 0009-2665.PMID 27319741.
  22. ^Kumar S, Chinnusamy V, Mohapatra T (2018)."Epigenetics of Modified DNA Bases: 5-Methylcytosine and Beyond".Frontiers in Genetics.9 640.doi:10.3389/fgene.2018.00640.ISSN 1664-8021.PMC 6305559.PMID 30619465.
  23. ^Carell T, Kurz MQ, Müller M, Rossa M, Spada F (April 2018). "Non-canonical Bases in the Genome: The Regulatory Information Layer in DNA".Angewandte Chemie.57 (16):4296–4312.Bibcode:2018ACIE...57.4296C.doi:10.1002/anie.201708228.PMID 28941008.
  24. ^Wing R, Drew H, Takano T, Broka C, Tanaka S, Itakura K, et al. (October 1980). "Crystal structure analysis of a complete turn of B-DNA".Nature.287 (5784):755–58.Bibcode:1980Natur.287..755W.doi:10.1038/287755a0.PMID 7432492.S2CID 4315465.
  25. ^abPabo CO, Sauer RT (1984). "Protein-DNA recognition".Annual Review of Biochemistry.53:293–321.doi:10.1146/annurev.bi.53.070184.001453.PMID 6236744.
  26. ^Nikolova EN, Zhou H, Gottardo FL, Alvey HS, Kimsey IJ, Al-Hashimi HM (2013)."A historical account of Hoogsteen base-pairs in duplex DNA".Biopolymers.99 (12):955–68.doi:10.1002/bip.22334.PMC 3844552.PMID 23818176.
  27. ^Clausen-Schaumann H, Rief M, Tolksdorf C, Gaub HE (April 2000)."Mechanical stability of single DNA molecules".Biophysical Journal.78 (4):1997–2007.Bibcode:2000BpJ....78.1997C.doi:10.1016/S0006-3495(00)76747-6.PMC 1300792.PMID 10733978.
  28. ^Chalikian TV, Völker J, Plum GE, Breslauer KJ (July 1999)."A more unified picture for the thermodynamics of nucleic acid duplex melting: a characterization by calorimetric and volumetric techniques".Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.96 (14):7853–58.Bibcode:1999PNAS...96.7853C.doi:10.1073/pnas.96.14.7853.PMC 22151.PMID 10393911.
  29. ^deHaseth PL, Helmann JD (June 1995). "Open complex formation by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase: the mechanism of polymerase-induced strand separation of double helical DNA".Molecular Microbiology.16 (5):817–24.doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.1995.tb02309.x.PMID 7476180.S2CID 24479358.
  30. ^Isaksson J, Acharya S, Barman J, Cheruku P, Chattopadhyaya J (December 2004)."Single-stranded adenine-rich DNA and RNA retain structural characteristics of their respective double-stranded conformations and show directional differences in stacking pattern"(PDF).Biochemistry.43 (51):15996–6010.doi:10.1021/bi048221v.PMID 15609994.Archived(PDF) from the original on 10 June 2007.
  31. ^abPiovesan A, Pelleri MC, Antonaros F, Strippoli P, Caracausi M, Vitale L (2019)."On the length, weight and GC content of the human genome".BMC Res Notes.12 (1) 106.doi:10.1186/s13104-019-4137-z.PMC 6391780.PMID 30813969.
  32. ^Gregory SG, Barlow KF, McLay KE, Kaul R, Swarbreck D, Dunham A, et al. (May 2006)."The DNA sequence and biological annotation of human chromosome 1".Nature.441 (7091):315–21.Bibcode:2006Natur.441..315G.doi:10.1038/nature04727.PMID 16710414.
  33. ^Anderson S, Bankier AT, Barrell BG, de Bruijn MH, Coulson AR, Drouin J, et al. (April 1981). "Sequence and organization of the human mitochondrial genome".Nature.290 (5806):457–465.Bibcode:1981Natur.290..457A.doi:10.1038/290457a0.PMID 7219534.S2CID 4355527.
  34. ^"Untitled". Archived fromthe original on 13 August 2011. Retrieved13 June 2012.
  35. ^abcSatoh M, Kuroiwa T (September 1991). "Organization of multiple nucleoids and DNA molecules in mitochondria of a human cell".Experimental Cell Research.196 (1):137–140.doi:10.1016/0014-4827(91)90467-9.PMID 1715276.
  36. ^Zhang D, Keilty D, Zhang ZF, Chian RC (March 2017)."Mitochondria in oocyte aging: current understanding".Facts, Views & Vision in ObGyn.9 (1):29–38.PMC 5506767.PMID 28721182.
  37. ^Designation of the two strands of DNAArchived 24 April 2008 at theWayback Machine JCBN/NC-IUB Newsletter 1989. Retrieved 7 May 2008
  38. ^Hüttenhofer A, Schattner P, Polacek N (May 2005). "Non-coding RNAs: hope or hype?".Trends in Genetics.21 (5):289–97.doi:10.1016/j.tig.2005.03.007.PMID 15851066.
  39. ^Munroe SH (November 2004). "Diversity of antisense regulation in eukaryotes: multiple mechanisms, emerging patterns".Journal of Cellular Biochemistry.93 (4):664–71.doi:10.1002/jcb.20252.PMID 15389973.S2CID 23748148.
  40. ^Makalowska I, Lin CF, Makalowski W (February 2005). "Overlapping genes in vertebrate genomes".Computational Biology and Chemistry.29 (1):1–12.doi:10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2004.12.006.PMID 15680581.
  41. ^Johnson ZI, Chisholm SW (November 2004)."Properties of overlapping genes are conserved across microbial genomes".Genome Research.14 (11):2268–72.doi:10.1101/gr.2433104.PMC 525685.PMID 15520290.
  42. ^Lamb RA, Horvath CM (August 1991)."Diversity of coding strategies in influenza viruses".Trends in Genetics.7 (8):261–66.doi:10.1016/0168-9525(91)90326-L.PMC 7173306.PMID 1771674.
  43. ^Benham CJ, Mielke SP (2005)."DNA mechanics"(PDF).Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering.7:21–53.doi:10.1146/annurev.bioeng.6.062403.132016.PMID 16004565.S2CID 1427671. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 1 March 2019.
  44. ^abChampoux JJ (2001). "DNA topoisomerases: structure, function, and mechanism".Annual Review of Biochemistry.70:369–413.doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.70.1.369.PMID 11395412.S2CID 18144189.
  45. ^abWang JC (June 2002). "Cellular roles of DNA topoisomerases: a molecular perspective".Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.3 (6):430–40.doi:10.1038/nrm831.PMID 12042765.S2CID 205496065.
  46. ^Basu HS, Feuerstein BG, Zarling DA, Shafer RH, Marton LJ (October 1988). "Recognition of Z-RNA and Z-DNA determinants by polyamines in solution: experimental and theoretical studies".Journal of Biomolecular Structure & Dynamics.6 (2):299–309.doi:10.1080/07391102.1988.10507714.PMID 2482766.
  47. ^
  48. ^abFranklin RE, Gosling RG (April 1953)."Molecular configuration in sodium thymonucleate"(PDF).Nature.171 (4356):740–41.Bibcode:1953Natur.171..740F.doi:10.1038/171740a0.PMID 13054694.S2CID 4268222.Archived(PDF) from the original on 3 January 2011.
  49. ^abWilkins MH, Stokes AR, Wilson HR (April 1953)."Molecular structure of deoxypentose nucleic acids"(PDF).Nature.171 (4356):738–40.Bibcode:1953Natur.171..738W.doi:10.1038/171738a0.PMID 13054693.S2CID 4280080.Archived(PDF) from the original on 13 May 2011.
  50. ^Leslie AG, Arnott S, Chandrasekaran R, Ratliff RL (October 1980). "Polymorphism of DNA double helices".Journal of Molecular Biology.143 (1):49–72.doi:10.1016/0022-2836(80)90124-2.PMID 7441761.
  51. ^Baianu IC (1980)."Structural Order and Partial Disorder in Biological systems".Bull. Math. Biol.42 (4):137–41.doi:10.1007/BF02462372.S2CID 189888972.
  52. ^Hosemann R, Bagchi RN (1962).Direct analysis of diffraction by matter. Amsterdam – New York: North-Holland Publishers.
  53. ^Baianu IC (1978)."X-ray scattering by partially disordered membrane systems"(PDF).Acta Crystallogr A.34 (5):751–53.Bibcode:1978AcCrA..34..751B.doi:10.1107/S0567739478001540. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 14 March 2020. Retrieved29 August 2019.
  54. ^Wahl MC, Sundaralingam M (1997). "Crystal structures of A-DNA duplexes".Biopolymers.44 (1):45–63.doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0282(1997)44:1<45::AID-BIP4>3.0.CO;2-#.PMID 9097733.
  55. ^Lu XJ, Shakked Z, Olson WK (July 2000). "A-form conformational motifs in ligand-bound DNA structures".Journal of Molecular Biology.300 (4):819–40.doi:10.1006/jmbi.2000.3690.PMID 10891271.
  56. ^Rothenburg S, Koch-Nolte F, Haag F (December 2001). "DNA methylation and Z-DNA formation as mediators of quantitative differences in the expression of alleles".Immunological Reviews.184:286–98.doi:10.1034/j.1600-065x.2001.1840125.x.PMID 12086319.S2CID 20589136.
  57. ^Oh DB, Kim YG, Rich A (December 2002)."Z-DNA-binding proteins can act as potent effectors of gene expression in vivo".Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.99 (26):16666–71.Bibcode:2002PNAS...9916666O.doi:10.1073/pnas.262672699.PMC 139201.PMID 12486233.
  58. ^Palmer J (2 December 2010)."Arsenic-loving bacteria may help in hunt for alien life".BBC News.Archived from the original on 3 December 2010. Retrieved2 December 2010.
  59. ^abBortman H (2 December 2010)."Arsenic-Eating Bacteria Opens New Possibilities for Alien Life".Space.com.Archived from the original on 4 December 2010. Retrieved2 December 2010.
  60. ^Katsnelson A (2 December 2010)."Arsenic-eating microbe may redefine chemistry of life".Nature News.doi:10.1038/news.2010.645.Archived from the original on 12 February 2012.
  61. ^Cressey D (3 October 2012). "'Arsenic-life' Bacterium Prefers Phosphorus after all".Nature News.doi:10.1038/nature.2012.11520.S2CID 87341731.
  62. ^"Structure and packing of human telomeric DNA".ndbserver.rutgers.edu. Retrieved18 May 2023.
  63. ^abGreider CW, Blackburn EH (December 1985)."Identification of a specific telomere terminal transferase activity in Tetrahymena extracts".Cell.43 (2 Pt 1):405–13.doi:10.1016/0092-8674(85)90170-9.PMID 3907856.
  64. ^abcNugent CI, Lundblad V (April 1998)."The telomerase reverse transcriptase: components and regulation".Genes & Development.12 (8):1073–85.doi:10.1101/gad.12.8.1073.PMID 9553037.
  65. ^Wright WE, Tesmer VM, Huffman KE, Levene SD, Shay JW (November 1997)."Normal human chromosomes have long G-rich telomeric overhangs at one end".Genes & Development.11 (21):2801–09.doi:10.1101/gad.11.21.2801.PMC 316649.PMID 9353250.
  66. ^abBurge S, Parkinson GN, Hazel P, Todd AK, Neidle S (2006)."Quadruplex DNA: sequence, topology and structure".Nucleic Acids Research.34 (19):5402–15.doi:10.1093/nar/gkl655.PMC 1636468.PMID 17012276.
  67. ^Parkinson GN, Lee MP, Neidle S (June 2002). "Crystal structure of parallel quadruplexes from human telomeric DNA".Nature.417 (6891):876–80.Bibcode:2002Natur.417..876P.doi:10.1038/nature755.PMID 12050675.S2CID 4422211.
  68. ^Griffith JD, Comeau L, Rosenfield S, Stansel RM, Bianchi A, Moss H, et al. (May 1999). "Mammalian telomeres end in a large duplex loop".Cell.97 (4):503–14.CiteSeerX 10.1.1.335.2649.doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80760-6.PMID 10338214.S2CID 721901.
  69. ^Seeman NC (November 2005)."DNA enables nanoscale control of the structure of matter".Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics.38 (4):363–71.doi:10.1017/S0033583505004087.PMC 3478329.PMID 16515737.
  70. ^Warren M (21 February 2019)."Four new DNA letters double life's alphabet".Nature.566 (7745): 436.Bibcode:2019Natur.566..436W.doi:10.1038/d41586-019-00650-8.PMID 30809059.
  71. ^Hoshika S, Leal NA, Kim MJ, Kim MS, Karalkar NB, Kim HJ, et al. (22 February 2019)."Hachimoji DNA and RNA: A genetic system with eight building blocks (paywall)".Science.363 (6429):884–887.Bibcode:2019Sci...363..884H.doi:10.1126/science.aat0971.PMC 6413494.PMID 30792304.
  72. ^Burghardt B, Hartmann AK (February 2007)."RNA secondary structure design".Physical Review E.75 (2) 021920.arXiv:physics/0609135.Bibcode:2007PhRvE..75b1920B.doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.75.021920.PMID 17358380.S2CID 17574854.
  73. ^Reusch W."Nucleic Acids". Michigan State University. Retrieved30 June 2022.
  74. ^"How To Extract DNA From Anything Living". University of Utah. Retrieved30 June 2022.
  75. ^Hu Q, Rosenfeld MG (2012)."Epigenetic regulation of human embryonic stem cells".Frontiers in Genetics.3: 238.doi:10.3389/fgene.2012.00238.PMC 3488762.PMID 23133442.
  76. ^Klose RJ, Bird AP (February 2006). "Genomic DNA methylation: the mark and its mediators".Trends in Biochemical Sciences.31 (2):89–97.doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2005.12.008.PMID 16403636.
  77. ^Bird A (January 2002)."DNA methylation patterns and epigenetic memory".Genes & Development.16 (1):6–21.doi:10.1101/gad.947102.PMID 11782440.
  78. ^Walsh CP, Xu GL (2006). "Cytosine methylation and DNA repair".DNA Methylation: Basic Mechanisms. Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology. Vol. 301. pp. 283–315.doi:10.1007/3-540-31390-7_11.ISBN 3-540-29114-8.PMID 16570853.
  79. ^Kriaucionis S, Heintz N (May 2009)."The nuclear DNA base 5-hydroxymethylcytosine is present in Purkinje neurons and the brain".Science.324 (5929):929–30.Bibcode:2009Sci...324..929K.doi:10.1126/science.1169786.PMC 3263819.PMID 19372393.
  80. ^Ratel D, Ravanat JL, Berger F, Wion D (March 2006)."N6-methyladenine: the other methylated base of DNA".BioEssays.28 (3):309–15.doi:10.1002/bies.20342.PMC 2754416.PMID 16479578.
  81. ^Gommers-Ampt JH, Van Leeuwen F, de Beer AL, Vliegenthart JF, Dizdaroglu M, Kowalak JA, et al. (December 1993). "beta-D-glucosyl-hydroxymethyluracil: a novel modified base present in the DNA of the parasitic protozoan T. brucei".Cell.75 (6):1129–36.doi:10.1016/0092-8674(93)90322-H.hdl:1874/5219.PMID 8261512.S2CID 24801094.
  82. ^Created fromPDB 1JDGArchived 22 September 2008 at theWayback Machine
  83. ^Douki T, Reynaud-Angelin A, Cadet J, Sage E (August 2003). "Bipyrimidine photoproducts rather than oxidative lesions are the main type of DNA damage involved in the genotoxic effect of solar UVA radiation".Biochemistry.42 (30):9221–26.doi:10.1021/bi034593c.PMID 12885257.
  84. ^Cadet J, Delatour T, Douki T, Gasparutto D, Pouget JP, Ravanat JL, et al. (March 1999). "Hydroxyl radicals and DNA base damage".Mutation Research.424 (1–2):9–21.Bibcode:1999MRFMM.424....9C.doi:10.1016/S0027-5107(99)00004-4.PMID 10064846.
  85. ^Beckman KB, Ames BN (August 1997)."Oxidative decay of DNA".The Journal of Biological Chemistry.272 (32):19633–36.doi:10.1074/jbc.272.32.19633.PMID 9289489.
  86. ^Valerie K, Povirk LF (September 2003)."Regulation and mechanisms of mammalian double-strand break repair".Oncogene.22 (37):5792–812.doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1206679.PMID 12947387.
  87. ^Johnson G (28 December 2010)."Unearthing Prehistoric Tumors, and Debate".The New York Times.Archived from the original on 24 June 2017.If we lived long enough, sooner or later we all would get cancer.
  88. ^Alberts B, Johnson A, Lewis J, et al. (2002)."The Preventable Causes of Cancer".Molecular biology of the cell (4th ed.). New York: Garland Science.ISBN 0-8153-4072-9.Archived from the original on 2 January 2016.A certain irreducible background incidence of cancer is to be expected regardless of circumstances: mutations can never be absolutely avoided, because they are an inescapable consequence of fundamental limitations on the accuracy of DNA replication, as discussed in Chapter 5. If a human could live long enough, it is inevitable that at least one of his or her cells would eventually accumulate a set of mutations sufficient for cancer to develop.
  89. ^Bernstein H, Payne CM, Bernstein C, Garewal H, Dvorak K (2008)."Cancer and aging as consequences of un-repaired DNA damage". In Kimura H, Suzuki A (eds.).New Research on DNA Damage. New York: Nova Science Publishers. pp. 1–47.ISBN 978-1-60456-581-2.Archived from the original on 25 October 2014.
  90. ^Hoeijmakers JH (October 2009). "DNA damage, aging, and cancer".The New England Journal of Medicine.361 (15):1475–85.doi:10.1056/NEJMra0804615.hdl:1765/17811.PMID 19812404.
  91. ^Freitas AA, de Magalhães JP (2011). "A review and appraisal of the DNA damage theory of ageing".Mutation Research.728 (1–2):12–22.Bibcode:2011MRRMR.728...12F.doi:10.1016/j.mrrev.2011.05.001.PMID 21600302.
  92. ^Ferguson LR, Denny WA (September 1991). "The genetic toxicology of acridines".Mutation Research.258 (2):123–60.doi:10.1016/0165-1110(91)90006-H.PMID 1881402.
  93. ^Stephens TD, Bunde CJ, Fillmore BJ (June 2000). "Mechanism of action in thalidomide teratogenesis".Biochemical Pharmacology.59 (12):1489–99.doi:10.1016/S0006-2952(99)00388-3.PMID 10799645.
  94. ^Jeffrey AM (1985). "DNA modification by chemical carcinogens".Pharmacology & Therapeutics.28 (2):237–72.doi:10.1016/0163-7258(85)90013-0.PMID 3936066.
  95. ^Braña MF, Cacho M, Gradillas A, de Pascual-Teresa B, Ramos A (November 2001). "Intercalators as anticancer drugs".Current Pharmaceutical Design.7 (17):1745–80.doi:10.2174/1381612013397113.PMID 11562309.
  96. ^Venter JC, Adams MD, Myers EW, Li PW, Mural RJ, Sutton GG, et al. (February 2001)."The sequence of the human genome".Science.291 (5507):1304–51.Bibcode:2001Sci...291.1304V.doi:10.1126/science.1058040.PMID 11181995.
  97. ^Thanbichler M, Wang SC, Shapiro L (October 2005)."The bacterial nucleoid: a highly organized and dynamic structure".Journal of Cellular Biochemistry.96 (3):506–21.doi:10.1002/jcb.20519.PMID 15988757.
  98. ^Wolfsberg TG, McEntyre J, Schuler GD (February 2001)."Guide to the draft human genome".Nature.409 (6822):824–26.Bibcode:2001Natur.409..824W.doi:10.1038/35057000.PMID 11236998.
  99. ^Gregory TR (January 2005)."The C-value enigma in plants and animals: a review of parallels and an appeal for partnership".Annals of Botany.95 (1):133–46.doi:10.1093/aob/mci009.PMC 4246714.PMID 15596463.
  100. ^Birney E,Stamatoyannopoulos JA, Dutta A, Guigó R, Gingeras TR, Margulies EH, et al. (June 2007)."Identification and analysis of functional elements in 1% of the human genome by the ENCODE pilot project".Nature.447 (7146):799–816.Bibcode:2007Natur.447..799B.doi:10.1038/nature05874.PMC 2212820.PMID 17571346.
  101. ^Yin YW, Steitz TA."RCSB PDB – 1MSW: Structural basis for the transition from initiation to elongation transcription in T7 RNA polymerase".www.rcsb.org. Retrieved27 March 2023.
  102. ^Pidoux AL, Allshire RC (March 2005)."The role of heterochromatin in centromere function".Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences.360 (1455):569–79.doi:10.1098/rstb.2004.1611.PMC 1569473.PMID 15905142.
  103. ^Harrison PM, Hegyi H, Balasubramanian S, Luscombe NM, Bertone P, Echols N, et al. (February 2002)."Molecular fossils in the human genome: identification and analysis of the pseudogenes in chromosomes 21 and 22".Genome Research.12 (2):272–80.doi:10.1101/gr.207102.PMC 155275.PMID 11827946.
  104. ^Harrison PM, Gerstein M (May 2002). "Studying genomes through the aeons: protein families, pseudogenes and proteome evolution".Journal of Molecular Biology.318 (5):1155–74.doi:10.1016/S0022-2836(02)00109-2.PMID 12083509.
  105. ^Albà M (2001)."Replicative DNA polymerases".Genome Biology.2 (1) REVIEWS3002.doi:10.1186/gb-2001-2-1-reviews3002.PMC 150442.PMID 11178285.
  106. ^Tani K, Nasu M (2010). "Roles of Extracellular DNA in Bacterial Ecosystems". In Kikuchi Y, Rykova EY (eds.).Extracellular Nucleic Acids. Springer. pp. 25–38.ISBN 978-3-642-12616-1.
  107. ^Vlassov VV, Laktionov PP, Rykova EY (July 2007). "Extracellular nucleic acids".BioEssays.29 (7):654–67.doi:10.1002/bies.20604.PMID 17563084.S2CID 32463239.
  108. ^Finkel SE, Kolter R (November 2001)."DNA as a nutrient: novel role for bacterial competence gene homologs".Journal of Bacteriology.183 (21):6288–93.doi:10.1128/JB.183.21.6288-6293.2001.PMC 100116.PMID 11591672.
  109. ^Mulcahy H, Charron-Mazenod L, Lewenza S (November 2008)."Extracellular DNA chelates cations and induces antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms".PLOS Pathogens.4 (11) e1000213.doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1000213.PMC 2581603.PMID 19023416.
  110. ^Berne C, Kysela DT, Brun YV (August 2010)."A bacterial extracellular DNA inhibits settling of motile progeny cells within a biofilm".Molecular Microbiology.77 (4):815–29.doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07267.x.PMC 2962764.PMID 20598083.
  111. ^Whitchurch CB, Tolker-Nielsen T, Ragas PC, Mattick JS (February 2002). "Extracellular DNA required for bacterial biofilm formation".Science.295 (5559): 1487.doi:10.1126/science.295.5559.1487.PMID 11859186.
  112. ^Hu W, Li L, Sharma S, Wang J, McHardy I, Lux R, et al. (2012)."DNA builds and strengthens the extracellular matrix in Myxococcus xanthus biofilms by interacting with exopolysaccharides".PLOS ONE.7 (12) e51905.Bibcode:2012PLoSO...751905H.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0051905.PMC 3530553.PMID 23300576.
  113. ^Hui L, Bianchi DW (February 2013)."Recent advances in the prenatal interrogation of the human fetal genome".Trends in Genetics.29 (2):84–91.doi:10.1016/j.tig.2012.10.013.PMC 4378900.PMID 23158400.
  114. ^Foote AD, Thomsen PF, Sveegaard S, Wahlberg M, Kielgast J, Kyhn LA, et al. (2012)."Investigating the potential use of environmental DNA (eDNA) for genetic monitoring of marine mammals".PLOS ONE.7 (8) e41781.Bibcode:2012PLoSO...741781F.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0041781.PMC 3430683.PMID 22952587.
  115. ^"Researchers Detect Land Animals Using DNA in Nearby Water Bodies".
  116. ^Brinkmann V, Reichard U, Goosmann C, Fauler B, Uhlemann Y, Weiss DS, et al. (5 March 2004)."Neutrophil Extracellular Traps Kill Bacteria".Science.303 (5663):1532–1535.Bibcode:2004Sci...303.1532B.doi:10.1126/science.1092385.
  117. ^Fuchs TA, Abed U, Goosmann C, Hurwitz R, Schulze I, Wahn V, et al. (15 January 2007)."Novel cell death program leads to neutrophil extracellular traps".The Journal of Cell Biology.176 (2):231–241.doi:10.1083/jcb.200606027.ISSN 1540-8140.PMC 2063942.PMID 17210947.
  118. ^Thiam HR, Wong SL, Wagner DD, Waterman CM (6 October 2020)."Cellular Mechanisms of NETosis".Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology.36:191–218.doi:10.1146/annurev-cellbio-020520-111016.ISSN 1081-0706.PMC 8499668.PMID 32663035.
  119. ^Sandman K, Pereira SL, Reeve JN (December 1998)."Diversity of prokaryotic chromosomal proteins and the origin of the nucleosome".Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.54 (12):1350–64.doi:10.1007/s000180050259.PMC 11147202.PMID 9893710.S2CID 21101836.
  120. ^Dame RT (May 2005)."The role of nucleoid-associated proteins in the organization and compaction of bacterial chromatin".Molecular Microbiology.56 (4):858–70.doi:10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04598.x.PMID 15853876.S2CID 26965112.
  121. ^Luger K, Mäder AW, Richmond RK, Sargent DF, Richmond TJ (September 1997). "Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 A resolution".Nature.389 (6648):251–60.Bibcode:1997Natur.389..251L.doi:10.1038/38444.PMID 9305837.S2CID 4328827.
  122. ^Jenuwein T, Allis CD (August 2001)."Translating the histone code"(PDF).Science.293 (5532):1074–80.doi:10.1126/science.1063127.PMID 11498575.S2CID 1883924.Archived(PDF) from the original on 8 August 2017.
  123. ^Ito T (2003). "Nucleosome Assembly and Remodeling".Protein Complexes that Modify Chromatin. Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology. Vol. 274. pp. 1–22.doi:10.1007/978-3-642-55747-7_1.ISBN 978-3-540-44208-0.PMID 12596902.
  124. ^Thomas JO (August 2001). "HMG1 and 2: architectural DNA-binding proteins".Biochemical Society Transactions.29 (Pt 4):395–401.doi:10.1042/BST0290395.PMID 11497996.
  125. ^Grosschedl R, Giese K, Pagel J (March 1994). "HMG domain proteins: architectural elements in the assembly of nucleoprotein structures".Trends in Genetics.10 (3):94–100.doi:10.1016/0168-9525(94)90232-1.PMID 8178371.
  126. ^Iftode C, Daniely Y, Borowiec JA (1999). "Replication protein A (RPA): the eukaryotic SSB".Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.34 (3):141–80.doi:10.1080/10409239991209255.PMID 10473346.
  127. ^Beamer LJ, Pabo CO."RCSB PDB – 1LMB: Refined 1.8 Å crystal structure of the lambda repressor-operator complex".www.rcsb.org. Retrieved27 March 2023.
  128. ^Myers LC, Kornberg RD (2000). "Mediator of transcriptional regulation".Annual Review of Biochemistry.69:729–49.doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.69.1.729.PMID 10966474.
  129. ^Spiegelman BM, Heinrich R (October 2004)."Biological control through regulated transcriptional coactivators".Cell.119 (2):157–67.doi:10.1016/j.cell.2004.09.037.PMID 15479634.
  130. ^Li Z, Van Calcar S, Qu C, Cavenee WK, Zhang MQ, Ren B (July 2003)."A global transcriptional regulatory role for c-Myc in Burkitt's lymphoma cells".Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.100 (14):8164–69.Bibcode:2003PNAS..100.8164L.doi:10.1073/pnas.1332764100.PMC 166200.PMID 12808131.
  131. ^Kostrewa D, Winkler FK."RCSB PDB – 1RVA: Mg2+ binding to the active site of EcoRV endonuclease: a crystallographic study of complexes with substrate and product DNA at 2 Å resolution".www.rcsb.org. Retrieved27 March 2023.
  132. ^Bickle TA, Krüger DH (June 1993)."Biology of DNA restriction".Microbiological Reviews.57 (2):434–50.doi:10.1128/MMBR.57.2.434-450.1993.PMC 372918.PMID 8336674.
  133. ^abDoherty AJ, Suh SW (November 2000)."Structural and mechanistic conservation in DNA ligases".Nucleic Acids Research.28 (21):4051–58.doi:10.1093/nar/28.21.4051.PMC 113121.PMID 11058099.
  134. ^Schoeffler AJ, Berger JM (December 2005). "Recent advances in understanding structure-function relationships in the type II topoisomerase mechanism".Biochemical Society Transactions.33 (Pt 6):1465–70.doi:10.1042/BST0331465.PMID 16246147.
  135. ^Tuteja N, Tuteja R (May 2004)."Unraveling DNA helicases. Motif, structure, mechanism and function"(PDF).European Journal of Biochemistry.271 (10):1849–63.doi:10.1111/j.1432-1033.2004.04094.x.PMID 15128295.
  136. ^Joyce CM, Steitz TA (November 1995)."Polymerase structures and function: variations on a theme?".Journal of Bacteriology.177 (22):6321–29.doi:10.1128/jb.177.22.6321-6329.1995.PMC 177480.PMID 7592405.
  137. ^Hubscher U, Maga G, Spadari S (2002)."Eukaryotic DNA polymerases"(PDF).Annual Review of Biochemistry.71:133–63.doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.71.090501.150041.PMID 12045093.S2CID 26171993. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 26 January 2021.
  138. ^Johnson A, O'Donnell M (2005). "Cellular DNA replicases: components and dynamics at the replication fork".Annual Review of Biochemistry.74:283–315.doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.73.011303.073859.PMID 15952889.
  139. ^abTarrago-Litvak L, Andréola ML, Nevinsky GA, Sarih-Cottin L, Litvak S (May 1994)."The reverse transcriptase of HIV-1: from enzymology to therapeutic intervention".FASEB Journal.8 (8):497–503.doi:10.1096/fasebj.8.8.7514143.PMID 7514143.S2CID 39614573.
  140. ^Martinez E (December 2002). "Multi-protein complexes in eukaryotic gene transcription".Plant Molecular Biology.50 (6):925–47.Bibcode:2002PMolB..50..925M.doi:10.1023/A:1021258713850.PMID 12516863.S2CID 24946189.
  141. ^Thorpe JH, Gale BC, Teixeira SC, Cardin CJ."RCSB PDB – 1M6G: Structural Characterisation of the Holliday Junction TCGGTACCGA".www.rcsb.org. Retrieved27 March 2023.
  142. ^Cremer T, Cremer C (April 2001). "Chromosome territories, nuclear architecture and gene regulation in mammalian cells".Nature Reviews Genetics.2 (4):292–301.doi:10.1038/35066075.PMID 11283701.S2CID 8547149.
  143. ^Pál C, Papp B, Lercher MJ (May 2006). "An integrated view of protein evolution".Nature Reviews Genetics.7 (5):337–48.doi:10.1038/nrg1838.PMID 16619049.S2CID 23225873.
  144. ^O'Driscoll M, Jeggo PA (January 2006). "The role of double-strand break repair – insights from human genetics".Nature Reviews Genetics.7 (1):45–54.doi:10.1038/nrg1746.PMID 16369571.S2CID 7779574.
  145. ^Vispé S, Defais M (October 1997). "Mammalian Rad51 protein: a RecA homologue with pleiotropic functions".Biochimie.79 (9–10):587–92.doi:10.1016/S0300-9084(97)82007-X.PMID 9466696.
  146. ^Neale MJ, Keeney S (July 2006)."Clarifying the mechanics of DNA strand exchange in meiotic recombination".Nature.442 (7099):153–58.Bibcode:2006Natur.442..153N.doi:10.1038/nature04885.PMC 5607947.PMID 16838012.
  147. ^Dickman MJ, Ingleston SM, Sedelnikova SE, Rafferty JB, Lloyd RG, Grasby JA, et al. (November 2002)."The RuvABC resolvasome".European Journal of Biochemistry.269 (22):5492–501.doi:10.1046/j.1432-1033.2002.03250.x.PMID 12423347.S2CID 39505263.
  148. ^Joyce GF (July 2002). "The antiquity of RNA-based evolution".Nature.418 (6894):214–21.Bibcode:2002Natur.418..214J.doi:10.1038/418214a.PMID 12110897.S2CID 4331004.
  149. ^Orgel LE (2004). "Prebiotic chemistry and the origin of the RNA world".Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.39 (2):99–123.CiteSeerX 10.1.1.537.7679.doi:10.1080/10409230490460765.PMID 15217990.S2CID 4939632.
  150. ^Davenport RJ (May 2001). "Ribozymes. Making copies in the RNA world".Science.292 (5520): 1278a–1278.doi:10.1126/science.292.5520.1278a.PMID 11360970.S2CID 85976762.
  151. ^Szathmáry E (April 1992)."What is the optimum size for the genetic alphabet?".Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.89 (7):2614–18.Bibcode:1992PNAS...89.2614S.doi:10.1073/pnas.89.7.2614.PMC 48712.PMID 1372984.
  152. ^Lindahl T (April 1993). "Instability and decay of the primary structure of DNA".Nature.362 (6422):709–15.Bibcode:1993Natur.362..709L.doi:10.1038/362709a0.PMID 8469282.S2CID 4283694.
  153. ^Vreeland RH, Rosenzweig WD, Powers DW (October 2000). "Isolation of a 250 million-year-old halotolerant bacterium from a primary salt crystal".Nature.407 (6806):897–900.Bibcode:2000Natur.407..897V.doi:10.1038/35038060.PMID 11057666.S2CID 9879073.
  154. ^Hebsgaard MB, Phillips MJ, Willerslev E (May 2005). "Geologically ancient DNA: fact or artefact?".Trends in Microbiology.13 (5):212–20.doi:10.1016/j.tim.2005.03.010.PMID 15866038.
  155. ^Nickle DC, Learn GH, Rain MW, Mullins JI, Mittler JE (January 2002). "Curiously modern DNA for a "250 million-year-old" bacterium".Journal of Molecular Evolution.54 (1):134–37.Bibcode:2002JMolE..54..134N.doi:10.1007/s00239-001-0025-x.PMID 11734907.S2CID 24740859.
  156. ^Callahan MP, Smith KE, Cleaves HJ, Ruzicka J, Stern JC, Glavin DP, et al. (August 2011)."Carbonaceous meteorites contain a wide range of extraterrestrial nucleobases".Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.108 (34):13995–98.Bibcode:2011PNAS..10813995C.doi:10.1073/pnas.1106493108.PMC 3161613.PMID 21836052.
  157. ^Steigerwald J (8 August 2011)."NASA Researchers: DNA Building Blocks Can Be Made in Space".NASA.Archived from the original on 23 June 2015. Retrieved10 August 2011.
  158. ^ScienceDaily Staff (9 August 2011)."DNA Building Blocks Can Be Made in Space, NASA Evidence Suggests".ScienceDaily.Archived from the original on 5 September 2011. Retrieved9 August 2011.
  159. ^Marlaire R (3 March 2015)."NASA Ames Reproduces the Building Blocks of Life in Laboratory".NASA.Archived from the original on 5 March 2015. Retrieved5 March 2015.
  160. ^Hunt K (17 February 2021)."World's oldest DNA sequenced from a mammoth that lived more than a million years ago".CNN News. Retrieved17 February 2021.
  161. ^Callaway E (17 February 2021)."Million-year-old mammoth genomes shatter record for oldest ancient DNA – Permafrost-preserved teeth, up to 1.6 million years old, identify a new kind of mammoth in Siberia".Nature.590 (7847):537–538.Bibcode:2021Natur.590..537C.doi:10.1038/d41586-021-00436-x.ISSN 0028-0836.PMID 33597786.
  162. ^Goff SP, Berg P (December 1976). "Construction of hybrid viruses containing SV40 and lambda phage DNA segments and their propagation in cultured monkey cells".Cell.9 (4 PT 2):695–705.doi:10.1016/0092-8674(76)90133-1.PMID 189942.S2CID 41788896.
  163. ^Houdebine LM (2007). "Transgenic animal models in biomedical research".Target Discovery and Validation Reviews and Protocols. Methods in Molecular Biology. Vol. 360. pp. 163–202.doi:10.1385/1-59745-165-7:163.ISBN 978-1-59745-165-9.PMID 17172731.
  164. ^Daniell H, Dhingra A (April 2002)."Multigene engineering: dawn of an exciting new era in biotechnology".Current Opinion in Biotechnology.13 (2):136–41.doi:10.1016/S0958-1669(02)00297-5.PMC 3481857.PMID 11950565.
  165. ^Job D (November 2002). "Plant biotechnology in agriculture".Biochimie.84 (11):1105–10.doi:10.1016/S0300-9084(02)00013-5.PMID 12595138.
  166. ^Curtis C, Hereward J (29 August 2017)."From the crime scene to the courtroom: the journey of a DNA sample".The Conversation.Archived from the original on 22 October 2017. Retrieved22 October 2017.
  167. ^Collins A, Morton NE (June 1994)."Likelihood ratios for DNA identification".Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.91 (13):6007–11.Bibcode:1994PNAS...91.6007C.doi:10.1073/pnas.91.13.6007.PMC 44126.PMID 8016106.
  168. ^Weir BS, Triggs CM, Starling L, Stowell LI, Walsh KA, Buckleton J (March 1997). "Interpreting DNA mixtures".Journal of Forensic Sciences.42 (2):213–22.doi:10.1520/JFS14100J.PMID 9068179.S2CID 14511630.
  169. ^Jeffreys AJ, Wilson V, Thein SL (1985)."Individual-specific 'fingerprints' of human DNA".Nature.316 (6023):76–79.Bibcode:1985Natur.316...76J.doi:10.1038/316076a0.PMID 2989708.S2CID 4229883.
  170. ^"Colin Pitchfork". 14 December 2006. Archived fromthe original on 14 December 2006. Retrieved27 March 2023.
  171. ^"DNA Identification in Mass Fatality Incidents". National Institute of Justice. September 2006. Archived fromthe original on 12 November 2006.
  172. ^Pollack A (19 June 2012)."Before Birth, Dad's ID".The New York Times.ISSN 0362-4331.Archived from the original on 24 June 2017. Retrieved27 March 2023.
  173. ^abBreaker RR, Joyce GF (December 1994). "A DNA enzyme that cleaves RNA".Chemistry & Biology.1 (4):223–29.doi:10.1016/1074-5521(94)90014-0.PMID 9383394.
  174. ^Chandra M, Sachdeva A, Silverman SK (October 2009)."DNA-catalyzed sequence-specific hydrolysis of DNA".Nature Chemical Biology.5 (10):718–20.doi:10.1038/nchembio.201.PMC 2746877.PMID 19684594.
  175. ^Carmi N, Shultz LA, Breaker RR (December 1996)."In vitro selection of self-cleaving DNAs".Chemistry & Biology.3 (12):1039–46.doi:10.1016/S1074-5521(96)90170-2.PMID 9000012.
  176. ^Torabi SF, Wu P, McGhee CE, Chen L, Hwang K, Zheng N, et al. (May 2015)."In vitro selection of a sodium-specific DNAzyme and its application in intracellular sensing".Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.112 (19):5903–08.Bibcode:2015PNAS..112.5903T.doi:10.1073/pnas.1420361112.PMC 4434688.PMID 25918425.
  177. ^Baldi P, Brunak S (2001).Bioinformatics: The Machine Learning Approach. MIT Press.ISBN 978-0-262-02506-5.OCLC 45951728.
  178. ^Gusfield D (15 January 1997).Algorithms on Strings, Trees, and Sequences: Computer Science and Computational Biology.Cambridge University Press.ISBN 978-0-521-58519-4.
  179. ^Sjölander K (January 2004). "Phylogenomic inference of protein molecular function: advances and challenges".Bioinformatics.20 (2):170–79.CiteSeerX 10.1.1.412.943.doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bth021.PMID 14734307.
  180. ^Mount DM (2004).Bioinformatics: Sequence and Genome Analysis (2nd ed.). Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.ISBN 0-87969-712-1.OCLC 55106399.
  181. ^Strong M (March 2004)."Protein nanomachines".PLOS Biology.2 (3) E73.doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0020073.PMC 368168.PMID 15024422.S2CID 13222080.
  182. ^Rothemund PW (March 2006)."Folding DNA to create nanoscale shapes and patterns"(PDF).Nature.440 (7082):297–302.Bibcode:2006Natur.440..297R.doi:10.1038/nature04586.PMID 16541064.S2CID 4316391.
  183. ^Andersen ES, Dong M, Nielsen MM, Jahn K, Subramani R, Mamdouh W, et al. (May 2009). "Self-assembly of a nanoscale DNA box with a controllable lid".Nature.459 (7243):73–76.Bibcode:2009Natur.459...73A.doi:10.1038/nature07971.hdl:11858/00-001M-0000-0010-9362-B.PMID 19424153.S2CID 4430815.
  184. ^Ishitsuka Y, Ha T (May 2009). "DNA nanotechnology: a nanomachine goes live".Nature Nanotechnology.4 (5):281–82.Bibcode:2009NatNa...4..281I.doi:10.1038/nnano.2009.101.PMID 19421208.
  185. ^Aldaye FA, Palmer AL, Sleiman HF (September 2008). "Assembling materials with DNA as the guide".Science.321 (5897):1795–99.Bibcode:2008Sci...321.1795A.doi:10.1126/science.1154533.PMID 18818351.S2CID 2755388.
  186. ^Dunn MR, Jimenez RM, Chaput JC (2017)."Analysis of aptamer discovery and technology".Nature Reviews Chemistry.1 (10) 0076.doi:10.1038/s41570-017-0076. Retrieved30 June 2022.
  187. ^Wray GA (2002)."Dating branches on the tree of life using DNA".Genome Biology.3 (1) REVIEWS0001.doi:10.1186/gb-2001-3-1-reviews0001.PMC 150454.PMID 11806830.
  188. ^Panda D, Molla KA, Baig MJ, Swain A, Behera D, Dash M (May 2018)."DNA as a digital information storage device: hope or hype?".3 Biotech.8 (5) 239.doi:10.1007/s13205-018-1246-7.PMC 5935598.PMID 29744271.
  189. ^Akram F, Haq IU, Ali H, Laghari AT (October 2018). "Trends to store digital data in DNA: an overview".Molecular Biology Reports.45 (5):1479–1490.doi:10.1007/s11033-018-4280-y.PMID 30073589.S2CID 51905843.
  190. ^Miescher F (1871)."Ueber die chemische Zusammensetzung der Eiterzellen" [On the chemical composition of pus cells].Medicinisch-chemische Untersuchungen (in German).4:441–60.[p. 456]Ich habe mich daher später mit meinen Versuchen an die ganzen Kerne gehalten, die Trennung der Körper, die ich einstweilen ohne weiteres Präjudiz als lösliches und unlösliches Nuclein bezeichnen will, einem günstigeren Material überlassend. (Therefore, in my experiments I subsequently limited myself to the whole nucleus, leaving to a more favorable material the separation of the substances, that for the present, without further prejudice, I will designate as soluble and insoluble nuclear material ("Nuclein"))
  191. ^Dahm R (January 2008). "Discovering DNA: Friedrich Miescher and the early years of nucleic acid research".Human Genetics.122 (6):565–81.doi:10.1007/s00439-007-0433-0.PMID 17901982.S2CID 915930.
  192. ^See:
    • Kossel A (1879)."Ueber Nucleïn der Hefe" [On nuclein in yeast].Zeitschrift für physiologische Chemie (in German).3:284–91.
    • Kossel A (1880)."Ueber Nucleïn der Hefe II" [On nuclein in yeast, Part 2].Zeitschrift für physiologische Chemie (in German).4:290–95.
    • Kossel A (1881)."Ueber die Verbreitung des Hypoxanthins im Thier- und Pflanzenreich" [On the distribution of hypoxanthins in the animal and plant kingdoms].Zeitschrift für physiologische Chemie (in German).5:267–71.
    • Kossel A (1881).Untersuchungen über die Nucleine und ihre Spaltungsprodukte [Investigations into nuclein and its cleavage products] (in German). Strassburg, Germany: K.J. Trübner. p. 19.
    • Kossel A (1882)."Ueber Xanthin und Hypoxanthin" [On xanthin and hypoxanthin].Zeitschrift für physiologische Chemie.6:422–31.
    • Albrect Kossel (1883)"Zur Chemie des Zellkerns"Archived 17 November 2017 at theWayback Machine (On the chemistry of the cell nucleus),Zeitschrift für physiologische Chemie,7: 7–22.
    • Kossel A (1886)."Weitere Beiträge zur Chemie des Zellkerns" [Further contributions to the chemistry of the cell nucleus].Zeitschrift für Physiologische Chemie (in German).10:248–64.On p. 264, Kossel remarked presciently: Der Erforschung der quantitativen Verhältnisse der vier stickstoffreichen Basen, der Abhängigkeit ihrer Menge von den physiologischen Zuständen der Zelle, verspricht wichtige Aufschlüsse über die elementaren physiologisch-chemischen Vorgänge. (The study of the quantitative relations of the four nitrogenous bases—[and] of the dependence of their quantity on the physiological states of the cell—promises important insights into the fundamental physiological-chemical processes.)
  193. ^Jones ME (September 1953)."Albrecht Kossel, a biographical sketch".The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.26 (1):80–97.PMC 2599350.PMID 13103145.
  194. ^Levene PA, Jacobs WA (1909)."Über Inosinsäure".Berichte der Deutschen Chemischen Gesellschaft (in German).42:1198–203.doi:10.1002/cber.190904201196.
  195. ^Levene PA, Jacobs WA (1909)."Über die Hefe-Nucleinsäure".Berichte der Deutschen Chemischen Gesellschaft (in German).42 (2):2474–78.doi:10.1002/cber.190904202148.
  196. ^Levene P (1919)."The structure of yeast nucleic acid".J Biol Chem.40 (2):415–24.doi:10.1016/S0021-9258(18)87254-4.
  197. ^Cohen JS, Portugal FH (1974)."The search for the chemical structure of DNA"(PDF).Connecticut Medicine.38 (10):551–52,554–57.PMID 4609088. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 11 February 2017.
  198. ^Koltsov proposed that a cell's genetic information was encoded in a long chain of amino acids. See:
    • Koltsov HK (12 December 1927).Физико-химические основы морфологии [The physical-chemical basis of morphology] (Speech). 3rd All-Union Meeting of Zoologist, Anatomists, and Histologists (in Russian). Leningrad, U.S.S.R.
    • Reprinted in:Koltsov HK (1928). "Физико-химические основы морфологии" [The physical-chemical basis of morphology].Успехи экспериментальной биологии (Advances in Experimental Biology) series B (in Russian).7 (1): ?.
    • Reprinted in German as:Koltzoff NK (1928). "Physikalisch-chemische Grundlagen der Morphologie" [The physical-chemical basis of morphology].Biologisches Zentralblatt (in German).48 (6):345–69.
    • In 1934, Koltsov contended that the proteins that contain a cell's genetic information replicate. See:Koltzoff N (October 1934). "The structure of the chromosomes in the salivary glands of Drosophila".Science.80 (2075):312–13.Bibcode:1934Sci....80..312K.doi:10.1126/science.80.2075.312.PMID 17769043.From page 313: "I think that the size of the chromosomes in the salivary glands [of Drosophila] is determined through the multiplication ofgenonemes. By this term I designate the axial thread of the chromosome, in which the geneticists locate the linear combination of genes; … In the normal chromosome there is usually only one genoneme; before cell-division this genoneme has become divided into two strands."
  199. ^Soyfer VN (September 2001). "The consequences of political dictatorship for Russian science".Nature Reviews Genetics.2 (9):723–29.doi:10.1038/35088598.PMID 11533721.S2CID 46277758.
  200. ^Griffith F (January 1928)."The Significance of Pneumococcal Types".The Journal of Hygiene.27 (2):113–59.doi:10.1017/S0022172400031879.PMC 2167760.PMID 20474956.
  201. ^Lorenz MG, Wackernagel W (September 1994)."Bacterial gene transfer by natural genetic transformation in the environment".Microbiological Reviews.58 (3):563–602.doi:10.1128/MMBR.58.3.563-602.1994.PMC 372978.PMID 7968924.
  202. ^Brachet J (1933). "Recherches sur la synthese de l'acide thymonucleique pendant le developpement de l'oeuf d'Oursin".Archives de Biologie (in Italian).44:519–76.
  203. ^Burian R (1994)."Jean Brachet's Cytochemical Embryology: Connections with the Renovation of Biology in France?"(PDF). In Debru C, Gayon J, Picard JF (eds.).Les sciences biologiques et médicales en France 1920–1950. Cahiers pour I'histoire de la recherche. Vol. 2. Paris: CNRS Editions. pp. 207–20.
  204. ^See:
  205. ^Avery OT, Macleod CM, McCarty M (February 1944)."Studies on the Chemical Nature of the Substance Inducing Transformation of Pneumococcal Types: Induction of Transformation by a Desoxyribonucleic Acid Fraction Isolated from Pneumococcus Type III".The Journal of Experimental Medicine.79 (2):137–158.doi:10.1084/jem.79.2.137.PMC 2135445.PMID 19871359.
  206. ^Chargaff E (June 1950). "Chemical specificity of nucleic acids and mechanism of their enzymatic degradation".Experientia.6 (6):201–209.doi:10.1007/BF02173653.PMID 15421335.S2CID 2522535.
  207. ^Kresge N, Simoni RD, Hill RL (June 2005)."Chargaff's Rules: the Work of Erwin Chargaff".Journal of Biological Chemistry.280 (24):172–174.doi:10.1016/S0021-9258(20)61522-8.
  208. ^"Plaque in Cambridge to honour the man who made DNA decoding possible".Royal Society of Chemistry. Retrieved28 July 2025.
  209. ^"Nobel Prize in Chemistry 1957".The Nobel Prize. Retrieved10 June 2025.
  210. ^Hershey AD, Chase M (May 1952)."Independent functions of viral protein and nucleic acid in growth of bacteriophage".The Journal of General Physiology.36 (1):39–56.doi:10.1085/jgp.36.1.39.PMC 2147348.PMID 12981234.
  211. ^"Pictures and Illustrations: Crystallographic photo of Sodium Thymonucleate, Type B. "Photo 51." May 1952".scarc.library.oregonstate.edu. Retrieved18 May 2023.
  212. ^Schwartz J (2008).In pursuit of the gene: from Darwin to DNA. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.ISBN 978-0-674-02670-4.
  213. ^Pauling L, Corey RB (February 1953)."A Proposed Structure For The Nucleic Acids".Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.39 (2):84–97.Bibcode:1953PNAS...39...84P.doi:10.1073/pnas.39.2.84.PMC 1063734.PMID 16578429.
  214. ^Regis E (2009).What Is Life?: investigating the nature of life in the age of synthetic biology. Oxford:Oxford University Press. p. 52.ISBN 978-0-19-538341-6.
  215. ^"Double Helix of DNA: 50 Years".Nature Archives. Archived fromthe original on 5 April 2015.
  216. ^"Original X-ray diffraction image". Oregon State Library.Archived from the original on 30 January 2009. Retrieved6 February 2011.
  217. ^Burakoff M (25 April 2023)."Rosalind Franklin's role in DNA discovery gets a new twist".AP News. Retrieved25 April 2023.
  218. ^Anthes E (25 April 2023)."Untangling Rosalind Franklin's Role in DNA Discovery, 70 Years On – Historians have long debated the role that Dr. Franklin played in identifying the double helix. A new opinion essay argues that she was an "equal contributor."".The New York Times.Archived from the original on 25 April 2023. Retrieved26 April 2023.
  219. ^Cobb M, Comfort N (25 April 2023)."What Rosalind Franklin truly contributed to the discovery of DNA's structure – Franklin was no victim in how the DNA double helix was solved. An overlooked letter and an unpublished news article, both written in 1953, reveal that she was an equal player".Nature.616 (7958):657–660.Bibcode:2023Natur.616..657C.doi:10.1038/d41586-023-01313-5.PMID 37100935.S2CID 258314143.
  220. ^"The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 1962".Nobelprize.org.
  221. ^Maddox B (January 2003)."The double helix and the 'wronged heroine'"(PDF).Nature.421 (6921):407–08.Bibcode:2003Natur.421..407M.doi:10.1038/nature01399.PMID 12540909.S2CID 4428347.Archived(PDF) from the original on 17 October 2016.
  222. ^Crick FH (1955).A Note for the RNA Tie Club(PDF) (Speech). Cambridge, England. Archived fromthe original(PDF) on 1 October 2008.
  223. ^Meselson M, Stahl FW (July 1958)."The Replication of DNA in Escherichia Coli".Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.44 (7):671–82.Bibcode:1958PNAS...44..671M.doi:10.1073/pnas.44.7.671.PMC 528642.PMID 16590258.
  224. ^"The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 1968".Nobelprize.org.
  225. ^Pray L (2008). "Discovery of DNA structure and function: Watson and Crick".Nature Education.1 (1): 100.
  226. ^Panneerchelvam S, Norazmi MN (2003)."Forensic DNA Profiling and Database".The Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences.10 (2):20–26.PMC 3561883.PMID 23386793.
  227. ^"Crime-fighting successes of DNA".BBC News. 4 October 2006.

Further reading

External links

Library resources about
DNA
Listen to this article (34 minutes)
Spoken Wikipedia icon
This audio file was created from a revision of this article dated 12 February 2007 (2007-02-12), and does not reflect subsequent edits.
(Audio help ·More spoken articles)
Key components
Fields
Archaeogenetics of
Related topics
Lists
Introduction
to genetics
Transcription
Types
Key elements
Post-transcription
Translation
Types
Key elements
Regulation
Influential people
Constituents
Ribonucleic acids
(coding,non-coding)
Translational
Regulatory
Others
Deoxyribonucleic
acids
Analogues
Cloning vectors
Portal:
DNA at Wikipedia'ssister projects:
International
National
Other
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=DNA&oldid=1323748838"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp