This articleneeds attention from an expert in anthropology. The specific problem is:add citations or discredit.WikiProject Anthropology may be able to help recruit an expert.(January 2022)
Acultural universal (also called ananthropological universal orhuman universal) is an element, pattern, trait, or institution that is common to all knownhuman cultures worldwide. Taken together, the whole body of cultural universals is known as thehuman condition.Evolutionary psychologists hold that behaviors or traits that occur universally in all cultures are good candidates for evolutionary adaptations.[1] Some anthropological and sociological theorists that take acultural relativist perspective may deny the existence of cultural universals: the extent to which these universals are "cultural" in the narrow sense, or in fact biologically inheritedbehavior is an issue of "nature versus nurture". Prominent scholars on the topic includeEmile Durkheim,George Murdock,Claude Lévi-Strauss, andDonald Brown.
In his bookHuman Universals (1991), Donald Brown defines human universals as comprising "those features of culture, society, language, behavior, and psyche for which there are no known exception", providing a list of hundreds of items he suggests as universal. Among the cultural universals listed by Donald Brown are:[2]
Based on experiments and studies of accidental and utopian societies, sociologist and evolutionary biologist Nicholas Christakis proposes that humans have evolved to genetically favor societies that have eight universal attributes, including:[5]
The observation of the same or similar behavior in different cultures does not prove that they are the results of a common underlying psychological mechanism. One possibility is that they may have been invented independently due to a common practical problem.[6]
Outside influence could be an explanation for some cultural universals.[7] This does not preclude multiple independent inventions ofcivilization and is therefore not the same thing ashyperdiffusionism; it merely means that cultural universals are not proof ofinnateness.[8]
^Schacter, Daniel L, Daniel Wegner and Daniel Gilbert. 2007.Psychology. Worth Publishers. pp. 26–27
^Brown, Donald (1991).Human Universals. Template University Press.ISBN978-0070082090.
^Anderson, C.; Kraus, M. W.; Galinsky, A. D.; Keltner, D. (2012). "The Local-Ladder Effect: Social Status and Subjective Well-Being".Psychological Science.23 (7):764–71.doi:10.1177/0956797611434537.PMID22653798.S2CID8406753.
^Anderson, Cameron; Hildreth, John Angus D.; Howland, Laura (May 2015). "Is the desire for status a fundamental human motive? A review of the empirical literature".Psychological Bulletin.141 (3):574–601.doi:10.1037/a0038781.PMID25774679.S2CID17129083.
^Nicholas Christakis (2019).Blueprint: The Evolutionary Origins of a Good Society. Little, Brown Spark.
^Language: The cultural tool DL Everett - 2012 - Vintage
^Equal Recognition: The Moral Foundations of Minority Rights, Alan Patten 2014
^Cultures and Globalization: Cultural Expression, Creativity and Innovation, Helmut K Anheier, Yudhishthir Raj Isar 2010
George P. Murdock (1945), "The Common Denominator of Culture", inThe Science of Man in the World Crisis, Ralph Linton (ed.). New York: Columbia University Press.ISBN4871872386
Brief news report of Psychological Bulletin article, Anderson, Hildreth, Howland (2015): Berkeley Haas School of Business. (May 6, 2015)"We all want high social status".ScienceDaily. Berkeley: University of California. Retrieved 24 March 2021
