Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Crocus

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Genus of flowering plants in the family Iridaceae
This article is about the genus of flowers. For the myth of the youth Crocus who was turned into a crocus, seeCrocus (mythology). For other uses, seeCrocus (disambiguation).

Crocus
Crocus sativus growing on a saffron farm in Iran
Crocus sativus
Scientific classificationEdit this classification
Kingdom:Plantae
Clade:Tracheophytes
Clade:Angiosperms
Clade:Monocots
Order:Asparagales
Family:Iridaceae
Subfamily:Crocoideae
Tribe:Ixieae
Genus:Crocus
L.
Type species
Crocus sativus
Sections
  • Crocus
  • Nudiscapus
Synonyms[1]
  • SafranMedik.
  • GeanthusRaf.
  • CrocirisSchur

Crocus (/ˈkrkəs/; plural: crocuses or croci) is agenus of seasonalflowering plants in the familyIridaceae (iris family) comprising about 100species ofperennials growing fromcorms.

They are low growing plants, whose flower stems remain underground, that bear relatively large white, yellow, orange or purple flowers and then become dormant after flowering. Many are cultivated for their flowers, appearing in autumn, winter, or spring. The flowers close at night and in overcast weather conditions.

The crocus has been known throughout recorded history, mainly as the source ofsaffron. Saffron is obtained from the driedstigma ofCrocus sativus, an autumn-bloomingspecies. It is valued as aspice anddyestuff, and is one of the most expensive spices in the world. Iran is the center of saffron production.

Crocuses arenative to woodland, scrub, and meadows from sea level toalpine tundra from theMediterranean, throughNorth Africa, central and southernEurope, the islands of theAegean, theMiddle East and acrossCentral Asia toXinjiang in westernChina. Crocuses may be propagated from seed or from daughter cormels formed on the corm, that eventually produce mature plants. They arrived in Europe from Turkey in the 16th century and became valued as anornamental flowering plant.

Description

[edit]
Illustration of two crocus species from 1891
Crocus sativus &C. vernus,Amédée Masclef,
Atlas des plantes de France, 1891
Botanical illustration of crocus sativus including vertical and crosssection of ovary
Crocus sativus, with ovary sectioned

General

[edit]

Crocus display the general characteristics of familyIridaceae, which include basal cauline (arising from the aerial stem) leaves that sheath the stem base,hermaphrodite flowers that are relatively large and showy, the perianth petaloid with two whorls of three tepals each and septal nectaries. The flowers have three stamens and a gynoecium of three united carpels and an inferior ovary, three locules and axile placentation with fruit that is a loculicidal capsule.[2]

Crocus is anacaulescent (lacking a visible lower stem above ground) diminutive seasonal cormous (growing fromcorms)herbaceous perennialgeophytic genus.[3] The corms are symmetrical andglobose oroblate (round in shape with flatted tops and bottoms), and are covered with tunic leaves that are fibrous, membranous orcoriaceous (leathery). The corms produce fibrousroots, and contractile roots which adjust the corms depth in the soil, which may be pulled as deep as 20 centimetres (8 in) into the soil.[4][5] The roots appear randomly from the lower part of the corm, but in a few species, from a basal ridge.[6]

Leaves

[edit]

Plants produce several basal linear bifacial greenleaves that arise from the corms. These areadaxially (upper surface facing axis) flat or channelled with pale median stripes, while the opposite (abaxial) surface is strongly keeled, with two grooves on either side. The leaves have a distinctive shape in cross-section, being boat-shaped with two lateral arms with margins recurved inwardly towards the central ridged keel, forming the sides of the "boat". The keel may be square or rectangular, but is lacking inC. carpetanus. The pale central stripe is caused byparenchymatous cells which lackchloroplasts and may contain air spaces.[7] The leaves are from 5 to 30 millimetres (316 to1+316 in) wide and 10 to 118 centimetres (4 to 46 in) long. The leaf-likebracts are membranous, while the smaller bracteoles are either membranous or absent.[4][5] The leaf bases are surrounded by up to 5 membranous sheaths calledcataphylls, a specialised leaf. The bases of the cataphylls form the corm tunic, and their number varies from 3 to 6, and enclose the true leaves (euphylls), bracts, bracteoles and flowering stalk.[8][9]

Flowers

[edit]

The number ofpeduncles (flowerstems) vary from one to several and remain underground, emerging only at the fruiting stage, bearing flowers that are solitary or several, so that a truescape is absent. The flowers arepedicellate (attached to the peduncle by a short subterranean pedicel stalk). The pedicel is sometimes subtended (below pedicel) by a membranous, sheathingprophyll (leaf-like structure).[4][5]

The showy, salver to cup-shaped, single or clusteredactinomorphic flowers taper off into a narrow tube; the flowers emerge from the ground, and can be white, yellow, lilac to dark purple, orvariegated incultivars. The flower tube is long, cylindrical and slender, expanding apically. Thefloral tube is long and narrow with 6 lobes in 2whorls. Theperianth is 3+3 (3 sepals+3 petals) andgamophyllous (with fused segments). Thetepal whorls are similar, equal or subequal with a smaller inner whorl, and cupped to outspread. The bracts are membranous, but the inner ones are sometimes lacking.[4][5][10]

The 3stamens are erect and linear and inserted in the throat of the perianth tube, with anthers shorter than the filaments.Pollen grains are inaperturate (apertures absent) but sometimes spiraperturate (spiral shaped).[11] Each flower has a singlestyle which isexserted (projecting beyond thecorolla tube) and slender distally with three to many branches. The branches are highly variable, being short or long, and simple, bifurcate (dividing in two) or multifid and sometimes distally flattened. The inferiorovary has 3 carpels withaxile placentation. It remains underground, and as theseeds ripen, thepedicel (stem of the flower) grows longer so thefruit is above the soil surface.[4][5][12]

Fruit and seed

[edit]

The fruit is a small membranouscapsule, ellipsoid or oblong-ellipsoid in shape and the manyseeds are globose to ellipsoid. The seed surface is highly variable, includingpapillate (covered in small protuberances),digitiform (finger-like) and other epidermal cell types. In some species the seeds arearillate, with fleshy appendages. Crocus seeds have both inner and outerinteguments and in some species the outer epidermis may display long papillae.Embryo-sac development is Polygonum type.Dehiscence (splitting of the capsule to release the seed) is of theloculicidal type in which it splits through the wall of the locules leaving the septa that separate them intact.[13][10][14]

Karyology

[edit]

Crocus has extensiveaneuploidy (abnormal number of chromosomes), with some uncertainty as to the basenumber of chromosomes. The chromosome numbers shows extreme variability, ranging from 2n=6 to 2n=70 even within a single species.[15][11]

Phytochemistry

[edit]

The Iridaceae contain a wide range ofphenolic compounds. However,6-Hydroxyflavones are found only inCrocus, which is alsocharacterised by the presence ofcrocins, water-soluble yellowcarotenoids, in the floral tissues. Crocin is adiester ofcrocetin, responsible for the colour of the styles and stigma ofC. sativus, and hence saffron.[16][17] A few species containmangiferin, a glucosylxanthone.[18][19]

While the flowers may vary dramatically between species, there is little variation in the leaves,[20] but sufficient variability in corm tunics that they may be used as an aid in differentiatingtaxa.[21]

Crocus structures
Crocus corms
Corms with net-like papery tunic
Flower with leaves
Closed flower with leaves
Flower of Crocus vernus
Flower with 3 stamens surrounding central style and stigma
3 stamens and style
3 stamens and style
Stigma seen in centre of opening flower
Central stigma in opening flower
Style and stigma projecting above petals of flower
Exserted style & trifid stigma projecting above corolla
Side view of flower showing stamens and style projecting above corolla
Lateral view
Crocus seedpods
Capsules (seedpods) with seeds
Photograph of whole crocus plant from roots to flower

Taxonomy

[edit]

History

[edit]
Illustration of crocus from illuminated manuscript dated between 1300 and 1330
Croci oriental
Tractatus de Herbis ca. 1300–1330
Illustration of crocus from John Gerard's Historie of Plants 1597]
Crocuses
John Gerard 1597
Crocuses and other flowers from the Hortus Eystettensis of 1613
Crocuses
Hortus Eystettensis 1613

The crocus was well known to the ancients,[22] being described at least as early asTheophrastus (c. 371 – c. 287 BC),[a][24] and was introduced into Britain by the Romans, where the saffron crocus was used as adyestuff. It was reintroduced into Western Europe by theCrusaders. The crocus is mentioned in mediaeval and laterherbals, one of the earliest being the 14th centuryTractatus de Herbis.[25][26]William Turner (1548) states that the crocus is referred to as saffron in English, implying that onlyC. sativus was known at that time.[27] However, by 1597John Gerard writes of "sundry sorts" and uses the term saffron and crocus as interchangeable. He included both spring and autumn flowering crocus, but distinguished Wild Saffron (Crocus) from Meadow Saffron (Colchicum). He described eleven forms. Some of his specimens were obtained fromClusius.[28][29] In the following century,John Parkinson in a more detailed account was more careful to include separate chapters forColchicum, with the common name of meadow saffron, fromCrocus or saffron. Parkinson (1656) states that there are "divers sorts of saffrons" describing 27 spring flowering plants and 4 autumn flowering ones, pointing out that only one of those was the true saffron crocus, which he calledCrocus verus sativus autumnalis.[30] Similar accounts are found in continental European herbals, including those ofl'Obel inFlanders (1576)[31] andBesler'sHortus Eystettensis inBavaria (1613).[32]

The genusCrocus was first formally described byLinnaeus in 1753, with threetaxa, and two species,C. sativus (type species),var.officinalis (now treated as a synonym ofC. sativus) and var.vernus (nowC. vernus) andC. bulbocodium (nowRomulea bulbocodium). Thus Linnaeus recognised two taxa that are accepted as separate species in modern classifications, one vernal and one autumnal crocus, but incorrectly assumed they were only varieties of a single species, while his second species was actually from a closely related genus that was only recognised later (1772).[33] However, a subsequent re-examination of Linnaeus's specimens suggested the presence of several different species that he did not recognise as being separate.[34]Linnaeus' system, based on sexual characteristics,Crocus was classified as Triandra Monogynia (Threestamens, Singlepistil).[35] Linnaeus's system was supplanted by the "natural" system which used ahierarchy oftaxonomic ranks based on weighting of the importance of structural characteristics of the plant.Jussieu (1789) placed the genus Crocus in hisOrdo (family) Irides orLes iris, as a member of the classStamina epigyna (stamens inserted above the ovary) as part of themonocotyledons, the first level of the division of theflowering plants.[36]

Page from Linnaeus' 1753 work describing Crocus
Linnaeus's description ofCrocus 1753

One of the first monographs of the genus appeared in 1809, byHaworth,[37] followed in 1829 by that ofSabine,[38][29] andHerbert in 1847.[39] In 1853,Lindley continued the placement ofCrocus as one of 53 genera inIridaceae, which he included in a higher order of monocotyledons, the Narcissales.[40]Baker published a monograph on the genus in 1874, adopting a very different schema to that of Herbert.[41] In 1883,Bentham and Hooker described the Irideae (Iridaceae) as having more than 700 species, and divided it into 3 tribes and further into subtribes.Tribe Sysyrinchieae as having 2 subtribes, including Ixieae. The latter wascircumscribed with four genera,Crocus,Syringodea,Galaxia (Moraea) andRomulea.[42] This circumscription has remained stable since, with the exception ofMoraea which properly belongs in a separate tribe. The most influential monograph of the nineteenth century was that ofMaw (1886), which forms the basis of modern understanding of the genus. Maw built on the work of Herbert, rejecting Baker's classification.[43] The availability of molecular phylogenetic methods in the late twentieth century has shown that the Iridaceae properly belong within the orderAsparagales.[44]

Botanical illustration

[edit]

The scientific study of the genus in the late eighteenth century was accompanied by detailed descriptions withBotanical illustrations, such as those ofWilliam Curtis (1787) andSims (1803),[45] that appeared inCurtis's Botanical Magazine, with illustrations bySydenham Edwards.[46] Other illustrations are found inmonographs such as those ofHaworth (1809)[37] andSabine (1830), illustrated byCharles John Robertson.[38] The largest collection is found in the most comprehensive monograph, that of Maw (1886).[47] Other sources include the portfolios of plates, such as the survey of the plants of France byMasclef (1891). At that time onlyC. sativus andC. vernus were included in theFlora of France.[48]

Botanical illustration
Illustration of yellow Crocus luteus from 1820
Crocus luteus
A Haworth 1809
Bouquet of 19 different crocus species from 1830
Crocus bouquet of 19 species
Sabine 1830
Hand painted lithograph of Crocus iridiflorus from 1886
C. iridiflorus
Maw 1886

Phylogeny

[edit]

The genusCrocus belongs to themonocotfamilyIridaceae (iris family), specifically the large subfamilyCrocoideae. Within that subfamily, crocus is placed on thetribe, Ixieae (synonym Croceae),[b] one of five. The Ixieae are then subdivided into subtribes, with the generaCrocus,Romulea andSyringodea forming subtribe Romuleinae. The Romuleinae have been characterised within the Ixieae by progressively reduced aerial stems.[51] solitary flowers on the stem branches and woody tunics on the corms. They also often have divided style branches. However,Crocus corm tunics are fibrous and membranous rather than woody as inSyringodea. Also,Crocus has a ridged and often keeled abaxial leaf surface, while that ofSyringodea is rounded, and the midline adaxial translucency ofCrocus is lacking inSyringodea.Romulea is principally distinguished from the other two genera by generally having aerial stems or at least an ovary at ground level, compared with the other acaulescent genera, other differences include unifacial rather than bifacial leaves and the pollen structure.[52][51]

Within the Romuleinae,Crocus is asister group toSyringodea, the two genera forming a sister group toRomulea.[49][53][15]

Subdivision

[edit]

The genus Crocus consists of about 200 accepted species, which continue to increase, and has undergone a large number oftaxonomic classifications.[29] The genus has often been divided intosections, beginning with that of Haworth (1809)[37] who described two sections based on the presence or absence of hairs in the throat of the flower, while Sabine was the first to realise the importance of the presence or absence of a basal spathe (prophyll) in dividing the genus into two sections,[38] a practice followed by Herbert.[39] However, Sabine's practice of using trinomials forvarieties such asC. sulphureus concolor is no longer accepted, although Herbert somewhat similarly used varieties and subvarieties, e.g.C. vernus var.1Communis subvar. 1.Obovatus. Herbert also used geographical distribution as a basis of classification.[29] By the late 19th centuryMaw (1886),[47] following Herbert, subdivided the genus into two divisions, theInvolucrati and theNudiflori, and then further divided it into six sections and lastly by flowering times (spring or autumn). Although rejecting the concept of subvarieties, he placed even more emphasis on geography.[54][15][55][29]

The most widely accepted system, that proposed byBrian Mathew in 1982[56] was based on Maw's system, but with less emphasis on flowering times. This mainly depended on three character states:

  • the presence or absence of a prophyll (a basalspathe);
  • the aspect of thestyle;
  • thecorm tunic.

and included 81 species, however, one of these,Crocus medius was later recognized as asynonym ofCrocus nudiflorus.[15][53]

The genus, as described by Mathew, consisted of two subgenera,Crocirus (monotypic forCrocus banaticus) andCrocus including the remainder of the species, based on whether theanthers were introrse or extrorse (dehiscence directed towards or away from centre of flower) respectively. SubgenusCrocus was then divided into two sections,Crocus andNudiscapus, based on the presence or absence of the prophyll. Each section was then further divided into sixseries ofCrocus and nine ofNudiscapus. These series were defined by the division of the style, the corm tunic, flowering time, leaf structure, presence of abracteole and anther colour. Mathew also introduced the concept ofsubspecies, including 50 in all, by giving similar but differentforms subspecies status if geographically separated, resulting in about 140 distinct taxa.[15] The seven species and ten subspecies discovered since then have been integrated into revisions of this classification, though new species continue to be described,[57][58][59][53] leading to estimates of at least 200 species.[60][29]

Speciation

[edit]

Crocus populations have extremely high infra-specific variability with a very diverse spectrum of morphological and phenotypical varieties, while many individual specimens from different species may closely resemble each other. Based on such morphological differences between isolated populations many new species have been named, but without a definition of new species based on molecular and/or karyological information, species can not be confirmed, creating difficulties in determiningspeciation and hence the exact number of species.[61][62] The situation is even more complex oncehybridisation (combination of taxa) andintrogression (transfer of genetic material) are considered.[63][29]

Molecular phylogeny

[edit]

The availability ofmolecular phylogeny methods revealed problems with the traditional systems based onmorphology alone. The first analysis of the complete genus was carried out by Mathew and colleagues in 2008 usingnucleotide sequences fromplastid regions. In particular, the DNA data suggest there are no grounds for isolatingC. banaticus in its own subgenusCrociris, though it is a unique species in the genus. Because it has a prophyll at the base of the pedicel, it therefore would fall within sectionCrocus, although its exact relationship to the rest of the subgenus remains unclear.[53]

Of the 15 series in the Mathew scheme, only seven weremonophyletic, and in particular the largest series,Biflori andReticulati, which include a third of all species, were non-monophyletic. Another anomalous species,C. baytopiorum, should now be placed in a series of its own, seriesBaytopi.C. gargaricus subsp.herbertii has been raised to species status, asC. herbertii. The autumn-floweringC. longiflorus, thetype species of seriesLongiflori (long regarded by Mathew as "a disparate assemblage"), appeared to lie within seriesVerni. In addition, the position ofC. malyi was currently unclear.[53]

DNA analysis and morphological studies suggest further that seriesReticulati,Biflori andSpeciosi are "probably inseparable",C. adanensis andC. caspius should probably be removed fromBiflori,C. adanensis falls in a clade withC. paschei as a sister group to the species of seriesFlavi andC. caspius appears to be sister to the species of seriesOrientales.[53][15]

The study showed "no support for a system of sections as currently defined", although, despite the many inconsistencies between Mathew's 1982 classification and the current hypothesis, "the main assignment of species to the sections and series of that system is actually supported". The authors state, "further studies are required before any firm decisions about a hierarchical system of classification can be considered" and conclude "future re-classification is likely to involve all infrageneric levels, subgenera, sections and series".[64] A further study, using theinternal transcribed spacer region (ITS) of the nuclear ribosomal DNA (rDNA), together with achloroplast marker, broadly confirmed these findings.[15]

Crocus forms a monophyleticclade, with a basalpolytomy of four subclades. The first clade (A) corresponding to sectionCrocus, but includingC. sieberi and several closely related species (originally included in sectionNudiscapus seriesReticulati). The remaining three clades (B-D) include all the remaining species of sectionNudiscapus. Of these, B and C are small, corresponding to seriesOrientales andCarpetani respectively, with all remaining series in the large D clade. The exception isC. caspius, originally in seriesBiflori, whichsegregates in clade B. Thus, although division of the genus into two sections is well supported, no single morphological character defines these two groups. TheC. sieberi group are assumed to have lost their prophyll secondarily. Of the series, eight could be shown to be monophyletic;Crocus,Kotschyani andScardici (sectionCrocus) andAleppici,Carpetani,Laevigati,Orientalis andSpeciosi (sectionNudiscapus). Flowering season did not correspond to molecular groupings and nor did any of the previously used morphological characteristics, indicating a high degree ofhomoplasy, in which traits are gained or lost independently in different lineages. The remainder of the series could not be supported as natural groupings. Mathew's concept of subspecies status withinC. biflorus could not be supported, each being considered a separate species, resulting in the genus having at least 150 species.[15]

A more detailed molecular and morphological study of seriesVerni (sectionCrocus) allowed it to be better characterised and circumscribed, as well as the closely related seriesLongiflori. SeriesVernisensu Mathew was found to consist of two groups, the first beingC. vernussensu Mathew and the other consisting ofC. etruscus,ilvensis,kosaninii andlongiflorus. The taxonomic status ofC. vernus had been uncertain for some time, given the observation that the name was more properly applied toC. albiflorus,[34] requiring a new designation ofC. neapolitanus for those previously known asC. vernus. SubsequentlyC. vernus was split into 5 separate species. The incorporation ofC. longiflorus into seriesVerni resulted in making seriesLongiflori no longer a legitimate taxonomic unit.[60]

In sectionNudiscapus, seriesReticulati was polyphyletic with species intermingled with seriesBiflori andSpeciosi, requiring a recircumscription, confiningReticulati to 8 species, to obtain monophyly.[65] Among the thereby displaced species, are a number of very closely related taxa, referred to as theCrocus sieberi aggregate, which has been proposed as a new seriesSieberi.[29] Other new series, such asIsauri andLyciotauri, continue to be created out of theBiflori series.[66][67]

Mathew's circumscription ofCrocus introduced the rank of subspecies, of which the largest number (14) were those ofCrocus biflorusMiller, the type species of seriesBiflori, a number which continued to grow. Molecular methods identified these as apolyphyletic assemblage rather than closely related subordinate infraspecific taxa. This necessitated a complete taxonomic revision of seriesBiflori, elevating each subspecies to species status.[61] A similar issue occurs withC. reticulatussensu Mathew, who created two subspecies, resulting in 9 newly defined species.[65]

Sections and species

[edit]
Main article:List of Crocus species

The classification of Brian Mathew (1982), as amended in 2009 divides the genus into two sections, further divided by series.[64] The number of series, continues to evolve.

  • SectionCrocusB.Mathew

Species with a basalprophyll.Type speciesC. sativusL.

6 series
  • SectionNudiscapusB.Mathew

Species without a basal prophyll.Type speciesC. reticulatusStev. exAdams

9 series

Similarly named species

[edit]

Some crocus species, known as "autumn crocus", flower in late summer and autumn, during (autumnal) rains, after summer's heat and drought. The nameautumn crocus is also often used as a common name forColchicum,[68] which is not a true crocus but in its own family (Colchicaceae) in the lily orderLiliales. The plants are toxic, but have medicinal uses.Colchicum are also known asmeadow saffron, though truesaffron is not toxic.[69]Crocus species have three stamens whileColchicum species have six;[70] crocus have one style, whileColchicum have three.[71][10]

SomePulsatilla species are also called "prairie crocus" (previouslyAnemone patens) or "wild crocus", but they belong to the buttercup family (Ranunculaceae).[72][73] Pulsatilla species, which are commonly called pasqueflowers, unlike crocuses haverhizomes, the foliage is covered with long soft hairs, and the flowers are produced on above-ground stems.[74][75]

Etymology

[edit]

"Crocus", the name of the genus, isLate Middle English (late 14th century) and also denotes saffron. It is derived via Latincrocusfrom theGreek κρόκος (krokos),[76] which is itself probably aloan word from aSemitic language, related toHebrew כרכוםkarkōm,[77]Aramaic ܟܟܘܪܟܟܡܡܐkurkama, andArabicكركمkurkum, meaning saffron (Crocus sativus), "saffron yellow" orturmeric (seeCurcuma), another yellow dye.[78] The word ultimately traces back to theSanskritkunkumam (कुङ्कुमं) for "saffron". The English name is a learned 16th-century adoption from the Latinsafranum, but Old English already hadcroh for saffron, introduced by the Romans.[47][79][80]

Distribution and habitat

[edit]

Crocuses are distributed from theMediterranean, from theIberian peninsula andNorth Africa, through central and southernEurope, the islands of theAegean, theMiddle East and acrosscentral andsouthwest Asia toXinjiang in westernChina, but most species are restricted to Turkey andAsia Minor and theBalkans, with theBalkan Peninsula having the largest number of species (at least 31),[59] forming thecentre of diversity, however they are widelyintroduced.[53][1][81][82] The distribution of species is described over five contiguous areas from west to east (seemap).[15]

Distribution map of 16 species of genusCrocus in Europe and Asia

Habitats range from sea level to as high as subalpine altitudes, and in a wide range of habitats from woodlands to meadows and deserts, often on stony mountain slopes with good drainage.[83][20] The majority of species are native to areas with cold winters and hot summers with little rain, and active growth is typically from fall to mid-spring.[14] The natural habitats of crocus species are threatened by human activities, including urbanization, industrialization, and other land disturbances and recreational uses. They are negatively impacted by uncontrolled gathering and heavy grazing by livestock.[84]

  • Crocus alatavicus
    Crocus alatavicus
  • Crocus aleppicus
    Crocus aleppicus
  • Crocus ancyrensis
    Crocus ancyrensis
  • Crocus banaticus
    Crocus banaticus
  • Crocus biflorus
    Crocus biflorus
  • Crocus cancellatus
    Crocus cancellatus
  • Crocus carpetanus
    Crocus carpetanus
  • Crocus cartwrightianus 'Albus'
    Crocus cartwrightianus 'Albus'
  • Crocus caspius
    Crocus caspius
  • Crocus chrysanthus 'Zwanenburg Bronze'
    Crocus chrysanthus
    'Zwanenburg Bronze'
  • Crocus corsicus
    Crocus corsicus
  • Crocus etruscus 'Zwanenburg'
    Crocus etruscus 'Zwanenburg'
  • Crocus flavus
  • Crocus goulimyi
    Crocus goulimyi
  • Crocus graveolens
    Crocus graveolens
  • Crocus hyemalis
    Crocus hyemalis
  • Crocus imperati 'De Jager'
    Crocus imperati 'De Jager'
  • Crocus kotschyanus
    Crocus kotschyanus
  • Crocus laevigatus 'Fontenayi'
    Crocus laevigatus 'Fontenayi'
  • Crocus longiflorus
    Crocus longiflorus
  • Crocus malyi
    Crocus malyi
  • Crocus minimus
    Crocus minimus
  • Crocus nevadensis
    Crocus nevadensis
  • Crocus nudiflorus
    Crocus nudiflorus
  • Crocus olivieri
    Crocus olivieri
  • Crocus pallasii
    Crocus pallasii
  • Crocus pulchellus
    Crocus pulchellus
  • Crocus serotinus subsp. clusii
    Crocus serotinus subsp.clusii
  • Crocus serotinus subsp. salzmannii
    Crocus serotinus subsp.salzmannii
  • Crocus scharojanii
    Crocus scharojanii
  • Crocus tournefortii
    Crocus tournefortii
  • Crocus versicolor
    Crocus versicolor

Ecology

[edit]
Illustrations of germinating crocus seed
Successive stages of germination from seed to seedling (G Maw)

Thelife cycle ofCrocus species begins with theseed,germinating to aseedling, and a mature plant in 3–5 years, however seeds may remain dormant in the soil for several years. The germination stages were first described and illustrated by Maw in his 1886 monograph.[47] In its first year, the crocus produces only a single leaf and creates acorm covered by a thin tunic, about 5–8 mm in size, dependent on the species. In the northern hemisphere, the autumnal crocuses flower between September and November. The vernal (spring) crocuses flowering time depends both on climate and habitat, but is usually mid-winter to spring. Leaves may besynanthous (produced during flowering) orhysteranthous (when the flowers wither away).[85] In the summer, with hot and dry conditions the plant becomes dormant, with all the above ground parts dying back. Colder temperatures in winter then activate the corms.[9] Propagation occurs sexually by seed and asexually by small corms, called cormels or cormlets, produced in the axils of the corms (between tunic scales and body of corm).[10] As the fruit capsule ripens, it emerges from the soil at the base of the flowering stem beforedehiscing (splitting open) and releasing the seeds.[86] Seed dispersal may be enhanced by ants, at least in species witharillate seeds.[18]

At night and in overcast weather, theperianth closes. Theovary producesnectar which attractsbees (particularly femalebumblebees) andLepidoptera.[10][87]

Pests and diseases

[edit]

Cultivated plants may have their corms consumed by mice and otherrodents,[88] includingvoles,squirrels,[89] andchipmunks. They are also attacked by mildew, gray mold, botrytis, and fusarium rot. Root rot may also occur, caused byStromatinia gladioli andPythium species. The nematodePratylenchus penetrans may also cause root rot.[90] Viruses that are known to infectCrocus spp include:Potyviruses, especiallybean yellow mosaic virus and alsotobacco rattle virus,tobaccos necrosis virus, andcucumber mosaic virus.[91] The foliage may experience rot, rust, and scab diseases and be fed upon by aphids, mites, snails, and slugs.[92] The foliage is eaten byhares,rabbits, anddeer; the flowers are sometimes removed by birds, includingcrows,jackdaws, andmagpies.[93]

Cultivation

[edit]
Minoan Fresco of Saffron Gatherer
Saffron gatherers inMinoanfresco,Santorini c. 1650 BC
Photograph of field of saffron crocus growing in Iran
Saffron fields in Iran

Saffron

[edit]
Main article:Saffron

The economic importance of the genus is largely dependent on the single species,Crocus sativus, now known only in cultivation.[94]C. sativus is grown for the production ofsaffron, an orange-red derivative of its driedstigma, and among the most expensive spices in the world.[53] The estimated worldwide production ofC. sativus plants is 205 tons.[8] About 180,000 stigmas from 60,000 flowers are required to produce 1 kilogram (2.2 lb) saffron, which sells for about US$10,000 (2018). Modern saffron production is widely cultivated inKashmir, Iran, Turkey, Afghanistan and the Mediterranean from Spain to Asia Minor.[8] An important center is theeponymous town ofKrokos, in the Kozani region of Greece. The saffron product, Krokos Kozanis is a PDO (Protected Designation of Origin).[95][96] Production is largely indigenous and Iran accounts for 65% of global production, covering 72,162 ha.[8]

Saffron is thought to have been used inembalming inAncient Egypt. It is mentioned in theOld Testament, in theSong of Songs as a precious spice and has featured as a dye and fragrance throughout written history, with mention in theIliad.[8]

Cultivation and harvesting ofC. sativus for saffron was first documented in the Mediterranean, notably on the island ofCrete.Frescos showing them are found there at theBronze AgeMinoan site ofKnossos, as well as from the comparably agedAkrotiri site on theAegean island ofSantorini,[97][98] and formed an important part of the Minoan economy and culture and had both a sacred role and use as apsychoactive drug andfood additive.[99][100][8] Women still gather crocuses in the Akrotiri region.[101]

Horticulture and floriculture

[edit]

Crocuses were described in Turkish gardens in the early sixteenth century,[102] gathered from the far reaches of theOttoman Empire,[103] where they were seen by visiting European botanists and explorers, among the first of whom wasPierre Belon who arrived in Constantinople in 1547. The first crocus seen in theNetherlands, where crocus species were not native, were from corms brought to Vienna in 1562 from Constantinople by the Holy Roman Emperor's ambassador to theSublime Porte,Ogier Ghiselin de Busbecq. A few corms were forwarded toCarolus Clusius at thebotanical garden inLeiden.[20] These were almost certainly cultivated varieties rather than wild species.[104] European visitors to Turkey continued to bring back specimens for gardens in their own country. Prominent among the latter were the gardens atMiddelburg in the Netherlands. Jehan Somer, a Middelburg merchant, brought back crocuses among his other specimens in 1592, where they attracted the attention not only of Clusius but of the early Dutch flower painters, notablyAmbrosius Bosschaert.[105][106] By 1620, new garden varieties had been developed, and featured in contemporary illustrations, such as that ofCrispijn van de Passe in hisHortus floridus of 1614.[105] There are accounts of crocus gardens in the seventeenth century, such as the Saffron Garth of Walter Stonehouse atDarfield, Yorkshire.[107]

Crocuses are among the most importantornamentalgeophytes in the global flower industry,[108] ranking sixth in terms of Dutch bulb production (2003–2008) with 463–668 ha under cultivation.[109] The crocus is one of the most popular flowers found in the garden in the late winter and early spring.[20] About 30 of the species are cultivated, among the most popular beingC. chrysanthus,C. flavus,C. sieberi,C. tommasinianus andC. vernus, together with hundreds of cultivars derived from them.[20][8] Both fall and spring blooming crocuses are cultivated for their flowers.[110] Among the first flowers to bloom in spring, their flowering time can vary from fall to the late winter bloomingC. tommasinianus; the earliest fall blooming species,C. scharojanii, may flower during the last weeks of July.[111]

The varieties cultivated for decoration in gardens and pots mainly represent six species:C. vernus,C. chrysanthus,C. flavus,C. sieberi,C. speciosus andC. tommasinianus. During the horticulture production year 2009/2010, more than 70 cultivars were grown in Holland, covering an area of 366hectares; the most common ones were 'Flower Record' and 'King of the Stripes' which accounted for 42 hectares, other species grown includedC. chrysanthus,C. tommasinianus, andC. flavus - all are spring blooming plants.[112] But the most commonly grown plants are the Dutch hybrids with large flowers in a rich palette of colors.[113]

Both sexual and asexual means are used to increase the number of plants; seeds and multiplication of corms are the most common means of production, buttissue culture can be used,[114] most commonly for saffron crocus. New corms are formed on top of the older corm which withers away, and cormels are produced from axillary buds.[112] The production of new plants begins with harvested corms in late June to early July, after being graded by corm size the corms are stored around 22 Celsius until early October when they are moved to 17 Celsius until planted later in October and November; flowering occurs in March and the flowers are not removed. Crocuses are also forced to produce flowering plants out of season and the most common species used areC. vernus andC. flavus, and most of the corms used for forcing come from the Netherlands.[115]

Spring flowering types are planted in fall, while fall-blooming types in late summer; typically, the corms are placed 3 to 4 inches deep in well-draining soil in areas with full sun exposure. They do not thrive in heavy clay soils or those that are damp, especially during their summer dormancy period.[116] Commercial crops are produced on raised beds and slopes, to ensure adequate drainage, while horticulturalists often plant on sand beds for the same purpose.[117] Spring flowering types also do well in areas with deciduous trees, where they flower and produce leaves before the trees completely leaf-out. Crocuses are grown in USDA winter zones 3–8.[118] Not all species are hardy in the upper zones;C. sativus is winter hardy in USDA zones 6 through 8, andC. pulchellus is hardy in zones 5 through 8.[92]

Some are suitable for naturalizing in grass, but mowing off the foliage before it turns yellow produces short lived plants. Some crocuses, especiallyC. tommasinianus and its selected forms and hybrids (such as 'Whitewell Purple' and 'Ruby Giant'), seed prolifically and are ideal for naturalizing. They can, however, become weeds inrock gardens, where they will often appear in the middle of choice, mat-forming alpine plants, and can be difficult to remove. Crocus flowers and leaves are protected from frost by a waxy cuticle; in areas where snow and frost occasionally occur in the early spring, it is not uncommon to see early flowering crocuses blooming through a light late snowfall.[88]

  • Field of flowering purple crocuses
    Field of flowering purple crocuses
  • Crocus 'E.A. Bowles', a C. chrysanthus hybrid
    Crocus 'E.A. Bowles',
    aC. chrysanthus hybrid
  • Crocus cultivars
    Crocuscultivars
  • Purple crocuses with closed flowers
    Purple crocuses with closed flowers
  • Crocuses appearing through the snow
    Crocuses appearing through the snow

Autumn crocus

[edit]

Autumn-flowering species of crocus that arecultivated include:[85]

C. laevigatus has a long flowering period which starts in late autumn or early winter and may continue into February.

Colchicum autumnale is commonly known as "autumn crocus", but is a member of the plant familyColchicaceae, and not a true crocus (of the family Iridaceae).

Uses

[edit]

The corms of crocuses have been used as foodstuffs in Syria.[119] The carotenoids found in the styles ofCrocus species, particularlyC. sativus have been shown to inhibit cancer cell proliferation, and have led to interest in potential pharmaceutical applications.[15]

Culture

[edit]

The crocus or krokos has been known since ancient times, and used indecorative arts, such as theMinoan wall paintings in Santorini from ca. 1,600 BC.[97] Representations of the saffron crocus appear frequently in Minoan art[99] and pervade Aegean art from theEarly Bronze Age to theMycenaean period.[120]Theophrastos (4th century BC) described the saffron crocus as being valued as a spice and dye, whileHomer compares a sunrise to the flower colour.[121] Saffron coloured robes were much admired by women in antiquity[122] and gave the garment Crocota its name.[123] The oil was also valued as a cosmetic.[124] According to Greek legend Crocus orKrokus (Greek:Κρόκος), was a mortal youth the gods turned into a plant bearing his name, the crocus, after his death caused by his great desire and unfulfilled love for the shepherdessSmilax.[125] Other versions state that as he died three tears fell into the flower becoming its three stigmata.[126][95]

Crocuses occur in many flower paintings, one of the earliest being that ofAmbrosius Bosschaert'sComposed Bouquet of Spring Flowers (1620). In this painting the cream-colored crocus feathered with bronze at the base of the bouquet reflected varieties on the market at that time. Bosschaert, working from a preparatory drawing to paint his composed piece spanning the whole of spring, exaggerated the crocus so that it passes for a tulip, but its narrow, grass-like leaves give it away.[citation needed]

The crocus is used in many contexts to symbolically denote spring and new beginnings. For instance, it was used as the emblem of the2019 FIFA U-20 World Cup inPoland to symbolise the emergence of new talent.[127]

Crocus in art
Illustration of a woman picking saffron crocuses from around 1400
Woman picking saffron crocus
c.1400
(Tacuinum Sanitatis)
Flower painting by Ambrosius Bosschaert 1620
Composed Bouquet of Spring Flowers
Ambrosius Bosschaert c.1620
Saffron crocus from 1614 book
Saffron crocus
Crispijn van de Passe, 1614
Painting of crocuses by Grant Wood from 1912 titled Decorative Landscape with Crocuses
Decorative Landscape with Crocuses
Grant Wood, 1912

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^As a perfume (ἀρωμάτων) "καὶ πρὸς τούτοις τὸ κρόκινον· βέλτιστος δ' ἐν Αἰγίνῃ καὶ Κιλικίᾳ (the saffron-perfume; the crocus which produces this is best in Aegina and Cilicia)". He also refers to the crocus as a spice (at 34), the word being interchangeable for either use[23]
  2. ^Goldblatt originally described this tribe in 2006,[49] but in 2011 renamed it Ixieae, having discovered that this name had precedence[50]

References

[edit]
  1. ^abWCLSPF 2022.
  2. ^Goldblatt et al 1998, pp. 295–296.
  3. ^Meerow 2012, p. 23.
  4. ^abcdeGoldblatt et al 1998.
  5. ^abcdeZhao et al 2004.
  6. ^Goldblatt et al 1998, p. 297.
  7. ^Rudall & Mathew 1990.
  8. ^abcdefgKafi et al 2018.
  9. ^abKerndorff et al 2015.
  10. ^abcdeMabberley 1997.
  11. ^abGoldblatt et al 1998, p. 307.
  12. ^Ali & Mathew 2011.
  13. ^Goldblatt et al 1998, pp. 306, 309–310.
  14. ^abKoocheki & Khajeh-Hosseini 2020.
  15. ^abcdefghijHarpke et al 2013.
  16. ^NCBI 2022a.
  17. ^NCBI 2022b.
  18. ^abGoldblatt et al 1998, p. 311.
  19. ^Mohtashami et al 2021.
  20. ^abcdeHarris 2022.
  21. ^Serviss et al 2016.
  22. ^Caiola & Canini 2010.
  23. ^Liddell & Scott 1996b.
  24. ^Negbi 1989.
  25. ^BL 2022.
  26. ^Pavord 2005, p. 111.
  27. ^Turner 1548.
  28. ^Gerard 1597.
  29. ^abcdefghKerndorff et al 2016.
  30. ^Parkinson 1656.
  31. ^l'Obel 1576.
  32. ^Besler 1640.
  33. ^Maratti 1772.
  34. ^abPeruzzi et al 2013.
  35. ^Linnaeus 1753.
  36. ^Jussieu 1789.
  37. ^abcHaworth 1820.
  38. ^abcSabine 1830.
  39. ^abHerbert 1847.
  40. ^Lindley 1853, p. 161.
  41. ^Baker 1874.
  42. ^Bentham & Hooker 1883, p. 693.
  43. ^Maw 1886, p. 22.
  44. ^APG I 1998.
  45. ^Sims 1803.
  46. ^Davies 2001.
  47. ^abcdMaw 1886.
  48. ^Masclef 1890–1893.
  49. ^abGoldblatt et al 2006.
  50. ^Goldblatt & Manning 2011.
  51. ^abGoldblatt et al 1998, p. 312.
  52. ^Phillips & Rix 1989, p. 31.
  53. ^abcdefghPetersen et al 2008.
  54. ^Mathew 1986.
  55. ^Rix 2008.
  56. ^Mathew 1983.
  57. ^Raca et al 2020.
  58. ^Ciftci et al 2020.
  59. ^abRandelovic et al 2012.
  60. ^abHarpke et al 2015.
  61. ^abHarpke et al 2016.
  62. ^Roma-Marzio et al 2018.
  63. ^Harrison & Larson 2014.
  64. ^abMathew et al 2009.
  65. ^abHarpke et al 2014.
  66. ^Kerndorff et al 2014.
  67. ^Kerndorff et al 2013.
  68. ^Wyman 1986.
  69. ^GBIF 2022.
  70. ^Armitage 2008, p. 278.
  71. ^Bowles 1985, p. 154.
  72. ^Runkel & Roosa 2009, p. 7.
  73. ^Skelly 1994.
  74. ^Wencai & Bartholomew 2004.
  75. ^Armitage 2008, p. 843.
  76. ^Liddell & Scott 1996a.
  77. ^Pankhurst & Hyam 1995, p. 134.
  78. ^OED 2022.
  79. ^Harper 2022.
  80. ^Sharifi 2010.
  81. ^Flora Italiana 2022.
  82. ^Innes 1985.
  83. ^Ruksans 2011, p. 19.
  84. ^Sevinç Kravkaz & Vurdu 2010.
  85. ^abJelitto et al 1990.
  86. ^Toogood 2019.
  87. ^Goldblatt et al 1998, p. 308.
  88. ^abRuksans 2011, p. 17.
  89. ^Heilman 2010, pp. 36–7.
  90. ^Ruksans 2011, p. 35.
  91. ^Caiola & Faoro 2011.
  92. ^abHill & Hill 2012.
  93. ^Ruksans 2011, p. 36.
  94. ^Janick et al 2010.
  95. ^abEuropean Commission 2022.
  96. ^Negbi 1999.
  97. ^abTrakoli 2021.
  98. ^Palyvou 2005, p. 71.
  99. ^abDewan 2015.
  100. ^Betancourt 2007.
  101. ^Palyvou 2005, p. 17.
  102. ^Willes 2011, p. 72.
  103. ^Willes 2011, p. 169.
  104. ^Harvey 1976.
  105. ^abWilles 2011, p. 87.
  106. ^Goldgar 2008, p. 22.
  107. ^Willes 2011, p. 204.
  108. ^Kamenetsky & Okubo 2012, p. xv.
  109. ^De Hertogh et al 2012, p. 2.
  110. ^Viette et al 2015.
  111. ^Ruksans 2011, p. 68.
  112. ^abDe Hertogh et al 2012, p. 81.
  113. ^Bush-Brown et al 1996.
  114. ^Rana 2021.
  115. ^De Hertogh 1992.
  116. ^Tenenbaum 2003.
  117. ^Ruksans 2011, p. 20.
  118. ^Burrell & Hardiman 2002.
  119. ^Goldblatt et al 1998, p. 314.
  120. ^Day 2011.
  121. ^De Hertogh et al 2012, pp. 3–4.
  122. ^Smith 1859, pp. 214, 384, 856, 892.
  123. ^Smith 1859, pp. 369–370.
  124. ^Smith 1859, p. 1214.
  125. ^Lehner & Lehner 2003.
  126. ^Schmitz 1850.
  127. ^FIFA 2018.

Bibliography

[edit]

Books

[edit]

Gardening, horticulture and floriculture

[edit]

Dictionaries and encyclopedias

[edit]

Historical sources (chronological)

[edit]
Antiquity
14th century
16th century
17th century
18th century
19th century

Chapters

[edit]

Articles

[edit]

Phylogeny and taxonomy

[edit]

Novel taxa

[edit]

Historical accounts

[edit]

Websites

[edit]

Organisations and collections

[edit]

Databases and flora

[edit]

External links

[edit]
Crocus at Wikipedia'ssister projects
Crocus
National
Other
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Crocus&oldid=1313986754"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp