Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Cranleigh line

Route map:
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former railway line in South East England

Cranleigh line
Overview
StatusClosed
LocaleSurrey,West Sussex
Termini
Stations6
Service
TypeHeavy rail
ServicesGuildfordHorsham
History
Opened2 October 1865
Closed14 June 1965
Technical
Line length15 mi 48 ch (25.1 km)
Number of tracks1
Track gauge1,435 mm (4 ft 8+12 in)standard gauge
ElectrificationNone
Route map
MapShow zoomable map
Guildford
Bramley & Wonersh
Cranleigh
Baynards
Baynards Tunnel
Rudgwick
Double bridge overRiver Arun
Slinfold
Horsham
Christ's Hospital
For clarity, not all lines north of Guildford and north of Horsham are shown. The tunnels south of Guildford on the Portsmouth Direct line are also omitted.
Show line diagram

TheCranleigh line was a railway line inSouth East England that connectedGuildford inSurrey withHorsham inWest Sussex. It ran for 15 miles 48 chains (25.1 km) from Peasmarsh Junction on thePortsmouth Direct line to Stammerham Junction atChrist's Hospital station on theArun Valley line. It served the villages ofBramley,Cranleigh,Rudgwick andSlinfold. The line was never electrified and was single track withpassing loops atBramley & Wonersh,Cranleigh andBaynards stations.

Construction of the line was started in 1860 by the independentHorsham and Guildford Direct Railway, which was acquired by theLondon, Brighton and South Coast Railway (LB&SCR) in June 1864. The first passenger services ran on 2 October 1865, although remedial works to ease the gradient north of theRiver Arun crossing delayed the opening ofRudgwick station until the following month. Christ's Hospital station was opened on 1 May 1902.

The railway was never financially successful and there were never more than nine return passenger services on weekdays. Freight services were suspended during the 1955 railway workers' strike and never recovered thereafter. The public goods yards closed in October 1962. The line was listed for closure in the 1963Beeching report, and passenger services were withdrawn on 14 June 1965.

Platforms remainin situ at Bramley & Wonersh, Baynards and Christ's Hospital, but the stations at Cranleigh, Rudgwick and Slinfold were completely demolished. The 381 yd long (348 m) Baynards Tunnel, where the line crossed the county boundary between Surrey and West Sussex, was bricked up at both ends and the cutting on the north side was infilled. Much of the route now forms part of theDowns Link path, which connects theNorth Downs Way atSt Martha's Hill to theSouth Downs Way nearShoreham-by-Sea.

Route

[edit]

The Cranleigh line was astandard-gauge railway line inSouth East England. It ran for 15 miles 48 chains (25.1 km) from Peasmarsh Junction on thePortsmouth Direct line to Stammerham Junction atChrist's Hospital station on theArun Valley line.[1] The line was single track throughout and, on its opening in 1865, there was only one passing loop atBaynards station, the approximate half-way point.[2][3] Additionalpassing loops were added atBramley & Wonersh andCranleigh stations in 1876 and 1880 respectively.[3][4]

By the end of 1865, there were five operational stations on the line—at Bramley & Wonersh, Cranleigh, Baynards,Rudgwick andSlinfold. Initially only Baynards had two platforms, with the remainder having only one each. Bramley & Wonersh and Cranleigh each gained a second platform when their passing loops were installed.[3][4] Christ's Hospital station opened in 1902 to servethe school of the same name and an expected local housing development.[5][6][7] It was provided with five platform roads and seven platform faces, of which two roads and three faces served the Cranleigh line.[6][8] The route was never electrified, although an outline proposal to installthird rail on the section north of Cranleigh was put forward by theSouthern Railway in the early 1930s.[9]

AnSR USA class tank engine turns onto the Cranleigh line at Peasmarsh Junction in 1964.

The Cranleigh line diverged from the Portsmouth Direct line at Peasmarsh Junction, around1+34 mi (2.8 km) south ofGuildford station, on a14 mi (400 m) curve with a minimum radius of 12 chains (790 ft; 240 m).[10][11] When it opened, the junction was controlled by a signal box operated by theLondon and South Western Railway (LSWR) and had two diverging tracks, which merged into one at a second signal box, operated by theLondon, Brighton and South Coast Railway (LB&SCR).[12] In 1926, Peasmarsh Junction was altered to a single lead, allowing the abolition of the LB&SCR box, with the former LSWR box controlling all movements between the branch and the main line.[8]

The former triangular junction between the Cranleigh line and theArun Valley line (upper centre)

At Stammerham Junction, the Cranleigh line diverged from the Arun Valley line via a12 mi (800 m) west–north curve with a minimum radius of 26 chains (1,700 ft; 520 m).[11] On opening in 1865, a west–south spur was also provided, sometimes called the "Itchingfield South Fork", which allowed trains to run from Guildford to the south coast without the need for a reversal.[11] No regular scheduled services were timetabled over the spur and the track had been lifted by August 1867.[13][14] The embankment over which the Itchingfield South Fork ran was levelled by ploughing in the mid-20th century and its course is only visible as a field boundary and drainage ditch.[14]

On opening, the Cranleigh line crossed two navigable waterways. TheGodalming Navigation, the stretch of theRiver Wey betweenGuildford andGodalming, was crossed at Peasmarsh. TheWey and Arun Canal, which the line paralleled from Peasmarsh toCranleigh, was crossed on an iron girder viaduct at Whipley Manor.[15][16][a] The Wey bridge was demolished when the line closed, but was reinstated in July 2006 for the use of cyclists, horse riders and pedestrians.[18][19] The canal bridge was also dismantled in the late 1960s and was replaced by acauseway.[18]

The line crossed the county boundary fromSurrey toWest Sussex inside the 381 yd long (348 m) Baynards Tunnel, also called "Rudgwick Tunnel".[20][21] The tunnel was built on a downhill gradient of 1 in 100 from north to south[20] and suffered from condensation and water ingress. Locomotives frequently experiencedpoor rail head conditions and there are several reports of freight trains being brought to a stand inside, due towheelslip.[21][22][23]

The original intention was for the railway to cross the unnavigableRiver Arun by a brick arch bridge, but an inspection carried out before the line opened, determined that the 1 in 80 gradient on the southern approach to Rudgwick station was too steep for trains to operate safely. The gradient was eased to 1 in 130 by raising the embankment, requiring aplate-girder deck to be installed 10 ft (3.0 m) above the original brick arch. The works delayed the opening of Rudgwick station by one month.[24][25]

By 1911, signal boxes were in operation at all six stations on the Cranleigh line.[26][27] South of Baynards, the line was worked using thestaff and ticket system, but the northern part of the line usedelectric tokens instead.[28][29]

Stations on the Cranleigh line(ordered from north to south)
StationDistance from
Horsham[23][30]
Number of platform
roads in 1965
Opening dateOriginal nameRef.
Bramley & Wonersh16 mi 15 ch (26.1 km)2
(originally 1)
2 October 1865Bramley[31]
Cranleigh11 mi 19 ch (18.1 km)2
(originally 1)
2 October 1865Cranley[32]
Baynards8 mi 27 ch (13.4 km)22 October 1865[33]
Rudgwick7 mi 9 ch (11.4 km)11 November 1865[34]
Slinfold4 mi 67 ch (7.8 km)12 October 1865[35]
Christ's Hospital2 mi 31 ch (3.8 km)4
(2 for Cranleigh line)
1 May 1902Christ's Hospital West Horsham[5]

History

[edit]

Proposals and authorisation

[edit]

The first proposal to link Horsham to Guildford by rail was presented to the board of theLondon and South Western Railway (LSWR) in September 1846, but the company declined to support the initiative.[36][b] Over a decade later, in the summer of 1859, two separate schemes to link west Surrey and north-west Sussex were put forward. The first, promoted by an independent company, was to link Guildford and Horsham, while the second, conceived by a group associated with the Wey and Arun Canal, sought to link Guildford toPulborough.[38] The latter scheme failed to make progress, but by February 1860, the increasing likelihood of the Guildford–Horsham line being constructed prompted theLondon, Brighton and South Coast Railway (LB&SCR) to oppose it, fearing that it would allow the LSWR to compete for traffic from Sussex to London.[38]

In spite of the LB&SCR's initial opposition, the promoters of the Guildford–Horsham scheme offered the company the rights to work the new line.[39] The arrangement was formally agreed on 21 June 1860 and, less than two months later, on 6 August, theHorsham and Guildford Direct Railway Act 1860 (23 & 24 Vict. c. clxxx) was grantedroyal assent.[28][38][40] The act allowed the LB&SCR to contribute up to £75,000 (equivalent to £8.9 million in 2023) to the capital requirements of the new line, which was to be built by the Horsham and Guildford Direct Railway (HGDR) company.[40]

Later that year, the HGDR submitted a proposal to Parliament, requesting the right to work over the line betweenWoking andGodalming, which the LSWR opposed.[41] Following negotiations concluded on 7 May 1861, the HGDR withdrew its bill, agreeing not to seek rights to run beyond Guildford. In exchange, the LSWR granted access to Guildford station, on the condition that the HGDR paid a proportion of the cost of providing any additional platforms required for its services.[36]

Over the next three years, the LB&SCR began to exert increasing control of the HGDR. Three new directors of the HGDR were appointed on 8 March 1862, all of whom had an existing connection to the LB&SCR.Robert Jacomb-Hood, the Chief Engineer of the LB&SCR, was invited to take up the same position at the HGDR and, on 28 April that year, the company administration was transferred to the LB&SCR's offices.[42] The two companies were formally amalgamated under theLondon, Brighton and South Coast Railway (additional powers) Act 1864 (27 & 28 Vict. c. cccxiv), with the merger taking effect on 29 June that year.[40][43]

Construction and opening

[edit]

The slow progress of agreeing access to Guildford station with the LSWR, delayed the start of the construction of the Cranleigh line. An initial survey of the route was completed by Edward Woods, who had been appointed Company Engineer by the HGDR in July 1860.[44] Several changes were made to his scheme, including the construction of Baynards Tunnel, which was originally to have been a deepcutting. The board of directors was informed on 27 February 1862 that construction contracts had been let. Robert Jacomb-Hood produced a second survey for the line that April, and Woods left the HGDR at around the same time.[45]

The construction of the route was overseen by Frederick Bannister, who was also an engineer working for the LB&SCR. On 12 February 1863, he raised concerns over slow progress and the following month he noted that the necessary land for the route between Guildford and Cranleigh had not yet been purchased.[45] Nevertheless, track laying had begun by January 1864 and, in the same month, the contract for the construction of the five stations was awarded to John Perry for the cost of £3,698 (equivalent to £459,000 in 2023).[45]

The bridge over theRiver Arun south ofRudgwick station

As the line was nearing completion, an inspection was undertaken by theBoard of Trade (BoT). Although the LB&SCR had hoped to begin public passenger services by 1 June 1865, the opening was delayed several times due to unfinished work.[46] The new railway finally opened on 2 October 1865, butWilliam Yolland, the BoT representative charged with inspecting the route, insisted that Rudgwick station was to remain closed until the steep gradient of 1 in 80 to the south was eased.[29][46] The remedial work included the raising of embankments and a second bridge deck was added 10 ft (3.0 m) above the original brick arch over the River Arun, reducing the gradient to 1 in 130.[24][25] Rudgwick station opened on 1 November 1865.[34][47]

In his inspection reports, Yolland had also expressed dissatisfaction with the method of working for Cranleigh line trains at Guildford. A plan to enlarge Guildford station was agreed between the LB&SCR and LSWR on 24 October 1865;[46] the LB&SCR also committed to pay the latter a proportion of its gross receipts for operating over the1+34 mi (2.8 km) stretch of line north of Peasmarsh Junction.[36] However, over the next few years, disagreements over the LB&SCR's access rights grew. A permanent settlement was not reached until the late 1880s, when the company undertook to pay the LSWR an additional £600 per annum (equivalent to £87,700 in 2023), effective from January 1889.[48]

Late 19th century

[edit]

For much of its existence, the financial performance of the Cranleigh line was poor.[49] The initial passenger service in each direction was four trains per day on weekdays in each direction and two trains on Sundays,[50][51] but in October 1867, the timetable was reduced to only three return trains on weekdays.[52] In the same year, the west–south spur to the Arun Valley line, which had never been used by scheduled services, was closed, eliminating any potential that the Cranleigh line might have had as a through route between the Midlands and the South Coast.[11][53]

North of Cranleigh, the line paralleled the Wey and Arun Canal,[16] which had experienced a short-term increase in income in the early 1860s, when it was used to transport building materials for the railway.[54][c] Once the Cranleigh line had opened, the waterway became unprofitable and its gross receipts were reduced by 50%.[57] The final dividend, 6s per share, was paid in 1865,[54] and the following year, the board recommended that the canal company should be liquidated.[58][d] The waterway was formally abandoned in July 1871, under the terms of theWey and Arun Junction Canal (Abandonment) Act 1868.[60][61]

Bramley & Wonersh station in 1961

Towards the end of the century, developments on the northern half of the line prompted the LB&SCR to increase the service frequency. Two schools,Cranleigh School, Cranleigh, andSt Catherine's School, Bramley, were established in 1865 and 1885 respectively.[23][62] Passing loops and second platforms were installed at Bramley & Wonersh in 1876 and at Cranleigh in 1880,[3][4] allowing up to seven trains per day to operate in each direction.[3] In July 1880, the LB&SCR askedFrederick Banister, its company engineer, to develop a scheme to install a second track between Peasmarsh Junction and Bramley, which would have allowed a further increase in service frequency. No doubling took place[63] and by February 1890, the timetable had been reduced to five trains per day in each direction between Horsham and Guildford, with a single short return working between Horsham and Cranleigh.[64]

Two schemes for new railways serving Cranleigh were put forward at the end of the 19th century. Under the provisions of theLight Railways Act 1896, a line linkingOckley andSelham (nearMidhurst) was proposed, but failed to attract support. Between 1897 and 1899, various routes for a branch from theDorking andHolmwood areas to Cranleigh were suggested, but the railways were opposed by local residents, who feared that the LB&SCR was using the new schemes to block competition from the rival LSWR.[65][66][67]

Early 20th century

[edit]
Christ's Hospital stationc. 1910

The construction ofChrist's Hospital school at the southern end of the line began in 1897, when thefoundation stone was laid in a ceremony on 22 October by the futureEdward VIII, thenPrince of Wales.[68] The school was to relocate fromNewgate, London, where it had been founded in 1552. The Sussex site had previously been the 1,200-acre (490 ha) Aylesbury Dairy Farm, which had closed after the owner had declared bankruptcy.[69][70]

The LB&SCR, which anticipated a large number of pupils travelling to the school every day, constructed new platforms at Stammerham Junction, where the Cranleigh line joined the Arun Valley line.[71][e] The company also hoped to attract housing development to the area, and accordingly named the station "Christ's Hospital West Horsham".[6] The new station, which had separate platforms for the two lines, opened on 1 May 1902.[5][71] On 29 May, 800 pupils arrived by train to begin their education at the Sussex site.[7][73] However, little additional rail traffic was generated for the railway, as the governors of Christ's Hospital elected to enrol boarders only and to not admit day pupils.[71] The anticipated residential development also failed to materialise, in part because the school owned much of the land surrounding the station and did not releaseplots forhousebuilding.[74]

Other developments on the Cranleigh line in the early 20th century, included the installation of a new signal box at Rudgwick in 1911, which replaced the earlier signalling hut that had controlled access to the goods yard.[27] The Sunday service on the line was withdrawn between 1917 and 1919 as a wartime economy measure.[66] On 1 January 1923, the LB&SCR became part of theSouthern Railway (SR).[75] The formation of the SR allowed the rationalisation of infrastructure at Peasmarsh in 1926, where the former LB&SCR signal box was closed and the double-track junction with the Portsmouth Direct line was converted to a single-lead junction with a crossover.[8] Competition for the line, in the form of a new bus service running between Guildford and Horsham, began on 9 April 1923.[76] In the late 1930s, the northern part of the line was proposed for electrification, to allowLondon Waterloo to Guildford viaCobham & Stoke d'Abernon services to be extended to Cranleigh, but the scheme was not developed further.[9][77]

Mid-20th century

[edit]

During the Second World War, the line was available as an alternative route to the main lines from London and theMidlands to the South Coast, and signal boxes were staffed 24 hours a day to allow for emergency diversions.[77][78] An ammunitions depot and anarmy camp for US forces, both served by rail, were established at Baynards Park.[77][78] On 16 September 1942, eight people were killed when an enemy aircraft attacked a passenger train near Bramley & Wonersh station.[79][80] Following the end of the war, the railways of the UK were nationalised under theTransport Act 1947 and the Cranleigh line became part ofBritish Railways on 1 January 1948.[81]

Baynards station in 1961

In the 1940s and 1950s, Baynards was used as a location for films and television. The station appeared in the 1942 comedy,The Black Sheep of Whitehall,[82] and the 1945melodrama,They Were Sisters.[29] Extensive use of the railway was made by the 1957BBC television series,The Railway Children, based onthe novel of the same name byE. Nesbit. Several sequences used anLSWR T9 class locomotive, which did not otherwise run on the line.[83] Later filming at Baynards station included scenes forThe Horsemasters (1961),[84][f]The Grass is Greener (1960),[9] andDie, Monster, Die! (1965).[82] Scenes for the 1965 comedy,Rotten to the Core, were filmed in the Cranleigh line platforms at Christ's Hospital, using anN class locomotive, which was otherwise prohibited on the route.[85][g]

AnLSWR M7 class locomotive atCranleigh station in 1957

Developments on the Cranleigh line in the early 1950s included the introduction ofrailmotors, consisting oftank engines coupled to a type of passenger carriage, known as aballoon trailer. The train would be driven from the locomotive in one direction and, in the other, from a driving position at the front of the carriage.[8] The 1953 timetable included eight services in each direction on the full length of the line on weekdays, with an additional early evening return from Guildford to Cranleigh,[12] but the services were poorly timed for convenient connections at Guildford and Horsham.[77]

All passenger services on the line were suspended during the strike by members of theAssociated Society of Locomotive Engineers and Firemen in mid-1955.[77] Freight traffic never recovered and the daily goods train serving Cranleigh Yard was withdrawn on 10 September 1962.[8][77] Sunday passenger services were suspended from 8 November 1959 and were never reinstated.[86] Horsham shed formally closed in June 1959, but the steam locomotives operating on the Cranleigh line continued to be serviced there until maintenance was transferred to Guildford shed on 15 June 1964.[8]

Closure

[edit]

The firstBeeching report, published in 1963, recommended withdrawing all passenger services and the closure of all stations between Bramley & Wonersh and Slinfold inclusive.[87][88] By this time, the line was running at a loss of £46,000 per year (equivalent to £1.22 million in 2023), and was being used by fewer than 5000 passengers each week.[9] The official notice of closure was published by theBritish Railways Board that September, giving 11 November 1963 as the provisional date from which no trains would run. The board noted that the existing bus services, serving all settlements on the line except Baynards, would continue to run after the railway had closed.[89][90]

A local campaign was launched, resulting in the postponement of the closure. Suggestions were made that a privately operated service could run on the northern part of the line using diesel trains.[91] Apublic inquiry took place in Cranleigh on 10 March 1964, during which objectors noted that a planned programme of housebuilding would increase the village population by around 5000.[92] In March the following year, the Minister of Transport ruled that the line should close on the condition that additional bus services were commissioned. Monday 14 June 1965 was given as the date from which no trains would run.[93]

Since no Sunday service had operated on the Cranleigh line since November 1959,[86] the final day of operation of public services on the line was Saturday 12 June 1965. The last train to depart from Christ's Hospital station was serenaded by boys from the school singingAbide with Me.[94] An enthusiasts' special, which ran the full length of the route on Sunday 13 June 1965, was the final passenger train to operate on the Cranleigh line.[95][96]

After closure

[edit]
A short section of disused rail at Peasmarsh Junction in 2023: The brick arch in the background carries the A3100 over thePortsmouth Direct line.

The Horsham and Guildford Direct Railway Society (HGDRS) was formed in August 1965, with the aim of operating an hourly service on the line on weekdays. The group approachedBritish Railways with an offer to lease the line for a period of five years, after which they would purchase it outright. Additional halts were to be built at Grafham and Shamley Green, and tickets were to be sold on the trains.[97] British Railways refused to lease the line to the society, but instead offered to sell the whole railway, including thefreehold for the stations, for £240,000 (equivalent to £5.87 million in 2023).Hambledon Rural District andSurrey County Councils, which had been in favour of the reopening project, withdrew their support for the HGDRS scheme at the end of 1965.[98]

The formerBaynards station building in 2007

Over the next few months, the track was lifted and, in April 1966, permission was given for the station site at Cranleigh to be used for the Stocklund Square shopping centre development and its associated car park.[99][100][101][h] That December, West Sussex County Council agreed to buy the trackbed from Christ's Hospital to the county boundary at Baynards.[102] In April 1970, much of the route north of Baynards Tunnel was bought by Surrey County Council and Hambledon Rural District Council.[103][104]

The station building at Bramley & Wonersh was demolished,[105] but the platforms were restored and replica level crossing gates were installed in a two-year project, completed in 2005.[106] Since then, the station site has been part of the BramleyConservation Area.[107] The viaduct over the River Wey was dismantled,[18][19] although the double bridge over the River Arun was left intact.[108] Rudgwick and Slinfold stations were demolished and their sites are now occupied by ahealth centre andcaravan park respectively.[109][110][111] Baynards station was sold in 1973 and remains in private ownership.[112][113]

Since 1990, there have been several proposals to reopen the line from Peasmarsh Junction to Cranleigh. The "Study into Rail Line Improvements in Surrey: Network South Central Operating Area", published by Surrey County Council in 1996, determined that reinstatement as a heavy-rail branch or as part of alight-rail system centred on Guildford, was feasible and would alleviate congestion on local roads.[114]Connecting Communities: Expanding Access to the Rail Network, a report published by theAssociation of Train Operating Companies in June 2009, assessed the capital cost of reopening this section as £63 million (equivalent to £107 million in 2023), including stations at Bramley and Cranleigh.[115][116] However, the "Surrey Rail Strategy", published by the county council in September 2013, determined that reinstatement north of Cranleigh was not viable and that passenger numbers "would be insufficient to justify the significant cost".[117] Nevertheless, theCampaign for Better Transport advocacy group called for the reinstatement of the entirety of the line, following the cancellation of the"Restoring Your Railway" programme by the UK government in mid-2024.[118]

Downs Link

[edit]
Main article:Downs Link
The restored Cranleigh line platforms on theDowns Link atChrist's Hospital station

Plans to convert the trackbed of the Cranleigh line to a mixed-use path for walkers, cyclists and horse riders began to emerge around a year after closure, when Hambledon Rural District Council suggested that the route should be turned into a "walking freeway".[119] In 1973, it signed a seven-year lease on the part of the railway that had been purchased by Surrey County Council with the intention of creating a "greenway" between Gosden, north of Bramley, and the border with West Sussex.[120][i] The works included sealing the entrances to Baynards Tunnel with concrete blocks and filling the cutting on the northern approach with inert waste to create a ramped access to Cox Green Road.[124] A strip of land was purchased to enable the path to reach the county boundary, and drainage, fencing and landscaping works were also undertaken. The total cost of £15,000 (equivalent to £229,000 in 2023) was funded from the sale of Baynards station.[125]

The Downs Link, joining theNorth Downs Way atSt Martha's Hill to theSouth Downs Way at St Botolph's nearShoreham-by-Sea, was formally opened on 9 July 1984 at ceremonies at Baynards station and at the southern terminus of the new route. The path was a joint project between Surrey and West Sussex County Councils, and Waverley Borough Council.[126][127] Although much of the former trackbed of the Cranleigh line was incorporated into the Downs Link, the sections of the railway through Peasmarsh and east of Slinfold were not initially included.[113]

TheDowns Link bridge over theRiver Wey

In the early 21st century, two separate projects allowed the path to be extended over additional sections of the former Cranleigh line. Firstly, the demolished railway bridge over the River Wey was rebuilt in July 2006, allowing easier access to the Downs Link from Guildford town centre.[19] Secondly, the 0.87 mi (1.4 km) section of the trackbed west of Slinfold became part of the route in September 2020. The works, which were funded as a collaborative project between Christ's Hospital school and West Sussex County Council, included the restoration of the Cranleigh line platforms at Christ's Hospital station.[128][129][j]

Locomotives

[edit]

The first locomotive to work on the line was a2-2-2 tender engine, designed byJohn Chester Craven and built in 1865 atBrighton works. It was based at Horsham shed until its withdrawal in May 1886.[28] From the mid-1880s,LB&SCR D1 class tank engines, designed byWilliam Stroudley, were introduced on Guildford–Horsham services. Members of this class were namedCranleigh,Rudgwick,Slinfold andBaynards after stations on the line. Two smallerLB&SCR A1 class locomotives, namedBramley andWonersh, were based at Bramley shed.[131][132]

AnSR V "Schools" class locomotive, designed byRichard Maunsell and constructed in June 1935, was namedCranleigh afterCranleigh School.[133][134] Although it never ran in passenger service on the line,[135] the locomotive was exhibited at Cranleigh station that October.[136] An earlier SR V class locomotive, which entered passenger service in December 1932, was similarly namedChrist's Hospital.[134][k]

During theinter-war period, the D1 class locomotives were replaced byLSWR M7 class tank engines, designed byDugald Drummond,[137] working the line until January 1963.[138]SECR H class engines, capable of operatingautotrains, were introduced in the early 1950s, but push-pull working was eliminated from the line in mid-1961. That summer,BR Standard Class 2 2-6-2Ts andLMS Ivatt Class 2 2-6-2Ts, which would operate the majority of passenger services up until closure, began working on the line.[8][139][140]

AnSR Q1 class locomotive nearBaynards station in 1963

Locomotives hauling goods trains in the 1960s includedType 3 diesels[141] andSR Q1 class tender engines,[95] both of which saw occasional use on passenger services.[95][142] Q1 locomotives, based at Guildford shed, were commonly used on the services from Guildford that terminated at Cranleigh.[143] The final passenger train on the line was an enthusiasts' special. It ran on Sunday 13 June 1965, the day after the last scheduled service, and was hauled by two Q1 class engines.[95][96] The following day, a locomotive completed a round trip from Horsham to Baynards to collect a train of empty goods wagons from one of the sidings.[96]

Freight

[edit]
Rudgwick goods yard, to the right of the station platform

Goods facilities had not been constructed by the time the Cranleigh line opened and it was not until 31 October 1865 that the LB&SCR line engineer was instructed to draw up plans for freight depots at the stations.[63] Between 1877 and 1933, coal was delivered by rail to dedicated sidings at Cranleigh gasworks.[144][145] In the late 19th century, livestock and agricultural products were transported from Baynards station via the line, including sheep fromRomney Marsh, which were wintered in the area.[63][49] There was a private siding for a ladder factory at Slinfold, where there was also a brickworks.[8][146] The two other brickworks on the line, at Cranleigh and Baynards, were served by narrow-gauge railways.[147] Two sidings were provided at the north end of Bramley station, one of which was used for coal and the other for general public freight.[148] The goods yard at Rudgwick was equipped with a turntable for wagons.[149][150]

In the early 20th century, a quarry and processing facility forFuller's earth was established on the site of the former brickworks at Baynards.[151] In 1937, it became the site of the Steetley Chemicals Company[141] and a regular supply ofsulphur was delivered by rail to the plant, up until the closure of the line in 1965. An0-4-0 tank engine, originally used at the brickworks, was used to shunt wagons until 1949, when it was replaced by a four-wheeledMotor Rail diesel locomotive.[151] Chemicals manufacture ceased at Baynards in 1989.[141]

The 1955 rail strike prompted several of the companies that received or sent goods via the line, to permanently transfer their operations toroad haulage.[152] The line was closed to public freight on 10 October 1962.[8][153][154]

Accidents and incidents

[edit]
  • 27 August 1863: A surveyor was killed in Baynards Tunnel, while the line was under construction.[155]
  • 21 September 1866: Four passengers were injured when a passenger service from Guildford collided with a goods train that was entering a siding at Bramley.[156]
  • 16 December 1942: Eight people were killed when an enemy aircraft attacked a passenger train near Bramley & Wonersh station.[157][158]
  • 2 December 1961: A train crashed into abuffer stop shortly after departing from Bramley & Wonersh station. It had been misrouted into aheadshunt, after asignaller had incorrectly set thepoints. Only nine passengers were on board the train at the time.[23][159]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^The Cranleigh line crossed theWey and Arun Canal at an oblique angle on an iron girder viaduct designed byCallcott Reilly, who was working as Edward Woods's assistant at the time. Reilly presented a paper to theInstitution of Civil Engineers about the bridge, and a similar structure on theCentral Argentine Railway, and was awarded aTelford Medal as a result.[17]
  2. ^TheLSWR began operating passenger services toGuildford on 5 May 1845.[37]
  3. ^TheWey and Arun Canal, which had opened on 29 September 1816, had been intended to provide a navigable inland route between London and theEnglish Channel, by linking theRiver Wey to theRiver Arun.[55] For the most part, it was used to transport coal and agricultural produce, and through traffic from the capital to the south coast was negligible.[56] It was never financially successful and within four years of its opening, the share price for the canal company had fallen to half its initial value. In the mid-19th century,dividends dropped from £1 per share in 1828 to 5s in 1852.[54]
  4. ^The proposal to close theWey and Arun Canal was contested not only by the waterway's shareholders, but also by the adjoining Godalming and Arun Navigation companies.[59]
  5. ^A small wooden platform had been provided at Stammerham Junction in the late 19th century to loadmilk churns, but had not been used after the owner of Aylesbury Dairy Farm was made bankrupt.[72]
  6. ^Baynards station appears as "Valleywood" in the 1961Disneyland TV show,The Horsemasters.[84]
  7. ^Christ's Hospital station appears as "Longhampton" in the 1965 comedy,Rotten to the Core.[85]
  8. ^TheCranleigh station footbridge was removed and re-erected atLiss station inHampshire.[8]
  9. ^On 1 April 1974,Hambledon Rural District became part of Waverley District,[121] which became theBorough of Waverley on 21 February 1984.[122][123]
  10. ^TheDowns Link extension from theSouth Downs Way at St Botolph's toShoreham-by-Sea opened on 4 October 1993.[130]
  11. ^TheSR V "Schools" class locomotivesChrist's Hospital andCranleigh were withdrawn from passenger service in January and December 1962 respectively.[134]

References

[edit]
  1. ^Turner 1978, p. 147.
  2. ^Mitchell & Smith 1984, Fig. 23.
  3. ^abcdeJackson 1999, p. 60.
  4. ^abcWelch 2001, p. 38.
  5. ^abcQuick 2023, p. 133.
  6. ^abcOppitz 1987, p. 46.
  7. ^ab"A Surrey–Sussex line: Horsham to Guildford – Part 1".Southern Times. No. 3. High Wycombe: Transport Treasury. Autumn 2022. pp. 70–75.ISBN 978-1-91-325134-5.
  8. ^abcdefghij"232: The Cranleigh line".Steam Days. No. 422. October 2024. pp. 19–35.
  9. ^abcdGrayer 2024, p. 3.
  10. ^Welch 2006, p. 38.
  11. ^abcdTurner 1978, p. 146.
  12. ^abMitchell & Smith 1984, Figs 7 and 8.
  13. ^Vine 1996, p. 177.
  14. ^abBuckman 2002, pp. 23–24.
  15. ^Reilly, Callcott (25 April 1865). "Uniform stress in girder work".Minutes of the Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers.24 (1865):391–425.doi:10.1680/imotp.1865.23247.
  16. ^abVine 1996, p. 160.
  17. ^"Professor Callcott Reilly".Minutes of the Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers.142 (1900):376–379. 1900.doi:10.1680/imotp.1900.18806.
  18. ^abcVine 1999, p. 45.
  19. ^abc"Bridge over River Wey".Surrey Advertiser. No. 15784. 14 July 2006. p. 7.
  20. ^abTurner 1978, p. 144.
  21. ^abMitchell & Smith 1984, Fig. 32.
  22. ^Grayer 2024, p. 36.
  23. ^abcdSillince, David (March 1966)."The Horsham & Guildford Direct"(PDF).The Railway Magazine. No. 779. pp. 127–131. Retrieved13 January 2025.
  24. ^abMitchell & Smith 1984, Fig. 38.
  25. ^abGrayer 2024, p. 29.
  26. ^Mitchell & Smith 1984, Figs 14, 18, 26, 39, 43, 45.
  27. ^abGrayer 2024, p. 33.
  28. ^abcVallance, H.A. (September 1950)."The Horsham–Guildford Line, Southern Region"(PDF).The Railway Magazine. No. 593. pp. 584–587. Retrieved22 January 2025.
  29. ^abc"A Surrey–Sussex line: Horsham to Guildford – Part 2".Southern Times. No. 4. High Wycombe: Transport Treasury. Winter 2023. pp. 29–39.ISBN 978-1-91-325135-2.
  30. ^"Sectional Appendix" 2009, SO520.
  31. ^Quick 2023, p. 97.
  32. ^Quick 2023, p. 148.
  33. ^Quick 2023, p. 73.
  34. ^abQuick 2023, p. 396.
  35. ^Quick 2023, p. 419.
  36. ^abcWilliams 1973, p. 59.
  37. ^Williams 1968, pp. 126, 132.
  38. ^abcHodd 1975, p. 7.
  39. ^Buckman 2002, p. 22.
  40. ^abcTurner 1978, p. 143.
  41. ^"Horsham and Guildford Direct Railway Amendment Act".Daily News. No. 4527. 14 November 1860. p. 2.
  42. ^Hodd 1975, p. 11.
  43. ^Hodd 1975, p. 12.
  44. ^Hodd 1975, p. 13.
  45. ^abcHodd 1975, pp. 14–15.
  46. ^abcHodd 1975, p. 17.
  47. ^"The Horsham and Guildford Railway".Sussex Advertiser. 31 October 1865. p. 6.
  48. ^Williams 1973, p. 61.
  49. ^abHodd 1975, p. 33.
  50. ^"The Horsham and Guildford Railway".Surrey Advertiser. No. 67. 30 September 1865. p. 2.
  51. ^"Horsham and Guildford".The Times. No. 25306. London. 3 October 1865. p. 7.
  52. ^"Guildford & Horsham Railway (LB&SCR)".Surrey Advertiser. Vol. IV, no. 175. 26 October 1867. p. 4.
  53. ^Hodd 1975, p. 24.
  54. ^abcVine 1999, p. 11.
  55. ^"From the County Chronicle".The Times. No. 9955. London. 2 October 1816. p. 4.
  56. ^Vine 1999, p. 9.
  57. ^Jackson 1999, p. 61.
  58. ^Vine 1996, p. 178.
  59. ^Vine 1996, pp. 179, 187.
  60. ^"Bramley".West Sussex Gazette. No. 871. 27 July 1871. p. 4.
  61. ^Vine 1999, p. 13.
  62. ^"Bramley: St Catherine's Schools".The West Surrey Times. No. 1604. 26 September 1885. p. 5.
  63. ^abcHodd 1975, p. 34.
  64. ^Mitchell & Smith 1984, Fig. 13.
  65. ^Grayer 2024, p. 54.
  66. ^abOppitz 1988, p. 79.
  67. ^Turner 1979, pp. 68–69.
  68. ^"The Prince of Wales and the new Christ's Hospital".The Times. No. 35343. London. 25 October 1897. p. 13.
  69. ^"Christ's Hospital".West Sussex County Times. 20 January 1894. p. 5.
  70. ^Howard & Legate 2001, p. 7.
  71. ^abcMitchell & Smith 1984, Fig. 44.
  72. ^Oppitz 1987, p. 43.
  73. ^"Christ's Hospital".The Times. No. 36781. London. 30 May 1902. p. 9.
  74. ^Hodd 1975, p. 38.
  75. ^Hodd 1975, p. 39.
  76. ^Bixley, Gerry (7 April 2023) [6 April 2023]."Marking 100 years of buses on the Guildford to Horsham route".Guildford Dragon. Retrieved20 January 2025.
  77. ^abcdefOppitz 1988, p. 80.
  78. ^abJackson 1999, p. 168.
  79. ^Mitchell & Smith 1984, Fig. 12.
  80. ^Jackson 1999, p. 169.
  81. ^"The Southern".Surrey Advertiser. No. 10693. 29 November 1947. p. 4.
  82. ^abGrayer 2024, p. 39.
  83. ^Welch 2001, p. 44.
  84. ^abWelch 2006, p. 39.
  85. ^abMitchell & Smith 1984, Figs 50 and 51.
  86. ^abGrayer 2024, p. 10.
  87. ^Beeching 1963a, pp. 107, 109–112, 118–119.
  88. ^Beeching 1963b, Map 9.
  89. ^"Beeching axes five stations – November 11".Surrey Advertiser. No. 12308. 7 September 1963. p. 15.
  90. ^"British Railways Board: Public Notice – Withdrawal of Railway Passenger Services".Surrey Advertiser. No. 12309. 14 September 1963. p. 2.
  91. ^"Privately run trains on Cranleigh line?".Surrey Advertiser. No. 12309. 14 September 1963. pp. 1–2.
  92. ^"'Minister should step in and stop Horsham line closure': Villagers protest and plead for five-year respite".Surrey Advertiser. No. 12335. 14 March 1964. p. 18.
  93. ^"Commuters lose battle – Cranleigh line to close".Surrey Advertiser. No. 12, 386. 6 March 1965. p. 1.
  94. ^"Guildford rail link ends".West Sussex County Times. 18 June 1965. p. 1.
  95. ^abcdWelch 2007, p. 70.
  96. ^abcHodd 1975, p. 49.
  97. ^"Commuters may save 'axed' line".Surrey Advertiser. No. 12411. 28 August 1965. pp. 1, 17.
  98. ^"Line may cost over £240,000 to reopen".Surrey Advertiser. No. 12429. 1 January 1966. p. 1.
  99. ^"End of a railway".Surrey Advertiser. No. 12446. 30 April 1966. p. 1.
  100. ^Oppitz 1988, p. 81.
  101. ^Grayer 2024, p. 51.
  102. ^"Railway line as route of new by-pass".West Sussex County Times. 9 December 1966. p. 1.
  103. ^Dewhurst, Ernest (13 February 1969). "Turning railways into roads".The Guardian. p. 6.
  104. ^"Downs Link Management Plan". Waverley Borough Council. June 2004. Archived fromthe original on 26 October 2009. Retrieved3 January 2009.
  105. ^White, Steven (30 December 2022)."The lost Surrey railway station that was site of World War II tragedy".Surrey Live. Retrieved19 January 2025.
  106. ^"Making tracks back to the past".Surrey Live. 3 July 2013 [18 February 2005]. Retrieved30 January 2025.
  107. ^"Bramley Conservation Area Appraisal"(PDF). Waverley Borough Council. 19 July 2005. Sections 6.24, 15.2, 16.7. Retrieved29 January 2025.
  108. ^Fox, Thomas (22 August 2022)."Rudgwick's bizarre two-tiered bridge found along abandoned West Sussex railway line walk".Sussex Live. Retrieved19 January 2025.
  109. ^Oppitz 1987, p. 48.
  110. ^Miller 2005, p. 126.
  111. ^"Station site for caravans".West Sussex County Times. 21 July 1972. p. 4.
  112. ^"Council goes on last tour of district".Surrey Advertiser. No. 12821. 6 July 1973. p. 21.
  113. ^abStanbury, Frieda (23 April 1987). "The Downs Link – A railway walk".The Lady. pp. 816–817.
  114. ^Jackson 1999, pp. 221–222.
  115. ^"Connecting Communities – Expanding Access to the Rail Network"(PDF). London:Association of Train Operating Companies. June 2009. pp. 16, 18. Retrieved7 September 2018.
  116. ^Webster, Ben (15 June 2009). "Train companies want to reopen branch lines that Beeching closed".The Times. No. 69662. London. p. 17.
  117. ^"Surrey Rail Strategy"(PDF). Surrey County Council. 12 September 2013. pp. 37, 39. Retrieved7 February 2025.
  118. ^Johnson, Thomas (23 August 2024)."Campaign calls for Restoring Your Railway alternative to reopen abandoned railway lines".New Civil Engineer. Retrieved24 January 2025.
  119. ^"Plan for walking freeway".West Sussex County Times. 6 May 1966. p. 22.
  120. ^"Council votes to sign for old line".Surrey Advertiser. No. 12808. 6 April 1973. p. 1.
  121. ^"Waverley welds historic towns in a new unity".Surrey Advertiser. No. 12950. 1 April 1974. p. S2.
  122. ^Harlow, Amanda (6 January 1984). "Borough plan approved by the Queen".Surrey Advertiser. No. 14609. p. 1.
  123. ^"Waverley collects its borough charter".Surrey Advertiser. No. 14615. 17 February 1984. p. 5.
  124. ^"Hambledon Rural District Council".Surrey Advertiser. No. 12670. 14 August 1970. p. 10.
  125. ^"£15,000 scheme for old railway line".Surrey Advertiser. No. 12834. 5 October 1973. p. 1.
  126. ^"New Downs link for Sussex".Adur Herald. No. 3345. 13 July 1984. p. 11.
  127. ^"Downs Link takes place of defunct railway".Cranleigh Times. No. 8917. 21 July 1984. p. 1.
  128. ^Lock, Rose (19 September 2020)."Missing section of the Downs Link restored with help from Christ's Hospital School".The Argus.Archived from the original on 2 October 2020. Retrieved23 January 2025.
  129. ^"'Missing' section of Downs Link restored". Christ’s Hospital. 24 September 2020.Archived from the original on 23 January 2022.
  130. ^"New link in the route of beauty".West Sussex County Times. 8 October 1993. p. S6.
  131. ^Hodd 1975, pp. 35–36.
  132. ^Morley 1994, p. 25.
  133. ^Swift 2006, p. 14.
  134. ^abcSwift 2006, pp. 80–81, 87, 93.
  135. ^Seymour & Warrington 1984, Fig. 74.
  136. ^"Pride of 'Ownership'".Surrey Advertiser and County Times. Vol. CXXXIII, no. 9817. 2 November 1935. p. 7.
  137. ^Hodd 1975, pp. 39–40.
  138. ^Grayer 2024, p. 37.
  139. ^Mitchell & Smith 1984, Fig. 22.
  140. ^Welch 2006, p. 41.
  141. ^abcGrayer 2024, p. 45.
  142. ^Mitchell & Smith 1984, Fig. 52.
  143. ^Welch 1998, p. 23.
  144. ^Jackson 1999, pp. 191–192.
  145. ^Miller 2005, p. 78.
  146. ^Mitchell & Smith 1984, Fig. 40.
  147. ^Jackson 1999, p. 208.
  148. ^Morley 1994, p. 23.
  149. ^Mitchell & Smith 1984, Fig. 35.
  150. ^Grayer 2024, p. 28.
  151. ^abJackson 1999, pp. 202–203.
  152. ^Hodd 1975, p. 43.
  153. ^Jackson 1999, p. 8.
  154. ^Grayer 2024, p. 24.
  155. ^Hodd 1975, p. 15.
  156. ^"Accident on the Guildford and Horsham Railway".The Times. No. 25611. London. 24 September 1866. p. 10.
  157. ^"Nazi plane guns a train".Surrey Advertiser and County Times. Vol. CXLVII, no. 10421. 19 December 1942. p. 5.
  158. ^Larter, Grahame (19 January 2018) [17 January 2018]."Attack on passenger train in Bramley by the Luftwaffe in December 1942".Surrey Live. Retrieved5 January 2024.
  159. ^"[Untitled photograph with detailed caption]".Surrey Advertiser. No. 12137. 6 December 1961. p. 4.

Bibliography

[edit]

External links

[edit]
Template:Attached KML/Cranleigh line
KML is not from Wikidata

Media related toCranleigh line at Wikimedia Commons

Transport in Surrey
Road
Motorways
A-roads
Service stations
Airports
Rail
Main lines
Closed lines
Stations
Closed stations
Heritage railways
Buses
Stations
Companies
Waterways
Navigable rivers
Canals
Footpaths
National Trails
Long-distance footpaths
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cranleigh_line&oldid=1276883413"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp