Intuitively, a covering locally projects a "stack of pancakes" above anopen neighborhood onto
Intopology, acovering orcovering projection is amap betweentopological spaces that, intuitively,locally acts like aprojection of multiple copies of a space onto itself. In particular, coverings are special types oflocal homeomorphisms. If is a covering, is said to be acovering space orcover of, and is said to be thebase of the covering, or simply thebase. Byabuse of terminology, and may sometimes be calledcovering spaces as well. Since coverings are local homeomorphisms, a covering space is a special kind ofétalé space.
Covering spaces are an important tool in several areas of mathematics. In moderngeometry, covering spaces (orbranched coverings, which have slightly weaker conditions) are used in the construction ofmanifolds,orbifolds, and themorphisms between them. Inalgebraic topology, covering spaces are closely related to thefundamental group: for one, since all coverings have thehomotopy lifting property, covering spaces are an important tool in the calculation ofhomotopy groups. A standard example in this vein is the calculation of thefundamental group of the circle by means of the covering of by (seebelow).[2]: 29 Under certain conditions, covering spaces also exhibit aGalois correspondence with the subgroups of the fundamental group.
Let be a topological space. Acovering of is a continuous map
such that for every there exists anopen neighborhood of and adiscrete space such that and is ahomeomorphism for every.The open sets are calledsheets, which are uniquely determined up to homeomorphism if isconnected.[2]: 56 For each the discrete set is called thefiber of. If is connected (and is non-empty), it can be shown that issurjective, and thecardinality of is the same for all; this value is called thedegree of the covering. If ispath-connected, then the covering is called apath-connected covering. This definition is equivalent to the statement that is a locally trivialFiber bundle.
Some authors also require that be surjective in the case that is not connected.[3]
For every topological space, theidentity map is a covering. Likewise for any discrete space the projection taking is a covering. Coverings of this type are calledtrivial coverings; if has finitely many (say) elements, the covering is called thetrivial-sheeted covering of.
The space is a covering space of. The disjoint open sets are mapped homeomorphically onto. The fiber of consists of the points.
The map with is a covering of theunit circle. The base of the covering is and the covering space is. For any point such that, the set is an open neighborhood of. The preimage of under is
and the sheets of the covering are for The fiber of is
Another covering of the unit circle is the map with for some For an open neighborhood of an, one has:
.
A map which is alocal homeomorphism but not a covering of the unit circle is with. There is a sheet of an open neighborhood of, which is not mapped homeomorphically onto.
Since a covering maps each of the disjoint open sets of homeomorphically onto it is a local homeomorphism, i.e. is a continuous map and for every there exists an open neighborhood of, such that is a homeomorphism.
It follows that the covering space and the base space locally share the same properties.
If is a connected andnon-orientable manifold, then there is a covering of degree, whereby is a connected and orientable manifold.[2]: 234
If is agraph, then it follows for a covering that is also a graph.[2]: 85
If is a connectedmanifold, then there is a covering, whereby is a connected andsimply connected manifold.[5]: 32
If is a connectedRiemann surface, then there is a covering which is also a holomorphic map[5]: 22 and is a connected and simply connected Riemann surface.[5]: 32
Let be theunit interval and be a covering. Let be a continuous map and be a lift of, i.e. a continuous map such that. Then there is a uniquely determined, continuous map for which and which is a lift of, i.e..[2]: 60
If is a path-connected space, then for it follows that the map is a lift of apath in and for it is a lift of ahomotopy of paths in.
As a consequence, one can show that thefundamental group of the unit circle is aninfinite cyclic group, which is generated by the homotopy classes of the loop with.[2]: 29
Let be a path-connected space and be a connected covering. Let be any two points, which are connected by a path, i.e. and. Let be the unique lift of, then the map
Let be a non-constant, holomorphic map between compact Riemann surfaces. For every there exist charts for and and there exists a uniquely determined, such that the local expression of in is of the form.[5]: 10 The number is called theramification index of in and the point is called aramification point if. If for an, then isunramified. The image point of a ramification point is called abranch point.
Let be asimply connected covering. If is another simply connected covering, then there exists a uniquely determined homeomorphism, such that the diagram
A universal covering does not always exist. The following theorem guarantees its existence for a certain class of base spaces.
Let be a connected,locally simply connected topological space. Then, there exists a universal covering
The set is defined as where is any chosen base point. The map is defined by[2]: 64
Thetopology on is constructed as follows: Let be a path with Let be a simply connected neighborhood of the endpoint Then, for every there is apath inside from to that is unique up tohomotopy. Now consider the set The restriction with is a bijection and can be equipped with thefinal topology of[further explanation needed]
The fundamental group actsfreely on by and the orbit space is homeomorphic to through the map
with is the universal covering of theunitary group.[7]: 5, Theorem 1
Since, it follows that thequotient map is the universal covering of.
A topological space which has no universal covering is theHawaiian earring: One can show that no neighborhood of the origin is simply connected.[6]: 487, Example 1
LetG be adiscrete groupacting on thetopological spaceX. This means that each elementg ofG is associated to a homeomorphism Hg ofX onto itself, in such a way that Hgh is always equal to Hg ∘ Hh for any two elementsg andh ofG. (Or in other words, a group action of the groupG on the spaceX is just a group homomorphism of the groupG into the group Homeo(X) of self-homeomorphisms ofX.) It is natural to ask under what conditions the projection fromX to theorbit spaceX/G is a covering map. This is not always true since the action may have fixed points. An example for this is the cyclic group of order 2 acting on a productX ×X by the twist action where the non-identity element acts by(x,y) ↦ (y,x). Thus the study of the relation between the fundamental groups ofX andX/G is not so straightforward.
However the groupG does act on the fundamentalgroupoid ofX, and so the study is best handled by considering groups acting on groupoids, and the correspondingorbit groupoids. The theory for this is set down in Chapter 11 of the bookTopology and groupoids referred to below. The main result is that for discontinuous actions of a groupG on a Hausdorff spaceX which admits a universal cover, then the fundamental groupoid of the orbit spaceX/G is isomorphic to the orbit groupoid of the fundamental groupoid ofX, i.e. the quotient of that groupoid by the action of the groupG. This leads to explicit computations, for example of the fundamental group of the symmetric square of a space.
LetE andM besmooth manifolds with or withoutboundary. A covering is called asmooth covering if it is asmooth map and the sheets are mappeddiffeomorphically onto the corresponding open subset ofM. (This is in contrast to the definition of a covering, which merely requires that the sheets are mappedhomeomorphically onto the corresponding open subset.)
Let be a covering. Adeck transformation is a homeomorphism, such that the diagram of continuous maps
commutes. Together with the composition of maps, the set of deck transformation forms agroup, which is the same as.
Now suppose is a covering map and (and therefore also) is connected and locally path connected. The action of on each fiber isfree. If this action istransitive on some fiber, then it is transitive on all fibers, and we call the coverregular (ornormal orGalois). Every such regular cover is aprincipal-bundle, where is considered as a discrete topological group.
Every universal cover is regular, with deck transformation group being isomorphic to thefundamental group.
Let be the covering for some, then the map for is a deck transformation and.
Let be the covering, then the map for is a deck transformation and.
As another important example, consider the complex plane and the complex plane minus the origin. Then the map with is a regular cover. The deck transformations are multiplications with-throots of unity and the deck transformation group is therefore isomorphic to thecyclic group. Likewise, the map with is the universal cover.
Let be a path-connected space and be a connected covering. Since a deck transformation isbijective, it permutes the elements of a fiber with and is uniquely determined by where it sends a single point. In particular, only the identity map fixes a point in the fiber.[2]: 70 Because of this property every deck transformation defines agroup action on, i.e. let be an open neighborhood of a and an open neighborhood of an, then is agroup action.
Let be a path-connected space and be a connected covering. Let be asubgroup of, then is a normal covering iff is anormal subgroup of.
If is a normal covering and, then.
If is a path-connected covering and, then, whereby is thenormaliser of.[2]: 71
Let be a topological space. A group actsdiscontinuously on, if every has an open neighborhood with, such that for every with one has.
If a group acts discontinuously on a topological space, then thequotient map with is a normal covering.[2]: 72 Hereby is thequotient space and is theorbit of the group action.
Let. The antipodal map with generates, together with the composition of maps, a group and induces a group action, which acts discontinuously on. Because of it follows, that the quotient map is a normal covering and for a universal covering, hence for.
Let be thespecial orthogonal group, then the map is a normal covering and because of, it is the universal covering, hence.
With the group action of on, whereby is thesemidirect product, one gets the universal covering of theklein bottle, hence.
Let be thetorus which is embedded in the. Then one gets a homeomorphism, which induces a discontinuous group action, whereby. It follows, that the map is a normal covering of the klein bottle, hence.
Let be embedded in the. Since the group action is discontinuously, whereby arecoprime, the map is the universal covering of thelens space, hence.
Let be a topological space. The objects of thecategory are the coverings of and themorphisms between two coverings and are continuous maps, such that the diagram
Let be atopological group. Thecategory is the category of sets which areG-sets. The morphisms areG-maps between G-sets. They satisfy the condition for every.
Let be a connected and locally simply connected space, and be the fundamental group of. Since defines, by lifting of paths and evaluating at the endpoint of the lift, a group action on the fiber of a covering, thefunctor is anequivalence of categories.[2]: 68–70
Gimbal lock occurs because any mapT3 →RP3 is not a covering map. In particular, the relevant map carries any element ofT3, that is, an ordered triple (a,b,c) of angles (real numbers mod 2π), to the composition of the three coordinate axis rotations Rx(a)∘Ry(b)∘Rz(c) by those angles, respectively. Each of these rotations, and their composition, is an element of the rotation group SO(3), which is topologicallyRP3. This animation shows a set of three gimbals mounted together to allowthree degrees of freedom. When all three gimbals are lined up (in the same plane), the system can only move in two dimensions from this configuration, not three, and is ingimbal lock. In this case it can pitch or yaw, but not roll (rotate in the plane that the axes all lie in).
However, it is often desirable to represent rotations by a set of three numbers, known asEuler angles (in numerous variants), both because this is conceptually simpler for someone familiar with planar rotation, and because one can build a combination of threegimbals to produce rotations in three dimensions. Topologically this corresponds to a map from the 3-torusT3 of three angles to the real projective spaceRP3 of rotations, and the resulting map has imperfections due to this map being unable to be a covering map. Specifically, the failure of the map to be a local homeomorphism at certain points is referred to asgimbal lock, and is demonstrated in the animation at the right – at some points (when the axes are coplanar) therank of the map is 2, rather than 3, meaning that only 2 dimensions of rotations can be realized from that point by changing the angles. This causes problems in applications, and is formalized by the notion of a covering space.
^Forster, Otto (1981). "Chapter 1: Covering Spaces".Lectures on Riemann Surfaces. GTM. Translated by Bruce Gillian. New York: Springer.ISBN9781461259633.