Movatterモバイル変換


[0]ホーム

URL:


Jump to content
WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia
Search

Cosmopolitan distribution

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Distribution of an organism across all or most of the world

Orcinus orca and its range (in dark blue)

Inbiogeography, acosmopolitan distribution is therange of ataxon that extends across most or all of the surface of the Earth, in appropriatehabitats; most cosmopolitan species are known to be highly adaptable to a range of climatic and environmental conditions, though this is not always so. Killer whales (orcas) are among the most well-known cosmopolitan species on the planet, as they maintain several differentresident andtransient populations in every major oceanic body on Earth, from theArctic Circle toAntarctica and every coastal and open-water region in-between. Such a taxon (usually aspecies) is said to have acosmopolitan distribution, or exhibitcosmopolitanism, as a species; another example, therock dove (commonly referred to as a 'pigeon'), in addition to having beenbred domestically for centuries, now occurs in most urban areas around the world.

The extreme opposite of a cosmopolitan species is anendemic (native) species, or one found only in a single geographical location. Endemism usually results in organisms with specific adaptations to one particular climate or region, and the species would likely face challenges if placed in a different environment. There are far more examples of endemic species than cosmopolitan species; one example being thesnow leopard, a species found only inCentral Asian mountain ranges, an environment to which the cats have adapted over millions of years.[1]

Qualification

[edit]

The caveat "in appropriate habitat" is used to qualify the term "cosmopolitan distribution", excluding in most instances polar regions, extreme altitudes, oceans, deserts, or small, isolated islands.[2] For example, thehousefly is highly cosmopolitan, yet is neither oceanic nor polar in its distribution.[3]

Related terms and concepts

[edit]

The termpandemism also is in use, but not all authors are consistent in the sense in which they use the term; some speak of pandemism mainly in referring to diseases andpandemics, and some as a term intermediate between endemism and cosmopolitanism, in effect regarding pandemism assubcosmopolitanism. This means near cosmopolitanism, but with major gaps in thedistribution, say, complete absence from Australia.[4][5] Terminology varies, and there is some debate whether the true opposite of endemism is pandemism or cosmopolitanism.[6]

Oceanic obstacles

[edit]

A related concept inbiogeography is that ofoceanic cosmopolitanism and endemism. Rather than allow ubiquitous travel, theWorld Ocean is complicated by physical obstacles such as temperature gradients.[7] These prevent migration of tropical species between the Atlantic and Indian/Pacific oceans.[8] Conversely, the Northern marine regions andSouthern Ocean are separated by thetropics, too warm for many species to traverse.

Ecological delimitation

[edit]

Another aspect of cosmopolitanism is that of ecological limitations. A species that is apparently cosmopolitan because it occurs in all oceans might in fact occupy onlylittoral zones, or only particular ranges of depths, or onlyestuaries, for example. Analogously,terrestrial species might be present only in forests, or mountainous regions, or sandyarid regions or the like. Such distributions might be patchy, or extended, but narrow. Factors of such a nature are taken widely for granted, so they seldom are mentioned explicitly in mentioning cosmopolitan distributions.

Regional and temporal variation in populations

[edit]

Cosmopolitanism of a particular species or variety should not be confused with cosmopolitanism of higher taxa. For example, the familyMyrmeleontidae is cosmopolitan in the sense that every continent except Antarctica is home to some indigenous species within the Myrmeleontidae, but nonetheless no one species, nor even genus, of the Myrmeleontidae is cosmopolitan. Conversely, partly as a result of human introduction of unnaturalapiculture to the New World,Apis mellifera probably is the only cosmopolitan member of its family; the rest of the familyApidae have modest distributions.

Even where a cosmopolitan population is recognised as a single species, such as indeedApis mellifera, there generally will be variation between regional sub-populations. Such variation commonly is at the level ofsubspecies,varieties ormorphs, whereas some variation is too slight or inconsistent for formal recognition.

For an example of subspecific variation, consider theAfrican honey bee (Apis mellifera scutellata)—best known for being hybridized with various European subspecies of thewestern honey bee to create the so-called "killer bee"—and theCape honey bee, which is the subspeciesApis mellifera capensis; both of them are in the same cosmopolitan speciesApis mellifera, but their ranges barely overlap.

Other cosmopolitan species, such as thehouse sparrow andosprey, present similar examples, but in yet other species there are less familiar complications: some migratory birds such as theArctic tern occur from the Arctic to theSouthern Ocean, but at any one season of the year they are likely to be largely in passage or concentrated at only one end of the range. Also, some such species breed only at one end of the range. Seen purely as an aspect of cosmopolitanism, such distributions could be seen as temporal, seasonal variations.

Other complications of cosmopolitanism on a planet too large for local populations to interbreed routinely with each other include genetic effects such asring species, such as in theLarus gulls,[9] and the formation ofclines such as inDrosophila.[10]

Examples

[edit]
Originally native to theNorthern Hemisphere, thefly agaric (Amanita muscaria) has gained a cosmopolitan distribution as a result of being introduced to new areas in theSouthern Hemisphere.

Cosmopolitan distributions can be observed both in extinct and extant species. For example,Lystrosaurus was cosmopolitan in the Early Triassic after thePermian-Triassic extinction event.[11]

In the modern world, theorca, theblue whale, and thegreat white shark all have cosmopolitan distribution, extending over most of the Earth'soceans. The waspCopidosoma floridanum is another example, as it is found around the world. Other examples, including species which have gained a cosmopolitan distribution as a result of human assistance, includehumans,cats,dogs, thewestern honey bee,brown rats, themushroomAmanita muscaria,[12] the folioselichenParmelia sulcata, and themollusc genusMytilus.[13] The term can also apply to some diseases. It may result from a broad range of environmental tolerances[14][15] or from rapiddispersal compared to the time needed forspeciation.[16] Cosmopolitan species of birds include themallard andperegrine falcon.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^Z. Jack Tseng; Xiaoming Wang; Graham J. Slater; Gary T. Takeuchi; Qiang Li; Juan Liu; Guangpu Xie (2014)."Himalayan Fossils of the Oldest Known Pantherine Establish Ancient Origin of Big Cats".Proceedings: Biological Sciences.281 (1774):1–7.JSTOR 43600250.
  2. ^Encyclopedia of Ecology and Environmental Management. John Wiley & Sons. 15 July 2009. p. 164.ISBN 978-1-4443-1324-6.
  3. ^Richard C. Russell; Domenico Otranto; Richard L. Wall (2013).The Encyclopedia of Medical and Veterinary Entomology. CABI. p. 157.ISBN 978-1-78064-037-2.
  4. ^Michael G. Simpson (19 July 2010).Plant Systematics. Academic Press. p. 720.ISBN 978-0-08-092208-9.
  5. ^D. A. T. Harper; T. Servais (27 January 2014).Early Palaeozoic Biogeography and Palaeogeography. Geological Society of London. p. 31.ISBN 978-1-86239-373-8.
  6. ^Eduardo H Rapoport (22 October 2013).Areography: Geographical Strategies of Species. Elsevier. p. 251.ISBN 978-1-4831-5277-6.
  7. ^Waters, Jonathan M. (July 2008)."Marine biogeographical disjunction in temperate Australia: historical landbridge, contemporary currents, or both?".Diversity and Distributions.14 (4):692–700.Bibcode:2008DivDi..14..692W.doi:10.1111/j.1472-4642.2008.00481.x.ISSN 1366-9516.
  8. ^Zarzyczny, Karolina M.; Rius, Marc; Williams, Suzanne T.; Fenberg, Phillip B. (March 2024)."The ecological and evolutionary consequences of tropicalisation"(PDF).Trends in Ecology & Evolution.39 (3):267–279.Bibcode:2024TEcoE..39..267Z.doi:10.1016/j.tree.2023.10.006.ISSN 0169-5347.PMID 38030539.
  9. ^Werner Kunz (2 August 2013).Do Species Exist: Principles of Taxonomic Classification. Wiley. p. 211.ISBN 978-3-527-66426-9.
  10. ^Costas B. Krimbas; Jeffrey R. Powell (21 August 1992).Drosophila Inversion Polymorphism. CRC Press. p. 23.ISBN 978-0-8493-6547-8.
  11. ^Sahney, S.; Benton, M. J. (2008)."Recovery from the most profound mass extinction of all time".Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.275 (1636):759–65.doi:10.1098/rspb.2007.1370.PMC 2596898.PMID 18198148.
  12. ^Geml, J.; Laursen, G. A.; O'neill, K.; Nusbaum, H. C.; Taylor, D. L. (January 2006). "Beringian origins and cryptic speciation events in the fly agaric (Amanita muscaria)".Molecular Ecology.15 (1):225–239.Bibcode:2006MolEc..15..225G.doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02799.x.ISSN 0962-1083.PMID 16367842.
  13. ^Ian F. Spellerberg; John William David Sawyer, eds. (1999)."Ecological patterns and types of species distribution".An Introduction to Applied Biogeography.Cambridge University Press. pp. 108–132.ISBN 978-0-521-45712-5.
  14. ^S. Kustanowich (1963)."Distribution of planktonic foraminifera in surface sediments of the south-west Pacific".New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics.6 (4):534–565.doi:10.1080/00288306.1963.10420065.
  15. ^D. B. Williams (1971)."The distribution of marine dinoflagellates in relation to physical and chemical conditions". In B. M. Funnell; W. R. Riedel (eds.).The Micropalaeontology of Oceans: Proceedings of the Symposium held in Cambridge from 10 to 17 September 1967 under the title 'Micropalaeontology of Marine Bottom Sediments'.Cambridge University Press. pp. 91–95.ISBN 978-0-521-18748-0.
  16. ^Judit Padisák (2005)."Phytoplankton". In Patrick E. O'Sullivan; Colin S. Reynolds (eds.).Limnology and Limnetic Ecology. The Lakes Handbook. Vol. 1.Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 251–308.ISBN 978-0-632-04797-0.

External links

[edit]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cosmopolitan_distribution&oldid=1310989561"
Categories:
Hidden categories:

[8]ページ先頭

©2009-2025 Movatter.jp