This article'slead sectionmay be too short to adequatelysummarize the key points. Please consider expanding the lead toprovide an accessible overview of all important aspects of the article.(October 2023)

Ineconomics,convex preferences are an individual's ordering of various outcomes, typically with regard to the amounts of various goods consumed, with the property that, roughly speaking, "averages are better than the extremes". This implies that the consumer prefers a variety of goods to having more of a single good. The concept roughly corresponds to the concept ofdiminishing marginal utility without requiringutility functions.

Comparable to the greater-than-or-equal-toordering relation${\displaystyle \ge }$ for real numbers, the notation${\displaystyle ⪰}$ below can be translated as: 'is at least as good as' (inpreference satisfaction).

Similarly,${\displaystyle \succ }$ can be translated as 'is strictly better than' (in preference satisfaction), and Similarly,${\displaystyle \sim }$ can be translated as 'is equivalent to' (in preference satisfaction).

Usex,y, andz to denote three consumption bundles (combinations of various quantities of various goods). Formally, a preference relation${\displaystyle ⪰}$ on theconsumption setX is calledconvex if whenever

${\displaystyle x,y,z\in X}$ where${\displaystyle y⪰x}$ and${\displaystyle z⪰x}$,

then for every${\displaystyle \theta \in [0,1]}$:

${\displaystyle \theta y+(1-\theta )z⪰x}$.

i.e., for any two bundles that are each viewed as being at least as good as a third bundle, a weighted average of the two bundles is viewed as being at least as good as the third bundle.

A preference relation${\displaystyle ⪰}$ is calledstrictly convex if whenever

${\displaystyle x,y,z\in X}$ where${\displaystyle y⪰x}$,${\displaystyle z⪰x}$, and${\displaystyle y\ne z}$,

then for every${\displaystyle \theta \in (0,1)}$:

${\displaystyle \theta y+(1-\theta )z\succ x}$

i.e., for any two distinct bundles that are each viewed as being at least as good as a third bundle, a weighted average of the two bundles (including a positive amount of each bundle) is viewed as being strictly better than the third bundle.^[1][2]

Usex andy to denote two consumption bundles. A preference relation${\displaystyle ⪰}$ is calledconvex if for any

${\displaystyle x,y\in X}$ where${\displaystyle y⪰x}$

then for every${\displaystyle \theta \in [0,1]}$:

${\displaystyle \theta y+(1-\theta )x⪰x}$.

That is, if a bundley is preferred over a bundlex, then any mix ofy withx is still preferred overx.^[3]

A preference relation is calledstrictly convex if whenever

${\displaystyle x,y\in X}$ where${\displaystyle y\sim x}$, and${\displaystyle x\ne y}$,

then for every${\displaystyle \theta \in (0,1)}$:

${\displaystyle \theta y+(1-\theta )x\succ x}$.

${\displaystyle \theta y+(1-\theta )x\succ y}$.

That is, for any two bundles that are viewed as being equivalent, a weighted average of the two bundles is better than each of these bundles.^[4]

1. If there is only a single commodity type, then any weakly-monotonically increasing preference relation is convex. This is because, if${\displaystyle y\ge x}$, then every weighted average ofy andס is also${\displaystyle \ge x}$.

2. Consider an economy with two commodity types, 1 and 2. Consider a preference relation represented by the followingLeontief utility function:

${\displaystyle u(x_1,x_2)=min(x_1,x_2)}$

This preference relation is convex.Proof: supposex andy are two equivalent bundles, i.e.${\displaystyle min(x_1,x_2)=min(y_1,y_2)}$. If the minimum-quantity commodity in both bundles is the same (e.g. commodity 1), then this implies${\displaystyle x_1=y_1\le x_2,y_2}$. Then, any weighted average also has the same amount of commodity 1, so any weighted average is equivalent to${\displaystyle x}$ and${\displaystyle y}$. If the minimum commodity in each bundle is different (e.g.${\displaystyle x_1\le x_2}$ but${\displaystyle y_1\ge y_2}$), then this implies${\displaystyle x_1=y_2\le x_2,y_1}$. Then${\displaystyle \theta x_1+(1-\theta )y_1\ge x_1}$ and${\displaystyle \theta x_2+(1-\theta )y_2\ge y_2}$, so${\displaystyle \theta x+(1-\theta )y⪰x,y}$. This preference relation is convex, but not strictly-convex.

3. A preference relation represented bylinear utility functions is convex, but not strictly convex. Whenever${\displaystyle x\sim y}$, everyconvex combination of${\displaystyle x,y}$ is equivalent to any of them.

4. Consider a preference relation represented by:

${\displaystyle u(x_1,x_2)=max(x_1,x_2)}$

This preference relation is not convex.Proof: let${\displaystyle x=(3,5)}$ and${\displaystyle y=(5,3)}$. Then${\displaystyle x\sim y}$ since both have utility 5. However, the convex combination${\displaystyle 0.5x+0.5y=(4,4)}$ is worse than both of them since its utility is 4.

A set ofconvex-shapedindifference curves displays convex preferences: Given a convex indifference curve containing the set of all bundles (of two or more goods) that are all viewed as equally desired, the set of all goods bundles that are viewed as being at least as desired as those on the indifference curve is aconvex set.

Convex preferences with their associated convex indifference mapping arise fromquasi-concave utility functions, although these are not necessary for the analysis of preferences. For example,Constant Elasticity of Substitution (CES) utility functions describe convex,homothetic preferences. CES preferences are self-dual and both primal and dual CES preferences yield systems of indifference curves that may exhibit any degree of convexity.^[5]

• Convex function
• Level set
• Quasi-convex function
• Semi-continuous function
• Shapley–Folkman lemma

• Economics curves
• Utility function types

• Articles with short description
• Short description matches Wikidata
• Wikipedia introduction cleanup from October 2023
• All pages needing cleanup
• Articles covered by WikiProject Wikify from October 2023
• All articles covered by WikiProject Wikify