TheConstitutional Court (German:Staatsgerichtshof,pronounced[ˈʃtaːtsɡəˌʁɪçtshoːf]) ofLiechtenstein is the ultimate legal authority in Liechtenstein. It is based in the capital, Vaduz. The court is a court of public law that is autonomous and independent from all other constitutional bodies.
The Court is established by Article 104 of the 1921 Constitution of Liechtenstein.[1] The detailed rules governing its operation are found in the Law of 27 November 2003 on the Constitutional Court (original German title:Gesetz vom 27. November 2003 über den Staatsgerichtshof (StGHG))[2] and the Rules of Procedure of the Constitutional Court of the Principality of Liechtenstein of 4 February 2019 (Geschäftsordnung des Staatsgerichtshofes des Fürstentums Liechtenstein vom 4. Februar 2019).[3]
The Constitutional Court consists of five judges and five substitute judges (art 1, para 3), all of whom work part-time. The term of office of the judges and substitute judges of the Constitutional Court is five years (art. 3 para. 1). Subject to his right of resignation, a judge of the Constitutional Court can only be appointed or removed from office by the Constitutional Court itself (art. 12 para. 1). The Constitutional Court issues its own rules of procedure (art. 14). The President of the Constitutional Court and the majority of the judges must be Liechtenstein citizens (nationality).[4]
As of August 2025, the judges of the Courts are:
The substitute judges are:[8]
As the Constitutional Court of the Principality of Liechtenstein, the Court ensures that all authorities comply with the fundamental rights guaranteed in the Constitution. Main functions:[9]
The competence of the Constitutional Court to subsequently review the constitutionality of international treaties or individual provisions of international treaties (Article 22) that have already been legally concluded by the Principality of Liechtenstein is disputed in legal theory, since in international law, among other things, the principle ofPacta sunt servanda applies (see also the "Schubert practice" of theSwiss Federal Supreme Court).
This review authority of the Constitutional Court is considered to be very problematic, particularly in view of the Principality's integration into theEuropean Economic Area (EEA). According to Article 23 paragraph 1 of the Constitutional Court Act, if the Constitutional Court finds that an international treaty or individual provisions thereof are incompatible with the constitution, it can revoke the domestic binding nature of the treaty. This could lead to a domestic court having subsequent review authority with regard to EEA law and undermine theprimacy of EEA law, but the EEA process for incorporating EU law has generally proven to be robust.[10]
| International | |
|---|---|
| National | |
| Other | |
