 | This article needs to beupdated. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information.(August 2009) |
 |
|---|
|
 Uruguay portal |
TheConstitution of Uruguay (Constitución de la República Oriental del Uruguay) is the supremelaw ofUruguay. Its first version was written in 1830 and its lastamendment was made in 2004.
Uruguay's firstconstitution was adopted in 1830, following the conclusion of the three-year-longCisplatine War in whichArgentina andUruguay acted as afederation: theUnited Provinces of the Río de la Plata. Mediated by theUnited Kingdom, the1828 Treaty of Montevideo allowed to build the foundations for a Uruguayanstate and constitution. It has been reformed in 1918, 1934, 1942, 1952 and 1967, but it still maintains several articles from its first version of 1830.
When it becameindependent on August 25, 1825, the Oriental Republic of Uruguay (República Oriental del Uruguay) drew up its first constitution, which was promulgated on 18 July 1830.This text has been regarded as Uruguay's most technically perfect charter.[citation needed] Heavily influenced by the thinking of theFrench andAmerican revolutions, it divided the government among theexecutive,legislative, andjudicial powers and established Uruguay as aunitary republic with a centralized form of government. ThebicameralGeneral Assembly (Asamblea General) was empowered to elect apresident with considerable powers to head the executive branch for a four-year term. The president was given control over all of his ministers of government and was empowered to make decisions with the agreement of at least one of the three ministers recognized by the 1830 constitution.[1]
Like all of Uruguay's charters since then, the 1830 constitution provided for a General Assembly composed of aChamber of Senators (Cámara de Senadores), or Senate (Senado), elected nationally, and aChamber of Representatives (Cámara de Representantes), elected from the departments. Members of the General Assembly were empowered to pass laws but lacked the authority to dismiss the president or his ministers or to issuevotes of no confidence. An 1834 amendment, however, provided forjuicio político, orimpeachment, of the ministers for "unacceptable conduct".[1]
As established by the 1830 constitution, theSupreme Court of Justice (Suprema Corte de Justicia), and lesser courts, exercised the judicial power. The General Assembly appointed the members of the high court. The latter – with the consent of the Senate in the case of the appellate courts – appointed the members of the lesser courts. The constitution also divided the country intodepartments, each headed by agovernor appointed by the president and each having an advisory body called a Neighbors' Council (Consejo de Vecinos).[1]
Although the 1830 constitution remained in effect for eighty-seven years,de facto governments violated it repeatedly. In the 1878-90 period, theBlancos andColorados initiated the framework for a more stable system through understandings called "pacts between the parties." This governing principle, called coparticipation (coparticipación), meaning the sharing of formal political and informalbureaucratic power, has been formally practiced since 1872.[1]
The anniversary of the 1830 promulgation of this original constitution on July 18 is now apublic holiday in Uruguay.
In 1913PresidentJosé Batlle y Ordóñez (1903–07, 1911–15), the father of modern Uruguay, proposed a constitutional reform involving the creation of aSwiss-style collegial executive system to be called thecolegiado. A strong opponent of the one-person, powerful presidency, Batlle y Ordóñez believed that a collective executive power would neutralize thedictatorial intentions of political leaders. It met intense opposition, however, not only from the Blancos but also from members of his own Colorado Party. The proposal was defeated in 1916, but Batlle y Ordóñez worked out a deal with a faction of the Blancos whereby a compromise system was provided for in the second constitution, which was approved bya plebiscite on 25 November 1917.[1]
The history of successive constitutions is one of a lengthy struggle between advocates of the collegial system and those of thepresidential system. Although the 1917 constitution worked well during the prosperous time afterWorld War I, recurring conflicts between the president and thecolegiado members made the executive power ineffective in coping with the economic and social crises wracking the country. These conflicts eventually led to the presidentialcoup of 1933. The authorities suspended the constitution and appointed a constituent assembly to draw up a new one.[1]
The 1934 constitution abolished thecolegiado and transferred its power to the president. Nevertheless, presidential powers remained somewhat limited. The executive power once again was exercised by a president who had to make decisions together with the ministers. The 1934 charter established the Council of Ministers (Consejo de Ministros) as the body in which these decisions were to be made. This council consisted of the president and thecabinet ministers. The constitution required the chief executive to appoint three of the nine cabinet ministers from among the members of the political party that received the second largest number of votes in the presidential election. The General Assembly, for its part, could issue votes of no confidence in cabinet ministers, with the approval of two-thirds of its members.[1]
The constitution divided the Senate between the Blancos and the Colorados or, as political scientist Martin Weinstein has pointed out, between the Herrerist faction of the Blancos (named afterLuis Alberto de Herrera) and the Terrist wing of the Colorados (named afterGabriel Terra; president, 1931–38). The party that garnered the second largest number of votes automatically received 50 percent of the Senate seats. In addition, the 1934 charter empowered the Supreme Court of Justice to rule on the constitutionality of the laws. This system, which lasted eighteen years, further limited the power of the president and his government.[1]
![[icon]](/mt/?noimg=&dark=on&url=https%3a%2f%2fen.wikipedia.org%2fwiki%2fFile%3aWiki_letter_w_cropped.svg) | This sectionneeds expansion. You can help byadding to it.(December 2009) |
Uruguay returned to a moredemocratic system in 1942.[1]
On 13 July 1951, a formal pact between a fraction of the Colorados and the Herrerist Movement of the Blancos called for a plebiscite on constitutional reform. The plebiscite the following December 16 drew less than half of the 1.1 million voters to the polls, but the collegial system was approved by a small margin.[1]
The fifth constitution was promulgated on 25 January 1952 as the culmination of an effort to reestablish thecolegiado and the plural executive power, theNational Council of Government (Consejo Nacional de Gobierno), with six majority-party seats and three minority-party seats. This nine-member colegiado was ineffective because the president lacked control over the ministers and because the majority was seldom united. In the end, the ineffectiveness of these governments caused the public to turn against thecolegiado arrangement.[1]
In the elections of 27 November 1966, nearly 59 percent of Uruguayans voted to amend the 1952 constitution and to reestablish a presidential system of government, thus ending a fifteen-year experiment with thecolegiado. The new constitution, which became operative on 15 February 1967, and has remained in effect since then, created a strong one-person presidency, subject to legislative and judicial checks. In free and fair elections, Uruguayans approved the new charter and elected the Colorado Party to power again.[1]
During the presidential term ofJorge Pacheco Areco (1968–1972), a peculiar instrument was applied time after time, the prompt security measures (medidas prontas de seguridad). As a result, the country was in a sort of permanentstate of emergency, which further deteriorated intoauthoritarianism. The next president,Juan María Bordaberry, faced huge challenges from the military which ultimately led to the1973 coup d'état. The 1967 Constitution was suppressed during thecivic-military dictatorship of Uruguay from 1973 to 1985.
In 1976, the military government issued a series of constitutional decrees that intended to amend the 1967 constitution by creating the Council of the Nation (Consejo de la Nación) to serve as the supreme governmental body, with executive and legislative functions. It consisted of the thirty members of the Council of State (Consejo de Estado), the body created by the regime in June 1973 to act in lieu of the General Assembly, which was dissolved by the regime and the twenty-eight senior officers of the armed forces (sixteen from thearmy, six from thenavy, and six from theair force). The Council of the Nation appointed the president of the republic and the members of the Council of State, the Supreme Court of Justice, and the Tribunal of Administrative Claims, which was later dissolved in 1985. Eight institutional acts substituted for many of the functional provisions and guarantees of the 1967 constitution. For example, in addition to giving the Council of the Nation the power to appoint the president of the republic and to set general policy for the country, institutional acts deprived previous officeholders and candidates of their political rights and permitted the arbitrary dismissal of public employees.[1]
In 1985,Julio María Sanguinetti was sworn in as the new democratically elected president, after 12 years of dictatorship. The military question was tough to address; after much political bargaining, at the end of December was passed theExpiry Law, which constituted an amnesty of sorts for military people who had committed human-rights abuses. The constitutionality of this law was challenged, but ultimately the citizens backed the law in a plebiscite held in April 1989.
The 1967 Constitution is still in effect, though it was amended in 1989, 1994, 1996, and 2004. Though some consider the amendments of 1996 to have created a new constitution, Parliament continues to consider them changes to the Constitution of 1967.
The most important concepts that changed in 1996 were those related to elections. From 1999 onwards, the election cycle starts in June, with primary elections for all the parties, in order to choose single presidential candidates; in October, general elections are held, if no presidential candidate scores an absolute majority, a second round of voting is held in November; and finally, in May of the following year, municipal elections are held in all the Departments.
